| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Violence is the end game for many feminists.She can deserve to be slapped back, but BOTH slaps are assault unless one is self defense. Retribution is not self defense. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/20 08:15 PM |
| 1 | Violence is the end game for many feminists.You misunderstand. I'm saying it's only self defense if SHE is still attacking him. And that single slap in response is still unwarranted unless in self defense. We're talking about a hypothetical here. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/20 08:05 PM |
| -3 | Violence is the end game for many feminists.If the situation is still tense? Listen, all I'm saying is that we don't know what happened in this situation. I'm pointing out that IF all that happened was a single slap with no more aggression, then hitting them is a second attack, not self defense. By all means, protect yourself when being attacked. But saying she deserved the retribution is not self defense. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/20 07:55 PM |
| -8 | Violence is the end game for many feminists.Right. So in this case, saying that was a deserved consequence is wrong. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/20 07:25 PM |
| -11 | Violence is the end game for many feminists.So wait. Was slapping her back self defense or was it retribution for being slapped in the first place? You can't just attack someone back because it's "fair". If he really was defending himself that's fine, but if the situation deescalated and then he slapped her, that is just another attack and not ok. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/20 07:11 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter