TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Misogynist002 Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by Misogynist002 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I agree with some of what you're saying but you're presuming way too much about my motives.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:20 PM
41

Yes. There have been other cases where males have been accused by several females who have been found not guilty where I sided with the male because the investigation, it would be dishonest to not do the same here. The investigators had the info we have plus a lot more. I really hate the courts of social justice which is where she's being tried here. It's ruined innocent mens lives as well.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 03:13 PM
31

I'm inclined to go with the investigation given the scant details on the case. The only frustrating part of this case is just the accusations alone would be enough to get a male facility removed
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:38 PM
2

Pls be a troll
/r/MensRights11/05/16 02:49 PM
6

But what about the wymen?! But seriously gtfo with that garbage, femanists get all butthurt when men pull this shit so dont go doing it yourself.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 02:04 AM
0

You are the most dense person ive ever met.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 02:19 PM
0

Of course she was convicted she murdered her two girls in cold blood. This says nothing about the guy. Are you being intentionally thick for some reason?
/r/MensRights01/05/16 06:54 AM
0

If you can't tell the difference between "there's no evidence currently but it's under investigation" and "her claims were false", you might be living in an echo chamber
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:43 AM
2

You're literally going with the tumblrina "ITS NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE YOU" response. If there was another source confirming she was lying and the investigation was closed you should have linked that instead of abridging this one. You're disgusting.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:35 AM
0

I dont want to take away from this horrible crime and what she did was completely inexcusable no matter what the truth is, but nowhere in the article did it say he wasnt molesting them. It specifically said the investigation was still ongoing. It sickens me you intentionally altered the title for more upvotes
/r/MensRights01/05/16 12:38 AM
-1

Lol rfta. Fuck off "atheist101", what a joke.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:41 PM
6

This is legitimately enraging for me. My local needle exchange helped keep me from making stupid decisions and may have even saved my life. Now im doing research in an engineering lab as i finish my degree, opportunities i may have never had if not for the exchange. Fuck these cuck faggots.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:12 PM
-1

Women are actually at considerably higher risk at getting stds from sex on a per session basis. I think that might be their logic but its completely irrelevant here considering its about needles being shared
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:09 PM
4

Did you really just say evidence based thinking is "guessing"? I dont see any reason to continue this conversation.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 10:28 PM
2

This isnt science its philosophy. We do the best with what we have, if we follow your logic we should just ignore science because we can never truely be sure on anything. Personally i'm happy to be in a comfortable bed in a house instead of huddled around a fire in a cave.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:03 PM
1

Statements like that are so idiotic they should simply be ignored.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 07:59 PM
9

But wat abouut de womyns?! Fuck off, the title literally says the beauty standards effect us both.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 03:20 AM
-1

There was a 0% chance of her getting life. When i got arrested it was possible to get up to 20 years in prison and I spent a night in jail and had to pay some fines. Journalists just give max sentances in their articles to sensationalize their articles. Also, the article was terrible and never mentioned why the charges were dropped. If they had no proof and knew she would walk free id rather her get charged for something
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:42 PM
6

It should be removed entirely. I was totally on board till then. The whole point of the post was "women don't actually make less than men it's an issue with deep complexities" then the last line was "here's an out of context statistic that's just as bad as the 77 cents on the dollar one!"
/r/MensRights27/02/16 01:17 AM
3

Wait what?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:04 PM
-3

This sub is full of fucking retards
/r/MensRights10/02/16 11:24 PM
-6

you couldn't make this up 7 CRAZY facts, you wouldn't believe #4! Fuck off with the editorialized title you just make us look like idiots.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 08:42 PM
2

I was raised by a physically and mentally abusive mother. I'll never feel comfortable with any sort of physical contact with anyone other than my GF because of it, and even with her I have issues with contact. I even feel uncomfortable being physically close to family. Definitely had intense mental effects.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:18 AM
1

Holy shit everything about that guy is annoying
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:15 AM
2

Examples of this happening?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:08 AM
1

Let me first say women getting accepted to tech schools at much higher rates might truly be about gender. What im saying is the information you presented does absolutely nothing to prove that. Comparing students applying to the worlds best tech schools to a national average is silly at best. I know what a standard deviation is and im assuming you have at least some stats knowlege so you should know better than to compare those two groups.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 08:08 AM
2

Id be interested to see actual data on this instead of you knowing a guy. I will deep fry and eat my shoe if the women arent statistically more qualified than the men applying.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:27 AM
7

Is everyone really just going to accept this at face value? This is almost as bad as some of those dv infographics femanist groups put out. Remember guys, correlation does not equal causation, data without context is meaningless and trying to give it meaning is manipulative. Other people can probably think of better reasons than I can for a skew like that but i would argue theres a high probability that the male applicants are less qualified than the female applicants due to social pressure for …
/r/MensRights18/01/16 08:31 PM
1

Him having different views on two totally seperate issues isnt at all confusing.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:17 PM
-3

Anecdotes can be useful if the situation is unique. Im assuming you dont have an education in a field where its relevant if you don't know this. I asked for a single counter example not a body of evidence. But if youre going that route, yes, there is a ton of data showing women get lighter sentences for similar crimes. Edit: im saddened by the fact that a single counter example couldnt be found but people are happy to downvote me without presenting evidence. Yeah, im the one circlejerking here.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:57 AM
-4

If youre going to "call out peoples bs", try not being such a condescending cunt. Youll yield better results. That said, i looked around a bit and wasnt able to find a single case under similar circumstances where a man wasnt arrested for killing someone. Please, find me one and i'll conceed your point. Make sure the circumstances are similar, its important.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:28 AM
-8

It was a shitty analogy on two totally different levels. Youre acting like they were playing russian roulette and he was the unlucky one. The article gave little details but it seems like she was in possession of the gun when he got shot. Criminal negligence is a thing. This is 100% a case of getting a pussy pass.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:19 AM
3

This isn't two kids dicking around with roman candles. This is someone that killed someone with a gun.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:07 AM
7

Wait, did you just say she shouldnt go to jail for being so irresponsible she killed someone? Or am i misunderstanding?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:07 PM
5

He's got a good point though, if a femanist group boycotted something theyd be empowered. Nothing wrong with the boycott itself, but the mocking tone and obvious bias is what makes it a terrible article. Totally unrelated but a lot of comments ITT really are being whiney bitches. Yes they did some pandering but they did in the original as well, chill out and let yourself enjoy things.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 12:14 AM
4

Because I'm too young to know what I want.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 07:26 AM
18

I really enjoy signing up for the draft and being unable to find a doctor to perform a vasectomy at age 26. I have so much control over my body!
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:09 PM
5

Yeah i'm super confused at why this could possibly be an issue. I buy lady body wash because i like the smell better, does the labeling somehow prevent these people from buying it?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 02:00 AM
-7

Yeah shit like this is why the rest of reddit views MRAs as whiny misogynists.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:50 PM
7

Republicans have very much been on this side of the issue since it started becoming mainstream. It's one of the reasons (outside of reddit of course) republicans are seeing more youth votes.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 03:53 AM
9

Fucking rage. In the vast majority of cases women are meaner to eachother than men will ever be, especially in highschool. We get it, bullying and sexual assault is a problem, but trying to make boys and men out to be the bad guys is sexist and runs counter to their goals.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 08:18 PM
3

Yeah this worries me a lot. Comes across as religious politicians trying to make abortions as hard as possible under the guise of mens rights. Making false rape accusations have an incentive seems like an awful idea.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 08:08 PM
-7

This may be the biggest circlejerk ive ever seen. Theres some good posts here but if you believe this sub isnt an echo chamber youve been bamboozled.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:25 PM
-1

Ah college humor, also my source of scientific information. I really liked the part where he mentions a reduced risk for hiv like it was no big deal.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:33 AM
-4

I see her as a victim. Its fucking absurd that she got 5 years for having sex with peoole who are of age. She should have been fired and never allowed to teach again but 5 years in prison? Fuck you texas.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:02 PM
-7

Dude female circumcision prevents them from enjoying sex and is actual abuse. Male circumcision is usually done for health reasons and isnt harmful. I'm as MRA as anyone but dont be ignorant.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:27 PM
3

So the 1/6 number is obviously fully fucking retarded (I can't believe people still believe this) and basically calling all men predators is also retarded, but the 100 million sharks/year number is what stuck out the most to me. This 'inforgraphic' got the number right but it's not because of threats to humans, it's just fishing, usually for their fins. So, not only are they lying about rape they're also lying with the narrative they try to set up using sharks as a comparison. But damn, that's a…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:01 PM
-2

So we'll just ruin a mans life and call it good!
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:14 AM
-7

Yeah no shit but girls mature at wildly different rates. It is very reasonable to assume a 14 year old is legal, especially as a horny 18 year old.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter