TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Minerva_x4 Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by Minerva_x4 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Height: 6'0" and above. High level of facial masculinization; Wide shoulders Waist hip ratio close to 0.9 Mentally: maturity, confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 12:58 AM
1

The desire for sex is a biologically induced urge Agree. And the desire to have sex with some people (and not with others) is biological as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 05:05 PM
3

https://psmag.com/8-000-years-ago-17-women-reproduced-for-every-one-man-6d41445ae73d#.e7lijkz9k Except oops, even in recent times women reproduce more often. And mortality would have affected daughters too but they still ended reproducing at more frequent rates than males. But, by all means, don't let the facts get in the way of defensiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 02:46 PM
7

Why? Because he is unable to fulfill natural, biological desires The "sex is natural" argument is not really an argument though. We know that in our past there were more females that reproduced than males (around 17 females for 1 male or so). Is it as much "natural" for a male not having sex as it is for him to have sex so the point is moot really.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 08:21 AM
4

Mixed Eurasian often are very cute. Brandon Lee was omg sooo hot. For me it's not really the racial background but a lot of Asian men tend to be on the short and feminine side, which tend to be a turn off.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 06:00 AM
3

Yup, exactly. They're not rejecting women because women never wanted them in the first place. They're preserving their ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 02:53 PM
2

Who said we do? It's just something that's part of a good sex life. We simply go for guys that are more likely to provide said orgasms (guys we think are good looking/hot, guys that attract us physically).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 09:00 AM
1

Dude listen; no one is so ugly that they can't find someone. There are guys with extreme deformities; Treacher Collins and things like that that have partners. The girls twins with one spinal cord have had BFs. However, if you are a run-of-the-mill ugly guy (not nearly as extreme as the above cases) and you're expecting a cute or physically attractive girl then yes, you won't succeed. It's not your face or your height that's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 08:40 AM
1

My other answer is that these women wish that low SMV men would "know their place". Damn those entitled women for wanting a man that's of equal desirability as themselves. Truly, the unattractive man that's expecting a more desirable woman than he is or someone that brings more to the table is the most un-entitled of all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 08:10 AM
2

Maybe not "incels" but maybe teach sexual selection, natural selection, evolution in general and things like that which could include stuff like some individuals will experience more reproductive success than others while some simply won't. Particularly in regards to males.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 07:51 AM
1

Unattractive/ugly? Expect to get attractive girls despite not being attractive himself?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 08:35 AM
1

You probably should state 5'9 as your height then (and usually when girls wants to know a guy's height it's barefoot). There's quite a bit of difference between 5'9 and 5'11 and any girl that put some relative importance on height is gonna notice it and is possibly not gonna like that you didn't advertise your height honestly. 5'9 is a bit of the short side depending on location but I see plenty of 5'1-5'2 girls with guys in that range so you should have no trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 03:04 AM
2

I agree with the citrusdrink76. You seem to have the basic foundations. Though, personally I (and many girls I know and have spoken to) being more "bulked up" is not always necessary. If you have a nice jawline, wide enough shoulders etc I don't personally really care if the guy is a little on the skinny side. How tall are you, OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 11:06 AM
1

The only thing that's objwctive are high cheekbones and height, both of wich I have https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/52aaqe/buffmuscular_men_what_are_your_insecurities/d7iwiuz That people will see me as pretentious. That I am aware of not having good looks and height so I am compensating k
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 10:18 AM
2

If I'm single and the guy is cute, sure. As long as I've made some kind of indication that I might find you cute, no harm done. Sometimes though, it's some guy that did not received any signs of interests. It's kind of creepy then.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 10:07 AM
3

Feminism rejects imposed gender roles for people. If a woman wants to do a traditional role she's free to do that in feminism only now she's not forced to like before. I'm not sure what you're arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 05:04 AM
1

Oh god refusing to acknowledging basic difference between the sexes is what's sad. And defeati(st)? Please do not project your male pov unto me. The world do not revolve around your pee pee and women generally do not think with their pee-pees. You mentionned in another post that you're not attractive and short so I understand that you probably need to keep telling you to "keep a positive attitude" to go through the day, but I'm a woman, how would it benefit me to argue most men have a shot with …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/16 04:23 AM
1

I'd say it depends on your age/demographics. In the general population it's basically average. But for college age younger men in their early 20s, it's kind of short honestly. Despite what some really insecure (and a bit defensive) dudes will argue on reddit, 6'0" is not particularly tall for a man in that age group/demographic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 10:13 AM
5

Men are basically attracted to the majority of young women. In mammals, males (or at least, the few male that manages to mate) will simply try to mate with every female available, with little to no parental investment. Women are simply not attracted to most men. High biological investment. Swimmers are cheap and plentiful, eggs are costly and rare. The average man for me is as far away as someone who could elicit desire as one could imagine. It's one of those difference between the sexes that I …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 09:57 AM
1

These RLs are purely based on monetary transactions. Believe me, money does not make any of these ugly guys any less physically repulsive to us. And the women he's been with are no doubts physically sick every time she has sex with him. Sure, some might think having access to this kind of wealth would be worth the pain, but for me it would not be worth it at all. As long as someone has a decent amount of money to live comfortably (not necessarily 'rich') it's much better than this kind of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 06:24 AM
3

Men are attracted to a much larger percentage of the population than we are. Plus being larger on average they don't usually fear being overpowered by a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 05:34 AM
1

What? If anything more attractive people are more likely to be healthier -both physically and mentally, on average than ugly people. Sounds like an ugly guy thing trying to rationalize their jealousy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 05:26 AM
5

A lot of men seem to have trouble accepting the realities of "leagues", despite them seemingly being obsessed with it (I find the term silly personally, I just call it "similar people pairing up" which shouldn't surprise anyone that's out of school tbh)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 06:42 AM
0

Yep. I would agree the movement is hostile towards shitty men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 05:22 AM
1

Small hands. Small frame. Short height. Narrow shoulders. Weak chin. Large nose (even worse when in pair). Women hips. Moobs. Weak or inability to grow facial hair. Mentally: lack of confidence. Misogyny. (though they seem to possess the above traits often, so I don't usually have to worry to like a guy and he turns out to be a misogynist or something)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 02:26 AM
3

No. Sorry OP you couldn't be more wrong. You seem to be under some delusion that we do what we do, or even choose the partners we chooses out of some weird desire to spite you or something. The reality is we don't care about unattractive men. Their very existence is not something we think about, theirs is an inconsequential one afawk. When I see some ugly or unattractive dude on the street, I don't go "Grrr! I hate that ugly guy with his inferior reproductive material!!!!!" Off chance: maybe I'l…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 07:28 AM
1

Ahah, neckbeard really is a thing. Usually they're guys who can grow some facial hair..but not quite. As an example http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/15/07/54daf1f7c34a8_-_cruise-8wvmuk-620.jpeg
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 08:02 AM
2

I would guess he would look somewhat like the character in Napoleon Dynamite (the brother of the main character). There'd be a higher chance of him being ugly and/or unattractive, possibly short -5'8" or lower. Likely on the spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 04:24 AM
2

But, I don't understand how can you know you wasted opportunities if you didn't had sex during those years? Sometimes, people ascribe meanings or opportunities when thinking back on something when those things didn't existed (or hamstering if you will).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 03:42 AM
3

Women in college go after sexually attractive men, I hope this is not a revelation to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 11:18 AM
4

Since what you listed pretty much comes down to the physical -Good height (6'2"-6'3" ideal but could be as low as 6'0") -Masculine facial structure/face (very important things like wide jawline etc) -Relatively masculine body (not as important to me personally things like women hips, small hands, moobs etc are a turn off to me, just my personal preference) -Maybe fall under idiosyncratic preference but facial hair is a plus to me. It's not so much the hair itself (I generally prefer clean shaven…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 04:14 AM
2

Around my age (22) honestly. Older than 25 and the difference in life experience, dissimilarities etc start to show. 30 and up is just downright creepy at this point in time. It's not the age itself but the difference. A 42yo woman and 52yo man would be less drastic I believe, even though the gap is wider technically. Anyway, not sure why you wish that women prefer older men, or why you'd assume you'll necessarily be more attractive at 30? To answer your question: there's no single, universal an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 03:33 AM
2

Depends of her body language, and if he is trying to grab her attention despite her having a body language that indicate she doesn't want interacting with him(no eye contact, turning/moving away, no smiling etc) and ultimately if she's interested in him or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 11:35 PM
2

An ugly man saying hi to a woman walking down a street and an attractive man saying hi will yield two different responses. In your hypothetical scenario there are two different responses because there are two different states of interest; first case she is interested and second case she is not interested, correct? Everyone here I think agrees that the good looking guy is more likely to provoke a positive reaction/interest. But it's not the initial disinterest that's labelled creepy, it when he f…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 02:05 PM
4

Creepy is code for "guy is ignoring 'lack of interest' of the girl". Yes, there's a higher chance that she won't be interested if the guy's unattractive but he is creepy for ignoring her lack of interest, not because he is ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 01:55 PM
5

To put it another way: yes, we're not going to be interested/won't want to continue the interaction because you're ugly and we'll be interested/will try to keep the conversation if we find you attractive ( hey, people prefer others they're attracted to)...but being ugly isn't what makes a guy creepy and lots of people don't seem to understand that. Creepy is when a guy ignores the girl's lack of interest. It's just that there's a higher chance (not guaranteed mind you) that there won't be a lack…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 01:47 PM
3

lol It's amazing how insecure a lot of males are when it comes to women's sexual and reproductive agency isn't it? That you get called a eugenicist or given pearls such as "Hitler would approve" really speaks volume how these males are invested in this narrative. I suspect it's a form of evolutionary strategy: they can't attract the opposite sex as they exhibit unfit phenotypes (indicating that they are a poor mating partner) so they seek to control or restrict women's choices. You can still see…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/16 04:25 AM
1

Most likely that he was physically unattractive/ugly and that his social skills suffered as a consequence. Possibly on the ASD.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 04:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter