TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mirrormn Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by Mirrormn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

Yes, that's extremely easy to explain. Business Insider asked him for comment regarding the accusation. He wrote them back saying "give me more time to write a response". Then, a few hours later, he tweeted that he was switching parties, and "predicted" that he would be attacked as a result. In other words, he wasn't accused in retaliation for any political agenda. Instead, he intentionally set up a political framing for a story he already knew was about to be published.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 07:57 PM
1

I don't think "not doing work" was less inconvenient back then, people just have more resources to be hypocritical nowadays.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 03:21 AM
-3

Nah. I would've looked it up to pretend like I did, though.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:39 AM
2

Here's a recent article by the same publication that uses the same kind of language referring to a man. The reason is because both of these news articles are based on indictments, and indictments allege things. That's just the proper and most accurate term for what they do. If a news article is written because of a police arrest on the scene of a crime, they can write "so and so was arrested for x" instead of putting "alleged" all over the place. The difference is really entirely because of the …
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:23 AM
-7

I like how thoroughly you undermined your own point by saying "the guys who invented a drug for treating AIDS" instead of naming someone. You don't know who they are either. The fact is, developing antiretroviral therapies for AIDS treatment is important, but not entertaining in the slightest. Not to you, me, or the people who "glamorize trashy criminals". None of us are all that different in that respect.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:07 AM
3

That's just childishness. Millenials were making those same jokes when they were younger.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 03:17 PM
7

How about conspiracy to commit fraud, then?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:23 PM
-2

No, Kavanaugh.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:21 PM
2

Seven FBI investigations isn't proper to you? 0 investigations, 7 background checks. Only 1 background check was performed after the allegations were even known, and it was actively interfered with to ensure that it couldn't return anything inciminating. If you seriously believe the "seven investigations" talking point, you either have no idea of the actual facts, or are intentionally trying to find a way not to have to think about them.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:02 PM
-13

people like this love to sit in an echo chamber where all rape accusations should automatically mean that the accused is immediately stripped of all livelihood without due process or evidence That's one of the biggest strawmen I've ever seen. Kavanaugh's accusations were not taken seriously, and that's exactly what cries of "believe women" are mad about. You have to create a false alternate reality where everyone - not just the craziest, most vocal 0.01% of malcontents - wants people thrown in j…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:49 PM
-34

if he said “Mrs. Jones raped me”, we need to prove that before we fire Mrs. Jones, or use that as a basis for preventing from becoming superintendent. If you actually believed this, you would have opposed the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh, whose alleged misdeeds were not properly investigated and instead deliberately covered up by friends in the highest echelons of government.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:20 PM
-13

This sub applies a very glaring double standard to believing victims of abuse. It's radical third wave feminism with "male" find/replaced with "female" and vice versa. This post is basically the definition of a #MeToo sentiment, so why are we not rabble-rousing about false accusations, like every thread about #MeToo? It's because this sub believes men by default and disbelieves women by default, while choosing different connotations of the word "believe" in different circumstances to defend this…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:14 PM
-58

Can you imagine if people talking about trauma from their past were dismissed with "you're a false accuser" and "your abuser is innocent until proven guilty"?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:16 PM
4

Kavanaugh is unqualified for his Supreme Court seat because of poor temperament and partisanship, not lack of intelligence. He's not stupid enough to think he could win a defamation/slander case. The facts are completely against him. Indeed, he may even be impeached for perjury at some point in the future.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:59 AM
1

Kavanaugh was more directly exposed as a fraud by lying about his drinking habits and playing "Devil's Triangle", but you won't see /r/MensRights jumping all over that.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:59 PM
1

In this case, I think the term "silence" is supposed to refer to people categorically disagreeing with them and ignoring them, and trying to convince others to do the same, without honestly considering the weight of their arguments and messages, or even knowing specifically what they are. Which, ironically, seems to be exactly what you're doing. Shrug, I don't really know anything about this particular women, either. I just wanted to point out the painful stupidity of the non-existent hypocrisy …
/r/MensRights30/01/18 09:26 AM
3

This doesn't really even need to be an inherently pro-male sexist counterargument, like you're making it out. Getting rid of men would be disastrous simply because you can't eliminate 50% of the human population without dire consequences, regardless of what criteria you use to identify them. That may sound needlessly reductive, but it highlights the fact that most men are simply people, which is something that extreme feminists seem to forget (or intentionally ignore).
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:34 AM
8

ITT: People who do not understand subjunctives. She is not saying she is being currently silenced.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 07:47 PM
3

I understand the difference, I just thought we were having a competition to come up with the stupidest thing to suggest should be counted in domestic violence statistics.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:15 AM
4

Killing those same kids by masturbating into a tissue and killing the sperm isn't counted either :( It's really frustrating seeing this kind of blatant bias when literally billions of lives are dying.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 04:52 AM
29

I'm seeing e.g. 22% of Architects are female - do we just not care about them? Deliberately ignoring them to make a point? Hell, even the 3% of "Construction trades" workers who are female don't deserve to be discounted like this.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:13 PM
1

Why is that a problem? You know comparing two things doesn't mean that they're literally the same in every way, right?
/r/MensRights22/04/16 05:28 PM
-4

This is an interesting observation, and I can definitely see some parallels, but I think it is worth pointing out, before anyone gets carried away: rape is actually a real thing that happens, whereas being a witch is not.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:23 AM
4

I find your opinion horrifically insensitive and biased, but I'm upvoting you because I appreciate that you laid it out explicitly and clearly.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:40 AM
3

What really baffles me is that if you downvote every comment in a thread, then all the comments retain the same ordering relative to each other. Since the entire point of comment karma is to ensure that higher-quality comments receive priority in ordering, downvoting everything is quite literally pointless.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 12:36 AM
2

Mandatory paternity testing for all fathers is unnecessary, and could probably be ruled unconstitutional as a an invasion of privacy ("The right of the people to be secure in their persons"). However, father-child-mother testing should absolutely be a mandatory part of the proceedings of any parenthood-based court cases (e.g. child support). I'm actually kind of baffled that that is not already the case.
/r/MensRights20/09/10 10:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter