TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MinisterOf Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by MinisterOf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There are all sorts of relationships, the term does not imply monogamy.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 04:32 PM
1

my wife is a saint and there wasnt a damn thing wrong with her. Nothing wrong with her, but plenty wrong with the "one partner for life" prevalent social norm. People think that you need to somehow fail in order for your partner to get an urge to cheat (or vice versa). This is not really necessary, just a convenient excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 02:48 PM
3

One thing to try is to toss your social awareness out of the window, and be a boorish jerk, completely ignoring any subtle clues. Not the best approach in the world, but I think being overly sensitive to how you're perceived is holding you back. Seems awful, but I don't see how the results could be any worse than your current approach. I'm just not what a lot of women want As a man, you have the ability to adapt, in various ways. Figure out what they want (it's often not what they say they want)…
/r/seduction15/07/16 08:10 PM
7

There's no point in faking confidence in anonymous internet posts, especially when looking for honest advice.
/r/seduction15/07/16 08:05 PM
1

Uglier? With Mick Jagger as the father, the kid did not exactly hit the good looks jackpot to begin with...
/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 07:16 PM
1

Precisely. OP says she's "about to hit the wall", but likelihood is old Mick will hit a far more firm and final wall way before any potential trouble catches up with him. Not to mention, with his money, rules of thumb applying to the regular working Joe no longer hold.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/16 07:13 PM
34

Wrong. In any properly run scientific study, you always have a hypothesis that you're trying to confirm or discard. Sure, there's a place for brainstorming and digging around various sources and data sets to generate ideas (hypotheses), but if you're a proper scientist and not just an entertainer/quack, in the end you still have to design and run a study to confirm or discard your hypothesis.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 05:56 PM
2

This doesn't seem like a right question for this subreddit. Managing a mental illness is complex, and by definition not a routine matter where generalized (one size fits all) advice is suitable. Might be better to leave this question to the professionals familiar with the specifics of your case? For example if breakdowns of a certain type are likely in the future, might be better to let someone relevant know the potential problem (so they can manage it), rather than to pretend you're fully in co…
/r/askTRP01/07/16 04:28 PM
0

So, if an actual licensed gynecologist derives sexual gratification from his medical exams (performed without impropriety), would you consider that a sex crime?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 07:20 PM
1

That case with the strap on was not a man, it was a woman posing as a man. I don't think concealing a physical defect should count as rape. Say, if you have a prosthetic leg (instead of a prosthetic penis), but aren't particularly eager to highlight that fact to your partner... it's iffy for sure, but obviously not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 07:17 PM
4

Namely, the bottom 10%.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 08:34 AM
8

ED medication (Viagra/Cialis/Levitra or generic equivalents) is remarkably effective. Using it will free you from performance anxiety, and then you'll be free to focus on improving technique.
/r/seduction25/06/16 10:08 PM
1

be worth more to him as an LTR than as a plate That was a traditional approach to building solid monogamous relationships (in addition to social pressures)... but it's exceedingly rare in the West these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/16 03:04 PM
4

If a guy is seriously into a woman, he shouldn't see upgrading to an LTR as "losing". Two problems with this. First, there are many shades of "seriously into", it's not an absolute threshold, and depends on your options in addition to the quality of your partner. Second, for anyone with options, it takes a fair time to get to know someone well enough for an upgrade from "solid prospect" to "seriously interested so much that it makes sense to cut off all other prospects".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/16 03:02 PM
1

If a guy is seriously into a woman, he shouldn't see upgrading to an LTR as "losing". Two problems with this. First, there are many shades of "seriously into", it's not an absolute threshold, and depends on your options in addition to the quality of your partner. Second, for anyone with options, it takes a fair time to get to know someone well enough for an upgrade from "solid prospect" to "seriously interested so much that it makes sense to cut off all other prospects".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/16 03:02 PM
2

This always puzzled me as well. I don't see one thing that a wealthy A-list celebrity has to gain by getting married. Plenty to lose, though.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:59 AM
1

This really depends on the situation. A mutually assured destruction type of situation is uncomfortable, but occasionally better than taking an outright loss.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:52 AM
6

If you go by that token, considering how much time and effort guys expand on chasing women, 5 minutes with one's hand is among the best paid gigs in the universe. Unfortunately, it's an imperfect substitute.
/r/askTRP28/05/16 03:38 PM
3

The "legalized discrimination" bit is true by definition. As for "to equalize outcomes", that is somewhat debatable. People describe the goals in either more glowing or more negative terms, depending on who you ask.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 05:32 AM
5

It's involuntary celibate, not involuntary virgin. A prolonged dry spell counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 09:27 PM
5

"The wall" is a horrible metaphor for a very gradual process.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/16 04:47 AM
8

That actually happened, in a way. The narrative of crafty exploitative Jews as long-time oppressors of honest Germans was strong.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:28 AM
18

Female privilege is the mother of all privilege. It's just not politically correct to mention it. Not being conscripted to fight wars, being rescued first in emergencies (along with children), typically easier and less dangerous work, sometimes not needing to work for a living (far more often than men)... and much more.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:22 AM
1

Speaking about quantity vs quality only makes sense if the number of your prospects is a far bit higher than one. That's simply not the case for most guys in the US, even the self proclaimed red pill ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 01:02 PM
3

Which, for many people is preferable to having standards and no results.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 08:59 AM
1

Yes, but there's no intent to cause any harm in that case. Inflicting pain and death are on a continuum, and "I wanted to hurt the victim, but stop right short of death" should not be a defense.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:01 AM
1

Of course. Just saying it's good to be realistic.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 03:08 PM
6

She'll still get laid more than 95% of the guys in their prime, if she so desires. Face it, the world is not fair, nor will it ever get fair.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 09:46 AM
10

looking forward to getting older and my dick not making me do dumb shit. Oh, the futile hopes of youth...
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 09:42 AM
38

Sounds like one of those "I just put my leg in his path, and wasn't moving when he touched me first, right before he stumbled" defenses.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:03 AM
1

It's the nature of Tinder. Most guys would happily snog a woman 3-5 points below their own looks (as long as it's not too much effort). Women who are 5 or above get plenty of interest from 9-10s and adjust expectations and estimation of their own market value in response to this. If you're below an 8 (either for real or because of poor pictures), you'll only be getting interest from women know for sure their value is sub-par and wouldn't get any interest from the top-notch guys. Because of infla…
/r/askTRP20/03/16 08:38 PM
1

Don't know about the truth, but in the US we often see the world as black and white. In many other places, some amount ambiguity is recognized as unavoidable, sometimes even valued.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 04:18 PM
5

how little they acknowledged the likelihood of getting cheated on by their wives, while in the U.S. it's getting to the point of being a funny little inside joke In East Asia there's more emphasis on face and many situations where "Maybe it happens, but I'd rather not know about it" is an common attitude.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 07:25 AM
5

Watch out. In Macedonian/Serbian/Croatian, "gubavo" means "affected by leprosy". The word you're looking for is "ubavo".
/r/askTRP07/03/16 04:13 PM
1

school's code of conduct. Is it really written to adjudicate matters between students and non-students? It's written to ensure students behave within certain moral boundaries, not only to resolve disputes. University can have lower standards of proof than the courts (in fact, if this is not the case, their proceedings are pointless, may well leave it to the courts), or to punish acts that are against certain values but not strictly breaking the law.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:47 PM
1

I strongly disagree on principle, without considering the validity of this specific case. Schools have an interest in making sure their students are upstanding community members, and follow a code of conduct more stringent than simply avoiding criminal convictions. This involves both relations with other students, and with the community at large. It only matters whether the defendant is a student (as their misbehavior reflects poorly on the school), not whether the plaintiff is. If a student was…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:42 PM
20

The whole point of TRP is laying bare the kernels of truths which are hidden by layers of social conditioning and common politeness. Of course, it's ugly and seems to lack nuance, but that's the exact purpose. Then, that kernel of truth can be again wrapped in socially acceptable layers, this time with far less confusion as to what the underlying principles are. Only an idiot would fail to do the re-wrapping when interacting with the society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:37 AM
2

There's a major difference between an occasional accident and recurring bad attitude.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/16 08:03 AM
23

If it's your child, your income is already committed, at law, to supporting this child. The Earth is a big place with varying jurisdictions/laws and a wider range of options than you imagine. Even solutions as radical as completely disappearing are not off the table, nor as difficult as they seem at first. Sure, they all have downsides, much depends on your priorities. OP's first priority was participating in his child's life... but that's not necessarily for everyone.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/15 05:21 PM
1

Why would you? The hiring company has already set a range for the potential salary they'll pay. All they need your salary info for is to give them more leverage. Why would you? They won't tell you their range, so you can't know how low or high your number is, exaggerated or not. If your number is too low they'll lowball an offer. If it's way too high (above their upper bound)... that's not necessarily to your benefit either, since they could think you'll be unhappy and likely to leave at the fir…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/15 02:58 PM
9

As a tribute of sorts, in modern days, handing out a picture of Benjamin Franklin can get one laid in many places...
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 07:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter