TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ModerSvea Archive

View 1 posts and 168 comments by ModerSvea on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
527

ModerSvea/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:14 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Nail on the head there.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:25 PM
-1

Um, you can lie over the phone. And I'm sure he called, the point is she could withhold info because he couldn't physically see for himself what was going on.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:08 PM
4

He was in the army, stationed elsewhere, he couldn't physically come home to see for himself so his wife just never told him. Not his fault.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:59 AM
20

They already have 4 kids of their own, so that's not part if the issue, they say it's God's will for them to have a herd of children. They're very selfish.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:55 AM
1

I have never seen a feminist protest or movement here, because honestly there is nothing for them to complain about, nor have I even met a feminist, even in college. I also have no clue what "plays" you're talking about directed at kids, are you sure you aren't thinking if somewhere else?
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:24 PM
7

As a Swede I'm wondering where in the hell you're getting this information. Liberal yes, but the genders are treated way more equal and accountable here than America from what I've read.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:34 AM
5

Not true: If she slaps first, the law will protect he man for slapping back. She'll get what she deserves if she acts like an uncivilized nutjob.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:30 AM
1

Thanks for twisting my words with that last sentence. I apparently misunderstood what you meant by "medical", no need to be condescending.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 06:32 PM
1

But birth, no matter where is happens, is still a medical situation. Regardless, my original point was just to call you out on how stupid it was to claim that having an abortion isn't medical. It was just a really stupid claim with zero truth behind it.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:21 PM
1

it can be It cant be anything else! Abortion is medical any way you look at it, it is a procedure done by a doctor in a clinic, so is pregnancy and birth, you can't get around that fact.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 12:53 PM
0

So apparently an abortion isn't considered medical to you?
/r/MensRights04/01/13 10:23 PM
1

Just because sexism goes both ways doesn't mean it's not sexism. I never said it wasn't sexism, that's not what I'm arguing. I'm just saying that if a a person is happy in their current relationship no matter what the circumstances it's no one else's business. But on a side note, I do agree with what you say, it's just not what I was trying to say, does that makes sense?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:53 PM
3

What pisses me off is when feminists deny that hypergamy exists when it is so obviously patent everywhere Well in that case I couldn't agree more, it definitely exists all around the world, to deny that is just incredibly stupid/ignorant on their part.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:50 PM
15

Yeah and on the flip side, these older men covet having a younger woman because she makes him feel young, better sex life, hotter than women their own age... Being used goes both ways, the men DO have a choice you know, they wouldn't be in the relationship if they were unhappy about it. Both parties give and take. And if it works for them, what business is it of yours?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:26 PM
1

She is definitely a disgusting person, no argument there.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 09:15 PM
2

Just like how saying you're smoking pot on Facebook won't put you in jail, it's not a legally recongnized confession, merely evidence if he wishes to prosecute her.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:06 PM
6

5 separate counts of second degree statutory rape. This woman should be in jail for 10-20 year depending on the state. FTFY http://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/olrdata/jud/rpt/2003-r-0376.htm Not saying she isn't a horrible person, she is. But men don't spend life in prison for consensual statutory rape and neither should she. Life sentences should be for people who take lives, not virginity.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:03 PM
2

A) I was never "vivid" B) Men are naturally more AGGRESSIVE, not necessarily violent, but most violent crimes are committed by men, you can't deny that. Not needing this specific woman's help who clearly views men as destructive and violent and can't muster up a single positive attribute to describe them. If some guy went over to r/feminism and told them "look, you stupid emotional women need my help, you can't understand math or lift heavy things so just be grateful you have this man's support"…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:26 PM
2

No, I said historically that was their role (correcting YOUR very WRONG historical statement), not that it was now, hence the "viking age" comment to imply it was no longer valid. And NEVER did I say that men's only discerning trait is to be destructive, you sound like an SRSer ffs, warping words. If you want to be offended over nothing, go right ahead, not my problem. As for MR not needing a woman's help, every person counts whether you believe it or not.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:08 PM
2

I was merely correcting your statement. MRA has gotten a lot more hostile lately. I'm not stereotyping anything, you were mistaken and I corrected you. Just take it at face value, no need to get defensive.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:31 PM
0

I obviously haven't made myself clear, you've muddled and fucked up every single thing I've said. You're denser than a brick. I commended and thanked men for taking the more dangerous jobs and I meant it, but of course you looked over that and decided to warp my words in every way possible so you can act like a holier-than-thou twat. I've been an MRA for over 10 years to fight for the rights of men like my husband, especially when women take their kids away in hopes that my children won't have t…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:46 PM
0

but this doesn't count because women. I never said anything didn't count, I was comparing the 2 sexes WHICH IS THE POINT OF THE ENTIRE CONVO, PAY ATTENTION! So men can be naturally worse in some way (violent) but if anyone dares suggest they're naturally better (more self sacrificing) you'll rush in to argue. The fact than men commit 99% of violent crimes is a FACT. Your random assumption that a woman wouldn't give her life for someone else is an opinion. Learn the difference. At least I'm not j…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:23 PM
1

Men are more likely to commit a crime in any country, especially violent ones. What does that have to do with their feeling of self-worth? Yes men successfully kill themselves more than women, but there is also the factor of men use things that rarely fail like guns, hanging themselves, jumping in front of trains, etc. Women use pills, poisons, or cutting (and if it fails, as it often does because you loose consciousness long before dying, they are usually institutionalized and treated whereas t…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 04:26 PM
1

I don't know where you're from, but men are not taught that their lives are worthless here (Europe). I think this is personal for you, you sound embittered.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 04:08 PM
1

Actually that is not men's original genetic role at all. The men left the women and children behind to go hunt, often for days on end. It was up to the women to protect the home and the children, even up beyond the viking ages. Men are genetically providers, women are the protectors.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 04:07 PM
2

Actually you're the one that made the original claim, the burden of your sexist notions are on you. But you have to take into account that men are more likely to be in jobs with heavy burdens, (again, firefighters) and that's great and I thank them for it. But just because men can do the job easier doesn't mean women are cowards when they need to step up and save a life. It's a human thing, not a gender thing.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:50 PM
0

That's not for lack of them wanting to help, to be a firefighter is a predominately male profession due to them having to be able to lift a LOT dead weight. You're acting like women shy away from it like cowards which is certainly not true. Female lifeguards? Female police officers? Etc. You're just being sexist, period.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:27 PM
1

Only time will tell.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:09 PM
-1

That seems completely unnecessary. You know what your relationship has been like to this point? That's what marriage is like too. It won't change just because you exchange rings, life will continue unaltered, only she'll get a different last name, and you and half of your assets be legally bound to her. I've never seen the point in marriage.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 09:58 PM
4

You're in counseling before you're even married... I would wait honestly. This does not bode well for you.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 09:39 PM
1

It's what women thrive on, yet another reason I hate my gender. Gossip gossip gossip! Ugh. Talk about something relevant ffs, please! So frustrating.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:31 PM
2

I agree, and vice versa. Whomever invites the other should pay, it's how I've always done it and it make sense. If I invite him to come with me to something I want to do, why should he pay?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:14 AM
1

You're entitled up your opinions I guess. But as it was my original comment, I say you've missed my point quite obviously and derailed it to your own. Derail all you want, but I have better things to do than continue a pointless and fruitless tangent with you.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:31 PM
27

Your username is ironically relevant.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:56 AM
2

You're making a fuss about gender, where there is none (about the urinals comment). This kid is unique and has been shaving since 9, I'd say most of the other 13 year old's (girls AND boys) can't grow any facial hair yet, at best peachfuzz. This article was just about the ability for the fundraiser to include all the kids (again not just girls), hence why they came up with a rather good solution, give money and you get to wear a fake mustache. So while the kid's original intentions were awesome …
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:59 PM
3

OP, you're an ass for making a completely false title. This article had nothing to do with girls vs. boys at any point. Stop contributing to the problem.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:36 PM
3

Actually read the article please.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:34 PM
1

And I'm saying it is relevant But it's not and I don't care if you think it is. I'm not talking about the multiple consequences of what could come of what I said (that could go on forever and that's pointless), I'm only talking about what I said PERIOD. It's pretty black and white. You're taking this to levels it was never intended to go. And once again, let it go.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:24 PM
1

I'm saying it's irrelevant that you're tying it to my point, it was not my intention which I've made clear and you're making it sound like it was, and it wasn't. I don't care if you see them as related, it is still irrelevant to my point, which is what we're debating, therefore relevant to me. What is irrelevant however, is your BS correlation to skew my words. Let it go.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:46 PM
1

Listen to me or reread the thread. I was talking about things other than cost. You know, another aspect of the conversation. It was NOT the original point of MY discussion and if you think that, you need reading glasses. If you point out where I said "cost" specifically doesn't matter, then I'll own it. But once-a-fucking-gain. I. Never. Said. It. Move on.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 11:52 AM
1

exasperated beyond belief Once-a-fucking-gain, I never said anything about the COST. It was NOT my original point and I never was debating COST into the equation of my opinion. Stop arguing shit that was never in my conversation to begin with. I've never met someone that it was so hard to explain what we're NOT having a conversation about.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:47 PM
1

I said "so what" is response to a woman working one less year, not the cost. Read it again, this is really obvious.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:12 AM
1

A flat percentage. As far as I know there are only 2 groups, 90% of us fit into the first group and we all pay the same %. Then there is a group that pays a little more because they make a lot more, I think it'd be like 200,000USD.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:10 AM
1

Like I've said repeatedly, the cost was never what I was debating and I've made that pretty clear. I'm not indifferent, it just wasn't my point.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 08:48 PM
1

No, not really. Everyone pays the same. Plus it's none of Reddit's business.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 08:21 PM
1

And where in that comment did I say it didn't cost anything? I didn't.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 08:18 PM
1

Well in my country, the industry doesn't have to pay the difference, nat'l insurance does, so women are able to be hired and not discriminated against because they might hurt profits by being mothers. Also men and women take equal time off, so it's no longer a gender issue. I wish the rest of the world worked this way.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:25 AM
1

But it's not my point, so I don't know why you keep bringing it up.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:22 AM
1

I never wrote it.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:22 AM
1

What to do about it is neither something I can personally speculate nor can pretend to know what to do. I actually agree that women kind of fucked up the workforce forever, it's sad, but true. And I agree it makes us less happy because we can't have an amazing career or an be an amazing mom, we have to be mediocre at both because we have to juggle them. I can own that, because it's true. I'll give it a look-see, even if it is depressing. Thanks!
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:53 PM
-4

So women shouldn't be doctors then? But it wasn't the point I was making, I've stated this repeatedly.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:48 PM
-2

Why else would women wait until their bodies are "too old" to have children? Here a lot of women put of children for JUST that reason, a career. Having them around 35-40. That's not an assumption, it's a real observation. Of course work is important, you need 2 incomes to raise a family properly and happily. I don't see why this is even debatable. Women must sacrifice time with their family so they can help provide for them, it's a fact of life in the 21st century, no one can afford to be a stay…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:04 PM
-5

Why does it matter if a woman takes a year off for maternity leave? 1 less year of being a doctor, so what? Would you rather all women just stopped having babies and then humanity just stagnated? People are born to breed, it's what we do, it's natural. The fathers often want children too, but his career isn't a risk, it's only the woman's. A lot of women don't want to ruin their careers and more women are having children older and older (at least here) because of that, which is dangerous in some…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 06:27 PM
-1

70%??? What? I pay 30% in income tax, the rest in mine to spend. Unless you're also including sales tax, but that's another beast entirely. Once again, I've stated this repeatedly, I NEVER SAID IT DIDN'T COST ANYTHING. Where are you people getting this? All I said that that the HR's insufficient planning was also to blame, that is IT. Stop taking this into a debate I never started. Edit: That Local link is crap, I have paystubs that prove how much is taken from my check and it is NOT 70%.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 06:20 PM
-3

When did I ever say that it didn't cost anything? I'm not denying it, nor did I ever imply that. No idea where you're getting this. That was never my point. Regardless, dads should get equal time off, I've never known anything different actually, it's the law in Sweden that both parents HAVE to take leave. It's rather nice actually and the dads deserve it just as much as we do.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 06:09 PM
-6

I think it's mostly bad planning honestly. Give one a set half-time schedule, then schedule another half-timer to compliment the other schedule, repeat as needed. You get 1 whole shift (or maybe a little more) out of 2 people. Businesses do this all the time, but for some reason when the person is a half-time mother it matters? That doesn't make sense. It's not that hard to schedule people and plan ahead, it's HR's job to accommodate them according to the law and what works best for the company …
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:52 PM
-6

But that's not what I'm saying (although your points are good, just not what I'm getting at). The posts in this thread are blaming women for this problem. That is not where the annoyance should be pointed. The HR staff made crappy decisions and didn't cover their arses sufficiently regardless of law, but everyone here just jumped on the "women suck" bandwagon without thinking about it first. I don't know how it works completely in the UK, but here in Sweden when a woman goes on maternity leave, …
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:47 PM
-11

Just a thought: Women don't just get pregnant than instantly give birth, the employers have 7-8 months of warning that these employees will go on leave and if these employers were competent in their positions they would plan for this fact. So to make it sound like it's all the women's fault is just flat out crap.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:08 PM
1

You're ignoring a very important reality: There are such things as sperm banks for just this problem. You don't need another person to have a baby. She would still be exercising her right to have a child and not hurting anyone in the process.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:04 PM
1

Also posted in /r/feminism and it was ignored. Heaven forbid the truth be found out and they have one less thing to be pissed about. I swear they WANT to be oppressed and pissed all the time.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:14 AM
1

I agree that a man should be able to sign over his rights to a child before it's born (just like a woman can with an abortion) and therefore wave any monetary responsibility to it, however if a man doesn't wave his rights and tries to raise the child, but realizes 6 months down the line that it's "too hard" (not saying a lot of men do this, but I know men that have) then NO, keep supporting the child you said you would support. It's not fair to promise the mother support and then pull out the ru…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:22 PM
7

We're just going to have to agree to disagree, I feel that since he was assaulted first, his actions were justified. Had she not come back at him, I might see your point, but she was obviously out for blood (starting the fight and THEN prolonging it) and I'm glad he subdued her. I would've done the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:40 PM
9

Seriously? He was just assaulted by a crazy woman and you think words would have worked with her?? And after he tried to toss her off, SHE CAME BACK AT HIM! Obviously words would not work with a crazy person like her. Be realistic.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:08 PM
9

I see from the video (I didn't see the link before) that she hit him and he immediately got up and hit her. That is justified. People are saying there was a pause and that he was just being vengeful. I don't see that. He was hit by her, took time to unbuckle his seatbelt, then immediately hit her like anyone else would in an assault. I still feel that she deserved it. Edit: But I will concede that he went a little too far by choking her after she came at him again, he should have just hit her ag…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:54 PM
1

I'm in Sweden and I signed.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:42 PM
20

The point is that when SHE hit HIM, the bus was NOT stopped, meaning she was putting people's lives at risk by attacking someone who is driving. I would bet money that she kept cussing and berating him until the buss was stopped, he hit her, then kicked her out. I think she deserved 100% of what she got for risking innocent people. And yes, if we do switch the genders, the woman's use of physical force against a male aggressor wouldn't even be questioned and she would be applauded for what she d…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:38 PM
4

Signed, this is horrible that this is allowed to happen to a person protecting himself from an aggressor. He acted 100% rightly.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:33 PM
1

Glad to see another woman understands what I saw, glad to hear from you!
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:00 PM
2

And this is appreciated whole-heartedly!
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:57 PM
1

I'll go check them out, thank you both.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:51 PM
1

Heaven forbid! /s It's just ridiculous...
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:42 PM
1

From what I've seen, I very much agree with what you've said, thank you for sharing!
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:41 PM
2

It was a good tangent, and you make a good point. Whatever you are, Sir Fappington, your name is awesome. :D
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:39 PM
1

Understandable. It shouldn't be based on hate. I don't stay angry long, I'm pretty much over it 24 hours later, I just don't want to be near it any more. :)
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:37 PM
2

If you don't give a shit, why bother replying?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:36 PM
2

I never really identified as a feminist per se, I was just dipping my toes in the water to see if it could benefit me, so far I've gotten nothing positive from it, so I think I'll back away slowly and move on. It just seems a bit backwards and monotonous. Going around in circles and repeating the same things hoping to get new results... It's crazy.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:33 PM
1

Thank you, I'll add it to my subs :)
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:30 PM
1

Haha, well thank you :)
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:29 PM
2

Agreed. Life is hard and you shouldn't be able to get out of things just by quivering a lip, producing a tear, or lowering your neckline.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:27 PM
1

That made me facepalm. It's this shit fems, seriously! O_O
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:07 PM
0

You are the only one that has tried to start a debate. I was merely ranting my personal feelings. I'm not looking for a debate with you. And some things in MR are in debate fashion, there is also a lot of 'I have this problem...' and they get advice or other people sharing similar stories. My rant is in the latter category, please perceive it as such.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:37 PM
4

Oh if only I could upvote this more than once, this was my 'hearty chuckle' of the evening! Thank you!
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:25 PM
0

We. Aren't. Debating. This was a personal rant. Why on earth did you think this was a black and white debate? Edit: And I used that statement because it was the subject of my original rant. I think they have immature and irrational behavior, I compared the two. Did you even read my rant before posting here?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:24 PM
2

That is sad, but true. I take everything "serious" on reddit with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:23 PM
-1

I think you are reading way to much into my reply. And you're implying tones and I never intended, yet another problem with the internet. He had every right to downvote me, but I have the right to think he was wrong and rash to do so and didn't bother to take the time to ask WHY, I find that irritating and it reminds me of /r/feminism and how they handle things.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:04 PM
3

Well, it is Reddit after all, can't teach an old dog new tricks! ;)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:40 PM
3

"Maybe I'm just tired of society bending over backwards for women who do nothing but perpetuate stereotypes." I hadn't thought about this, but yes, this is a large part of what gets on my nerves so very much.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:15 PM
6

You've just given me the weirdest mental image... Super-vagina-vison... I... well... hmmm O_O Anyway, I know how you feel, I've often felt the wrath of the uterus.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:06 PM
9

I feel it has it's not-so-great moments, but I don't feel it's nearly as bad as /r/feminism and I hope it never gets that way.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:48 PM
2

THIS needs to be posted in /r/feminism! If it even gets 1 of them to look deeper it would be worth it.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:44 PM
7

Meh, at least others asked why I did that and I explained. If you want to be that way, fine.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:41 PM
2

Yes, there are times it gets bad. I understand if you're frustrated, but I have a fairly long fuse. :)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:40 PM
9

Well I think it has a lot of good articles and points made here. There are some serious trolls here, but they're easily ignored. :)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:15 PM
6

I see what you mean, I didn't mean it to come off that way, sorry if it did. Mythin's statement above is what I was trying to convey. Feminism should benefit me as a woman and therefore I should like/support it, but I have seen that it does not help, in fact I think it hurts my gender. Does that make sense?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:12 PM
6

I'm a little crazy, but I hope it's in a good way! Thank you Mythin :)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:00 PM
4

I've had a few trolls. I realize they are just bored people with nothing better to do, easily ignored. :)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:58 PM
1

Thank you :)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:53 PM
4

I don't think they can enjoy life, they're so busy commiserating and feeling oppressed because they want to feel special. It reminds me of teenagers.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:52 PM
3

I see your point, thank you :)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:50 PM
8

I will be using that in my next debate, well said
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:49 PM
7

Thank you!
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:48 PM
10

True. I feel that if they complain about the most minute of things like "to bitch" I don't see how they can expect to be taken seriously on heavier matters. It seems like they WANT to be offended, and I just don't have the energy to deal with people like that.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:09 PM
2

Thanks, glad to have some really good responses here, that's really what I needed. I feel kind of out of place at the moment. But I'll go check out that sub, thanks again!
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:07 PM
7

Ah yes, also a good point I had floating around in my head, but you said it better.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:57 PM
9

I noticed that today as well and thought the same thing, they cannot handle being wrong or any dissent whatsoever, so what do they do? Make it impossible! Democracy fail.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:56 PM
17

Ah you make a great point that both subs need to remember, that we are all separate individuals, we are all different, and we should all try to improve what we can. Thanks
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:51 PM
7

Just subscribed, great tip!
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:36 PM
24

I'm starting to see that.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:34 PM
105

I think because I feel that people (not /r/mensrights specifically, everyone) assumes that because I'm female, I'm automatically a feminist or supporter of their thought process. I guess I just wanted to make the distinction that women can be completely fed up with these feminists too. Does that make sense?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:33 PM
12

I can't imagine! They are so so so mean to any guys and I hate it. May I apologize of behalf of the crazy members of my gender, we aren't all mad.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:25 PM
99

I completely agree Pyehole. What is between my legs or your legs or anyone's legs doesn't matter one bit, everyone is discriminated against and no one deserves it.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:24 PM
1

Också: http://www.ibtimes.com/arizona-birth-control-bill-allows-employers-fire-women-pill-based-religious-beliefs-425530
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:52 PM
1

Graviditet är inte ett "handikapp", men det tillfälligt göra kvinnor inte kan göra vissa saker utan att risk för sig själva eller barnet. Jag tror arbetsgivaren kan göra några små förändringar för 9 månader, kommer det inte skada dem att se till att heden av sina anställda inte äventyras. Edit: Ska människor som bryter ett ben får sparken? De är tillfälligt inte kan göra alla sina jobb, men de kommer att kunna igen efter en viss tid. Men eftersom de inte kan göra absolut 100% av sitt arbete utan…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:59 AM
1

Jag kan inte tro detta fruktansvärda attityd det kommer från en svensk. Jag har inget mer att säga dig.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:33 PM
1

Jag håller inte med ditt tänkesätt mot kvinnor på arbetsplatsen. Kvinnor ska inte behöva ge upp en välförtjänt karriär att ha en familj (som en man, hennes man också vill vara han inte behöver offra arbetande rättigheter.) Jag kan inte se vad som är svårt att förstå här.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:59 PM
1

Så om en kvinna blir gravid, måste hon välja sitt arbete eller sitt barn? Hur är det rättvist? Edit: Och jag refererar till Amerika, inte Sverige.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:56 PM
0

I agree, I just think it's sad that there are so many overtly hateful comments in this thread, it sounds similar to SRS. :(
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:37 PM
1

Läs den här (bara 1 exempel): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/25/workplace-pregnancy-bill-opposition_n_1914062.html
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:23 PM
5

Trust. For me personally, sharing everything in a relationship is what makes it work, you start hiding money, you start hiding other things. It's unhealthy. The marriage in this story is very abnormal to me.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:10 PM
1

This story is hyperbole and everyone can see that. This particular story is a non-issue and the poster made something out of nothing, so I simply made an off-hand comment on something I thought was complete sexist drivel (women shouldn't stop fighting for their productive rights in their country just because someone, somewhere has it worse off, what kind of fucked up logic is that?), I forgot Reddit thinks women can't have opinions on men's issues, let me go back to the kitchen now /s. There are…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:08 PM
-2

I'd love to, at least they're decent human beings, you misogynist twit. Ta!
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:57 PM
1

I feel as though if this were a man's blog, bitching about his wife, you all would have very different opinions on the matter. Like telling him to 'drop that bitch' or that she's a 'freeloader' living off of her man, etc This saddens me. Be BETTER than the feminists, not on their BS level. :(
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:56 PM
-1

You need a cookie. Calm the fuck down.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:48 PM
-2

I love how you presume a) that I'm white, b) that I'm a woman and c) that I live in the USA. I'm a half-white woman living in Sweden (so fail 2 out of 3) I have a few expat American friends who often complain on this subject and I feel for them as we have no issues with being punished for being female here. You're an assuming hypocrite. Save your breath, I have no interest in arguing with fools.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:44 PM
-2

Wow, not touching that ignorant remark with a 10 foot pole. Sheesh. :/
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:13 PM
-1

You're a fool. Get a life ffs.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:32 PM
-3

Thank you. Edit: Downvotes for saying thank you? Fuck you, Reddit.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 08:35 PM
5

Because it's a shady 'source' at best.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:40 PM
8

HYPERBOLE ALERT OP! Your title is wrong and misleading. The DNA was found to be inconclusive (probably not viable after being tested 2 years later), not definitively not his. Also, there is evidence that the second condom DOES have his DNA on it, meaning he still has some explaining to do (not saying he's guilty, I'm just saying he should follow due process). The first woman doesn't really have much to go on (she only alleged that Assange lied when he told her he was protected and can't really p…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:37 PM
1

I gave my sources and they were pretty sound imo.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:35 PM
1

I can feel my uterus all too well every month. Cramping anyone?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:34 PM
1

Great then, we can't trust any information anywhere so everything is pointless. Fantastic. We're just going to have to agree to disagree. We aren't going to understand each other and this is a waste of time. Let's all move on to something more productive.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:17 PM
1

Um, men don't even know what it feels like to have a uterus. I can't imagine they could go much farther than that. Just like I can't imagine what it's like to be kicked in the balls because I don't have them, you can't relate to something that doesn't even match your anatomy.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:16 PM
0

Apparently you don't understand statistics. 90% of domestic violence victims are women. (Bureau of Justice Statistics Crime Data Brief, Intimate Partner Violence, 1993-2001, February 2003) ^ So while men do get beat up by women, it is still a major minority, and the police will always arrest the most likely suspect in any circumstance, sadly according to the numbers, these are most often, men. And often the police remove one culprit to get the 2 away from one another, blame can be thrown in cour…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:49 PM
0

This shows me that you ignore the fact that women have any problems whatsoever and think that only men are oppressed. Believe whatever you want. I admitted both sexes have their battles that need to be overcome, but you won't admit that women still have to overcome society's views of them as passive and submissive. If you won't meet me halfway with common sense, then I'm done. We ALL have problems and we've ALL been wronged by the gov't! If you can't admit that, no one can help you.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:27 PM
1

Please, do show me where laws actively HARM men. Again I think you're insane and just need to accept that both sexes have things that need to be fought for.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:08 PM
1

Um no. Not playing your little game. Men have to fight for custody rights, divorce rights, circ rights, false rape, etc... but women also have to fight: for sexual rights, workplace equality, bc rights, abortion rights, equal pay rights, etc. We ALL are fighting for equal rights, it's not men against women or vice versa and stop making it that way. Your attitude is contributing to the problem. Edit: spelling
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:36 PM
1

I would say his feelings should be brought to the table, but in the end it's the woman's choice. Pregnancy is hard and dangerous and you're never the same afterward, if a woman doesn't think she can handle it, she shouldn't be forced to. I do feel it's possible and sad that a man would be hurt by the loss and he should be offered counseling to cope, but I don't think a woman should be forced into a potentially life-threatening condition if they aren't willing.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:22 PM
0

Well I'm not a part of that movement and men (as a group) being silenced will never happen, so don't worry too much about it.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:19 PM
1

I think you're insane.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:18 PM
-1

Well your comparison was bad and that's what you implied. Sometimes women's rights are abused and sometimes men's are. But to say women have it better is just untrue.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:18 PM
-2

So because men (currently) don't have rights (that they should have, I agree), women don't deserve them either or should have them revoked? That's a horrid mindset you have. For the record, I'm all for autonomy, I don't care what the parent's religion or society says, it's not ok to cut off the piece of your infant, it should be banned. But don't let one injustice make another.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:57 PM
-1

Now you're just acting naive on purpose. It's about Akin's (and other's) comments and you know it. It's just over-simplified.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:53 PM
-2

You're not telling me anything I don't know. But let me just say that personally, when a woman says she pro-life I don't cringe because she can imagine what it's like to have a baby (or perhaps she already has) and she believes that she is strong enough to endure an unwanted pregnancy. However if a man says he's pro-life, I do cringe. Simply for the fact that men don't know what it's like. I'm not trying to start a comment war, but I have a feeling that if a woman started passing circumcision la…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:52 PM
0

A. I'm not a feminist and I don't like that movement. Women are not better than men and I dislike women that think this. B. This is about rich white republicans telling women what they can and cannot do with their own bodies. They can have their opinions all they want (but keep it to themselves), but they have ZERO right to force their opinions on other people's lives. <- That is the whole point of this image.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:45 PM
16

Bingo. The article even said it was in reference to the Akin comments, OP context fail.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:51 AM
4

Why is everyone overreacting about this? Please explain how how vaginas are any of your business (unless it's your wife/gf/daughter/family member)? Men can't get pregnant, don't know what it feels like, don't know the emotional strain it causes and how dangerous and hard pregnancy really is... or any other female health issue for that matter. How about everyone just calm down and move on. I don't think your dick is any of MY business, so why is this an issue? I feel you're completely missing the…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:49 AM
0

This is my opinion also. Why is everyone getting pissed off about this? If a female legislator was trying to limit men's reproductive rights, I'd tell her to STFU because she doesn't have a dick and doesn't know what she's talking about. It goes both ways. Some men just overreact when they're told (rightly IMO) that they've overstepped their bounds. MY vagina (or anyone else's) is none of YOUR business unless I'm dating you or married to you and even then it's still MY vagina, not yours.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:43 AM
12

You're deluded. Don't generalize that all women are that way. Those of us who were raised to not be self-centered bitches don't act like that. And I've met very few real women that have ever even considered acting like what you've described. I think you're just bitter over something.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:21 PM
1

I'm sure in that 47.9 they are also including the sales tax in averages per person. We don't pay income tax here and the gov't get's it's money that way. Numbers without the reasons behind them are very misleading. Read more into it, I don't know 1 single person who has ever paid over 30% from their income in taxes here.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 04:21 PM
1

We just finished our taxes in May, I paid 6% (because I only work part-time, 20 hours a week) and I got a 3000kr return and my boyfriend paid 26% from working full-time at a great job and got a 600kr return. It's not as bad as a lot of non-europeans make it out to be. :)
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:59 PM
1

They should, I agree! "Parental rights" that includes everyone will get much more support...
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:29 PM
1

"You mean like when it is perfectly ok for a woman to express any sexual preference she desires, but men have to weigh their words on a golden scale, least they cause some woman to develop an eating disorder?" This comment has made me realize you're not someone I'd like to continue conversing with. This was so close-minded and over-generalized, it's hard to believe you're actually serious. Wow.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:27 PM
1

Your first response: "I have actually always wondered about the leave law of Sweden. Why is it that taxpayers are supposed to cover the parents' right to leave for child-rearing, while at the same time being told that sex and reproduction are not rights. It is like someone wants ruthless competition until the time of conception, after that it is supposed to be a five year plan." ^<sup>Here</sup> you are talking about Sweden, then brought up the lack of sex and reproduction rights, therefore impl…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:40 PM
1

I am a woman, so no I have never been a single man, but I am lucky to be friends with many. But I also don't read pseudo-feminist crap from Cosmo (and the like) giving me bullshit dating tips that undermines male intelligence. This isn't unique to Sweden at all. Just because this bollocks exists doesn't mean every woman believes that crap, only teens read those magazines and any adult woman that does should be avoided like the plague IMHO.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:57 PM
2

I don't know how much clearer I can be here. What experiences make you feel oppressed as a man in Sweden and makes you think that sex and reproduction is hindered here. Again, I've never felt this way and my sambo read this and doesn't see what you see either. All I'm asking for is WHY and for you to back up your claims. Not too difficult
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:06 PM
0

Ok, så där fick du den idén? Personliga erfarenheter kanske?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:53 PM
2

That's not the way men are treated here at all, have you ever even been here?? Those sentiments would not be tolerated.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:32 PM
1

Thank god it's probably not serious, but you never know of this crazy internet of ours! But it was still a pretty bad response :P
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:23 PM
1

I don't understand at all what you mean by sex and reproduction not being rights, I've never heard or felt anything along those lines. Families are number 1 and the people have voted that they agree. It's not like we're upset about it, we chose this and it works quite well actually.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:14 PM
3

Oh dear, don't get me started on that!
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:11 PM
1

But why isn't anyone trying to fix it? It's really quite unacceptable how people are treated there.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:11 PM
2

This is, undoubtedly, the dumbest comment I've seen in a long while. THINK BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR MOUTH
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:50 PM
9

1 correction, it's 480 WORK days that we get for parental leave for each child, if you work 5-day weeks, that's over 2 years off, not 13 months (as stated in the article). And you don't have to take it all at once. My brother-in-law just took 12 weeks of his parental leave off to spend with his 2 kids (5 and 2 respectively) "just because". It's really nice to be able to raise your own kids, I've heard horror stories from America and it's so sad how anti-family the maternal leave is there and I'v…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:32 PM
12

I disagree that he (or anyone) should be taunted or mocked after induring such a horrible ideal. If you want to, go ahead, but it makes you look like an arse/bitch. And expect people to call you on it.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:14 AM
14

There's no need to even criticize the victim, because his decision was irrelevant and the sole problem with this situation was the crazed woman. What you said was completely unnecessary and could easily be misconstrued as victim shaming. Rape Analogy "You shouldn't have been wanking out so late!" "You shouldn't have walked through that neighborhood!" "You shouldn't have been wearing such sexy clothes!" "You made a very bad decision!" All of these points are irrelevant and are just said to make t…
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:38 AM
33

You're saying it was partly his fault that he went to her, that's like saying it was partly a woman's fault to wear a skirt and she got raped. You ARE blaming the victim, at least on some level. The guy trusted her and she took advantage, he obviously still respected her enough to use her services, too bad she was a vindictive witch. Not his fault in the slightest.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:16 AM
2

So, vanity? ;) But you're an adult and if you want it done, then you can. You should not, however, mutilate your newborn offspring. Let them make the same decision on their own. I know a lot of men that love their penises just the way they are naturally and a lot of women that like them that way too, me being one of them. And I've never known an intact man to have hygiene problems in my personal experience, this makes me think perhaps you should consult a doctor? That's not normal. Good luck!
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter