| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female teacher sentenced to 20 years in prison for having sex with a 13-year old studentThe violence is necessary for the rapist to overcome the physical expression of the victim not consenting. So it's more about lack of consent than violence. If it's without consent, regardless of violence, it is rape. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/04/20 09:50 PM |
| 1 | Well then...So why shouldn't they both have been expelled? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/04/20 09:37 PM |
| 3 | Amber Heard to be fired from Aquaman 2 and other Hollywood moviesWith her looks, she'd be a top tier hooker, so depending on your marketplace, you'd be looking at $500 to $1500 for a hummer. So between 33,334 and 100,000 BJs on this simple math. If a pimp is involved, she'd need to triple or quadruple that number to take home $50 million. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/04/20 09:24 PM |
| 1 | Bye Bye!All hail the Queen of Women of Walmart! | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/04/20 09:12 PM |
| 2 | Woman thinks she's above the law because she's a woman then cries like a child when reality hits herDid? Still is. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/04/20 08:59 PM |
| 5 | Sista gets the soul slapped out of her.....other women blame the man and demand an apology! HypocrisyIt does when you feed it Twinkies. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/04/20 08:43 PM |
| 11 | Sista gets the soul slapped out of her.....other women blame the man and demand an apology! HypocrisyOr becomes even stronger. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/04/20 08:32 PM |
| 4 | No matter what the situation might be, they never hesitate to play the victim cardI don't know if this is TMI or an LPT. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 30/04/20 08:29 PM |
| 1 | What feminism would stand for if they were for equalityYou're not trying to figure out my position. You're trying to convince me of yours. So stop with the pious altruism. If you were honestly trying to figure out my position, you wouldn't have grossly misrepresented it as you did in your last post. And the "my secret thoughts" defense doesn't work when you've typed said thoughts into the internet. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 03:03 PM |
| 1 | What feminism would stand for if they were for equalityI've not said they're ignorant. You have, though. I've not and never said it's the only way the message (writ generally) can be expressed. And I didn't say repetition is for the sake of acceptance. It said it was for the sake of desensitizing them from their abnormal emotional reaction to that particular use of that particular rhetorical device. Now you're just sewing together strawmen at this point. I've said what I've specifically said and nothing more. How can you reasonably expect me to main… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 05:38 AM |
| 0 | What feminism would stand for if they were for equalityJust because you can't see it doesn't mean it's not there. If the speaker believes the message is so bound up with the rhetorical device that re-drafting it without the device would not result in the same message, then when the speaker is asked to re-draft the message - which is what you are asking them to do - that is the kind of self-censorship that is rightfully rejected. You're way too wrapped up in the concept of not provoking one side's outrage machine. The outrage machine is a farce. It's… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 04:54 AM |
| 1 | What feminism would stand for if they were for equalityWhether someone is competent to express their message another way is irrelevant to whether having to do so in this instance is wrongfully imposed self-censorship. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 12:55 AM |
| 0 | What feminism would stand for if they were for equalityYou're wrong. If someone has to remove an otherwise acceptable literary device from their message because certain people in the audience would have an irrational reaction, that's wrongfully imposed self-censorship. How you express is not separate from what you express. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 12:28 AM |
| 0 | What feminism would stand for if they were for equalityNo. Not in the long term, if it comes at the cost of self-censorship to cater to their abnormal emotional reactivity. The message should just be repeated as is till those folks are desensitized to what they use to (irrationally) find offensive. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 12:16 AM |
| -1 | What feminism would stand for if they were for equalityMaybe, but maybe not. How can you predict something like that? | /r/MensRights | 19/02/17 11:11 PM |
| 9 | What feminism would stand for if they were for equalitySo a commonly accepted literary device shouldn't be used on this subject matter because why exactly? | /r/MensRights | 19/02/17 11:08 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter