TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mitchellonfire Archive

View 2 posts and 262 comments by Mitchellonfire on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Just thought you'd like to know what they are saying behind your back. I asked why it wasn't posted here, they said they were "terrified" and that it wouldn't be "well received."
/r/MensRights10/06/11 06:47 PM
6

I disagreed (rightly so) with a lot of things here. That hardly makes me a feminist troll. The fact that people here cannot understand that difference is another reason mens rights have no chance. If the only people who stand up for men are complete jerk offs, you're going to drum out every rational person. Much like the Tea Party. I've had two accounts ever, this one and one that is all NSFW links. I have no intention o making a third.
/r/MensRights16/09/10 03:38 PM
9

It's shit like this that eventually convinced me that I am not a MRA. I used to think I was, I used to believe in standing up for men, but I cannot align myself with people as goddamn retarded as this. It may be throwing out the baby with the bathwater, but I've thought about it for a good long while, and I think I'm going to remove /r/MensRights from my frontpage.
/r/MensRights16/09/10 08:39 AM
4

It seems the term "mangina" has been a staple here from day one.
/r/MensRights24/08/10 11:29 PM
0

Yes, the only person who could ever understand would be those with HIV. Just like you have to be Palestinian to side with Palestine over Israel. Or gay to vote for gay rights.
/r/MensRights24/08/10 12:12 AM
-1

Yes, I don't believe this is a legal issue, the same way I didn't believe the Jewish/Arab "rape" case was rape. But it was tried as such. Just because there is a law doesn't mean there should be one. Same as people don't believe pot should be illegal. Same as some once believed that slavery should be illegal, despite what the courts and laws may have said then. My bad for not agreeing with everything that goes on in the legal system. I'm merely presenting my arguments why I believe what I do. An…
/r/MensRights23/08/10 07:39 PM
0

Firstly, I'm no troll. I just have an unpopular opinion. If you didn't want me to respond, you shouldn't responed yourself, instead of "shut the fuck up." You present an argument, I counter, you counter, and so on. If you were really done like you said, you'd be done and not respond. I don't believe you have to present any information, the same way I said last month when that man was persecuted for saying his name was Daniel, which led to believe that woman to believe he was Jewish instead of Ar…
/r/MensRights23/08/10 07:23 PM
-1

If you honestly can't tell the difference between two people getting drunk and banging and a guy taking a needle and maliciously injecting people with a disease, I think it's very clear who the real idiot is.
/r/MensRights23/08/10 07:10 PM
-4

Diseases happen. Condoms bust. I get it. But I just cannot find it in me to whip up outrage that one person has infected another with an infection. Everyone who got it got it from someone. I just don't think we need to prosecute them all. Or any of them for that matter.
/r/MensRights23/08/10 05:57 PM
-5

It's maintainable. I'd want it no more than I'd want syphilis. Which is why I use condoms. I have no sympathy for those who do not.
/r/MensRights23/08/10 05:10 PM
-2

And from cancer caused by HPV. And from complications from the flu.
/r/MensRights23/08/10 04:01 PM
-12

HIV is really not that big a deal anymore. But why stop at just potentially life threatening? How about we throw people in jail for spreading herpes? Or how about HPV, which could lead to cancer? What about the flu?
/r/MensRights23/08/10 03:37 PM
-9

I've never liked the idea of sending someone to prison because they have HIV. I have not a single unit of empathy (whatever that may be) for people who forgo a condom and get an STD, whether one party knew about the STD or not. Criminalizing sexual behavior between consenting adults is disgusting. EDIT: I want to stress I said the same thing when they charged a man with spreading HIV.
/r/MensRights23/08/10 03:22 PM
1

"the jerk store called, they're out of YOU." Avoicefor MEN. Plural. Indicating that you indeed speak for MEN and not just for yourself. Amazing that even had to be explained.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 01:33 AM
-4

Just because girls are affected in a manner IN NO WAY downplays the way boys are.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 08:36 PM
-3

Oh, please, kloo. You know damn well I'm no troll. And if you don't know that then you're worse off than I thought. And it's great you've talked about stereotypes affecting boys. So why are you attacking this piece about girls?
/r/MensRights12/08/10 08:33 PM
6

You know, just because it says that girl's may be negatively affected, it doesn't mean that boys are not in other areas. Are you really that touchy that just the mention of girls makes you angry, and think somehow it's a /r/Men'sRights issue? That you have to MOCK the girls who are affected by stereotypes? What if every time someone mentioned a crocodile, someone else had to chime in "well ALLIGATORS blah blah blah.." It would be pretty goddamn annoying. This wasn't a conversation about boys, it…
/r/MensRights12/08/10 07:59 PM
3

Really? Because I didn't see that distinction made anywhere in the article. "moody women who can't leave their personal life at home" sounds more like a personality gripe than a leadership gripe.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 07:48 PM
1

Not at all. One can be a very effective boss and be disliked, or even a beloved boss with very little effectiveness.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 07:31 PM
-1

True.. damn iphone.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 07:30 PM
0

4chan spelling is inexcusable when dealing with important matters, even if you are attempting to mock your opponents. Try again.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 06:12 PM
13

Official: Men are viewed as better bosses when employees surveyed, not actual better bosses.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 03:34 PM
3

I don't believe so. I think that fibbing to preserve feelings are part of the social contract and just good manners. The same way you wouldn't tell a friend that, when asked, his painting is awful, or when a girl tells her boyfriend that his haircut gone wrong is hardly noticeable. This is just another case of some of the extremists here looking for something to get angry about. Yes, I'm sure there are a few women in the world who asked vindictively "as a trap," the same way there are a few dick…
/r/MensRights11/08/10 06:59 PM
3

If an article says that women have "complete moral bankruptcy," you have yourself a case of women bashing.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 06:48 PM
3

Yes, and that's why I joined /r/mensrights and consider myself an MRA. But not to women bash. I hate the tactics that feminists use, and seeing my side use those very same tactics makes me fucking sick.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 06:38 PM
2

A guy with the username "avoiceformen" says he isn't speaking for anyone but himself. That's damned funny.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 03:54 AM
3

And the generalizations get even worse. Good job. You make us all look like fools. We have created a generation of women that are little girls hiding in women's bodies. Funny, I keep seeing feminists say the same thing about us. Either way both you and them are wrong. People on both sides of the extreme seem to be mad that the other has broken out of their ridiculous gender roles.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 09:45 PM
1

I'm dismissing the experiences of people being silently asked to lie for the consideration of others feelings as being a right's issue the same I would dismiss other peoples personal experiences watching a clown fall over. It has nothing to do with us. The fact is that there are women who feel that they have to "test" their men in this manner Some women can be jerks in a million ways just like some men can be jerks in a million ways. In no way does it make it a RIGHTS issue.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 08:49 PM
2

This should be the top comment. Dan Savage with a knock out.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 08:36 PM
2

And the troll word comes out.. again. I don't write a word I don't believe. I believe firmly in Men's Rights, and I hate seeing dumb shit like this make us look like misogynistic bitter woman haters. especially when you make statements like the one above. What's wrong with my statement above, exactly? Showing how we all may lie to be considerate of others feelings? How we may expect others to soften the truth? If I asked a person what they thought of my painting, I'd probably be upset if they sa…
/r/MensRights10/08/10 08:23 PM
1

What's the difference? What the difference between this and a woman telling her boyfriend that his haircut gone wrong "isn't that bad?" Really. What's the difference? Is it that one's being asked by a woman? People lie to protect the feelings of others all the time. It's part of our social contract and, quite frankly, good manners. While I think it may be a bad idea to ask "Does my ass look fat" in case they may not like the answer, I don't see this as a Men's Rights issue. I see this is a flims…
/r/MensRights10/08/10 07:22 PM
5

Is it any different than a friend asking "What do you think of my painting? Is it bad?" Do you think that being honest is the best policy if it is an entire mess? Especially if their ego is easily bruised? I have never, ever, been asked in my lifetime of dating the cliched "Does my ass look fat?" question. This is just a stupid stereotype for these men to take out their rage and bitch about women. This is just fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 07:03 PM
4

Not everytime.. but sadly often. Perhaps if people wouldn't try to masquerade misogyny as Men's Rights then I wouldn't have to point out that's it's not so much.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 06:50 PM
4

Oh, please. Saying woman bashing is woman bashing is not silencing. Dismissal of idiocy is not silencing. Forcibly removing dissenting opinions and banning is silencing. How do you not understand that?
/r/MensRights10/08/10 06:38 PM
1

Misandry is Jay's favorite word. You really start to wonder if he knows what it means. I'm glad that a lot of people are starting to realize exactly how out of his mind Jayhammers is, and how much he hurts our cause.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 05:14 PM
4

This isn't the rights of men.. this is flat out women bashing. Over something so minuscule. And that leap from calling women out for "Complete moral bankruptcy" to the gender wage gap is fucking ridiculous. Ugh.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 04:37 PM
1

Two prison guards standing in front of a black murderer talking about black murder is more acceptable. If you're going to make parallels, do it correctly.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 09:04 PM
1

But the two teachers we were talking about were just DISCUSSING how boys behave worse, not preemptively sending them into the corner. So, not wrong.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 02:37 AM
1

Were they talking about just you, or boys? Probably the boys (multiple) they saw EVERY DAY.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 10:33 PM
3

But there's absolutely nothing wrong with making an observation. I worked at a clothing store for a long time, and one thing I noticed that I had never been told were that Indians (from India, not Native Americans) would often switch price tags to make things cheaper. Damnest thing, I saw it all the time. Now, does me making that observation REINFORCE it happening? No. They were going to do it whether I said it out loud or not. If we can't just say "I see this happening in front of me," what can…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:48 PM
4

Taking glee in his rape is pretty much advocating. Don't pretend that you aren't.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 07:28 PM
-1

You're pretty much still advocating it.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 06:22 PM
2

If I were black.. then yeah. As it is I'm more likely to be murdered by a white person. EDIT: Also, are you making this based on a stereotype, or your personal experience dealing with black murders every day of your life like the teachers dealing with their students?
/r/MensRights04/08/10 06:21 PM
21

One time in high school I got my best friend (female) a job at the toy store that I worked at. We had these big magnetic letters used to make signs with all over the back of the stock room door, and every day someone would arrange them in some sort of inappropriate manner. Within the first week of working there, she put up "Mitchell is my whore bitch" on the back of the door, just for funsies. After about a week of that being up, I put up "Sarah is my dirty prostitute" in the letters. I was quic…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 05:20 PM
14

I don't like what this man did, and I'm glad to have him rot in jail away from civilized society, but prison rape is no joke. Nor should it be considered a form of punishment.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 04:58 PM
4

Actually he's getting downvoted because what he's saying isn't actually a stigma. Someone asking if he saw a game, the same way I might ask someone if they saw Lost, is not a good example of inflicting stereotypes. It's someone trying to find common ground for small talk.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 04:45 PM
5

But that was just two teachers making an observation based on what they saw every day of their lives. Even in The War Against Boys, Christina Hoff Sommers acknowledges that girls are more obedient than boys, and that's why teachers (unfairly) prefer them.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 04:11 PM
5

I'd rather marry a woman with a sense of humor than an angel.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 01:16 AM
2

It was directly in response to how often I saw people talk about later in life sexual dysfunction. I did pick out a single line, and did not mean for it to be seen as the point of the whole article. But the reason you said you banned it was TROLLING. Which, quite frankly, come the fuck on.
/r/MensRights27/07/10 06:41 AM
2

It was not my intention to troll, and its regretable that you have chose delete this link because it goes slightly against the extreme point of view. I saw so much people on here frothing at the mouth about how terrible circumcision is. I wanted to temper that. It just seems to me that an association of pediatricians would seem less biased and more reliable than circumstitions.com. It's like you're TRYING to alienate moderates. Feminism got where it is today by appealing to the mainstream. Every…
/r/MensRights27/07/10 05:56 AM
1

In no way have I ONCE in this whole situation said, insinuated, or believed that being circumcised is in any way better than uncicumcisrd. I don't believe that. Do you think this is what I beleve? Is tha why you keep bringing up "better" or "greater?" You're right, I'm not very good at arguing with people who don't understand what they are arguing against. You're projecting SO MUCH inthis conversation that is not there. You're making straw men out thin air. And you started with the insulting ton…
/r/MensRights26/07/10 11:25 PM
1

You're purposefully being thick, and using small technicalities to get out of meaningful discussion. You know what I mean what I mean when I say great. You know I don't mean larger than, etc. You know this. But you dishonestly pretend to be stupid, when I know you're not. I'm using great in the "good, wonderful, swell, fantastic" sense. You're pretending to be stupid to hold to an obviously flawed point. Another symptom of extremism: when you have to say things you know not to be true just to sa…
/r/MensRights26/07/10 11:08 PM
1

I'm making a statement. You're makin a comparison. You honestly don't know the difference between great and greater?
/r/MensRights26/07/10 10:52 PM
1

So tell me right now, is it a fallacy to say it's great to be a man? And if you don't need experience both uncu wnd cut to make a judgement, then why should I? How is it you're not seeing how full of shit you are?
/r/MensRights26/07/10 10:43 PM
3

Is that why you have credibility? You have experienced both cut and uncut equally and chosen one as superior? Because if that's the only way to deduce, then put up or shut up (figuratively, of course. I have no interest in seeing your wang). You say again that I cannot determine that having a circumcised penis is great unless first I compare it to being uncicumcisrd. This is the EXACT same as saying I cannot say being a man is great unless I've also been a woman. Thats not spin. That's using you…
/r/MensRights26/07/10 10:16 PM
3

Again, idiot, I never said better. I said great. All I have going for me in this debate is what i can conclusively determine for myself from and unbiased source: me. My circumcised penis functions awesomely. I have no complaints with it, and that seems to bother some people. I can also say my life is much better now than it was before the circumcision. Not because of, mind you. Everyone here seems to be misunderstanding my stance. I'm not pro-circumcision. I'm just not anti-circumcision. Now go …
/r/MensRights26/07/10 09:46 PM
1

What was life like for you when you didn't have your dick circumcised? Is this the question that you're wanting me to answer? The one I don't have an answer for, because I, just like everyone else circumcised as a baby, have no way of remembering it? I really thought it was rhetorical. But I'll take a shot at it. I was newly born.. I probably drooled a lot, and I know I happened to smile a lot as a baby. I hardly ever cried, which led my parents to believe something was wrong with me. I was a bi…
/r/MensRights26/07/10 08:23 PM
0

I never said better. I said great. My circumcised penis is great. Can you honestly say it's not great being a man simply because you haven't been a woman?
/r/MensRights26/07/10 06:01 PM
-3

Oh, I'm sorry... I thought I was talking to a rational, if somewhat awful, human being. I was obviously mistaken. Circumcision and divorce court are LINKED? I'm sorry for wasting both your time and mine.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 07:09 AM
-3

Thanks for the "you're wrong." I wasn't sure who was right or wrong here before you said that. Seeing things in black and white must be awesome.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 06:47 AM
-3

I don't think it's the basis. But it's mentioned because some people want to believe that if you're circumcised you'll experience problems down the line with sexual satisfaction.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 06:40 AM
-1

I'm "disturbed" when someone like you, and your zealot ilk, treat other fellow MRAs as monsters for not agreeing. I honestly don't give two shits about circumcision. I'm sick of the word by now. I've actually tried to get that greasemonkey script to remove reddit submissions by keywords just so I wouldn't have to see people like you losing your shit once every other month when the anti-circumcision subreddit bleeds into /r/mensrights. Mostly, I'm disturbed because you can't see that almost every…
/r/MensRights26/07/10 06:34 AM
-1

I got it. I just didn't care. Because, frankly, I don't care about children.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 06:06 AM
-5

You're a zealot for treating people who do not agree with you as monsters. For throwing fits because people are fine with their circumcised genitals and think everyone who disagrees is in "denial." You're a zealot because you have lumped so much into seeing ONE SIDE of this issue that you've lost all perspective. This is not torture, you know this is not torture, but you keep saying it because the more grotesque you can make it sound, the more false outrage you can muster. You're a zealot for th…
/r/MensRights26/07/10 05:51 AM
-5

I'm in the "whichever" camp. Want to have your kid circumcised? Cool. If not, also cool. The amount of zealots losing their minds over this issue and calling anyone like me that doesn't agree with them "sick fucks" and the such is the reason I want to show that really, this is no big deal.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 05:37 AM
-1

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/103/3/686 Here's a basic, UNBIASED overview by the AAP, with links to all the tests. And just because it proved something you don't believe, you call it flawed. Let me ask you, what would it take to change your mind here? What study, evidence, etc would it take to convince you that newborn male circumcision is no where near as bad as everyone wants to make it out to be?
/r/MensRights26/07/10 05:35 AM
1

Two studies showed two different things? This has never happened before and must mean I am lying! I'm sorry if I take the word of the American Academy of Pediatrics over an obviously biased website named "circumstitions."
/r/MensRights26/07/10 05:27 AM
0

The conclusion of the American Academy of Pediatrics is that a self-report of circumcised adult men had less sexual dysfunction and more varied sexual practices, with equivocal evidence regarding sensitivity and sexual satisfaction. The effect of FGM on a woman's sexual experience varies depending on many factors. FGM does not eliminate all sexual pleasure for all women who undergo the procedure, but it does reduce the likelihood of orgasm.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 05:10 AM
3

The effects on adult men and adult women are very different.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 04:38 AM
0

Actually, what constitutes as a violation of bodily integrity is very very much controvertible. I know because this topic is a controversy. Ask any person in any culture in the world what violates the body and they will give you a different answer. Don't use words you don't know the meaning to.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 12:53 AM
2

If you want to pretend that a penis and a vagina are the same, and that the two forms of circumcision are the same, go for it. Howl at the moon. But, you know better.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 09:28 PM
4

They are two different procedures with two different outcomes.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 09:10 PM
6

I'm not saying it's perfect, but a woman has an out, so should a man.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 08:42 PM
2

This is the exact stance I take on this issue, great read. When discussed here before, however, it was pointed out to me that in one instance there is a child and one there isn't. While a child growing up without financial support in a society that basically requires the support of two parents just to get by, I consider myself a mens rights activist, not a childs activist.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 07:43 PM
0

Hahaha, oh the pity ploy. "I'm pretending to pity you, so that I can show my superiority over you." Anyway, I do care that we show some moderation and self control in this subreddit. As an MRA, when I see someone losing their shit over a near inconsequential topic, it reflects poorly on me, and us as a group. Think of it as a moderate feminist standing up to an extremist, and informing them that, no, not all men are rapists and not all sex is rape. They both believe the other is hurting their ca…
/r/MensRights25/07/10 06:41 PM
-4

What, your vagina?
/r/MensRights25/07/10 05:56 PM
-1

And can we please not derail every single conversation about female circumcision into one about male circumcision? It's just getting kind of rude. PS I love my circumcised penis and wouldn't have it any other way.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 05:44 PM
0

Or, perhaps, have it's own conversation. Like in the anti-circumcision subreddits. Not every conversation about female circumcision needs to be made about made circumcision.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 05:57 AM
-1

I have several hobbies. What does hobbies have to do with not getting my undies in a wad over circumcision? Again, who said anything about good times? You're the one calling names. I'm trying to add some moderation to the conversation. Not everything is a big goddamn wrench-out-your-heart-and-damn-everyone-who-disagrees deal. The topic was about female mutilation, and so us fine fellows at /r/MensRights has to go over there and make it about us? Seems unnecessary to me. If nothing else, I want t…
/r/MensRights25/07/10 05:29 AM
-2

Who said anything about a good time? The original post was in /r/worldnews. Not everyone is going to agree with /r/MensRights there. Especially as many of us see the anti-circumcision bit as a tad extreme. I'm an MRA. I was circumcised as a baby, and have no problem with it. I love not having a foreskin. I, personally, would have rather had it done as a baby when I wouldn't remember it than now. Why do you enter a place where people are fucking rage-filled furious at having their genitals carved…
/r/MensRights25/07/10 04:54 AM
1

Downvotes? On reddit? THAT'S MISANDRY! Seriously, though. People view this in different lights. Get over it.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 03:57 AM
2

He "worshiped" women in the same way that down and out alcoholics worship cheap mouthwash. If we want to promote a positive view of men's sexuality, this is not the place to start.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 01:06 AM
2

This is maxim magazine tripe, and you know it. I will continue to dismiss things that require dismissal.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 12:37 AM
1

This is more pick up artist/maxim magazine than men's rights. I'm sure there are subreddits for that somewhere.
/r/MensRights24/07/10 11:26 PM
2

Oh, acknowledging that someone wasn't a troll was a mistake, just because they didn't immediately agree with everything you said afterwards? I thanked you graciously for your statements that day, but in no way does that mean you get a pass from posting some good ol' fashioned not Men's Rights issues here. If there was a point, tell me. Dismissal is NEVER out of line. Creation is constantly dismissed in the realm of science. And misogyny should always be dismissed here too. But then again, I didn…
/r/MensRights24/07/10 05:34 AM
1

A subreddit I have never posted in, but pre-banned from because people are afraid of honest, frank discussion with differing opinions.
/r/MensRights24/07/10 05:25 AM
1

Usually when I see you it's half or half for me. Occasionally I agree and upvote, otherwise.. well, you can guess.
/r/MensRights24/07/10 12:24 AM
3

I think trying to keep this movement and subreddit a little more moderate and out of the "bitter angry men" extreme is more important than other's perceptions of me. Either take my word that I believe in the rights of men, but don't want us to be linked with those who just want to put down women... or don't. I'm going to be doing the same thing either way.
/r/MensRights24/07/10 12:13 AM
2

I toss upvotes with everything I agree with. Things I believe to make us look bad I go out of my way disagree with. And that's where the insults usually start. And often, if I ask that, it's because I don't find it relevant to the cause. If I were a feminists, why would I be bothered that I were called such?
/r/MensRights23/07/10 11:56 PM
3

I'm a MRA. I really am. That's why I argue here so much. It's the same reason I am 100X more critical of my own artwork than others. I believe us to have a noble cause, but often get sidetracked by flat out misogyny. I want this to be the best it can be, because it reflects on my beliefs. If I were a feminist I'd be doing the same thing to them.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 11:09 PM
2

Yes, Poe's law. He also continuously asks for bans, tries to silence others by calling them a troll, and worst defines every action that is not on par with his own "misandry." It's hard to believe anyone acts like that. It's almost like someone trying to take all the worst this subreddit has to offer, and mimic it to such an absurd state to make us all look bad. If you want to resort to the same tactics, go for it. Or ignore. Either works. What does not work is banning.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 10:34 PM
2

But aren't there people here who uses those tactics who aren't trolls? Jayhammers, for instance, uses the dirtiest, most shameful tricks I've ever seen. I almost think he's a Poe, but I'm not willing to ban someone who actually believes in the cause.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 08:39 PM
4

That's a damn good derail. Damn good.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 03:35 AM
1

There shouldn't be one. Easiest answer to trolls is to ignore. Banning does nothing but hurt those who believe in an unpopular opnion and then are labelled a troll. I've been called troll on here plenty. I've had several ask that I be banned. He'll, one guy got so pissed at something I said here once that he set up a whole new subreddit so here could ban me there (/r/malestudies). Banning doesn't work, just shuts out debate.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:56 PM
1

And more demeaning, silly nonsense. I've said my piece. Rape is rape, consensual sex is not. That's what I came here to say, and I've said it. I'd like to thank you for not keeping a civil tongue, and act a goddamn fool. It really helps me see your side of things. I'm out.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:41 PM
1

To rape and pillage meant to pillage the houses and literally rape the women.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:38 PM
0

Words are not laws. Edit: you are right, though. This is an attempt to change the meaning of a word. Hopefully one that rational people will dismiss. They can try to change the meaning of the word rape to include ALL sex (See: hardcore feminists) but that doesn't make it so.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:24 PM
-1

Again, the personal attacks. You cannot debate me on the definition on the word (which is what I'm arguing here) so you fall back on my relaity somehow being inferior. I believe words have meaning and cant be correctly applied to everything, therefore I live in an imaginary land. But we are just running in circles now. You can declare me the loser as you have been doing and call crossing the street illegally rape. I'll keep using words by their intended purpose.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:22 PM
0

Why have words if they can mean anything? Definition, by definition should be definite.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:13 PM
-1

Wow, someone who constantly says "I win!" in a debate. You've won in showing how right you think you are, that's for sure. Sorry, bro But consensual sex is not rape.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:10 PM
0

Interstingly enough, I did just look up rape in the dictionary. Wouldn you know it, there's no mention of deception anywhere in it. But then the dictionary must not have heard that a couple of judges in a couple states have decided to change the meaning of rape. It turns out judges an laws are never, ever wrong or misguided, so I'm glad that puts that to rest. But mostly I want to thank you for your personal attacks on me. Acting as if I'm some disgusting woman hater because I don't label walkin…
/r/MensRights22/07/10 08:56 PM
3

So any form of consensual sex can be considered rape, if someone out there deems it so? Rape is one of the most brutal, horrible acts one person can inflict on another. To correlate consensual sex to that using the same word is degrading to every person who has ever been genuinely raped.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 08:41 PM
1

That's not rape. At this rate, the word rape is one day going to encompass every interaction people can have with eachother. I prefer words to have meaning. That's why when a team loses, I don't say "they totally got raped." I don't consider it rape when a 14 year old has consensual sex with a 17 year old. The more it's used for things that ARE NOT RAPE, the more it's meaning is deluded.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 08:35 PM
0

Lying to get sex: Is it rape? No.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 08:06 PM
1

Rape by deception is still rape. You can say anything like this, it doesn't make it true. Rape by consent is still rape. I don't believe a woman being racist against Arabs should redefine rape.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 08:05 PM
3

Guess what? There are complete idiots and fucktards out there. They may actually believe the dumb things they are saying. That does not make them a troll, nor does it mean they should be banned.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 07:43 PM
7

People are more than allowed to have ridiculous, stupid, wrong opinions. Maybe encouraging them to stick around and learn something may teach them otherwise, instead of just banning which just means that we are pretending people don't actually think that way.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 07:26 PM
-7

Aren't many of us here because we don't like the behavior of 2X and their feminist ilk? Using them as a model for our behavior is a poor choice.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:42 PM
8

Womens bodies also respond naturally to rape by getting wet, even when they don't want to. It's a natural bodily function we have no control over. That in no way negates rape claims.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:41 PM
-6

I thought we had learned our lesson here, kloo. What they're saying may be disgusting, but the easiest way not to slide down a slippery slope is to walk away. Or in this case just downvote.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:38 PM
2

The tough, fearless and self-reliant self-image of Western men is holding them back from showing love, leaving them more vulnerable to addiction and disease such as heart problems While this article is full of shit just attacking another guy, there is a connection between holding in emotions and not crying and heart disease. But I'll take the heart disease, thanks.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 02:54 PM
-1

Thank you. Out of context, this was dumb as fuck. Sadly many seemed to support it regardless.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 07:11 AM
0

It's not obvious, though. What would "being a man" mean if it would cause someone to call them a brute or monster? If you think "being a man" causes people to call them names, please, enlighten us as to what it means to be a man, and why that would cause the sexist name calling. Otherwise I call bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 01:17 AM
-2

Yes, that's the cause of domestic violence. Silly names that nobody really uses. How is it men are playing the victim here? I mean, if it's domestic violence against a man, yes, sure. Victim. But you think someone saying "brute" (which I don't think I've ever heard anybody actually seriously say that) causes the brutal physical assault on women? Really?
/r/MensRights17/07/10 01:15 AM
3

Even if that's the case, it's an economic case, not a gender one.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 03:19 AM
5

I always rolled my eyes when feminists tried to make make up a gender issue, as if they were being oppressed by something they willingly bought. I have a hard time finding count chocula, so I have to buy other cereal. That's not a rights issue. And if people buy the cheaper razors, they'll make less of the expensive ones. As so often has to be said around here, "why is this here?"
/r/MensRights12/07/10 11:04 PM
7

While I do dearly want to see false rape accusers punished for the damage they do with their lies, I worry that it creates a system where once the lie is told, they cannot recant and tell the truth without being punished. So the lie is repeated over and over out of self preservation, and even when the man is aquitted, he will still have the sex crime stigma attached to him. If a woman can't tell the truth and clear a man of wrong doing without going to jail herself, who do you think she is going…
/r/MensRights11/07/10 11:30 PM
2

Weren't you just complaining about gender stereotypes in jokes in regard to a FFFFUUUUUU comic?
/r/MensRights11/07/10 07:43 AM
5

It seems so much of this subreddit constantly talks about how horrible an idea marriage is for the modern day man... and then when a cartoon character does not like the idea of marriage, it's a stereotype? Stop looking for things to get insulted over.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 08:16 PM
5

I really doubt it.
/r/MensRights07/07/10 12:07 AM
11

Whelp... guess it's time to buy a video camera.
/r/MensRights07/07/10 12:07 AM
2

Every time in this subreddit I disagree with something, I am immediately accused of being a woman. My name is Mitchell. A guys name. Come on.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 11:28 PM
2

You can read a well written series of personable testimonials about how great it is to kick dogs, too. That doesn't make it any less stupid or horrid.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 03:41 PM
2

I have business replying when I see overly simplistic, misogynistic statements hurting true believers in Men's Rights by painting us as the knuckle dragging bafoons others believe us to be. This as a disgusting read, and we should have more integrity than this.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 03:40 PM
6

A huge percentage of American women are selfish, flighty, insecure, needy and psychotic, and quite capable of concealing those traits during the dating phase. Yeah, leading with a statement that stupid, there's no way I'm going to give this article a chance.
/r/MensRights03/07/10 01:53 PM
2

I suppose 98/100 is a fraction, yes. We have a vocal few detractors, but I wouldn't say that MRA's are in the minority here. Sorry if I didn't give a resounding round of applause, but it's harsh tone was directed at the reader. A lot of "YOU"s thrown about. And then it was submitted to the one of the few places where people are already aware of these issues. It seemed funny to me. It's like touting how advantages of joining a Boy Scouts troop to a bunch of 3rd year scouts. Angrily.
/r/MensRights26/06/10 04:19 AM
6

I like that the article says " YOU AREN'T A MRA, SHAME ON YOU." And then it gets submitted to /r/mensrights. It's like squirrels reading an article saying "YOU AREN'T EATING ENOUGH NUTS AND STOPPING RANDOMLY ON TREES BEFORE CONTINUING SCURRYING." This isn't preaching to the choir, it's smacking an alter boy.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 10:25 PM
2

Under many's modern interpretation of feminism, yes. Under the extreme's interpretation, no. In the end, feminists will occasionally have diverging viewpoints as their tent grows bigger. Didn't we end up having a conversation about that during the whole ban-debacle?
/r/MensRights24/06/10 05:58 PM
2

Yes. I'm sorry that when I'm talking about generalizations you think I'm talking about absolutes. I'll be more clear next time.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 05:50 PM
3

Oh my goodness! There are exceptions to the rule? That's just shocking. Feminists are overwhelmingly pro-choice. Picking out 10 that wasn't does not negate that.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 05:47 PM
7

Feminists have always criticized anti-choice women. And pro-lifers criticize the other way. And rightfully so. How is that "fighting among themselves?" When feminists adopted the ideas and slogans that everybody is a feminist just for wanting equal rights, they adopted the people who do not believe in abortion. Are they allowed to have differing opinions within their group? Of fucking course. We do that here all the time. This headline is just petty. The article was.. heavy handed and simplistic…
/r/MensRights24/06/10 03:28 AM
2

I work a shit job right now while taking a break from college. I can't afford a $100 air conditioner.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 04:06 PM
2

See, here's where that divide you were talking about earlier comes into play again. I have no interest in children. The part of men's rights concerned with fathers having access to their children, while i recognize it's importance to many and the movement itself, bores me to absolute death. I've decided to live a child free life. I've never had sex without a condom, I encourage girlfriends to using birth control pills on top of that, and as soon as I get a decent health care plan, it's vasectomy…
/r/MensRights16/06/10 04:01 PM
2

I was making a parallel. In gaining equal rights to parenting, we should also gain equal rights from parenting.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 03:20 PM
1

I didn't say they weren't. But in freedom of religion, we also gain freedom from religion.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 03:04 PM
2

It is not your body so by having sex, you are excepting responsibility for any future outcome Does this not sound EXACTLY like what people say when speaking out against female abortion? "If you don't want kids, don't have sex." And I said I have no interest pretending to know what future generations will do once we have true equality. I said the proposition of equality is far more important than any negative implications that you may dream up. I'm not saying that they are badly thought out, I'm …
/r/MensRights16/06/10 02:07 PM
-1

You're right, we have. And we shouldn't have.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 05:14 AM
1

There are many people with one parent now. We can't, nor should we, legislate that there be two involved parents.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 05:02 AM
0

The implications, as you have all but said, would be uninformed conjecture. I kind of agree with you, but what were the implications of when women started working? House costs doubled because there were two incomes, children got less attention, and so on. But little of that matters because it was right.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 03:50 AM
3

It's still a matter of equality. Women have an opt out, men do not. There's no proof that crime would skyrocket. You can make a good sounding argument for it, no doubt. On the surface it would sort of make sense where you're coming from. There is simple, and then there is right. Equality is right.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 03:35 AM
1

Right, the parent's responsibility. Not the district attorney's.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 03:19 AM
1

No one thinks it's right for that woman to get off as light of a sentence as she did. But no one wants this man outside of jail. Why does this have to be about all white males?
/r/MensRights16/06/10 03:05 AM
-1

You said we live by some imagined rules. I said I did not. I am included in we. Ask your dumb self if calling women cunts really helps our cause or makes us out to look like the misogynists they all believe us to be. Hyperbole does not help anyone. The facts will prevail without ridiculous claims such as a "feminist dystopia."
/r/MensRights16/06/10 02:58 AM
5

I'm not living in accordance to women's rules. And I'm not worried about "cunts" pretending to spread misinformation.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 02:43 AM
-9

We are living in feminist dystopia, seriously, you are goddamn right not trusting a random guy on the net, or I could even be a random cunt in disguise spreading disinformation. You live in a paranoid delusion.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 02:36 AM
6

I'm glad you made the right decision, kloo. Good job.
/r/MensRights14/06/10 02:32 AM
17

You weren't (for most) until you starting banning people. Don't play the victim here.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 02:54 PM
3

Again, the T word comes out because I disagree. Which is exactly where this whole thing started, people say trolling because they just can't understand where someone else comes from. They(you) say someone is a troll because they disagree. It is a label meant to disarm and make one's point moot. If you want to discuss it to death, go for it. I did not stop anyone from doing so. I wanted to believe in a /r/mensrights that didn't resort to a lynch mob off of little to no evidence. So I plead my cas…
/r/MensRights13/06/10 07:02 AM
5

I said I don't believe it's an issue. How is this so hard to understand? I didn't advocate that people who did believe it was an issue were to be banned. I didn't say that those who thought it were a legitimate issue were not men's rights advocates. I just said maybe hearsay is beneath us as a group. But, still, you'd rather me be banned than say that.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:50 AM
5

You seem to not know what "trolling" means. Do you honestly think that trolling means somebody disagreeing with you? You poor thing.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:46 AM
4

I was saying there's no real issue here. If you want to disagree, you are more than welcome. If you want to ban people for thinking that, then, well... I don't know how to describe it without using awfully colorful language. Childish? Fascism? Cannot deal with the fact that other people think differently than you so you must silence them so you are never challenged in your life?
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:45 AM
0

You do know that nobody is going to join this subreddit, right? Why hold the conversation about a subreddit completely away in a separate subreddit? As of 7 hours, you have 6 subscribers. I'm one of them, and even I believe it will fail.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:42 AM
6

No more what?
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:35 AM
4

To not immediately cry someone as a murderer without any authentic evidence is a sad state to live in, you are right. To this day, there is no real affirmation that she has murdered anyone. Don't we have several posts a week about people being unjustly accused of rape? I feel the same way about murder, regardless the gender. So I should totally be banned for that.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:34 AM
4

I'm sorry if I require real evidence. It's a sickness, I know.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:28 AM
7

Still a shaming tactic. I totes have a dick.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:27 AM
6

I'm a dude. To claim I am a woman because I disagree with an issue is a shaming tactic. And thus worthy of banning these days.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 06:19 AM
11

But someone who disagrees with you on minor issues is not a misandrist, and often people call someone else a troll just for simple dissent.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 01:22 AM
12

I did bring up an actual issue in meta. I've been the only one, so far. And it was directed specifically to you. But that's beside the point. You brought this up in MR. You did something that many, many people disagree with. Were they supposed to not talk about it? Right now on upvotes/downvotes its 60/55. Now, we can't just use those for for/against, but it seems like you've completely divided this subreddit by people for open discussion and people for banning those with differing opinions. And…
/r/MensRights13/06/10 12:47 AM
13

But you started the game by whacking in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 12:28 AM
4

Wait, what? That makes no sense. EDIT: And requiring evidence before blaming someone for murder is hardly a "male shaming tactic."
/r/MensRights13/06/10 12:14 AM
3

I was just pointing it out. I didn't know if your downvotes and my upvotes had any power to sway your temperament to try and make my points invalid with the dismissive "troll" label.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 12:13 AM
7

Also, I was not the one downvoting you. Up until a point, I thought we were having a decent discussion.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 11:19 PM
6

UGH. Seriously? "Sources close to" is not evidence. That's just hearsay. And I'm sorry to have wasted all this time with someone who I thought might be able to have a rational discussion without yelling "troll." Again, I am disappointed.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 11:14 PM
9

I suggested that it wasn't an issue, you are right. And if people wanted to describe to argue about why it was, great. But instead it became about me being a troll. I will continue to voice my opinion on whether /r/mensrights should deal with a given topic. Sometimes people post pick up tips like we are Maxim magazine, or venomous woman hating rants. I also discourage those. But that does NOT make me a troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 11:06 PM
8

Easily: I made this comment when a thread basically turned into a virtual lynch mob for Gary Coleman's wife. Then tomek77 posted this popular piece using my comment basically word for word to use as an example of feminist trolls (which, I hope you can agree I am not one.) It was his inspiration for creating his circlejerk /r/malestudies. If needed I can provide dozens of other examples where I was not only called troll, but feminist, woman, and mangina. But hopefully that won't be necessary beca…
/r/MensRights12/06/10 10:59 PM
12

Oh, did /r/mensrights have a time when every time someone commented with an unpopular opinion people wouldn't immediately yell "TROLL?" Because every time I say something against someone else here, that's their immediate response. I'd like to have been here during that time. I really think people are starting to play the victim. I really don't believe these people are trolling. I don't know, I could be wrong. But I'd rather be wrong than extinguish dissent.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 10:37 PM
13

Actually, that was the force behind the creation of /r/malestudies, to have a place to post without having their views challenged by people who disagree on very minor points, but otherwise on the same side. Or as you have decided to call them, "trolls." And then this was to remain the one that valued an open debate, in contrast. But now look at what has happened. Very disappointing.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 10:10 PM
12

What's happening is you can't comment against the grain because people will be afraid of being called a troll and be banned for it. So it's become a point of agreeing with everything, or be called a troll and kicked out. So then what's the point of discussion if we are all just going to agree? We don't even need a comment section anymore.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 09:37 PM
13

once word gets out that you can comment here again. Isn't that the opposite of what's happening here, though?
/r/MensRights12/06/10 08:21 PM
9

People say the same thing about me.. they call it "concern troll." But I personally would like to believe that we can, as a movement and a way of thinking in terms of Men's Rights, can argue and discuss amongst ourselves about what should be considered a men's rights issue or not. There are those of us who believe we can hold ourselves to a higher standard than "bitter, angry men." There is no reason to believe these people are lying.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 08:14 PM
12

Yes, because maybe actual MRAs believe in discussion and not banhammering, and want to downvote those who want to ban. I really don't believe in such things as downvote brigades. That's just... paranoid.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 06:17 PM
40

MensRights 8,875 readers For men and supporters of men: discuss the comparative treatment of men and women in the media (news and entertainment) and in the law, especially concerning sexual harassment, sexual assault, domestic violence, and divorce. Diverging viewpoints are welcome. Thought-provoking posts are encouraged.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 06:15 PM
20

Chasing off people who believe in our cause cannot be described as an "epic win."
/r/MensRights12/06/10 06:04 PM
7

Upvoted for the great tool link, not for believing there is a downvote brigade conspiracy.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 06:02 PM
26

This is what I've long warned against. This is horrendous. I thought /r/malestudies was created because people cannot handle having their views challenged.. now it's happening here. Just because I've asked people not to hate on women here I have repeatedly been called a feminist plant troll. I was PREEMPTIVELY banned from /r/malestudies. How long till I am banned here too for not agreeing with the extreme?
/r/MensRights12/06/10 06:01 PM
1

Where does this correlation between the rise of feminism and the arrested development of men come from? I don't see them having anything to do with each other.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 02:53 AM
1

But, here's the thing you can't seem to get. I'm not ticked off at life. I love my life. I love Reddit. That's why I am abusive towards people (like you) who want to make it their crybaby livejournal. And I'm not resorting to cheap, middle school, uninformed insults (like you). I use the information given to me. Really, I skimmed your life story here. I have no interest in you. You are a petulant child. You have resorted to troll behavior, not me. I was completely done with our exchange when I w…
/r/MensRights08/06/10 07:18 PM
2

the phrase, "it's lonely at the top" is very true. While I've always been social as a co-worker, my circle of friends has shrunk as I can't hang with my co-workers anymore, and my friends have gotten married and moved all over the planet. Your words. You don't have to lie to impress me. But you are just assuming that because I leave negative comments I must be some miserable bastard. But you don't see the buckets of upvotes I give. You, of course, don't see the rich (occasionally excessive) soci…
/r/MensRights08/06/10 04:34 PM
2

You really are obsessed with me, aren't you? You having nothing to do but go through every comment I've made and take them all out of context. You (self-admittedly) have no friends, and soon no family, and you having nothing but your hate for me? Poor guy.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 03:25 PM
2

That wasn't a family member. For some reason I cannot fathom, just about every single time a soldier dies someone posts that nonsense. It's like posting every time a person who works at a sewage treatment plant comes home stinking. Being negative is not trolling.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 02:33 PM
1

Truthfully, that was me being a dick. He got on my nerves, I'll admit this. But this was not in /r/mensrights. This was not on any important topic. That was on him using reddit as a crybaby livejournal. A personal pet peeve of mine. I say many mean things to those who use reddit like a crybaby livejournal. Why don't we start at the beginning of that thread instead of out of context selection? Mind you, I may still come out as an asshole, but you can see where I was goaded me into saying such thi…
/r/MensRights08/06/10 04:48 AM
2

After approaching Aaron, the woman, who remains unnamed to further develop her dual role as predator and plaything, is encouraged to take Aaron to a private room. That character's name was Destiny, wasn't it? This person is trying way too hard to ferret out meaning where there is none. But yeah, that scene made me kind of mad.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 03:34 AM
1

Wow, you guys are obsessed with silencing and bullying users into leaving because they do no agree with you. It's quite sad you can't hold a conversation with someone on points of merit and instead go directly towards name calling. Sucks to have a world view so shakey and fragile that you can't accept that others may think differently than you. Why are you so threatened by debate?
/r/MensRights08/06/10 02:03 AM
0

But most importantly, not a place for difference of opinions.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 04:37 PM
4

So this is a place for bruised men to sit and lick their wounds? Not to bring to light issues that affect them and right wrongs?
/r/MensRights07/06/10 07:06 AM
2

You can't be serious. Calling people who disagree with you on a very few, very small amount of issues women? I can't believe I'm the one being accused of trolling here. Go have fun on your moderated circlejerk, where no one will ever having a different opinion, and you can be indoctrinated to your hearts desire without being challenged. I won't miss you in /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 05:57 AM
1

then fuck off. And that's the attitude that is going to keep MRAs a laughing stock of the intellectual world. We can make a difference, but not while acting like shitheads.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 05:51 AM
2

I have been called troll/feminist/and even a fucking woman several times because I do not agree with some things said in here. I'm sick of it.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 05:47 AM
7

Same here. I never had any plans to join a subreddit by people who cannot hold a simple discussion without yelling troll or asking for bans. It's going to be a spectacular failure. Let's watch!
/r/MensRights07/06/10 12:40 AM
10

This is just disgusting. You're calling out others on "shaming tactics"? Really? You are trying to make my opinion worthless by calling me a troll. Saying we should focus on REAL issues for Men's Rights, and not resort to being a He Man Woman Haters club is not a straw man arguement. But it's obvious you have no intention of debate. Just dismissive name calling. Again, you are a blight on the movement.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 06:53 PM
8

Jesus Christ, I'm so sick of this. Everytime anyone says anything against the grain, they are a troll. That's just fucking bullshit. It's just a way to mock other people's opinions without using rationality. Trying to make someone's point moot by pretending they are faking. I am not a fucking feminist. And you are a disgrace to both Men's Rights and any rational person who wants a discussion rather than a lynching.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 06:19 PM
9

I'm not trolling. I believe firmly in Men's Rights. And I don't believe that those who do not fall in line with every fringe of the movement should have to unsubscribe. Can we as a group not take dissenting opinions? There is zero evidence she killed her husband. Zero.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 06:06 PM
6

I have a rule: if a headline ends in a question mark, then the answer is always NO. If there was any proof whatsoever, then it would just read "Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife." Secondly... come on, guys. I hate to repeat myself over and over and over, but this is Men's Rights, not the He Man Woman Haters Club. Do we really have to take every opportunity to paint a woman as evil? Are we really that eager to show that women are bad that we have to do it one at a time? Once again, I am disappointed …
/r/MensRights05/06/10 03:49 PM
6

This has what to do with Men's Rights? Australian schools has still less female violence than male violence, but slightly up than what it was before? Shouldn't this be celebrated as a step towards equality?
/r/MensRights01/06/10 01:09 AM
2

A person with a vagina.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:50 PM
1

Again? How many accounts does this one cuntnugget have to keep submitting and upvoting his own submissions? This is just pathetic. As is this manhood academy website.
/r/MensRights05/05/10 05:08 PM
-1

Ugh, this shit again?
/r/MensRights05/05/10 03:28 PM
2

Amazingly dumb. This website is a disgrace.
/r/MensRights04/05/10 06:05 AM
2

How many times do I have to say this? This is MensRights, not He-Man-Woman-Haters-Club.
/r/MensRights01/05/10 06:49 AM
-4

What the fuck is this doing here? Is there a /r/humaninterest or something this would be better suited to?
/r/MensRights30/04/10 07:01 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/againstcircumcision
/r/MensRights24/04/10 05:11 PM
1

/r/MensRights is not Maxim magazine. This belongs in http://www.reddit.com/r/seduction .
/r/MensRights24/04/10 05:03 PM
0

Read the links to the REAL news stories he peppered through his bile filled rant. You'll see.
/r/MensRights23/04/10 11:06 PM
1

"Don't talk to people, shoot them instead," and "It's fine to shoot people in the head because traitors deserve it," Yeah... this guy lost his goddamn mind. I don't like the idea of thought police arresting this guy before he hurt someone (which seemed absolutely inevitable), but to arrest him for crimes he actually did commit including having an illegal firing range in his house and illegal weaponry seems just fine to me. Not every time a woman is scared of her husband and calls the cops is a c…
/r/MensRights23/04/10 10:38 PM
3

...are you serious?
/r/MensRights16/04/10 08:35 PM
7

Whoever wrote this is a fucking idiot. Telling an asshat to shut up on a forum when he's acting like an asshat is not in any way opposing the First Amendment. And under the First Amendment they have a right to say mock and vilify an idiotic opinion just as much as the asshat has the right to that opinion. Banning people being a douche on a forum is also not a strike against free speech. What a bunch of shit.
/r/MensRights16/04/10 07:02 PM
5

If a headline ends in a question mark, the answer is always no.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 04:09 AM
4

Awesome. Thanks for using one of my keywords (in this case: "mangina") that lets me know that I don't need to take anything you say seriously. It's pretty much the Men's Rights version of reducto ad hitlerum, in that anyone who pulls out this card is obviously not playing with the full deck.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 06:54 PM
1

Is that what this subreddit is now? Group therapy? That is not what I signed up for. I believe in the rights of men, not in crying on eachother's shoulders.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 05:40 PM
1

I have respect for both men and women. Not for bitter, whiny, insipid fucks who want to nothing more than to tear down women in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 05:39 PM
2

....good?
/r/MensRights19/03/10 05:02 PM
1

Yes, and every time a woman farts, it makes all women stink. Commencing eye rolling.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:33 PM
9

Things that are not men's rights issues: your ex was / is a bitch. you perceive feminists to act a certain way that gets on your nerves. really any way you perceive any women acting. being a bitter old fuck who just comes here to bitch about women.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 06:27 AM
1

Yes, this is /r/mensrights, not /r/hemanwomanhatersclub.
/r/MensRights15/03/10 06:17 AM
4

Sometimes guys are intrusive and creepy. It happens. If some guy came over and started talking to me when I'm trying to read, I would think the same thing. It's rude too.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 05:21 AM
2

Ok.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:28 PM
0

Probably in the same place you started: with your head up your own ass.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 09:13 PM
0

This is not the correct subreddit for this. This is r/mensrights, not r/imuncomfortablewithdumbthings
/r/MensRights13/02/10 09:00 PM
3

This is a subreddit for Men's Rights. This is not Maxim magazine. Also, anytime anyone says anything about women as a whole or men as a whole, they are full of shit.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 07:25 PM
8

This is not the He Man Woman Hater's Club. This subreddit is for men's rights. And one woman says something stupid is not indicative of a whole gender, either.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 07:20 PM
-1

Attacking you? You really believe that you're this heroic crusader, and that anyone with a differing opinion is evil horrific people? They are people trying to do what is right. Stop demonizing them. But since you seem to think that someone having an opinion that varies from your own equates to a direct attack on you, I may as well oblige you. I remember you from before. I dared point out the disgusting about of misogyny around MensRights here and you started talking the same nonsense, and then …
/r/MensRights26/01/10 01:20 AM
-1

False rape claim activists: only report the false rape claim, not the news of an actual rape.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 04:54 PM
3

Not helpful.
/r/MensRights19/01/10 01:40 AM
0

This has so much to do with the rights of men, you guys! There's not a single bit of misogyny in here, no sir.... Anybody looking for a case against men's rights advocates by pointing out their misogyny would have to look no further than all the comments here. Good job for putting the movement back and making us all look bad.
/r/MensRights18/01/10 07:17 AM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a9xo3/dear_mensrights_if_we_want_to_be_taken_seriously/c0gj78l I remember this comment got upvoted to around 10 before downvoted down to -1.
/r/MensRights20/12/09 06:42 AM
4

I still see a lot of misogyny about. I get horribly downvoted for saying things along the lines of maybe we shouldn't compare feminists to nazis. But there is less of the hyperbole. It's still there, but in less number. We still can't be taken seriously as a movement till it's weeded out.
/r/MensRights20/12/09 06:08 AM
0

If you define being a man as being virtuous, tough, and etc then you're pretty much saying that those without those characteristics are not men. Also, you are trying to say being virtuous and whatnot is what separates us from women. Either way it is insulting. I don't find this kind of talk constructive. Just divisive.
/r/MensRights11/12/09 04:45 AM
2

See, I almost think you are joking here. Calling a men's right advocate a feminazi because he doesn't think the term feminazi is helpful.
/r/MensRights01/12/09 08:36 PM
1

Also, it may be time to drop the term feminazi. Comparing anybody to Nazis is disgusting. But sadly no one will hear our cries of reason. Men's Rights is full of misogynists who want to hide behind false outrage and whipped up controversy.
/r/MensRights01/12/09 05:25 PM
2

In the end they'll come up with a much catchier name, i'm sure. Hopefully they won't go so far as to compare us with Nazis, because what kind of civilized people would do that?
/r/MensRights16/11/09 03:00 AM
6

I see just as much hateful speech on this side as the other. Since they have the term feminazi seems only fair.
/r/MensRights16/11/09 02:11 AM
5

Can't you two just get an IM and whine this out amongst yourselves? Do you really need to publicly air your shame?
/r/MensRights15/11/09 12:16 AM
6

Nice temper tantrum there, sport. Maybe this place will start concerning itself more with Men's Rights now instead of throwing hissy fits about the way women act. I invite all the women haters who want to badmouth females all day long to unsubscribe as well. Maybe make a new subreddit: r/HeManWomanHatersClub or something.
/r/MensRights07/10/09 04:04 AM
-6

Calling anyone who doesn't agree with you biased hypocrites? Really? Wow, this is why i prefer anti-circumcision stories to stay in their own subreddits. If you don't agree with their dogma, then you are barbaric, evil, a misandrist, a shit-head, a sick bastard (i'm crawling through my old responses, you get the idea). Who's biased again?
/r/MensRights19/09/09 12:39 PM
8

Did i point to you? Did i say you were responsible for every ill this reddit faces? As a student and a poster (see, prefacing your points with this is pointless no matter what titles you use) I see plenty of women hating here. I'm not alone in this. Demonizing women does not help anyone.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 10:18 PM
14

Perhaps a lot of the downvotes are due to people who truly believe in Men's Rights find a lot of the women hating material in this subreddit disgusting and unhelpful. This is not the He Man Woman Hater's Club. This is not the Anti-feminist club. This is about RIGHTS. A lot of stuff that immediately starts out with the words "feminazi" or "mangina" needs to be weeded out to encourage intelligent discourse.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 08:51 PM
0

Got me there, guy! I guess i better fucking kill myself. Love that hypocrisy all day long, fella. In the meantime, who gives two fucks? I commented on a story, and so you dig through my history and had to personally attack me. Golly, you got me beat. Hands down, you are the better man.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 10:49 PM
1

Yeah, i'm sure i couldn't crawl through all your comments and find two that contradict each other. And labeling anyone who doesn't step in line with your thoughts on circumcision as a misandrist is hardly helpful either.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 03:34 PM
1

This type of hyperbole really doesn't add anything of substance to the debate. Just fanning the flames.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 06:13 AM
1

Behind every great ___, you will find ____. Fill in to better suit your needs, but that doesn't make any of them true. In fact, i call bullshit on every instance of the phrase i've ever come across.
/r/MensRights18/06/09 02:13 PM
5

no, if you ever want me to take you seriously on a serious issue, and you refer to people who have a different point of view as yourself as "manginas", well, ok yes i probably will go away and stop listening to you.
/r/MensRights03/06/09 09:08 PM
-2

i stopped reading at the word "mangina."
/r/MensRights03/06/09 08:51 AM
-1

actually, it did have a very long history of that.. but with the anti-circumcision subreddits popping up, it all but disappeared. i hadn't had to suffer the sight of any of this for months on end, until today.
/r/MensRights03/06/09 08:39 AM
-1

....please?
/r/MensRights03/06/09 08:30 AM
-7

please please please please please please please discuss this at all the lengths you want within the anti-circumcision subreddits. and please leave the rest of us alone. please. i don't know what else to do but just beg at this point. please!
/r/MensRights03/06/09 08:07 AM
-4

i hadn't really considered it before, but " now man up and stop whining" succinctly sums up about every comment i've ever made on any subject. i quite like that.
/r/MensRights03/06/09 07:48 AM
-14

Ugh it's been a while since i saw this nonsense on here i thought we got rid of it. Please post your anti-circumcision content in anti-circumcision subreddits, and leave men's rights alone. You fully have the right to not have your child circumcised, so it doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights03/06/09 05:56 AM
3

I can't tell if you think this article is full of shit, or men in general are full of shit.
/r/MensRights30/05/09 11:19 PM
1

Why can't surgeries be held at GOLF CLUBS? are you fucking kidding me?
/r/MensRights30/05/09 11:15 PM
5

Wait, was that it? "Men are simple creatures who want nothing more than sex. Why don't women understand that?" This was more damaging to men than anything he was trying to refute, which i'm still a little unclear on.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 08:06 PM
3

To tell the truth, i have never once trusted a woman who said she's on the pill. I have always, always, (yes, really, ALWAYS) used a condom. If men can be considered lazy, women can be considered liars. If i weren't such a poor college student cliche, i'd get a vasectomy just to be sure.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 04:29 PM
2

OK, damnit. MensRights gets mad at ads that depict men in ways that humiliate or make them submissive under women, and now there are ads that in their own way celebrate overt masculinity, and MensRights gets angry at that too?
/r/MensRights04/05/09 02:22 AM
3

So? The thing i like about Lily Allen is her bratty lyrics and attitude. She's being completely honest here, and it corresponds with what she says in her songs. I've broken up with girls for worse reasons than that. It seems i have to repeat this more and more lately: This is MensRights, not the He-Man Woman Haters Club.
/r/MensRights03/05/09 08:32 PM
2

if this were two men or two women fighting in the pictures, would you care? i fear we might be getting just as touchy as the other side. don't battle pointless outrage with pointless outrage.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 06:54 PM
2

this was clearly written by someone wearing a tin foil hat.
/r/MensRights06/04/09 02:32 PM
2

i won't bother debating you on the issue, mainly because you have obviously spent every damn waking moment of your life obsessing over something so damn trivial, while i have been flat out living mine. even if i had a list of pros for circumcision, backed by scientists and doctors, you'd scoff and call it all lies. don't lie, you'd deny the sun was hot to prove your point. i frankly love my circumcised penis. and babies don't have freaking rights. its their parents that get them immunized (which…
/r/MensRights27/03/09 12:19 AM
-4

could you nutjobs please please please take your anti-circumcision crap elsewhere? like your own subreddit or something?
/r/MensRights26/03/09 11:39 PM
3

why is this in mens rights?
/r/MensRights05/02/09 03:41 PM
1

no.
/r/MensRights14/01/09 09:55 PM
4

this article doesn't seem opposed to sexism so much as opposed to sex in general.
/r/MensRights11/12/08 08:04 PM
5

i'm normally not much in the way of commenting, and i do agree that marriage is a losing prospect for men, but this article is extremely hateful. its so full of wretched bile that i went to a reverse dictionary to find a word that means "full of bile." it gave me "splenetic."
/r/MensRights10/12/08 05:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter