Hahahahahah "Guys I'm militantly misogynistic and anti feminist but the women I know never tell me they are feminist! Therefore my experience overrides all evidence" You dumb fucks really are as stupid as they come, aren't you?😂
Also, as always, you are LITERALLY. FACTUALLY. 100% WRONG https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/
You don't give the slightest shit about men's rights all you care about is complaining about feminism. Any feminist who complains as much about men's rights and men as you do about feminism and women would be a misandrist. There's a lot of them. A substantial minority of feminists being misandric doesn't mean feminism is, any more than you morons mean that men's rights is misogynistic. There's absolutely nothing about advocating for men's rights that is misogynistic. There is EVERYTHING about th…
LOL Man, the fact that I would even HAVE to explain it to you is proof that you've got so many brain worms to make the explanation worthless. So just remeber what I've said. Every. Single. Person. That encounters your bullshit on this subreddit recognizes that you hate women. You aren't being slick. You aren't successfully hiding it. All you are doing is jerking yourself off with a bunch of other bitter weirdos and pretending that no one can see through your clever facade.
Hahahahaha Thank you for conclusively proving that it's every single one of you bitter fucks. Know this: when literally any third party person looks in on this sub and they see you posting here they know you for the bitter misogynistic dipshit that you are. And yeah, you fucking moron, totally likely that I named my self MixieDAD just as an elaborate ploy to convince you I'm a man.
Your career. You made FAR less than me at this point in your career, if you weren't lying about being an engineer. Given how gob smacked you are by a pretty run of the mill take home for someone working in big tech.
Oh my fucking GOD. Like I know you are as thick as a brick but it's seriously unbelievable you still can't wrap your head around this. The entire point is that it's an obviously made up position. The entire point I was making is that anyone can be any kind of position if you have some rinky dink business, like mine. If I were going to lie I wouldn't flat out say, from the very beginning, that my business doesn't pay the bills. And you KNOW that. I've been waffling over the "stupid vs lying" opti…
Yeah I told you I was a made-up position at a business that I own and operate you f** idiot. In the very first time I mentioned it I said that it didn't pay the bills you illiterate chimpanzee.
Hahaha you opened with "c level executive" you brain dead moron. If I were going to lie I would have started there. Pretended my business was wildly successful or something. I didn't. I flat out said my "business" is a hobby that doesn't pay the bills. Where we are at is that you apparently think that a 200k contribution at a big tech company is in any way unusual. So again you are either an ignorant moron or you're just lying.
Bahahah and why would I pick what I did if I were just trying to make it believable. Why not claim I'm a surgeon and make $500k a year? The very fact that you don't understand how reasonable my level of compensation is demonstrates YOUR lack of familiarity with this world entirely.You couldn't figure out I was in software despite me mentioning things like de morgan's law. You think being in fin tech software means my work at ALL intersects with things like "k 1 forms". And the fact that you thin…
Notice how you can't answer the question. If I were lying WHY wouldn't I lie and say I make over $500k? Like, I know you are a dumbass, but you're a least smart enough to figure out how little sense it would make for me to lie about this, but not lie about making over 500 So it's pretty easy to conclude you know I'm telling the truth, but you are lying about thinking I'm lying. Which is just.... really really sad.
This is so SO pathetic. If I were lying WHY wouldn't I lie and say I make over $500k?? We both know I'm telling the truth, but you are such a sniveling little cretin with so little going for him that you seriously can't handle the fact that you didn't make as much as me at my age.
Dividends have multiple meanings you clown. You not being specific to which you were referring to doesn't mean I don't know what they are. The majority of my compensation comes through dividends.
Yeah, because your ego is literally too pathetically fragile to handle the fact that I'm making fare more at this point in my career than you were. It's sad.
Yeah, notice how that says the AVERAGE salary? I don't make an average salary. That number also specifically doesn't include dividends. I also don't write business logic you absolute goon. I don't need to know anything about finance.
hahahahaha You are so DESPERATE man. You really really can't stand the fact that Im making far more than you did at my age, can you? If I were going to make up a salary, why wouldn't I make up one that's higher than what you claimed, you idiot? I've already admitted I don't make over $500k. Here's a clue dipshit: FIN TECH SOFTWARE
unless I'm sitting down to dinner with Elon and Bezos I'm at the ELITE level. L M A O You were behind were I am now when you were this age and you know it. You've had a normal career trajectory and think you're hot shit for it but you're just a spreadsheet clown. most people will never get there and being on the workaday engineering track isn't going to take you there. lol we've got pay transparency--I know exactly where this track can take me.
I do Well congratulations buddy!! I don't have any the data to measure our dicks more precisely. you have to qualify "for your age" it doesn't mean shit. Oh really? So you think a 65 year old with a 2 million stock portfolio is more impressive than a 20 year old with a 1 million stock portfolio? We both know how stupid that is. But if that's the laurels you wish to lie upon, congratulations. If you aren't lying you do make more than me after being in the industry 4 times as long. *golf clap*
If you had to leave the sector to make money you were never any good. THAT'S where you failed out, not in college. knowing I'm more successful than you are, yet calling ME average LOL you were the one bringing up "average." Yes, genius, unless you are making over 500k you are significantly closer to average for your age than I am, and I don't have to metrics to get more granular than that.
hahahahahaha Bro, you are closer to average than I am for our respective ages and you know it. I'm making FAR more than you were at my age. Especially considering according to you you failed out of engineering.
Hahahahaha So to translate: you know if you make more than me it's a result of being farther into a career, and not a result of any actual success. Wow dude, I bet your car is nicer than mine too. Have you picked out your mid life crisis ride?
Why are you spewing 4chan memes at the age of 39? As I've already told you I'm not going to bet without it being career-length adjusted. Also I'm not in finance, and I don't have an accountant, so IDK how you'd want me to even prove you wrong.
No shit. I'm well above that at my age bracket. By 39 the 99th percentile jumps to $500k If you're making over that, congratulations. You're definitely more successful than you seem based on how insecure you are.
No, I'm not taking that up. As I've repeatedly pointed out you're a middle aged man 15+ years into a career. From the age of 30 to 35 the 99th percentile of income jumps from 200K to 400k. You're flexing about a mediocre peak by trying to compare that to someone 4 years into a career. So there you go, if that's the victory you want to take "I make more 15+ years into a career than someone 4 years into a career" you can take it. I still doubt it, but I'm not willing to do the accounting to find o…
You're barely in your 30s. Aka you're like 39. Aka, yes, idiot, you're a middle aged man. I never called you a boomer. Also L M F A O If you're trying to include dividends and distributions that were granted from positions other than your current one then NO SHIT you're going to make more, considering you've had three times as long in the industry to build them up.
I don't have to tell people I'm A level then brag about being some jerk off cubicle farm engineer. LOL no you have to tell people you're C Level, and then obsess over someone making fun of you for bragging about that. I'm in my 30's Barely. Obviously. I absolutely make more than you adjusting for any metric you want. You say, based on zero evidence. I know you feel like you have to have this, but it'd be better to just accept how unimpressive your job is. Do you have a cubicle yes or no? Nope! B…
Man you're really doubling down on the racism angle, aren't you? Really aren't doing anything to deflect the fact that I'm spot on with the fact that you're a middle aged divorcee. Which one of these is you? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3fQnArW0AIpUb1.jpg Your insecure cubicle farm ass told me I couldn't get a job breaking rocks when the fact of the matter is I make at least double what you do L M A O Holy shit man. You are literally so insecure that you took a basic jab at your intelligence and…
Bahahaha you can't even help but RADIATE your insecurity, can you? I'm unmarried, child free, and have zero plans to change either of those. You're the middle aged divorcee who has turned the fact that you were a failure of a husband into a crusade against feminism. LOL you aren't fooling anyone with "elite level money," Mike. You're a middle aged man in a leadership position at a small business. That's not "elite" of ANYTHING. That's the basic expectation for a middle aged professional. Repeate…
Bro you're a middle aged man in a leadership position in some jerk off small business. It's not impressive. It's not particularly successful and its absolutely hilarious that you tried to whip out a dick measuring contest about it. A reference my "small business" precisely BECAUSE it is is small and unimportant. That is the POINT you drooling moron. I'm making fun of you by comparing your claim to my unimpressive "leadership" qualifications. You're literally too stupid to even understand when so…
It's really fucking sad that all you have is "a level" when that was literally a parody of how stupid you sound bragging about being a c level executive in the first place. You are lying, just like you lied about 47 states having made to penetrate being the only form of rape. If someone is dming you have you considered the fact that it could be because you're transparently just a lying git?
Lmao you are telling on yourself if you're not lying.. Which you probably are. The decent engineers make the big bucks right where they are. They don't have to fail out to middle management.
Why the fuck would I? You're the spreadsheet bitch not me. What a pathetic fallback. "Y-yeah.. Well.. I bet YOU don't even know what De Morgan's law is. Ha! Got him" Sad man. Sad.
Man you just keep digging your hole even deeper don't you? The fact that you think I would even need to fake something as basic as an offer letter shows just how completely you are out of that realm. Here's a clue: they aren't just a word document because the offer needs to be accessible on a filing system for legal purposes. Man I don't even care that you work for a small business. That's great and I bet it comes with a lot of freedoms and chances to make impactful decisions. But maybe don't st…
I worked directly with the CTO of my last company you idiot. You don't want to see the offer letter because your business isn't important enough to even have those.
haha I'm not making fun of you for having a "c" in the title, I'm making fun of you aggrandizing your unimpressive job at a small business by abstracting your role as much as possible. I'm an engineer (there, now you know what 'eng' is). You're a spreadsheet bitch.
Yeah probably. Luckily I'm not a janitor. I've got an offer letter I could dig up but I doubt your 'c level executive' position your dad handed you was done as formally.
It's funny to me that you're not even denying that you don't know what eng is and that you're a "c level executive" of some shit-tier business no one cares about.
Man you're really not helping your case that you can't wrap your head around being mocked. You also think that merely working for a Fortune 500 company is impressive, and you don't know what eng is. Translation: dad got you a job at his local landscaping business.
Jesus Christ. You're literally too stupid to understand that I was mocking you? I dropped a level to make fun of what a pointless thing to brag about that is, not because I'm actually an a level executive of anything. The fact that you can't wrap your head around someone being at a Fortune 500 company demonstrates your own limitations more than anything. Half the people I went to college with are at Fortune 500 companies and most of the other half are getting doctorates. It's not even a high bar…
Dude you're a CFO or something. Anyone can be in a small/shitty enough business so bragging about it really doesn't say anything. I'm making fun of you dropping a title that doesn't mean anything out of context. I'm the owner operator of my 'business' but that title is just a hobby that earns me less than 1% of my fortune 500 eng position does annually. If you are actually a c-level officer of a large successful business then congratulations, but just bragging about a title is exceptionally sill…
Hahaha hahahahahah If you want to talk about improving human communication maybe you should learn to communicate in a way that doesn't involve sexually assaulting people you pea brained neanderthal.
And STILL no source. You talk about room temperature IQ but you aren't even capable of following the topic of discussion. You idiots are the most logically inept fuckers I've encountered outside of Facebook. I would be astounded if any of you could secure employment above banging rocks together.
Oh my f** God how stupid can you get? I have not denied that Mary Koss advocated for that. The claim that we are discussing is yours that Mary Koss counts and mras advocating for misogynistic things don't count, because one is the law and the other is not. That is the topic. That is the topic that you have been completely unable to provide evidence for. I have provided you the literal textual definition of rape in federal law. You have been unable to provide anything to support your claim that M…
You are the one deflecting from the fact that you don't have a source. Do I seriously need to recap this for you? You claimed that Mary Loss is different than men's rights activists advocating for misogynistic things because one is the law and the other is not. But you have been completely and utterly unable to provide a source that says that that is the law. Meanwhile I have provided a source that says that that isn't the law. I have conceded the fact that I do not know all of the state laws an…
Well you're spill about human rights sure would be inspiring if you didn't just literally complain about people having the right to not be sexually groped by strangers.
Let me get this straight you're complaining about me linking to the literal text of the law and claiming that that is not a good source for what the law is? Do you guys even read what you write?
I mean maybe you could start with you know a single example. You made a claim. It's a completely wrong claim and I provided the literal law that says you are wrong. If you are claiming that there is some other law where you are actually right, you need to provide a source for that or else I'm just going to treat you like the moron that you are
L M F A O You are literally so misogynistic you've wrapped yourself in an utter fantasy land. You seriously SERIOUSLY need to touch grass. Anyway I think this comment encapsulating sheer navel gazing irrationality of this sub, and henry blair's comment where he says the quiet part loud about actually opposing feminism because it stops him from sexually assaulting people, marks a good endpoint for this conversation Good luck with all of your divorces and perpetually blaming that on women instea…
Feminism is a *women's* movement. If it advances men's rights it does so incidentally. I'm not opposed to it but it's also not nearly enough to right the injustices men face in society and in some cases actively stands in the way of that. I want men's rights. But there can't be any space to actually discuss that online because you navel gazing morons come up and shit all over the place every single time.
"wow did you just confirm your point with a source? You should just talk completely out of your ass like me instead" You people are seriously some of the stupidest motherfuckers on reddit.
Henry Blair has flat out argued that that isn't sexual assault. He has flat out argued that groping strangers in public should be allowed. He is perfectly willing to throw male sexual assault victims under the bus so that he can continue to sexually assault women without consequence.
No, that is ONE of the qualities that defines a "sexual act." Another is mouth to genital or genital to genital contact. Then rape is defined as several scenarios under which sexual act occurs. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/920
Right so you are retreating to the position that feminism is more influential than men's rights activism? If you are retreating to that position that means you are conceding the point of intent. If feminism is anti men because individual feminists have sought misandric policy, then men's rights activism is anti women because individual MRAs have sought misogynistic policies. The scale or effectiveness of that influence doesn't change that logic at all. Frankly I think that assertion is absolutel…
Paul Elam has publicly vowed "should I be called to sit on a jury for a rape trial I vow to publicly vote not guilty, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that the charges are true" And before you go yada yada yada context context, part of my point is that you endlessly give the benefit of the doubt to men's rights figures while denying it from any feminist.
Okay do you have the slightest source for this? Because the federal law makes absolutely zero distinction between made to penetrate or otherwise. I haven't looked up every state's individual laws here but I'm pretty skeptical that 47 of them individually made exceptions to the federal law for this circumstance
Yeah 20 years ago the bouncer probably would have checked him across the face and thrown him into the street. Also since you seem far more reasonable than most people here, check out the op's response to my original comment. That kind of sentiment is what I'm talking about. He doesn't actually care the slightest bit about protecting male victims of sexual assault all he cares about is opposing feminism so he can re-implement his reactionary view of the world where it's okay to grope strangers in…
I absolutely did read what he said. He referenced a feminist who advocated for a misandric law. A law that is not in effect. Yet when men's rights activists advocate for something legally he considers it just words. It's part of the continued double standard needed to prop up these ridiculous beliefs
This is literally not the case. Rape is federally an aggregated definition. The legal definition of forcible rape is the carnal knowledge of a person forcibly and or against that person's will. There is nothing legally that says being made to penetrate is not rape.
Wow. This really is a textbook example of what I'm talking about. You lie and lie and lie about feminism being anti men because what you are really bitching about is the progress that feminism has made towards protecting women. You don't care the slightest bit about men's rights all you care about is dragging progress back 50 years to fit your reactionary misogynistic worldview.
Also here's a clue for ya. If you encountered a woman who spent 99% of their time complaining about men instead of ever actually advocating for women you'd recognize that they are just using feminism as a front for their misandric beliefs, right? Yeah that is all this sub does is complain about women without ever doing anything to actually advance the rights of men. Even the most hardcore misandric feminists have a lower ratio of bitching about men then you do bitching about women. Even utter ce…
Ahhh right when some feminist advocates for something misandric they are directly harming men but when men's rights activists advocate for something misogynistic it's "just words" It's amazing how literally every single one of your beliefs are propped up by blatant double standards. Pathetic
Yeah you're right. Feminism has actually accomplished something when all you neck beards have done is b**** and moan. Without feminists raising awareness for sexual assault what happened to me wouldn't have even been considered it. Feminism didn't prevent what happened to me but it is done far more for me than you fucking morons ever have. So really when you think about it your argument is even more ridiculous and stupid then the Tumblr feminists who claim the opposite. Because of morons like yo…
The Duluth model refers to domestic violence and applies to home settings. The Duluth model is awful but what it did is codify already existing misandry. Authority figures have always treated men as perpetrators by default. What the Duluth model did was extend that to domestic relationships. Not only does it not apply to this situation but it is an example of the result of misandry, not the cause.
Can you even hear how incredibly stupid you sound? Seriously reverse the f****** terms and you exactly have the kind of moron Tumblr feminist that you hate so much. "Being against men's rights isn't misandric. Men's rights is inherently against women. You don't care about feminism and also respect men's rights." See how utterly and completely stupid that sounds? Also for your information you disgusting neckbeard, I have personally been sexually assaulted by a woman who got away with it because s…
Has zero to do with concern trolling and everything to do with the fact that this issue is incredibly important to me. You idiots are actively detrimental to anything being done about it because of how strongly you have created an association between men's rights and bitter misogynistic morons.
I can find examples of men's rights activists saying atrocious shit about women. Does that make every problem women encounter the fault of men's rights activism? You idiots are so completely logically inept
It is absolutely hilarious that this is literally the only example you have. Every single time anything bad happens to men you blame it on feminism and then when pointed out how utterly ridiculous that is you fall back to the Duluth model even when it has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. It's pathetic
Blaming this on feminism is absolutely ridiculous. Do you think this man would have been better received before feminism? He wouldn't have. You are actively sabotaging efforts for men's rights by spending all of your energy bitching about feminism instead of actually doing the slightest bit to liberate men.
