TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mikhael_Varpole Archive

View 1 post and 14 comments by Mikhael_Varpole on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Mikhael_Varpole/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:57 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Perhaps - but regardless, I thought this sub would be interested to know the depths of Futrelle's dishonesty. Not that you doubt it - but here's some confirmation. And I would like to leave a written record of the truth.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:52 PM
-1

Excuse me if I was unclear - Futrelle didn't doxx me; however, he's knowingly framed me as a previously banned commenter and - without evidence; his lickspittles eat it up - used that weak pretense to ban my dissent. It's disgraceful. But and again, I say - I've come round to thinking that activism on the Internet is more trouble than it's worth. The bile - the ad hominem - the whisper campaigns and lies - and it's all talk. I'll be focusing my efforts upon the real world.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:37 PM
3

I will be engaging in "real-world" activism for the MRM; but I'm done with the online Movement. I strongly encourage others to do the same or at least consider the possibility; there is so much ad hominem online; dishonesty and whisper campaigns; Futrellian factotums looking to smear you; and little is accomplished.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:08 PM
3

I don't see Yishan explicitly supporting ShitRS; his response is bog-standard feministspeak; that is, likely what is expected of him in our feminist culture, as an important CEO. But I'll grant - ShitRS is significantly more extreme, more vile, and more misandrist, in my opinion, than simple feminism. They are literally a hate group. It's not the same thing as simply spouting feminist talking points.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:43 PM
33

It all comes down to a general contempt for men, especially men's sexuality; it's the purest form of misandry I can think of. Men's sexuality is garden variety; brutish; commonplace; they are the "peasants" of sex. Women's sexuality, on the other hand, is exotic, beautiful, "special". We see this dynamic played out in other areas of life as well - men's disposability being an obvious example - but nowhere is it more prominent then as to regarding sexuality.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:24 AM
1

All note - the feminist mangina David Futrelle has recently done a typically asinine post about this thread; I would prepare for a downvote brigade.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:21 AM
3

Vile. Thanks for the link. This is exactly when this subreddit is for. I very much hope this man gets some help; in our misandrist system, however, that is unlikely.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 09:17 PM
1

Frankly I would disagree with the assumptions underpinning the post; I see articles all over dissecting the most recent shooter's white maleness! Times they are "a changin'" as Woody Allen would say.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 09:14 PM
5

Phenomenal. Thank you, Whitemale18; a standout compilation. I might advise simply linking here whenever feminists and manginas snort derisively at female privilege.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 09:12 PM
3

Unfortunately, your friend isn't wrong, though he is misguided, of course. The SPLC exposé was a brutal "punch" and has resulted in much of the backlash; I believe it to be largely attributable to David Futrelle's dishonest rhetoric. I believe it will pass; perhaps the SPLC will see the error of their ways. Give it some years.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 11:59 PM
7

With all due respect, I must disagree; I think this is a very slippery slope - it's one area in which I will grant the feminists some legitimacy. No matter what, no one is ever "asking for it" - it's always 100% on the criminals - more specifically, the rapists. The fact that she invited two players to her room in no way entitles them to anything beyond going to her room. That being said, I am glad to see that the players are not being assumed guilty, as is the norm in rape accusations.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:31 PM
1

Yes - the ballooning of the term "rape" to encompass consensual drunken sex is one of many ways the feminists have proven themselves to be primarily interested in maintaining their own selfish victim complexes, as indeed, helping women as a group. It's vile in the extreme. In fact, "rape" as an entity, is the feminist "trump card" as it were. It's what they trade on. It's their lifeblood, or one of them; so when all indicators point to rape statistics trending downward, they have to invent new d…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:11 PM
12

Why are we even discussing vile individuals like Marcotte? It goes without saying that she wouldn't believe in the Movement - she's an amoral feminist who has made a career out of denying misandry and laughing and male pain. This is no surprise; she's just spelling out views that she's made clear through a career foundationally built upon hatred and incitement to hatred. It's disgusting; but it's the very manifestation of that which this subreddit fights. I don't want to see links to Marcotte he…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:57 PM
8

Disgusting. The only measure of comfort I can glean from the situation is that there exists the MRM to tabulate these crimes; ten years ago, we had not even that.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter