TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MoFuckinBananas Archive

View 0 posts and 165 comments by MoFuckinBananas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Europe is your evidence. Your assumptions are incorrect.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 10:44 PM
1

I'm not MRA but no it isn't. Little kids grope each other and adults put so much power into it.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 10:44 PM
0

Homosexuals used to march with pedophiles back when the gay rights movement was happening in the 50s-70s. They decided to abandon the pedophiles and began attacking them instead. Many pro-pedophile arguments and articles were made by both gay men and women back in those days. Hysteria, paranoia, lies, slander, puritanism, anti-sexual attitudes, have led to what we have today. The pedophile is everyone's scape goat and most info on them is out right false as well as most info on child sexuality a…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 10:43 PM
8

In my home country they would have literally been kicked out and if they drew weapons would have had multiple weapons drawn on them. Is that good or bad in the grand scheme of things? You decide, but in this context it would have been perfect.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:50 PM
1

I would too, and this is the mentality we should be embracing, not the victim model.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:41 PM
1

So it is okay to touch someone without their permission in other ways? Or is it just because we live in a puritanical anti-sexual body shaming society that we get in a tizzy because a buttox or breast was touched?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:41 PM
1

Actually most people should feel at worst upset but not enough to claim there is a rape culture. being groped is not a big deal and it neve rshould be considered so unless the situation is extreme.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:39 PM
1

Raise our daughters differently. A solution both men and women can partake in.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:37 PM
1

Agreed. I don't consider myself a MRA but I like MRAs much more than feminists mainly because my initial exposure to them was people looking to treat things more logically. However I noticed as of late many seem to just want to mimic how feminists handle it except with the women getting into life ruining trouble for nonsense instead of men. The double standard is real but we do NOT want everyone to act like feminists do. It's bad for men, women, girls, and boys. I am glad to see I was upvoted in…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 07:11 AM
2

If we were raised in a society where women could be topless just as much as men it would be fine and we wouldn't have such sexual arousal at mere nudity. It would be there, but not nearly as powerful. Ironically the sexual puritanism causes excess sexual arousal to things that normally wouldn't be so arousing. Overall solid critique. Except for being upset about vulgar language and thinking refraining from sex makes him morally superior.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:29 AM
3

Nothing should be charged against the victims wishes, that's just making them a victim X2. Ah okay that was knee jerk typing, I get what you are saying. Good idea.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:52 PM
2

I feel in these situations women need to treat it like men do.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:22 PM
10

I agree the double standard is fucking absurd.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:21 PM
0

No you dumb fuck this is not child abuse. Letting kids curse is not abusive. Teaching your kids lies you believe in is not abusive. It is empowering for a child IF the point of the video was "you are human, you can say what you want and use any words you want because we love freedom" The problem was the feminists propaganda, not cursing.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:23 PM
0

I'm happy with how most people don't give two shits about the girls cursing, because in reality there is no logical reason to care, instead they focus on the real issues. Using the kids to spread incorrect messages about feminism that the kids don't understand and I bet were not actually allowed to have discussion on or anything.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:21 PM
38

Do MRAs think we should be acting like feminists and females do? That these men were molested, assaulted, and should be freaking out? Women should act the way these men do, chuckle, get her to stop, but find it funny she goes through such great lengths to touch their butts. I do not want to live in a society where men act like females currently are raised to and told to in situations like this, and often it seems MRAs want that.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:13 PM
1

Learn what rape means. Good day.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:49 AM
1

Statutory rape is, by definition, a victimless crime. A moral crime. Nothing more. No rape occurred, just conditions were met that currently people have moral problems with. I used to post in many subreddits, but have largely abandoned this account. I just sometimes log into this subreddit. I dislike both feminists and MRAs. I am not talking about rape and never was talking about rape. You just made that up.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:09 AM
1

I am not an MRA and I don't want to have sexual relations with a child. However, I do my own thinking, I don't let the media and hysterical puritanical people do it for me.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:50 AM
1

With parental guidance of course. Otherwise they can consent to nothing. Sex is not special. Get over it.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:38 AM
-3

This is the wrong route. It is not creepy if it is consensual. Simple as that. We should be treating men like we treat women in these cases and the girls like the boys. When you tell them their consent doesn't mean shit, you take away their agency and force a victim label on them because of your crappy moral system based on "sex is bad and wrong!"
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:27 PM
-2

All I read was "30 counts of sex we don't agree with so we make it illlegal" All I see in the comments here are "we don't care about the actual people involved and whether it was actually consensual, only that our moral views are shoved on anyone we deem is wrong" Humanity is sick, and it is because of this hatred of sexual activity when consensual that makes us sick. I mean, if they lived in NJ and she wasn't a gym teacher it would be legal. If anything she should be fired, that's it.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:25 PM
2

I made no assertions in my post that need citations. I already have done enough research on income discrepancies. I have read both sides and come to my own conclusion. I also never said brainwashing either in my post.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:13 PM
0

I've begun thinking men side with this kind of thinking in the hopes of getting pussy and that's it.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:21 AM
-3

For what exactly? This is a ridiculous suggestion.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:20 AM
7

You vaguely reference two studies, then link to a wiki article with 150 references and tell us "you can find both studies here". You saying "there is plenty of evidence" is not showing any evidence. 2/10 for the attempt.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:18 AM
5

My problem is the lies that these girls are having shoved in them. The pay gap is not because of sexism. The rape stat is bullshit. It has been shown here over and over. I don't care if little girls curse. If my daughter curses like a sailor I will right along with her. All I am going to teach her is where it is wise to avoid cursing (professional settings etc).
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:40 AM
1

My problem is the lies that these girls are having shoved in them. The pay gap is not because of sexism. The rape stat is bullshit. It has been shown here over and over. I don't care if little girls curse. If my daughter curses like a sailor I will right along with her. All I am going to teach her is where it is wise to avoid cursing (professional settings etc).
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:39 AM
1

My problem is the lies that these girls are having shoved in them. The pay gap is not because of sexism. The rape stat is bullshit. It has been shown here over and over. I don't care if little girls curse. If my daughter curses like a sailor I will right along with her. All I am going to teach her is where it is wise to avoid cursing (professional settings etc).
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:05 AM
3

My problem is the lies that these girls are having shoved in them. The pay gap is not because of sexism. The rape stat is bullshit. It has been shown here over and over. I don't care if little girls curse. If my daughter curses like a sailor I will right along with her. All I am going to teach her is where it is wise to avoid cursing (professional settings etc).
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:05 AM
0

Are you talking about school? Public school is not a profitable industry Super Nanny, Nanny 911, the hundreds of parenting books, and yes schools which involve millions upon millions of tax payer dollars. No, I just believe that pedophilia is wrong. I don't. Yes, it is. No, it isn't. Again, sex can have long lasting negative emotional impacts. Taking a kid to Disneyland won't. That's a social thing. There is nothing about sexual interactions themselves that causes negative emotional impacts if t…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 06:10 PM
1

However not all teachers will express extreme anger and those that do are then manipulating their position of power. This is ignoring the advances of students on the teachers they find attractive. You compared two completely different things. When girls deny my advances at a bar it is merely a mild annoyance to me. If I was a teacher who made an advance to a student who denied it it would still remain a mild annoyance and nothing more. Like I said, context, not blanket assumptions.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:27 PM
0

Please tell me why there is a multimillion dollar industry to get kids to listen to adults. Your position is one of cognitive dissonance. An adult having consensual sexual experiences with a child is NOT inherently abusing power. Otherwise you would have to argue that everything an adult does with a child in which the adult gains pleasure or happiness is the adult abusing their power. Young children, aged maybe 6 and under, trust their parents/guardians more than other children and adults. How t…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:25 PM
1

Please tell me how students obey everything the teacher says because of the academic standing. If this statement were true no student would ever misbehave. I think the important thing is finding out how the relationship formed and under what context. Are the teacher and student just really smitten with one another and the teacher made it clear either answer would not affect the student's grade? Or did the teacher hold grades or detention over the student's head? Criminal prosecution in general s…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:34 PM
2

Thank you. People need to remember young humans are incredibly capable. Childhood extension and the creation of adolescence has held them back. I am not saying make them go work at the age of eight like the old days. However I am saying allow them the benefits of modern society and give them freedom and real responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:31 PM
0

Emotional "repercussions" are ridiculously subjective. Regardless look at it this way. When two kids play with each other sexually, most rational minded people look at it as a fine thing. I gave and received oral sex with a girl when I was a preteen and so was she. It was fine, we were both fine, you have to convince me that if I was an adult or she was it was somehow innately "damaging" all of a sudden. Children don't fully understand the repercussions of literally anything they do because they…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:28 PM
2

You can legally date 7 year old girls. I mean, I don't know how the parents would react haha but it isn't illegal.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:19 PM
-1

No. They are not too young to grant consent as long as their parent/guardian approves. Just like with anything a child consents to.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:17 PM
-1

Consent is not rape. End of story.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:16 PM
-1

No, are you conflating rape with consent? Yes.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:16 PM
3

Don't forget, this new way of treating people has caused frontal lobe development to slow. Then idiots parrot an article they read about the frontal lobe and teens to say "see we need to treat them like kids!" when cross cultural analysis shows that the way adults treat teens these days is a bigger contributor to poor decision making and irresponsible teens than biology.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:15 PM
-1

Could we stop using feminist talking points? The boy seems to have consented thus it is NOT rape. Please please don't be like feminists and cloud the definition of rape. Did the boy consent? That is what matters. His perspective, not his mom's, not yours, not feminists, HIS. I mean god damn it. Same goes if this was a man and a 12 year old girl. Was she consenting and having fun? Or was the man abusing a position of authority. These things matter. Studies have revealed this.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:00 PM
3

Um, they are not pedophiles. Considering 15 year old girls are far from prepubescent. They probably aren't even hebephiles. Attraction to and consensual sexual interaction with any human is normal and healthy. Only society and idiots like you make it not so.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:51 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:51 AM
0

That's what I thought.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 12:35 AM
1

I already dismantled the "guilt was proven" argument. All that was proven was that she had sex with the guy and it is assumed she forced it, that's the assumed part because of moralistic laws.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 07:19 PM
1

Unable to tackle my arguments you resort to dismissal and insults.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 07:00 PM
0

I am defending a consensual interaction, nothing more.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 06:56 PM
-1

I am calling into question the laws because they are idiotic. Many blacks and gays were found guilty because they broke "laws" too. My statements are based on what this nation was founded on, innocent until proven guilty. Innocent of wrong doing. It isn't a back flip. You're the one playing mental gymnastics to defend someone who might possibly be wrongfully incarcerated because of morals and not actual aggression.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 06:43 PM
-2

She was found guilty on a premise that assumes guilt. How do you not grasp that? The court didn't say "let's determine if she used her power to manipulate the situation or if her power caused the boy to feel he needed to consent." No the courts said, "if we find she did something sexual with the boy, consent doesn't matter because we assume she used her power over him or her power heavily influenced him"
/r/MensRights17/01/14 06:37 PM
-1

No, you need to look up context. You are assuming she used her power without knowing the context of the situation. In every instance that one has more power than another, not necessarily. Just assuming she used her power is wrong. You're are assuming guilt and not innocence based on your personal views. You are also assuming the boy did it because she was the teacher, and he felt he needed to. Ask him, ask her separately etc.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:51 PM
-1

Then all relationships are abusive.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:13 PM
-1

Power dynamics always come into play. Is that person using their power to manipulate the situation? That's the question.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:27 PM
-4

Feminists misapply rape to fit their agenda. A consensual interaction is not rape. Simple as that. This are mid to late teens. I thought we all realized as a culture that sex is note innately bad? I will never support punishing females as bad as they do males. I will support the decriminalization of consensual activities for all gender variations.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:54 PM
-1

You can't (or shouldn't) criminalize consensual interactions. Witness tampering and intimidation are illegal anyway. The way it is now innocent people are jailed and arrested because of moral offenses. Like I said, ridiculous.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:47 PM
1

This is literally over exaggerating. Comparing yelling to fists is disingenuous. We have become a nation of people without a backbone.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:36 PM
-8

If the male doesn't want her prosecuted they are going against his wishes. Which is ridiculous since he is the "supposed" victim. As for the double standard, of course it is stupid, but we should be fighting for men to be treated like women in these cases, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:33 PM
1

That is fucking idiotic.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:43 AM
2

How about not caring about age but caring about the consent of those involved and whether it is legit consent or not. Simple.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:17 AM
1

True, good point.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:56 PM
1

It sounds more like the mother is a dumb slut who is forcing her daughter to try and claim that interactions she previously enjoyed were rape. It's funny because the law is saying that Henry used his age and power to coerce the girl into the sex (which is ridiculous given this situation) however it seems the mother is actually the one doing it.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:24 PM
1

I think it does. These laws basically say that women/girls are unable to make a complaint if there is force (the laws ban a mutually consensual interaction on the basis that some people might abuse their power), it makes sex seem like something being done to a female degrading her. The whole "taken advantage of" thing implies that females get no enjoyment out of sexual interaction. It harkens back to victorian times and feminists use it to push an agenda.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:22 PM
3

Just because he broke a prior agreement with you does not mean you can assault him and steal from him and slander him. Same goes for girls that cheat on guys. You break up with them. That's it. It was a verbal (sometimes not even, a lot of times it is assumed) agreement to have sex with only each other. Sorry, can we move past this being so serious?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:52 PM
1

I honestly don't believe that story sorry. Then again... the mom could be a frequent poster at one of the SRS subreddits sooooo
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:40 AM
1

I just hate that it was done without my consent, I mean... at least try and convince me lmao or bribe me. My brother and one cousin had it done because of Phimosis (my bro was like 7 and my cousin was 20) both wanted it done very badly because apparently Phimosis is incredibly painful. Other than that my whole family is uncut. Me, my brother, and my cousin say we have bullet bills lmao
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:22 PM
5

Awesome, glad to hear you are recovering! I notice many parents do this in ignorance. While ignorance is no excuse it can help us to forgive them, knowing they weren't doing it "because circumcised penises look better."
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:17 AM
7

I'm actually quite fine. I never thought I was a victim of MGM until a few years ago. At that point I just told my parents I completely disagree with their decision, they apologized saying they just listened to the doctor. shrugs I mean it sucked but what's done is done, like I said my sons won't have to suffer that way. How about you?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:05 AM
15

I had my foreskin forcibly removed, I remember hiding behind the couch begging to not have it done. Nope the doctor said it was "pretty much necessary". Parent made me do it. Then to top it off, I had a Q-Tip forcibly shoved up my peehole a few times the month after the surgery. Which requiring holding me down forcefully and well... shoving a Q-Tip in my peehole. I know I was a victim (though I don't define myself that way because that would have made the situation worse) it is over, done with, …
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:21 AM
2

I like how she tries to rationalize hiding information about her kids because "dem eEeEeEeEvil pedophilers!!!!" If I ever went on a date with a woman with this attitude I'd probably walk out during the date itself. Impress my ass.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 10:32 PM
8

Does the toy cause pain or damage as a feature? Yes? Then no not for kids. Otherwise, have fun.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:34 PM
1

Evolutionary psychological studies are done with cultural and ethnic bias. It's a very fluky field. How do you study the psychology of those from a time long long loooooong gone? Especially when how humans behave kinda flies in the face of what they claim. Depending on the culture of course. There is a reason a lot of shaming, punishment, and ignoring needs to be done to children in regards to sexuality and nudity to get them to conform. I mean, this is just my opinion obviously.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 05:51 PM
1

Are we not? You are basing this off a society that punishes children for expressing sexuality in any way. That looks highly upon monogamy and down upon anything else. We say abstinence is best for teens who naturally want to do it, instead of teaching them how to be safe and saying "have fun". We fight our sexually expressive and open selves in every way because of social values instilled because of religion and Victorian ideals. Sex no longer leads to children except less than 1% of the time if…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 03:07 AM
1

Sexual morality came about literally as a means of control. Sexuality for humans is closely related to sexuality for the Bonobo as I mentioned before. In fact it can be said the lack of sexual contact among humans increases violence, depression, anxiety, etc. We can live in modern society and have promiscuity. Infidelity is a silly moral idea that one possesses their partner sexually. Sure if two people agree on it fine, but people shouldn't expect it to be the norm like we do currently. Promisc…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:47 PM
1

Haha right?
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:13 AM
3

I can agree with that definitely. Besides... sexual morality was about controlling everyone, not just women. It amazes me feminists argue that.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:00 AM
2

They think having a man accused of being a rapist is not as bad as them being called a whore/slut. The shame for them is too great. It's idiotic too on their part.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:48 AM
0

I once thought that but when you look at human history promiscuity was very common (if you look at one of our closest ape relative, the Bonobo, you see sex is heavily part of their societies and even keeping peace) The nuclear family was not the default. It was the group. Hunter gatherer. There wasn't one father and mother and their kids. It was the whole village. People screwed to have a lot of kids (because most died). The commitment/money from one man wasn't needed because the whole tribe/gro…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:46 AM
6

If we lift the taboo on sex in our cultures a lot of false rape accusations will disappear. Parents raise their daughters with the idea that any sex without commitment is shameful and dirty. This flies in the face of instinct. I am not saying she isn't at fault. Regardless she is responsible for her actions. I am just talking in general. My daughters will be raised differently.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 07:44 AM
8

AKA Women can't handle the pressures of life and need to be coddled, men are supposed to be able to handle it and we must condemn those who can't. Feminists support this double standard with how they treat men vs women.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 01:31 AM
1

I must respond to that
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:38 AM
0

As well as sentient thought, abstract reasoning skills There are humans without these but we do not have the right to end their lives. the ability to live independent from the mother's body. So if one day technology exists that they can remove the fetus from the body to live artificially in a machine it will become human? It's not a person when it's still receiving the bulk of its nutrients via umbilical cord - humans don't do that. Humans eat. Some humans use feeding tubes. We can go on all nig…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:27 AM
1

Symbiotic close and often long-term interaction between two or more different biological species Incorrect - humans don't regrow brain cells, we only lose them over time. At the very least, the atoms in our brain remain the same. You are correct. Additionally, I wasn't trying to say that the consumption of excess parts makes something non-human. I was saying that a fetus has not yet crossed a threshold in the consumption of parts in order to be considered human. A fetus is literally an incomplet…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:59 AM
0

Not biologically parasitic. It isn't actually parasitic at all because a parasitic relationship is symbiotic. For a fetus to make the growth from single celled organism, to baby ready for birth, it needs approximately 8-9 pounds of material. Large amounts of water and carbon. Protein. Calcium. Smaller amounts of many other metals. The parts, are the fetus, and whatever materials it has not yet incorporated into its being yet before it is born. It's not a baby until it's undergone that process. B…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:42 AM
-1

Human DEVELOPMENT. Not humanity. It can propel itself toward becoming a human being - it is not one yet. You are playing semantics now. It is a human in an early stage of development and you have yet to provide a lick of evidence otherwise. A pile of lumber and drywall is not a house. A pile of auto parts is not a car. A caterpillar is not a butterfly. None of these have any relation to humans. Three aren't living organisms and one is an insect. You need to understand that as things age, they ch…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:05 AM
-3

To the first part - you're just parroting your own words, without actually adding anything substantive to them. Humans are not simply the sum of their parts - therefore it logically follows that unassembled human parts are not fully human yet. A fetus is not a human. It is a fetus. Dr. Keith L. Moore’s “The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology,” used in medical schools worldwide, it states: “Human development begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (s…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:45 AM
-1

bananas
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:33 AM
2

Numbers are inflated. I don't know about college aged numbers... but the numbers for minors is inflated because they often include minor-minor sexual interaction as sexual abuse. The college numbers might include any drunken sex, consensual or not, or might include crude comments said toward a female. Correct me if I am wrong.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:31 AM
-4

The fetus is a living human being in an early stage of development. Conception sees to that. Scientific fact. It has a right to life, just because it doesn't look cute or like a person doesn't mean people can just dismiss it. The fetus' right to life and the man's right to his own child trumps the women's right to expel the fetus if she doesn't want it. Personally, I think people should work toward a technology where the fetus can be removed and the father can pay for costs to keep it alive whil…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:05 AM
3

No, the "why?" is a link for you to click and it explains why it was copied lol as for your original question I have no idea, hopefully someone can explain.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:18 PM
-13

In my opinion this should override the women's rights. The man's right to his child and the child's right to live. Barring rape of course or severe risk to the mother.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:16 PM
1

That's the only fair way and I agree, even though I don't agree with abortion in general. If abortion is to be legal men should have the option to walk away.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:15 PM
8

Some women want it all. They want to be treated as equal, but they want the special privileges they got that as far as I know were fantasy and didn't even really exist outside of stories and tv.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:21 PM
1

I agree that the double standard is idiotic I wasn't arguing that. I also know the law, I was stating my disagreement with it.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:22 PM
-3

If she used her position of authority it would be clear "yeah I did it because she is the teacher". It's not consent when they do it because they feel they have to. How the boys feel is the most important fact, it is not immaterial.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:50 AM
4

This isn't pedophilia... 14 (legal in other 1st world countries), 16 (legal in other states), and 17 (also legal in other states) year old people are not attractive to actual pedophiles... unless they are non-exclusive pedophiles. This is actually normal, the problem is she was a teacher and that's a no no. The most important thing is how the guys felt when they had sex. Did they feel pressured, forced, scared, threatened, blackmailed? Then lock her up. If not, fire her and disbar her from teach…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 12:51 AM
6

You know this is kinda off topic but I once worked for a pool as maintenance and it literally destroyed every argument that women had about being neater and cleaner than men. The women's bathroom would get just as bad as the man's bathroom. Except with the added bonus of bloody tampons... even though the stalls each had a special garbage disposal for tampons on the side.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:31 PM
4

Depends on the context. There are some women who just sleep around without protection with thugs and gangsters. There are some women who made an honest mistake. Vice versa for men.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:33 AM
0

Intoxication does not mean you can't legally consent. Being passed out? Yes, but drunk and saying "yeah let's fuck!" is consent as far as the law is concerned and as long as consent is maintained the whole interaction. As for myself, if I am not drunk I shrug off drunk girls. If we are both drunk, party time.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:22 PM
12

Actually, it is silly to fear all dogs because of one nip and we teach children (or people in general) not to do that and to understand that, while dogs are animals, you can be assured most won't bite you. Also, statistically speaking... wow looking at the stats is revealing about how feminists view rapes... check this out According to the National Crime Victimization Survey, the adjusted per-capita victimization rate of rape has declined from about 2.4 per 1000 people (age 12 and above) in 1980…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 03:52 PM
2

I agreeeeeeeeeeee so much with what you have said. Especially about the convincing a female she was abused when she wasn't through shame and guilt and downright indoctrination.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 03:40 PM
1

That's assuming you can chalk that all up to abuse, though I see your point. I just don't want the same problems with how people deal with abused females be how people start treating males. Humans are resilient and with good support they can bounce back from a lot of what is deemed "irreparable damage".
/r/MensRights07/01/14 02:15 PM
-1

I just don't want men to adapt the victim mentality women often do. Men do bounce back better more often from abuse and it is because they aren't coddled and people don't necessarily treat them like damaged goods. We need to change how both men and women view sex abuse and how it affects both genders. People need to take male abuse more seriously and stop acting like female abuse is the end of the world and permanent damage is guaranteed. It isn't.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:37 AM
8

Glad to hear it, if true it sounds like back then UD's policies were written by a upper middle class white female who posts on tumblr too much and vents her frustrations through SRS here on Reddit.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:56 PM
2

I wasn't being serious, I was saying how it is today. A person's "role" is A) What they want it to be and to a lesser extent B) What the current circumstances might require, which is based more on survival or the survival of another and easily changeable when the situation ends.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 07:20 AM
3

When I was around that age, a girl and I were all about touching each other until we got caught. You don't know how hard I tried to find another girl to do it with and got rejected every singled time lmao then I found the Spice channel... then got caught... again. lol
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:30 PM
2

Once again... does anyone care about what actually happened. These people need to stop looking through their idiotic anti-sexual moral glasses. Kids do this stuff all the time and it is normal. If the boy made her do it, then yes it is bad and serious, however if they went along with it together, I ask who cares? Guess what... kids do this for all of history and they will try to do it with kids and yes even adults. It's part of sexual development. We are to lead them in a safe direction, not acc…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:51 AM
0

The role they are meant to fill is based around using sex as a tool to get what they want and not something mutually pleasurable to be shared with someone they like. An attitude actively enforced by modern day feminism.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:48 AM
4

I met a girl at the club who denied every single guy under 6'2 haha good luck to her, she wasn't a looker either. Male objectification happens but it isn't cared about. Especially when it comes to feminists.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:46 AM
1

Exactly. You can't deny it doesn't exist at all. However there is no justification for ridiculous laws. Legal action, boycott, word of mouth, these will work wonders to getting a business to see things in a less sexist light. It is not institutionalized and pretty rare. The pay discrepancy is literally mainly accounted for by the choices women make.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 05:42 AM
1

It's NJ, I'm about 25 and had relations with a 16 year old girl however I wasn't a teacher or anything it was just mutual friends so it is perfectly legal. The probation is dumb but I am fine with her being fired. They should look at the case and see if she used coercion, not assume she did because of her job. That's just me though.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:37 AM
13

So if FGM had some religious purpose these feminists would view it as "okay" in the name of religious tolerance? My fucking ass. Just because MGM has religious background does not make it okay.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:35 AM
12

A man can get an erection and a woman can get wet, both while being raped. This does NOT imply consent. God damn it people are stupid.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:09 PM
0

I'm 25 just can't get into twitter lol I prefer instagram
/r/MensRights03/01/14 02:31 AM
0

Apologies then, I rarely use twitter.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 07:54 PM
16

And "do" to "does".
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:23 PM
8

Most people are capable of anything. War will make anyone of any gender of any sexuality of any age (etc etc) do terrible things. Am I excusing the action? Absolutely fucking not. Fuck that guy. However I am just saying being a man has little to do with it.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 07:02 PM
7

They are just mad she said no to feminism (the label). She could have said anything (besides humanism) and they would have said the same bullshit. I like Dessa too. Her music is very pro gender equality these feminists reveal their true intent when all they care about is labels.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:11 AM
1

You aren't making sense. I never said it is okay to molest a child. I said molesting a child does not mean you are attracted to them. Attraction is the characteristic that makes someone a pedophile, not the action. Guys fuck each other in jail sometimes, however that doesn't mean they are gay. It's situational. Then you start going on to whether it is okay to be attracted to prepubescent children or not. That is not the argument here so why the hell are you bringing it up? Take a chill pill.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:47 PM
1

You're completely right, feminists can bug out all they want.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:02 AM
9

It requires the attraction. Many child molesters did so for power reasons or were drunk or situational. The diagnosis requires the attraction. I could rape a man but that won't make me homosexual.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:55 AM
15

I like when people just try to make up there own definitions of already defined terms. Pedophile: someone (teenager or older) who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children (girl boy or both) for a period longer than six months. That's it. You can molest a child but not be a pedophile. You can never touch a child and be a pedophile. You can find one random preteen child attractive and that feeling never comes again and you are not a pedophile. You can be attracted to adults but still be a pe…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:59 PM
28

Yeah, it is one of those politically correct "It's their culture and they choose to do it!" nonsense. While there is pressure on both men and women to behave in certain ways in America it is NOT acceptable to beat, punish, jail, or kill them for not following such pressure.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:52 AM
2

Don't worry, feminists come in with the opposite. That any guy they deem "too old" interested in a female "too young" is a perverted creep and abusive regardless of his or her feelings or intentions. Both vies are idiotic. Look at the individual relationship and how each party feels and treats each other. Blanket assumptions are for the ignorant.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:16 PM
23

Women can get wet and orgasm while being raped... I guess that's a form of consent as well?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:07 PM
0

Funny at all the downvotes you got, because you are absolutely right. One problem with our society, obsession with degrees.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 08:10 AM
-1

I mean, nudity is no big deal. If she made the kid look that's wrong, but not the end of the world (even if a guy did it to a girl). It's the human body. I don't like the double standard but that's it.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 04:29 AM
3

I have an infant cousin. She is like 5 or 6 months. Infants cry when alone. This is instinctual, normal. Quiet babies died back in the day when we had to worry about wild animal predators. So my cousin is crying her eyes out. Her aunts and uncles (charged with watching her) insist picking her up will "spoil" her. I decided to go and pick her up and hold/play until she fell asleep. Ending the hour long crying session in ten minutes. The women sat there telling me they hope I get a good wife who k…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 04:20 AM
1

Cosmetics are almost never a reason to permanently alter the body of a child when they can't even voice their opinion. Especially circumcision. One of the most pointless cosmetic surgeries there is. Hell I don't even agree with piercing the ears of an infant, let alone permanently cutting off skin from their penis.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 08:25 AM
66

If a woman is physically capable I don't see why not but I am vehemently opposed to lowering the bar just to let someone in. That could easily put the mission and the unit in mortal danger.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 10:59 PM
7

Of course she should. Unless he was a rapist.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:51 AM
4

Exactly. Why would I have left the house with my shitty bachelor's degree (masters and phds are becoming more and more necessary) at 22 and struggled paying for an apartment. A shitty one at that. Makes no sense to me. I'll be out in a few years able to get my own house with a nice job gotten because of my phd. Much more secure.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:50 PM
9

Yeah, all the girls I went to middle school with married some guy who makes money. Meanwhile I prefer to take the smart way and save money and secure a good job before I move out. I can also help my parents out as well with money and the business. Works all the way around.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 07:24 PM
9

It's fucking insane. I am very open minded when it comes to sex, but rape is rape. Not the feminists definition of rape, but this is rape. Resisting! Physically resisting! They still don't call it rape, fucking crazy. Men don't just get erections from consensual experiences. Stimulation of the penis can do it, especially a guy who had no sexual experience.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:58 AM
15

Open and closed case of rape. He resisted, didn't want it, voiced his opposition, never said yes at all, then was threatened? How dare they acquit her. Crazy. If it was a guy and even if the girl consented he'd be going to jail and she'd be going to therapy. What's with this crazy double standard?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:25 AM
5

I hate the hypocrisy. I don't get this feminist hatred of people admiring the people they are attracted to. Who cares? Just don't judge people based on it. Simple as that. I might think a girl is hot or not, but I won't treat her differently. I hate how feminists fight for men to not view women sexually unless the women somehow consents to it, but women can do it to men it's okay and fine. I hate how people think there is a problem with this to begin with. The only problem is reducing men or wom…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:04 PM
46

Also about 25 and every teacher I had in elementary and middle school said girls were better behaved and got better grades and the boys need to be like them because the boys misbehaved too much. What I always saw was the girls were more obedient to an undeserving authority and the boys saw through the bullshit and gave the teacher little to no respect. Any good teacher I had was respected by both... though girls would say he/she was "not hard enough on the students, especially boys"
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:46 PM
2

I prefer marriage stop being a state issue and remain personal. The state should have never been involved in marriage in the first place.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:20 AM
1

Exactly, I feel if society would calm the fuck down and rationally handle these situations most people wouldn't be waking up with panic attacks as an adult and be better equipped to handle any cases of real abuse.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:44 PM
1

My view and subsequent research came from a personal experience as well. I had a sexual experience with my aunt as a preteen. No one found out and I just went on with life, never bothered. Even when I'd hear all the anti-molestation information I assumed it didn't mean me because she never forced, threatened, or tried to scare me. Now I have people in /r/mensrights telling me I am lying and a SRS plant. People in SRS say I am a pedophile who is making up a story or I compartmentalized the abuse …
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:26 PM
1

Depends on the length of the abuse. A one time thing can be traumatic and damaging but kids are resilient and as long as people don't treat them like damaged goods (like they currently do) they can recover relatively well with love and support. Long time abuse, like a daily or weekly basis for months and years, that is very damaging for kids and adults. Still possible to recover from with the above criteria, just takes more effort. It's like, say you get jumped by a bunch of people and the shit …
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:02 AM
8

The whole "you can't rape a male if you are a female and you have intercourse because penetration ddeeerrrr" is bullshit. Their point about the boy liking it could be legitimate if found to be true. Many people create victims when it comes to sexual situations simply because they do not like the sexual situation. Maybe he did like it, his gender has nothing to do with it though. Maybe we should ask him. Not make assumptions.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:56 AM
7

Failing to prove guilt does not mean it was a false accusation. However if there is evidence that it was false then that is a different story. No one suggests punishing a woman if the prosecution failed to prove guilt, feminists like to twist it that way. We are saying if the prosecution failed to prove guilt and evidence is found that the woman lied then she should be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:48 PM
2

At least they took both the men and women calenders. So it wasn't sexism, just anti-sexual utter stupidity! Typical of modern feminists!
/r/MensRights18/12/13 06:00 PM
17

This is what happens when you mystify sex, make consent some huge cloud of smog to wade through, and treat people who were wronged or made a mistake as if their life is over. Maybe you didn't really want to fuck that guy when you were drunk, you just went along because of the heat of the moment? STDs? Babies? No? Get over it, we all make mistakes, especially when drunk. If you literally were unable to resist because of how drunk you were file a complaint TO THE POLICE.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:28 PM
-2

Chester the Molester is frequently accused.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:34 PM
2

Resources for what exactly?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:31 AM
12

Exactly, people should never underestimate the power of a very determined group, even if only made up of a small amount of people. Look at how most civil rights movements start? Granted those were positive, there are negatives as well. Like fringe feminists.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 08:55 PM
1

That's exactly for the reason I stated. Notice though that no one is forcing men to go there. I, personally, avoid clubs that make such a huge difference for male and females. However I understand why they do it.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 04:35 PM
1

Not really a good analogy. Both male and females want male and females in the club. However, the general trend is that more males tend to go and out number females. Which is bad for a club.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 04:34 PM
2

It is a club? I honestly understand. They don't want it to be only guys, because then those guys won't go back. Then they lose money and possibly the business.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 05:36 AM
3

First off she is insulting the women providing this service. Sexist against females. Then she is insulting the men who just want to snuggled. Sexist against men. As a gun-toting, weight lifting, basketball playing guy I love cuddles. It does feel good and there is scientific reasoning for it. These people are just sexist pricks that don't know anything.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 09:37 PM
4

History Channel Aliens Guy "Feminism"
/r/MensRights14/12/13 05:56 PM
3

Why are feminists trying to play a "we are abused worse!" game? Oh because they have made a profession out of being a victim, thus insulting actual victims.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 06:29 AM
1

You have terrible reading comprehension skills if that is what you took out of what I said. You're paranoid. Look at my dang comment history.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 02:16 AM
5

There is no "rape culture" in the sense that feminists want us to believe... except maybe that they advocate a culture where everything is rape.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 09:33 PM
1

Another person proving my point. Thanks, oh and it wasn't a man, it was a women, NAMBLA is for men and boys. Oh someone played with my penis when I was a kid and because I am not horribly traumatized I must be a plant or troll and especially a liar. Nothing like having people invalidate your experiences because the conclusion you come to is not what they want to hear. Thanks. Good to see men's rights is just as idiotic in this regard as feminism.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 05:23 PM
1

My point exactly, thanks for proving it. How dare I not fit what you guys believe I should be feeling. Damn me eh?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 05:22 PM
1

I was a victim of what a therapist would call sexual abuse at seven. However I enjoyed it and was not harmed. No one seems to care about the most important thing... did the younger party consent? Of their free will? Not under duress. If so then separate them from the adult. Reprimand the adult, tell the child that is something you wait to do until you are older... the end. If it was rape/sexual abuse then it needs to be taken more seriously. However not hysterically. Hysterical reactions that ar…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:32 AM
0

That type of attitude is what is making the son cry in court and the mother crying "Justice for my son!!!!" Taking something that should not damage someone for their life and turning it into something that eats at them their whole life. Then when someone like me says that people say "HOW DARE YOU!? Were you molested or raped!? It is the worst experience ever!!!" and I say... "well yes I was molested in the legal sense of the term, but it did not harm me because I liked it" Then they claim I am l…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:30 AM
3

Imagine if there was a "Keep your women in her place" kit? Both would be terrible. This is terrible. Not even funny or cute.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:23 AM
4

How can you sexualize a sexual being? I am insanely curious as to how that works. Up until 120 years ago people were always fucking of all ages. Especially teens and up. Also why is this a bad thing if everyone consented and practiced safe sex? Why? No punishments for anyone, make sure they were practicing safe sex. Then who cares.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:21 AM
2

Albanian women have been doing this for a long time, look up "Sworn Virgins" lol but seriously very interesting piece, cool lady and awesome that it aired.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:02 PM
1

Consent is on the back burner for feminists. They say consent is the most important, however only they can determine what "true" consent is. Someone consents, but doesn't meet their criteria of a person who is allowed to consent or the situation doesn't meet their criteria of a consentable one and they literally work hard to convince the person they were raped and that the male was a rapist. Remember it is always the male who was the rapist. Feminists don't care about consent, only the control o…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:46 AM
10

I feel that modern feminism is about controlling sex and sexuality so that women can draw lines wherever they want and men have to constantly... constantly watch where they are stepping. Women can protest nude, if a man reveals his penis he is sexually assaulting someone. Women can flaunt their breasts or ass, but god forbid if a man comments on them (even if a positive comment). I am a very sex positive guy. So I feel men shouldn't be shaming girls for having recreational sex (as long as they a…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:06 AM
1

My cousin is 6'8 in decent shape and not an ugly guy. He is also misogynist (I've helped change him for the better but still... any girl who has sex outside of marriage is a whore to him, dirty). The women still love him. We walk into a club, guess who gets all the attention. Even with his attitude after they start talking to him, still love him and that height. No I am not jealous. I just have to work a little harder than him at 5'10 175 athletic build at a club. I like a little challenge, make…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter