MindoverMuddle Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
270	“Misogyny kills. Misandry just hurts feelings.”	Edu./Occu.	MindoverMuddle	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 12:50 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	“No man is single by choice.” I wouldn't call hitting the wall with no other options, leaving you with no choice but to be single "being single by choice" the reason you are, is literally because of circumstances you could, though didnt change, leaving you no choice but to remain single, thats no choice. They call it “single by choice” the same way someone living in a tent says they’re “embracing minimalism.” It’s a cope to avoid admitting they priced themselves out of the market they helped destroy.	/r/EverydayMisandry	07/11/25 03:51 AM
8	I have never witnessed this level of hatred So, what exactly did she accomplish? By harming herself like that, it doesn’t even affect men like she thinks it does. These people think that they’re hurting us by doing this when they are just hurting themselves. Literally, she pricked her skin with over a hundred needles, with an ink press, risking the chance of getting cancer, just to engrave her prejudice for men on her body, and she somehow thinks it affects us? The rest of our lives carry on as usual, whilst they’ll remain with so much ha…	/r/EverydayMisandry	27/10/25 04:51 PM
2	Wish I Could Show the Username Thank you for your kind words. I think my grammar is average, to be honest, when looking at it, i wouldn't proclaim that it's in any way on par with, nor on a similar calibre to, highly sophisticated linguists. What you think you should sound like in your head is what i sound like in mine it seems. The key is to have composure and analyse your vocabulary, so I think that would be a note to take in, you have to be calm, grasp, and understand what terminologies you'd like to use, then see if they …	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/09/25 10:34 AM
30	Wish I Could Show the Username This is a textbook definition of identity based guilt manipulation. They take the heinous acts of a minority of men, then attempt to smear the entire male population with it, erasing individuality, morality, and personal accountability in favor of a crude collectivist blame game. That’s not justice, that’s scapegoating. It’s the same logic racists, sexists, and every hate group in history have used: “You look like the offender, so you’re guilty too.” It’s lazy, it’s illogical, and it’s immoral. …	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/09/25 01:20 AM
5	Andrea Dworkin Is the Last Person Who Should Be Taken Seriously One rape case in France, one perverted chatroom in Korea, one judge in Belgium = suddenly "misogyny culture" worldwide. That’s not an argument, that’s cherrypicking extreme outliers and pretending they’re the rule. If this logic were consistent, every female teacher sleeping with her students would be “rape culture of women abusing boys.” But you won't and don’t apply the same standard because it exposes your bias. Every crime you listed, has an actual cause, psychopathy, perversion, corruption,…	/r/EverydayMisandry	28/08/25 04:03 PM
17	Andrea Dworkin Is the Last Person Who Should Be Taken Seriously What misogyny culture? Mysogyny is heavily and utterly condemed, reality literally contradicts this false victim notion thats trying to be spread here. If there was even an ounce of truness to What's being said here, many on tiktok would receive high followings, for making misogynistic remarks, a violation of tiktoks community guidelines and community service, it wouldn't be a bannable offence, try it on any social media app, even here on Reddit, make a post with slight misogynistic implications…	/r/EverydayMisandry	25/08/25 09:32 AM
19	No wonder why men are choosing to be single. ALSO, THE UPVOTES. Take lesbian relationships, they have the highest rates of domestic violence out of all orientations. Higher than heterosexual couples, and higher than male-male couples. That alone demolishes the idea that men are inherently the problem. Abuse stems from mindset and behavior, not gender. Identity only tells you who commits more abuse statistically, it doesn’t cause it. If gender alone were the cause, all men, including you and me, would have to be abusers for their claim to hold, and that is pr…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/08/25 09:24 PM
2	“Misogyny kills. Misandry just hurts feelings.” Why does it bother you that women are afraid of men? Because you’re generalizing an entire population based on the actions of a tiny subset, which is the literal definition of prejudice. If we applied your logic to mothers (since they commit the majority of infant homicides), then society would have to see all mothers as a danger to babies. You’d call that sexist and inhumane, but that’s exactly what you’re doing with men. You claim women are more likely to be killed in car accidents because cra…	/r/MensRights	08/08/25 07:08 PM
1	“Misogyny kills. Misandry just hurts feelings.” It’s fine to stereotype all men as inherently unsafe… but don’t you dare apply the same logic to women, minorities, or any other protected group, because then it’s discrimination. Your hypocrisy is textbook Take a small minority of bad actors in a group e.g., violent men. Apply their crimes to the entire group. Justify it under “precaution” while pretending it’s not prejudice. Cry foul when anyone applies the same reasoning back at you. if i applied your logic to infanticide, we’d have to say “A…	/r/MensRights	08/08/25 05:39 PM
4	“Misogyny kills. Misandry just hurts feelings.” Exactly Femicide laws, make the killing of women a “special” crime while male homicides get no equivalent category its a masterclass There’s no record of misandrist based male homicides, not because they don’t happen, but because the system refuses to document them. This is straight-up erasure, driven by the same gynocentric double standard. Countries like Mexico, Argentina, and Spain have specific femicide laws, categorizing murders of women due to their gender as a distinct crime with harsher …	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 06:29 PM
3	“Misogyny kills. Misandry just hurts feelings.” "Women kill more men than other women. Men kill more men than women. The stats don’t support the statement” Is a textbook dodge, twisting the conversation to avoid the real issue. I'm not arguing about who kills who more, i'm exposing how misandry gets downplayed while misogyny gets amplified, even when both can escalate from statements to violence. Your logic is like saying, “Only the majority matters,” which is insane. I'm calling for equal accountability. Not denying that men can be perpetrat…	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 04:26 PM
10	“Misogyny kills. Misandry just hurts feelings.” Classic rhetorical laundering here, take a very specific issue (targeted hate and systemic dismissal of men), throw it into a generic blender of “human dignity” and “all forms of hate,” and voilà! Now the uniqueness of male suffering disappears, and suddenly, calling it out becomes “divisive.” That’s not how accountability or change works. You should call it out sharply when it’s asymmetric hate masked as virtue. The polite softening of language is a weapon used to diffuse moral outrage, which i…	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 03:06 PM
52	“Misogyny kills. Misandry just hurts feelings.” Aileen Wuornos didn’t kill men because she tripped and fell on a gun. She killed them because she had internalized hatred and personal trauma, which morphed into misandry, which became justification, which led to murder. Lorena Bobbitt didn’t become a symbol of “female rage” by accident. She acted on an attitude of contempt, reinforced by a culture that allowed her to be celebrated instead of institutionalized.	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 01:22 PM
10	Various Bad Takes from a Page For the first one. “Cooking, sewing, or taking care of a baby aren’t feminine tasks.” Yes, they absolutely are biologically, evolutionarily, and historically associated with the feminine role—for damn good reason. Women’s bodies literally prepare for pregnancy, childbirth, and postnatal care. Lactation, mammary glands, body fat composition for childbearing, etc. are exclusive to females. Evolution didn’t give women breasts just for nothing, they serve crucial purpose. They exist to feed the baby…	/r/EverydayMisandry	31/07/25 09:22 AM
30	Typical Shit Take from Kylie Brewer Reverse the roles, how unhinged, misogynistic, abusive, and utterly condemned it would be if the roles were reversed and a guy was generalizing all women based on a few bad ones. It's not the identity; it's not gender that makes the person a catalyst for harm, it's the individual and their mind! Again, these same fools can't at all separate individualism from identity. They just collectively hate and generalize based on similarities in biological traits, in this case, gender—the same identity-ba…	/r/EverydayMisandry	20/07/25 02:06 AM
27	Misandry isn't real.. This is exactly how Nazis treated the Jews, this identity based hate is nothing new, we've seen it time and time and time again, it's the exact same discriminatory crap that nazis used, that racists use, that genocidal people use aswell, it's on that exact same calibre, these people are just as worse as all the same hateful people that they condemn and they don't even see it, same thing, just a change in the identity demographic. It's disturbing how some justify this behavior under the guise of …	/r/EverydayMisandry	15/07/25 10:02 PM
16	Classic Being hysterical to discriminatory realities doesn't make them go away, simply because the victim spotlight isn't on your side and is, in fact, pointing out your side. Being at fault, you want to ommitt it, which is misandrist itself. Countries like England still have rape laws that only apply to women and not men, defined exclusively as 'someone putting their penis in another person's vagina, anus, or mouth without the person's permission,' completely making it legal for women to rape men and b…	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/06/25 05:19 PM
3	They only bring up male victims to concern troll and throw shade at Men's Advocates First off—the “men should be grateful they got raped by a woman” mindset? That's not just tone-deaf—it’s psychopathic. That’s the equivalent of telling a woman she should thank a guy for raping her because he found her attractive. Everyone would (rightfully) lose their minds over that. But when it’s a man? Suddenly, it's a joke. Suddenly it’s “free sex.” These people are not quoting real men. They're inventing strawmen to justify their hate. It’s like watching a chick argue with a guy in her hea…	/r/EverydayMisandry	11/04/25 02:13 PM
15	Men are sexual harassers and should worship women: Men already do all of that, if not more, the real question is, why should we even be offering all this to people like this who hate us and want to exploit us, that's all this is. Cast them aside. Don't do this for misandrists like this; they want to exploit the benefits, which is why they sound like this. It's like the abusive mom who love-bombs her child, calling him "sweety" to psychologically trigger that emotional affection, making it seem like she loves and appreciates him. But in reality, …	/r/EverydayMisandry	14/03/25 07:49 PM
11	"Misogyny kills, misandry doesn't" Their logic completely falls apart when you apply it evenly. If misogyny is more than just physical violence—if it includes discrimination, mockery, and systemic issues—then misandry does too. But they don’t want that. They need to gatekeep oppression so that only women can claim victimhood. The idea that "misandry doesn’t kill" is outright false. Look at male suicide rates—sky-high, yet largely ignored. Look at the way society treats male victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. Men are…	/r/EverydayMisandry	15/02/25 12:01 PM
7	AskFeminists Delusion Misandry isn't 'misused'; these people are just purposefully misinterpreting it to make it seem like a lesser term compared to its exact counterpart, misogyny. The only people not bothering to check definitions are these individuals; it's the exact same thing as misogyny. Misogyny is hatred, prejudice, or contempt for women or girls. It's a form of bigotry based on sex/gender, similar to racism and misandry. Misandry is the hatred, contempt, or prejudice against men or boys. It's a form of bigot…	/r/EverydayMisandry	14/02/25 11:24 PM
17	Anti men rhetoric being yet again treated like fact This is just another example of people using porn as some kind of reference point for real relationships, which is just dumb. Porn is staged, exaggerated, and designed for visual stimulation—not actual intimacy. If someone’s basing their expectations of sex on that, they’ve already lost the plot. And let’s be real: most guys who actually love their woman (and vice versa), who are in a real monogamous relationship, want to please her and her him. They’re not out here skipping foreplay and treatin…	/r/EverydayMisandry	13/02/25 10:11 AM
3	Ah yes, fragile men These feminists claim to be all about "empowering women," but the second a woman exercises real autonomy—meaning independent thought—they turn into an unhinged mob. It’s not about freedom; it’s about control. They don’t want women to think for themselves—they want them to conform to a rigid, cult-like ideology where dissent isn’t tolerated. The way they attack women who step out of line is proof of that. Instead of debating ideas or engaging in actual discussion, they resort to insults like "pic…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/02/25 05:10 PM
3	Ah yes, fragile men It's all about maintaining that victimhood status because it grants power, sympathy, and social leverage. If men were allowed to be seen as victims or if women were held accountable as perpetrators, the entire structure of modern feminist narratives would collapse. The whole ideology thrives on the idea that women are perpetual underdogs, no matter how much power, privilege, or influence they actually hold. They push this idea that women can do no wrong while men are always the villains. If a wo…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/02/25 04:50 PM
6	Ah yes, fragile men The double standard is blatant. When a male celebrity acts out, he's labelled insecure, fragile, and entitled. But when a female celebrity does the same thing, suddenly it’s "society can’t handle strong women" or "people just hate successful women." It’s pure gender bias, but they’ll never admit it. Accountability should be universal—bad behaviour, which is bad behaviour, regardless of gender. But people like that Redditor will twist the narrative to protect their idols, all while pretending the…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/02/25 04:09 PM
18	Ah yes, fragile men It's a classic projection. Instead of acknowledging that maybe—just maybe—Taylor Swift isn't universally adored and that people had legitimate reasons for booing - this person immediately jumps to the tired "people hate women" excuse. Plenty of women were also booing her, but somehow, that fact just gets ignored. If a male celebrity acted the same way, throwing a fit over getting booed at a major public event, he'd be roasted into oblivion—called insecure, fragile, an egomaniac But when it's Tay…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/02/25 02:02 PM
2	Unbridled Hatred You saw “men built civilization” and had a knee-jerk reaction, even though i explicitly acknowledged women's contributions. The whole point of my argument was responding to an attack on men—of course, i was going to focus on men’s role first. That doesn’t mean I was dismissing women’s role, which i'm gonna clearly lay out in detail afterwards. This is the problem with these people—they don’t actually read or think critically. They scan for something that triggers them and immediately jump to str…	/r/EverydayMisandry	08/02/25 07:51 AM
8	Unbridled Hatred Babies can't be made out of bone marrow; that's just something theoretical that was practised on mice. To have it carried out on humans would be impossible. We're an entirely different species, and there's a huge mass and size difference. Also, even if possible, the "baby" would be predisposed to a high chance of getting a genetic mutation. This would basically be inbreeding. There's a higher chance of carrying the same recessive gene, which can be expressed in the offspring if inherited from bo…	/r/EverydayMisandry	07/02/25 11:26 PM
29	This comment section is disgusting They’ll scream “gender equality” when it comes to avoiding responsibilities—no cooking, no nurturing, no submission—but suddenly it’s “where are the real men?” when it comes to footing the bill, making sacrifices, and protecting them. They love to critique masculinity when it suits them, but the second their comfort and safety are at risk, they demand men step up. They’re basically just reinforcing traditional masculinity but in a way that benefits them exclusively. And they don’t even see the c…	/r/EverydayMisandry	05/02/25 07:56 AM
1	I don't even bother attempting to find a date for a reason "Do you think women didn't fear SA before modern media? This fear is taught to us to protect us." Yes, fear of assault has existed for centuries, but fear doesn't equate to reality. Fear is a defensive mechanism, not proof of the statistical likelihood of something happening. Teaching caution is fine, but perpetuating exaggerated fears creates paranoia. Just because someone you know experienced something doesn't mean it’s an epidemic or reflects the behaviour of the majority. Also, women fearing…	/r/EverydayMisandry	18/01/25 06:22 PM
2	I don't even bother attempting to find a date for a reason "1% of men are responsible for these crimes is based on conviction data...most victims never report it" Yes, underreporting exists, but assuming that every unreported case automatically means there's a massive, hidden epidemic of perpetrators inflates the issue unrealistically. The 1% figure comes from broader studies—not just convictions but self-reports, victimization surveys, and population studies. Even factoring in underreporting, there's no evidence to suggest the percentage of perpetrator…	/r/EverydayMisandry	18/01/25 05:33 AM
55	Yeah maybe you should have asked men this question The idea that men inherently find pleasure in their partner's suffering is a bizarre, misandrist fantasy that speaks more to the commenter’s worldview than reality. Most men prioritize their partner’s comfort and pleasure during intimacy. The implication that men are sadists who want to see women suffer is not only insulting—it’s a flat-out lie for the vast majority. The claim that anal sex “evidences the woman would do anything” for a man’s insecure ego is ridiculous. Intimacy is supposed to be…	/r/EverydayMisandry	18/01/25 04:33 AM
24	Apparently this subreddit shouldn’t exist because Misandry isn’t real lmao Their entire argument rests on the premise that even the “best” husbands are inherently entitled, power-hungry, and controlling. This is pure projection. Most men in healthy relationships care deeply for their wives and work as equal partners. Their claim isn’t based on any real evidence—it’s designed to instill doubt and mistrust in women about their own partners. By suggesting that men “act sweet” only because they’re getting a good deal, they’re pushing a paranoid, toxic narrative that poison…	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/01/25 07:31 PM
4	I don't even bother attempting to find a date for a reason The claim that less than 1% of men are responsible for these crimes is based on conviction data, not random guesses. Less than 1% of the male population in the U.S. are convicted of rape. Does this mean every perpetrator is caught? Of course not. But that doesn’t mean the vast majority of men are committing these crimes, either. The perception of prevalence is often inflated due to how statistics are presented (e.g., focusing on reported instances without comparing them to the total population).…	/r/EverydayMisandry	16/01/25 06:07 PM
7	I don't even bother attempting to find a date for a reason "Not all men, but..." This is a classic bait-and-switch. You claim you don’t think all men are dangerous but then justify treating all men with suspicion as if that's the only rational response. This logic would never fly in other contexts: Imagine saying, "Not all women, but I’ll assume all women are capable of killing infants because some do." Or: "Not all [insert any group], but I’ll treat every individual as a potential threat because some are dangerous." That kind of reasoning is just preju…	/r/EverydayMisandry	16/01/25 01:54 PM
22	I don't even bother attempting to find a date for a reason Claiming that all men should be feared because some men commit heinous acts is a classic case of guilt by association. This ignores individual agency and reduces an entire gender to a stereotype based on the actions of a tiny, deviant minority. While it's true that men make up the majority of offenders in certain crimes, the vast majority of men are not criminals, let alone rapists or murderers. Using statistics to fuel blanket assumptions about an entire group is dishonest and harmful. Acts lik…	/r/EverydayMisandry	15/01/25 05:37 PM
5	Another gem There's a lot of money in perpetuating these ideas. Public colleges and universities are essentially businesses, and they get funding from promoting certain ideologies. Misandry is part of that because it helps fuel division, keeps people angry, and ensures that certain groups stay relevant—especially those pushing for more resources and funding. It's all about creating a narrative that fits an agenda.	/r/EverydayMisandry	12/01/25 11:08 PM
6	Another gem They cherry-pick crimes like rape, stalking, and domestic violence but completely leave out others like child abuse, for obvious reasons. And as for mass shootings, yeah, they're incredibly rare but get included while infanticide, which happens more often, is ignored. It’s a clear bias in what they choose to highlight. Now, baby farmers, or people who harm infants, are overwhelmingly women in historical cases, so it’s odd they leave that out of these “stats” when they’re so keen on generalizing …	/r/EverydayMisandry	12/01/25 11:06 PM
12	Another gem The misuse of statistics to paint an entire gender with a broad brush is a dangerous and misleading narrative. It’s true that the "stats" from things like Tough Guise 2 get weaponized to make sweeping generalizations about all men, implying that violence, rape, and other crimes are inherent to men. But when you really look at the data, it doesn’t hold up. For example, while men as a group may have higher representation in crimes like armed robbery, rape, and homicide, it’s essential to point out…	/r/EverydayMisandry	12/01/25 08:47 PM
10	On a post asking “What did you grow up believing that ended up being a complete lie?” It's ridiculous basing sweeping judgments about an entire gender on the actions of a few individuals. Just because one man approached her with bad intentions doesn’t mean all men share those intentions, and it’s intellectually lazy to make that leap. Imagine flipping the roles: if a guy generalized all women based on one bad experience, he’d be branded a misogynist faster than you can say "double standard." But when a woman does it, society excuses it as venting or empowerment, ignoring how it f…	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/01/25 11:52 PM
1	Obviously this case is horrific… blaming men collectively for what this group of men did isn’t right either though- the vast majority of men would never dream of doing something as sadistic as this Heres an article on 500 female sex offenders if you wanna play devils advocate. (https://canadiancrc.com/FEMALE_TEACHER_SEX_OFFENDERS-SEXUAL_ASSAULT_Female_Sexual_Predators-RAPE_MALES.aspx) I'm pointing out something important about the sheer imbalance in perception and societal response. Comparing 500 cases of women sexually assaulting students with 72 men involved in gang rape clearly illustrates two things: Both Are Rape,Regardless of gender, rape is rape. Both statistics involve the exploita…	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/12/24 12:45 PM
6	Obviously this case is horrific… blaming men collectively for what this group of men did isn’t right either though- the vast majority of men would never dream of doing something as sadistic as this They're trying to take a small group of criminal idiots and somehow spin it into this blanket statement about all men. It's like saying all women are crazy or all guys are the same based on a few bad apples. It doesn't work that way. The problem here isn't all men; it's the individuals who commit these heinous acts. These people are obviously sick and twisted, but using them as a reason to demonize an entire gender is just a lazy, emotionally charged argument that’s designed to push an agenda. T…	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/12/24 12:11 PM
37	Women getting confused or upset when men treat them like normal human beings. In other words that's equality. In the first scenario, the expectation that the man should help is based on societal norms, whereas in the third scenario, the woman denies responsibility for monitoring someone else’s food, claiming it's not her duty. This contrast reflects a double standard, as both involve a form of expectation or responsibility, yet the justifications for each differ. Its rooted in the broader debate about individual accountability versus societal obligations, especially when gender roles are considered. The…	/r/EverydayMisandry	21/12/24 05:12 PM
22	"Women have been opressed so it's your turn" First off, that narrative where men are just expected to "man up" while women are coddled and encouraged to express their emotions is a classic example of how society holds men to one set of standards and women to another. Men are told to keep their heads down, work hard, and “don’t complain,” while women are often seen as victims of some larger societal oppression, even though they are in many ways treated as the more privileged group today. The claim of women’s “oppression” is an absolute joke…	/r/EverydayMisandry	20/12/24 06:03 PM
8	Defeating the bear The man vs bear comparison is just another fear monger tactic,theres nothing outstanding about it,feminists have used paranoic scenarios similar to this one to generalize all males as sex offenders or potential sex offenders for decades. The idea that all men are potential threats is absurd and deeply insulting. It's a manipulative tactic that undermines trust between people and shifts focus away from actual solutions to problems. Instead of addressing real-world issues in a nuanced way, these f…	/r/EverydayMisandry	08/12/24 12:59 AM
2	Imagine using someone’s horrific torture and murder as a political tool against your perceived enemies 1)I’m glad you think my grammar and structure are top-notch, but just because something is well-organized doesn’t mean it’s AI. I’ve been writing like this for years. 2)I put a bit of effort into organizing my thoughts, so they come across clearly. It’s not AI, just someone thinking critically and laying out their points logically. 3)I didn’t know that well-structured sentences were exclusive to ChatGPT. Guess everyone who writes in a clear and organized way must be using AI, huh? 4)ChatGPT is n…	/r/EverydayMisandry	06/12/24 10:34 AM
3	Imagine using someone’s horrific torture and murder as a political tool against your perceived enemies Articulation of my arguments are somehow aligned with chat gtp,is this because i added some nuance(i see some areas black,others white, sometimes others grey)so people cloud understand where im coming from,imagine needing to downplay someone else’s arguments instead of making your own,come on.	/r/EverydayMisandry	05/12/24 02:26 AM
10	Imagine using someone’s horrific torture and murder as a political tool against your perceived enemies Why This Generalization is Flawed: Psychological Factors Over Gender: Heinous crimes like these are often rooted in psychological disorders, traumatic upbringings, or sociopathic tendencies. These traits are not tied to gender; they are the result of individual pathology or environmental influences. Confirmation Bias: Feminist arguments that use isolated cases to claim that such behavior is inherently "male" often fall into the trap of confirmation bias—using evidence that supports their narrati…	/r/EverydayMisandry	04/12/24 11:16 PM
9	And That’s Why Her and Her Husband Are Getting Divorced This kind of thinking reduces meaningful gestures to mere materialistic transactions. The true value of a gift lies in the thought and effort behind it, not its price tag. Reducing Valentine's Day or any occasion to a measure of monetary value dismisses the emotional connection that gifts should represent. Flowers, for instance, symbolize appreciation, love, and care, not just something "cheap." If someone equates their worth to the dollar value of a gift, it says more about their priorities tha…	/r/EverydayMisandry	04/12/24 03:55 PM
9	Boy gets raped, then he's sent to jail That kind of reasoning falls apart under scrutiny when you consider the practical realities of such situations. Here’s why: Physical Capability and Power Dynamics: A 12-year-old boy is generally prepubescent or just entering puberty, which means he is unlikely to have the physical strength, size, or maturity to overpower a 17-year-old girl. The age gap actually favors the older party in terms of physical and emotional development. Suggesting a 12-year-old could physically dominate a 17-year-old …	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/12/24 10:20 AM
2	People in glass houses throw stones, as always Vilifying boys by telling them that being male iherently makes them by default rapists will make them actual rapists. These fools physcologically idoctrinate them into beliving that they are rapists because they are male Boys eventually start to belive this false notion and partake in these acts because thats what they've been told they are. Feminists create the same promblem they claim they are against. Cycle continues. Generalising all males as rapists for simply being male when its is commite…	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/11/24 03:30 PM