| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What MGTOW gets wrong | MikeWill327 | /r/MGTOW | 22/04/19 07:03 AM | |
| 0 | What MGTOW gets wrong | MikeWill327 | /r/MGTOW | 22/04/19 07:24 AM | |
| 0 | My perspective on how MGTOW might be wrong | MikeWill327 | /r/MGTOW | 14/04/19 07:42 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What MGTOW gets wrongWhy worry about the facts from the responding argument when the original argument has no facts to support itself to begin with? | /r/MGTOW | 22/04/19 08:44 AM |
| 1 | What MGTOW gets wrongNo because this post is addressing the responses that were made from that first post, which claimed that hypergamy was a result of female nature and their biology. | /r/MGTOW | 22/04/19 08:18 AM |
| 1 | What MGTOW gets wrongdon't use words like psuedo science when your argument is based on 5th grade science. I guess you missed the part where I said "It could be argued with equal validity" | /r/MGTOW | 22/04/19 08:11 AM |
| 1 | What MGTOW gets wrongPropagation and sustainability of a species is super important and polygamy helps. This is when the number of living creatures in the species is significantly less than 7 billion. Polygamy as a species wide act is an act of sustainability and using that in the context of human beings may be deemed incorrect. This is the same context being used to support these claims of women being incapable of love. And if you think I didn't use enough facts, the original proposition has none, so no need to be … | /r/MGTOW | 22/04/19 07:55 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter