| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards.Then that's not the hypothetical I am discussing. I have said repeatedly, if he is forced into sex he is not guilty of rape and is likely being raped. The hypothetical I am discussing is one where a person willfully consents to have bondage/sex with a partner they know does not consent. Yes, consenting to bondage/sex, even if you're consenting to be immobilized, with a partner that does not consent can be rape. Bull... shit. He consented to sex once. That does not mean he consents to sex forever… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/13 04:28 AM |
| 1 | Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards.He is also a rapist. For the separate, completely unrelated reason: he agreed to have bondage sex with someone that does not consent. You are just fucking silly. The man did not engage in sex. The man was forced into sex. If you think a woman engaging in a sex act with an immobile man and then completing that act without ever trying to stop IS NOT CONSENTING, then you must have no idea what consent means. The fact that she initiated, carried out, and completed the act means she consented. Would … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/13 03:48 AM |
| 1 | Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards.If an adult puts up a craigslist ad hiring a home intruder to bind them, and then to force their partner to have sex with them against that partner's consent, surely they're guilty of rape. The rapist is the person who had sex with the partner against their consent. The person who placed the ad is guilty of conspiracy. And again, what a massive red herring. This is not even vaguely related to what we were discussing, which was a woman coming home from a bar and intentionally having sex with her … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/11/13 08:13 PM |
| 2 | Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards.The person who is immobile has no power. The person who initiates the act has all the power. Initiating the act and continuing it without making any effort to stop is consenting. Your position is that the immobile person is a rapist. That is fucking crazy. They have no power in this situation. None. Telling someone to stop is not having power. The person performing the sex act is the one with the power. They are not a victim. Passive rape is an incoherent concept. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/11/13 04:07 PM |
| 0 | Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards.You obviously do not know what a red herring is. Distracting from your original argument by introducing something irrelevant that tries to shift the discussion from a point you know makes no sense. That's a pretty damn big red herring. I claimed expressing non-consent could stop sex. You said a rapist would not stop, and I agreed, but said a non-rapist probably would stop. That's topical, not a red herring. It's not topical at all. You've been saying that the man was the rapist even if he could … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/11/13 03:55 PM |
| 0 | Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards.Your response is a nice red herring. You literally argued that the man is the rapist unless he tells the woman to stop. Your first paragraph says the opposite. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/11/13 02:49 PM |
| 2 | Rape, part 3. This is the question I was building towards.Most of us consider "expressing non-consent" as a power that can stop sex. So when a woman screams at her rapist to stop, he will? Or are you maybe ready to admit that this makes no sense? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/11/13 11:29 PM |
| -1 | [xMODx] Recent Drama, Reporting and Message to those linked here from viral campaignsYou really think those replies are from women, huh? | /r/seduction | 20/06/13 11:17 AM |
| 1 | A lot of guys in pick up need therapy, and not pick up.I think my categories still work. | /r/seduction | 13/11/12 12:04 AM |
| 6 | A lot of guys in pick up need therapy, and not pick up.Yes. That's called "being a normal human being." Except that most people typically don't just walk up to strangers and start talking - especially not like you know them. | /r/seduction | 12/11/12 05:42 AM |
| 5 | A lot of guys in pick up need therapy, and not pick up.Isn't the goal of seduction just to become a normal person who can approach women in public? No. A normal person can approach women in public without thinking of fucking them. | /r/seduction | 12/11/12 05:08 AM |
| 2 | A lot of trolls tonight ...Good point. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/12 09:12 PM |
| 7 | A lot of trolls tonight ...So... hoax. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/12 11:56 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter