TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MiddleReasonable647 Archive

View 2 posts and 1,007 comments by MiddleReasonable647 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
72

GeneralMiddleReasonable647/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:24 AM
4

FeminismMiddleReasonable647/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:17 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,007 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Yeah she’s pretty funny, and she defends men, so she gets a thumbs up from me. I also don’t agree with everything that she says, but I also disagree with myself sometimes, if you express enough opinions you will eventually say something stupid.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 04:00 PM
1

Notoriously bad? My entire education was private. I’m pretty sure that my CV is as solid as 98% of people who walk this earth.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 04:05 PM
2

James Cameron has always been girly man. Nothing new.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:01 PM
1

I dunno, for some weird reason I don’t want blood on my d!ck. I don’t want to stick my d!ck into a bloody cavity and slide it back and forth in a pool of blood. Men can be peculiar that way I guess.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:04 PM
0

Agreed. Infants are not dying of circumcision, but these anteater-nose-Dick-shaped men can’t get over the trauma that we normies must have endured lol. “My d!ck is oppressed! I’m so sad!”
/r/MensRights30/11/22 07:12 PM
2

Who is going to pay for six months leave?! Does anybody realize that at 6 months a baby is not independent?! That at 6 months nobody wants to babysit your child? That between 6 months and 4 years old is just about the hardest time period to raise a child? Where is this cheaper child care going to come from? Who provides it and how does it get made to be cheaper?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 03:56 PM
1

Where is that true?! In America? Because in America it’s done by doctors.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:44 AM
45

Almost all college girls are like her these days. It’s the worst secular ideological religion ever. Shrews like her can’t be tamed.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 11:32 PM
2

Or you can conclude that the normies you run into are not normal and are posting crazy lunatic feminist nonsense on TwoX.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:16 PM
23

My daughter has two little boys. She gave up her career for them because it’s a full-time job. Their nurturing is far greater and more fruitful than any working person could ever provide, they are so needy physically and emotionally. Human development is critical to society and to persons. A full-time mom is priceless. In Romania years ago under communism, they treated babies as potted plants in orphanages. The babies never developed emotional attachments and were not socially conscious. It’s cr…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 12:19 PM
1

I have no idea what the “woke virus” is or what causes it, but we need to eradicate it asap. All I can think of is to shout down these idiots when they are shouting slogans, refuse to go along with them, boycott companies that support them, show up at schools and voice your opinions loudly and proudly, call the university offices and complain when your conservative kid is shut down in class, vote against all leftists, make your opinions known at dinner parties, drop your woke friends and tell th…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 04:03 PM
95

Just visited there out of curiosity. What a cesspool. 13 million subscribers, the planet is doomed.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 08:05 PM
4

Will you marry me? Ok just kidding, but honestly where were girls like you 35 years ago? Sigh.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 06:44 PM
2

Fair enough. I still like the gal who posted that, I’ll pick her sight unseen if circumstances change for me lol. I could use a woman who respects men as men.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 04:29 PM
2

Language is fluid. Slang is really fluid. What you mean by “pick-me” is different from what this girl apparently means by “pick-me.” These things change faster than a teen-aged boy can get his pants down in the back of a sedan with his girlfriend on a Friday night.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 04:02 PM
-1

I don’t care. Comprende mi amigo? I know doctors and nurses personally who deal with these issues and they are not monsters. They tell me about adult males who have GU problems that require circumcision. It’s a pain. Adult males who are uncircumcised and later circumcised are quite happy. Fact. They often wish that they had been circumcised as neonates. Fact. You can stomp and scream and say all you want to, those studies were well done and are much better than anti circumcision studies. Keep po…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 03:38 PM
0

I never lied. I never said anything that I didn’t believe. Maybe you lied. Maybe you’re a born liar. But maybe not. Maybe I have the decency to accept that you are arguing in good faith. Nothing that I believe is falsifiable lol. You deny studies that you don’t like and accept studies that you do like. But the African studies were well done. Instead of getting into dueling banjos over studies, let’s try common sense. For centuries there are cultures that have practiced male circumcision. Males p…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 03:07 PM
0

The literature is full of medical studies on adult male circumcision that show no loss of sexual pleasure, no loss of functioning. There are studies that show that sensation is not lost. You just don’t like the studies. You can accuse me of lying, but they exist. The WHO did studies in Africa to see if adult circumcision could lower rates of transmission of HIV. The subjects of those studies were happy with the circumcision. Were they lying?! Are you saying that those patients were lying?! Did t…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 11:03 AM
0

That is a tendentious article and not science. The science is as I stated: no damaging effects, some positive benefits. I am indifferent to a procedure that causes no harm but has some potential medical benefits and (arguably) cosmetic benefits (women are changing on this) and cultural acceptance. You’re trying to alter the cultural acceptance based on your belief system of bodily autonomy and not on medical harm. That’s ok, culture changes, and if the bodily autonomy people carry this to the ex…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 03:22 AM
-1

Fair enough, I accept your remarks as very reasonable, Thanks for being polite! It’s just that circumcision has a long history as a religious ceremony thing, and has been done so frequently for so long and quite safely, and many women prefer it cosmetically, and there are some medical benefits, so when you put all that together and have to decide, I don’t personally care that much. I wanted to leave my sons intact, because I thought like you do, but my wife had the legal right to sign the papers…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:34 PM
2

Um, men and women both use the word “d!k” routinely. It’s so routine that it doesn’t even raise eyebrows. A man will call another man a d!k, a woman will call a man a d!k, people kind of shrug it off or not depending on the situation. But nobody uses the “c” word without knowing full well that he might get punched by somebody, probably the woman and maybe even her bf or husband. People lose their minds over the “c” word, we all know that it’s the verbal equivalent of a nuclear bomb. Degrading fe…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:26 PM
2

Anything truly equal to the small d!k insult?! It would have to involve genitalia, be routinely used in comedy and movies and TV, and directed at a subset of women to shame them specifically about their genitalia being ugly or deformed or inadequate. I’m thinking the answer is no.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 10:31 PM
1

Amen!
/r/MensRights23/11/22 09:57 PM
6

Um, is there an emoji directed against all women about looking like a reptile?! Are there reptilian jokes on tv and in the movies and by comedians all the time?! Is looking like a reptile a female-only thing?! Come on.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 09:41 PM
5

Small d!k insults have nothing to do with d!k pictures. Zero. It’s a standard joke and go-to insult against men. The double standard is huge. You see it all the time on tv shows and movies. You never see jokes about ugly vulvas or loose gaping vulvas or large beefy hanging labia minora. Why is that?! It ain’t due to unsolicited d!k pics.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 09:37 PM
3

You go first lol.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 09:33 PM
6

Girls can be vicious; but so can boys. I think boys get it from both sexes really, boys don’t stick up for each other because they’re too busy trying to be cool and look cool to the girls. So if a girl accuses a guy of having a small d!k, it’s likely that his male friends will jump in on that sh!t too. You won’t see anybody come to his defense ever, because then they get accused of having a small d!k too. Girls kind of look out for each other if guys start in on body shaming; guys, not so much, …
/r/MensRights23/11/22 09:32 PM
0

Fair enough lol.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 06:15 PM
-6

Wait a minute. A zygote is alive. It’s a single cell and it is very much alive. Note too that zygotes are never surgically aborted, their existence as a zygote is brief and the mother never knows about it. It becomes an embryo very quickly. Embryos are very much alive and quite human. They are ontologically human beings. So I disagree with your first statement, and I don’t agree that sapience and/or sentience is the only criterion for being a human being and deserving legal protection to live. A…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 06:07 PM
1

I hate to say this, but in a “he said-she said”, or “he-said he-said”, or “she-said he-said” or “she-said she-said” scenario, unless there is physical or DNA evidence, or eyewitness testimony of others, or video evidence, the burden of proof lies with the supposed victim. We should not convict people solely on the testimony of the supposed victim unless the supposed perpetrator admits to it. If a person goes to the hospital for an exam, and there is evidence, then that’s different. But in a pure…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 05:47 PM
12

Let’s invent an emoji that insults female genitalia. How about a hand with the thumb tucked in, four fingers across, spread the two first fingers apart from the second two fingers creating a V sign for “wide vulva with fat labia minora.” (The fingers representing the labia majora and minora).
/r/MensRights23/11/22 05:26 PM
2

Is birth control that hard?! No, it’s not. Even a low IQ person can do it.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 04:06 PM
5

The ontological essence of the fetus is: human being. So you can’t say “if you don’t like it don’t do it.” I can’t ignore that a human being is being murdered any more than I could watch a person be raped. Sorry, that’s just how I see it. You haven’t told me any thing that would change my mind. How is it not a human being? Why is the mother not responsible for HER baby that she created? Hmmm?!
/r/MensRights23/11/22 04:02 PM
5

I knew it. What propaganda are you talking about and what does race have to do with this?! A 6 month old fetus is absolutely a baby in appearance, it can survive outside the uterus in a NICU. It has a head and face and two arms and two legs and a brain and will move away from the abortionist as the killer grabs it by the limbs. A full term baby born at 39-40 weeks is totally dependent on the mom or other provider for its life. It has zero ability to live on its own. Heck, I doubt that you or I c…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 03:13 PM
-13

Here we go… I quite agree that the newborn doesn’t get a choice in circumcision. The newborn also doesn’t have the choice to be born in America, he could have been aborted and torn limb from limb and his skull crushed, and if I had to bet, I’d say that you believe that the mom has that choice. Very strange ideas you have. Mom can murder the little guy gruesomely up until term birth, but don’t you dare remove his foreskin surgically with anesthetic and aseptic conditions! Heaven forbid that he ha…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 02:58 PM
129

It’s fine. What good is an echo chamber? I refuse to post on a site that doesn’t allow dissent. That’s why feminist sites are so toxic, they ban anybody with a different opinion. I like this site because it allows different opinions. I happen to be neutral about neonatal circumcision, for example, do it if you want, don’t do it if you don’t want. I get flamed big time, major hatred and vitriol spewed my way, but they don’t ban me. Reddit should have an open opinion policy across the board. Other…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 01:55 PM
6

Trash interview, trash person.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:45 AM
10

Are you ok? You sound not ok.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 02:38 AM
13

It’s a sub in reaction to mistreatment of men by society in general and feminists in particular. If that’s negative, so be it. If you want Kumbaya, start a MensKumbaya sub.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 02:30 AM
0

Some subs are meant to vent. This is a place to vent. MensRights by title refers to areas in society where men are being denied our rights or privileges by virtue of just being men. If we want a place to build each other up, we could have a sub called MensKumbaya.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 01:30 AM
5

No, read my second sentence. The only “bashing” is defensive on this forum as far as I have seen. I have seen reactions here criticizing feminists in general, for hating on men generally. That’s all I meant. Some of my favorite people are women😇.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 01:16 AM
27

If women are being “bashed”, it’s based on their feminist hatred of men. I have never seen blanket bashing of women for being women.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 10:32 PM
19

I don’t need no stinking day for having been made a man, and women don’t need a stinking day for having been made women. We are born into this world having achieved nothing by virtue of biology.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 09:29 PM
31

Wait….they let one female take a special needs boy to the boys’ bathroom but they won’t let one male do it?! I’m very confused.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 11:51 PM
1

YT censors me all the time. I hate it.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 11:25 PM
0

That article is the most tendentious rubbish that I have ever read. But just a couple points: In the body of the article it states that women choose to get out of medicine primarily because of a desire to attend to their family. I applaud that choice. They do not leave because “oppression”. In my experience, the medical field bends over backward for women because it has to or there won’t be any providers! My second issue is the bogus surgical outcomes “study”. The thing was retrospective, and no…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 03:34 PM
1

Women one generation ago had no systemic disincentives to go into Medicine and any specialty that they wanted. If some random father out there talked his daughter out if it, major MEH! I know a father who talked his boys out of going to college. Yawn. Life is like that, random people do random things that might be stupid, sexist, etc. The real facts are that at least 40% of female MDs quit after 7 years of practice. Nobody pays women any less for any medical procedures or codes based on their ge…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 02:46 PM
28

I agree with you totally. Why wasn’t there criminal finding because of false lab reports that affected the health of people?! The financial fraud alone is worth more than 11 years! A man would have gotten a much worse sentence.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 12:00 PM
16

Great post thanks. Nobody should be raped in prison. If you incarcerate people, you owe them food, water, healthcare, and safety.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 06:40 AM
-1

Agree. Feminists control indirectly or directly the media and universities and high schools and grade schools and Hollywood. A single dude spewing whatever is free to speak his mind.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:40 PM
2

I missed this comment. It happens all the time. All the time. I told you that females routinely request no male medical students in OB-gyn settings. They routinely request female nurse, not male, to place a urinary catheter. Mammography centers are 100% female technicians and nurses. Testicular ultrasound is 95% female technicians. Urology nurses are 95% female. When men ask for only males, they cannot and will not be accommodated. Do you even work in healthcare? Gynecology is about 70% female d…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:09 AM
1

You have the patience of Job. Some people just can’t admit the truth.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:01 AM
1

Ha!
/r/MensRights17/11/22 08:33 PM
1

He went to jail. It’s illegal and immoral and unethical. 99.9% of men and women would oppose it. You’re the .1% of sexually liberated exhibitionists.😂 How’s your onlyfans account doing?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 06:32 PM
1

Given that you’re so open about modesty issues, are you ok with a male gynecologist snapping photos of his patients with a hidden camera? Why not! It’s not anything he hasn’t quite literally seen! Using your logic, there’s nothing wrong with it.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 04:56 PM
1

So you’re ok with a bunch of silly nurses going down to a morgue to check out a dead dude?! I’m sure as a good little feminist you’d be ok with men doing the same to a hot girl dead in a morgue. (The wailing from feminists would wake a dead man). You’re really lacking in self-insight.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:43 PM
1

Put fingers into ears, scream la la la la la. You wouldn’t want to have to engage your brain and hear the other side would you?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:12 PM
1

Nonsense. Female nurses have been caught going to the morgue (!) to check out a well-endowed dead man! They have snapped photos of their patients and shared them with other nurses. These are publicly reported events. I personally saw such behavior from female care providers toward men. To be fair, a male gynecologist was caught with a hidden camera taking photos of his female patients. But I definitely saw a double standard against men in the hospital environment while women were treated with ut…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:49 AM
1

Just get the blood psa test. Prostate check is nearly obsoleted by that blood test, many pcp docs are skipping the rectal exam.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:20 AM
8

She blinded me with science!
/r/MensRights17/11/22 02:03 AM
1

Interesting take, thanks.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 01:00 AM
6

It’s routine for women to be accorded privacy in medical settings. They routinely ask for no males in the room in OB-gyn and other settings. As a medical student over 35 years ago I was kicked out of rooms all the time. I never saw it in reverse. This is the first post that I have seen where a man stood up for his privacy by requesting no female students.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 09:44 PM
14

Your reaction says it all. Instead of assailing a woman for posting about the man’s genitalia, you make light of it by calling it a “mean comment”. If I insulted a woman’s vulva, calling it “beef curtains”, would you similarly dismiss all reactions to that insult as no big deal?! Would you not call me a sexist pig? A misogynist? Yes you would.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 03:35 PM
40

Plenty of posts were that he didn’t deserve a preference, whereas women do deserve a preference, because women don’t care about seeing his “wrinkly junk”, or his “little penis”, etc. Feminists are nasty people.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 03:01 PM
16

Wrong. There were plenty of misandrist posts, including some nasty feminists who accused him of having a small penis. Of course that kind of comment is ok and not deleted by moderators….whereas a similar dig on a woman would be deleted.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 02:57 PM
16

Men are not offered any such option. The field is dominated by women. If you asked, they would roll their eyes and make fun of you. Most likely they could not find a male or group of males to do the job so you’re stuck.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 02:02 PM
48

There are indeed double standards that favor women in healthcare, and it will never change. That’s because so much of the field is dominated by women. If you need a testicular ultrasound, the tech will likely be a woman. If you see a urologist, the chaperone will likely be a female, and the nurses will be female. They won’t ask you if you care. I saw females peek under the sheet of asleep male patients to “check them out”; I saw jokes made about male patients that would never be tolerated agains…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 02:00 PM
244

Is there any other group that could be treated this way?! The question answers itself. Vilify a group publicly hard enough and long enough, and soon enough Bad Things will happen. I already see the Stockholm syndrome overtaking the minds of young White males, who virtue signal their way through college life in a duck and cover posture to appease the woke mob. It’s pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 03:28 PM
35

Huh? Theranos caused medical harm to thousands of patients. It’s a safe bet that some people died as a result of her fake lab testing. What are you even talking about?! Holy cow I’d give her a life sentence. Her chief biochemist partner committed suicide and he told her that the “drop of blood” tests didn’t work! The jury might be too stupid to see that fraud of that kind is criminally negligent, but I am not! She knew the lab testing was bogus!
/r/MensRights14/11/22 12:04 AM
1

Agree!
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:37 AM
1

Criminal murderers tend not to “act right”.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:27 AM
0

Agree.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:26 AM
1

Lol. I’m to the Right of most people here, of that I’m sure. I oppose public schools, I support a flat tax on any income over subsistence living (to be determined by adjusting the poverty level based on inflation every 5 years), I am against feminism, I never voted for a DemoKKKRat in my life, I oppose abortion, I support border controls, I despise Biden and Pelosi, I voted for Trump twice, I support Desantis, I oppose public sector unions, I loathe BLM and Antifa. I have been “persecuted” (see …
/r/MensRights12/11/22 01:44 AM
3

Agree! Thanks for the discussion. I see your points for sure, I’m just trying to see it from a cop’s POV who comes upon a crazy scene and a guy telling an “unbelievable” story.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:41 PM
1

If his optic nerves were shot, time didn’t matter to his vision. He might have had elevated ICP for two days from hemorrhage, it’s doubtful that 6 more hours mattered to his condition.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 02:19 AM
-7

He had been shot two days prior but the 6 hour interrogation cost him his life. Hmmm…..that doesn’t make sense. If he had been seen at a hospital exactly 2 days after he was shot he could have been saved, but two days plus 6 hours cost him his life. Is that what you’re claiming?!
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:43 AM
2

No. Nobody knows his or her limits until they reach them accidentally. “I thought that driving in the snowstorm would be no big deal until I ran into a ditch”. “I went skiing on a Black slope and slid out and got a concussion”. “I had a patient who died on me in the ER from an asthma attack, i never saw anybody get so hypoxic so fast”. “I missed a cancerous nodule on a breast exam”. “I thought that your broken leg was not ischemic, so I told you to see the orthopedist in the morning”. “I took a …
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:25 PM
-8

Interesting. So maybe the picture of severe head trauma became more apparent with time. There’s a reason that Medicine is a difficult art, and cops can’t be expected to diagnose stuff. I know a guy who died of viral meningitis whose initial symptoms were acting strangely, kind of paranoid, refused to leave his room, talked about demons attacking him, and his friends chalked it up to some crazy religious experience that he was having, since he was known to get a bit weird about demonic attacks in…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 10:05 PM
2

A .22LR has a tiny entrance wound. Hair could cover it easily. I know a guy who was shot in the face and the wound was never sutured, I can barely see the scar after he showed it to me.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:38 PM
-29

I don’t know how many bullets he had in his head. However, a .22LR leaves a tiny entrance wound, invisible if covered by hair. The Raccoon Eyes would be a marker of head trauma to an ER doctor or neurosurgeon or Ophthalmologist, but not to a cop. Any scuffle or trauma could cause it and if he had fought with his victim, that could be the explanation. The cop eventually figured it out, I’m ok with what happened. Most female victims are killed by their husband or boyfriend and not street thug thie…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:37 PM
-31

This case is difficult. Cops aren’t trained to diagnose traumatic brain injuries, and they deal with all kinds of lunatics out there. People take drugs, people have paranoid schizophrenia, I don’t know if they should have figured this out right away, it’s hard to say. Armchair quarterbacking is so easy…… If they took every nutbar criminal that they run into to the hospital, then every arrest would need medical evaluation. I know of an MD diabetic who had a hypoglycemic episode while driving and …
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:15 PM
1

Prove it. The nurses would pitch a fit. Neonatal nurses are like attack dogs in protecting babies. The Neonatal docs pushed for anesthesia for years, going back over 20 years ago, for circumcision, and it was a huge campaign and it was very successful. Any hospital that did what you are claiming would lose its accreditation in a hurry.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 08:29 PM
1

I call BS. That’s absolute nonsense lies. You should be ashamed of yourself. It’s embarrassing that you would post that kind of baloney.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 08:17 PM
-2

They use lidocaine or general anesthesia. The sucrose thing is old news.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:37 PM
-2

😂. So true!
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:43 AM
8

They use 1). General anesthesia with penile block. Or 2). General anesthesia without penile block or 3). local anesthesia with lidocaine. Infants can get general anesthesia if needed so your whole premise is wrong. Use google scholar and look up anesthesia for neonatal circumcision. And stop posting if you don’t know stuff.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:33 AM
-2

All medical doctor (MD) circumcisions in the USA use anesthesia. Period.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:23 AM
-1

No. And all doctors in America use anesthesia. All. That means every one.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 01:43 AM
2

What prompted the slap?!
/r/MensRights08/11/22 08:45 PM
14

As Bill Burr says, “No Reason?! I can give you a thousand reasons I’d want to hit a woman”. (Paraphrasing his comedy routine. Blame him, I’m just the messenger).
/r/MensRights07/11/22 05:16 PM
1

Agreed! Excellent.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 09:35 AM
4

Then let’s make that argument. 100% female army navy and marines and Air Force. 100% female carpenters and brick layers and roofers. 100% male doctors and lawyers and professors. Or we could go with a meritocracy. The last one sounds better to most sapient creatures. Merit in the US SC would be a judge who judges the constitution and doesn’t make laws from the bench. Few women are interested in that idea. ACB seems to be wedded to that idea.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:22 PM
1

RBG, the wicked witch of the west.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:18 PM
3

Never saw myself as a feminist, never bought into socially politically correct narratives, always saw myself as someone who questions things they try to brainwash into believing.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 08:17 PM
1

Nobody said that surgery was risk-free. What was said by me is that immunological rejection is not a risk, because it is not biological material, it is silicone or silicone filled with saline. Immunological rejection does not happen. Infection can happen. Big difference. From Cleveland clinic: “There have been concerns about cancer and connective tissue disease resulting from the use of silicone implants. This has been the case with some silicone breast implants. Generally, the prostheses used i…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:09 PM
1

No there isn’t.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:46 AM
2

There’s no risk or rejection since it’s not biologic but prosthetic.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 11:33 PM
1

Teacher/student, big difference from Romeo and Juliet scenario. Not cool.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 10:04 PM
3

We don’t hate all women, we just hate AOC and other fringe lunatics.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:52 PM
-3

Equating female genital mutilation with male Circumcision is nonsense.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:05 PM
-13

I’m perfectly happy, I’m sorry that bothers you. I want so badly to feel oppressed so I can punch my victimhood card, but I just can’t bring myself to do it.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:37 PM
-18

I’m Happily circumcised, find a real subject to complain about, thanks.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:11 PM
1

Oh, let me read your post again, sorry if I misinterpreted….
/r/MensRights03/09/22 03:39 PM
2

Acorn had nothing to do with George Floyd lol. It was founded many years before that event so I don’t know why you’re bringing it up.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:14 PM
7

Acorn deserved to be put out of existence. What a bunch of crazy leftist lunatics.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:28 PM
8

It’s leftist bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:57 PM
19

An unlikable character to any sapient creature. Hard pass on that movie.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:41 PM
1

Lien.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:09 AM
21

The Gillette ad was directed to all men. It was scolding all men. This ad suggests that a particular woman just might have cheated on her bf/husband. Big difference.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:23 PM
4

Men get in trouble trying to help. Once burned, twice shy. I’ve had women bitch at me for holding a door open for them!
/r/MensRights10/08/22 10:56 PM
50

It’s like being a conservative Black and called an “Uncle Tom”. Ignore it.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 04:18 PM
1

I understand mgtow, it’s a natural backlash against feminists and the anti-male matriarchy that poisons our political discourse. My life would not be more fulfilling, however, without my wife and kids, despite the pain that family life entails. And there’s a lot of pain, it’s impossible to avoid. Avoiding pain is easy, but seeking fulfillment is not always about avoiding pain. Everybody has to choose, choose wisely (I’m not saying that for many men, mgtow is not the right choice. But let’s don’t…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:51 PM
6

Women agitated to take white collar jobs and they got their wishes. They did not and do not look for parity in numbers for dirty and hard jobs. When was the last time anybody compared numbers for plumbing versus all the talk about parity for law and medicine for example?!
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:14 PM
0

Name a place that you want to live to. Put your money where your mouth is.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:04 AM
0

Well the pagan world was darned sight more dangerous than Christian lands. They had plenty of gods, and plenty of atheists, and it was very dangerous all over the world. I prefer Christian moral sensibilities. I can’t think of a single atheist country that I want to move to, nor a pagan-religion country.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:57 PM
0

Atheists?! Do tell….
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:36 PM
0

That didn’t happen, fail. The Salem witches thing happened in America in the long past among a particular sect of very odd Christians. It was widely condemned, unlike the activities of radical secular leftists who burned churches in recent memory.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:31 PM
1

Canada had a lot of churches burned.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:13 PM
0

World-wide, it IS true. Look it up.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:12 PM
0

He might not be American genius.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:08 PM
0

Well, there’s proof of the OP point. Nice.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:07 PM
-3

It’s not a persecution fetish. Look up persecutions of Christians world-wide. It’s real. And attacks on the patriarchy, White males is very real in public discourse. As for Christians specifically, many Christian churches were attacked and destroyed over the last few years. Look it up.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 08:42 PM
4

What?! This is Feminist gobbledygook. Get outa here with that crap.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:17 PM
1

But unless the amendment spells out all scenarios that I discussed, judges will interpret the amendment however they want to. Just pay attention to constitutional law, it’s a mess.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:24 AM
1

And what unintended consequences can you envision from the passage of the ERA?! I can see gender-neutral bathrooms being forced on everyone, and sports being integrated and dominated by men since we can’t “discriminate”, and women being signed up for the draft (which men here support generally), and quotas for genders in fields like nursing and jackhammering concrete and electrical linemen and hairdressers, and lawsuits against companies for unequal numbers of males and females doing jobs…..laws…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:56 AM
3

The best I can cite off the top of my head are 1). The Avengers original TV shows with Emma Peale. She was strong and sexy at the same time, stood up for herself, got into scrapes, but did not emasculate anybody. 2). Sigourney Weaver in the movie Alien. Dayam!
/r/MensRights04/08/22 03:27 PM
36

In good female hero roles, the women don’t make so many self-conscious “girl power” comments, they simply use power that they have and let the chips fall where they may. They don’t try to outdo men qua men, they just nonchalantly exert power. It’s much sexier than the “I’m better than you” nonsense Hollywood foists on us.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 01:36 AM
10

What rights are denied people in America?! It seems to me that we could use a heavy dose of responsibility more than additional fake rights. You don’t have the right to force others to give you stuff. Americans have got the wrong notions of positive rights.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:11 AM
3

And he literally governed as a liberal.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:38 PM
0

That because Johnson governed as a liberal.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:21 AM
1

These people want so badly to come up with a smoking gun with which to indict all neonatal circumcision, but statistics just won’t cooperate with them. Darn the luck. I am not convinced that there is a single answer at all: do it, or don’t do it, I don’t care, is what I think.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 12:30 AM
22

UK is insufferably leftist and goofy.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 12:07 AM
-1

Um, reading comprehension is not your strong suit. I conceded that issue already in that I agreed we don’t know the indications for the procedure. The article I cited showed that increasing age increases complication rates. Fail. Neonatal routine circumcision is not the issue here at all.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 12:04 AM
0

More downvotes for excessive rational ideation.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 08:13 PM
4

False. State law is what matters now. The solution is birth control and abstinence. Easy peasy.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:24 PM
2

Nice. Up to what time in pregnancy would you kill a baby?!
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:23 PM
4

But it’s not “their own bodies”. Genetically, chemically, immunologically, biologically, and ontologically, the product of conception is at all stages a quite separate and distinct creature from the mother. There are biological barriers between the two beings. Don’t tell falsehoods and maybe you will think logically to a conclusion.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:57 PM
5

What is an embryo/fetus?! It’s a human life. Period.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:50 PM
-5

Nothing is done for “no reason”. The survey showed that Muslims generally believe that there are medical benefits to the procedure. In this particular case, the age of the child suggests a medical indication, but you are correct that it was an inference and not conclusively true. However, the debate about neonatal circumcision is not advanced by this article in any way. The child was not a neonate and we do not know the indications for the procedure.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:48 PM
-5

Note that anti circ people downvote simple facts. I made no statement of opinion regarding routine circumcision, I only made statements of science facts, surveys, and practices, with citation.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:17 PM
-7

Most Muslims in Pakistan believe that the procedure should be done before 60 days, although there is no guidance on that from the Quran, and it varies widely in the Muslim world. Complication rates are generally thought to increase with increased age at the time of circumcision. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282422/ I don’t know the practices of Muslims in Indonesia or Malaysia etc.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:48 PM
-12

The boy was 10 when the circumcision was done, ergo, this has nothing to do with the debate over routine neonatal circumcision. He must have had a MEDICAL REASON for the circumcision. The family claims that poor medical practice was performed, so the story should be: boy with a medical condition got worse after a poorly performed surgical procedure that was necessitated by a medical problem.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 07:56 AM
29

Bipolar does not mean that she’s not morally culpable.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 01:09 AM
2

https://youtu.be/80JqoyaL-p4
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:10 PM
1

They are free from PP. if not free, they are cheap as heck.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:19 AM
1

BCP are free. Yet they can’t remember to take them. Odd.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:47 AM
1

I’ve been flamed quite enough on this subject on this site.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 06:20 PM
1

I don’t try to control the narrative, I’m just a guy who posts stuff occasionally. You talk to the mods yourself and tell them you want this site to be totally anti-circ lol. I prefer freedom of speech. I’m just here to prevent the activists from having a monopoly.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:30 PM
1

I don’t try to control the narrative, I’m just a guy who posts stuff occasionally. You talk to the mods yourself and tell them you want this site to be totally anti-circ lol. I prefer freedom of speech. I’m just here to prevent the activists from having a monopoly.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:30 PM
-1

This site should not become a circumcision activist site.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 11:30 AM
2

Saddest story of a life I’ve read in years. Who could be that cruel?
/r/MensRights23/07/22 04:17 AM
-5

Not really. Mankind had gotten along for 2000 years either doing neonatal circumcision, or not, and it wasn’t until recently that it became an activist redoubt. Live and let live is not the purview of activists.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 04:06 AM
-2

Nobody changes anybody else’s mind on the subject, except in GroupThink fashion. (Verbal intimidation is very effective to some people).
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:39 AM
-6

This subject always leads to people flaming each other verbally, not worth it.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 01:52 AM
1

The ontological essence of the fetus is unrelated to your insurance and monetary questions.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:46 AM
1

Ok, bill the father for half of everything . Next question?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:45 AM
2

Never heard those in comedy or movies.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:18 PM
2

Really bad arguments about the ontological essence of the zygote/embryo/fetus do not change the morality of abortion. Major fail. I never bought life insurance for my children, so were they non humans?! They didn’t contribute to my financial health so why would I insure their lives for a monetary settlement in case of death? Child support in pregnancy makes no sense since there is little additional financial burden incurred to the mother by the fetus in utero, but ok, make a small financial supp…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 05:41 AM
1

Ok. You re-grew your foreskin lol. Congratulations. I don’t care about anything but science facts. Studies show no difference between cut and uncut. Period.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:24 PM
1

I said quite plainly that I was interested only in the question of sexual satisfaction after circumcision, and that report showed that the bulk of EVIDENCE in numerous STUDIES is that adult males suffer no ill effects after circumcision.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:49 PM
1

A review of many studies: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C13&q=African+men+circumcised+as+adults+and+sexual+sensitivity+++&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1657862501983&u=%23p%3Dv5kflyn8QZsJ
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:22 AM
0

The point is that men do not become unhappy with their sex life after adult circumcision. That is proven in the study.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:29 PM
0

Anecdotes. Use google scholar on African men circumcised as adults for decreased hiv transmission. 99% noted no difference or improvement in their sexual satisfaction.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:04 PM
1

It showed lower rates of HIV transmission.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:03 PM
1

Adult males are circumcised and notice no difference. Your preconceptions mean nothing.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:06 PM
0

Assertions without evidence. The studies were good.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:06 PM
0

It was a limited intervention for proof of concept.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:05 PM
1

Google search said not: “The hypocoristic ending -y has been widely used in colloquial English for 500 years, and similarly has no connection with pusillanimous or any other Latinate word. There's no positive evidence for the pusillanimous → pussy derivation as a genuine historical source — it seems to be a sporadic folk etymology.”
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:37 AM
1

I never mentioned the word “pusillanimous”. I am unaware of the etymology of the P word.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:50 PM
4

Quote a single comedian or movie where labia size is made into an insult or joke. Then look at how many small d!ck jokes are made. Huge difference.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:15 PM
1

I never said that it’s a good idea for one sex to make fun of the other now did I?! Hmmm?!
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:05 PM
1

She lied, it’s right there in the article.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:01 AM
2

Wait….the article says that 464,000 people were homicide victims in the entire world in 2017. There can’t be 5 million male homicides in Mexico in 2020. There are 6000 male homicides per 100 million people! You can’t get to 5 million murders of men in one year in Mexico with those stats.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:30 AM
1

As far as an equivalent body shaming, acceptable in movies and comedy and daily life, yes it’s a serious statement.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:04 AM
2

YOU said that I would find it acceptable if there were a female equivalent, but I never said any such thing. I think that body shaming is always wrong.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:03 AM
7

Agreed! Nobody shames women, it isn’t done.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:28 PM
-6

The bottom line is that making fun of small d!cks is sexist and stupid but routinely done in movies and comedy. Women use that insult a lot. There is no equivalent female version. None.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:25 PM
-35

Ok, try to think really hard about the equal language comparison. To call someone the D word is an insult about them acting like a jerk. Male genitalia as an insult. To call someone the P word is to say that they’re not brave or strong. Female genitalia used as an insult. SDE is small D!ck insult meant to shame a man with a small d!ck. An equal would be a phrase like “small pssy energy.” Oh, wait, but nobody makes fun of particular types of vulvas based on size now do they?! See?! It’s a sexist …
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:20 PM
-75

The equal comparison would be to calling someone a d!ck. So your argument fails.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:06 PM
4

Women get away with things that men don’t, it’s as simple as that. I’d tell a story of a minor sexual assault but nobody would believe me, so why bother?! It happened for sure, and because I’m a man and not a woman, I just brushed it off as a thing that women get away with that men don’t. Who respects a man ratting out a female employee who comes on to a man at a workplace, even if she physically touched the man?! Ans: Nobody.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 07:29 PM
3

Men do not get to make fun of females in the workplace, so the same should apply to females.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 02:22 AM
-10

Um, the vagina lubricates with mucus with sexual stimulation. Are you sure that you’re talking about the same thing I’m talking about?
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:14 AM
-55

Garbage. Females lubricate, males do not. A circumcised male has no problem with intercourse whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 01:17 AM
-1

No. I am against the histrionic claims of injury due to circumcision. There is zero medical evidence for routine harm from the procedure. Also, if you can’t confer “life autonomy” onto a baby (! You would take its life?!) why would you think that it has “foreskin autonomy”?!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:57 PM
0

“Non sequitur.” I reviewed the posts, I don’t see where you defended abortion, so the reply should not have been sent to you, mea culpa. I disagree that the comparison about bodily autonomy vis-a-vis circumcision is a non sequitur vis-a-vis abortion. They are quite related questions. So declare yourself, are you a hypocritical abortion supporter or not?! Why is it ok to kill a baby but not to circumcise a baby?! And don’t give me semantic nonsense about the use of the term “fetus” vs “baby”, you…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:15 PM
1

The medical benefits are discussed in the article. There is certainly debate about doing routine neonatal circumcision even if population studies show overall benefits, because for any individual, there may be little or no benefit. So, I choose freedom to choose for individual families.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:43 PM
0

“Bodily autonomy” for neonates regarding circumcision but not for babies in utero, whose very lives you would snuff out in brutal fashion. If that’s not hypocrisy, what is?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:41 PM
2

The cognitive dissonance they should be experiencing eludes them because they are abortion supporters who, almost by definition, don’t care about truth. Anybody who could support killing human life in utero but who goes around screaming “bodily autonomy” for neonates vis-a-vis circumcision is not a rational creature.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:09 PM
2

That’s false. It’s a review of many many studies.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:01 PM
0

Lol. You can’t read medical journals can you?! According to the journal review article, the medical benefits argue for routine neonatal circumcision. I however am looking at it from an individual choice point of view and not an epidemiologist’s population health point of view. I like individual autonomy over population based questions of general health. So for example, I prefer to let people decide whether to be vaccinated against covid rather than forcing people to be vaccinated, because I like…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:53 AM
0

Since you can’t read medical articles for yourself: There are putative medical benefits and no loss of sexual functioning after circumcision. The medical risk reductions are small but significant. The surgery does not cause loss of sexual functioning. My conclusion is that it is a procedure that could be helpful across populations but it is not sufficiently helpful as to be required. Read the article for once, you might actually learn something and be less snotty, a trait that you have since you…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:35 AM
0

You never read the article. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:07 AM
0

That’s amazingly disgusting in its cold and evil calculus.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:06 AM
0

The medical benefits of routine neonatal circumcision are in that article. You don’t get to twist words. When I refer to circumcision, I am generally referring to male circumcision, since female circumcision is really genital mutilation. I was quite specific in stating that I oppose female genital neonatal circumcision and am indifferent to male circumcision, and I never stated otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:45 AM
0

Amazing. Using your logic, let’s kill all people who are circumcised lol. It’s scary to think that people like you occupy the planet.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:40 AM
0

I gave you a review article. I never lied. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12361 Try reading and learning and rationalizing instead of accusing and emoting.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:26 AM
0

I am neither for or against neonatal circumcision for all the reasons that I cited and the medical studies that I provided. There is nothing more to say. You have an emotional attachment to your opposition. I don’t argue with emotions, so I think we are done here.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:12 AM
0

Did you read the article on the putative medical benefits and lack of risks?! No. Your post is not worthy of reply since it assumes no benefits to the procedure other than cosmetic.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:04 AM
-1

This review is helpful. There are lots of citations. If similar levels of evidence exist for female genital surgery, I am unaware of it. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12361
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:51 AM
-1

Sexual functioning includes sexual pleasure. If you know of studies that show that removing the clitoral hood does not damage sexual functioning, please provide them. If you know of putative medical benefits of female clitoral hood surgery, please provide them. I have cited studies to other posters in this discussion and believe that the medical arguments for male circumcision are sufficient to allow for the procedure. I do not think said benefits would mandate the procedure however. It’s a comp…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:49 AM
0

I think I made my point very clearly, I am opposed to female neonatal genital surgery. While embryology demonstrates homologous tissue anlage for the clitoris and penis, the fully formed organs are quite different in functioning and general size. Removing foreskin is not damaging to functioning. Many studies demonstrate that.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:34 AM
0

There is no correlation between female genital surgery and male circumcision. I know of no possible tissue removal in females that would not be damaging to sexual functioning. Male circumcision does not damage or hinder or adversely affect sexual functioning.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:28 AM
-1

In the 1990s anesthetic was used by some doctors and not others. There was a “crusade” by neonatologists to demand routine use of local anesthetic, with the result that it would currently be malpractice to do the procedure without anesthetic.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:21 AM
-2

Agree.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:03 AM
-6

Anesthetic is used. You just lost all credibility.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:02 AM
0

Agree!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:01 AM
-1

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12361
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:00 AM
1

Maybe you should change your mind: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12361
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:00 AM
1

I am fine with the choice of parents to circumcise or not circumcise. I have zero preference. I simply am opposed to histrionic nonsense about “mutilation” or false claims about loss of sexual functioning. There are medical benefits that might outweigh the risks, the latter of which have been greatly exaggerated by the emotionally unhinged intactivist activists.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:57 AM
2

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12361 I had to violate my choice to avoid citing studies.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:50 AM
-1

You’re getting inside your own head so to speak: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12361 There is no loss of sexual functioning. Read the entire article and I suggest that you seek counseling if you truly believe that you were harmed when you were not.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:37 AM
0

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12361
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:26 AM
-1

I did not want to do dueling studies. Here’s a review of three: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=adult+circumcision+in+Africa+for+HIV+transmission+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1657008143038&u=%23p%3D0oqhkDePwdIJ I am not interested in the debate about the HIV transmission rates, but rather the evidence that circumcision does not affect sexual functioning in adults who are circumcised.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:03 AM
2

Probably not…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 07:58 AM
-2

The surgeries were done on African adult males who were sexually active. They did not know if HIV transmission rates would be lowered through circumcision, neither did the researchers. No claim about that was made to the patients before surgery. Patients were randomized and there were control groups.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 07:57 AM
0

Bodily autonomy should extend to human beings in utero. Who would it be ok to completely destroy a fetus (Latin for baby) but not ok to circumcise the fetus?! Hmmm?! You can destroy his penis and his entire body but you can’t circumcise him?! Odd. Would you oppose transgender surgery on a 7 month old baby in utero ?! Why?!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 07:54 AM
-1

Clinically shown to be irrelevant to sexual functioning.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 07:52 AM
-7

They studied normal sexually active adult males and circumcised them and asked their sexual satisfaction before and after. No difference. This was done to see if HIV transmission rates could be reduced by circumcision. Good studies have been done.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:23 AM
1

I doubt that. You’re likely quite functional with zero ill effects from your circumcision, other than a psychological fear that you are less sensitive than you “should” or “could” be.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:12 AM
-2

I said that I read many many studies. I cited them many times on this forum but it becomes a battle of studies. Comprende mi amigo?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:02 AM
2

You have adduced zero logical explanations for your belief that a baby can be killed in utero, but that he can’t be circumcised. It makes no sense. Either there is bodily autonomy or there is not. Make up your mind.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:39 AM
2

Plants have rights too. You’re a speciesist, monster.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:13 AM
2

Yeah, like vegetarians eating plants, which are living creatures, you monster.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:10 AM
2

What constitutes a person to you? What confers personhood?! Self-awareness doesn’t exist for neonates, so that’s not what constitutes personhood. Besides, I want to protect human life, not human personhood, which is totally undefinable. The first thing all murderous monsters do is deny the personhood of their victims. Congratulations, monster.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:04 AM
1

Lol. I’m all for consistency. You want bodily autonomy?! Ok, let’s have it! No abortions, and no neonatal circumcision! Deal!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:39 AM
-1

I’ll give you neonatal circumcision in a trade for no abortions. Deal?!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:36 AM
2

Why do you say “neonatal” vs “adult” circumcision? It’s because we distinguish various phases of HUMAN life. Child, adult, toddler; teenager, senior citizen….. Comprende mi amigo?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:35 AM
3

Fair enough, thank you!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:02 AM
4

No, not that! I can’t take it!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:38 AM
1

The ontological essence of a fetus/human being is quite distinct from animals. What gives YOU the right to eat plants?! You’re prejudiced against living plants! How dare you!
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:28 AM
2

The mental thought process should have triggered an epiphany for you. But some people are too dense to have epiphanies I suppose. If you anti-circ activists make neonatal circumcision illegal, then we can do start doing in utero circumcisions on them and see how you react…..if you oppose in utero circumcision at that point, then your cognitive dissonance on the subject should make your pro abortion hypocrisy clear as daylight. No, I’m not a vegan.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:14 AM
0

So you have no consistency: bodily autonomy does not extend to the baby in utero but it does extend to the newborn baby. A circumcision in utero would be wrong to you, but killing the poor little guy in utero is ok to you. Makes no sense.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:05 AM
2

So circumcising an unborn baby is wrong, but killing him is ok?! Makes sense if your brain is malfunctioning I suppose…. You abortion supporters do the craziest mental backflips.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:59 AM
-5

I did my research and made my opinion on that basis. What more can you expect?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:49 AM
-7

Really. How so? Could you circumcise the fetus at 7 months in utero based on your moral sensibilities?! If not, why not?! You’re literally willing to destroy not only his penis but his entire body.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:52 PM
-25

Maybe. Just how much autonomy do we grant to babies? I’m fine with granting them the right to bodily autonomy if y’all would grant that aborting them is a SERIOUS INVASION OF BODILY AUTONOMY! Many anti circumcision people are pro abortion: that makes NO SENSE to me. “Don’t circumcise that boy, but you can rip him apart limb to limb and kill him by literally tearing him to pieces or stabbing him in the skull and sucking out his brain”. Bunch of nut cases…..
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:28 PM
-66

Nothing, because the studies are there to support that it’s not a problem, adult men who get circumcised are happy in the studies done, and there are millions of circumcised men who have no problems, including me. I am neutral about neonatal circumcision: neither for or against it but I do support the right for parents to do it. I think there is a lot of nocebo effect of neonatal circumcision on this forum, and it’s spreading through emotional histrionics. I have posted numerous studies in the p…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 10:38 PM
1

No, I am not. I am denying that circumcision is damaging or mutilating. I am not for or against infant circumcision. It’s up to the parents, plural. If one doesn’t want it, then it should not be done.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:51 AM
5

Used as directed, it’s easily 99.9% effective.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:00 AM
1

Well now you’re onto rational ground. I’m not arguing for routine neonatal circumcision, I am arguing against histrionics on the subject.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:58 AM
1

Studies belie that idea. Circumcision was well accepted by adult sexually actively African men in studies to reduce rates of HIV transmission.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:55 AM
4

Have you heard of contraception?
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:52 AM
0

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=adult+male+circumcision+and+penile+sensitivity+&oq=#d=gs_qabs&t=1656902650674&u=%23p%3DLA8ToabbGAQJ
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:44 AM
1

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=adult+male+circumcision+and+penile+sensitivity+&oq=#d=gs_qabs&t=1656902541435&u=%23p%3Dv5kflyn8QZsJ
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:43 AM
7

I said, rape is less than 1% of abortions. My belief is that a woman’s child, conceived in rape, is still her flesh and blood and she could choose to raise HER child or adopt it out.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:41 AM
2

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=adult+male+circumcision+and+penile+sensitivity+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1656902380889&u=%23p%3DKLBr9TD5ExUJ
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:40 AM
6

Huh? Women and men should use contraception if they don’t want children. It’s irresponsible to do otherwise. Killing a baby in utero is ghastly and immoral.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:38 AM
-1

Studies show that sensitivity is maintained in male circumcision. Use google scholar. Try a Cochrane review too. The bulk of evidence is that there is no loss. Clitoris surgery is totally different as I’m sure you know.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:33 AM
-12

Function and sensitivity are maintained, ergo, no mutilation.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:18 AM
9

Rape accounts for maybe 1% of abortions. I oppose abortion of a woman’s child created through rape. She can choose to raise her child or adopt it out.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:17 AM
-10

By definition, it is called circumcision. It is not mutilation by definition.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:16 AM
-2

The studies were of healthy men being circumcised to decrease rates of HIV transmission.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:15 AM
10

Straw men arguments and emotional garbage. Childbirth is no more medically risky than is abortion. Contraception is widely available, I suggest you use it. The life of the mother is never a reason for abortion; ectopic pregnancy treatment is not affected by anti abortion laws at all: Catholic hospitals have always and will always treat ectopic pregnancies.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:06 AM
-5

Sensitivity is not lost. Use google scholar for studies of adults circumcised in Africa that proved that.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:02 AM
4

We don’t all support abortion here at men’s rights. Some of us are very pro-life and have the science and philosophy background to know that the ontological essence of the product of conception at all stages is, by definition, a human life.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:44 AM
-22

Because nothing is “mutilated” in routine infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:29 AM
7

Um, women tend not to fight in wars. That’s a simple statement of fact. They do get raped in wars. And murdered. War sucks for everyone, but generally speaking, men are at the vanguard of protecting society. That’s how it should be.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:59 AM
1

Biden is now blocking new offshore drilling in both the Atlantic and Pacific coastlines. That’s going to help lower the price of oil lololol. You guys are amazingly dishonest. Get your Soros check and post some more nonsense!
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:28 PM
1

Maybe try reading alternative points of view. The facts are damning for Biden: https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/06/27/bidens-radical-anti-fossil-fuel-energy-policy-is-costing-americans-dearly/
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:50 AM
1

We are not a net exporter currently. Google search: The United States remained a net crude oil importer in 2021, importing about 6.11 million b/d of crude oil and exporting about 2.90 million b/d.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:40 AM
0

The LA Times is a left wing propaganda machine, yet this was their article: https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-oil-exporter-opec-20181206-story.html Biden did shut down many oil drilling permits. Fact. He ran on that platform genius.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:32 AM
0

Lol. Now you deny facts.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:43 PM
0

Under Trump we were a net oil exporter. Now we are a net oil importer again, genius.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:12 PM
1

He shut down drilling sites genius!
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:10 PM
1

Of course.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:51 PM
1

Biden shut down drilling rights for oil just as he said he would. Supply and demand, as you said.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:38 PM
1

You don’t make arguments, you make ad hominems. Typical for leftists. How about you explain the high gas prices and inflation without blaming trump? We had a good economy with trump.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:06 PM
1

You don’t make arguments, you make ad hominems. Typical for leftards.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:05 PM
2

You’re a Soros- paid bot.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:56 PM
3

That’s what I think about you.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:55 PM
4

The you get YOUR facts straight: Tucker eviscerates the Left all the time.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:36 PM
2

Because the economy is so good compared to trump presidency lolol.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:34 PM
1

The limp dicks?! That would be Biden DemoKKKRats.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:53 PM
2

Feminist Democrat, you are the problem.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:23 AM
1

All you feminist Democrats here, it looks like Tucker is over the target….
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:22 AM
-3

I love the guy. DemoKKKRats are the feminist party.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:21 AM
-3

Tucker is awesome, maybe you are the idiot.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:20 AM
4

There’s biological asymmetry baked into the cake, there’s no way to make reproduction “fair”. Women carry babies, that’s how it’s done, there is nothing “fair” about it. Feminists want to make everything equal and fair, that’s their first mistake.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:04 AM
0

They opted in, why do that? It’s pretty clear how to make a baby and how not to make a baby. Did you miss the instructions?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:49 PM
15

They said medical pre-existing condition. Non MDs should not be doing surgery.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:41 PM
1

I am not sure about your question. Maternity is easily proved, so no woman is usually forced to play parent to a child that is not biologically hers. Paternity is provable too now, so no male should be forced to financially support a child that is not his child. I am against abortion. I support responsible people having responsible sexual activity. People know how to prevent pregnancy and it’s not difficult to do. Be responsible in your behavior and you won’t be asked to raise a child that you d…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:38 PM
1

I agree that no government should force a non-biologically related male to be a father to a child whom his girlfriend or wife conceived with another man.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:44 PM
0

No, I brought up a logical retort to the OP. If you don’t want a baby, use contraception, it’s not rocket science.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:04 AM
0

It’s a factual comment, no deflection. It’s not even arguable.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:01 AM
0

Yep, that’s true too. So why do I have so many downvotes?!
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:07 PM
-27

You could always wear a condom and you could watch your gf swallow a pill every day. Chance of fatherhood? Approaching zero…..
/r/MensRights26/06/22 12:34 PM
9

Nobody will get pregnant if they are responsible people and use contraception. Is that too hard for some people?! Are they stupid?! (Rape is not what drives elective abortions, we all know that, it’s a red herring argument).
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:21 PM
2

Lol.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:35 PM
4

Two sides of the same coin sometimes.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:49 PM
1

Not everybody wants to display his or her nudity in a public prank; normal people understand that.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:56 PM
1

You are confused, that’s obvious: “However, while the occasional politician or news reporter will still indicate that late-term abortions are most often performed in the case of “severe fetal anomalies” or to “save the woman’s life,” the trajectory of the peer-reviewed research literature has been obvious for decades: most late-term abortions are elective, done on healthy women with healthy fetuses, and for the same reasons given by women experiencing first trimester abortions.”
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:02 PM
2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457018/
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:23 AM
2

It’s a D and C and not an abortion Einstein. Sheesh.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:40 AM
2

That statement gives zero medically indicated scenarios. ACOG is a trade organization that protects abortionists. I know many OBs personally who have said that delivering a fetus prematurely is safest for the mother. An abortion is physically more risky to the mother. (ACOG is including psychological health in their assessment too, not just medical health).
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:42 AM
7

A). Guttmacher is a tendentious pro choice institute. B). The abortion rate for actual rape would be very low, and the debate is about elective abortions sought as a contraceptive technique and not for rape. Would you be ok with laws that allowed it only for rape that was reported within 48 hours to the police?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:38 AM
1

No, the abstract said that only 11% of these cases of rape sought immediate medical or police help. That makes it likely that many were not real rape but rather date rape scenarios where consent might be ambiguous or debatable. It’s not rare for women to claim that they were pressured into sex and later call that event rape, when the male gives a different account. That’s why the claimed rape rate of 25% of college females is a totally false statistic.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:35 AM
4

Clearly you have no reasoning abilities.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:31 AM
2

What is irrelevant? The fact that women don’t need surgical abortions to save their lives for health reasons is quite relevant genius.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:21 AM
0

We are talking about surgical abortions genius. My point stands: abortion is never needed for the life of the mother. A miscarriage has nothing to do with the abortion debate genius.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:19 AM
1

I know that abortion is never needed for saving the life of the mother. An ectopic pregnancy termination is not an abortion by definition.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:17 AM
4

I’m not embarrassed that you found one study, the details of which are unknown to us both.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:13 AM
2

I can only read the abstract. The devil is in the details of claimed rape episodes. Many women declare date rape after the fact even though the sex was consensual when the male is interviewed. I’d like to know if these were real rapes. Why so few police reports and why so few treatments in the immediate aftermath?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:13 AM
2

You don’t know Medicine.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:10 AM
2

The safest idea is to treat her medical condition, stabilize it, and deliver a premature infant when needed and when safest for her. Abortion is never needed.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:09 AM
4

It’s very low, less than 1%.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:07 AM
1

I never claimed that.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:07 AM
5

Where did you get that statistic? I would bet that it’s a fake stat.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:07 AM
-1

No, you are the moron. The safest thing is to deliver a premature baby, mister genius.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:05 AM
4

A miscarriage that is completed is not an abortion genius. Good grief you know nothing.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:04 AM
-2

Abortion is NEVER needed for her life being at risk.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:02 AM
11

Rape accounts for very few abortions. Straw man argument.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:02 AM
7

Non religious ppl often do not support abortion. It’s a matter of biology and philosophy too.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:01 AM
1

No, the founding fathers gave us the right to bear arms. Even DemoKKKRats supported that for most of their insidious existence.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:26 AM
0

Surviving “on your own” means nothing regarding your ontological essence. A newborn cannot live on its own. In fact, most adult humans cannot “live on their own”.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 12:04 AM
0

A parasite lives off its host. How is that hard for you to understand? Biologists make the point that a fetus is basically a parasite, biologically speaking. How do you not understand that a fetus is a separate being?! The genetics are different from the mother. How can the fetus be a part of the mother when it has different genes and is expelled?! Nobody claims otherwise except you lol.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:06 PM
0

False. The fetus is not a part of the mother immunologically or genetically, it occupies a space outside the mother’s body in the same biological sense as the alimentary canal being external to our organisms. The fetus will be expelled from a cavity that it external to the mother. The placenta is a barrier between the mother’s body and the fetus’s body. It allows transfer of molecules from the fetus to the mother. Biologically, the fetus is a parasite on the mother. Genetically it is quite disti…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:45 PM
0

Newborn babies are dependent on adults for survival. So are people on ventilators. That proves nothing. A fetus is an ontologically, biologically, genetically, and immunologically distinct creature from the mother. It is human, alive, and therefore a human being.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:20 PM
0

False dichotomy that you made. We can solve all of the world’s problems through mass suicide, total annihilation of human life. Problems solved!
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:18 PM
-1

Calling a thing a fetus doesn’t change its ontology. Fail. It’s a living being, and human, and not the mother’s body.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:52 PM
-1

I’m pro life and pro men and pro family.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:51 PM
8

Nope, not with you on this. I oppose abortion:
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:12 PM
2

Who is Brittany Higgins?
/r/MensRights21/06/22 11:16 AM
37

On Mother’s Day, women get flowers and gifts from their children and husband. On Father’s Day, men get nothing. It’s routinely true. All my friends remark about it.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 11:12 AM
0

I’m a great father lol, just ask me. I said, women make better mothers. It’s a literal statement that is literally true by definition.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 02:58 AM
0

You’re the one who took all kinds of straw men arguments personally. I never spoke against anything that you said. Not one word of what you said. Good grief. Take a chill pill.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 02:25 AM
0

Take the chip off your shoulder, nobody said anything against you. Seems like you’re the one with the issues.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 02:17 AM
1

Um, okay, whatever….keep repeating it to yourself: “girl power, girl power, girl power….”
/r/MensRights18/06/22 02:09 AM
1

I live near a military base. I respectfully disagree because the men tell me that the women are a drain on the unit. I’m not making this up.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 12:11 AM
1

I’m sorry that happened to you, it sounds like you have a couple women who were good to you. I doubt that you’re ugly, kids sure can be cruel about stuff.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 08:58 PM
1

Was your experience without a father “generalizable” to most boys raised in female households? What was bad about it?
/r/MensRights17/06/22 07:59 PM
1

Agree. I am not arguing, however, that biological differences make women unaccountable, I am arguing that women are better mothers than dads are! Dads are better fathers. We can argue incessantly about differing roles in particular circumstances, but clearly biology points to mothers generally being the primary caregivers of infants and children. It is strange that is even arguable these days, but then again, everything under the sun is arguable these days…..
/r/MensRights17/06/22 05:31 PM
2

I think that the nomograms for weight are too low. A person is called “overweight” by medical professionals even if they are average. Average should be normal. There is no evidence that packing a few extra pounds over the so-called “limit” is unhealthy or contributes to disease. Most men have a “gut” by the time they’re 50.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:52 PM
0

I’m sorry if you feel insulted, it wasn’t meant to be insulting.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:33 PM
3

Yes. Apparently it’s a pejorative around here.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:31 PM
17

TradCon here…. Apparently being tradcon is a Bad Thing on this site, but I know many wonderful women who haven’t bought into the feminist narrative, even as they go about their lives doing great and wonderful things. Keep an open mind and heart….they’re out there.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 12:06 PM
1

You raised many great points. I don’t have a solution to put the toothpaste back into the tube. But you nailed it when you said that women are taking over roles that traditionally belonged to men, but women are NOT taking the dirty work roles like military or back-breaking labor positions like construction and heavy industry and plumbing and jack-hammering concrete in 100 degree heat….. I feel like it’s time for laborers to demand that the government stop subsidizing the professions and universi…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:40 AM
1

We should oppose the narrative that gender is fluid or that sex differences don’t exist.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:32 AM
0

No. Some of us here at Men’s Rights are Tradcons. We aren’t the enemy.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:26 AM
1

Huh?! Who wants young boys in military?! I never promoted any such thing, and any “culture” which does is not deserving of the appellation. Women can certainly serve in support roles.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:17 AM
-1

My argument would be to go back to sex roles as most societies did for millennia. It seemed to work rather well. It works very well for many societies and even many western families. Only recently in history did we get the crazy idea that men and women are equal in everything.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:15 AM
-1

My father fought in WW2 at the ripe age of 18. He marched across France in the dead of winter and was in the Battle of the Bulge. I am not the man that he apparently was, and make no claim to be a “combat soldier” kind of guy. But the Army put those young men into positions that best suited them, and this was done ad hoc in very trying circumstances. I trust that most men would have some role to play in a dire situation and that the military leaders can use different abilities for different func…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:01 AM
1

I said in one post that men are more suited for combat than women are, generally speaking. Generally speaking, that’s a fact. You made up a statement that really makes no sense.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 10:54 AM
2

I’ve traveled a lot. Americans are no fatter than other citizens of other countries.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:46 AM
4

False. Men carry heavy backpacks in combat zones, and women are a drain on the men. Ask any man who served in combat.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:32 AM
-16

The problem with this plan is that women are not suited for combat. And war will never go away, look at ukraine, look at the recent history of the world. Let’s go back to sex roles. What a novel idea! (It’s as old as humanity).
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:00 AM
1

In a weird way, I’d like to see that succeed so that women finally admit that there are sex roles, they are not suited for combat, and they need to go back to being loving wives and mothers. (Yes, I’m a dreaded “tradcon”.)
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:58 AM
-3

Agree. Tradcons have the only viable option: men belong in the military, women in supportive roles. “Women are better at being mothers” than men are. Is that now considered to be “hate speech”? Sexist?! Good grief.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:48 AM
-5

Biology doesn’t care what you think. For thousands of years, biology and culture worked in lockstep to create male vs female roles in almost every corner of the planet, and in almost every culture. It is only modern Westerners who think that they can pretend otherwise. At 3 am in a winter storm, it’s going to be a man who climbs a pole in dangerous conditions to get the electricity back on. You would grant special privileges to women to get the professional jobs while leaving that hard labor to …
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:27 AM
-6

Tradcons recognize that women are more suited for some things than men are, generally speaking, and men are more suited for other things than women are, generally speaking. That’s just a fact.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:17 AM
-4

I’m a tradcon and completely disagree. Feminists don’t care about you or your fake equality mantra. Women don’t WANT equality, they want special privileges. I stand against that and FOR sanity in recognizing biology.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 12:05 AM
5

Toxic feminism is insane. How much should we bet that most of these women were raised by single moms, or if not, had an abusive father?
/r/MensRights16/06/22 02:11 PM
4

No, she’s a conservative.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 01:30 AM
25

Nope. I want my T levels normal and physiologic.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:32 PM
1

Ok, you merely stated what I did in an earlier post. But classical equity feminism is dead. It only exists in small pockets like Christina Hoff Sommers’ consciousness and a few other feminine women who are public intellectuals. By the term “feminism” is meant the modern reigning version. It would be like me calling myself a liberal in the classical sense just because I support representative government and economic freedom and free speech. Modern liberalism is so far removed from the classical v…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 10:25 AM
1

No, Wikipedia pointed out that feminist leaders deny that she is a feminist. Her writings defend traditional female roles, and that’s not modern feminism at all. Sorry, you lose.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 12:15 AM
1

Then eschew all labels altogether, because she AIN’T NO FEMINIST. ‘Twould be like Jimmy Carter calling himself a conservative just because modern liberals are farther to the left than he is. That dog won’t hunt. Carter is a liberal, was a liberal, will always be a liberal. You can’t just apply labels Willy Nilly. Christina Hoff Sommers desires that her brand of feminism be the reigning brand, but it isn’t.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 08:11 PM
1

From Wikipedia: Sommers' positions and writing have been characterized by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as "equity feminism", a classical-liberal or libertarian feminist perspective holding that the main political role of feminism is to ensure that the right against coercive interference is not infringed.[10] Sommers has contrasted equity feminism with what she terms victim feminism and gender feminism,[11][12] arguing that modern feminist thought often contains an "irrational hostilit…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 10:41 AM
1

Self identification is not the only metric by which to label someone. I’ve read her stuff and she’s a conservative. It’s like a classical liberal vs a modern progressive. Christina is an old school conservative feminist who promotes what she believe is the real feminism. Well that label won’t be accepted by modern feminists any more than my saying that I’m an old school liberal in that I support the liberal order of economic freedom and representative government versus the right of kings and ser…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 10:40 AM
5

I can’t post a single thing on a feminist Reddit site without being kicked off. What does that tell you?! And no, I didn’t flame or troll, I made a statement that is well within two standard deviations of the norm for men, if not smack dab in the middle, and I got kicked off. Just go to badwomensanatomy or femaledatingstrategies and you will see radical man hatred. All I did was tell the latter gals to quit calling “low quality men” the pejorative that they use routinely: “scrotes”. Now how insa…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:07 AM
0

She’s not a “feminist”. She promotes the “feminine”, big difference.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:01 AM
2

Bear. Bear the risks.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 07:48 PM
7

Agreed!
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:50 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:09 PM
-13

There is some home care education required for both newly circumcised and uncircumcised babies, so it’s a nursing educational “concern”, and you all should not be so concerned at its listing as a concern.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 02:23 AM
8

Best area on earth.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 02:20 AM
1

She’s dead wrong.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 12:07 AM
1

Hated some of them. Scolding ninnies. Some were cool.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 12:02 AM
5

Rubin is disgusting and deserves to be called out. This forum is designed to do just that.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:08 AM
1

Try thinking for one millisecond, monkey: up to and including the third grade, no kid of mine is going to have a discussion about his sexuality, your sexuality, the teacher’s sexuality, my sexuality, any sexuality, with the teacher. Comprende?
/r/MensRights03/06/22 09:36 AM
0

So you don’t know. I knew that.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 09:27 AM
0

Read the law. Write it out on this forum.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:49 AM
11

I’m sorry to hear that.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:48 AM
2

“Too”. “Too incompetent to teach”: Teachers were barred from discussing sexuality with children, so your question is not germane at all. Nobody said that teachers are “too incompetent to teach”. What was written into law is that teachers may not discuss sexual identity issues with children. That is expected by most parents and is the law in Florida.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 04:32 AM
8

No thanks, I’ll fight my own battles, but I appreciate your concern.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 02:42 AM
1

Discussing with children their sexual identities at age 4-8 is not part of the curriculum. That’s easy to understand. Butt out of the parents’ responsibilities.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:56 PM
1

Teachers should teach real subjects, not gender nonsense to children. You obviously are educationally deficient to begin with.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:55 PM
4

Indeed, I agree! People have lost the ability to THINK about incentives and consequences of social policies.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:54 PM
56

Wives used to support their husbands, now they emasculate them.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:23 PM
2

All sociological studies are subject to bias.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:44 PM
3

Hospital charges are not the same as what is actually paid by the insurance company. The actual agreed payment is likely one fourth of the charges.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 08:29 AM
2

How many of those countries are you willing to move to? I’ll take my chances here in America. Most of Europe is not nearly as idyllic as our media portray.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:38 AM
3

/sarc?
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:27 AM
0

Amen!
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:31 PM
11

Queens have waged war. I mean real life actual queens of countries/territories have waged war. Plenty of female islamist supremacists support jihad.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:23 PM
11

Not gonna subscribe or give them my email. What is the gist of the article?! It’s behind a paywall.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:54 PM
1

Biden/Harris? Bwahahahahaha! Libtards are so stupid.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:33 PM
8

Was it ever on the rails?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 08:36 PM
1

Good grief. Conservative women are much happier than liberal ones, I’m sure of that.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:21 PM
2

Expose your breasts all you want to, just don’t demand that nobody notices them when talking to you. Women look at men too, it’s just that they pretend that they don’t. Heck, fully clothed, heterosexual women would likely glance at exposed female breasts more than men would….because they could get away with it more easily and because women are sexual creatures who are no less “visual” than men are, despite protests to the contrary. And curiosity is not gender-specific. A sister-in-law remarked t…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:22 PM
8

It’s not a fact. Women have all the privileges of men and then some in America. You’re deluded.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:09 PM
1

Explain.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:01 PM
3

Post the first paragraph of the article. Then see what people think.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 12:59 PM
3

Yeah that makes sense. If kids insult other kids by calling them “mentally challenged “, then it will become verboten to say that phrase, and we will have to invent another one again.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:17 PM
3

Do you think it is offensive? Years ago it was acceptable and commonly used. I wonder if saying that someone is “mentally challenged” will eventually be considered rude and then we will have to find another new word, rinse, repeat. Retarded means “behind”. Behind seems less insulting than “challenged”, since you can always catch up if you’re behind….
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:50 AM
6

It’s time for laborers to demand that the government stop subsidizing white collar careers that favor women over blue collar jobs that men are more capable of doing. There’s no reason that a professor of sociology makes more money for less demanding work than a guy building a house or jack hammering concrete. But the government throws a ton of money at education, and over-inflates the cost of education and the value of the teachers that way. A ton of money also goes toward the field of medicine,…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 09:56 AM
1

Um, we have things called privacy laws. How could I give you “cases?” There’s a thing called “google”. You “google” stuff and get information. That’s what I did to learn that yes, kids are getting hormonal therapy to transition. We even had a case where the father tried to stop it through the legal system.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:49 PM
1

Oh ffs. Follow a conversation maybe…..we are not talking about hormonal therapy for medical conditions.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:32 PM
1

It is legal in many states to give hormonal therapy to minors with parents’ permission. Many activists want to stop parents from having any ability to give or withhold consent whatsoever. It would be illegal to name specific patients who did the transgender thing unless they publicize it themselves. Use google for specific laws in America.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:26 AM
1

Kids are being given hormonal therapy to transgender them. That’s a fact.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:32 AM
2

There is definitely hormonal therapy aimed at helping a person trans-gender, as opposed to hormonal therapy that promotes the biological sex of the patient being treated. Stop lying and maybe I will respect your superiority at foreign language learning.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:02 AM
3

Demagogues. And it is not illegal to give hormonal transgender therapy to people under 18.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:53 AM
5

Agree completely. My kids don’t give a flying F about Father’s Day. And yes, I am a great Dad, just ask me.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:18 PM
1

I go by Master of the Universe and I go Ballistic if people don’t agree.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:23 PM
2

So normal everyday life has to be made more complex by narcissists who insist on being called pronouns that objectively don’t apply to them?! If you want to dress and look like a man, but also want to get frosty at people just because someone called you a “he”, you are clearly being a jerk. And you don’t get to expect me to learn your names and pronouns both, I’d have to have a booklet with me to remember who goes by what. Learning names alone is sufficient trouble. The real jerks are clowns who…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:05 PM
6

Oh brother. Accommodate everyone for whatever they want, right?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 03:06 AM
9

I want to be referred to as Master of the Universe. It’s no big deal, right?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 03:05 AM
1

Yeah, but street crime has more faces than murder. I’m told that London is not what it used to be. I would like a more muscular England to come back, with confidence in its past, and a less feminized and self-flagellating culture of guilt and shame over perceived and real past mistakes. Where are all the good men?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:44 AM
1

Sorry, some of my responses crossed paths with yours. Anyway, the world owes a debt of gratitude to GB for improving and civilizing much of the world in a good way. But you guys have lost your self-confidence. All you have now is shame over colonization. Your Rotherham and Manchester rape culture groomed and raped thousands of girls over many years! Those stats were ignored and would make America’s stats look not so bad at all. You are descending into third world status, as is America. Political…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:03 AM
1

Almost Nobody gets life without parole. Bleeding heart liberals give them parole all the time, even after so-called life sentences.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:52 AM
7

I don’t think that woke companies or publications care about “our” opinions. They will take their circulations down to a bottomless pit and not give a flip. ESPN, NYTs, Newsweek, Washington Post, LATimes, etc all have terrible numbers, and getting worse, but rich liberals who own them just don’t care.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:41 AM
1

Besides, I love England for what you once were: cultured barbarians who civilized the world. Now you’re just cultured barbarians. We Americans are uncultured barbarians and we like it that way. Cheers.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 11:14 PM
1

Per capita or total? We number 360+ million. Don’t get me wrong, we are descending to your levels very rapidly. We might even achieve third world status before you do.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 11:12 PM
1

As I said, rotherham and Manchester rape cultures were not even counted by your stats or the police in your second world country.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:57 PM
34

Of all things to demand gender parity for…..good grief maybe we need a world war to give us something important to worry about. Oh yeah, Russia invaded ukraine…..but let’s whine about naming bugs.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:47 PM
1

Lol. You guys have clergy sex abuse just the same, but with the addition of citizen rape gangs.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:44 PM
1

You don’t measure your stuff. Rotherham rape culture?! We never had any such thing.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:38 PM
1

No, it isn’t. England is going to pot. You guys hide crime stats really well.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:30 PM
1

No, we actually measure our crime stats. You guys hide things like the rape culture of Manchester England.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:29 PM
1

You need to execute murderers. Your Crown is a joke, and democracy is a joke. There’s a reason that democrats spend money they don’t have, it’s because voters are really stupid. They also stupidly allow murderers to re-offend by giving them jail sentences that expire. If the death penalty were swift and frequent, it would be a deterrent. Instead it is always appealed and never applied.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:58 PM
-5

The Crown?! Lol. The citizens?! GB is a cesspool, worse than America, which is saying a lot. Maybe crime would be less if criminals actually got punished.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:12 PM
-6

Says you.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:59 PM
-6

Do you really believe there are cases where we don’t have complete epistemic certitude as to guilt?! Good grief, enough with the nonsense about innocent people getting the death penalty, it’s so rare as to be nigh impossible these days. We have DNA evidence, video evidence, admissions of guilt, and requests to be put to death, yet bleeding heart goofs wanna demand that the guilty just get a jail sentence.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:38 PM
15

Mae modesty is totally ignored. Look online for many stories from men who were mistreated by doctors and nurses regarding lack of privacy issues.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:32 PM
12

You’re way out of line here. Breast cancer er is NOT a significant contributor to male morbidity/mortality. Prostate cancer is a huge contributor and should receive more research finding in line with breast cancer. You’re the one who should be reported for harassment.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:30 PM
1

Thanks. I wonder if there are any rights enumerated there that create male-female tension. I will read it when I have some time.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:48 PM
1

So what rights are codified for women specifically in European countries? Are they sex specific? Where do universal rights come from and who has the list?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 11:22 AM
9

But you agreed that women are having their “rights” met rather well. (“Rights” in quotes; are these “universal human rights” or US Constitutional rights? What rights do people really possess outside of legal documents such as the Constitution?).
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:41 AM
47

Feminism advanced in opposition to men. The tension is real and not imaginary. We can’t just wish the tension away with good intentions, sorry. It’s unlikely that a working document could even be produced by this group in general agreement about what constitutes the major issues we want resolved and how exactly we want them resolved. We can, however, identify many of the issues where women are given priority over men and try to address them here. Example: title 9 college kangaroo rape courts. We…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:30 AM
0

Ectopic pregnancy is always allowed to Have termination even in catholic hospitals, so that is a lie.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 09:41 PM
2

You mean the .01% of the time? The times that somebody didn’t use as directed?! There are women who use abortion as birth control. The vast majority, by far, of abortions are for convenience and due to irresponsible behavior.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 09:39 PM
1

Agreed. No argument there.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:12 PM
2

99.9% effective when used as directed. Not very hard. Female Take pill daily. Male Wear condom. Do both and the chance of pregnancy is nil.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:35 AM
1

It’s free. Fail.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:16 AM
14

True. And even the men posting here mostly support a woman’s “right to choose”. She chose when she had unprotected sex. How hard is it to use birth control?! Not hard. How effective is properly used birth control? Very effective: 99.9%.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 07:17 AM
0

Try birth control, it’s a thing and it works.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 06:24 AM
-8

They circumcised over 2000 sexually active adult men. What better measure than subjective sexual sensation and ability would there be?! You really are strange.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:48 AM
-1

Um, it’s right there: “neonatal circumcision is a simpler procedure and has a very low rate of adverse events, which are usually minor….” WHO supports male circumcision, and says that neonatal is safest. Plain as day.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:47 AM
-6

We are not buddies. I believe in scientific studies, so no troglodyte here…..
/r/MensRights07/05/22 02:02 AM
-14

No, you were not. Studies belie that statement. Adult males who were circumcised mostly notice NO DIFFERENCE. Stop worrying about that.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:24 PM
2

Try being responsible. Use BCPs and a condom. Easy peasy.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:19 PM
0

Adult men state IN STUDIES what they experience: no difference after circumcision. I’m sorry that fact bothers you.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:14 PM
0

I never whined, I merely stated. Big difference.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:56 PM
1

Read their report.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:44 PM
0

Your histrionics are belied by the facts. That is all that I am saying. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43749/9789241596169_eng.pdf;jsessionid=2495DF0C8DEE53057832D3205AD3400E?sequence=1
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:18 PM
-1

“There is substantial evidence that male circumci- sion protects against several diseases, including urinary tract infections, syphilis, chancroid and inva- sive penile cancer, as well as HIV. However, as with any surgical procedure, there are risks involved. Neonatal circumcision is a simpler procedure than adolescent or adult circumcision and has a very low rate of adverse events, which are usually minor (0.2–0.4%). Adolescent or adult circumcision can be associated with bleeding, haematoma or…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:17 PM
0

I did not say for neonates. However, it’s easier on neonates than adolescent boys and adult men. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978-92-4-000854-0
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:14 PM
-8

The WHO recommends circumcision. I am fine with the decision to do it or not do it, but you guys want to ban it, which is the opposite of world health organization opinion.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:51 PM
1

Bye.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:37 PM
-1

The WHO is not made up of doctors with expertise on male circumcision? WHO knew? (No pun intended). The WHO is still recommending male circumcision. I don’t know what it means to post research that I’m “not familiar with”. That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:23 PM
-17

I think this subject doesn’t belong here. It’s based on pure emotion and victimhood. Male circumcision is a nothing burger., yawn. Lots of adult men have it done and if it really affected things, we would know by now. It doesn’t. The study that I cited is a good one, there are plenty of others.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 07:38 PM
-25

That’s false. Studies of adult males who get circumcised show no loss of sexual function or pleasure. http://www.tuleoffice.com/images/editor/File/pdf/book/IMPOTENCY/2%20(5).pdf There are other meta analyses of various studies showing the same. I get flamed all the time saying this, but facts are facts.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:26 PM
1

Nonsense. The “magical mass” of meissner corpuscles in the foreskin don’t really add to the pleasure sensation. Histology is not clinical biology. Clinically, circumcision does not adversely affect adult male sexual functioning. Many studies show that. You ask for studies, I give you the best studies done, and you deny the studies. Then you wonder why I say “do your own research”. Goodbye. You have the narrative and victimhood you seek, just like the feminists we oppose, enjoy wallowing in it.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 07:48 AM
1

It’s not pure conjecture. And it doesn’t matter. The people circumcised were happy they had it done. That is the result, deal with it.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 07:44 AM
1

I gave you citations. I still think you should learn to do your own research.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:57 AM
1

I cited plenty of studies. I just want people to do their own research because every study incite gets criticized and often deleted. Find a grown-up argument.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:56 AM
1

A). They did not need a control stem to begin with. In an observational study, if 98% of circumcised adult men of that large a group size report sexual satisfaction post circumcision, there’s enough evidence in that alone to tell us that circumcision does not adversely affect sexual activity or pleasure. B). The control group was not circumcised for two years after the start of the study, allowing enough time for there to be a signal of adverse events in the circumcised group to stop the circumc…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:55 AM
1

Sigh. Men are more likely to commit some crimes than women. That’s a fact. It’s not a judgment.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 09:02 PM
1

I didn’t claim anything about men did I?! I am an MRA. I made a point about statistics didn’t I?! I was very clear.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 08:36 PM
1

Hmmm… that’s poor form.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:59 PM
0

http://www.tuleoffice.com/images/editor/File/pdf/book/IMPOTENCY/2%20(5).pdf
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:46 PM
0

http://www.tuleoffice.com/images/editor/File/pdf/book/IMPOTENCY/2%20(5).pdf Are you happy now?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:00 PM
2

http://www.tuleoffice.com/images/editor/File/pdf/book/IMPOTENCY/2%20(5).pdf Now sit down and calm down.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:59 PM
2

I was of course referring to FGM that mimics removal of male foreskin, ie, circumcision of the clitoral prepuce. Its removal is much more damaging to sexual functioning than is removal of the foreskin. Volume considerations alone make them totally not parallel phenomena. Studies of adult males circumcised as adults show no loss of sexual enjoyment. http://www.tuleoffice.com/images/editor/File/pdf/book/IMPOTENCY/2%20(5).pdf
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:59 PM
-1

Adult males who are circumcised notice no difference. Do you own research please and thank you. Here’s from Wikipedia: The foreskin may become subject to a number of pathological conditions.[3] Because of this, the World Health Organization and some other medical organizations have recommended circumcision as a prophylactic health intervention against disease.[4][5] Other medical organziations have dissented from this position.[6][7]
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:43 PM
0

Um, local anesthetic works great for that procedure. Why would it not? That makes no sense. Mucous membranes are easily anesthetized that way.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:41 PM
-2

Download “google scholar” and do your own research. That’s how I came to my beliefs, thanks. I cited some articles in previous posts below and that’s all I’m going to do. I found that people believe what they want to believe despite all the citations available. They find conflicting reports and trust only them. Try being objective, I know it’s hard for some of you intactivists.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:07 PM
1

I posted two. There are tons of articles. Please do your own research and see both sides. That’s all I’m Asking.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:02 PM
1

Here’s another: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=adult+circumcision+in+Africa+and+sexual+satisfaction+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1651762855146&u=%23p%3D9BM0bJRgK-EJ
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:01 PM
-1

Can’t you people do your own research? Here’s one: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:59 PM
1

That’s all wrong. If any MD did it that way he’d be totally outside of standard protocols.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:55 PM
0

Wow. Amazing. Ok, when exactly does a zygote/embryo/fetus develop personhood to you, and what biological transition point determines that personhood?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 12:04 AM
1

Anesthetic is applied in America always. I know a neonatologist who has personally been a leader of promoting that for the last 20 years.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:59 PM
1

Female circumcision is damaging to the clitoris, ipso facto. That is not the case in male circumcision. I am for whatever the parents want for their child in the case of male neonatal circumcision, and nothing will change my mind. I’ve done my due diligence on the subject, I’ve studied it, I’ve lived it, I’ve seen it, I’ve had my sons go through it. It’s a personal preference issue and that’s all there is to that. What amazes me is that the very same people who demand the right to abortion insis…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 10:45 PM
0

I’ve posted tons before, only to have the activists claim they are false. I’m not going to do the research again and again and again. Google scholar will take you only minutes to do your own research. Maybe you will learn something.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:57 PM
1

A fetus is living, and it is human. Therefore, it is a human being. It is genetically, immunologically, biologically, and ontologically distinct from the mother. Its dependence on the mother does not change the fact that it is a human creature or being distinct from the mother. A person on a ventilator is still a human being, as is a person on a cardiac bypass machine. Good grief you use nonsense ideas by which to categorize and dehumanize human beings.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:40 PM
0

Use google scholar and you will find many articles supporting the claim that circumcision does not cause loss of sexual functioning. Also, you will find articles that show lower rates of STD transmission and lower rates of HIV transmission. We are now into dueling studies and at an impasse. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:37 PM
-5

Studies from Africa on adults circumcised belie that claim.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:35 PM
1

Way not. Very much not. And yes, it’s a pejorative.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:30 PM
-12

Statistically, boyfriends of a mother harm kids at a much higher rate than other parties harm kids. But there is definite and huge overlap. The overlap is why these kinds of debates about groups rage on and on: Overlapping bell curves. Example: the bell curves of strength or intelligence of men vs women overlap, but the male is shifted to one side (in the case of strength) or is broader (in the case of intelligence). These sociological/psychological/physical/cultural/ethnic phenomena of overlapp…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:27 PM
-5

Well, lots of studies confirm my statements. I’m tired of this debate, many millions of happily circumcised men exist and studies have proven that their sexual functioning is fine. Female circumcision has caused functional damage to thousands of women, that’s a fact too. But do cling to your victimhood, we “all” need to feel like victims these days, but count me out. I’m here for the real issues, not this stupid anti-circ nonsense.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:57 PM
-9

Nope. A clitoris cannot be circumcised without functional damage. A penis can, and is, and has been circumcised for millennia without any detrimental effects. Don’t let facts get in the way of your victimhood, after all, we need to invent victimization like feminists do if we can’t find enough already.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:46 PM
1

Chiropractor?! Please, you can call me lots of names, but that’s really beyond the pale.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:38 PM
0

Science textbooks do not state anything about neonatal circumcision that in any way reflects the nonsense peddled here by intactivists. Many science articles support that circumcision statistically has medical benefits, not enough to require it, but certainly enough to allow it. There are conflicting data, but many studies show no significant detriments to circumcision for the vast majority of men. Google scholar has a ton of research articles supporting my statements. I recognize that (tendenti…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:37 PM
1

Men are tested first for infertility because that’s easiest and cheapest.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:29 PM
-8

I’m a religious whack-a-doodle, but circumcision is NOT required by my religion, to wit: Christianity. However, I support the right of parents to choose to circumcise their male infants and I resent the intactivists here who believe all kinds of crazy nonsense about neonatal circumcision. All political agitation groups have in-group fights, and that’s ok. We can still support Men’s rights together to oppose the feminist fascists. We don’t have to agree about circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:20 PM
1

All lies and nonsense. Men cannot reliably contracept other than condoms and vasectomy. And I think any responsible man would wear a condom and any responsible woman would insist on that, and/or take her BCP which are over 99% effective if used as directed. As for definitions, calling something a “fetus” (which is Latin for “baby” by the way) does not change its ontological essence, to wit: a human being separate and distinct from the mother. Dehumanizing a thing with names is typical of crazy k…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:11 PM
-2

Bad analogies. FGM is totally different. I think your other example is quite insane.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:30 AM
-1

Take a chill pill. My sons are happy that they are circumcised. Sorry that bothers you.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:19 AM
-2

Circumcision has been done for centuries. It’s fine, calm down.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:17 AM
-2

False. Used AS DIRECTED, the BCPs are 99.9% effective. Look it up online. In practice, people are too irresponsible to get it to that level because they skip their doses. Add a condom, and you can’t get pregnant.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:50 PM
-1

Why are simple factual statements downvoted?! It’s because some people want do what they want to do regardless of the irresponsibility of their behavior. “We wanna have unprotected sex and then abort our babies that we made!” Whiney little devils.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 09:22 PM
0

Nope, but then again, no infant ever asked to be born either! Life starts out unfair and it’s downhill from there. Nobody asked me if I wanted brown or blue eyes, antibiotics for ear infections, appendectomy for appendicitis, to go to school, to wear clothes or not, to speak English or German instead, to be born into poverty or aristocracy,……the list of horrible impositions on children is endless.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 09:04 PM
-3

You have the right to reproduce or not already. It’s quite simple. Did you ever take a health class?! Have your GF take a BCP daily or wear a condom. Do both, and you won’t reproduce ever. Easy peasy. (The pill alone taken as directed is 99.99% effective. The .01% failures are in women who lie about taking as directed).
/r/MensRights03/05/22 09:01 PM
0

The hospitals would probably be glad to give up all circumcisions from a financial point of view and do other things instead. This is silly nonsense discussion. The real money is in other specialities and OR procedures. Look at surgi-centers: ortho, cataract surgery, colonoscopies and upper endoscopies, those pay off. Circumcision does not pay well, it doesn’t lend itself to assembly line type of efficiencies. There are no advertisements for it lol. Come on use your brain.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 08:55 PM
0

Death rates of minor procedures under local anesthesia in America are exceedingly low, nil even. That’s a fact. The few deaths attributed to many such procedures are coincidental and due to other morbidities that impacted the patient. An MI in the “recovery” area after a topical anesthesia minor procedure on a 300 pound 55 year old smoker is often incidental to the procedure itself, and not a cause and effect relationship.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 08:52 PM
-1

It’s not a money maker ffs.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 07:51 PM
-3

Adults get voluntarily circumcised all the time.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 07:51 PM
-6

Correlation is not causation. Those deaths were not caused by the circumcision per se, good grief.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 07:50 PM
-2

Circumcision is not done like cataract surgery, which is like factory assembly line surgery. It’s just not a big money maker, sorry that bothers you, it bothers the doctors too, because the procedure is a nuisance procedure it eats valuable time given the low reimbursement.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:25 PM
-12

My sons are glad that they’re circumcised. One laughed about sensitivity issues. “Who needs more sensitivity” he asked?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:22 PM
1

Ablation is a huge industry and not driven by correct contraception usage but rather by non usage.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:02 PM
-9

I have four circumcised boys and that never happened. Tissue cannot be sold by federal Law without permission. Payments are minimal.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:59 PM
-5

Typical insurance payout is a few hundred dollars.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:58 PM
-6

It’s a very UN lucrative procedure. It’s done for the convenience of the moms and their preferences, the doctors don’t even wanna do them, it pays so low.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:14 PM
-7

Agreed! I have never heard of or saw a circumcision related death in 25 years or practicing Medicine. I am not an OB gyn but I have colleagues who are, neonatologists colleagues, pediatrician colleagues, and none of them have ever read a report or heard of a report on any deaths ever. These lies by intactivists have to stop. I once did a literature search and could find no reports either.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:12 PM
-9

That is totally false. There are NOT anywhere near 117 deaths from neonatal circumcision in the USA annually. Utter lies and nonsense.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:09 PM
25

Be responsible and you won’t “knock up a girl.”
/r/MensRights03/05/22 11:07 AM
21

Maybe people will act responsibly when they can’t just kill their babies in utero.. Contraception is easy and cheap. How hard is it to use a pill daily and a condom?! It’s not. And don’t even tell me that abortion is routinely done for contraception failure, which is 99.99% effective when done as directed.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 11:07 AM
7

She’s psycho.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 08:16 PM
6

They hate conservatives. It should be called libnews.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 12:52 AM
15

I had the same thing attempted when I was 10, but I told the teen-aged babysitter hell to the no, you’re not observing me shower. It caused a huge fight. I can’t even picture a 14 year old boy babysitter observing a 10 year old girl take a shower. Double standards abound.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 12:36 AM
1

How comical is it for a woman to get hit in the crotch? Answer: Not at all, it’s never made into comedy.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 04:53 PM
1

Snowflake because I needed surgery? Hmmm….interesting. May a house fall on your head.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:06 PM
4

It’s not funny. A neighborhood bully kicked me in the crotch and laughed as I puked my guts out. Later needed surgery. Really funny, right? Is it funny when a woman gets kicked in the crotch?! Why not?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:57 PM
5

Why isn’t it funny if a woman gets hit in the crotch?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:51 PM
13

Yep. Media make jokes about that when some crazy lady mutilates a man. https://youtu.be/80JqoyaL-p4
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:10 PM
1

Epididymis. Normal.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 05:28 AM
8

When men are young and no longer useful to their wife and kids, they are discarded. Money is our only commodity.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 12:31 PM
34

It’s subject to abuse. Note that there are no limits placed on the leave time. If women have this disability, maybe they should not be soldiers and astronauts and surgeons and ER doctors and paramedics and firefighters and….
/r/MensRights23/04/22 01:17 AM
57

The use of internal “investigations” and committees to make rulings on criminal matters violates American due process as understood by our court systems, since the accused is not allowed to face his accuser and cross examine her in a jury trial or trial before a judge.,
/r/MensRights22/04/22 11:18 AM
17

She used the young kid to get back at her husband and that mitigates the offense in the mind of the judge?! Hmmm….
/r/MensRights22/04/22 11:13 AM
1

The point is that the crazy lady gets paid millions of dollars by MSNBC to play her feminist nonsense games on TV, influencing other crazy feminists to be anti-male, anti-hard work. Men don’t get to bash women on TV, nor do they generally want to. Culture is a thing, and it moves in certain directions based on people and their ideas, including TV personalities. Self-defense is different from assault and battery. Men decrying phrases that are anti-male is very different from feminists actually be…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 11:20 AM
1

“Hard work” is not bashing anyone.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 10:36 AM
1

Double standards are the issue. See how that works? No, you don’t see anything…. Besides, “hard work” is not an anti-female or anti-male anything, it’s not anti anything except anti laziness. Male bashing is quite different. Feminists do it with impunity.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 10:27 AM
-2

Whoosh! My point was that the so-called “tolerant liberals”, especially pro abortion ones, are very intolerant people.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:16 PM
5

Your fellow travelers in abortion rights are intolerant fake tolerant people. Just sayin.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 12:49 PM
8

Nonsense, nothing comes close to fds.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:55 PM
6

Know thy enemy.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 05:09 PM
1

Is it their prerogative? Should it be? Can google ban Reddit? Then what? We all start banning each other!
/r/MensRights19/04/22 01:57 PM
4

Power goes to people’s heads. YouTube and Twitter are insufferable.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:00 PM
10

All feminist sites ban speech that they disagree with. Here, I’ve been flamed by angry anti-circumcision people, but not banned, yet….. If people want an echo chamber, why not shout to themselves in their own bedrooms?! I come to social media to discuss and learn and exchange ideas! Imagine that! I have strong opinions and will give them, but I never flag a post that disagrees with me or calls me names, because I’d rather have robust discussion than censorship.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 10:47 AM
42

Reddit should be a free speech zone. Instead it’s a GroupThink Zone, with a few exceptional sites. I refuse to visit a subreddit that bans dissenting opinions. If they kicked you out, be glad!
/r/MensRights19/04/22 10:15 AM
0

IDC how feminists see me, I’m married. IDC how my wife sees me, I’m a man and I’m going to be head of my household (properly understood, as both leader and servant) come hell or high water. It hasn’t happened in 35 years of marriage😂, but by damn it’s going to happen before I die, if she doesn’t divorce me first.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 09:33 AM
3

We thank you!
/r/MensRights19/04/22 01:13 AM
1

What if life were rainbows and unicorns? Sorry to be cynical, but men are just screwed until normal women take up the cause, and that’s not going to happen any time soon.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:40 AM
15

It was sexual assault and you should report it and tell your mom. If your mom doesn’t support you, you need to get your independence as soon as possible . It doesn’t matter if anybody does anything about it, the report will be on file and that crazy pervert will have that to deal with for a long time.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 02:04 PM
1

In America, Democrats not only allow, but they celebrate very bold and brazen shoplifting by certain categories of people.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 01:56 AM
4

So when does the right to walk around naked become the next frontier of crazy leftists?! It starts in 3,2,1…..
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:04 PM
2

Abortion is always wrong. Men should make sure woman is on BCP or the man should wear condom. A pill is easy to take, what is going on with irresponsible people?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:51 PM
11

I’m not sure what you posted, but censorship on Reddit sucks. I hate it and ML should not be doing that nonsense.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:48 PM
1

Amen!
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:32 AM
1

Micro penis is treated with testosterone. Look it up online it’s easy to do.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 05:14 AM
5

Female sites are toxic. Yet on and on they go….
/r/MensRights12/04/22 12:41 AM
1

Micro penis is treated with testosterone to enlarge the penis. AIS has several variants, and is identified by comparison to the normal circumstance. That’s how it’s identified, by comparison to NORMAL. Using your logic, diabetes is not a disease and we should just let people have the condition without treatment. AIS patients are treated according to their phenotypic approximation of NORMAL. That makes sense. You don’t make sense.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 04:35 AM
1

Ok, stop the nonsense. There are normal variants that are not defined as “intersex”. A small penis or a shallow vagina, up to a point, are not even classified as abnormal or intersex. There are limits however. A micro penis owner wants a “normal” penis, so urologists created a functional size number cutoff and decided that a patient (yes, a medical Patient) gets treatment if his penis is below a certain threshold of size. Sheesh, you’re intentionally being dense. A mildly enlarged clitoris does …
/r/MensRights11/04/22 03:01 AM
1

Intersex is not transgender. Intersex has functional defects almost always. Good grief.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 02:53 AM
1

Functionality is affected by being abnormal. That’s a medical fact. You need to stick with non medical issues please and leave biological reality to doctors, thanks. Hyposadias? Bifid vagina? Absence of vagina?! Urethral agenesis?! Clitoromegaly?! Micro penis? Absence of vas deferens?! All of those things happen and are ABNORMAL. All persons affected want help (as they get older, they will be pissed off that they were not fixed in youth). All of them. Goodbye stranger, it’s been nice, but not ve…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 02:44 AM
1

Doctors have to fix the abnormal genitalia. A choice had to be made. How can a choice be made without deciding that they’re abnormal? That’s not making any sense.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 02:18 AM
1

I never spoke against equal rights or respect. I refuse to read your post after that sentence. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:53 AM
1

False. There are normal male and normal female genitalia and sex, and abnormal genitalia. Normative is a thing. Ask any person if they would want intersex genitalia and they would say no. It’s a deviation from the norm. The deviation from the norm is true by statistical mathematics, which don’t lie.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:44 AM
1

Intersex is abnormal genitalia, I agree about that. It is not “abnormal person” is my point. And, the intersex medical conditions are determinable based on the norm of genitalia, aren’t they?! So, there is male and female.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:16 PM
1

I never said normal or abnormal. Standard xx or xy with normal genitalia and no intersex condition is boy or girl, male or female. Intersex is intersex, transgender is transgender. “Normal” is a word that you used.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 10:21 PM
1

That makes no sense. Female is sex. Woman is sex. Gender fluid is “transgender”. Use the word “trans male” or “trans female” for any deviation from sex. Very simple to understand.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 10:07 PM
2

I merely stated that referring to a woman as a female is legitimate and makes sense, just as referring to a man as male makes sense.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 09:25 PM
20

Female dating strategies uses the word. And they dehumanize men by calling low quality men “scrotes”. What a bunch of see you next Tuesday females.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:57 AM
118

I was kicked off badwomensanatomy for defending the word “female”.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:55 AM
0

Your obsession with trailer parks is an interesting quirk. I’d say you’re a bit of a class envy kind of guy, and a supercilious fraud and faker. You insult because that’s your only argument. I’m embarrassed for you. (I live in a very comfortable home in a gated community. Does that change anything about this discussion?!).
/r/MensRights10/04/22 02:14 AM
0

I have you a science review article of the subject. It’s your fault that you don’t understand the article.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 02:04 AM
0

My son in the sixth grade is not allowed to use Wikipedia as a source. You’re a joke.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 12:52 AM
1

Lol. You’re a cipher.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 12:51 AM
0

Wikipedia versus Science Direct? Lol. Scientists use sentience as I do, and sapient to mean “wise”. Good grief what nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:31 PM
0

From Science Direct: “Sentience refers to the depth of awareness an individual possesses about himself or herself and others. There appear to be three related, but separable, general domains of sentience. These are self-awareness, metacognition, and theory of mind.” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080453378000991 Thanks for playing, bye! And stop calling people names, especially when you are so easily proved to be wrong.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 06:05 AM
0

Do you even know the definition of “sentience”? You’re embarrassing yourself.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 04:11 AM
0

Sentience has nothing to do with ontological essence as a human being who deserves legal protection. Babies are not sentient for quite some time after being born. So what’s your point? Shall we kill newborns because they lack sentience?
/r/MensRights09/04/22 03:50 AM
1

I disagree with your post, and the general sense of your post. I disagree with ppl in here all the time about male infant circumcision, for example, and although I’ve had some very negative reactions, even “mean-spirited ones”, I never got cancelled or kicked off. If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Spirited debate never bothered me, what bothers me is being kicked off a subreddit just because you don’t go along with the prevailing opinions. And guess who usually does the kicki…
/r/MensRights09/04/22 03:25 AM
1

What are you even talking about?! You’re the one who wants to kill babies in utero.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 03:18 AM
0

Newborn babies are not sentient, and you’re not sapient.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 03:09 AM
7

Nonsense. Two Feminist sites kicked me off for disagreeing about the accepted narrative. This site tolerates dissent.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:49 PM
-1

Hypocrisy?! Humans are ontologically distinct from animals. If that simple fact escapes you, you can’t be helped.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:38 PM
-1

I’m eating a big ol steak for lunch just for you. Yummy!
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:34 PM
0

Are you saying that you would protect a fetus once the nervous system can experience pain? You put a cow above a 4 month old fetus, above a 9 month fully developed fetus. Bizarro.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:40 AM
0

So do fetuses feel pain. Pain receptors do not change the ontological essence of a creature. A zygote is a human, a 6 month fetus is a human, You put cows ahead of fetuses, you’re deranged.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:41 PM
0

A newborn baby has no self-awareness. Arguing with you is like arguing with a child. Bye.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:27 PM
0

Goodbye. You aren’t worth talking to at all.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:13 PM
16

Welfare policies for unwed mothers, women’s only hospitals, disproportionate research dollars for breast cancer research, divorce laws, laws on custody of children after divorce, registering for draft for war, rules for women being on boards of businesses, set asides for women for small business grants.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:19 PM
0

Lol, I knew you had no answers. Atheists never do.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:12 PM
5

Stages of development like “fetus” vs embryo vs baby are just arbitrary designations. They don’t define the ontological essence of the conceptus from zygote forward, to wit: a human being.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:09 PM
0

Biologically and immunologically and genetically, the fetus is a separate and distinct organism from the mother. It is a human being. Your inability to see that does not speak well for your knowledge base. When does a fetus become human, and what biological event marks that transition to “humanity”, and why do humans deserve protection different from animals if we have no souls?! Chimps gotta chimp…..
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:00 PM
1

Are you sentient? Sapient? I eat meat. The ontological essence of a zygote/embryo/fetus is a HUMAN BEING. The ontological essence of an animal is animal, it has no spiritual significance as a child of God. Either you believe that man has a soul or you don’t. If not, then murder is ok. If so, then fetuses deserve protection.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:33 PM
1

Ontological essence.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:11 PM
1

There’s almost never a need for abortion to save the mother. I can’t think of a single circumstance, maybe a young mother with pulmonary hypertension in early pregnancy.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:31 PM
2

You meant “women” somewhere.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:17 PM
1

A term newborn doesn’t have that level of awareness of self for crying out loud. Good grief, your idea would make it ok to kill babies after full term birth. Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:13 PM
1

False. A mother whose life is in danger is always allowed, even by the Catholic Church, to deliver the baby prematurely. There is almost never a need to abort the baby. If there were, it would be morally licit. Such conditions are almost unheard of.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:12 PM
0

So would you abort a nine month of pregnancy developed fetus?! Have you seen the photos of such abortions?! It’s disgusting.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:01 PM
1

When does a fetus become worthy of protection in your diminished mind?! Would it be after exiting the introitus at 9 months? What about a born preemie at 25 weeks?! Would it be a 8 month old fetus after its head exits the cervix but before its head exits the introitus? Would it be after its feet have exited the introitus? What are your criteria for conferring “personhood” onto a human creature?!
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:59 PM
0

The ontological essence of a zygote is a human being. Same for embryo, same for fetus, same for a preemie, same for a newborn, same for a person born without arms, same for person in a coma. There is constant change in our morphologies from one stage to the next. Independence of existence from nutrition sources is not the basis of one’s humanity.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:42 PM
0

Yes. Ontology is unrelated to dependency.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:30 PM
2

I know exactly what it means. A newborn baby requires a mother’s milk, or equivalent. Is that bodily autonomy?! It needs food and shelter. A person on dialysis or a ventilator is not autonomous; you aren’t, I am not, we are not off the grid. We depend on farmers and lots of people to keep us alive. So what level of autonomy confers humanity on a person, hmmm?!
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:27 PM
1

Taken as directed, 99.9% effective. Routine Abortion is driven by irresponsible behavior.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:05 PM
0

Irresponsibility leads to pregnancy. Don’t be irresponsible. A newborn baby can’t live on its own. You can’t and I can’t.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:04 PM
0

Really? Can a newborn live autonomously? Can you lol? Nope and nope.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:02 PM
5

Look at the babies’ bodies from the DC abortions and tell me that they were granted bodily autonomy. A fetus is ontologically, biologically, immunologically, and genetically distinct from the mother. It is not “her body”. Why can’t irresponsible women take a stupid pill everyday?! Hmmm?!
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:52 AM
2

I have a case of petromasculinity and I love the internal combustion engine. They burn clean as a whistle these days. They save lithium which is going to be in short supply sooner than oil will be. Then what? We need to go nuclear.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 11:17 PM
3

Read what you actually wrote and stop arguing with yourself. Your penultimate sentence belies your current take.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:09 AM
2

This sub is nothing like feminist hate sites, sorry. Your take is just wrong.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:40 PM
3

This sub allows diversity of opinion. Imagine that….
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:38 PM
1

This comment got flagged for hate speech. FYI, intersex is not transexuality and it’s not Hate Speech Reddit! Ef off.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:52 PM
2

Good analogy, I agree, thanks.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:49 PM
3

Socialism sucks. Capitalism is nothing more than a system of exchange wherein two parties, buyer and seller, reach an agreed strike price in a free exchange. Employer and employee similarly reach an agreed wage level. Socialism seeks to disrupt that free exchange in a form of forcible willpower from outside parties who don’t have a vested interest in the transactions. No thanks.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:29 AM
6

I haven’t seen the vitriol here that you seem to equate to feminist sites.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:01 AM
16

Just go to female dating strategies or badwomensanatomy or other feminist sites if you want to see real hatred. This place is tame by comparison.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:42 AM
5

You must know a select population of women if “almost all of them” were sexually abused. Studies that show a high rate of female rape are based on surveys where (voluntarily) sexually active women are asked if they ever had sex “when they didn’t really want to” or similar questions that don’t include forcible rape. Heck, most men have had sex with a female partner when they didn’t really feel like it…..
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:25 AM
35

Prisoners often get ignored. Part of the problem Is that many prisoners fake their symptoms and illnesses to get a day out of prison by going to the doctor or hospital. It’s the “boy who cried wolf” problem. It’s sad, but prison guards are generally not very sympathetic to prisoners, and can’t be expected to stratify fakers from really sick people.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:12 AM
4

Ugly men who make fun of women’s looks is a thing, I agree, and it always strikes me as plainly ridiculous. Of course nobody should be made fun of for things outside of their control, and not even for many things that they somewhat control!
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:43 PM
129

You answered your own question: double standards.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 09:36 PM
7

He’s saying that feminists created the trans sport problem by insisting on equality. Women can compete in men’s sports [vandy kicker two years ago] and wrestle against boys etc., they took away Boy Scouts and men’s golf courses, they want equal pay for tennis and soccer and basketball etc even though the disparity is huge….. Female sports reporters barge into male locker rooms by law! Yet they pretend they’re afraid of naked men? What don’t you get about all of that?
/r/MensRights28/03/22 04:50 PM
8

Women want double standards. No thanks. You ignored the OP points.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:32 PM
3

Will Smith looked like a total idiot.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:26 PM
3

Weirdos
/r/MensRights28/03/22 08:29 AM
23

Will Smith has privilege. He’s missing the privilege of having a faithful wife. He’s pathetic.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 08:24 AM
-5

Forced-birther? Interesting word. Nobody forces 99.9% of abortion seekers to get pregnant. Bodily autonomy?! How about swallowing a daily pill to have the sexual bodily autonomy that you desire. Is that asking too much of you?
/r/MensRights25/03/22 03:43 PM
27

Time to own the damn company yourself. Otherwise you will get cancelled.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:17 PM
1

Agree! Anybody who raised kids knows that girls and boys are generally different. Generally. Boys are generally rambunctious and interested in “stuff” like motorcycles, even as early as one and a half years old. Girls are generally more sedate and interested in dolls, even as early as one and a half years old. My woke daughter discovered this herself with her son and a neighbor girl, both almost the exact same age. My kids were all very sex-based biased on their interests and behavior. And no, n…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:11 PM
7

Pro-life means that he doesn’t deserve an opinion? Interesting. You’re here because somebody was pro-life and created you.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:45 AM
54

She’s despicable. She deserves more jail time. Jussie Smollett and other fake hate crime losers deserve lots of jail time too.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:39 AM
8

Don’t take on debt that you don’t want. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:37 PM
1

Interesting, thanks.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 12:18 PM
24

No mechanism given. Yawn.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:46 AM
10

Feminism is the worst “rights movement” ever.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 08:46 AM
-11

The anti circumcision crowd is emotional and irrational. You’re fine.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 08:44 AM
1

Pol pot. 6 million dead. Hitler was an atheist/pagan nonsense phenomenon. Evolution theory tied into his master race ideas. Christianity built modern scientific Revolution industries society, and more hospitals and schools than any other ideological phenomenon. There are books on the case for Christianity as a force for good in the world. You can celebrate Mao and Stalin and Castro and pol pot and other murderous atheists all you want to, facts are on the side of Christianity. The rare outlier e…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:23 AM
1

Typos fixed.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:18 AM
2

Fail from the start. The crusades were a defensive war by Christians against invader and marauding Muslims. I’m not here to defend Islam. Now look up how many millions were murdered by atheist regimes: atheist Russia and China alone account for over 200 million.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 02:25 AM
0

Let’s do! Which religion? Pagan ones? Don’t forget them. The Roman Empire was very religious lol. So were the Aztecs and Maya and Irish Druids and….
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:52 PM
11

Amen! I remember when Dan Rather pulled that nonsense when he was making millions as an anchor. He never gave up HIS spot! Popovich basketball coach is the same BS virtue signaling idiot, most of them are, because they know the a White male is on the crosshairs of being replaced based on identity politics.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 11:24 AM
1

Yeah, human sacrifice and cannibalism were so peachy keen!
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:22 AM
0

It’s bizarre. No male should ever do any such thing with any students either, it’s also bizarre. The level of disorder to do something so risky is insane. Gotta be some addiction issues.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:40 AM
2

Your should know the data if you’re defending hormonal and/or surgical sex changes in children. Johns Hopkins abandoned it for years after the John Money disaster.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 11:24 AM
2

Really. Explain then why suicide rates are so high in people who go through medical and surgical transition!!? It’s dangerous to give hormonal treatments to young kids before their brains are fully myelinated.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:54 AM
1

She is onto something important, but you’re misinterpreting it as though it’s a complete dichotomy with no overlap. There is overlap, but the premise is correct. Men want respect from a woman, not boot licking or blind respect, but basic respect as an effective man. If that’s not how you feel, it’s because we are talking about generalities.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:48 AM
1

Yeah, popcorn is about all we can do at this point. It’s bad.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 01:58 PM
4

Sadly true.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 10:38 AM
-9

Lack of chivalry is the fault of feminists who have demanded fake equality and emasculated men. I prefer the old way: I will help protect a woman in need, just as I would do for a man. This toxic mgtow is poison to our culture. If men won’t defend civilization, who will?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 10:17 AM
6

No man would be stupid enough to make such a bold claim unless he was a trained and experienced boxer/fighter. Women are so ridiculous with the Girl Power narrative.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:14 PM
10

I’m not mgtow by any means, but why shouldn’t men have such a site when the women have hate speech sites like “female dating strategy”?!
/r/MensRights14/03/22 10:19 PM
8

There are lots of “last acceptable prejudices”, but yes, it’s acceptable now to hate on men.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:52 AM
2

Don’t play the role of a jester, be yourself. Nobody invented or created himself, we are all creatures. I am a creature, same as you. If I have any good physical qualities, I didn’t do that. If I have bad ones, I didn’t do that either. It’s your brain and your soul that you control. Master them and you control the world, because all we have and know in this world, in the final analysis, is our own consciousness, and that only temporarily.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:12 AM
3

Wait. I insulted the woke LEFT. If you are not woke Left, then it’s quite cool because it’s not you. The woke left are execrable, I will never not insult those officious authoritarian bullies.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 11:07 AM
11

Breast cancer has gobbled up more research money than several cancers combined. There’s no good excuse.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:26 AM
4

Most sites are run by libtards.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:24 AM
10

Run as fast as you can.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:17 AM
5

That place is sickening. It’s poison for the brain.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 01:07 PM
1

How is her statement against men? The obverse of her statement is that if women exist as women, and are different from men, then men exist separately and apart from women. As such, we deserve equal treatment. What am I missing?
/r/MensRights10/03/22 12:49 PM
12

Agreed. It would be a terrible site if we all agreed about everything. I can’t stand officious moderators who kick people off sites for violating GroupThink.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 10:36 AM
-1

Not I.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 02:37 AM
3

Any sociological study can show anything that the authors want it to show. Science is a very poor tool for analyzing socio-cultural phenomena. I’ve seen conflicting studies on marriage and family all the time, because statistics can be distorted in any direction, and the yardsticks used to measure outcomes are totally subjectively chosen.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:06 AM
2

Freak.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 10:31 PM
5

Women worked hard to have special privileges.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 07:20 AM
1

Ova are more than a “shell” lol. They carry equal amount of dna that sperm carry. Almost all of the mitochondria are from the ovum.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:56 AM
2

She’s a freak.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:45 AM
-8

Fair enough post. Nobody should be genitalia shamed, and the double standards are obvious. It seems that women have a lot of control over circumcision decisions for their babies, while men are told that we cannot say or do anything related to female bodies. Stating preferences in male genitalia is done all the time by women in movies and comedy clubs and social media, but men would get hammered for doing that. There are male nurses who are shut out of “labor and delivery” suites due to toxic fem…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:40 AM
2

Boring. My biography would suck and I’m a man. The fact is that very few people have interesting biographies, and most happen to be men. I’m all for women being the subject of interesting biographies. “Joan of Arc” by Mark Twain is an awesome book (and his favorite that he wrote by the way).
/r/MensRights05/03/22 10:49 PM
4

Just be yourself. It sounds like you have a good head on your shoulders. It is true that men generally have some characteristics that are different from women and vice-versa. There are good books about that sort of thing, and I would certainly read one or two just to get an idea about the male-female differences. But all people are individuals, so not all generalizations apply to each. Either way, it’s a good to be sensitive to your partner’s particularities. Communication! My wife and I benefit…
/r/MensRights05/03/22 11:19 AM
1

There would be no evil or suffering if Man had not sinned, that’s the point of the story. It’s maybe an allegory.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 08:26 PM
1

There would be no morality, and hence no suffering, in paradise. To “know” good vs evil is to experience suffering, because Paradise only has the “good”. It’s not “knowledge” per se, but rather it’s the experience of suffering. It’s to “know” or experience good vs evil, better defined as suffering.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 10:38 AM
-9

False. A Cochrane review is an expert, peer-reviewed, literature based, medical doctor information site that tries to objectively examine controversies in Medicine and determine if prospective controlled studies favor a particular position. It’s not perfect, but it’s as good as it gets. The problem with Medical care is that there are often unresolved controversies because great studies don’t always exist. When they do exist, activists sometimes deny the study results.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 05:00 PM
2

Gender studies is a wasteland of leftist feminist propaganda and totally non academic as a field of “study”. It’s the lowest of the low.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:48 PM
0

Knowledge of good vs evil. Big difference. It means that in disobeying God’s law, we would not live in paradise but rather come to know “good versus evil” (suffering) in daily life. Atheism makes no sense. I tried it but my brain hurt because the universe did not arise de novo from nothing. What is nothing?! No idea.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:42 PM
1

Great post and so true.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:37 PM
-17

Cochrane review. The gold standard.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:00 PM
-21

I’m glad that I am circumcised. This Cochrane review of adult circumcision shows no side effects of the procedure in adults. A Cochrane review is as good as it gets in medical studies: Authors' conclusions “There is strong evidence that medical male circumcision reduces the acquisition of HIV by heterosexual men by between 38% and 66% over 24 months. Incidence of adverse events is very low, indicating that male circumcision, when conducted under these conditions, is a safe procedure. Inclusion o…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 10:09 AM
-2

Since children are dependents, somebody has to own them. I own the responsibility and rights to care for them, educate them, feed them, house them, love them. I will do that how I deem fit, and I am quite certain that they are better off with me as their caretaker than they would be with you.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:56 PM
-5

That’s because studies prove that neonatal circumcision is not mutilating at all, but you don’t like true science.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:39 PM
0

Female “circumcision” is not the same. A clitoris really has not foreskin; homologous tissues are quite different between the two organs. You can’t remove part of the clitoris without affecting its functioning. A foreskin is just nuisance excess tissue, as demonstrated in numerous studies on adults circumcised as adults. You need to take a chill pill 💊.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:37 PM
-1

Calm down. Millions of men have been circumcised over centuries and they are/were all just fine. You have gotten yourself all upset over nothing. The ability of the human mind to go bananas never ceases to amaze me.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:35 PM
-1

Female genital mutilation is not the same. A clitoris is not a small penis, although the tissues from which it arises are homologous.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:15 PM
0

I’m not your pal.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:13 PM
0

Yes, parents do own their children. Who else does, the State?! Of course that ownership has responsibilities, and in that sense I agree that parents do not have carte blanche to do whatever they want to their children. Society has an interest in protecting children. But I disagree that circumcision is one of those things that society should proscribe. (If I don’t own my children, then please send me checks to feed and house and educate them. Also, my kids like the finer things in life, so make t…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:02 PM
-1

Parents make choices for their kids’ bodies all the time. They choose their food, diapers, vaccinations, medications, antibiotics, and even surgery. So your entire premise is false.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 08:58 PM
-1

Try writing complete sentences. The stupid stopping and putting periods thing and capitalizing makes you look ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 08:56 PM
-2

No, I am not. I support the right of parents to decide whether to circumcise their neonates.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 05:09 PM
-1

Adult circumcision has been studied quite extensively and studies show no difference. But you gotta have an axe to grind, so go playing the victim (like all the feminists do) all you want to. The fact is that circumcised men are fine, they are not unhappy, and the best you could come up with is to tell them that they would be “even happier” with sex if they were “intact”. Whatever.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 04:07 PM
-5

Fuck “off”. How does one do that? If circumcision were really a terrible thing then adults would never do it. But they do and they are happy.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:40 PM
-10

Every citation I ever listed here that proves that neonatal circumcision in America has possible but very modest benefits and no negative effects has been attacked by the intactivists as garbage. Also, the adult circumcision studies that show the same are attacked here. Plenty of proof exists that adults don’t lose function or pleasure post circumcision. There are some conflicting studies. I read them. I don’t believe activist studies, sorry. The best evidence is that it’s fine to do it, but not…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:23 PM
-45

Nope. I’m not going there with you. Circumcised men are quite happy and functional and there is no evidence of dysfunction. All the silly article citations that you will post that say otherwise are from biased intactivist “researchers”. Give it a rest. Sex change is mutilation plain and simple.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 02:47 AM
26

Public ridicule of men as buffoons, body shaming of men in movies and standup comedy and political discourse is routine. Why is this ok? 🤏
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:40 PM
140

Google sucks.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:29 PM
1

Maybe so, but liberals have ceded a lot of ground to the socialists.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:21 PM
1

Democrats wouldn’t have any power without women. If you don’t see just how bad our cities are and just how controlled by Democrats they are, then I assume that you’re not an American.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:16 PM
1

All you have done is insult since your first post. You never made any rational point at all, I responded in kind. Liberals are so insane.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:03 PM
1

You are so erudite! Your posts are so clever and incisive that I’m really going to take a good hard look at your analysis and rethink my position. Did that community college degree help you in life? I might have to go get one asap!
/r/MensRights23/02/22 06:26 PM
1

We can’t stop Russia or China from doing anything that they want to at this point. So yeah, reading about the fall of the Roman Empire just might make for a subject worth studying.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 06:10 PM
1

One word for you: Ukraine.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 05:49 PM
2

Our country is going to crap.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 10:39 PM
1

Ah, but including fake diseases like chronic fatigue skews the fake research in a fake manner. The game was given away in the first couple paragraphs. You could just as easily include suicides into the numbers and deaths on the job and in war and call the lack of research into those health issues “Men’s Issues” and prove that medical research ignores men. It’s a joke what that article claimed. Breast cancer got all the $$$$$ because “WOMEN”! Women were not enrolled in some studies for lots of re…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 03:26 PM
1

False. The article should not start with editorializing about how women have been oppressed. It’s ridiculous.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 11:55 AM
5

Good point about matriarchal society variants, fair enough. I would extend the idea that western feminism has done great damage to the entire western world. Most of Europe is declining to oblivion. As for the rest, I don’t know what to tell you other than Democrat-controlled cities are trash heaps of horrible.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 09:33 AM
1

No, I meant urologist. Urologists treat all those conditions that the OP claimed had no doctors available to treat. I posted in at least two locations that urologists also treat women. That’s because women have urinary tracts that get diseased in ways that only urologists generally treat. A gynecologist will often treat a lower UTI, for example, but not so much a true kidney infection or a kidney stone, or remove a diseased kidney or repair a severed ureter for example. But you have to understan…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:45 AM
1

Yes I know, thanks.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:38 AM
1

Any science article that starts out with an assumption and opinion about what it is looking for (assuming the outcome in the premise) can’t be trusted .
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:40 PM
2

I’m reviewing, but this looks very tendentious and ridiculous: From your citation: “An issue commonly faced by women is having their physical complaints trivialized or misdiagnosed as psychologically based. As noted by Tasca et al.,10 the concept of hysteria as a mental disorder attributable to women goes back 4,000 years and was commonly used to misdiagnose females until the turn of the 20th century; it took until 1980 for hysterical neurosis to be deleted from the Diagnostic and Statistical Ma…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:16 PM
4

Turf battles exist between the two specialties to a small degree, especially for sub sub-specialists, but Ob-gyns don’t deal with the upper urinary tract much at all, and urologists tend to stay away from most gynecology and certainly OB. What tends to happen in urology groups is that the female patients all want to see the female urologist in the group, so they kind of get pigeonholed that way. Some are happy to have that happen. Males are being squeezed out of OB-gyn care and female urology ca…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 04:06 PM
3

Yes I made that point in a later post. Roughly 30% of their patients are female.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:52 PM
2

Breast cancer got all the big dollars and research. Prostate is lately catching up. Your point is excellent, thanks for posting. It’s exhausting arguing with know-nothings who think that they are smart.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:47 PM
3

You are not more informed than I am. I won’t even tell you my background lol. Good grief.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:34 PM
4

Stop. Do you agree that breast cancer received way more funding? Just say at least “yes” to that. It could be that some of the disparity made sense, given that younger women than tend to get breast cancer than men get prostate cancer. However, there is large overlap. Also, many many men die of prostate cancer and not from other stuff. Also, many women die WITH breast cancer and not from it. They are similar in that many women who are treated might not have needed treatment, we just don’t know wh…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:33 PM
3

Michael Milken was the first rich guy to donate a bunch to prostate cancer research, later a guy name Robert F. Smith and then a Koch brother also did the same. It was to make up for the disparity that the government and NIH created between Breast cancer and prostate cancer research. I went to NFL football games where pink ribbons were all over the place for breast cancer awareness and money raising. It’s fine and good, nobody wants women to die of breast cancer, but there WAS a huge disparity. …
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:04 PM
3

Wait, you want ME to prove to YOU that breast cancer research in the 80s, 90s, and early 2000s (and maybe even now) had way more research money spent on it?! Lady, do your own darned google searches. You will deny whatever I post anyway. It’s a fact.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:56 PM
1

At one point, breast cancer was gobbling up all the cancer dollars for research. Prostate was way behind. A billionaire kicked in a bunch of money to close the gap, I’ll think of his name in a minute lol. It’s probably still true. You could argue that younger women were/are getting breast cancer compared to men getting prostate, but it’s thin gruel from a man’s pov to hear that argument., yes?! No?!
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:49 PM
8

Lol! Well you never know! Ignorance can be forgiven, I certainly have made my share of gaffes. He must be young. Urologists of course more exclusively do renal disease and stones etc, while gynecologists generally do not, but both specialties can overlap on pelvic floor surgery, reconstructive female surgery, treating UTIs etc.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:38 PM
6

Of course, women have plumbing issues too, but gynecologists and urologists overlap in treating women. 30% of a urologist’s practice is women, generally speaking. Female urologists dominate that specialty in attracting female patients, just as gynecology has become dominated by women MDs.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:05 PM
32

Urologists.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 11:51 AM
11

Lol. No, I’m married with children. Wife has degree. Daughters have college degrees, and advanced degrees. I’m all for women pursuing whatever they want to. It’s just that they don’t want to work as hard as men in their careers. (Not always true, there are as overlapping bell curves). But women have been sold a bill of goods. In the end, family is more important than career. Many women find that out only after they have their first baby at age 30 these days.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 12:51 PM
13

Women have been attacking masculinity since day 1. It’s just that they have the power to actually do it now. Can anybody really make the case that this matriarchal society is better than what preceded it?! We are collapsing morally and economically. Look at our cities: tent city wastelands created by liberal socialists, most of whom achieved power through women’s votes. The liberal DAs who let crime run rampant are feminist ideologue lunatics, or put in place by feminist leaning voters.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:59 AM
1

Digest this: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664618304376
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:03 AM
1

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41367-019-0011-7
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:01 AM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333005/
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:00 AM
1

Wait. I would concede all of that. Obese person do eat a lot. Their hunger centers are driven by hunger. Imagine a thirst center that made you thirsty all day. Studies show that obese persons absorb more calories consumed. https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.14107
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:57 AM
16

Tendentious books? About women’s oppression? I had a 30 year career and I saw what I saw. I know what I know currently. Who gets more college degrees these days? But who is most productive these days? Who does the actual work? Women get advanced degrees and have very short careers and short hours on the job. Female doctors have on average much shorter careers and see fewer patients year in and year out. They take more time off. That is a fact.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:53 AM
28

All i see is marginalization of men and favoritism of women since I was young. That excuse won’t work any more. Women, on average, work less hard. Period. Fact. I lived that my entire career. Many women are better than many men, but it’s the averages that we are looking at. The bell curves overlap. No more excuses. Women are heavily favored by society and that goes back a long time.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:32 AM
0

At this point I’m ok with that. No murder should go unsolved. Don’t tape or kill anybody and you have nothing to hide. Can it be abused? Anything can be abused.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 06:03 PM
5

She’s there for eye candy. Period.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 12:23 PM
1

Heck, many murders are never solved in poor and democrat controlled cities. Democrats don’t care about the poor. East Saint Louis MO didn’t solve 80 murders in a row. This went on for a long time.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 11:54 AM
0

DNA registries exist. Police use them to catch male perps all the time. Females should be no exception. DNA is collected for all kinds of reasons, including for registering to own a concealed firearm, and you betcha the police will comb those data sets for all kinds of crimes committed, even without use of a gun. A male rapist will have his dna used against him in future crimes after he is released from prison. Why would females be excluded? If my dna is collected as a victim of a battery, so as…
/r/MensRights18/02/22 11:53 AM
1

Give it a rest. I’m talking about Muslim Third World Sharia Law culture. Do your own research. Thanks.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 09:23 AM
1

In many places they do. Are you saying otherwise? Have you seen women who are wrapped head to toe in burqas? And who are subjugated by Islam by Sharia law?! Beheadings based on the testimony of one man? Married off at a young age, unwillingly? FGM?! No rights compared to men? Come on guy. Be somewhat fair if you can force yourself to do that.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 08:09 AM
1

Do tell us all about the life-threatening misogyny that exists in western societies. Please do. Maybe focus on the Third World where women really are oppressed. Oh yeah, nobody cares about that do they? They just want to destroy the nuclear western family and whine whine whine about nothing.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 07:41 AM
11

Lawsuit city. Payout should be millions of dollars.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 07:38 AM
2

Do more research on obesity. Metabolism is determined by the microbiome and not so much by “willpower”. I am not obese at all, so I’m not claiming anything about myself as a defense. Obesity is very complex, and it is NOT a moral failing most of the time. The science on this is very solid. The gut microbiome determines the caloric absorption of consumed calories. Bariatric surgery works not by decreasing stomach volume per se, but through an epiphenomenon which results in an altered microbiome, …
/r/MensRights18/02/22 07:36 AM
35

The double standard is obvious.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 03:40 AM
6

You chip on your shoulder is a mile wide and a mile deep. It must be heavy.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:30 PM
11

Please tell me this is sarcasm. Sometimes I don’t see the obvious. Right?! Sarcasm?
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:38 AM
2

Um, first of all, what is aborted is not usually just “clumps of cells”. Most abortions involve fetuses with arms and legs and a heartbeat. In many states, abortion is legal up to term delivery. It happens with some frequency in the third trimester! It is almost NEVER done on clumps of cells. Good grief at least learn some embryology and facts about abortion. Second point is that, ontologically speaking, even adults are “just” a collection of cells. What does that collection of cells represent? …
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:35 AM
2

Hate? Yeah, because it’s loving to abort babies…..got it.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 09:58 AM
1

“You’re”. It’s a contraction of “you are”.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 10:15 PM
1

Oh forget it. If you’re pro-abortion we are done here.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 08:05 PM
1

Nonsense. When a girl is on her third abortion or has five welfare Queen kiddos, there’s obviously some serious irresponsibility issues in play. Dang it’s insane how many excuses our society makes for bad behavior. We’ve had quite enough.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 07:46 PM
1

BCPs taken as directed (swallow pill every day, not hard to do) are 99.8% effective. Single moms who pop out kids to get welfare are nasty people, that’s what I said.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 06:08 PM
1

BCPs. It’s pretty simple. And you didn’t address my comments at all.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 01:27 PM
2

Complex things don’t lend themselves to snippets on a platform. The types of single moms who get repeatedly pregnant with irresponsible single men, often multiple different men, and collect welfare, are the type that get criticized. Nobody criticizes a mother whose husband dies in a car wreck, now do they? Nor do they heavily criticize a young woman who made one “mistake”. But come on, there are limits to bad behavior. Can we please address bad behavior?! Is it THAT hard to take a pill every day…
/r/MensRights11/02/22 01:22 PM
5

Feminism and liberals go together like copper and electricity.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 12:53 PM
0

It’s an American OP twatwaddle.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 12:23 PM
0

Yeah, you did: “ask a woman”. What is your point twatwaddle? If you spike real English maybe we could actually understand your point. My point is the double standard that allows women, by federal law, to have tubes tied without permission of spouse.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:20 AM
0

There is a double standard in America if men are being asked to have permission to get snipped, because women do not need that in America, by federal law. I am agreeing with the OP. Wth?!
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:18 AM
0

You do know that I’m agreeing with the OP by pointing out the double standards? Or are you just slow?
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:17 AM
0

I’m agreeing with the OP, it seems that you’re too daft to see that.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:16 AM
1

Federal law is federal law. It was my statement that was invalidated first Einstein.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 08:14 PM
-14

In many states in America, it is explicitly written into law that women can have their tubes tied without permission from any partner. So stfu you twatwaddle. There is federal law also protects women from permission requirements.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:38 PM
-8

Um, no. My wife had her tubes tied without any medical person of any kind asking me anything. So go suck raw eggs smarty pants.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:33 PM
-36

Do women need permission for tubes tied or IUD or pills?! Nope!
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:51 PM
-39

Do women need permission for tubes tied or IUD or pills?! Nope!
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:50 PM
3

That study is nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 06:55 PM
2

Boy Scouts were ruined. End of discussion.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 06:54 PM
0

Popularity is not of interest to me. I do like the truth though. If you’re not a socialist, what’s your beef with my posts?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 03:28 PM
0

No, I sold my practice in 2017 to a private equity firm. I know medical economics, you know how to be a good little Socialist.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:25 AM
55

Men should stage a go on strike week and see just how badly the country burns. Of course, the woketards will say that it proves that men stole all the hard jobs from the Wymyn lol.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 10:55 AM
1

No, I have simply cited studies that show either no loss of function or pleasure and/or improved medical issues. You all deny these studies and cite your own. It’s like covid, every person has a study that he cites and supports and everybody has a conflicting study to support a different narrative. As for bodily autonomy, my point is that babies don’t have that, least of all among you pro-choice people who are claiming the right to destroy that life in utero up until natural birth. So why the su…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 06:20 PM
1

So the fact that men here are emotionally distraught about circumcision, which many men support and are perfectly happy to have had done, is unrelated to the fact that most intactivists are pro-abortion?! Let me get this straight: you can kill a baby, but you can’t do a medically beneficial thing for the baby?! Got it. Logic 101 escapes you. It’s not a red herring, it goes to the very heart of logical consistency.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 04:21 PM
1

The AAP has a defense of circumcision statement. I quoted them directly. It says that there’s enough medical benefit for the procedure that it should be reimbursed by insurers. You can cynically say that it’s all about money but other procedures like removal of tonsils and ear tubes have plummeted in frequency as the medical studies have limited the indications to a very narrow band. The AAP follows the science, they have to. As for your supposed abortion “red herring”, I don’t see your point at…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 04:02 AM
0

“Although health benefits are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision for all male newborns, the benefits of circumcision are sufficient to justify access to this procedure for families choosing it and to warrant third-party payment for circumcision of male newborns. It is important that clinicians routinely inform parents of the health benefits and risks of male newborn circumcision in an unbiased and accurate manner.”
/r/MensRights04/02/22 11:10 PM
0

No, they don’t. Do they decide what to eat? Where to live?! What language to speak?! Whether they are breastfed or bottle fed?! To take chemo or not?! To have surgery on an appendix or not? To get ear tubes, or antibiotics?! To take a vaccine?! I’m sorry that personal autonomy is not available to all of us, I wish that we could live as fully autonomous beings, but we can’t. I’d wager that 90% of intactivists are pro-choice. Go figure. “Don’t cut that foreskin, but kill that thing if you want to!…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 11:05 PM
0

Citing nonsense ideas by fringe lunatics doesn’t address the medical questions about circumcision. The studies are just as I stated, you just don’t like the results. The AAP reviewed all of this and their current statement is neutral or slightly positive. The anatomy is well known and the typical clitoral hood does not cover the glans in redundant fashion and is not easily removed without damaging the clitoris glans. Adult males who are circumcised notice no difference. That fact is a fact is a …
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:31 PM
0

Circumcision is as old as written history. It certainly did NOT originate in America lol! The clitoral hood does not completely cover the clitoral glans with redundant tissue like the foreskin does to the glans of the penis. Homologous tissues are not necessarily analogous tissues in terms of laxity or behavior. Removing the clitoral hood is damaging by necessity. The reviews were criticized; ok, I criticize the criticism. Dueling banjos of study analysis will get us nowhere. Just listen to the …
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:07 PM
0

There are lots of studies, not just the ones that I cited. There are reviews of “all” studies that comport with my statements. Meta analyses support my position. A clitoris does not have an easily, surgically removable foreskin, even though there are homologous structures as you stated. Nothing about removing the clitoral hood is analogous to removing the foreskin. There is zero laxity to the clitoral hood, there is zero redundancy to it.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 09:40 PM
0

There are a ton of studies showing that circumcision is safe and causes no loss of function or pleasure. In addition, there are modest medical benefits that likely are not significant enough to make it very highly medically recommended or required. There is still the question of decreased STDs related to the procedure, with studies on either side of the debate. Circumcision is however aesthetically and hygienically preferable to many people. It should be a choice that parents have and that intac…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 09:05 PM
-2

No, I have been flamed by people here who are circumcised and function just fine but cut off all ties to their parents because they feel cheated.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 04:11 PM
0

Agreed! The marginalization of men here who support traditional male and female roles is ridiculous. No man worth a darn has a problem raising a family and taking care of his wife and kids financially and physically. No man worth a darn really wants women in combat roles in the military.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 09:31 AM
-11

That circumcision is ok. Good grief the level of emotional nonsense around that issue is scary. Some of y’all are are as batty as feminists in your need to crusade against (fake) victimhood. Now go ahead, start the verbal assaults, insults, intolerance of different opinions…….just like a feminist…. Some of you guys have given yourselves mental disorders about being circumcised.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 09:28 AM
0

I asked my parents and they said it’s ok. They are supervising me.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:44 AM
-1

There’s not enough money in Texas that would cause me to take that job, or to laugh about getting a child rapist off scot free. She’s gross.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 11:17 PM
0

Whoa. She knew the guy was guilty and joked and laughed about getting him off the charge. Child rape! What the heck?!
/r/MensRights02/02/22 08:45 PM
0

Woke culture is insufferably sanctimonious. Puke on it. But you are polite and your point is reasonable, thanks.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 08:43 PM
1

The point of the comment was not religion. I’m not going to argue religion here.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 08:40 PM
2

She was laughing about it in her office while telling the story to somebody. Nasty. Mean. Gross.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 07:39 PM
-1

It is a very straightforward statement. That’s what.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 05:31 PM
-5

You guys are amazingly daft. What’s it like to go through life pretending to be more virtuous than God Himself?! To pretend that all comments require someone to take offense?! To put yourself on the side of the angels and cast all others into the outer darkness?! Bunch of modern Torquemadas.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 05:09 PM
-27

I read it twice and decided, no, it’s not better, you’re still being a woketard.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 04:51 PM
-38

So the irony of my comment was lost on you? Interesting…..a guy can’t even make an obvious joke these days with woke loonies. Woketards are so irritating.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 04:45 PM
-65

India. Not America. Lots of bad things happen in India, and yes, I have Indian friends and I’m married to a third world terrorist (she terrorizes me anyway) so you can’t cal me a raaaaacissttt, it’s not gonna work.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 04:12 PM
15

It’s only going to get worse. Get it out of your head and be the best at what you do and ignore the chatter and unfairness, it will drive you crazy.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 08:37 AM
1

Don’t count on any of that. Liberal judges will not see it your way at all. They make up their own laws and interpretation of laws.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 07:42 AM
6

Hillary Clinton literally defended a child rapist as an attorney in Arkansas early in her career. She laughed about getting him off the charge, knowing that he was guilty.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 07:27 AM
22

Sick girl needs jail time.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 12:47 AM
3

I have found that nobody agrees on definitions of sex versus gender, so that entry forms will say “gender “ meaning “sex” of the patient. It seems that on forums like this, “gender” means the social construct of one’s self-identified sex? A clear societal definitional bright line would be nice for all of us.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 01:04 PM
2

Everything a doctor does or evaluates you for depends on knowing your biological sex.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:51 PM
0

You’re not a woman at all. You’re a damn man faking to be a woman. No woman on earth would allow the definition of rape to be trivialized by equating it to circumcision. Weirdo.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:45 AM
1

Look up the word “rape” in a legal dictionary. Thanks. And get help.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:14 AM
1

Do you even know what the word “rape” means? That’s pathetic and weird. Get a psychiatrist. I “literally” did nothing, my wife signed the papers.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:37 PM
1

Excuse me weirdo, not appreciated. Circumcision is not rape. Get thee a shrink.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 10:46 PM
1

You sure have a lot of mental issues for an ex-Cheshire cat, most ex-Cheshire cats whom I’ve talked to are much nicer and happier than you.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 10:35 PM
1

No, it’s not the circumcision I’m worried about, it’s your generation of shrieking emotional snowflakes that worry me.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 10:32 PM
1

Well I opposed circumcision in a past life, but my wife insisted that our boys be circumcised and that was that. It seems that new fathers have zero rights to medical decisions of their newborns, and that’s an issue that won’t be resolved this side of the Great Divide. We could make that a men’s rights issue, although we can’t split the baby so to speak. Anyway, after my boys were circumcised more studies came out over the years and now I mildly support it or am indifferent to it. It’s shocking …
/r/MensRights30/01/22 08:42 PM
1

Haha! My dick is fine, but thanks for your concern about it. I don’t usually talk about my dick to people, but your interest in it is certainly appreciated. I think so anyway…..but your being a Cheshire Cat in a previous life does cause me a bit of trepidation.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 08:20 PM
28

Body shaming men publicly is ok, but body shaming women is not. That’s germane to this site in my opinion.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 07:41 PM
-1

Lol ok whatever. I’m pretty sure that if we blindfolded you that you couldn’t tell a circumcised penis from an uncircumcised one but let’s don’t do that experiment. Really let’s don’t.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 06:32 PM
-1

FGM is hardly done as a routine, that’s why. It’s very rare precisely because it is damaging. As for the rest of this argument, the studies of actual flesh and blood adults are what they are are: no difference. Deal with the facts, those are well-done studies. Period. We have ridden this horse as far as it will ride. Post whatever you want to, I know what I know. You can have the last word. Just don’t waste it on childish insults.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 01:43 PM
2

Yep. Gotta choose!
/r/MensRights30/01/22 01:39 PM
0

You are getting very emotional. I can cite plenty of other studies as well, there was a large review of several studies and it showed that circumcision has no detrimental effects. That isn’t to say that some patients do not suffer bad effects, but overall it’s very safe and not harmful. I have no idea why you think that you can dismiss major, large-scale, prospective clinical studies. Also, tactile stimulation studies showed no significant differences, although there were minor differences in ta…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:01 PM
0

Again, you insult me because that’s all you have. It’s pathetic but I understand that losing arguments is hard. Actual real life studies in Africa with very sexually active adult men showed that post circumcision, they were fine. You can always cherry pick data or individual stories if you want, but large studies show what they show! I don’t know what a “boomer” is really, except that my kids like to call me that as a pejorative term, thinking that it means something. It really means that they a…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:37 AM
2

I’m sorry but I have to laugh about this! I’m married for many years and I have to tell you that to have a relationship with a woman means dealing with this all the time. I have a huge extended family and it’s just the way it is: men and women see the world differently. Every man I know deals with this stuff. Women feel especially cheated by life in some way, life’s not fair to them compared to men, men are all bad because of this thing or that thing…. Sigh. If you want love and sex and a family…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:29 AM
-3

Lol. Histology proves nothing. There are nerve endings all over our skin. Real world studies show that men circumcised as adults notice no difference. That’s all that matters! Sheesh! You can pretend that I’m illiterate if you want to, I won’t bother you with my background, but it’s just a childish insult and means nothing to me. Argumentum ad verecundium is meaningless. The studies showed what they showed. Men circumcised as adults had no change in sexual pleasure or functioning. I’m sorry that…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:08 AM
-6

Histology proves nothing clinically. The fact is that adult men who get circumcised are fine and notice no difference. I am not coping with anything bad at all. This forum is openly and aggressively for men’s rights as against feminist aggression. I support that. It also is very tolerant of dissent, which I also support. Free speech for me and thee. All else is just fascist nonsense. Circumcision is to men’s rights what the death penalty is to Christians: reasonable people may rightly disagree a…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 10:46 AM
-9

I’m circumcised, not mutilated. I’m not being the crybaby, but the anti-circumcision crowd sure is. It’s not at all analogous to female genital mutilation. There’s no comparison. There is no loss of function from male circumcision. None. And I’m done doing dueling studies so don’t bother. There is plenty of evidence for my position, and some very bad evidence for the intactivist position, and then we are stuck with dueling studies.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 07:25 AM
4

Thanks for this. It’s awesome. No excuses, just a straight up “let’s be good Christians” message from a kind woman who “gets it”. I for one am not apologizing anymore: I am a Christian believer. I believe that God made men and women to be complementary to each other. Period. I believe that feminists have distorted the good and the true and the beautiful about men and women and our inter-relationships.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 11:50 PM
-10

We don’t have to be intactivists on this site please. Cut the nonsense. I’m for men’s rights, I’m not an intactivist and I’m sick of this theme coming up all the time. Quit the victimhood narrative.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 11:13 PM
0

Her conclusion was that clinical studies needed to be done and that the sensitivity was no different to most stimuli. I cited a real study with real adult men that showed no loss of pleasure or function after adult circumcision. It’s in my posts, look at it. It was the Ugandan study of adult men circumcised as adults. It was in the journal “Sexual Medicine”. http://www.tuleoffice.com/images/editor/File/pdf/book/IMPOTENCY/2%20(5).pdf Goodbye.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:29 AM
-1

No, read both links. The adult men notice no clinical difference post surgery. Their sexual satisfaction is the same as before circumcision. The article testing tactile stimulation concluded this: “Additionally, this study challenges past research suggesting that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the adult penis.” Details matter. Read the entire thing all over again in light of the study about sexual satisfaction after circumcision of adult males being unchanged. Good grief you believe …
/r/MensRights28/01/22 02:56 AM
0

Yes, and not clinically relevant.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 09:39 PM
1

And another: https://www.auajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.080
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:56 PM
1

I had to post just one: http://www.tuleoffice.com/images/editor/File/pdf/book/IMPOTENCY/2%20(5).pdf
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:54 PM
1

I’d cite a bunch of studies, including reviews of dozens of studies, that refute yours, that are all on Google Scholar, but I hate this back and forth and I hate copying and pasting links. They’re all easily accessible. I’ve done it before on this site and naysayers are gonna naysay. The medical establishment and the general public have accepted the procedure and it’s not really arguable except by crusaders. We’ve ridden this horse as far as she will ride. I’m happily circumcised, my brothers ar…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 12:35 PM
1

Get help. Seriously. FGM involves damaging the clitoris totally or closing the vagina. Male circumcision does not prevent sexual pleasure or functioning. If it did, how exactly do so many adult men who undergo the procedure notice no difference? How exactly did circumcised American and Jewish men father all those children for so many generations? How come they aren’t impotent or infertile or asexual? There is no female homologous operation to foreskin removal. The foreskin is just extra skin. Ye…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 09:38 AM
1

How in the name of all things good and true do You equate female “circumcision” (mutilation) with male circumcision! Good grief there’s zero comparison. I just can’t believe this stuff. You must be trolling.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 11:35 PM
-1

My brain function seems to be better by virtue of circumcision compared to all the shriekers here. My point about the the length of time over history that circumcision has both been done and not done by intermingling cultures is that if there were a dramatic difference on outcomes, and the circumcision group were having serious complications, it would have died a natural attrition death. Men aren’t stupid, they compare notes! And if the circumcised crowd had all kinds of horrible things happen, …
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:10 PM
0

You need a therapist. There are millions of happily circumcised men. It has been done for centuries. I was against it at one point in my life, was neutral when I started this conversation, but you histrionic children make me think that it must help brain function to be circumcised.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 02:37 AM
-1

The supposed histology of the nerve endings has nothing to do with clinical sensitivity. Studies of the sensitivity show no difference. Just use google scholar and look it all up, it’s all there.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 02:32 AM
0

False. There are nerve endings but they are no more or less sensitive clinically than any others. There are many studies of adult men who say that there is NO DIFFERENCE after circumcision. Good grief, teenaged boys who are circumcised are so sensitive that their biggest problem is premature ejaculation lol! Their least worry is lack of sensitivity. Holly cow the need to play victim is strong in you people. Just stop.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:28 AM
1

Please stop. You’re fine.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:22 AM
1

They are adults and can tell you if sex is changed for them. If anything, I would expect them to assume loss of functioning and sensitivity rather than the reverse. They were not unhappy. Why can’t you just accept facts?! Do you WANT to be a victim like feminists are pretending and doing?!
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:18 AM
1

And? They were told that HIV transmission is lower, but their sensitivity was tested postoperatively and it was no different.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 12:46 AM
0

Studies of the foreskin show that sensory nerve endings, although present of course, are clinically no more relevant to sensitivity than circumcised penis. This is proved by adult males who get circumcised. Good grief just stop the histrionics!
/r/MensRights26/01/22 12:45 AM
0

Nonsense. The homologous organ to a clitoris is the penile glans. Nobody is damaging the glans in male circumcision; the clitoris is damaged or destroyed in female genital mutilation. And worse happens too. Cut the ignorant histrionics.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 12:43 AM
-1

Female “circumcision “ is a totally different thing. It’s mutilation.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:47 PM
0

Studies disprove your ideas. FGM is a totally different thing and clitorises are not homologous to foreskins, not at all. Look at actual reports from adult men who undergo adult circumcision: no difference. Studies of infants show that there are no special receptors of clinical significance in the foreskin. I am totally indifferent to what anybody chooses, but I despise liars and crusaders who are full of nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:44 PM
1

No thanks. The center is held by ideologically confused people.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:29 PM
0

Read actual studies, thanks. African studies on HIV prevention showed a general acceptance of the procedure by adult, sexually active men. Facts are facts.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:29 PM
0

Freak. I’m circumcised and not unhappy with anything. I’m married and have children. Go back to your cave.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:27 PM
-1

It’s not the most sensitive part. That has been shown in studies. Adult men who get circumcised don’t know any difference.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 09:45 PM
-5

It’s not an industry lol. It’s driven by the parents. Actually, it’s driven by the moms. I guarantee you that it’s not a money maker for any individual hospital or doctor. The real money in Medicine is not in circumcisions!
/r/MensRights25/01/22 04:06 PM
-8

More garbage. I am indifferent about it, but it is safe and doesn’t cause harm. Some men need it as adults, and they are happy to have had it. Stop the lies and emotionalism. It’s not driven by money. No doctor who does circumcisions lives in my fancy neighborhood lol. The doctors who live in nice neighborhoods do real surgery or other lucrative specialities, not circumcisions lol. The reimbursement is terrible given the time involved, you don’t know healthcare economics so just stop.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 01:46 PM
-8

Circumcision had been popularly accepted precisely because all the horrible things that your citations pretend happen routinely, do not. They just don’t. Millions of happily circumcised men are not lying: it’s fine. Adults who get circumcised are not lying: it’s fine. You can cherry pick studies, I can pick ones that disprove all your claims. In the REAL world, circumcision is fine. Do it or don’t do it, but don’t crusade to stop it based on lies and made up nonsense like “babies are dying by th…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 01:23 PM
16

Everybody gotta make the “I’m no conservative knuckle dragger” disclaimer, even here. Why?! The smart folks are conservative and have no fear to say it. Our country is falling apart from lefties and their insanities.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:03 AM
6

I got kicked off two “women’s forums” for basically disagreeing with the “narrative”: men bad, women victims. I’m not even sure how or why I got kicked off, it was a disagreement about minor stuff and I spoke politely. Bang! Blocked! You are here spewing nonsense but nobody silences you. Big difference.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 03:07 AM
3

No, you should study more. There are numerous definitions of “Socialism”. There are numerous iterations of socialism. Look it up. Wikipedia even discusses that. Redistribution of wealth is socialism. A pig by any name is a pig. Semantic arguments are boring.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:20 PM
2

No, no Socialism at all. Social (In)Security? Check. Medicare? Check. Socialized Medicine? Check. Free education? Check.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:19 PM
4

That’s why the world has gone Socialist. Women love socialism.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 01:29 PM
39

No, it’s FDS and badwomensanatomy and two X that bash men, constantly. Heck, mainstream media bash men. The View bashes men. We are sick of it, hence this sub.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:48 AM
1

I participated in the economic system in America the same as anybody else, except that our company didn’t set prices on anything, prices were set for us. The resulting distortions of valuations made selling the company quite acceptable to me. Please tell me your methodology for setting prices of goods and services in a socialized healthcare system.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 07:33 PM
0

Lol. In most countries nobody acquires debt for cancer care because they can’t get any care! Start digging your hole. Bye again!
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:28 PM
-1

You don’t live here, you have no idea how the system works. If you get cancer, you will want to come to any one of our amazing university cancer centers. Bye!
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:18 PM
-1

You don’t live here, you don’t know anything.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 12:44 PM
0

Nobody goes to Canada or Mexico from America to “save their life” lol, unless they are looking for “alternative Medicine”, and getting scammed for fake cancer treatments. It’s amazing what people are willing to believe. The horror stories of people coming back from Mexico are very sad, but what would you know?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 12:35 PM
0

Whatever. I live here, I owned a medical corporation here, I know medical billing. Those who pay their bills are funding those who don’t. And there are plenty who don’t. The actual bills paid by insurance companies are shockingly low. I had a fundoplication operation 25 years ago. The surgeon got a whopping $700, and the hospital got $1900. I wanted to give them both a huge bonus, because that operation is worth WAY more than that. I feared that the only way to make that work out is for them to …
/r/MensRights19/01/22 11:45 AM
1

I don’t know, and neither does the media lol, the specifics of that ONE outlier medical bill. Suffice it to say that I have 6 children and never paid any such amount for any of them, and neither do 99% of pregnant women. People without insurance end up paying nothing of the bill , or very little, or negotiate a fee that is reasonable. In my practice we charged uninsured patients the Medicare allowable, which is peanuts compared to private insurance, which is peanuts compared to the posted charge…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 11:32 AM
-5

lol. You don’t know medical billing. Hospitals have set charges or fees, but insurance companies never pay the charged amounts, they have contracts that lower those amounts significantly. What is billed is totally different from what is paid. Typical payments for an uncomplicated vaginal birth would be a few thousand dollars to the medical Facility. That is separate from the doctor fees, which are about $800 for the entire prenatal care and delivery over the 9 months. You don’t even know what yo…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 10:54 AM
-7

It’s not assembly line surgery. Cataract surgery is done in surgery centers in assembly line fashion, but circumcisions are not. That’s because the person doing it is the person who delivered the baby or the pediatrician of the baby, and not some assembly line hospital-based surgeon. The actual procedure is quick, but the surgeon has to leave his office, where he makes his real money these days, drive to the hospital, talk to the family, get scrubbed in and prepped, do the procedure, talk to the…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 09:16 AM
-9

Sigh. Hospitals do not sell the procedure, and they don’t make a lot of money off it. Holy cow do some research about medical economics. The doctors who do it make very little and they are the ones who are on the hook for complications. They get paid almost nothing for it once they take out their overhead and once you look at the time investment on their part.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 04:40 AM
-17

I get tired of this stupid argument. There is plenty of scientific support for circumcision as a safe procedure. It’s not necessary, but it doesn’t cause harm. And it has some medical benefits. Just give this subject a rest please. And I’ve read all the studies so don’t bother. I’ve heard all the arguments so don’t bother. I was against it at one point but now I favor it slightly/ am mostly indifferent. Stop with the histrionics about mutilation, it’s nonsense. It doesn’t affect sexual functioni…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 04:37 AM
2

Corporations are people working in concert to provide goods and services that people want and pay for out of free will. Governments are authoritarian entities that impose their will on people. The worst mayhem committed on this planet has been by governments. Hundreds of Millions dead from governments . Read Thomas Sowell.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 04:42 PM
20

Ok so you get to decide what can be handled? How about letting free people decide as free economic actors in the economy? Freedom, it’s good for you.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:09 PM
21

Ok let’s go for 63, can’t hurt can it?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:07 PM
24

Ok make retirement at age 40! Problem solved. Better yet, outlaw work! Work sucks.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:02 PM
22

Why is the government choosing sides on retirement age and making it beneficial to women as opposed to men? If your argument is that think 64 is good for all, even men, why not 63? Why not 56! Why not just give everybody everything free for life?! That’s the problem with Socialism, you end up determining everything by legislative fiat and not organically allowing people to live freely.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:00 PM
2

There are some feminists who call all spreading apart of legs by men “man spreading”. There are people on buses who will call you out for any degree of separation of your legs. There are videos of crazy feminists attacking men for doing just that. I have experienced, and seen myself and other men naturally spreading their legs, and most women deal with the encroachment, even though it might be ever so slight but very real, politely by accepting that men do that physiologically. I have had other …
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:02 PM
12

Men naturally sit like that even when all alone in a church pew. I have watched and seen it happen, I have done it myself. One hypothesis is that our hips are different from women’s; the other hypothesis is of course to give room for the genitalia. All I know is that it’s routine and natural and has nothing to do with aggravating women or sexual display of any kind. I think it’s the latter explanation, I do it alone in bed because crushing gonads is not fun. Now stop being a gadfly irritant.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:08 AM
2

Why is it wrong for her to do that? All the Leftists who are capable of cognitive dissonance (there are a few) are admitting to themselves that they really don’t have a problem with this, since they support abortion rights up to the time of full term birth, and nobody can say why being inside a uterus at one moment and outside at the next changes the ontological essence of a thing. So why is it wrong?! Hello abortion activists, ready to admit the truth, that you don’t care about truth?
/r/MensRights13/01/22 09:03 PM
4

I’m doubtful that Whiteness has anything to do with anything. Femaleness has everything to do with it. Female privilege.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 07:16 PM
47

People don’t realize that the movies are fake. Slamming ppl to the ground can break a spine. A punch to the face can kill.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:32 PM
2

Well fair enough, thanks for your polite and considered reply!
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:53 PM
0

The laboratory guy who killed himself knew that real patients were harmed by false lab results. People may have died from that, or been put on medications or treated for conditions they didn’t have. Are you paying attention?
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:49 PM
1

She harmed patients with false lab results. It’s entirely possible that people died from that. Her monetary fraud very likely harmed retirees and people who invested a high percentage of their net worths! Just stop with the easy forgiveness for a nasty criminal like her. A man committed suicide due to her shenanigans! There likely are others who died or had severe harm including psychological.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 12:46 PM
1

It’s not “just cells” that are aborted. Fetuses with heads and arms and legs and a heartbeat are aborted. Besides, you are “just cells”. At what stage of development of the embryo/fetus, since you’re so good at embryology lol, would you confer protection on the “thing” inside the uterus that the woman created and that is a human being, except it’s “just cells”? (Abortions are often legal up until the “thing” pops out at the ninth month).
/r/MensRights08/01/22 06:11 AM
1

Um, no. I never said anything about you. Try reading comprehension. I said, “your parents obliged you. “ I said, “you’re not obligated to do anything.” My kids are very happy, they had great childhoods. They love me very much and I love them very much. We have great relationships. Thanks for your concern, but all is good for them and me and between them and me. I fail to see what you’re worried about.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:29 PM
1

You aren’t “obligated” to do anything. Your parents obliged you of their free will.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 02:55 PM
1

Again, demographics don’t bear out your assertion. The dire predictions of the PopulationBomb never happened. Ehrlich famously lost bets on his predictions.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 02:39 PM
1

All true. But my kids are everything. Until you attend your own kids’ birth, you won’t know. A life without pain is not available to you. Don’t think that a solitary life is pain-free. The only things that had any value to me came with a lot of struggle and pain. Life on a care-free beach is hell.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 01:37 PM
2

Don’t let the bastards drag you down. Your life is yours to live still, they haven’t put us in gulags yet lol! Fight for your rights, live the “good life” however you define it, with love and laughter, all the while knowing that they are against you. There are many wholesome women out there who love men, you just have to keep an open mind. All ideas are religious in the final analysis, since they are not provably true. Find yourself a wholesome religious girl. That’s just my two cents, but don’t…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:49 PM
2

The numbers don’t lie. Demographic facts are that the French and Japanese are committing suicide. I carry no brief for any particular race or racial category; but I don’t want to see French or Japanese (or others!) people disappear! Call me crazy, but that only makes sense. China is reversing its one baby per family policy before they face societal collapse.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:33 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:30 PM
2

Your facts are just wrong. Birthrates are below replacement rates. It won’t take long for that to be a disaster; it’s demographic suicide. Labeling me might a pejorative might help your limbic brain get a thrill, but adds nothing to rational discussion or analysis of the problem.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:50 AM
2

I don’t think that men are “disposable”, but I do believe that men are meant to be protectors of their families. If that puts their lives at greater risk, then so be it. In return, the man should receive the love and respect as “head of the household” (don’t mistake that for dictatorship; it’s as much about responsibility as authority) that he deserves by virtue of being the main provider and protector. That system worked well for centuries. If a man is not willing to risk his life ahead of his …
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:47 AM
24

The crazy UCLA female professor of Egyptology who falsely claimed that Kyle Rittenhouse killed two Black men barely apologized for the lie, then deflected and blamed the “patriarchy” for everything bad happening in the world. Wtf?!
/r/MensRights07/01/22 04:41 AM
3

I see your point, but disagree to the extent that the traditional family structure is something that I support and will fight for in my household. In return for a loving and caring wife and kids, I will sacrifice for them. If women wanna cancel me, then I agree, I’m out. If my efforts aren’t appreciated, then I would go mgtow. I am lucky that I am older than you and didn’t feel the need to go that route.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 04:39 AM
2

Agreed. I’ve been banned from several subreddits for nothing other than disagreeing with the liberal narrative of the subreddit. My interest is in discussion with people who disagree with me, not having an echo chamber. The only places I CAN go now are echo chambers that agree with me!
/r/MensRights07/01/22 04:34 AM
3

We aren’t even at replacement rates. We will lose entire genetic populations. Economic collapse could occur, since productivity will plummet.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 10:57 PM
3

We don’t have exponential increase, we have demographic suicide. Replacement rates in “developed” countries are plummeting. Paul Ehrlich and his dire predictions (and those of his ilk) all proved false. If we used nuclear energy, we would likely have few problems at all! Doomsday scenarios are almost always nonsense. Food production capacity is much greater than we even need. If you bring such capabilities to second and third world countries, we will be fine.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:07 PM
3

There are entire countries committing demographic suicide. China is finally calling for fecundity. Europe and Japan could collapse. Your Malthusian nonsense has been disproved time and again.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 06:43 PM
10

Nature kills everyone eventually. Let’s not shorten the time frame intentionally.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 06:18 PM
8

Did the female not have control over her pregnancy? Interesting idea….99% of abortions are not about rape, so…..what is the malfunction?!
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:55 PM
6

Thanks for your kind post. Sorry about the insults you endured here. Your post is appreciated by most of us I’m willing to bet. It’s a shame that relationships between the sexes have degenerated to this point. It’s not good.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 03:37 AM
124

They’re crazy man-haters. Calling men “scrotes” is their thing, unless you’re a “high value man”. I doubt many of them are high value women unless a man is a masochist who wants an excuse to kill himself.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 12:55 AM
9

Good for you. You’re tilting at windmills. Take up the cudgel, but my experience is that people are NOT interested in truth. Even here, the level of emotionalism about infant male circumcision is scary. You can’t make people accept facts. Facts can always be denied or manipulated by special interest groups. People believe what they want to believe and don’t bother even opening their minds to both sides.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 09:27 PM
-1

These guys are like feminists looking to be victims.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:41 PM
-2

And you noticed no difference in sensation. Admit it and tell these guys the truth.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:38 PM
54

She knew that the systems didn’t work. She defrauded very wealthy and very sophisticated people of a ton of money. A chief biotechnologist at Theranos told her the systems were bogus. Patients were hurt by false lab results too. No sympathy. I know of no men who committed fraud on that scale or that dangerous to others who got off Scott free. If they did, it doesn’t make her innocent and undeserving of prosecution, it means that we need more prosecutions. Liberals always want to lower standards …
/r/MensRights05/01/22 04:13 AM
-1

Sometimes yes, agreed. But too many violent criminals go free. Any action of violence should be punished severely.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 03:53 PM
1

Fair enough point, thanks.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 03:34 PM
4

Standards were lowered for men in many arenas so as to allow women into the arena. Policemen, firemen, and military standards were lowered. In Illinois, State Police used to have to be 6’2” tall minimum. That’s gone now since almost no women would qualify. They couldn’t make it only for men, so….. Fire departments also lower standards to allow women to pass. Military has lower standards now too.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 02:17 PM
1

Which I oppose by the way. But, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 02:14 PM
11

Criminals belong in jail. Females deserve the exact same prison time for the same offenses. Instead, what will happen if you politicize the disparity (which is quite reasonable to do, actually) is that liberals will let everybody out of jail instead of putting women into jail. That’s how Social Justice Warriors behave: “oh, there’s a disparity. Let’s end the disparity by lowering standards on everyone!”
/r/MensRights04/01/22 12:36 PM
1

Women are allowed to compete in men’s sports, but not vice versa. That’s a men’s rights issue. Girls in high school wrestling for example.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 12:26 PM
-2

Sigh. I said I wouldn’t do this… There are a ton of studies of normal adult males given circumcision in Africa to see if it would reduce rates of HIV transmission, and those men did not experience decreased sensation. They were quite happy. They have done other studies that show that there is nothing special about the foreskin for sensation. Good grief, we are into dueling studies. Tons of men have adult circumcision and notice no difference. None. Zilch. Just use google scholar. Now I’m out of …
/r/MensRights03/01/22 02:03 AM
-6

Thanks. I won’t debate you about the circumcision thing, it’s not worth my time and effort, but I do appreciate your reply about the other issue, much appreciated. Happy New Year!
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:57 PM
-10

I had decided not to debate the circumcision issue, since I’ve gone there before, and people refuse to believe the medically published studies that prove to any rational person’s satisfaction that circumcision does not affect sensation to any degree. It’s all available on google scholar. However, your nonsense post about sexual abuse victims has to be addressed: you’re crazy. I never said anything at all about sexual abuse victims. Now can I have my “oxygen trees” back? Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:52 PM
-51

I’ve waded into this before. I’m not going to say more than this. Plenty of studies show no loss of sensation from adult circumcision. Adults can tell you that there’s NO CHANGE after circumcision. This is just emotional theater based on nothing. I don’t know why this site goes all bananas over this issue, it’s really acting like butt-hurt feminists over nothing.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 01:33 PM
1

I think more specificity is required to clarify your post. What sorts of misogyny occur here that disturb you?! I mostly see examples of posts that point out misandry from feminists and complain about that. You should see feminist sites! The misandry is amazing. [Ok, my spellchecker did not know the word “misandry”. It did not offer it to me. But it did immediately offer “misogyny” as I began to type that word! Try it for yourself, iPhone.]
/r/MensRights02/01/22 02:12 AM
2

Bergoglio is a very stupid man, and doesn’t preach any gospel other than socialist SJW nonsense.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 04:59 PM
1

“Let your yes mean yes and your no mean no. Anything else is of the evil one.” Don’t troll. It makes these forums quite ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:39 PM
12

Totally agree. The idiot shoots the gun at the ground near the decedent’s foot in a reckless and unnecessary act of aggression before the decedent grabs the barrel of the gun, then bam, the perp shoots the poor decedent for nothing!
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:12 AM
2

I’m pretty sure that men did all The fighting and dying to protect the tribe and hearth and home from invasions and war and starvation. The women died in childbirth. We didn’t invent that problem.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 03:29 PM
6

Supportive wives?! Pffft. That’s a thing of the past.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:27 AM
1

Well you should not be banned for that post. It’s benign, not rude, and merely a sarcastic opinion statement that should be allowed to be expressed. Those gals are toxic as heck. If a men’s group were that toxic toward women, the Left would have a group seizure.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 03:38 PM
1

Yeah that explains a lot to me, apparently there are bots that will ban you from one site if you belong to another. I want free speech!!!! Ugh.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 03:20 PM
1

You’re pigeonholing conservatives because some crazy judge whom you labeled a “conservative” made a cuckoo bird ruling in Kansas in the 1990s?! Umkay, if you wanna roll that way…..but I disagree. I use labels, they are convenient shorthands, but to lump all conservatives under the monstrous tent that you want to put them under is going too far for my taste. I definitely don’t belong at liberal MensRights after visiting that place, I have much more in common here. Almost all of my conservative fr…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 07:39 AM
1

I don’t support disparate rape laws. I don’t support disparate sentencing. I don’t support divorce laws as they generally are. I don’t support non biological fathers being forced to pay for the financial support of their non biological children. I don’t know any conservatives who support any of those things. The military draft? I outlined my differences so we don’t need to go over that again. Circumcision is a big yawner and I don’t see why you would even use the phrase “genital mutilation”, sin…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 06:51 AM
7

Feminine deodorant spray.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 01:47 AM
4

Yeah, it’s a quirk of the first amendment. I think we should fix it so that content creators (you and I) have free speech rights on public platforms. Reddit does not create content.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:00 PM
1

I don’t believe in “gender equality”, that’s why I am on this site. It would take way too long for me to explain what I do believe: I certainly believe in equal pay for equal work; equal dignity of all persons before the law and before God. I believe that women who are equally capable for a job should take the job if they want it. I don’t believe that women are equally qualified to do many jobs, ON AVERAGE, as men are. I don’t believe that men are equally qualified to do many jobs, ON AVERAGE, a…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:26 PM
1

I saw that coming a mile away. I am not ok with anybody being in combat lol. But war is a fact of life. Men, not women, should fight wars. I’m sorry that bothers you. My Dad was in WW2, actual combat. I would wish that on nobody; Neither would he. But he sure as heck didn’t want his sisters there instead, because he was a man’s man. That’s a concept that I believe in, despite the feminization of society.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 06:35 PM
2

But you’re talking about drafting all women! For possible combat roles. I could be wrong about your meaning and I am not opposed to registration of women for some kinds of roles. Finally, I’m not opposed to all women in combat roles. I don’t want my daughter in combat. Sorry.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:43 PM
0

I just hate the censorship of YT, Reddit, Twitter, and FB. Why should they decide what GroupThink is acceptable?! It really is Orwellian, which I realize is a trope (and trite maybe).
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:01 PM
1

Fair enough, thanks.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:25 PM
51

I really hate simps. If a woman did that to me, at the least she’s getting physically subdued and wrapped into a pretzel until she acts right.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:50 PM
5

My experience with combat veterans is that they “all” agree that the women were a net detriment to combat situations. I admit that I am not an expert and my experience is anecdotal, but the men tell me that they end up carrying loads of stuff that women cannot. The women lag behind routinely. I certainly doubt that I could carry an 80 pound backpack and I would not be a good combat candidate. And I’m likely stronger than at least 75% of women (probably higher). Combat army ain’t no joke. There’s…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:46 PM
2

Well that’s what I call trolling: saying something you don’t believe to piss people off. I don’t do that, I understand why it gets people banned, even though I oppose banning for that. The best way to handle trolls is to disengage from discussion with them.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:29 PM
3

Well that sucks. I don’t know what Qanon is, have no interest in finding out, don’t know if it “exists” or not, but I think you should be able to say that if you want to.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:03 PM
0

Well that’s true, I haven’t, because I don’t need or want to converse with people who think exactly as I do or where I can’t learn anything. MensRights is edgy for me bc I don’t agree with everything, and I learn things, and I can be me! It’s a win for my time. A whiney insular group who kicks people out is boring. Heck, I’ve been insulted and cursed at some sites and I never reported anybody about it. Let them show their true colors! (I quit on Reddit, deleted most posts, came back to this site…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:01 PM
1

I didn’t flame anybody, no foul language, just simple disagreements about the prevailing ideology. I’d go to the trouble of proving my case but it’s not worth it. If people want echo chambers, let them have it. It’s boring to me. I’d much rather spend time discussing with a person who disagrees with me, I might end up learning something, he or she might end up seeing my point of view. Who knows? As it is, they have their mutual admiration societies, screw it. I can’t change it. Reddit doesn’t ca…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:57 AM
3

Yeah so I could be ok with compulsory registration for the draft if it meant that women would be in non combat roles. Anyway, we can have this discussion freely here. Trust me, you can’t discuss similarly controversial things on r/badwomensanatomy, or r/news, or r/evolution, or r/femininedatingstrategies What good is an echo chamber?! I hate it.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:56 AM
3

Try badwomensanatomy. Try femininedatingstrategy. Try News. Try evolution. All of them will ban you in one post that disagrees with the narrative they are pushing at any given moment, which can be somewhat fluid even.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:23 AM
4

I think that MRAs can rightly disagree about that one issue. This tent has to be big enough to include both sides of that issue; in fact, there are likely several sides to that. For example, I would be ok with women registering for the military if they are in non combat roles. I am willing to be corrected after discussion of the issue, but how could I change my mind without this site’s moderators allowing us to “argue”/discuss the issue?! Too many sites kick off people for having different opini…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:19 AM
1

Are you British? You seem to have a severe inferiority complex. You should, if so. Your once great country is pathetic, and Socialism is to blame. All you socialists are angry little demons.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 05:04 AM
1

I never participated in an abortion or ever sought one for anybody, I never got a girl pregnant out of wedlock, I never had an abortion with my wife, so your argument is nonsense.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 04:27 AM
1

Nice. If love of neighbor is accepting their choices, how about accepting my choice to let me keep my income for me and my family and stop forcing me to pay for your free schooling, abortions, and healthcare. I don’t want your stupid social security, I want freedom. (And don’t tell me not to take the money at retirement after you already stole it from me and offer it back in dribs and drabs, if I live long enough. ) Choice! I want choice. The government is very inefficient at providing goods and…
/r/MensRights27/12/21 04:25 AM
1

False. Love of neighbor is not abortion. It is not socialism. It is not about stealing. Studies have shown that Republicans are more generous with their actual donations of time and talent than democrats are. Socialist countries are very de-Christianized countries. The people in the pews are mostly conservatives. Government redistribution only enriches people like Pelosi and Obama and al gore and the Clintons. The poor suffer from inflation created by printing fake money with fake IOUs. Watch Ca…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:54 PM
1

The widow voluntarily contributed from her savings. She had almost nothing. The point of the parable was to counter the argument, prevalent at that time, that the person who contributes more in total, actual amount of money, is “holier” in God’s eyes. That was how the Jews at the time stratified their position in the synagogues. The Pharisees often bragged about how much they gave, how much they prayed, etc. Jesus never once said that all persons should actually do what she did. He said, her sac…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 01:47 PM
1

Jesus never exhorted all of his followers to give away all their money. He asked one particular rich man to give away all of his possessions and follow him. It’s likely that Jesus was calling the rich man to be an apostle. For THIS man, it was a bridge too far. Prior to that, all Jesus asked him to do was to follow the 10 commandments. That alone was enough to justify him before God. Period. Democrats are hypocrites. Obama lives like a king; why doesn’t he help out the poor Blacks in the hood lo…
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:53 PM
1

Yeah, Jesus loves abortionists and socialist thieves, it’s right there in the NT lol. Also, he loves race hustlers and criminal politicians who line their pockets while destroying the Middle Class with devaluation of the dollar. How rich is Obama? The Clintons? The Pelosis? Fauci? Al Gore? Maxine Racist Waters? The richest politicians are Democrats, grifters who never created a product or hired hundreds of workers in their lives.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:05 PM
1

A feminazi is a “feminist Nazi”. It’s derogatory toward officious female feminists who insist on having their way; it does not apply to Pence. Am I misunderstanding your post?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:01 PM
4

I am barely using Reddit now. Screw the place, when bad opinions get you banned from subreddits. I don’t like echo chambers. What nonsense. These companies don’t believe in free speech. What’s the point of social media, to hear yourself talk?! Screw the whole project.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 12:57 PM
3

I stopped posting on any feminist sites because that’s all they want, echo chambers. At least here dissent is allowed.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 04:36 PM
8

Both of these clowns are disgusting. SJWs are full of hate.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:16 AM
0

No woman who knows what she is aborting, her own child, would do that. They have been indoctrinated to believe it’s a “clump of cells” up until it magically becomes a baby just before term delivery. Of course, we are all “just clumps of cells” when you get down to it. What does that clump of cells represent? That’s the question.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:26 PM
3

Awfully aggressive reply when I did no such thing or advocated any such thing. Cut back on the steroids.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 08:14 PM
4

Maybe, but typos are routine with texting on phones now. They are easily repeatable too. The only word that makes sense is “photographing”. Autocorrect probably took him to “photographic”. Your opinion is as good as mine on this though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/21 07:35 PM
20

On the ACT, males perform as well as or slightly better than females. Gotta look elsewhere for explanation of disparity in numbers admitted.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:10 PM
2

The simple part is that people have the right to look with their eyeballs anywhere they want to. My body my choice 😂
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:34 PM
56

People don’t understand that not all labor or production can be monetized. That’s life. Raising your children is a labor of love. If you don’t love your kids enough to do it for “love sake”, then don’t have kids. Where would the money come from and why? Who sets the valuation on the labor? Only free markets can set valuations.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 06:03 PM
1

Most Women don’t go shirtless though. Why not? Because they know…..
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:27 PM
1

Fake. We all know that men without shirts are not a big deal. We also know that women dress provocatively to provoke the male gaze. This crazy lady did that whole thing on purpose.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:49 PM
1

He didn’t stare, he glanced. She set herself up for being glanced at. Do beautiful girls in bikinis on the beach REALLY think that no men are glancing?! They know it, they like it, then they act all upset when the wrong kind of man glances. Female privilege.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:12 PM
1

But why? Why is nakedness frowned on? Why can’t she be naked? Why would glancing at a naked woman be expected but glancing at a tightly form-fitted fake workout suit not be expected? She got what she wanted: Attention to her body.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:01 PM
1

Because free speech> censored speech.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:58 PM
1

If she were naked would she get stares? End of discussion.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:52 PM
1

Fuck yourself. Human nature is human nature.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:50 PM
2

😂
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:47 PM
2

My wife works out, but not in that kind of outfit. How about shorts?! It’s really simple but you gotta play the “pretend we don’t all see what we really see” game.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:42 PM
1

She got the attention she craves. Now she wants to whine about it. Yeah lady, don’t dress provocatively and you won’t get ogled [we all know that’s what you sought anyway].
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:40 PM
13

Suzanne Venker on YT coaches women on how to understand and treat men. It helped solve my marital problems. Feminism is toxic.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:26 PM
4

Photographing people. Transitive verb.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/21 03:16 PM
3

The James Cameron version of the Titanic was one big slander against British men. I’ll get to my point in a second…..but the men on the Titanic, ONCE they all realized that the ship was definitely sinking (there was doubt about that for some time) AND learned that there were not enough lifeboats for everybody, all put the women and children onto the the lifeboats first. (Some women refused to leave their husbands behind and went down with the ship) There was NO need for a gunman to enforce the r…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 02:44 AM
1

The guy is not an “unlicensed doctor “, he’s not trained to be a doctor by any definition of the term. Very misleading headline.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 10:40 PM
68

That place is toxic as hell. Calling men “scrotes” is vile and childish. Imagine a similar men’s site calling women the C word routinely.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 03:30 PM
1

That is the opposite of the conclusions of the article. Read the conclusions.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:20 PM
0

Maybe so lol. I cite links to those articles on other sites without any issues. I got a bot here that said that links are not allowed unless…..and from there I said screw it…… So yeah, maybe i should take classes on how to “Reddit internet”. Or maybe google scholar is not allowing copy and paste on those citations. Anyway, I don’t care, because the crowd here is a groupthink nightmare that refuses to look at the other side. I have studied the issue from both sides, and, like Saint Paul concluded…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:13 PM
-5

It’s real. The claim that 200 infants die annually in the US from circumcision is a total fabrication. They called at all mortality of infants in the postop circumcision period deaths due to circumcision to arrive at those numbers. Actual cause of death is never the circumcision procedure per se. (Never meaning over a 10 year period none were seen. It could happen, but it would be so rare as to be “never”.). If 200 kiddos died annually, you can bet that parents would have stopped circumcision a …
/r/MensRights29/11/21 03:23 AM
-2

Yes it does. Use google scholar.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 03:13 AM
-5

One study found zero deaths in circumcisions in America over a 10 year period. Babies do not die of circumcision. I would cite the article but my citations get deleted here.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 02:15 AM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724395/
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:52 AM
1

There are no correlates of the somatosensory experiences and the histological findings of Meissners corpuscles.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:50 AM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15833526/
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:49 AM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724395/
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:47 AM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26185672/
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:45 AM
1

Sigh. I send the links to actual articles. When I tap on my post, the articles come up.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:43 AM
1

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=foreskin+nerve+endings+and+sexual+functioning+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DKLBr9TD5ExUJ
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:12 AM
-1

If that were true, then adult men would be very unhappy after circumcision as adults. They are not.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:08 AM
-1

Most studies of circumcision performed on adult men show no harm from the surgery. Aggregated studies show this too, use google scholar and look at all the studies. Also, look on YouTube for videos by men circumcised as adults: they’re fine. It doesn’t cause sexual dysfunction nor does it cause loss of sensation. Facts are facts.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 11:56 PM
-10

This is nonsense. I am circumcised and quite happy with that. So are my brothers and so are my sons. You are an ideologue who ignores science, which shows that it’s basically neutral or positive for health overall. Leave people alone to choose for their own families. What’s next, forcing people to raise their kids according to YOUR rules and regulations? No thanks.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:35 PM
3

A white Knight is a person who defends women ya clown. The garb was white; the person under the garb of a Knight could be any color you loser.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 04:21 PM
3

Lol. You’re so ignorant that you don’t know that “white Knight” has nothing to do with race.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:48 PM
4

I’m married with children. I retired early and quite comfortably, at least until Biden destroys the value of the currency. I have said nothing sexist. I have said nothing except “you’re special”. You sound like a White Knight Virtue Signaler.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:29 PM
2

You’re special.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:25 PM
10

The idiot shot at the dad’s foot unnecessarily. That’s when it got heated. There was no cause to get a gun in the first place. There was only a cause to get the son and not the gun!
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:22 AM
-4

Nonsense! https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/deaths
/r/MensRights27/11/21 12:10 PM
0

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=adult+circumcision+and+sexual+functioning+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DRs0724a1B3QJ It’s all in your head. Your upper head, not your lower one.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:01 AM
1

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=adult+circumcision+and+sexual+functioning+&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DRs0724a1B3QJ
/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:00 AM
-1

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0090429504013433 Men circumcised as adults notice no difference in large studies. I’m sorry that bothers you. Just watch YouTube videos of men who talk about their adult circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 05:57 AM
1

Men aren’t interested in the humanities much any more. College is about feminists tormenting real men for being oppressors. Why would a man want to pay for that kind of classroom abuse?!
/r/MensRights27/11/21 01:01 AM
0

What I am saying is that a person circumcised as an infant can’t can’t tell the difference, so the only studies that matter are prospective trials of adults who can tell the difference between before and after. The foreskin is extra skin. It is not more sensitive than the skin that is left behind. A circumcised penis is not deficient in sensory nerve endings. That was shown in one of the studies I cited. Look it up on google scholar. Penile skin is penile skin.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 07:58 PM
1

The only studies that matter are those that prospectively evaluate adult men before and after they are circumcised as adults who are experienced in having sex prior to their circumcisions. And most such studies show no loss of sensation. Period. I’m sorry that bothers you. It’s just how it is. A review of all such studies tilts heavily toward that conclusion!! Watch YouTube videos of guys talking about their circumcisions. They generally are favorable.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:41 PM
-1

Did you read the entire conclusions? “Additionally, this study challenges past research suggesting that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the adult penis. “
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:03 PM
0

That’s a better study than most intactivists cite for their beliefs. It is not very convincing, however, that circumcision adversely affects most adults who are circumcised as adults. It is at odds with most studies, but I concede that it’s at Least some evidence for the anti-circ side.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:39 PM
0

Thanks for your considerate reply. That’s not a real study. They compared two separate groups of people, one set already circumcised, and the other not circumcised. One set had three times as many persons in it, making it unbalanced! They then compared subjective experiences of sexual activity in questionnaires between those two unbalanced sets of people, and found that circumcised people reported more sexual difficulties. The problem is that you can’t tell if your set of patients have a selecti…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:16 PM
1

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=circumcision+penile+sensitivity+in+neonates+&oq=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DKLBr9TD5ExUJ
/r/MensRights26/11/21 11:49 AM
0

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=circumcision+penile+sensitivity+in+neonates+&oq=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DKLBr9TD5ExUJ
/r/MensRights26/11/21 11:49 AM
1

Ok. Also there are plenty. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0090429504013433
/r/MensRights26/11/21 11:47 AM
0

Watch YouTube videos of real life patients. Why would they lie about their experiences?! There are men who talk about their circumcisions and are quite happy that they had it done. Watch the videos! I didn’t make that up. The studies on circumcisions are conducted mostly by non surgeons. There is no financial incentive. The studies were done to lower HIV transmission rates in Africa by epidemiologists who are not paid to do surgery. There are nerve conduction studies that show that patients noti…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 11:46 AM
-4

Adult males who are circumcised for medical reasons notice no difference after the circumcision. The glans is very sensitive either way. Removing excess skin on a person who is obese and has lost weight does not mean they lose innervated skin! They still have sensation of the skin left behind. The foreskin is excess skin; remove it and you still have innervated skin. And the glans. You have no reason to criticize the studies done in Africa: they are what they are. Ask any male adult who had medi…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:32 AM
-5

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=circumcision+sensitivity+in+adult+males+&oq=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DLA8ToabbGAQJ At a minimum, circumcision is not a serious issue that adversely affects sexuality. I don’t care if people do it or not, but it’s not genital mutilation by any means whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:33 AM
-3

I could not find any evidence of those claims other than the IntactWiki article, which itself doesn’t provide any proof of such claims. The article I cited is a review of numerous OTHER peer-reviewers articles, and as such is not original research by Morris. The fact that he is a circumcision supporter could be due to the medical evidence that he adduced in that article. It’s like saying “oh you believe in herd immunity against covid, therefore anything you say about herd immunity I suspect beca…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:31 AM
2

Ironically making my point for me?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 03:06 AM
-26

Nonsense. Review of many studies: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=circumcision+sensitivity+in+adult+males+&oq=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3Dv5kflyn8QZsJ Circumcision is fine, do it or don’t, it doesn’t matter.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:35 AM
-2

A systematic review of many studies: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C14&q=circumcision+sensitivity+in+adult+males+&oq=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3Dv5kflyn8QZsJ
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:00 AM
16

Everything isn’t about race. Apparently she was raped. Apparently she was raped by a Black Man. Is THAT fact something racially related that you wish to discuss? Or is the perpetrator’s race not relevant? Shall we discuss FBI stats on crime?
/r/MensRights25/11/21 07:54 PM
-10

I’m circumcised, my brothers are, my kids are. It’s not a big deal either way. Studies prove that. Use google scholar and see for yourselves. Intactivists ignore the scientific studies that show no difference in sensitivity. None. Adult males circumcised as adults notice no difference. Facts are facts. Emotions are emotions.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 06:25 PM
6

Reading comprehension is your strong suit?! The article said that she picked a different man in the police lineup. Then on the witness stand, after they charged this man, she accused him! “On the witness stand, Sebold identified him as her rapist.” Now is that reasonable to you?!
/r/MensRights24/11/21 08:01 PM
6

How are such jokes funny? They’re very predictable and unoriginal. So tell us how a small penis joke can be funny. Are beef curtain jokes about labia funny?! Are Clitoris size jokes funny? I never laughed at any such jokes because they’re not funny. Big lips, fat thighs? Are those funny joke material? Height? Weight? I’m perfectly willing to laugh at anything that’s funny, but it’s just not. It’s not clever or original. Ever.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 03:51 PM
3

Title nine destroys male sports that bring in no money and support women’s sports that bring in no money. Title nine creates kangaroo courts where ken accused of date rape cannot face their accuser and are subject to school professors as judges rather than having a jury trial and legal representation before a real Judge and jury.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 02:37 AM
17

And if you defend a guy against small dick jokes then they accuse you of having a small dick too! Then the “big dick energy” guys with ego problems jump in there to brag about their dick, and join the women in the small dick jokes, and the entire thing perpetuates.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 02:21 AM
5

Like the old lineup for hernia checks they used to do to young men for sports or military physicals. Even now there’s no medical privacy for men: drop your drawers in front of several medical personnel and a non professional female chaperone while standing, and let them all have a good look! That is NEVER done to women. How about a gown, and how about exposing only the parts that need viewing by the doctor, discreetly?
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:41 AM
2

Body shaming women is verboten in hospitals and clinics, but you betcha that men get ridiculed routinely by female medical staff. Heck they take pictures with their phones and share them.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:37 AM
2

Agreed!
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:35 AM
1

Studies of adult males circumcised as adults and who were sexually active prior to circumcision show no loss of subjective sensation. Find a different subject to complain about, of which there are PLENTY!
/r/MensRights24/11/21 01:21 AM
9

He forced them. It was forcible rape and not consensual sex.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 09:14 PM
1

Never using vroom. Added to the boycott list.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:10 PM
0

Um, pagan societies, which you named, treated women very poorly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/21 06:19 AM
6

No, I won’t sing it, but I will sign it!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 12:15 PM
2

Social media is enforcing conformist opinions. It was supposed to allow free expression. Odd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/21 01:19 AM
11

I love the crazy double standards that our society has created for so-called victim groups like “women”. Wtf is going on!? The judge was a female. Girl club.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 02:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter