TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Minos_Terrible Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by Minos_Terrible on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I'm sorry the love of your life was taken by Chad with the affliction shirt and barbed wire tattoo Well, she certainly wasn't taken away by a sickly guy in a doctor's office wearing a full suit and spewing cringy one-liners, that's for sure. Seriously, how do you expect people to believe that story? The number of doctor's appointments alone is fucking crazy unless you have cancer or something.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/16 08:42 PM
14

These field reports always sound so fucking made up. "You're going to get us in trouble. See you next time." That is just cringe inducing. Next appointment, I looked really good. Fresh cut, cologne, business suit, fresh out of a big meeting. I love the completely vague reference to "big meeting." Did you have to give a "presentation" at this "big meeting"?
/r/TheRedPill22/06/16 08:38 PM
1

No. OP is projecting because he has some weird porn hangup. There is nothing wrong with porn. In terms of its health consequences - it is much safer for you than spinning a bunch of plates. If you spin plates as much as trpers pretend they do, you end up with herpes.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/16 03:49 PM
0

It is abuse of a child. A 13 year old kid is not emotionally or intellectually mature enough to handle having sex with an adult. "When I was 13, I was horny and thought about banging my hot teachers!" Right, but there is a big difference between thinking about an act and engaging in the act.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 05:29 PM
1

Many feminists try to claim that bigotry against gay men is the result of misogyny.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 10:48 PM
6

Why should other people be forced to subsidize women's choices? If a woman decides to have a child against the father's wishes, and completely on her own, why should other people be forced to pay for that choice? "My body, my choice, but somebody better help me pay for it" makes no sense and reflects an irresponsible level of entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 04:30 PM
1

This is fake, and the girl is trying to humblebrag. Look at the handwriting on the tip. That is a woman's handwriting.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:47 PM
2

She wasn't mad at being deleted and blocked. She was mad at the "haha ok."
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 02:41 PM
1

If a man were allowed to force a woman to give birth, that would be unfair to the woman and a violation of her personal autonomy. The same is true with respect to women forcing men into fatherhood responsibilities. Any argument you can make that men should be forced to pay child support will be equally applicable to forcing a woman to give birth against her will.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 03:35 PM
1

I'm not saying men are evil for this, just that it's not their first choice but it IS women's first choice. I agree (with respect to women approaching 30) The conclusions you draw from this fact, however, are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 06:01 PM
3

Men have high sex drives, and their instinct is to seek sexual variety. However, men are also emotional beings. And most men dont have "sexual variety" as an option. You seem to think the choice is between long term relationship, or fuck a bunch of different women. For a lot of men, we go through significant periods where no women are interested in us whatsoever for either.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 05:51 PM
4

Men do not want relationships far less than women do. Men just fear marriage because marriage is a terrible deal for men. You are confusing the fact that men are more comfortable being alone with men's preferences. The reality is men become comfortable being alone because they get used to not receiving attention from women. Women get used to receiving male attention, and get used to frequent dating relationships to the point where if they are single for a few months, they panic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 05:35 PM
2

Yes. I understand how easy it is to commingle assets. You would need to give me examples of individual cases. Most of the guys who end up extremely fucked didnt have a prenup. Mel Gibson - no prenup. Kobe Bryant - no prenup. Paul McCartney - no prenup.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 05:22 PM
2

As a default, sure. But you can agree around the default rule. In community property states, for example, you can agree to keep your property separate. As long as you dont commingle your assets, that agreement should hold, even for property acquired during marriage (assuming it was drafted correctly)
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 04:50 PM
3

You are wrong. You can keep money earned during the marriage separate. Talk to a lawyer if interested.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 03:41 PM
3

Can't win everyone over ;) The only people you could possibly win over with what you have typed are morons who have never actually been involved in the business world. The thing is, I'm not going to list everything in detail for obvious reasons. No need for everything in detail. Anything beyond vague platitudes would have lent credibility to your post.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 05:21 PM
3

He called writing 5000 words a day "back breaking work," gave completely vague "advice," and then lashed out at anyone who expressed doubts about his story. He stated his business was ad-based, and when people started questioning him on the specifics of his ad revenue model, he responded by stating that he was in gambling. Which is just an ambiguous shifting of the goalposts that means nothing. So, forgive me for not believing an incredibly vague story that sounds almost exactly like the same cr…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 04:11 PM
7

He is full of shit. He is doing that Google Adsense crap (or something similar). Calling what he is doing "starting a business" is stupid. He spams ads on dead domains and (if he is lucky) pulls in about $50 a day. Source: My younger brother tried doing the same thing. He uses the same delusional language too. Refers to it as his "online business." It's crazy. These types of things target the dumb and lazy. The OP (like my younger brother) wanted to make a lot of money sitting on his couch all d…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/16 03:42 PM
1

All I have to go on is the budgeted numbers for the upcoming year. And that is a purposefully limited and skewed data set. And even with that skewed data set, the increased revenue for the women's team is a result of having more games scheduled. On a per-game basis, the men still draw more revenue. That should tell you something about the economic viability of each game. In the year immediately following the women's championship - they still draw less in revenue per game than the men, who are no…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:42 PM
1

They would have a case if what they were seeking was a one year contract compared to a one year contract for the men. But that isn't the deal. These contracts are longer term than that. They are trying to use outliers (a world championshil year and the spike in interest in the following short term) to subsidize the following years where they will inevitably struggle in terms of revenue.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:26 PM
2

So, the men's per game revenue projects to be slightly more than the women's in the year immediately following a championship for the women, and you believe this justifies paying the women more for a long-term contract?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 05:40 PM
2

2015 was a world cup year for the women and not for the men.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 05:27 PM
11

Men's soccer is consistently more popular than women's. However, the women's recent championship match generated a lot of revenue. That is the origin of the revenue claim. They are arguing "our world cup year drew more money than the men's non world cup year, therefore we deserve more money even in non world cup years."
/r/MensRights31/03/16 05:22 PM
8

A lot of feminist arguments are "men should change the world to suit women." The idea that women should change their behavior to adapt to the world often offends feminists. Rape advocacy provides good examples of that idea. Rape is a very tough crime to prosecute. Prompt reporting is crucial. Rape victims sometimes fail to report the crime immediately for a variety of reasons. Feminists balk at any message that rape victims should report their crimes immediately and instead insist that the justi…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:42 PM
3

Pretty sure it's a joke. Lighten up.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 12:31 AM
3

I agree with most of that to an extent. I will, however, say that you are severely underestimating the emotional toll abortion takes on potential fathers. This is particularly true when the father actually wants the child, and views abortion as akin to murder. But how does any of what you just said imply that a unilateral choice by one person should dictate another person's entire life? "Abortion is a difficult choice to make, therefore you, the unwilling father, should have to support the child…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:41 PM
1

This is likely due to the sample being biased. Men who are awarded sole custody are likely to be better parents overall. With how biased family courts are, for a guy to get primary custody, he likely has to go above and beyond. That biases the sample.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:04 PM
8

If a woman has the unilateral authority to decide whether a child exists, then it stands to reason that she should be solely responsible for the result of that choice. It makes no logical sense to hold an unwilling father responsible for choices an individual woman made unilaterally.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:02 PM
81

Or Greg Oden. A girl leaked nude photos of him. Huffington Post ran a piece inviting readers to rate his penis. Ultimately, Greg Oden issued a public apology. Someone else violates your privacy and trust and you are forced to apologize. Just another shining example of "male privilege."
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:17 PM
41

Your philosophy professor is dumb. Those arent double standards, those are just opposite extremes. You can come up with tons of examples for men. If a man is very successful with women he is a "womanizer," a "cad," a "player." If he is unsuccessful, he is a loser. If a man spends lots of his time at work, he is a "workaholic" - if he does not, he is a bum. If a man is very muscular and in shape he may be viewed as a "meathead jock" - if he is not in shape he will be viewed as a wuss. If a man cr…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 05:50 PM
5

Also, there are going to be far fewer (if any) women being tortured. But the atrocities line is wrong. Women have participated in atrocities throughout history. And even if they dont directly participate, it's not like they do anything to stop them. Do you really think the women of Nazi Germany silently opposed Hitler?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 09:16 PM
3

The reason they think that is because that is what virtually every woman in their life told them. There isnt a mass collection of men claiming "men dont care about looks - all men really want is a girl with a great personality."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 09:50 PM
1

There are plenty of studies reflecting that women value a man's income when choosing a boyfriend/husband. There are also studies that show women resent husbands who do not earn enough to allow the wife to stay home. Finally, there are plenty of studies that show women tend to prioritize job satisfaction and non wage benefits when choosing a career. One does not have to be psychic to put two and two together.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:27 PM
44

Nah. Even if men were provided with paternity leave - you are not going to get women to prefer going back to work full time after having kids. You also are not going to get women to stop preferring men to provide for them. You wont "solve" the wage gap until you get women to stop caring how much money men earn, or get men to start caring how much money women earn. Until either of those things happen, the incentives facing each gender will continue to he fundamentally different.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:58 PM
15

It's not alimony - it's community property. In Arizona (and other community property states) all money earned and property acquired during the marriage is considered to be owned 50/50 by the married couple. So, upon a divorce, the husband takes "his" half and the wife takes "her" half.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 03:20 PM
3

How does this example contradict anything the red pill says? She married a man who has higher status and more money than she does. He married a woman almost two decades younger than him. If the high-status female lawyer marries an auto mechanic - THAT is an example that would contradict the rp narrative. But your point seems to be "George Clooney married a woman 20 years younger than him instead of 40 years younger, therefore men dont care about youth and attractiveness in women." If thats your …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 11:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter