TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mindful-genius Archive

View 0 posts and 139 comments by Mindful-genius on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You go first.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 03:27 PM
1

Feminists will support any idiot who supports abortion. Hell, they would support Islam if Islam promoted abortion.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 01:20 PM
–

Ok, let’s kill all unwanted and unloved people. Let’s start with you….
/r/MensRights25/09/23 01:15 PM
19

Lefties spend all their time insulting and shaming their opponents. That’s because they have no real arguments.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:24 PM
1

Lefties are stupid people. It’s time to acknowledge that.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:23 PM
1

Religion precedes morality means that morality comes from, proceeds from, the idea of God. There is no right and wrong without God because you have to have an objective supreme judge for any statement of morality to make sense. It makes zero sense to say that YOU think a thing is immoral or I think a thing is immoral because we are not supreme judges. That is my point. Fucking hell so daft.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 02:52 AM
0

I’m only claiming one thing Einstein: morality is either objectively true or it’s only subjectively true. For it to be objectively true, there has to be God. If there is no God, then all morality is subjective and you may not, must not, can not claim that anything that you disapprove of is “wrong”. If there is no God, then no thing is morally wrong, it is only “something that you don’t like”.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:24 PM
1

That’s about the worst argument against God that I’ve ever heard. Congratulations. Care to explain how anything can be right or wrong in a world without God? Do tell…..
/r/MensRights24/09/23 07:28 PM
4

There are economic conservatives and social conservatives. Thus there are four main groups that do battle. Most feminists are both economic and social liberals. There are of course exceptions. MRAs are divided between socially liberal, socially conservative, and economic liberal and economic conservative (libertarian economics). Thus we don’t present a united front.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 04:13 PM
1

It’s all so beautiful, like a Disney movie. Holy shit. Maybe watch more nature movies on YouTube.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 03:58 PM
0

If there’s no God, then there’s no objective morality. If there’s no supreme Judge, then there are only opinions. It’s that simple.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:43 PM
1

Show me a hateful statement that I made. Show me. You’re the one who insulted me, not vice versa. You called me names ffs.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 01:04 AM
1

I don’t hate atheists. I said, now pay attention, that atheism qua atheism is not a moral code, it makes zero moral claims, and is not a basis for any moral code. See how details matter? You’re jumping to crazy conclusions. Holy cow pay attention.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 01:01 AM
1

I have hated nobody, I have said nothing hateful. You’re very emotional. I also did not claim what you believe. Do tell……
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:57 AM
1

Read the two accounts, there is no contradiction. The basic points are the same: God created the universe. You DO believe in the first law of thermodynamics? Matter and energy do not self-create, and most cosmologists believe that the universe had a beginning, a time zero. Deal with it. Free will is real, do you think yourself to be an automaton? If we don’t have free will, then you can’t blame people for being slave holders. You’re not too smart….
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:55 AM
1

The point is that you have no basis for declaring slavery wrong whatsoever. None! Only a moral code that exists in the mind of God can be a moral code to which we should give obeisance. Animals have no compunction about infanticide or rape or murder, but Man is not just an animal, and we have to live according to God’s laws. We are all hypocrites. You probably accept abortion. You’re on the wrong side of history if so, and in 100 years they will think of you as just as monstrously evil as slave …
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:53 AM
1

Lol. The so-called two creation stories are really not incompatible in any significant way. God gives us free will. If God knew that Hitler would do what he did, you blame God. Ok, so would you prefer having been made a robot? Or would you like to have free will…..
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:39 AM
1

A). You don’t know how many slaveholders were Christians. It was Christians who forcibly abolished the practice world wide. That’s a fact. It was not any other group. It is still practiced in the Middle East and the far east. B). Christianity preaches “do unto others”. Please tell me any ideology that literally tells its adherents that “whatsoever they do to others, they do unto God Himself”, and for which they will be held responsible. That’s a bracing thing to believe in. C). Atheism is compat…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:37 AM
1

God did not invent sin, you did.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:28 AM
1

You read a history book or two. Christians abolished slavery. Period, dot. “On 22 December 1741, Pope Benedict XIV promulgated the papal bull "Immensa Pastorum Principis" against the enslavement of the indigenous peoples of the Americas and other countries. Pope Gregory XVI in his bull In supremo apostolatus (issued in 1839) also condemned slavery as contrary to human dignity.” That there were people who called themselves Christians who owned slaves only proves that hypocrites exist. Where does …
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:18 AM
1

The Bible has lots of books with various genres of writings. Some are history, some are laws, some are stories the nature of which are possible true or allegories, some are fables. The New Testament is the four gospels which are historical accounts, letters by St. Paul and Peter and John, history of the acts of the apostles, and an abstruse writing called “Revelation”. You really haven’t learned much but you do have strong opinions based on very little. That’s not a good way to go through life, …
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:15 AM
1

A). I don’t believe that there was an ark that held all the animals, that makes no sense. There likely was a flood, and there likely was a man named Noah who made a boat, and he survived the flood. Beyond that I don’t know and don’t care. Not all Bible stories are literally and totally true, they are stories that the Jewish people kept from their past and that taught lessons. B). I believe in evolution, properly defined as the change in the genetic makeup of a population over time, and limited f…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:29 PM
1

Um, slavery in Great Britain and America were stopped by force by Christians. Look up William Wilberforce. Slavery is still practiced in non Christian lands to this day. Christianity preaches “do unto others”. What does atheism preach? Oh yeah, nothing.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:13 PM
1

No, that is false. Jesus corrected many of the misconceptions that the Israelites had about God the Father, and he corrected those misconceptions. You don’t know the texts at all; they are nothing like the Quran.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:11 PM
1

I already agreed that you can be moral workout believing in God. You’re beating a dead horse. My point is that there is no objective morality unless there is an objective mind by which to judge morality. Your mind and my mind are just opinions. God’s opinion in the only one that can create an objective morality. If there is no God, there is no right or wrong, there is just animals being animals. Some are violent, some are peaceful, none are good or bad morally speaking.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:46 PM
1

Some people don’t give a damn about morality, and my point is the the existence of God makes them objectively wrong in His eyes. They will reap their reward, not as a punishment and not as an incentive to be good, but because they CHOSE it, and because God IS. I’m arguing for an objective morality, like saying that gravity exists. Gravity is a fact. Morality is a fact, but it can only exist as a fact if God exists as a fact; anything else would just be the opinions of advanced chimps, and opinio…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:37 PM
1

You’re using the Old Testament and not the new by which to judge Christianity. That’s your first mistake. Your second is to assume that I am saying that nobody can be moral except under threat. I said no such thing. What I said, was, is that things are objectively right or wrong, independent or your opinion or mine, and that objective opinion is the Supreme Judge, God.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:29 PM
1

If we are ontologically equal to animals, we may behave as animals. No thanks. You have no basis for telling me what is right or wrong. None. It’s just your opinion. But if God exists, it’s His opinion . Big difference. It’s like the law: you might not like the law, but the law is what a judge says that it is.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:06 PM
0

Say what you will, but history has shown that atheistic communism has killed more people than any other ideology in history. And pagans who did not believe in religions as we understand them did human sacrifice routinely. You’re swimming in a sea of Christian sensibilities which you now take for granted. Not everybody believes in “do unto others as you would have done unto you”. You’re benefiting from the cultural changes and moral sensibilities brought by Christianity into the world.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:04 PM
2

Talk about taking a quote out of context. A sword divides. The point of the text is that Jesus came to divide the righteous from the unrighteous. No violence was ever committed by his apostles. Christianity does not allow for aggressive violence, it only allows for defensive wars. You’re either intentionally lying or very misinformed.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 08:55 PM
1

You are against the (supposed) morality of the Old Testament? That’s probably because you imbibed the morality of the New Testament. Good for you.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 06:59 PM
2

Are morals relative then?
/r/MensRights23/09/23 06:56 PM
0

I don’t think that dolphins raping their females is based on a moral standard, it’s just instinctual behavior. Same with chimps. Are we chimps? Why not? Maybe we have souls. Wow, what a concept.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 06:55 PM
1

The pagan world was a disaster. Roman Empire anybody? Druids? Aztec human sacrifices? Mayan death cult? German barbarian hordes? Vikings raping and pillaging? Communist genocides? No thanks, I’ll take a world that has imbibed Christian sensibilities over many many centuries. You swim in a sea of Christian sensibilities but you’ll never recognize the water. Of course nominal Christians have done all kinds of horrible, but the creed itself sets the standards, and by their standards, they failed. P…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 06:54 PM
1

All religions are not equal. Pagans had their human sacrifices, and when that practice was stopped through violence, your side cried foul.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 04:08 PM
-3

Animals are not very good to each other, sorry. They might have a social pecking order, but that’s about it. Rape and pillage and infanticide are routine. When Man acts as an animal, it’s not pretty. The reason he does not is the belief that he ought not die to there being a specialness to mankind that does not exist in the animal world. If you wish to act like a chimp, be my guest. There is no reason not to if you really believe that Man is ontologically equal to chimps.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 04:07 PM
0

False. Religion precedes morality. I agree that anyone can behave morally without religion, due to Natural Law written on the heart. But there is no logical or compelling reason that a being who is nothing but an advanced chimp, with no soul , SHOULD act in any manner whatsoever, he may do as he wants since the ontological essence of Man is assumed to be equal to that of a chimp. Nobody tells chimps not to rape and commit infanticide, why not?
/r/MensRights23/09/23 02:46 PM
3

Sounds good. Now why don’t chimps be excellent to each other? And who says that we should, you?! Who are you to tell Genghis Khan that rape and pillage are wrong? Chimps gotta chimp. “Without God, all things are permissible”. Ivan Karamazov
/r/MensRights23/09/23 02:41 PM
-4

“Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor” is the eighth commandment, and a very good one at that. Twould be nice if mankind had an interest in “religion”, I know that’s scary to some of you, but maybe, just maybe, could be true, that some things are morally WRONG, and that “do unto others” is already good rule of thumb for how to behave. Wedded to the idea that you will be responsible for your sins, that’s maybe, just maybe, a prescription for improving the world. But NO, some of …
/r/MensRights23/09/23 02:13 PM
6

That idiot just wants to ingratiate himself with women so he can finally get laid, which he has so far been unable to achieve because he looks like an ape.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 09:54 PM
1

They gotta ruin every young woman who succeeds by turning her into a feminist poster child.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 05:25 PM
39

Lizzo was accused of “making” her employee dancers commit crazy sexual acts. I can’t remember the details. As far as that goes, I’m not aware of the details of what Brand is actually accused of. What EXACTLY is he accused of doing?
/r/MensRights21/09/23 10:36 PM
3

The video is disturbing as hell. I don’t see this as a men’s rights issue though. It’s a crime issue, and we have the Democrats to blame for this fucked up bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:42 PM
4

Male modesty in healthcare settings is not even a thing. Women are protected.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 05:48 PM
0

They’re crazy that’s what.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:37 PM
1

Why the hell would women laugh at that? How the hell would anybody change women all across America so that they would have the basic human decency to find that to be reprehensible?
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:44 AM
2

Nonsense. The Left is a bunch of feminist, man-hating Marxists.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 10:38 PM
9

So they beat on men for 40 years and now they wonder why fewer men go to college. Liberals really are stupid people.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 10:19 PM
2

Kids need to get on a career path and much faster than we do it now. It takes til age 32-36 to become and MD in many specialties. That’s ridiculous. To be a physical therapist now requires a PhD, that’s also ridiculous. An undergraduate degree in anthropology or sociology will get you a job with Uber, that’s ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 11:47 AM
0

Sociological studies are garbage. The very questions asked by a study show an inherent bias, generally creating a self-fulfilling result that the “researcher” is seeking to confirm. What am I talking about? Let’s say, for example, that you think that there’s a question of whether adopted children feel less a part of their adopting family than biological children feel. The very question demonstrates a bias that such a phenomenon could be true. It’s unlikely that obtaining objective results would …
/r/MensRights31/08/23 01:31 PM
11

Governments spend a ton of tax dollars to support expensive and often worthless “higher education”. Those dollars spent led to massive inflation in costs to obtain a college degree. Many such college degrees are in fields that have no marketable skill set except in the sphere of “higher education”. So we pump out more master’s degrees and PhDs to support the educational industrial complex which keeps feeding at the taxpayer trough, while men who prefer to “fix stuff that needs fixin’” get screwe…
/r/MensRights31/08/23 12:00 PM
2

You must be British. In America we say “math” and “addition” and “logic”. The plural sounds strange to our ears.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 02:13 PM
1

Start at? My aggregate taxes were well over 30%. Yours may be different. However, if you look at all the taxes that you pay, I wouldn’t be surprised that you pay over 30% of your income in taxes.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 06:23 PM
7

Wait, I’m on chapter 191818 and it’s the same. Do you suppose this could go on into infinity? I’m tired of the same chapter and verse and I wanna get to the good part.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 03:09 PM
9

Start at? My aggregate taxes were well over 30%. Yours may be different. However, if you look at all the taxes that you pay, I wouldn’t be surprised that you pay over 30% of your income in taxes.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 01:59 PM
8

Revolutions almost always devolve into tyranny in the end. I don’t trust “democracy” any more than I trust an aristocracy. At this point, I’d take King George over the modern iteration of American government, at least King George only wanted a 10% tax on tea; our democracy (actually a representative republic) takes 30-50% of a man’s income.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 12:33 PM
0

Victimhood culture gotta create oppressors and victims. Life is a morality play. The current currency of moral rectitude is victimhood.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 12:25 PM
5

What you call “misandry” from trad cons is what I call “expectations on men to live up to if we want a decent society with intact families”.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:54 PM
5

College? “Aggressive” is misspelled.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:57 AM
12

You should go to feminist sites then and report back. An honest assessment would cause you to delete this post immediately.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:20 AM
12

Patients misinterpreting or misunderstanding what their doctor told them?! Nah, never happens…/sarcasm to the power of infinity.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:49 PM
21

If I never hear about menstruation in public discourse ever again, I won’t be upset.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 07:04 PM
11

MRI is the “best” tool for screening for prostate and breast cancer, problem has been the expense and time involved. If it can be made quick and cheap, it could replace DRE and PSA, and also mammograms, maybe…..
/r/MensRights22/08/23 12:25 PM
22

Difference: Lizzo demands that we celebrate her body, the media agrees with her, reeves likely doesn’t give af what you or I think, he doesn’t discuss it, and nobody in the media or Hollywood demands we “celebrate” it.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 09:33 PM
1

A). I’m not sure that chess is a proxy for “intelligence”. B). I merely reported what I’ve read about population IQ tests. Whether such tests measure whatever is meant by “intelligence” is another matter altogether. C). I don’t know why the Chess World thinks that women can’t compete with men. Men can’t compete with computers. D). In the final analysis, high IQ only correlates partially with “success” or invention or productivity in the sciences. Differences between and among people at the highe…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 07:40 PM
1

Care to prove that? IQ tests reportedly skew toward more extremes for men, tighter distributions for women.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 12:20 AM
1

The template that idiotic evolutionary psychologists apply to human behavior based on that of chimps [“our closest relatives!!] is absolute crap. I have even closer relatives whose behaviors I would not wish to emulate or to be compared with, as though I had no free will or intelligence to behave quite differently.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 11:40 PM
–

Hatred? Wow. Maybe see a therapist about your paranoia.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:48 PM
1

Um, er, feminists play the Victim Card in western societies all day long, that’s what.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:39 PM
1

The question is why feminism is needed in western society when women have already won more than equal rights in western civilizations. The question is not about how women are treated in other places where feminism doesn’t exist. Why don’t western feminists come to the aid of oppressed women in Muslim countries, for example?? It’s because western feminists only care about themselves, and because they fear Muslim reprisals but don’t fear reprisals in western countries where they are quite NOT Oppr…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:27 PM
0

And most women have not been abused or raped or mistreated in any significant way.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:21 PM
1

Wtf are you going on about? They are having Michael Brown celebrations for three days in ferguson MO. The guy strong-armed some Indian dude at a store, stole cigars, and had the cops called on him. He attacked the cop, grabbed his gun, and nearly shot the cop. Michael was shot dead by the cop in self-defense. End of story. Now why the fuck is he a hero?! Women are getting all the professional positions, they aren’t going to Black men, that’s for fucking sure. If you wanna cheer on feminists, be …
/r/MensRights11/08/23 08:37 PM
14

And you either don’t know what happened that day, or are yourself a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:26 AM
14

Wow. This is crazy.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:00 AM
20

And anti-heroes are being feted as heroes. Michael Brown ceremonies are going on for three days to celebrate that street thug’s death. It’s ridiculous. Up is down and right is left.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:06 PM
70

This is why somebody’s kid is gonna die one day, lost on the street while on a vacation, and some male adult will just whistle on past the child so as not to be accused of kidnapping the child, and the kid will end up dead or worse. Heaven knows that if you play the hero, you’re gonna be a suspect. People have done nothing to help victims of rape while on public buses in NYC! Men are just saying no to wearing capes. MGTOW.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 09:21 PM
5

Double standards abound. It’s tiresome.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 12:28 PM
4

A very little corner of the internet let’s hope.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:42 PM
33

“Taken the internet by storm”. Hyperbole much?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:27 PM
-1

Live by the sword, die by the sword.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 11:13 PM
1

You sure have swallowed all the usual liberal shibboleths. I don’t believe a word of it.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:55 PM
1

Men might think that in some areas women are inferior to men, and women might think that men in some areas are inferior to women. That could be true. That’s life.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:13 PM
1

And almost every culture in history (pigmented or less pigmented) has had slaves and fought wars of aggression. So your point is what exactly?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:09 PM
3

The fact is that Americans and Great Britain outlawed slavery, and fought wars to stop it; your ignorance notwithstanding. Slavery still exists in much of the world, and it is not “White” people doing it. Read some Thomas Sowell, he is very Not White, and quite your intellectual superior.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:31 PM
4

Why are you asking me that stupid question? The Irish were slaves. Slavic peoples were slaves. Every race has been somebody’s slave. “Whites” are the only group to physically stop slavery and make it illegal. That’s a fact.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:22 PM
6

Seriously? You should know that slavery was done by all races at all times and that skin pigmentation had nothing to do with it except by historical accident in America.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:10 PM
4

Anybody who uses the incel insult is probably projecting. That dude on YouTube is “sexually active” only because his hand works just fine.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:05 PM
1

She said nothing intelligible.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:27 AM
63

But it didn’t make fun of women, so no comparison.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 12:55 AM
1

That’s crazy. It can’t be true in America.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:39 PM
10

Wait. A third of men can’t have a conviction of anything let alone a crime!
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:41 PM
5

Inherent risk is inherent risk, you can’t make jobs perfectly safe no matter how much you try. Ever look at MV accidents? Yeah, why do 40,000 ppl die on our roadways every year, is it usually the car manufacturer’s fault? Dangerous jobs are held by men, that’s just a fact, and your interest in making them “less dangerous” is lovely, but unlikely to contribute to safety.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:43 PM
7

OSHA already has plenty of stupid and excessive regulations that make no sense. Half of workplace accidents are based on ppl doing stupid shit and not following safety protocols. Some jobs are dangerous and nothing more can be said.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:13 PM
23

Women use superlatives when they mean “most” or “generally”. My wife will say “you always” do such and such, or “I never” do this and so, when she really means “often” or “rarely”, respectively. That’s why girls ruined the word “literally” to mean “figuratively”. Women can’t do nuance.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:55 PM
2

You’re a very rare bird. Of the four options, I’d say that yours is the least populous. Just curious, how do you square social conservatism with forced redistribution of income? I’m for the nuclear family having financial autonomy so that parents can earn money, take care of their families, and save for their families. Charity of course comes from their ability to save and accumulate wealth. Jesus used benefactors who had money to help him; his parables about generosity being expected of us all …
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:42 PM
1

Not hardly. And if Keynes was not a socialist, Marx wasn’t a communist. All things need interpretation, interpret wisely. https://peri.umass.edu/economists/james-crotty/item/1179-keynes-against-capitalism-his-economic-case-for-social-liberalism
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:59 PM
5

This is genius! I never thought about it.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:47 PM
4

Trump employs thousands of ppl. Obama raised the debt more than all other presidents before him combined! What do you think Biden’s spending has done? This economy sucks. Trump’s economy was gang busters.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:40 AM
1

“Ain’t” is a colloquialism used tongue in cheek. Socialism erodes the purchasing power of currencies since that stupid idea of Keynes caused governments to spend money they don’t have to fund their schemes. Inflation of even 3% compounded is a killer to middle and lower class.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:35 AM
0

Socialism is not unique or helpful.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:19 AM
-13

“You’re”. What a pathetic person you are. (The guy edited his post and corrected his misspelling of “you’re” from “your” after I corrected him. Socialists generally want big government to wipe their asses for them. Free stuff! Yippee!).
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:58 AM
2

So you’re liberal. Bernie is a socialist who never worked a damned job in his life. Obama is now worth 100 million dollars, as is AlGore and the Clintons and the Pelosis and the Bidens, all socialists who never fucking worked in the real world but only in government, taxing the fuck outa me. May they go to hell.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:24 AM
-15

If you ain’t liberal or conservative then you’re just confused. Liberals are loathsome creatures.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:17 AM
2

It’s a stupid phrase, but let’s be honest, most of us wanna look at women, and could do so all day. It’s a moral question; Jesus said don’t do it, so I try not to. But obviously he wouldn’t have said that if it were not a natural inclination. Feminists are not by and large Christians, so if they wanna tell me not to gaze, my question is why not? Who are they to impose their morality on me? (Just doing a reverse uno card on their stupid phrase condemning all impositions of morality).
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:49 AM
2

Poor husband.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 11:57 AM
12

Totally true. Dads are glorified ATMs, even if you wanna be involved in your kids’ lives and you give as much advice and help as you can beyond just money. It’s weird, you can’t win.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 09:32 PM
2

But you’re a tabula rasa and we can write whatever want to on your brain and you will believe it.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 09:29 PM
21

I would tell them to go to hell.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 12:54 AM
1

You have the IQ of a dog. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:06 AM
1

Make a point.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:01 AM
1

You can’t spell. You can’t write. Maybe get your high school diploma then come discuss.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:59 AM
1

I’m not a girl, I won’t adjust the seat for them, and you have a strange reaction to that decision. Why does it matter?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:57 AM
1

Um, I’m arguing against having to adjust the seat for women. I am male, I do have a rather large finished basement, but I don’t dwell there, I prefer to stay upstairs most of the time. I don’t sniff asses, mostly because I never thought about doing so, and I don’t see the benefit to me or the recipient.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:46 AM
0

Weight loss (bariatric) vs old people (geriatric).
/r/MensRights27/07/23 06:21 PM
11

Your apologies are proof enough that you have drank/drunk/drinken (what’s the word anyway?) the KoolAid too.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 03:53 PM
6

Ok, and I can give an example of women abusing their husbands, does it prove that women are more abusive to husbands than men are to wives? What does a single anecdote prove?? Nothing!
/r/MensRights27/07/23 10:24 AM
11

Bariatric surgery not geriatric surgery lol.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:12 AM
4

You just made the stupidest straw man argument ever. Evolution has nothing to do with this discussion and there is zero comparison that you made that makes any sense at all.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:10 AM
8

Um, yeah, and it happens in reverse too, so what’s your point? You made no point at all.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:09 AM
7

I refuse to accommodate people who want special privileges unearned.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:36 PM
2

I’ve read five reviews and they all say the same thing. My daughter’s bf saw it and said yeah it’s misandrist nonsense. So no, I’m not going to see it. That’s how movies work: you see what you wanna see based on reviews and reports. I’ve certainly seen movies without hearing reports, and generally have been disappointed. So your point that you didn’t make but are going to make to me is crap, i don’t have to see the fucker to hate the fucker.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:24 AM
20

My daughter is seeing it for the third time. She’s 19 and loves the movie. I tried to tell her all of this but she refused to listen.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:51 AM
1

I just read about myelination of the human brain in a science publication, and I swear that they bent over backwards to downplay differences between male and female brains. It read very politically correct; they wound say things like some studies show male brains to be bigger on average, but other studies don’t show that, and the differences are not statistically significant. There were several times when they bent over backward to down play found differences. It’s irritating because science sho…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:10 AM
3

As I understand autism, it’s a genetic disorder. Yes? No? Is there a male predilection based on genetics or hormones?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:00 PM
1

I can’t read it because Microsoft wants me to download the app and they can go make unnatural love to Bill Gates before I will do that.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:33 PM
3

They don’t belong in the military where the standards are lowered for them. They don’t belong on police forces or fire fighting or other physically demanding jobs that they can’t meet male standards for.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:30 PM
1

VAMC should be privatized. Give the vets private health insurance.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 01:31 AM
5

Yeah, no shit Sherlock.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 07:42 PM
5

I shit in toilets. I don’t shit on human beings.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 06:35 PM
3

Huh? I didn’t compare anything at all. Cat calling is bad and stupid.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:51 PM
9

So women can desire to be “objectified”, and men have to go along with each individual woman’s choice as to whether she wants to be objectified or not? This is just like the whole trans gender argument, the idea that each person gets to decide how OTHERS view them and think about them. I don’t agree. If a woman wears tight leggings, for example, and flashes camel toe, she doesn’t get to control my sexual THOUGHTS that I have about her. That’s objectionable to me. I agree that “cat calling” is ri…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:06 PM
33

And yet it’s “empowering” for women to sell their bodies on OnlyFans or to be sex workers. Feminists can’t decide if they wanna be sexualized or not. So they demand both. Typical split brain nonsense from women. Wives do this to their husbands sometimes: “don’t you find me sexy? I want you to find me to be sexy”. Vs “you just want me for sex”. They use both arguments against their husbands in different circumstances. We can’t win.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 12:35 PM
1

Use FBI stats.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 11:24 AM
1

You said white men. That’s a caveat that isn’t true.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 05:48 PM
1

“Male and female he created them”. That’s why, they hate the anthropology of both the OT and the NT.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:54 PM
1

Trad values keep men down? It’s the Left that screwed men over the most. IDC if you don’t like traditional male roles and responsibilities, I really don’t. But don’t blame real men for the feminist onslaught on real men.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:52 PM
1

Wait….what does that mean “White men commit most crimes?” On a per capita basis, White men are not over represented in crime stats, they are at most equally represented, or LESS represented.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:46 AM
5

Dads get treated terribly. Some ask for it, but in general, kids don’t care about or respect dads these days, no matter how good they are.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:30 AM
1

Amen! Let them suffer under the rules they made for society. I say let’s make everything an equal playing field, and let the chips fall where they may. Does anybody seriously believe that women will have equal sports outcomes, or equal ability to be firemen or policemen or soldiers? This insanity is of their making. They invaded male spaces and dismantled them, now it’s our turn to dismantle their spaces.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 09:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter