TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MissCherryPi Archive

View 5 posts and 154 comments by MissCherryPi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If she wants you she will give you her number and respond to your calls and texts when she’s sober the next day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 07:49 PM
3

Radfems: Our culture's definition of masculinity is toxic. It means men don't see sex with women as loving or fun, they think they are dominating and degrading you. TRP: AWALT. Women need to be dominated. Me: Well it seems like TRPs confirm what Radfems have been saying!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 02:06 PM
6

Because they talk about sex the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:47 PM
3

Men have a higher chance of being raped than of being falsely accused of rape. I think your concerns are in the wrong place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 11:59 AM
2

Are women people?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:04 AM
1

What do you mean by "just friends?" Can people who are attracted to each other choose not to have sex but instead have a platonic friendship? Yes. I don't believe that attraction nullifies a friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:28 PM
1

Isn't jailing them the best prevention? Helped significantly bring down other crime. Do you have evidence for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:20 PM
6

It would depend on what he said. If he said "I got drunk and Jane took advantage of me." I would think it was rape. If he said "I told Jane to blow me because I was drunk." I would think it was cheating. The key is: still awake and still forming sentences If the sentences are coherent, then it's not rape. If a person can both communicate their desires and understand communication from other people I don't think they are too drunk to consent. Read this for more info.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:10 PM
1

41% of Jezebel readers say they'd have sex with Martin O'Malley.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 05:12 PM
1

IDK. I thought the Beta was the guy that gets dumped - Bill Pullman in "Sleepless in Seattle," Sam Neill in "The Horse Whisperer," Ben Affleck in "Reality Bites."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 03:10 PM
1

Thanks for another example of how anti-feminism is an appeal to force.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 06:12 PM
1

It's just a question of what you think is worse, cheating or divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 05:53 PM
2

20 years old is really young. I bet a lot of people on TBP are or were virgins at 20. There's nothing wrong with that. What BP's got to understand is that when you tell us it's the wrong choice to change your look, personality and life for pussy, you're saying that we should instead simply accept our rank and place in a system where we are objectively inferior. I think you are misunderstanding. Wanting to be the best person you can be to get laid is fine. Lifting weights is one of my favorite ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 02:27 PM
2

The people in my life who have told me I could do anything or be anything have been feminists. Those who told me that I should be quiet or weak or complacent have been antifeminist and more concerned with people staying within strict gender roles than having a good quality of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 03:57 PM
3

Women are natural followers and have no real worth beyond child rearing and keeping the house clean and tidy. Seems like TRPs are the ones who want women to be dependent on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 02:02 PM
1

Please show links regarding feminism tackling societal consumption of men. Code Pink.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 04:25 PM
1

Either "AWALT" or "it's a spectrum" and "all people are different." These are contradictory ideas. The can't both be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 02:02 PM
1

So all women are not like that? Hmm...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 01:02 PM
3

Maybe you can suck my dick. No thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 04:26 PM
2

So maybe use real science then and not a just-so story?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 04:00 PM
4

And my point is that people often try to use examples from nature to make political points and these examples are rarely backed up by evidence so it's intellectually dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 03:41 PM
1

Would you leave your man if someone more alpha was hitting on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 03:21 PM
2

cuckolding the males of their group. Half were in group and half were out group. That's not cuckolding and it's not "one bad chimp gets to mate and the others are punks."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 03:20 PM
0

In the animal kingdom only one bad chimp or lion gets to mate the others are punks. We used to think that. But not really. Pedigree relationships in that community show that female mate choice strategies are more variable than previously supposed and that the observed social groups are not the exclusive reproductive units. Genetic evidence based on nuclear microsatellite markers and behavioural obser-vations reveal that females in the Taı̈ forest actively seek mating partners outside their socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 02:52 PM
3

Should we shame employers for not paying living wages? Parents need money to raise children.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 02:47 PM
1

So if she should only have the kind of sex she likes and feels comfortable with, what is the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 07:47 PM
1

So you disagree with the premise of this thread? You think alimony is fair in some circumstances?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 06:34 PM
1

And in that scenario, what would happen to a woman if her husband left her for a younger woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 06:23 PM
0

She knew from the first couple times she didn’t like doing certain things, yet she kept doing them because of the chance of commitment. With OP, she knew that she doesn’t need to go out of her comfort zone to keep him. So you want to be having sex with a woman who is uncomfortable having that kind of sex and does not like it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 06:12 PM
2

Yes that's the point. I'm 32. Since we were children we were aware sex could be deadly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 10:06 PM
1

What resources?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 07:41 PM
2

I think it has to do with awareness of AIDS/HIV.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 07:23 PM
1

Not according to Roissy!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 04:47 PM
29

They think that human beings are fruit flies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 02:00 PM
1

ok I fixed the link.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 08:10 PM
1

People can't answer this question. Here's what happened when I tried.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 08:08 PM
-1

pooping everywhere I don't think this is the scat forum.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 08:03 PM
1

It's based on this article. Both have this statement: If women were more fully in charge of how their relationships transpired, we’d be seeing, on average, more impressive wooing efforts, longer relationships, fewer premarital sexual partners, shorter cohabitations, and more marrying going on. But this isn't quantified. Wouldn't the trend of huge public flash mob proposals be an example of impressive wooing efforts? Isn't cohabitation (also on the rise) something that happens in long term relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 06:00 PM
4

Red Pillers frequently say that those "other positive qualities" are meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 06:25 PM
4

Where did you get this notion that men would marry women who simply look good and nothing else? The Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 06:12 PM
2

Right, but if the only reason they married them was beauty and fertility, why should they stay married? You are saying it's because they are in love. But that kind of love requires emotional compatibility, shared experience, common values and interests. None of these things have to do with beauty or fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 05:18 PM
4

Good question! I got banned from RPW for asking the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 05:17 PM
3

if he got her when she was most attractive, she also deserves that he sticks to her when she is at her least attractive. Isn't that just female entitlement? Why does she deserve it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 05:13 PM
3

Yes and it contradicts the red pill "truth" that: Women are depreciating assets, their major asset and unique selling point is their sexual beauty and fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 05:10 PM
2

But wouldn't men who didn't have wife goggles have more children?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 05:07 PM
3

Yes, but a man does not have to stay married or faithful to a woman to make sure she cares for his grandchildren. There are plenty of divorced or widowed grandmas who help out.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/14 05:04 PM
1

Many people are polyamorous, so I think this invalidates your argument - there are straight men and women who don't mind their partner having other partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/14 05:11 PM
5

sauce?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/14 05:04 PM
2

Teenagers having sex with each other is different than them having sex with adults. Teenagers are immature and easily taken advantage of. When dealing with people their own age, there's more of a level playing field. The power dynamic when an adult is "dating" a teenager can easily be exploitative and abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/14 03:04 PM
1

He doesn't trust her fidelity and is hoping to catch her cheating (and trying to manipulate him into the next steps via pregnancy), then pull out the sterility card while laughing at her cheating ass then posting the story on the internet. He's afraid that disclosing his sterility would help her get away with cheating. Yes, this is what the OP was hoping for. He wanted a thread of lolz Yes! Because then I couldn't hamster my way into trapping him with a pregnancy from alpha cockz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/14 03:47 PM
2

Any hot 18-year old woman could have sex with almost any single man she could possibly ever want and probably a lot of the married ones, too. The major exception would be very religious men with strong beliefs about sex before marriage and honestly a lot of them would probably still stick it in and say a mea culpa later. Honor is a male abstraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 01:01 PM
2

I believe people are misinterpreting correlation for causation. I think in these cases, it is likely that there is one factor impacting the woman like illness or a demanding job that is causing both the man to do more housework and the woman to desire less sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/14 07:04 PM
8

So wouldn't it be irrational to be scared of men walking down the street? It depends how the men walking down the street are acting, and frankly, on the past experience of the woman walking. Most rapists choose a victim from among the people they know. Most is not all. Isn't that what YesAllWomen is about? "Yes all women" is a response to "not all men." As in: Not all men are harassers/abusers but yes all women experience sexism and most experience at least some harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 06:15 PM
1

Here's my comment when this article was first published: I don't understand how women criticizing #FemFuture ruined it. Why didn't Martin et. al engage in good faith and continue? I suppose it's easy for me to say because I'm not the one who organized a conference to talk about the future of feminism and then got called a racist by a lot of people on Twitter, but I think if you want to be an ally you must be able to take constructive criticism. If you remember, this happened a few years ago with…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 02:48 PM
3

What happens if it's mutual, like both people were cheating and when it was discovered they realized their relationship was over? Or if one person cheated and then the other one became physically abusive in response?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 02:26 PM
26

Most rapists are young men. Most women who are raped are raped by someone they know. Young men know more women their own age than women much older than them. Edit - spelling
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 02:01 PM
10

One thing that distinguishes us from other animals is our ability to think logically. If you say women cannot think logically, you dehumanize them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 04:08 PM
8

This makes women seem like animals and not people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 03:45 PM
9

"Women are irrational and inconsistent, they have a capacity for logic but it is not their modus operandi, that is to say that they must exert effort to be logical as it is not their factory setting. A logical woman is easily baited into becoming emotional; women are easy to compromise. Their decisions are based on their current emotional state rather than the abstraction of logic. It's this proclivity to change so quickly which causes them to act inconsistently and in contradiction. " That soun…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 03:33 PM
9

"competence at social interaction" Has nothing to do with believing women are stupid and need to be dominated. I know plenty of feminist or egalitarian men who are fun to be around and have no problem getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 03:17 PM
12

It depends what they were doing beforehand. I think most of the time it's a numbers game. If a guy wasn't approaching women before and now he is of course he's going to have a higher success rate than when he wasn't interacting with women. I know a guy who went to a therapist about social anxiety and it was his "homework" to approach a woman every day and just say hello and ask if she knew what time it was. Within a few weeks he had a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 03:03 PM
2

In this model of marriage, a woman's place is entirely to serve a man. If that's what you want, just say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 12:37 PM
1

No, because if you want to marry a guy who can support at stay at home mom, he can't be in his early 20's. Most likely she married an older guy. So he's retiring now too. And so she can spend her late 40's and 50's taking care of an old man who will die when she needs more help. Hope the kids didn't move too far away! John Ross wrote about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/14 04:58 PM
3

What can I do to make my daughter more comfortable with my new relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 06:50 PM
10

What if your mom was banging your friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 03:07 PM
3

The first link is a thread from a red pill sub. The second link is to a question someone wrote in to an advice column. The man who asked the red pill said his daughter was OK with him dating her friends. The man who wrote in to Dan Savage is concerned because his daughter seems to not be okay with it. I want to know what Red Pill people would tell him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 02:58 PM
1

women are just playing along these games because they like drama too much and like the dick anyway so they let men get the satisfaction of being apologized to and being chased after. DING DING DING. We have a winner!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/14 03:59 PM
1

If somebody believes in god (red pill), who are you to tell them that god doesn't exist. Because the Red Pill, like religion makes factual claims which may be true or false.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/14 03:51 PM
2

Ok, so you admit that TRP encourages men to be abusive, controlling, asshole, jerks who women find it dissatysfying to be in a relationship with? Sweet.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/14 03:40 PM
1

The Last Psychiatrist: When is it OK to rape a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/14 03:28 PM
1

I could listen to Christopher Ryan talk for hours. But his choice of guests is highly questionable. He had on Neil Strauss for his first episode. He had on Jaiya Ma - while I appreciate her sex positivity, I don't like how she blurs New Age woo with actual science. His guests are always interesting though, even if they are narssicistic or wrong headed. ...And the whole Sex Nerd Sondra thing. oh my god. I tried to listen to her podcast, but the SECOND time she asked a doctor if men could take bir…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 02:57 PM
1

I've read a lot about Sex at Dusk, and I can admit that S@D probably isn't perfect. Still, it's a good thought experiment and a challenge to the status quo. Many, if not most people are bad at monogamy and he's attempting to find out why that is. I've listened to Ryan's podcast and he's a bit... out there. He has people on that clearly have no grasp of what science is, and that disturbs me. But he's always very clear that although monogamy isn't for everyone, neither is being poly and people nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 01:21 PM
4

Here's an interview with Ruth Bader Ginsburg from 2009 on why she felt SCOTUS needs more than one woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/14 01:12 PM
5

Even the women I know who love being stay at home moms, (including my own mother when I was young) have other interests and goals. They talk about being bored out of their minds after playing the same repetitive games with toddlers all day. Or needing an adult to talk to. So they do volunteer work, or part time paid work, start their own business from home, pursue creative outlets, etc. I know of no women who spend 100% of their time on their children. So, it's not that I look down on SAHMs, it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 05:05 PM
0

the "Sex at Dawn" argument claims that we are bonobos so we should have sex like them. No. There are no "shoulds" in S@D. At all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 01:40 PM
2

We started enforcing monogamy when we started parceling out property. Before agriculture, paternity wasn't as important. No land, no heirs, nbd.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 12:33 AM
3

Edit: wait, what? The post you linked to has nothing whatsoever to do with your post. Does it matter it was about a different concept? I thought all Red Pill ideas applied to all straight men and women. Also, upvoted you for an honest answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 05:55 PM
3

I'm not offended when something clearly doesn't apply to me. But, AWALT!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 05:42 PM
2

Because this is a debate sub, and you just said AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 05:39 PM
0

More answers from Red Pill Women when I asked a similar question.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/14 07:21 PM
6

Wouldn't they consider that information extra relevant, since they think that gender defines a person? That's assuming you believe they think women are people, and not objects.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/14 07:16 PM
0

Then my argument is that I think people's behaviors and motivations are not described accurately with the math problem you describe.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/14 06:17 PM
1

Hyper majority of the time it is the men proposing though If you are talking about getting down on one knee with a ring, yeah sure. But it's misleading to pretend that's all that counts when making the decision to get married. I don't know anyone who was completely surprised by a proposal. Most of the time the couple talks about it first, and I think women often initiate conversations about marriage, commitment, etc. I hope we can move past talking about dehumanization though. That wasn't the in…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/14 04:05 PM
3

I wrote this a while ago, it's about how TRP embodies views about sex that some sex-critical radical feminists say our whole culture has.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/14 03:45 PM
2

I'm not so sure that men are always "initiators" and women are always "reviewers." Most people do both. How do the men decide which women to ask out? They are reviewing the women they know. Women often flirt, dress up, drop hints, show "indicators of interest" to promt a man. That is a kind of initiating. Also, it dehumanizing as hell to talk about intimate relationships this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/14 03:32 PM
10

This one was deleted. The OP was about how because some homphobes are secretly gay, feminists want to be raped by red pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 09:07 PM
1

31, woman, married, allergic to cats, Blue Pill. I do agree that the demographics of the subs are different, but that's irrelevant because TRP presents itself as a universal truth applying to all heterosexual people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 03:39 PM
8

Research published in American Economic Review suggests the use of blind auditions also changed the role that gender apparently plays during auditions. According to a 2001 study by Cecilia Rouse of Princeton and Claudia Goldin of Harvard, the introduction of blind auditions to American symphony orchestras increased the probability that a woman would advance from preliminary rounds by 50 percent. According to the study, among those symphonies, "about 10 percent of orchestra members were female ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 03:32 PM
2

Who said rape could be educated into extinction? I didn't say that. No one said that? I am pretty sure that, like, no one has ever said that ever. At least no one anyone takes seriously. How about Steven Pinker? Humanity as a whole has gotten less violent over time. Wars that killed significant proportions of our population, used to be far more common. As did slavery, torture and capital punishment. I would expect that rape has declined over the centuries and will continue to decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 02:05 PM
2

Feminists need something to crusade against. No. It would be really nice if sexism didn't exist anymore and we could work on other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/14 03:41 PM
1

Narcissism 2.2 Machiavellianism 2 Psychopathy 1.1
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 05:23 PM
3

I got a 12. I think I'm cute, and I don't like playing games. I was never a clubbing type, I met my husband young and we are happily married. I don't know what this test is measuring because even though I scored low, I have few problems in my relationship and we hardly ever fight. If I have such low emotional intelligence, I would think there would be more turmoil.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 05:17 PM
3

As someone who has been part of the Manosphere and now slowing drifting mainstream, I have a rather disappointing realization. The core problem in the relationship is almost always the mans fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/14 10:12 PM
8

So I just went back and read the post you are talking about, and I don't think that divorce is always the man's fault. That's sexist nonsense. This whole idea that women can be trained dogs, or programmed like robots (and that's what AK is saying, if you train/program your wife right she won't leave you), it's dehumanizing. I can see why some men like this idea though, that if you follow all the right steps you will have a secure relationship forever, it's comforting. The Rules tells something s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/14 09:35 PM
4

I'd be interested in hearing from blue- or purple-pillers in "tested" relationships where some form of this dynamic doesn't hold. I don't think of my marriage (Married 3 years, together 13) as a Captain/First Officer dynamic. It's more like a duet, or a team. We each have things we are good at and we have divided up responsibilities in a way that makes sense for us. I can be a very indecisive person when I am stressed out. I can see myself in your wife's shoes. But I would have asked anyone in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/14 07:59 PM
1

For this post, I believe we are using this definition: 'willing' means that if someone were to stop time and ask them in a safe environment whether they really want to have sex with the person in question, they'd answer in the affirmative
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/14 05:36 PM
2

And if you do have sex with someone under those circumstances are you a rapist? Are you a rapist is they change their minds but a not-rapist if they don't? If you have sex with someone without their consent, you are a rapist. If a person is impaired to a point where you cannot determine consent, you should not have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/14 03:00 PM
5

That you shouldn't have sex with someone who is drunk because there is no way to know if they are "willing." In established relationships where this has been discussed beforehand, this might be ok. But not for strangers or people who have only known each other for a short time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/14 06:16 PM
7

'willing' means that if someone were to stop time and ask them in a safe environment whether they really want to have sex with the person in question, they'd answer in the affirmative There is no way to determine this when you are with someone who is drunk that you don't know extremely well.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/14 02:56 PM
3

I'm blue pill and I have read a lot of Roissy/Heartsie. He reminds me of Elmer Gantry.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/14 02:51 PM
5

I have many friends who have casual sex. They just don't talk about it in a Red Pill way. "I met a hot guy/chick last night and we hooked up. I hope s/he calls/doesn't call because it was good/bad/weird." I don't know anyone who talks about sex for conquest or revenge - just for fun or as a way to find a compatible partner. I have friends who have cheated, men and women, and they usually talk about it in terms of things they regret. I've never had anyone brag to me about cheating, just worry abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/14 02:43 PM
0

That's not sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/14 02:49 PM
1

Your culture is not important to me, mine is. Oh! I thought TRP was being presented as a universal truth? Wouldn't it apply across cultures? Which cultures does it work with, and which cultures does it not work with?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 07:44 PM
1

Why is the name more important than DNA? I'm Latina, and we do things a little bit differently. My Dad actually has three last names, but he got sick of Americans not getting it, so my brother and I only have one last name. Is my brother only 1/3 as valuable an heir because my parents decided not to saddle him with the bureaucratic nightmare that would be an American with 3 last names? Does this retroactively make the male ancestors with the other two dropped names failures?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 07:34 PM
2

I gave you three other advice columnists that don't enforce rigid gender roles or see "last minute resistance" as a "shit test." You believe the ends justify the means. I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 07:20 PM
2

So basic family needs = having a son? And if that son decides not to procreate? Are you also a failure?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 07:14 PM
2

I think the reason "game" works if it does at all is that it's a numbers game. If you go from sitting in your basement all the time to going out and talking to people, you will have more success. If people wanted more advice, I would direct them to Dan Savage, Doctor Nerdlove and Captain Awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 05:53 PM
2

No, not at all actually. Personal preference is great. When you try to say that everyone should think that way, or that everyone else does think that way because it's "natural" but they are too scared to admit it, that's when you do harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 05:40 PM
2

TRP does not wish to enforce natural gender roles onto anyone, it simply says that if you want to attract high quality people of the opposite sex your best bet is to fall into these gender roles, and seek mates who also fall into these gender role Them's some weasel words. It's not that we want to enforce gender roles, it's just if you don't fit into them, you are unnatural and you'll never find love. I'm also still waiting for how sexism is useful. First you said you need it for success, and no…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 05:23 PM
3

Every person on this planet is sexist to some degree, I would agree that no one can be a perfect feminist because human beings can easily revert to lazy stereotypes sometimes without noticing it. But then your statement loses all its meaning. It's like saying "You can't be successful in life without being illogical to some degree" because everyone is illogical sometimes. because sexism simply means that men and women have different strengths and weaknesses. I would define sexism as a point of vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 04:47 PM
3

How do you define "successful in life?" Because I know many people who I would consider to be quite successful who are not sexist, and are in fact extremely egalitarian or openly feminist. I don't think Michael Bloomberg or Barack Obama are sexist at all, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 04:25 PM
1

So any objection to the status of women past the late 19th century western world is a shit test? That's nonsensical. The status quo should be regularly reevaluated and challenged. Authority should be questioned. Also I think that your premise that all men objectify women is misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/14 12:49 PM
1

Why is asking what someone's intentions are in a relationship a shit test?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 09:16 PM
2

I don't understand what you are getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 08:52 PM
0

Oh ok, well let's see how this works from a RPW FR 9th date, i met his friends hiking. after the hike i showered then we made out, and i told him i wasn't on tinder just looking for sex. and i hated guys who just wanted sex from me, after he listened and agreed he's looking for more, i gave him a blowjob (after the hike, before he showered!). he never pressured me for sex. Now, perhaps you will say that it WAS a "shit test" because she did want to know where she stood with this guy - was it only…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 08:40 PM
8

The problem with your question, besides of course its sheer ridiculousness, is its direct contradiction to the other complaint of feminism where men don't see certain types of women as sex objects, viz. old, fat, unkempt and plain downright ugly. You misunderstand. The objection is that not that fat or unattractive women aren't seen as sex objects. The critique is that women who are attractive are seen as only good for sex, and women who are not attractive are seen as good for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 08:32 PM
1

ok, see edit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 07:54 PM
1

ok, edited.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 07:48 PM
2

see edit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 07:47 PM
0

see edit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 07:46 PM
3

How is it a loaded question when I have given an upvoted example of someone making that statement in /r/TheRedPill? If we can't use text that is popular in the subreddit, what is the content of The Red Pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 07:14 PM
4

/u/Clauderoughly stated "I'm not an object" Is a bullshit feminist shit test. At the time of this post, it had 25 upvotes, now it has 29. If "I'm not an object" Is a bullshit feminist shit test. wouldn't that mean that /u/Clauderoughly and at least 29 other TRP subscribers believe that women are in fact objects? If not, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 06:52 PM
2

Cordelia Fine's critique of the study: To give a sense of the huge overlap in behavior between males and females, of the 26 possible comparisons, 11 sex differences were either nonexistent or so small that if you were to select a boy and girl at random and compare their scores on a task, the “right” sex would be superior less than 53 percent of the time. Even the much-vaunted female advantage in social cognition and male advantage in spatial processing were so modest that a randomly chosen boy w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 06:28 PM
1

Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 06:20 PM
1

I'm not afraid of Roosh. But I stand by my observation that he describes his penis as a weapon. Because he literally did.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/14 02:31 PM
3

This is what Roosh appears to think apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/14 04:20 PM
9

Yes, he describes his penis as seeking a victim to impale.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 10:17 PM
3

Married 3 years, been together 13 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 02:24 PM
0

As I have said several other times in this thread, RP people claim special knowledge of social dynamics that other people do not understand. So in most situations it would seem that a RP man would know more about the consequences of sex than the woman, specifically more about the negative consequences for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/14 11:56 AM
1

Yes. I am responsible for any pollution I produce. That's why I take public transportation or walk as much as possible and drive a hybrid when I have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/14 01:08 AM
4

An example I gave elsewhere in this thread was encouraging a partner you don't intend to marry to get a tattoo of your name on their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 06:41 PM
2

RP claims they have special knowledge of social dynamics that they claim most women are not aware of. It would seem that this creates a situation when you know you are harming a woman's future but she does not know
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 06:14 PM
5

I believe all people have an obligation to refrain from doing harm to others. You clearly don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 05:07 PM
5

But you do have RP views, and you believe them to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 04:26 PM
7

You are responsible for your own behavior. But RP claims they have special knowledge of social dynamics that they claim most women are not aware of. It would seem that this creates a situation when you know you are harming a woman's future but because she does not know or does not care, that makes it ok? Harm is harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 04:26 PM
7

If you have no intention of marrying her, then you are showing a careless disregard for her future. This is disrespectful.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 01:53 PM
4

No. Because I don't think most people are Red Pill. I want to know how Red Pillers justify this. If you know that you aren't going to marry a woman, and you also believe that having sex with her makes her less likely to find a partner when you are done with her, isn't it harmful to her to have sex with her? To me, that would be like encouraging someone you don't intend to marry get a tattoo of your name on their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 01:52 PM
6

So you disagree with Phantom Dream above? It doesn't matter how many women your man has slept with because his value does not decrease with each additional partner
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 01:49 PM
11

Yes. RedPillWifey said so herself: I'll say that my husband has told me that if I'd have slept with him on the first date, he would have written me off as "not LTR material". You yourself have said that your husband does not respect you because you have sex with him: do you believe men ever actually "respect" women? my husband says straight up he could never respect or listen to anything that bends over and takes it, but hes more blunt than most
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 04:43 AM
3

First of all, I believe the correct term is transgender. Second, I never said gender itself was a social construct. I said that gender roles - the behaviors associated with certain genders are influenced by culture. This is demonstrably true. In Western cultures, stockings and high heeled shoes were upper class men's clothing. Now they are for women. In the USA, women are generally more physically affectionate with each other than men. In the Middle East, men friends will hold hands and even kis…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/13 01:12 AM
7

Feminists posit that men and women act within proscribed gender roles because of socialization and cultural influences and that these roles are malleable. I thought that TRP was about the essential differences between men and women that are true regardless of time or circumstance. Is that wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/13 09:00 PM
2

These papers provide support for the idea that women act in a hypergamous way. But there's no evidence as to why they do this. Nothing here suggests that these preferences are intrinsic to having two X chromosomes or being born with ovaries and a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/13 08:46 PM
23

As if there's anything about "dread game" that's compatible with "forsaking all others" If a man is really so miserable because of wife not wanting to have sex with him that he is considering divorce or cheating I think he should tell her that. Perhaps that's also a form of instilling dread. But it's at least an honest one.
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/13 06:09 PM
18

I think that all people who want a monogamous commitment should make an effort to satisfy their partner sexually. But in the context of The Red Pill, the dynamic changes. Because instead of being honest about his needs and then following through with a divorce, it becomes about instilling fear. What I really want to know is if Red Pill Women want to be treated this way? Do they really think manipulation by fear/dread is something that has a place in a marriage? Seems from the responses the answe…
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/13 06:05 PM
34

Men often report having "wife goggles" for their wife... They look past all the flaws and see the younger woman they married. I didn't totally buy into it at first, but I've seen enough red pill married guys mention it that there's gotta be some truth to it. They'll have a sense of loyalty for you if you have a sense of loyalty for then, generally. So, what's up with "Dread Game?" It's something even married guys are advised to do. How would you respond to your husband doing this? Is it all in g…
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/13 05:42 PM
29

Do you agree that you stopped maturing emotionally at 11? If so, how could you contribute anything of substance to a relationship with a man who is more complicated than you could possibly understand? The "red pill" idea of marriage appears to be more like a parent/child relationship than a covenant between equals. Do you see your husband as a father figure?
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/13 05:26 PM
27

But that doesn't mean they don't develop an emotional connection to us eventually... How could a Red Pill Man or Woman ever believe that such a connection is possible? It's required reading that women are emotional children.
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/13 05:06 PM
7

At first I thought this was a genuine threat to Ms Watson, but from your later comments, I can see that this is a sarcastic statement. However, I think you are being upvoted earnestly.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 08:00 PM
1

Is the (I'm assuming) woman who wrote that analogy saying that non-violent, emotionally coercive rape, or rape by extortion are not rape? No, I think she is saying that the analogy holds whether the woman was roughed up and brutally beaten or only held down. Being forced to do something you typically find pleasurable is a sadistic crime whether the person sustains injuries of not. I enjoy jogging. If someone kidnapped me and chained me to a treadmill while they jerked off that would not be the s…
/r/MensRights10/06/11 02:15 AM
1

Ok, fair enough, a prosecutor then from bringing the case to trial, or a police officer from taking the report seriously.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 02:08 AM
1

Yup. Sorry.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 10:33 PM
1

On the other hand, rape is the forcible version of an act women consent to all the time. It's not like stabbing or being beaten within an inch of your life. The only thing that separates sex and rape is that someone has forced you to do something you have done before/would do willingly under different circumstances. If that argument helped you find peace, I'm glad. But it doesn't work for everyone
/r/MensRights09/06/11 07:57 PM
1

Women who react the way you did, but still want to report it to the police are not taken seriously. Because they didn't "act like a victim should act." I don't think there is any such thing; there are obviously a variety of ways a woman could react. And that should have no bearing on the prosecution of the rapist. How far are you taking this "it's no big deal" idea? Should rape be treated like slapping someone in the face or spitting at someone?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 07:27 PM
1

no one thinks recommending to people that they lock their doors is victim-blaming, do they? If someone left their door unlocked and a theif came in and stole their things, people might think that the victim is stupid, but it wouldn't sway a jury into thinking that it wasn't actually theft.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 07:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter