TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Minimum_Guitar4305 Archive

View 0 posts and 94 comments by Minimum_Guitar4305 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-11

male loneliness crisis benig framed as a problem with men not reaching out, To people they know... even though most feminists think randomly approaching a women is creepy and predator behavior... to strangers. You're conflating very different things here IMO.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 04:44 PM
0

Wtf does Russell's teapot have to do with Gender?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 07:56 AM
0

Understanding a problem is useful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 07:46 AM
-3

Patriarchy, is patriarchy theory. The issue with patriarchy theory isn't falisability per se, it's still useful as an analytical lens, a framework of understanding. The issue with patriarchy theory occurs when it becomes the only theoretical framework used to understand a problem. That's when it becomes dogmatic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 09:15 PM
1

Gender is Biopsychosocial.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 06:50 PM
9

Russian apologist detected. Ukrane is labelled barbaric - for having to fight. Doesnt happen on any other country on earth - not very many wars to compare it too. Russians offer big money, nice signing bonuses- Tell that to the dead North Koreans, tell that to the American youtuber serving in the Russian army and his wife. The war was never supported by Ukrainians - straight lies. Ukraine should just give up With only a passing mention of the gender issue of conscription? "Enough already."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 10:15 AM
4

Not American, but while many Auditors are bellends with ego's with agendas, I cannot condemn anyone for knowing and using their legal rights. While it's far less common than the USA audits have taken place in the past. Audit the Audits is a great channel - they go out of their way to adjudicate the right and wrong, from auditors and police. However sometimes I sense misogyny among many fans of auditors, often seeing comments that judge female public servants unfairly or implying they're "too emo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/25 11:08 PM
12

"Many studies show black American men face more discrimination than black American women." FTFY This is a global forum American's. Please remember this in your post titles, and stop posting things that presume your situation is universal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/25 10:15 AM
1

If you've asked and they don't want to be quoted, that's fair enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/25 12:06 AM
1

Why would I substitute them for Soccer when the most popular sports in my country aren't Soccer, don't involve heading the ball as a norm, and were tied to the concept of our national identity more than 50 years before the start of WW2? Your "belief" appears to be trying to force the square peg of an incredibly US-centric view, into the round hole of a global reality, while attempting to say something universal about culture, tradition, and feminism. They don't fit. Any theory that seeks to expl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 11:41 PM
1

A user? If you're going to quote someone you should at least have the decency to identify who they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 05:48 PM
14

One of my personal beliefs is that "culture" and "tradition" are mostly post-WW2 constructs with no real basis in actual history, and that a lot of what we think is the natural order of things is a by-product of very specific and unique time period. Thank you for dismissing the entire worlds "cultures" and "traditions", regardless of their particpation in WW2 or not, on the basis of "Boxing", "American Football", and "explosions"; and seemingly in complete ignorance of the USA's surviving cultur…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 03:37 PM
1

I asked under that assmption yes (because it's a highly common left wing view), but I didn't ask about immigration out of neccessity i.e. I'm not trying to 'purity' test you on immigration - wrong sub for that talk - it was just a convenient example). You can substitute it for another divisive ideological topic that's more appropriate like: Would you follow/financially reward a "cynical homophobe", who thinks that society should be strictly stratified or serperated on sexual identity lines, but …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 01:37 PM
5

You've identified him as a "cynical misogynist", find his views on feminism reductive, and reward him with a sub? I respect the freedom of idea's, and expression, and it appears you're cautious, aknowledging he's got good ideas, and also has some flaws, so I won't patronise you by giving you a warning. You're capable of making your own mind up about him, and deciding for yourself. I will ask you a question though. Let's say you came across a different Youtuber, you identified them as a "cynical …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 12:16 PM
2

This presumes that the only version of masculinity is one that is heteronormative, and pronatalist. My point is that masculinity being under attack doesn't just effect straight dads.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 12:09 PM
10

Be that as it may, masculinity isn't a synonym for fatherhood. If masculinity is under attack, it doesn't just affect those with families.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 11:51 AM
5

Masculinity isn't synonymonous with fatherhood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 11:50 AM
-2

So wages=masculinity to americans?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 07:59 AM
-5

I don't think so. I just think it looks that way to anyone who's gender conscious, who's looking at it from an egalitarian perspective. Is benovelent patriarchy misandrist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 03:04 PM
3

Just to clarify, I said that from a semantic, and logical position in response to your question. i.e. Your question was "why is the female way of expressing emotions seen as the default?" I was saying that generally men do not express emotion (non-expression) while women generally do, but "expressing" emotion is the default (regardless of female or male). I dont have specific data on whether or why "expression" is the default, it's more of a naturalistic statement. We have emotions, we evolved t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/25 03:51 PM
19

This is complicated to answer, but generally speaking yes. Women tend to be more expressive, men more stoic. Women report more intensity particularly for sadness/depression, men likely underreport how they feel. Women tend to be more empathetic, and are better at picking up on the emotions of others. Men are more likely to have alexithymyia (difficulties in feeling/identifying emotions). It's complicated because there are biological, social, and psychological factors at play, both at the individ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/25 09:02 AM
5

Patriarchy is a framework, used to better understand the complex idea of gender inequality. It's a scientifically unfalsifiable, heuristic tool of analysis. Not a "truth". It's a great tool, but as with all frameworks it's simplicity in analysing increasingly complex issues is it's weakness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 12:05 PM
4

It's suprising to me that you've managed to write so much on this topic, without directly mentioning "alexithmyia" or emotional blindness. That being a desciption of personality for those who have difficulty recognizing, expressing, feeling, sourcing, and/or describing emotions. It's an extremely important thing to consider when we're discussing this topic, for the reasons you have outlined, but also because there are two aspects to it: Normative Male Alexithymia: the sociological "Mask of Tradi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 05:34 PM
29

The answer is because feminism (both ideologically and academically) is prone to dogma. That has happened because the frameworks that Feminism is built on, patriarchy theory etc., are unfasfiable and unscientific. That doesn't mean they're of no value, (I think they're very valuabe) but just that the value of using them is in using them comparatively. They're simplistic ways of understanding complex problems. When theoretical frameworks falsely become accepted as "truth" (rather than a tool to d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 02:43 PM
8

I'm going to take a different tact, because I think you're approaching this along the correct lines, realising a lot of things, and looking to make it simple for yourself in the face of the complexity; and I think you're on the edge of elucidating something more with your questions. For example when you talk about the gender pay gap - "I can't really summarize it but I now understand it's so much more complicated than just looking at gender and average wage." Basically you're taking an antagonis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 01:01 PM
1

Yup, but now when you meet them you can tell them their views are out of touch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 08:24 PM
6

Slight typo - my bad. Mainstream academic feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 04:05 PM
18

The notion that Gender is a social construct is no longer promoted by mainstream feminism, because the biologists told them to shut up. Gender is biopsychosocial, a complex mix of genetic, sexual, pschyological, and societal factors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 12:19 PM
0

I said... that they retain this strength Not muscle. Strength is retained in transwomen, despite the fact that hormone therapy reduces the mass of muscle they have (reduced testosterone). Skeletal muscle size increased in TM (21% after 6 years) and decreased in TW (7% after 5 years). Muscle strength increased 18% after 6 years in TM (p = 0.003) but was statistically unchanged in TW. There is no higher muscle mass ceiling from having had male puberty. Are you sure? Meta analytical review of 24 st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/25 05:52 PM
0

Nonwithstanding those effects there is little evidence (that I'm aware of - open to correction) that shows that those gaps cannot be overcome, or how how strong the effect is. There is definitely no evidence out there to suggest that wealth disparities cause immediate safety concerns for low income athletes versus their wealthy compeitors. We have clear indications, from a plethora of different studies, that transwomen (that have gone through puberty) as a group are stronger than ciswomen, that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/25 02:05 PM
0

Meta analytical review of 24 studies concludes saying "Hormone therapy decreases strength, LBM and muscle area, yet values remain above that observed in cisgender women, even after 36 months. These findings suggest that strength may be well preserved in transwomen during the first 3 years of hormone therapy." Longitudinal studies examining the effects of testosterone suppression on muscle mass and strength in transgender women consistently show very modest changes, where the loss of lean body ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/25 04:48 PM
1

We have plenty of data which shows trans women have no advantage. Nope, you're the incorrect one. We have lots of data that showing that Transwomen have advantages and disadvantages over ciswomen, some of which are more advantageous than others in differing sports. TW that have undergone male puberty are stronger and taller than CW, but tend to have lower cardiovascular functions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/25 03:35 PM
-1

Nope. Transwomen retain strength and size advantages if they undergo male puberty, even after long term hormonal treatment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/25 03:31 PM
1

Outside of what has already been mentioned... Because people like simplicity, and avoiding the mental complexity of things/people that don't fit neatly into their preconceived frameworks of understanding.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/25 03:29 PM
3

I'd love to understand your process on that. To me it seems like a post-hoc justification for why feminist academia promoted ideology over reason; and one could also argue that it gave rise to gender critical feminism, became a lightning rod for the right against gender "ideology", and even TERF's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 11:16 AM
1

Mainstream Academic? Nope, not anymore. Takes a bit of time for the message that feminism spent decades uncritically examining and urging people to regurgitate verbatim to filter through to the unwashed masses though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 06:21 AM
3

Another suggestion: Gender is a Social Construct - False. Gender is not entirely a social construct, gender is biopsychosocial; a mix of biological, psychological, and societal factors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 09:50 PM
1

Why did I, a left wing male, come to a left wing male sub, that I am subscribed to? Jeez buddy I don't know?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/25 05:34 PM
1

👌
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/25 04:53 PM
1

He's entitled to his feelings. When coming on to a subreddit, it would be better to have those feelings directed in a meaningful and coherent way - so that the rest of us can make sense of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/25 01:27 PM
0

But it looks like feminists don't want fair equality but cis women 's supremacy. Some do yes. You are clearly having a little bit of an emotional rant though, because you're all over the place right now. Are you upset about Trans peoples rights in the UK, are you upset about gay male surrogacy issues in Europe, feminism....? (You're allowed to be upset by all of it for the record - it's just that you're jumping wildly to disparate topics instead of making articulable points or linking your thoug…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 03:02 PM
21

Trans women are not recognized as women. Only in the context of the Equality Act 2010. It's also important to note that this same act still prohibits discrimination against trans people. Feminists and other transphobes Feminists aren't a monolith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 02:46 PM
1

True, but you gotta identify who is and isn't going to be open to your message too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 12:15 PM
3

In my experience 50% of feminists are egalitarian, and 50% are misandrists. Take that as you will.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 11:46 PM
2

Feminism is a left wing political philosophy. Due to it's support of other left wing views, it has largely become mainstream (even amongst moderates/progressives on the right). Feminism also has some very vocal opponents, mostly further to the right. This is a site for people who advocate for men and masculinity, and critique feminism, from an unusual perspective, that of the left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/25 08:03 PM
2

But you're missing the main reason males moved right. It's because the wider left hates them, Addressed in the article no? Maybe not as pointedly as you've stated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 11:41 AM
18

...what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 08:42 PM
10

I dont deny there are male privileges. I'm privileged with the ability to piss outside easily. I just think feminism promotes wilful ignorance about women's privileges.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 09:53 PM
2

Some other discussion on one the T&F article here - https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/6IIpnHSVoS
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 11:52 AM
1

Why shouldn't I when this is literaly where this whole stereotype came from? Because you're talking about all the Internet, and the western world online is not a homogeneous Americana. Because you appear to be making an assumption about a small ethnic minority in a single country, and extrapolating that outward to explain a broad cultural issue that stretches far beyond the USA's borders - or can you sustain your claims about it being the origin? Because this is a Global forum, and if you want t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 09:52 AM
-7

Is the Internet sexist you ask. Then you procede to talk exclusively about America, and African-Americans. I have never heard a Black American use the term coddled, but I know plenty of Irish people (not Irish Americans) that do; i also wasn't aware that Black Americans exclusively constitute "The Internet".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/25 09:24 PM
39

Women are less likely to critique feminist narratives. Men are less likely to engage in any feminist education whatsoever. Both are biases.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/25 11:52 PM
6

Name the movie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/24 12:17 AM
20

Patriarchy is unfalsfiable, therefore unprovable scientifically. It is simply a theoretical framework, or lens to be used in analysis (a useful one) but no more valid than any other competing framework. That is not what feminists do, or how they utilise it. Instead, it is considered a grand male power conspiracy, one that we are all supposedly guilty of perpetuating.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/24 06:39 PM
13

Haven't fully gone through all links etc, but as other have pointed out tour first link is a discussion article and the survey design of the second, and how they intentionally sourced women who would admit to perpetuating SV makes it poor as quantitative research. This is a much more thorough meta-analysis of multiple studies from 12 countries which compared male the countries officially recorded crime stats against self-reprorted victimisation in the study. https://www.researchgate.net/publicat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/24 07:43 PM
1

You read my mind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/24 07:35 PM
2

Neo-Republican, as left wing as you can get while still beleiving in idealsed society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/24 10:00 PM
8

I think more American's (particularly disaffected GOP & DEM supporters) should read into Neo-Republicanism (no relation to the GOP), by Pettit etc. It seeks to redefine the overall concept of liberty, in response to neo/&liberal view. The liberal view being that liberty is non-interference. The Neo-Republican view that liberty is freedom from domination (by legal, cultural, economic, or political forces), equal rights and equal accountability.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/24 09:48 PM
1

Not really. Irelands society has definitely become more progressive, and less religious, but most of the most corrosive and extreme versions of feminsm never took route here. Until maybe the 80-90s the largest feminist organisation in Ireland was the Irish Countrywomens Association. Feminist and feminsim still have the same general biases e.g. in 2022 men made up 2/5s of the total calls to domestic violence lines but got 1% of Gov. funding; and women their overall privileges that some are blind …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/24 06:46 PM
8

I'm an egalitarian but my ideals of equality are informed by feminist perspectives, but I'm not a feminist in the modern sense. My views on equality are neo-Republican, and I'm LGBTQ+ too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 09:37 PM
4

The last election? Irelands was on Friday. Youre on the Internet. It is available globally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/24 12:20 PM
18

It's an international norm yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 12:21 PM
9

Couldn't agree more. Toxic behaviour is all that needs to be said. Feminist toxicity, poisoning men against ideas of equality is something we can talk about though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 12:02 PM
-7

Nope Jesus wept americas fucking doomed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/24 07:50 AM
-7

And the idea of at least she's not a literal fucking facist didn't factor into that boting decision did it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/24 06:52 AM
14

Because feminism has dragged the "overton window" on gender consciousness to the point that is most favourable to them, paints Males as the perennial aggressor/perpatrators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 10:21 AM
24

Had a rather toxic manager a few years back, and we started butting heads. Things escalated when she cried wolf and labelled me sexist to the VP (I imagine it served her well previously, hell it might even have been true on some occasions). Of course no-one thought to ask my previous manager in the same company, also a woman - someone I'd have followed into battle unquestioningly. It all fell apart when I pointed that out... I'll regret how I handled her, and not going to HR over that entire ord…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/24 05:04 PM
19

I dont think gendering toxic behaviour serves any purpose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 11:34 PM
5

You're welcome. Thank you for thanking me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 12:30 PM
8

You better correct this then - there is no Irish body called the state exchange commission. There is a State Examinations Commission.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/24 09:23 AM
30

"We must laugh at man to avoid crying for him" - Napoleon Bonaporte
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 06:19 PM
0

We do too. We also use the term feminism and women all too interchangeably.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/24 06:23 PM
0

I supposed I shouldn't be surprised, but i thought this place was a little better than mensrights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/24 11:01 PM
2

I've been asked it more in the last year (new city) than in the past 10
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/24 04:51 PM
2

Sports teams assuming you've the right team environment/culture. Mythically rare, but Barber shops. Mens Shed's (when they're not being protested/shut down by vitriolic feminist lunatics).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/24 09:52 AM
-6

If you can't figure out the big words that's on you, not feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 08:12 PM
5

“Their lingo” is part of the problem. In order to have a constructive discussion with them, you have to learn the terminology they control they control and agree with the definitions... You're criticising nothing except the use of language and jargon here - if you want to critique economics, you need to know the terminology, same with law, philosophy etc. agree with the definitions and systems they define No... you can of course critique systems and definitions without accepting them. If that we…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 04:43 PM
10

Thats fair enough, sorry for the confusion. I was referring more to this part of the top comment: You're trying to use their silly words against them. It's a bad plan. Not only are they masters of misdirection when it comes to abusing language to suit their needs, it's confusing to the onlookers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 11:57 AM
6

How could you read my saying that I dont identify as a feminist and take that to mean I'm calling for us to "call ourselves feminists"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 11:33 AM
6

It's certainly more challenging online, which is why I referenced IRL, but thats not a view that holds with much if any of the academic discourse that's focused on how to counter other types of extremist ideologies (and lets be honest even feminist extremists aren't picking up AKs to gun down men) that's been published since the rise of ISIS.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 11:30 AM
7

Because you'll be immediately dismissed as nothing more than a misogynist and then ignored. If your aim is to do nothing only scream into male space echo chambers, rather than actively counter the issues you point out, it's a great plan. If you actually want to change anyones perspectives (on anything), then showing knowledge of their perspective, and then outlining its flaws is paramount.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 10:00 AM
47

I disagree. I did some introductory sociology and gender studies classes and whenever I do speak with feminists offline there's two reactions I get. Immediate hostility/derision when I say that I don't identify as a feminist, but as an egalitarian. Surprise when they realise I'm gender conscious, familiar with at least the basic concepts of feminism, able to use their vernacular, able to delineate academic feminist perspectives (as important a field as any for research), and historic perspective…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 09:51 AM
35

I love people like you on Reddit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 10:08 AM
1

Feminist examinations of social issues can be quite valuable if they are mixed with a more materialist philosophy imo. "Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve." Karl Popper. I value feminist perspectives because they provide a simple, easy to use, framework I can apply to analyse the world, and better understand it. I value right wing frameworks for the same reason. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/24 11:53 PM
2

/r/ireland?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 05:08 PM
2

Good old fashioned classism! The joys... I don't know if you're familiar with American culture historically, Holy shit! An American, on Reddit, cognisant that other cultures exist and that the world (and this site), and the people in it aren't all American!!! Are you a unicorn too? I see why you don't fit in here haha. I drifted from /r/mensrights a long time ago, found it far too toxic (including passively) - it was poisoning my view of women entirely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 08:29 PM
1

Thanks for your perspective and sorry to hear. What's a normie here? Cisgendered & heteronormative? That said, I'm unsurprised to hear that someone who identifies as a liberal may feel unwelcome on a left wing platform though?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 07:35 PM
2

I didn't read it that way, but thats fair. My bad!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 07:12 PM
3

I'm relatively new to this sub (although not mens spaces on reddit), so truthfully i don't see your perspective. Can you elaborate?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 06:58 PM
2

Any last vestiges of unequal rights for women were gone by the 1970s Careful with the over-generalisations. right about time for the cosmic balance to favor us That's literally what we're condemning feminists for in this thread. An eye for an eye isn't equality. This is meant with respect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 06:19 PM
26

As I said, my country has a larger problem with unchecked migration than the Netherlands. Reality is subjective, and you are simply echoing the point this article is refuting. That is not to say that all asylum seekers are honest or deserve to remain, there are chancers and those that abuse us, but denouncing them all as animals is literally one of the most disgusting things I have seen on this subreddit. You see them as sub-human. Your attitude is part of the problem. You are advocating for the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 10:15 AM
35

Dehumanisation of asylum seekers is not something I expect to see on a left wing subreddit, and that's coming from someone who's country has a much larger problem with this issue than the fucking Netherlands...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 09:57 AM
1

You are supposed to rate them, on a scale 1-6(?) of agreement/disagreement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/24 04:21 PM
52

I don’t want equality. I want liberation from men’s oppression. That’s what feminism is about. No response from feminists to correct this misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/24 02:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter