TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MightyBlubb Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by MightyBlubb on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I watch it and I like it quite a bit. In my opinion the series isn't so much anti-male as it is very anti religious extremism and since it's playing in the Ex-USA it is a form of christian extremism, which, well, can be sexist, but is mainly oppressive in general. The series mostly shows the female side of life in an authoritarian religious state, and the worst of it at that, but that should be a given since the closely followed protagonist is the handmaid. However, the series does not depict a …
/r/MensRights22/05/18 12:28 PM
9

1 It nowhere says the victims are all female. 2 What happens to customers is not relevant information when it comes to female ->drivers<-. 3 The number of 32 is not put into a proper context -> it says >20% of all allegations, but it doesn't say how high a percentage of all taxi drives Uber provided at that point, which means we do not know whether that number is relatively high or low compared to the rest of the business. late edit: 4 Even if the number was about female drivers, it would still …
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:31 PM
2

I'm most certainly not alt-right and am subscribed, because I agree with enough of the stuff on here and I'm in favor of the topic in general. Your views will certainly not be unwelcome. As for the why, I think this article offers a well thought out possibility: http://quillette.com/2018/02/17/thinking-critically-social-justice/
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:15 AM
6

What I forgot to add (articles in german): It's also finally being adjusted Rape will soon be "penetration" - gender neutral (not just vaginal sex; not sure about oral though). Everything else will still be covered by Art. 189 (offences against sexual liberty and honour).
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:58 AM
11

There's no need to translate swiss laws yourself by the way. They are all available in english (top right corner on the gov's website): Art. 190 Swiss Criminal Code (Rape)
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:21 AM
1

Do you have a link to his discussion on state tv? I only know of this one. Just to make it clear (for others) what maenner.ch's views are: (The general topic is a picture of naked female politicians, which produced a bit of an (obviously predictable) "uproar" among some people - who cares..) Theunert (maenner.ch): "The new confidence of women is a huge provocation for all men who think women have to subordinate. They feel extremely provocated. Their reaction is an expression of intense insecurit…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:27 AM
10

I would simply say: No double standards. (Especially not when it comes to laws.) If you think men hitting women is wrong, don't accept it the other way around, or if you think women hitting men is ok, then accept the opposite too. (I prefer the former ;) ) If you think conscription/the draft is necessary don't exclude women or vice versa. Do women need shelters when they are the victims of domestic violence? Well then men should have the same if they are victims - or again the opposite, shelters…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:28 PM
22

Well there's not much to go on, whether her position has changed much or not. But even if not, if she's on the side of free speech and is willing to debate people, I'm all for it.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:23 PM
4

Reading your post, I can't help but think that you're close to falling off the cliff on the other side from where you were in the beginning. (This time on the TRP side) Don't make the same mistake male feminists do (that's not their only mistake obviously ;)) : You do not have to atone for the things others who have traits with you in common do. Also, there's no reason to view women in general as bad and even if "most" actually were "dishonest whores", those who aren't do not deserve to be place…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 06:10 AM
2

I think you should read the convention to make yourself a picture (- or see what Philip Davies has to say about it), because only then will you see the true dumpster fire it imo is... Some quotes: First, to understand what it means when the other articles talk about "the scope of the convention: Article 2 – Scope of the Convention "1 This Convention shall apply to all forms of violence against women, including domestic violence, which affects women disproportionately. 2 Parties are encouraged to…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:47 PM
1

I don't really know what to answer... Is there a reason why I should be bothered that it is a limit or...? Also there's no real point in actually engaging with the word "strange" itself, because my second comment should've made clear what the purpose of the word is (-> not be too insulting, while still transfering discontent).
/r/MensRights25/04/17 12:17 AM
2

Well I'd say e.g. /r/KotakuInAction It's the gamergate forum, so it's mainly about ethics in journalism, artistic freedom in games etc. -> that almost automatically means it's against SJW-culture, which it is. It's not in any way directly pro-MRA, simply because that's not the point there, but I'd say if such topics come up it's usually not unsympathetic. Which is not that much of a shock since gamergate is often misrepresented as sexist male gamers harassing poor females online.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:22 AM
2

Oh god what? I think "strange" is the kindest word for the whole piece.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 07:49 AM
2

While I find the spiritualistic commentary (chakra etc.) strange, I absolutely agree with the title and the overarching goal of legalizing sex work. However, I would choose a more down-to-earth approach. There are already relevant organisations with good positions, such as Amnesty International. For Europe there's also e.g. the ICRSE (International Committee on the Rights of Sex Workers in Europe) with its "Declaration of the Rights of Sex Workers in Europe" or "Sex Workers in Europe Manifesto" …
/r/MensRights24/04/17 01:35 AM
3

Yes, I would prefer that too. Although I'm labeling them too, so yeah... ;) (Saving grace: I use the label they give themselves)
/r/MensRights24/04/17 01:07 AM
8

Why do you think it's a problem to be labeled "mysogynistic MRA"? Sure I wouldn't like "mysogynistic" either, but well... You can't always control how someone labels you. So in turn it also doesn't always have to be up to you to change your message. If you have reason/facts/good arguments on your side, what more can you do? (well except fighting for a fair representation, but your content can't change much if the content is correct - obviously you should make sure you aren't actually wrong and l…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 12:55 AM
18

Well I've read stuff over there before. It's not all bad. But reading threads there feels like watching people who put shackles on themselves talking to each other about how they can make them a bit more comfortable - never questioning their existence or why someone wants them to wear them in the first place. This ends in the suppression of the people questioning the shackles entirely; hence their rules: "Constructive criticism of our community is fine, but if you’re mainly interested in critici…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 12:09 AM
8

Why exactly do you feel the need to make the same point over and over again? He obviously read your opinion the first and second time already and didn't agree with it.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 10:42 PM
1

Just to be clear, you won't prove anything you said to anyone on here - not even a picture of your verizon router? Can you tell some of the untruths that made you suspicious of your wife? Or let's start with this: Can you prove anything relevant like messages or how you know they are "on my home network and phones" etc. with hard evidence at least to yourself? Do you have physical evidence of anything that can't be easily interpreted differently by anyone (earnest) reading it? (Things like a dro…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 03:12 AM
1

I have a few questions before I can even begin to answer yours: There's billions of people on this planet, obviously there are plenty of instances of people of either gender being discriminatory / ignorant. How large does a problem need to be, to not just be counted as a large number of single instances but as a widespread problem? And do borders, contintents etc. matter or is it important to argue with all of humanity at once in mind? (+ Are the already dead part of those billions of people - i…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 05:35 PM
3

So Google is actually able to grasp reality - at least as long as they are the ones being accused. Now, if only they would apply the same criteria to everyone else and stop shitposting about the imaginary gender pay gap...
/r/MensRights12/04/17 12:36 PM
2

Could you link to the original article? Your link doesn't load for me. edit: ah now it works after all, thanks.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 03:04 PM
11

Have you read the study? Every statistic in there always says "rape and sexual assault" so the numbers are never rape alone (although the text is not as clear on that). Sexual assault hereby is defined as: "a wide range of victimizations, separate from rape or attempted rape. These crimes include attacks or attempted attacks generally involving unwanted sexual contact between a victim and offender. Sexual assault may or may not involve force and includes grabbing or fondling. Sexual assault also…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:07 PM
6

I'm pretty far left too (took the test some years ago, no changes though). Couldn't care less where feminists are located on the left/right spectrum - won't change where I am. The US essentially has a two-party-system which, I think, makes it easy to forget that you can measure a lot more than just left and right (well for now it would actually be choosing between right and even more right). For example a popular statistic in my country is the "smartspider" (example, not me ;)) which has a lot m…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 12:41 PM
5

I never had that bias either it seems. I always had a relatively strong sense of justice and also studied law for that reason - only to find that there are still things that actually disfavor men, like the draft or that (in my country) by law only women can get raped, while you'd be hard pressed to find any laws that disfavor women. I also love philosophy which makes hearing bs-logic unbearable ;) Anyways, I ended up interested in the atheist movement (online at least, since in europe it's mostl…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 10:45 AM
9

I agree with most posts so far, but I'd also like to add, that I don't necessarily understand why you would still feel guilt. If she hadn't attacked you all her problems would not be there. It was her action that got her in trouble, you only defended yourself and that in the (ethically) best way possible. Her logic is in reverse and you know it. And let's say you did talk to another woman - or you believe that her action is an acceptable reaction to her assumption - and that's why you feel guilt…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:19 PM
2

I brushed through the Report this morning. 1 Does anyone know what "similar work" as in "Wage equality between women and men for similar work (survey data, normalized on a 0-to-1 scale)" WEF Global Gender Gap Report 2016, p.4, means? I can't find a definition anywhere. I searched the PDF, I searched for the sources given (although they are not exactly online, since they are survey answers, the reports based on them are) etc. I must be blind. In the end, the only "definition" I could find was on …
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter