TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MobileVulgusaurusSex Archive

View 1 post and 37 comments by MobileVulgusaurusSex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

ResourcesMobileVulgusaurusSex/r/seduction04/08/20 10:59 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

However, specifically in the first episodes it's detailed that he hadn't had any women up to that point and was supremely awkward around them and always pictured his own mother, whom he thought to have been a whore. Sounds like an incel.
/r/seduction03/10/20 04:59 PM
1

He is the only male character that slept with only one girl and was dedicated to her, his fucking sister.
/r/seduction03/10/20 04:57 PM
30

He ended the movie running castle black. He was king of the sexless. He literally did not end the movie as the king. That’s kinda the whole end of the show. He starts as an Incel and gets laid by two objectively insane women and that’s his whole sex life. The only less PUA guy on the show is Jaime. I mean the imp and Podrick are more logical role models in the context of this show and this subreddit technically. The folly of his character should not be lost on this sub.
/r/seduction03/10/20 08:40 AM
60

Exactly, first like 6 seasons, total simpaholic.
/r/seduction03/10/20 05:12 AM
19

I think if we pull back to statements he made later and even only shortly ago, men tend to start as the first type and evolve into the second type. It's less of being one than the other and more so, one evolves into the other.
/r/seduction01/09/20 09:05 PM
3

Flirt with people you don’t want. Flirt with old women, service workers etc. Use flirtatious techniques in non-flirtatious environments; flirting is just being playful, light and fun; so flirt in interviews, with friends, with literally everyone. Stop thinking of game as a thing you turn on and off for a prospective mate. Game is just socializing well. I learned this in retail sales. For sex, talk about sex you don’t have/ don’t want to have. Talk about sex with a gay friend or a lesbian you kno…
/r/seduction29/08/20 09:23 PM
1

My point is simply there is, a lexicon, of words, but also, behaviors and acts, that define pua and or any like term you want to attach to it. As a matter of fact, the two lost recent mentions of negging I heard from women in public were not pua related, they actually were women charging the man with a more incel type identity. Point here being that certain things get overused to the point that they become associated with negative traits. And the act of negging in a more nuanced fashion works an…
/r/seduction04/08/20 09:27 PM
1

Exactly my point. Not exactly panty drenching verbiage.
/r/seduction04/08/20 12:08 PM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:46 AM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:45 AM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:45 AM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:45 AM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:45 AM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:45 AM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:44 AM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:44 AM
1

I added it as it's own comment
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:44 AM
17

"My List". So, Infinite Jest is amazing, it's a thousand pages though, and it's not going to do a lot for you in the seduction racket. The Stranger by Camus, philosophy is kinda my bag, but I am certain that throwing out most exi's quotes in talking a girl up will not help me. I can't tell you the none times I've attempted to throw out some witty Moby Dick quote in the club. I prefer movies for my fiction and honestly don't think you have to "read the classics" to be a well rounded man these day…
/r/seduction04/08/20 10:43 AM
1

Good catch, that typo totally invalidates my points.
/r/seduction04/08/20 09:05 AM
1

I didn't say they were the same thing, but they live in the same political spectrum neighborhood for a reason. Anybody can become a king, just look at the kings there have been, and they weren't even rich enough to give 1/4 of their fortune away to their ex and still have enough money to privately fund a space program. If you have "go to the moon" money, you're too rich.
/r/seduction04/08/20 09:01 AM
1

Well technically it's motive isn't to get the target to "prove herself" it's technically to lower their perceived value in comparison to your own within the exchange. But if you want a "coherent", I assume you mean common definition, just say the word in any mixed company of people old enough to have heard of VH1 or having been to a bar or nightclub more than once and you'll quickly get the definition you're now going to have to live by. Negging, it's kinda like a swastika, maybe THAT isn't what…
/r/seduction04/08/20 08:56 AM
2

I rarely respect Mark or his opinions, I just don’t like my cult like self help to be pseudo-mystical cult like self help. My main issue with The Secret personally is it’s abdication of personal responsibility, which is a common theme when religious elements are brought into a thing. I’m not a fan of books made of paper. Or paper at all.
/r/seduction04/08/20 03:10 AM
5

I don’t know if The Game “holds up” so much. Rick and Morty alone make a joke in the past season about “negging”. As a concept to be understood better, yeah it totally “works”. But say that word to anyone on earth in public, and you might as well be wearing a feather boa trying to perform street magic in a bar.
/r/seduction04/08/20 02:24 AM
1

So if you have the book twice, did you read it twice? It’s hilarious that you have 2 “The Secret” and 2 “Subtle Art of ...” when Mark Manson wrote an entire essay about how The Secret is bullshit. Bullshit of The Secret
/r/seduction04/08/20 02:15 AM
2

A lot of people are huge fans of Covey and I totally get that, I just didn't get any more out of that than I already heard from Tony Robbins. Honestly it probably comes down to which of these you might come across first, because there really is redundant simple truism stuff in these sources. For instance before any of these I had read some management books and the Getting Things Done guy, and while I read those things there first, I feel as though Robbins put them better, albeit that Robbins had…
/r/seduction03/08/20 10:55 AM
3

2 answers here. 1, I'm actually a huge fan of Tony Robbins and I'd recommend his stuff and it's for improving your life, not simply your love life. Your love life is only one spoke in the wheel that is your life. Not a pillar upon which it will all fall if that pillar is not strong enough, just a spoke that makes the wheel stronger. Answer 2, about the "just want a cute girlfriend" bit. You can and will hear a lot of responses to that though. One being from 40 Year Old Virgin the film, essential…
/r/seduction03/08/20 10:49 AM
2

I'll reply back tomorrow with a condensed purpose driven list.
/r/seduction03/08/20 10:38 AM
1

Actually it's a cute turn of phrase I saw in a meme that encapsulates my main criticism of libertarianism (aside from it being a cynical world view also). Feudalism simply creates a system whereby power balances never change by mechanism of the state apparatus. Libertarianism desires such a hands off, almost anarchical in many extreme cases, system that once a person amasses billions of gold coins and creates a private army, then, how is Bezos not then a monarch? What's actually stopping him if …
/r/seduction03/08/20 10:38 AM
10

Yeah I'll reply back to this comment tomorrow with my own condensed purpose driven list.
/r/seduction03/08/20 10:29 AM
3

It’s everyone’s job to be critical to an extent because you can’t go around believing everything you’re told. Please tell me something unique you’ve gotten from Tim Ferris that Robbins didn’t take 2 hours to explain with more actionable intelligence. And please list the unique financial advice provided from Rich Dad Poor Dad that wasn’t already in Teach You To Be Rich. I’m asking you to make specific examples and sight sources. If you’re going to champion this list then please validate the inclu…
/r/seduction03/08/20 07:53 AM
65

Skip Mark Manson's Subtle Art..etc. It's a cheap clickbait of a book directed at precisely the kind of guy that would read a book with the title Subtle Art...etc. So if that title appeals to you, avoid it because you're being sold. His earlier book, Models is far better in the game genre as it was written before he was trying to pivot his brand to become a bro-centric Tony Robbins. Jordan Peterson's book is basically book 1 in my opinion for a reader interested in a reading list of this type. Al…
/r/seduction02/08/20 11:17 PM
1

Which is exactly what I said in the comment that you responded to with "ihadastroke", so there ya go.
/r/seduction26/07/20 11:40 PM
1

Oh no, I was implying that the person presenting a "mirror" of my statement, the person implying that the less women are approached, the less creep out moments they will incur, THAT would lead to the end of the species because if men didn't approach women, the species would die. However to your overall point, I think the "balance of power" as it were in the different areas of life; men make more money than women, women are the gatekeepers of the dating scene (ie "girls night" exists to get more …
/r/seduction24/07/20 10:13 AM
5

You're falling into the trap laid out by Hume, Is vs Ought. The world "ought" to be men and women approaching eachother equally. But the world "is" currently and in the past has been men approaching women. Is that changing into a more equal shared work, yes, but slower than many would have you believe. So actually, by proposing the mirror of my phrase, you'll have doomed the species since nobody will be getting impregnated if men decreased approaches to the point of no women ever experiencing be…
/r/seduction24/07/20 09:13 AM
1

You are "strawmaning" (r/ihadastroke). The guy was simply pointing out that on a certain level, approaching is a numbers game. And the more approaches that are made, the rate of incidence of "girl creeped out by guy", will increase. The sentence about "they are not getting sex" was worthless to the point being made though.
/r/seduction24/07/20 08:46 AM
-1

I tried to edit it for clarity but at a certain point I'm no longer responsible for your inability to keep up.
/r/seduction24/07/20 08:41 AM
39

So to paraphrase: "Don't do this, but sometimes it's ok to do this, and it's gone well sometimes. But, don't do this, and almost always not at night, or half the time. And not just guys doing this to girls, but also I'm obviously talking about guys doing this to girls, I just don't wanna sound like I am, get it?" Maybe instead of environment, you mean context. And that would mean that absolutes and generalizations are worthless here. It's terrible for a person (a woman) to have a bad experience …
/r/seduction24/07/20 08:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter