TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MisterDeagle Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by MisterDeagle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Do you mean it was legally horrible or morally horrible? The courts can only interpret the laws as written.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 02:47 PM
28

But you aren't asking for vulnerability. You are asking for men to be strong for others. You even bolded it, which makes it stand out as your primary point. In my opinion, that's the same BS that already gets fed to men, sacrificing themselves for others. You just don't mind it in this scenario because they're sacrificing themselves for your ideals. There is nothing positive about this message. It doesn't help create a well-rounded individual.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 07:48 PM
54

This is the same silly framing of masculinity that gets men marched off to war. No thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 07:21 PM
-9

Terrible take. The sex offender registry is already terrible policy in the first place and second there are already laws governing false testimony and false reports to the police.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:10 PM
2

If the nazis were socialists than I'm Santa Clause.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 02:10 PM
146

This is the exact opposite of reality.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:35 AM
7

It's true. Go to any bar/club that's busy but has few washroom facilities and you will see women coming and going from the men's washroom because the wait is too long otherwise. No one thinks "omg, what a perv".
/r/MensRights27/10/17 02:00 PM
12

Every time I read one of these articles all I can think is I don't know anyone who fits the model you are describing. Must be my privilege. Or maybe, just maybe, the broken people who write these things are just projecting.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 05:37 PM
2

The thing is, these words exist because these things happen. What a cop out. I guess calling women hysterical/hormonal is fine than because these things happen. We are A-OK to refer to a women as bridezilla because these things happen. It's fine to call her a ball-buster, because these things happen. Etc. I'm sure she would be quick to trot out the "but we are the oppressed group" trope to justify her sexism.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 01:50 PM
5

Not a lick of sympathy for the man in the comments section of the article. It's sad really.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 05:36 PM
3

That the dubious science of evolutionary biology was to be revered, not dismissed as bunk designed to maintain the structures of patriarchal superiority and male leadership. TIL: evolutionary biology is bunk and was only created to maintain the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:07 PM
3

So we should be suspicious of all affection and attention until said displays of affection continue indefinitely? Don't people have enough to worry about in relationships without folks suggesting you might fall victim to manipulation at any moment. Manipulation that is clearly so common place it is considered a trend and has been given a name.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 06:13 PM
2

This has nothing to do with gender equality.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 06:49 PM
3

The only thing I saw in the video was assault. I must have missed the gender equality part.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 07:22 PM
18

It proves that when women are losing more than half the time, the system is rigged. I never like statements like this one. It always seems to imply intent where none exists. If you want to make the argument that the course favors men, as it is currently designed, then fine, but don't start acting like someone sat down and intentionally tried to make it that way. She probably pictures a bunch of guys in suits sitting around a table smoking cigars and laughing as they raise the height of the wall …
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:59 PM
5

Anyone on public transport with an infant deserves a seat. Especially while trying to feed the damn thing. Don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:52 PM
1

Canada, the new Sweden.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:38 PM
5

But wasn't the point of Ghomeshi case that this evidence demonstrated that the accusers had definitely lied about some points in their testimony and had probably lied about others? Yes, the Ghomeshi case never even got down to the point of considering consent because, in the judge's opinion, the testimony these women gave lacked credibility - partially due to the fact they were discussing the case and organizing their testimony.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 07:16 PM
8

I wouldn't jump ship just yet. The somewhat crazy fashion aside, this guy is pretty spot on in the article. Feminists and the media would like people to believe that men are rigid, inflexible and completely unwilling to move away from this pop culture created ideal of masculinity. The reality is, as history proves for us, men have been, and still are, infinitely flexible in how we express our masculinity and how we allow other to express theirs. I think men intrinsically understand this which is…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:01 PM
9

People probably think this feminist believes that trans women aren't really women and that's why she opposes these changes. In reality she just doesn't like that there is an identifiable group that may be more oppressed than her group. If she allows that to happen people may divert their attention, and their money, to helping the other group and that diminishes her power.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:32 PM
5

As long as they aren't screwing people out of work I say let them do what they want.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:51 PM
19

Everyone working at this screening -- venue staff, projectionist, and culinary team -- will be female. This was a non-issue for me until that line. Has some poor bastard been denied work based on his gender?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:36 PM
2

And let us delve deeper because you seem to think I'm applying a double standard. I wasn't directing that statement at you in particular. It was just in general. Child support is not a choice, it's a mandate. And there was a time where completing your pregnancy was a mandate. That didn't make it right. Now women have choices they can make. Pregnancy is a choice. Two parties agree to engage in an act which could result in it, with no third party involved except in very exceptional situations. I a…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:07 PM
3

I didn't realize slavery had a biological component. I guess being forced to work for another person against my will is just bad luck.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:34 PM
2

Plus, they can make a decision already to abort any chance of having a child by getting a vasectomy. A woman has an equivalent option, along with many others, before and after conception/birth. The difference here is that someone is claiming that denying a woman one of those options is the same as slavery. If you extend that logic it should apply to denying men their options as well.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:15 PM
2

I agree, pregnancy is a means to and end. Child support is also a means to an end. Removing peoples choices and making them a means to an end is either slavery or it isn't. You can't have it both ways but this is exactly what people try to do.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:03 PM
9

When we make fetuses ‘people’ and demand that women be subordinated in servitude to them… women become a means to an end. It’s no different from slavery.” This quote struck me as being particularly tone-deaf. If you apply this same logic to men it's the right thing to do, but when applied to women it's servitude.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 04:41 PM
5

All I got from this is that love and family are the patriarchy and those things are forcing women into straightjackets. Did I get that right?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 01:51 PM
10

I feel bad for this kid. Six years old and his dad subjects him to rape stories and women repeatedly saying "men are trash" on his way to school. I generally avoid criticizing peoples parenting choices but this was too much for me. How much earlier can we start destroying our boys self worth?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:33 PM
2

It's called being polite. Get a grip people. I hold doors for men too. I must be a misandrist.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:57 AM
20

When we avoid a job it's a choice; when women do it it's sexism :)
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:24 PM
5

All I get from this is that they think men are capable of acting like adults and women aren't.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:58 PM
16

I didn't realize 12 year old kids on the internet were so scary. In all seriousness though, these trolls are just picking the things they know will get the strongest reaction. For women and girls that means insulting their looks and threatening sexual violence are the easy go to's. For guys it can be a little harder so they run through the usual insulting your squeaky voice (if you are young enough), or insulting your skill at the game, or insinuating you have a tiny penis, or that they'll buttf…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:51 PM
2

His constant reuse of the same clips from the same interview gets a little annoying. I'm only about a quarter of the way through though and this pertains to the DV related stuff so maybe it doesn't continue.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:49 PM
1

I always laugh at the whole "mansplaining" thing. Almost everyone I know does this to a certain extent. I must know a lot of blowhards I guess. Or it could be that if you are having a half way serious discussion about anything everyone involved needs to set a basic understanding of certain facts and premises.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:40 PM
1

Put the manga down. The first step is admitting you need help. And you do NEED help.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:01 PM
13

Boys and men do not need to look at porn. Those that do need help, not enabling You hear that, all you porn watchers need help. Like right now. Before you start raping women.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:24 PM
6

Not sure how not wanting parts cut off children morphed into banning religions.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:14 AM
25

They don’t have to stop doing brises, they just have to modify what they’re doing,” Sherman said. “It’s not a medical procedure. It’s a profoundly significant and beautiful Jewish life- cycle event." This whole planet is fucked.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:18 AM
13

I don't really get the hate here. CAFE was citing a statistics canada report to back their claims. I've seen some people dismiss the report because the data was self reported and therefore less reliable. While I agree these reports may not carry the same weight because of the self reporting I highly doubt 50% of the men lied, misunderstood or misrepresented themselves. What would they have to gain?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 11:46 PM
6

They just wanted to make sure everyone was being treated unfairly. Good for them. /s
/r/MensRights06/04/17 09:11 PM
7

I'm sure there is a line the state has to walk, with regards to ensuring the best interest of its children and autonomy of their parents, but this seems like a step too far. Who thought these kinds of laws were even necessary? It was a one week vacation, it's not like she missed a whole semester.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 01:14 PM
13

It's think it's actually a clever bit of PR. He knows no one will give a shit if he claims his client is a victim but he can pull people's heart strings by suggesting her story will hurt women.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 01:03 PM
1

Your argument doesn't make any sense, the way he framed it means Pence is not a good standard for anyone, with or without power. That wasn't what I was saying in my comment. Maybe I could have worded it better but you went from 0-100 on this one pretty fast. All I'm saying is Pence isn't your standard guy/avergae Joe, even in regards to powerful men, and would be a poor template to draw any wide sweeping generalizations from so Jill's tweet is of little significance.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 08:38 PM
11

I'm pretty sure this is in reference to Pence. I wouldn't exactly hold him up as the standard for normal men, in positions of power or otherwise.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 06:09 PM
3

You are strangely triggered about the fact that someone had the audacity to call circumcised penises ugly. You will literally find millions of women in countries where circumcision is the norm who will say the exact opposite thing. Millions of women think your penis isn't ugly. There, has that helped shore up your fragile ego?
/r/MensRights31/03/17 01:39 PM
6

It's like people went to bed in Canada and woke up in Sweden.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:19 PM
3

Who needs Breitbart when you can just read it on the Swedish governmnets website. http://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2017/03/kunskap-om-mans-vald-mot-kvinnor-obligatoriskt-i-jurist--och-lakarutbildningarna/
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:20 PM
8

You may not like Breitbart but you could have at least read the article to see that they link directly to the source. http://www.regeringen.se/pressmeddelanden/2017/03/kunskap-om-mans-vald-mot-kvinnor-obligatoriskt-i-jurist--och-lakarutbildningarna/
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:47 PM
47

The faster this country implodes the faster people will realise feminism is not the answer.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 12:43 PM
3

According to Statistics Canada, women not only comprise 71 per cent of Canada's 4.1 million public sector jobs at all levels of government, but "gender parity now exists in the public sector with respect to women's representation in leadership positions." I had never heard this stat before. I was actually shocked by it.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 12:25 PM
10

I'm not going to lie. I laughed pretty hard at the "Chug the smug" slogan.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:17 PM
2

According to the UN Foundation, women reinvest 90 per cent of their income back into their families, while men reinvest only 30-40 per cent. I'm not sure in what universe that stat could be accurate. The web page they link to as their source doesn't seem to have a source of its own. Anyone know where this comes from? What impact have you seen from increasing the number of women in management and on boards? Their response to this is that they now have more women in management. Yes, but what impac…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:38 PM
4

Imagine the relationship you would have with your parents after you are old enough to understand what they did to you. How do you even reconcile something like this?
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:02 PM
2

Anti-feminism is a word used to describe people who are against equal rights for women. You may view it differently but many do not and for good reason. You would have an overly broad definition of criticism if you believe denying someone equal rights is even vaguely equivalent. Given the context in which most people see anti-feminism I don't think it belongs in the criticism section but needs a section of its own.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:21 PM
2

Yes, I read the anti-feminism page. It being filled with facts about the history of anti-feminism in its various forms is not to blame for the views people take on it, and it is not the fault of Wikipedia or its contributors that society at-large has difficulty seeing nuance. You are denying that there is any nuance between criticism and anti-feminism but somehow it's the rest of society that has difficulty. I don't like to hear that there are anti-feminists out there who are anti-feminists beca…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:43 PM
5

Did you read the anti-feminism page? It's filled with information that historically anti-feminism was all about denying women rights. I don't put that on the same level of valid criticism, sometimes even coming from inside the feminist ranks, and placing them together on the page conflates the two. I think that would bias the reader against the valid criticism contained in that section. I don't believe it was done intentionally but I think it was poor judgement.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:04 PM
5

I think part of the problem is that they merged the anti-feminism and criticism section into one. Criticism != anit-feminism but these two things are now linked together by virtue of how the page is laid out. Yes, anit-feminism is a broad term, and doesn't necessarily mean that you object to all things feminist, but good luck with dissuading people of that notion.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:28 PM
1

Another person posted about this in a different thread but apparently he doesn't have a case for sexual assault either. Here is the link. http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2017/2017onca180/2017onca180.html?autocompleteStr=PP%20v%20DD&autocompletePos=4
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:41 PM
5

My wife and I have two boys. She frequently takes them out on dates. I had no idea she was just trying to get into their pants. How could I have been so blind?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:37 PM
3

Ugh, the mere mention of a skin bridge makes me cringe a little.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:22 PM
8

My husband and my decision is based on straightforward risk analysis: a cold, hard, unemotional reading of the statistical data. I get what she is trying to say here but I've never understood people that go through life with this mindset. There are so man statistics out there, often contradicting each other, why not just use your own judgement and life experiences to evaluate situations. She calls it risk analysis but I call it intellectual laziness.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:45 PM
0

It would be no worse than self-reported data from a group of college students. I have to disagree. You've eliminated any case that fails to convict as well as any case that never make it to court. I would have to imagine that if the child/adolescent felt the need to report the experience then they likely felt harmed and that may exclude those who didn't.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:56 PM
5

Men have willingly registered, wtf?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:31 PM
2

I think you might be missing some of the nuance in this essay.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:03 PM
1

What they should do is perform a study of cases that made it into the courts and resulted in a conviction, ignoring all the bullshit ones where it's just teenagers having sex with other teenagers. If they can still find that the majority of victims suffered no ill effects, pigs will fly. If you do that then you would probably introduce even more bias than what might be present in the already available data.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:34 PM
2

The way that this particular case is playing out certainly demonstrates the validity of our procedures I almost fell out of my chair when I read it. They just doubled down on their suspension of these men even after finding out the rape accusation was BS. I'm not sure what I expected. Apparently they still feel justified in the actions they took against them.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:54 PM
3

Bill is just mad that Milo was better at saying all this crazy stuff.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 08:55 PM
1

I'm glad it's not just me. This article contains virtually no useful information. The headline is the most informative part of the article.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:05 PM
3

I mean the laws themselves not the fact that they are teaching kids about them.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:13 PM
4

This is so illogical I can't even wrap my head around it enough to formulate a logical argument against it. They've buried the needle on the crazy meter.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:37 PM
5

but the rest of civilized society knows what's up. So you mean most places in Africa and the US because those are some the only places still actively pushing this nonsense.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 06:50 PM
101

Loftus said that in her experiments she has been able to convince an average of 30 percent of healthy people of both genders that they had experienced traumatic events that were totally fabricated. The article references a study that seems to indicate both genders are susceptible to coercion to a certain degree. They noted that Calusinski had a very low verbal IQ, which meant that she had difficulty expressing herself and understanding others. Perhaps it was the low IQ and not her gender that ma…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 06:23 PM
1

The sample size here looks to be <300, most of which were college aged students, so I'm not sure how heavily you can lean on this data especially wrt this case.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 12:48 PM
1

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/sex-crimes-pictou-amy-hood-teacher-teenage-boys-1.3895637 Hood will be subject to electronic supervision during house arrest. Two years of probation will follow. As part of her sentence, Hood must give a DNA sample and go on the sex offender registry for life. She must stay off the internet, except for work, and even then must be supervised. She must stay at least two kilometres away from her victims and can't work with children, except her own. She also…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 12:16 PM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/woman-tweets-story-uber-driver_us_584f02aae4b0e05aded51939 Woman never use more than one tweet to tell a story. Womanthreading? Femithreading?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:58 PM
23

Mr Davies's nomination provoked a debate on Twitter with former Conservative MP Louise Mensch among those to welcome it but others questioning why men are even allowed to be on the committee. Trying to deny someone a seat, on a committee designed to help promote equality, based entirely on their gender. The irony.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:33 PM
163

Lol, house arrest. I can only imagine how this would have went down if this were a male teacher having oral sex with a 15 yr old girl. Jail time, registered sex offender, etc.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter