TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MiddleMuffin9370 Archive

View 2 posts and 14 comments by MiddleMuffin9370 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

thanks for rephrasing, i know that misandry isnt as harmful as misogyny but doesn't mean its still bad to call out
/r/MensRights28/11/25 06:10 PM
9

I never said misandry had to be systemic, you don't need to be oppressed to be discriminated against. I also never even compared misogyny to misandry once in this post, I believe both are bad. You also are confusing oppressive discrimination with general discrimination here. Women can absolutely be discriminative towards men.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 05:50 PM
2

whatever you say man, also you shouldn't even be on this subreddit, you will get harassed by people on here, lots of misogynistic people are here, same thing happened to me
/r/MensRights28/11/25 11:37 AM
1

Human behavior is shaped by both biology and culture, but in very different ways. Biology influences broad tendencies, not rigid destinies, and these tendencies created certain patterns in early human societies. Physical differences—such as men generally having more upper-body strength—and hormonal profiles, like testosterone’s link to risk-taking and competition or estrogen and oxytocin’s connection to bonding and nurturing, shaped the kinds of tasks different groups tended to take on. Reproduc…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 11:26 AM
1

The fact that cultures vary in how patriarchal they are doesn’t undermine the concept of patriarchy—it actually reinforces it. Patriarchy isn’t supposed to describe a single, universal, identical system that every society follows like a script. It describes a recurring social pattern where men, on average, hold more political, economic, and social power than women. The existence of societies that are less patriarchal or structured differently doesn’t disprove patriarchy any more than the existen…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 11:14 AM
1

Why wouldn't it be? Biology had early tendencies of patriarchy, like different reproductive roles, average physical strengths and more like i said in my original post, Later people (not just men, even elders, women and cultural leaders) turned these into social patterns, I hope you actually did read my paragraph and processed what i said in my post <3
/r/MensRights28/11/25 10:59 AM
2

The fact that some societies are more or less patriarchal actually strengthens the argument, not weakens it. If patriarchy were a biological inevitability, every culture everywhere would look the same—but anthropology shows the opposite. There are matrilineal, matrifocal, and gender-egalitarian societies, as well as heavily patriarchal ones. That variation proves patriarchy isn’t an automatic human default but a cultural system that emerges under certain historical, economic, and social conditio…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 01:59 AM
1

Is this supposed to be against or with it? Because like i said, not just men, even women, elders and cultural leaders turned biological's early tendencies to social patterns which oppressed both men and women,
/r/MensRights28/11/25 12:24 AM
1

Biological differences and biological determinism aren’t the same thing. Biological determinism says genes directly control behavior; acknowledging that pregnancy, breastfeeding, average strength, and hormonal patterns existed in early humans isn’t claiming biology “designed oppression.” Biology creates constraints and tendencies, but culture is what organizes those tendencies into rules, traditions, and institutions. For example, humans are capable of aggression biologically, but no one argues …
/r/MensRights26/11/25 08:54 PM
3

This response is full of false assumptions, you're mixing up biology, cultural evolution, wealth inequality, feminism, personal rage, conspiracy and a lot of strawmen. You’re reacting to things I never actually said. Noting biological differences isn’t ‘biological determinism,’ and it doesn’t mean women were ‘designed to be oppressed.’ Biology creates tendencies; culture decides what to do with them. That’s why societies change over time—biology stayed the same, but norms, laws, and expectations…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 01:01 PM
-5

Yeah, why?
/r/MensRights25/11/25 09:35 PM
2

lmao
/r/MensRights25/11/25 09:28 PM
28

Not to mention, the sentence itself is a logical fallacy, Whenever people are talking about men's problems, they shift the conversation by saying: "and who set that system up" which makes it a logical fallacy because its a flaw in reasoning that makes an argument appear valid but is actually flawed. And since it basically means "men = bad " that is another logical fallacy, i also say this sometimes: “Systems aren’t ‘set up’ like a building. They form gradually through shared human behavior—men, …
/r/MensRights25/11/25 09:26 PM
3

by saying this "Misandry doesn’t require men to be systematically oppressed for it to be real—just like any form of discrimination, it can exist without an entire system built around it. Even when it isn’t institutional, misandry still has real effects on the world, influencing how male victims are treated, how men’s issues are discussed, and how society views masculinity."
/r/MensRights22/11/25 10:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter