ModernApothecary Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women those are some solid points, and you're correct I was thinking in the context of an entire public organization, which BBC is not!	/r/MensRights	01/02/18 04:05 PM
1	After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women It's entirely possible that all of you are grossly overpaid. it's just enormously improbable when compared to the likelihood that they're all being underpaid. which is more likely, a company exists while overpaying each employee (and somehow not passing this added cost on to their customers), or a company exists while underpaying each employee (and either offers customers a more competitive price on product or has a better cost:profit ratio going forward)? I mean of course it's POSSIBLE that eve…	/r/MensRights	01/02/18 01:52 AM
4	Drunk woman sexually assaulted a gay man at a party in 'sickening' attack. 'The punishment was ridiculous. I've been told if it was man who did that to a woman, the sentence would be five years in prison', he said. And the Mayans were pretty rad too	/r/MensRights	11/10/17 09:47 PM
6	A man helped a lost toddler find her parents, police say. He was smeared online as a predator and fled town. "why does an older single man want to be a big brother to some young kids anyways?" It rings sickeningly true every time. They'll paint with broad strokes and reverberate loudest.	/r/MensRights	27/06/17 11:56 PM
16	Student has grade docked for using 'mankind' in English paper instead of a gender-neutral alternative Words including the syllable man don't come with a "This syllable man is not derived from the word man as you know it but another gender-neutral word that just happened to evolve to sound the same" warning, and it's very easy to just assume that there might be a relation. I get that, but we're talking about an assumption. There aren't any words that come with a warning phrase explaining them, that's up to the person who is using the words. The word bears no responsibility to define itself to the…	/r/MensRights	31/03/17 01:00 PM
18	College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women \| Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do them Jessica we need you to actually try to hit the safety net when you're tossing people out of the burning building. They're going 100, 125, 150 meters past the net! And furthermore, why have you set up these 100, 125, and 150 meter markers past the net!?	/r/MensRights	23/01/17 06:19 PM
1	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet I would apreciate it if for the duration of our interaction you refrained from the term 'females'. Women or woman is the more polite term. Just as I have said men and not males. The red flag was in the first sentence, it wants to control how we speak. Censoring and manipulating language is only the most used tool on the feminist toolbelt. Same bullshit sanitizing in this example: Every time a 14 year old boy is involved sexually with an adult, he was having an affair, but when a 14 year old girl…	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 05:27 AM
1	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet You can pile as many pieces of shit together and call it a mountain, stand on it, survey the surrounding peasants, but dude, you're mentally standing on a pile of shit.	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 05:14 AM
2	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet And yet here are teens being convicted of exploiting themselves by a law you repeatedly say has a sole purpose or protecting them from exploiting themselves. you and Ben Shapiro should go outside in the sunshine for a break from all the basement trolling. Using that dude to back up your argument is like punctuating the end of a sentence with a loud belch.	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 05:08 AM
1	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 05:02 AM
2	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet except that contradicts your statement that the recipient of the CP is the exploiter, if a minor sends unsolicited nude photos to an adult, or a minor.	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 04:57 AM
2	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet it's identical to the drunk consent debate. If you're both drunk, neither of you can consent. Are you both rapists? Common sense says no, /u/mwobuddy seems to think yes.	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 04:27 AM
1	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet Please don't cherry pick, I've responded to the majority of your points, I'd appreciate if you responded to more than two. Ah it turns out you're just posting this reply in installments. Please brush up on your Reddiquette, this is a very deleterious way to carry a debate. If by driving force you mean motivation, a term that is a lot more... real, then yeah you're right, both are motivated by sexuality. You can't seriously claim that we should criminalize things driven by sexuality simply becaus…	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 04:16 AM
1	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet They then send naked photos of themselves to others, which is no different to mass sending naked photos of themselves to others via playboy or hustler in the 70's. I'd disagree, and point out that Playboy and Hustler are businesses which turned a profit as a result of publishing/distributing these pictures, while the worst we can expect a 16 year old to do is share the photo with a half-dozen friends. It's just like two drunk people hooking up. Neither are capable of giving consent. Are both rap…	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 03:40 AM
1	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet You believe a 16 year old is rightfully convicted of possession of child pornography for having photos of himself on a cell phone? Could you expand on why? I'm here to discuss not to shame or berate, so I'm not gonna get all high-horse on you, I just want to know why you think it's appropriate to convict minors with pictures of themselves or other minors?	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 03:10 AM
1	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet It's a truly boggling scenario. The only, ONLY way, that I can see it being a fair/just conviction is if the person who took the pictures of themselves or of their partner and was trying to distribute them online in some way, like especially if specifically selling it as child porn, then I get it, yeah they're doing an adult criminal act and they're a minor. But beyond that OUTRAGEOUSLY SPECIFIC circumstance, I can't understand why the judge wouldn't immediately throw the prosecutor out. I wish …	/r/MensRights	20/01/17 05:33 AM
7	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet That's a very good point. If they're out of prison then they should not be dangerous anymore, I know it isn't a hard truth but people get it in their heads that sexual criminals are more likely to reoffend as it's "part of who they are" that is criminal, so it makes people comfortable to put those folks on a list. People's comfort shouldn't border on violating human rights. Perhaps a "Repeated violent sex crime list"? And after you have been without a crime for 5 or 10 years or something then th…	/r/MensRights	20/01/17 05:26 AM
9	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet Let's make a discussion of it, cause I think you're both kind of right. On your point, yeah I'd definitely like to see the sex-offender registry exist, it makes me much more comfortable with criminal rehabilitation to know that I will be able to see any rehabilitated sex offenders in my area (ie out of prison, any length of time). But if it's ruining thousands of innocent kids' lives just for my peace of mind... (because realistically most people aren't going to do anything about a sex-offender …	/r/MensRights	19/01/17 11:01 PM
10	Thanks to Donations from MensRights, Austin, a teen boy prosecuted for child porn after received pictures from his girlfriend, won't go to prison or register as a sex offender, but his mistreatment by the state still isn't over yet That's fucking appalling! I mean at 17 you can still be old enough to understand that you're raping someone, but to think that a portion (even 1% is over 2000 kids) of these sex offenders were arrested for child porn of themselves or a partner, or some other non-violent sex crime is beyond insanity. Holy fuck how is this happening!? How are these judges and prosecutors still certified?!	/r/MensRights	19/01/17 10:48 PM
2	Need help. My daughters mom just dropped a bomb. I'm saying demonstrate your worth That's the part everyone is taking issue with, although I think a fair few of us know that lawyering up is the only real way to get your custody back, even if the odds aren't good enough for you. If you were in the situation, you'd take the odds you were dealt, and increase them by paying for a lawyer if you could. An abundance of evidence of men not gaining legal custody who have paid for a lawyer isn't a valid reason to advise people against paying for a lawye…	/r/MensRights	22/08/16 01:28 PM
3	Need help. My daughters mom just dropped a bomb. You're blatantly saying that the money would be better spent on pleasing the baby-momma. And you say in spite of the evidence people still pay for lawyers, insinuating there is evidence that paying for a lawyer in a situation like this is a waste of effort or money, or that it would be better spent elsewhere (returning to your original point) and yet, no evidence!	/r/MensRights	22/08/16 01:16 PM
8	Need help. My daughters mom just dropped a bomb. Despite all the evidence you're right, your comments are completely without evidence for these claims you make.	/r/MensRights	22/08/16 12:31 PM
27	Need help. My daughters mom just dropped a bomb. Walk like a man, make her realise she wants you on her side, make her grow up and take responsibility. : \| You never go full retard.	/r/MensRights	22/08/16 11:48 AM
7	Teenage girl posts photo on Facebook of a man she thought was filming her. Turns out the man is innocent, has special needs and is half blind, and his family now fears for his safety after backlash. No, silly. All the men have to wear blindfolds.	/r/MensRights	17/06/16 07:28 PM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Right, the dozen of us that downvoted your original post are all idiots, we all misunderstood your supreme intelligence, and now you're just trying to inject whatever issue you can to steer the discussion away from YOUR assumption that this assumption you've thought up is "the norm" at all. This has nothing to do with you butchering a run on sentence and literally everyone who read it had a problem with it, that's not this, this is just all of us are stupid, and you're so right to bring up all t…	/r/MensRights	31/05/16 01:34 AM
1	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. the immediate response not just from feminists but the most of the general public would be "but men started the wars anyway". You're just retarded man, get the fuck out. Nobody gives a damn how you rephrase it. Quite the overreaction from you. Feel like an idiot yet? Last time I checked, your opinion meant nothing, so no. Fuck, is anyone on this sub capable of considering multiple viewpoints at the same time? Are mine and two or three other commenter's opinions, and the handful of downvotes you'…	/r/MensRights	30/05/16 03:58 PM
3	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. You didn't even mention your assumption in your reply, don't dodge the question. What makes you think there's an assumption that it's the GENDER of the world leaders which ah fuck you never mind, ya cunt. Go fuck off out of the forum if you're gonna not even address what you're being accosted for. You can spew plenty of good arguments, why bother even including that you thought it was the world leader's dongs which started the great wars? Nobody gives a fuck about what the argument is or was, wh…	/r/MensRights	30/05/16 03:38 AM
3	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. Your figures for male deaths in those two wars are not only inaccurate, but irrelevant without comparative data on female deaths and a refutation of the assumption that the gender of world leaders at the time influenced the course of the war. Actually, you pointed out that OP isn't making a relevant argument unless he REFUTES THE ASSUMPTION (not ops cross to bear) that the gender of world leaders at the time influenced the course of the war. That's what anyone with half a brain has a problem wit…	/r/MensRights	30/05/16 03:01 AM
8	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. I agree with what you just said, but it doesn't explain what you said earlier. What's all this about "the gender of world leaders influenced the course of the war"? I hope you don't mean to say the dicks swinging between world leaders legs are the reason the great wars happened...	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 01:57 PM
9	Just posting this to remind feminists visiting that we do not advocate the following. the gender of world leaders at the time influenced the course of the war. The fuck are you talking about?	/r/MensRights	29/05/16 01:32 PM
14	First time talking to a kid in my class about sexism, of course it's a boy Thanks for giving it to him straight, the more boys raised with an awareness of these things, the better for boys and girls in schools. I work at an elementary school and a gymnastics gym in the evenings, and the female to male ratio is 4-1 at best.	/r/MensRights	25/05/16 02:27 PM
2	Another footballer cleared of rape? This just in, men with access to large sums of money have spontaneously begun raping in record numbers.	/r/MensRights	07/05/16 10:11 PM
1	A biology professor and clinical psychologist speak about the case of David Reimer, dramatized in a new play in MensRights SubReddit You mean I'm not in line to get seats for the play right now? Where am I? I'm so CONFUSED!	/r/MensRights	22/04/16 08:43 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? keep bringing it up? I brought it up once, you rebutted, I rebutted, that second rebuttal of mine isn't me bringing it back up you moron, that's what a debate is. You make points why you think it's extreme (you said it looked like he had a kidney stone after I said extreme would be a kidney stone), and I make counterpoints to those points as to why I don't think they qualify as validation for using the word extreme. This is unreal, you're actually mentally ill! I'm only just now realizing it! De…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 10:15 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? I'm not really trying to get under your skin, I could care less, you've had this reddit account for 8 days, and when you delete it because of something stupid you said, as I suspect is the reason you have a fresh reddit account, it won't really matter whether you found something you mistook as efforts to get under your skin as laughable. You're still not gonna address anything from the original argument, you're on to the greener pasture that is "the effect of your insults"? Sad. Listen, this is …	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 10:12 PM
1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? No you cried wolf that I was attacking you when really I threw a few insults into a post, the bulk of which otherwise addressed your points, and my points went unaddressed as a result. So really, devolving into crying to mommy every time someone calls you a retard for being retarded is more detrimental to the productive discussion as you actually avoid my points, whereas me making insults is less detrimental to the productive discussion because while insulting you I don't stop reading your point…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 09:57 PM
1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? I am talking about this entire comment section, everything you have said. First you give an unacceptably vague response to my lead question, I'm certain if you looked through the comments to find a quote, you'd see that you were mistaken, because I never said anyone should react a certain way, I'm just as entitled to an opinion on someones hypothetical reaction(the spitting scenario) as they are entitled to an opinion on the interviewers reaction (the actual scenario). You say this whole episode…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 09:48 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? acknowledge that ad homenin means making personal attacks instead of responding with a logical argument Your words, not mine.	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 09:29 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? The substance: let me put it in crayon is an insult, not ad hominem. second quote has nothing to do with ad hominem, we're talking about how /u/dungone says he would be fine with the reporter standing up, saying he has a sick/pregnant/girlfriend/wife at home, spitting in the interviewees faces, and then storming out of the interview, which is after all a hypothetical situation. Saying I want to be as disassociated or high as this individual seems to be isn't an ad hominem attack either, wow thre…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 09:14 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? The message isn't a message, it's just drivel, so the messenger isn't a messenger, he's a drooling moron. let me put it in crayon is an insult, not ad hominem. second quote has nothing to do with ad hominem, we're talking about how /u/dungone says he would be fine with the reporter standing up, saying he has a sick/pregnant/girlfriend/wife at home, spitting in the interviewees faces, and then storming out of the interview, which is after all a hypothetical situation. Saying I want to be as disas…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 08:57 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? When did I try to tell people how they should react to that situation? I merely reacted to someone saying they would be fine with the interviewer spitting in the interviewees faces and ending the interview. Your use of the adjective extreme is just as bad as a feminist calling a man a rapist for "leering" at her. It's hyperbolic drivel that removes the possibility for any reasonable discussion, biasing any responses toward a typical affirming "yeah all X are pigs" response. I'm not criticizing a…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 08:56 PM
-1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? You two have a long, happy, ignorant life together. let me put it in crayon is an insult, not ad hominem. second quote has nothing to do with ad hominem, we're talking about how /u/dungone says he would be fine with the reporter standing up, saying he has a sick/pregnant/girlfriend/wife at home, spitting in the interviewees faces, and then storming out of the interview, which is after all a hypothetical situation. Saying I want to be as disassociated or high as this individual seems to be isn't …	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 08:46 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? Extreme discomfort: http://www.research.bayer.com/img/27/Endometriose/endometriose-03-545.jpg http://www.denznet.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Chest-Pain-Left-Side-Under-Breast.jpg the first two pictures on google image search for "extreme discomfort". nowhere do I see a red face or someone shifting from side to side. There's nothing extreme about how uncomfortable the interviewer was, it's pretty hyperbolic to call that extreme, disingenuous really.	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 08:40 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? You didn't state "this is my opinion" in any of your comments, but I knew they were your opinions. I'm merely stating my contrary experience. Your opinions are in fact trumped by experiences, though they're not invalidated.	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 08:00 PM
-1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? I see you still don't understand Ad Hominem fallacy.	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 07:56 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? haha That guy looked like he had a kidney stone really... that's what you're going to say to validate your claim that he is "extremely (does the word extreme not relate directly to extremities / extremism for you?) uncomfortable. There was nothing EXTREME about anything in this interview, and I doubt that you're qualified to judge whether someone has a kidney stone lodged in their urethra very accurately. You've lived a very sheltered life if that's what you consider to be "constant sexualized o…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 07:03 PM
-1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? Shift the goal posts? You are going to accuse me of shifting the goal posts in our discussion? YOU of all people? That's hilarious. Let me put it in crayon, so that you might grasp this: First you said: Who cares how he acts? He's not being hired to act as their escort. Then I said: I think the network that hired him cares how he acts. So no, you don't get to turn that around and pretend that: "If the network dared to "care" how he acted in this situation? They would have a losing sexual harassm…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 06:45 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? extremely uncomfortable you know, like when an attractive woman says "you're very attractive, do you work out?" Extremely uncomfortable isn't a description for being told you look good, it's a description for having an inch diameter kidney stone lodged in your urethra. There's nothing extremely uncomfortable about being told you're attractive, perhaps embarrassing.	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 06:36 PM
1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? yeah he's really being disadvantaged as a result of the one or two comments that said he was kind of awkward and didn't know how to handle being talked to in that way. You're creating this whole white-knight "Nobody should have to be treated like a piece of meat" nonsense delusional argument for nothing, a mountain out of a mole hill. if you're(the actress being interviewed) going come onto someone in front of millions of people on national television, they're going to react as they will and you…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 06:32 PM
1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? I would have had no problem if he had spit in their faces. How did I backpedal from that? Here I'll show you: This is me asking: Would it be acceptable to spit in his face for his comments? I asked you a pretty specific question, no need to beat around the bush, just answer it! Do you think spitting in somoene's face is an acceptable way of expressing offense taken? This is you backpedaling: That's not really the point. The point is don't judge him. But yes, if the genders were reversed, then it…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 06:30 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? You have no valid argument to make. Aw that's cute you found someone with whom you have so much in common!	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 06:14 PM
1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? Who is turning around and blaming anyone for anything? Straw man argument, activate! Has the actress in question publicly shamed the reporter for not taking the comments better (they were taken just fine so I don't see why she would)? I'm still waiting for you to find adequate justification for spitting in the ladies' faces and walking off the set, and proof/examples that demonstrate that he should not be expected to act professionally in the face of comments like "you're very attractive, do you…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 06:13 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? I think the network that hired him cares how he acts. The comment I am currently replying to is 100% feminist dogma. "Nobody can tell me I look pretty or ugly unless I'm asking for it (insinuating that escorts and prostitutes "deserve" to be judged on their appearance, because they made bad decisions)". Please evaluate where you get your ideologies from.	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 06:04 PM
1	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? So now instead of spitting in someones face, you're backpedaling and comparing it to throwing a glass of water in someones face. IIRC, a little while back there was a story of a woman who stuck her stiletto into a guy's eyeball because he tried to flirt with her friend. She got off with barely a slap on her wrist. No. Don't believe every post title you read. Go read the actual story, the opinion you formed on that interaction should not have been "he tried to flirt with her friend, and got stabb…	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 05:56 PM
2	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? The lesson here is that ONLY male escorts and prostitutes can be expected to react to jokes or comments which are sexual in nature. I mean, I'm a doctor, so when someone called me attractive I completely lost control of my brain and mouth, you know, since I don't have experience in selling my body. /s.	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 05:49 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? Would it be acceptable to spit in his face for his comments? I asked you a pretty specific question, no need to beat around the bush, just answer it! Do you think spitting in somoene's face is an acceptable way of expressing offense taken? Edit: I'd prefer if you replied instead of changing your previous comments, that's counterproductive.	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 05:36 PM
0	Can you imagine the outcry WE would face? You'd have no problem with someone spitting in your face if you said they were attractive and that your friend might be interested in them? Try to see this interaction without gender, would it still be appropriate to spit in someones face in response to their comment?	/r/MensRights	02/02/16 05:21 PM
1	News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force Awakens you're right, I ought to change that to say humanoids	/r/MensRights	07/01/16 04:31 AM
5	News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force Awakens Alien Furbies on steroids who communicate with humans humanoids by gargling!	/r/MensRights	06/01/16 10:52 PM
9	News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force Awakens space kung-fu monks with intermittent magical powers, there, WE COVERED EVERYTHING. shit... we forgot the robots and aliens. heh	/r/MensRights	06/01/16 10:50 PM
20	News outlets falsely accuses Men's Right Activists of trying to Boycott Star Wars: Force Awakens Space priests, space wizards, space-anything sounds silly, but technically isn't wrong.	/r/MensRights	06/01/16 10:35 PM
4	Britain's largest sperm bank bans men with dyslexia, autism and ADHD from donating, triggering outrage over 'eugenics'. But no ban on women donating eggs that carry these traits. Depends, do the glasses make you look smart? Or like bubbles from trailer park boys?	/r/MensRights	29/12/15 10:48 PM
14	Britain's largest sperm bank bans men with dyslexia, autism and ADHD from donating, triggering outrage over 'eugenics'. But no ban on women donating eggs that carry these traits. I think you misunderstood, he means as far as the sperm banks can see, if I'm not diagnosed, I don't have a disease	/r/MensRights	29/12/15 10:47 PM
5	Over 17k people liked this There is no true feminist, it's how they worm their way out of taking accountability for the minority of members of their group that act like morons. Just like some of the guys in our subreddit are trying to dismiss the few MRAs that make up red pill bullshit as "not real MRAs, they're Red Pillers" but both groups should take responsibility for their small but loud groups of idiots and put them in their place. It's just like the non-vocal majority of cops who want to just do their job and go hom…	/r/MensRights	22/12/15 03:33 PM
8	Hey there, Kettle. This is Pot. You're black. [x-post from /r/TrollXChromosomes] 2nd top comment: "so... he's single?" So someone's sexual activity/relationship status is now a diagnostic tool which identifies "evil MRA ideologies". Great.	/r/MensRights	17/12/15 11:06 PM
2	27-year-old Nagraj's dream of making a mark as a teacher were shattered mid-way. His wedding, which was just a few days away, was called off. He lost his job. He was locked up in jail for 95 days. s he was accused in fake rape case. totes inappropes bro!	/r/MensRights	10/12/15 03:24 PM
33	Saw this on Facebook Who is doing all the raping!?!? seriously!	/r/MensRights	09/12/15 04:33 PM
3	Girl admits she lied about rape, man still charged. Now he's back in jail for going to a job interview while on probation for a false conviction. Welcome to the future	/r/MensRights	04/12/15 11:16 PM
1	A mother who falsely claimed a Primark security guard snatched her baby from her while she was breastfeeding has been given a suspended jail sentence. (In English: Lying bitch gets off scot free) but secretly you must have wanted someone to ask if you even mentioned it no, you're just an asshole. That's the equivalent of when people go all vaguebook on Facebook and type "really mad today!" not. at. all. equivalent. You know what I hear when I read your reply right now? "I'm sorry for your loss Immediately change tone I was ONLY saying it because this and this and this and it's reasonable because this and this and you're just like this and this and it was fair to bring that point up becau…	/r/MensRights	04/12/15 03:50 AM
2	A mother who falsely claimed a Primark security guard snatched her baby from her while she was breastfeeding has been given a suspended jail sentence. (In English: Lying bitch gets off scot free) Well she's dead, but the reason I try not to talk about her is because we were friends in elementary school and in high school she completely went off the deep end, gave herself an abortion, ended up staying with the guy and trying to have kids. several pregnancies, none "took". Killed herself, not sure if related to the possibility of not being able to have kids, but it left a lot of friends and family really confused. That's why I don't elaborate on it ¯ \ (ツ)/¯	/r/MensRights	03/12/15 06:08 PM
2	A mother who falsely claimed a Primark security guard snatched her baby from her while she was breastfeeding has been given a suspended jail sentence. (In English: Lying bitch gets off scot free) 17 miscarriages or is that a lie? Either she was that way from birth by a defect or she's given herself an abortion with something nasty and now can't hold a baby to term. I knew a girl. I won't be typing that story today.	/r/MensRights	03/12/15 05:14 PM
1	I am getting kicked out of my lunch table. I understand, in hindsight that was a pretty inappropriate joke to make.	/r/MensRights	20/11/15 02:50 PM
0	Male teachers abandon classroom fearing inappropriate label of working with children; Department of Education says recruitment policies can not be employed to attract males into teaching because that would unlawfully discriminate on the grounds of gender Right, /r/conspiracy called, they want you back, the average IQ in the sub just reached 100 and they need to bring it back down.	/r/MensRights	19/11/15 07:13 AM
1	Male teachers abandon classroom fearing inappropriate label of working with children; Department of Education says recruitment policies can not be employed to attract males into teaching because that would unlawfully discriminate on the grounds of gender Hey dudes, I'm downvoting him now" I'm still currently registering a big orange upvote, so, dunno where you got that. Upvotes are for visibility, not because we agree or disagree, so many people don't understand that simple fact on reddit. furthermore, you didn't stop to think "maybe he's saying I retract my show of support in a theatrical/comedic sense, and that he's being hyperbolic to poke fun at the fact that I said something stupid"? Because, that's what I was thinking when I wrote it, it w…	/r/MensRights	19/11/15 07:02 AM
0	Male teachers abandon classroom fearing inappropriate label of working with children; Department of Education says recruitment policies can not be employed to attract males into teaching because that would unlawfully discriminate on the grounds of gender Don't mistake your frustration that people didn't understand your joke (because it wasn't phrased very well) for me being "fucky" haha. You're sounding more like a douche than I did 15 days ago when I wrote my initial comment and then edited it. If I missed your joke, that's my bad, but now you're just being rude Furthermore, the comment you are replying to said: Interesting fact about the Sandy Hook massacre. All of the adults killed were women... because there were only two male employees at t…	/r/MensRights	19/11/15 06:50 AM
13	Male University of York Student Commits Suicide on Day His University Ditches International Men's Day After Pressure From Feminists Spoken like a true narcissist, verified.	/r/MensRights	18/11/15 10:58 PM
10	Boy, 9, faces sexual harassment charges for passing love note in class Or worse, a member of the 4chan tribe.	/r/MensRights	17/11/15 05:12 PM
1	I think I hate my English teacher. yep you're 100% right, I just want to be clear that I didn't mean to be "pulling (this) shit" or "attacking the right" or "being dismissive of" any wrongs the left does, my "but seriously" comment spans all political ideologies, the joke at the start was just a joke, not meant to say that only the right does this or that the right is any worse than the left.	/r/MensRights	14/11/15 05:27 PM
10	I think I hate my English teacher. is the 70's when the catholic church was founded? joking, but seriously, indoctrinating children with our adult beliefs is a serious societal problem, we need to let children develop new beliefs based on their perception of the world, not hammer our own into their heads.	/r/MensRights	14/11/15 01:55 PM
2	One of the Most Down-Voted Redditors ever From an AMA on Consent Shows How Reddit Skews Votes in Favor of Radical Feminism... Her User Page Shows 29 Comment Up-Votes, but Actually has almost 2000 Down-Votes and not a Single Real Up-Vote Present in Her History of 13 Days as a Redditor. ugh, fucking, just ugh, we need to have a secret patriarchy meeting, STAT.	/r/MensRights	08/11/15 03:42 PM
10	One of the Most Down-Voted Redditors ever From an AMA on Consent Shows How Reddit Skews Votes in Favor of Radical Feminism... Her User Page Shows 29 Comment Up-Votes, but Actually has almost 2000 Down-Votes and not a Single Real Up-Vote Present in Her History of 13 Days as a Redditor. But, more often, when men are victimized, it tends to be by other men. Women certainly can be perpetrators as well, but not to the same degree. let's just acknowledge that. I've never seen a statistic supporting this particularly infuriating tidbit.	/r/MensRights	08/11/15 03:02 PM
62	Female equal rights activist in Sweden says fathers don't need a Fathers day, because they simply don't deserve it. This is the definition of daddy issues	/r/MensRights	08/11/15 02:52 PM
5	No Jail, Only $500 Fine for 21-Year-Old Woman Who Hit, Killed Motorcyclist While Driving/Texting It was a plea deal, on account of having little evidence that she was criminally negligent. I think she should also have her license revoked and have to take driving school to be allowed to reapply for the license, after a period of maybe 6 months to a year.	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 09:17 PM
1	No Jail, Only $500 Fine for 21-Year-Old Woman Who Hit, Killed Motorcyclist While Driving/Texting Sometimes you are the first one and there are only 2 or 3 comments taking the obvious narrative. Be the change you want to see in the world!	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 09:14 PM
2	No Jail, Only $500 Fine for 21-Year-Old Woman Who Hit, Killed Motorcyclist While Driving/Texting That's a possibility, but definitely not hard evidence for court, especially considering the witness was contradicted by the vehicle computer data on another part of that same statement.	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 09:13 PM
3	No Jail, Only $500 Fine for 21-Year-Old Woman Who Hit, Killed Motorcyclist While Driving/Texting I never meant to imply that had he been driving a car he would be alive, or that it was his choice to ride a bike and that is why he is dead, could you point out which sentence made you feel that way?	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 06:53 PM
5	No Jail, Only $500 Fine for 21-Year-Old Woman Who Hit, Killed Motorcyclist While Driving/Texting I'm not saying she should only get a 500 dollar fine only carries the implication that I believe more punishment would be suitable, but I get what you mean, I was only implying it and not outright saying it as Sawb1ade did. It's a slap on the wrist, and that's inappropriate considering the consequences of her actions ended a life.	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 06:20 PM
3	Thought this was interesting (seen at my son's school book sale) The infamous gay agenda rears it's fabulous head.	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 03:59 PM
20	No Jail, Only $500 Fine for 21-Year-Old Woman Who Hit, Killed Motorcyclist While Driving/Texting I'm not saying she should only get a 500 dollar fine, but I don't really see this as a clear cut "send that bitch to jail" case. Which I did say in the comment you are replying to.	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 03:53 PM
2	Leaked Hillary Clinton White House Wonder Woman Campaign Ad Don't worry, she'll lose to Trump. oh my god... ahah	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 03:49 PM
3	Man convicted of squirting a woman with a water pistol. Would a woman be convicted of this? gags	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 03:37 PM
193	No Jail, Only $500 Fine for 21-Year-Old Woman Who Hit, Killed Motorcyclist While Driving/Texting The six initial charges had been based on evidence at the scene and witness accounts. However, as a representative for the Attorney’s Office said, additional police work revealed conflicting evidence, which led to Meyers’ plea deal. Can we address this? Accounting for the lessened sentence, in part, was the fact that although cellphone records have indicated that Meyers had sent text messages one to two minutes before the collision, they did not prove that she had been texting at the time of the…	/r/MensRights	07/11/15 03:04 PM
12	Woman charged with raping 13 year old boy : Article instead describes it as "having sex in her car on a clear, cold Monday night last spring" Can you imagine how long it would be if the perpetrator were a black man? You're right, of course, i'm just playing devils advocate.	/r/MensRights	06/11/15 02:30 AM
9	3 minor kidnappers, only 2 are named and charged We'll name minors if they're boys, but this poor innocent young girl needs protecting!	/r/MensRights	05/11/15 06:55 PM
1	Feminists Are Trying To Frame Linus Torvalds For Sexual Assault It'll be my new experiment in self-control. I have a tendency to overstep/overspeak the line from time to time.	/r/MensRights	05/11/15 01:48 AM
2	Feminists Are Trying To Frame Linus Torvalds For Sexual Assault Good point, the title was written by someone else, I didn't notice that it was an account called "uberfeminist" which could either be be a feminist or an anti-feminist depending on sarcasm lol. I thought the title(or tweet? what is that, is that a tweet? I've avoided Twitter for so long that people half my age know more about it than I do lol) was part of the announcement	/r/MensRights	05/11/15 01:46 AM
2	Feminists Are Trying To Frame Linus Torvalds For Sexual Assault I wish you never told me that sub exists... Oh I wish I didn't just discover this... This is not good for my mental health lol. Or my blood pressure!	/r/MensRights	05/11/15 01:43 AM
3	Feminists Are Trying To Frame Linus Torvalds For Sexual Assault I agree! it's a puzzler... Even more puzzling is that a couple people have downvoted that post. Did I overstep a line?	/r/MensRights	04/11/15 06:44 PM
22	Feminists Are Trying To Frame Linus Torvalds For Sexual Assault I understand the need for female role models in organizations like these (lets be honest, the organization caters to young women, those young women like a female ceo(massive generalization, forgive me)), but is it really more important to have a female CEO than it is for the organization to exist? They're gonna shut down because they can't find another woman capable of the job... Why not consider a man? I mean... the organization would still be for the benefit of young women, it seems silly that…	/r/MensRights	04/11/15 06:15 PM
57	Feminists Are Trying To Frame Linus Torvalds For Sexual Assault God forbid they consider hiring a male ceo, that would be heinous!	/r/MensRights	04/11/15 04:17 PM
0	Male teachers abandon classroom fearing inappropriate label of working with children; Department of Education says recruitment policies can not be employed to attract males into teaching because that would unlawfully discriminate on the grounds of gender Oh totally, I just quickly read the post, I wasn't triggered by/didn't notice the word fact, but you're definitely right, there's no world in which calling a conspiracy theory a fact is okay, at all. I retract my show of support!	/r/MensRights	03/11/15 04:38 PM
6	Male teachers abandon classroom fearing inappropriate label of working with children; Department of Education says recruitment policies can not be employed to attract males into teaching because that would unlawfully discriminate on the grounds of gender Would or HAS?	/r/MensRights	03/11/15 04:09 PM
1	Male teachers abandon classroom fearing inappropriate label of working with children; Department of Education says recruitment policies can not be employed to attract males into teaching because that would unlawfully discriminate on the grounds of gender Don't sweat the downvotes, people refuse to accept that they CAN easily be manipulated by the thought of women and children suffering. edit: Now that I've noticed, calling a theory a fact is dumb.	/r/MensRights	03/11/15 04:08 PM
5	Celebrity women who had to pay spousal support That's it? 6 people?	/r/MensRights	28/10/15 03:55 PM
1	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t How does arguing over the definition of a white knight prove your point that being vitriolic is not constructive? Because I've already hit the nail on the head, I just keep coming back to see what stupid thing you'll use to try to weasel out of addressing your argument's shortcomings. (See you've avoided replying to this one altogether, because you don't have an easy out, case in point.)	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 02:58 PM
1	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t You haven't been on that point for a solid day now, you're just jumping from argument to argument, when you find a new one you think will be easy you take that instead of addressing the bulk of my reply. Like who gives a fuck if the definition of white knight is dependent upon the pursuit of physical sex, that's definitely not an actual debate worth having, just a pedantic side-story in your quest for self-respect. It's a shame, really. You've been so condescending but it's clearly a projection …	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 02:48 PM
1	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t That's fine for you, but having a dozen strangers agree with my viewpoint, and seeing you desperately trying to change the topic of debate, that's confirmation for me that you're just a sad little person who has to argue with people to give himself worth.	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 02:28 PM
1	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet+White+Knight lmfao you're pathetic haha	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 02:24 PM
0	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t hey look at you, you're just as out of touch and retarded as /u/TheRavenousRabbit	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 12:58 AM
1	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t You can be a little whiny bitch and complain about people who are mad for a legitimate reason, that's always constructive. Now I know why you're so mad in the other thread, it's because you're in 3/4 other threads in this post, and they're all downvoted into oblivion lmfao. Stupid idiot.	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 12:52 AM
1	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t Right, because sex is the only thing that turns males against one another in a white knight fashion. You use an unrealistically narrow definition of white knight, make cute little snips like I can't understand what a white knight is (ad hominem, a pathetic one at that), and you claim that even if my points are worth noting, that reality is the way it is. You sir, are out of excuses.	/r/MensRights	27/10/15 12:50 AM
0	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t I'm gay, so I'm literally, by definition, not able to become a white knight. Slow clap. The mental gymnastics this one must have taken deserve commendation. Great work tricking yourself into believing something so ridiculous, I know plenty of gay people who are vehemently against Men's Rights Activism because they think it's red pill nonsense about how to "hunt" women. When you act like a child, discuss people instead of ideas, then you do ruin the things you touch. Vitriolic. expressing vitriol…	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 06:47 PM
0	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t Right, well since you're in the minority and people like me who don't mind being rude to people who express and act on intent to ruin lives are in the majority, maybe you'll at least have the sense to see yourself out? You're a weak willed pantywaste and you'll be the first of us to turn around and leap into the white knight role when given the chance.	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 06:19 PM
1	Canada's feminist Prime Minister Justin Trudeau targets GamerGate in anti-misogyny call to action That's a good start, but the problem with this is that the people who make up the parties change over the years, and the parties don't necessarily represent the values they were founded upon. The Liberals this election are pretty central (on the federal level, don't get me started on our ding-bat of a provincial representative Kathleen Wing-it), the conservatives are farther right than they were in 90s (my only frame of reference), and I know diddly squat about the NDP.	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 06:03 PM
0	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t Are you confusing the public relations of a university with the "dominant opinion among higher academics"? Or is "safe spaces" just a trigger word which sends you into a knee jerk reaction? I wish you a well evening. Go fuck yourself	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 05:58 PM
4	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t Except the one we're talking about is a higher academic having his life derailed by the efforts of a tradesperson's uneducated wife. Hmm, maybe morons DON'T dominate higher academics, maybe morons without an education just think that because they've never experienced it!	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 05:52 PM
1	Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00t Not because it's unjustified or because it's wrong, but because it simply paints us, as a group, as rabid dogs willing to tear apart a corpse That's stupid. You know who paints entire groups with the same brush? Morons whose opinions are of little merit to us.	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 04:03 PM
4	Entitled "anti-rape-activist" threatens her date and gets angry when he cancels. Keenan herself, though, sometimes finds it hard not to go on the offensive. She’s so used to laying down the nitty-gritty details of consent that she's been known to open romantic interactions with a spiel that feels straight out of a student handbook. Yeah, she's a real sweetheart.	/r/MensRights	26/10/15 03:30 AM
2	Canada's feminist Prime Minister Justin Trudeau targets GamerGate in anti-misogyny call to action I'm Canadian, Justin Trudeau is an example of a centrist politician.	/r/MensRights	23/10/15 10:25 PM
1	Canada's feminist Prime Minister Justin Trudeau targets GamerGate in anti-misogyny call to action but but but liberal means lefffftttt!!! /s	/r/MensRights	23/10/15 07:10 PM
15	Feminists attack another cathedral in Argentina. Christians put up the same non-violent resistance and riot police step in. literally flinging feces... Are there any native Argentinians here? We need some context!	/r/MensRights	16/10/15 03:05 AM
3	Men's Rights group facing feminist harassment campaign at Ryerson University in Toronto I think you dropped this /s	/r/MensRights	13/10/15 04:30 PM
2	Why gender Studies is not the solution (by analogy): how Neil DeGrasse Tyson helped blacks by being a black scientist I don't have one. It's obvious, to me at least, that OP means Neil DeGrasse Tyson has done more for the collective black community image than any living gender rights activist has for their community. Simply by BEING a personable, successful, (insert X professional here). In his case, science personality. There are lots of examples other than NdGT too.	/r/MensRights	09/10/15 07:16 PM
4	Why gender Studies is not the solution (by analogy): how Neil DeGrasse Tyson helped blacks by being a black scientist C'mon. Try harder.	/r/MensRights	09/10/15 04:27 PM
1	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? And can you honestly say you think the court would have handed down the same ruling and sentence to an abusive male who mutilated a female's genitals? Woman have got off murder charges because they were abused. read some of my other comments in this thread, you misunderstand my point of view if you think I think the court would have sentenced a man similarly, in fact I made it perfectly clear that I believe the opposite is true, that she got a slap on the wrist (and suspended to boot) sentence b…	/r/MensRights	21/09/15 03:26 PM
0	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? Corn is good and all, but I prefer soyscented	/r/MensRights	18/09/15 05:24 PM
9	Rapist gets 30 days, community service deceptionnnnn bat_mayns favourite new word lol	/r/MensRights	17/09/15 03:35 PM
2	The institutionalized hostility to the rights of college men is not a "war on men," clucks female writer hey hey hey whoa, don't say that shit around a hen! Totally out of line tiqr, how dare you group hens all together like that! Let's see if chicken get out of this one! (say it with a mexican accent)	/r/MensRights	17/09/15 03:48 AM
1	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? You got all bent out of shape about the difference between will happen and should happen, I hope you realize that. You spoke of what should happen in a perfect world, and I spoke from the viewpoint of what will actually happen in this world. cool rant bro.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 06:49 PM
2	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? To me, they read as "he gave consent and therefore has no legal recourse as a result of said consent". Which, in other words, means his consent overrides the law, because according to you, his consent strips him of any legal grounds of pursuit. That sounds like a you problem, not a me problem. the law recognized there was consent and gave a lesser sentence. You've made my point in a much more succinct way, thank you. It can be inferred from your comments that you believe he "deserved it" because…	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 06:17 PM
3	My very big workplace is required to purchase stuff only from women owned businesses. How the fuck is this legal ? those bastards	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 05:46 PM
1	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? I never claimed consent overrode the law. No more than a contract can remove an inalienable right. but the sentence itself is irrelevant to the discussion I disagree. bceause you have axed yourself on the curcial point being consent I disagree. Read above. (also spend a little time proofreading your replies so they don't come across as rash responses)	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 05:28 PM
2	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? You're absolutely correct, and it further demonstrates the shades of grey in the law, when Meiwes was convicted of manslaughter and not first degree murder.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 05:09 PM
1	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? Bronwyn Joy Parker, 22, had pleaded guilty to recklessly causing serious harm over the incident which left her then boyfriend with third degree burns to his genitalia at her Mount Barker home in December 2013. Just because a judge sentenced her, doesn't mean the law indicates that he didn't give clear consent. There are instances, such as when the party pleads guilty, when consent doesn't need to be proven. You know full well that his consent stands up in court, it's the fact that she pleaded gu…	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 04:35 PM
1	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases If that gives you a laugh, you should check out the votes on other comments in this thread! Now that I've read some of your posts, this is what I hear when you talk: me and my forum friends play pretend and fantasize about the end of organized government, and it biases our worldview because we resent things like "the state" and label anything we perceive as oppressive as "the state" so that it is easier to get behind our point of view. You accused me of "using the state to attack a child". I, a …	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 04:21 PM
0	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? So what was illegitimate about the consent given in this instance? None of your examples apply, so hopefully you have a relevant one? As far as the law is concerned (with all it's circumstances and nuances) he gave clear and undeniable consent. I wish he didn't. I wish he wasn't messed up, or abused, or whatever robs a man of the judgement to protect his dick and balls, but he clearly has no grounds to go after her legally.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 04:17 PM
1	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases Okay keyboard anarchist	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 04:14 PM
1	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases if the guy was mentally ill he should have been diagnosed and treated forging a note isn't a consistent enough indicator that he needs psychological help, if you want to blame someone, blame his parents for not having him seen by a therapist, because they would have had more indication at home that he wasn't right, a lot more indication than the school would have in the year or two that he was present there. Don't blame the school for treating him like they treat every single other person, and t…	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 04:04 PM
2	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases Why should I respect somebody who is more than happy to see student criminalised over something so petty? To be clear, I said: respect the forum and the debate process. so I wasn't asking you to personally respect me. Respect the process of debating logically, remove personal attacks (ad hominem) otherwise you're just slinging feces and not having a productive conversation. This pretty much proves my point regardless though because what your saying is merely 'because' he's mentally ill it doesn'…	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 03:48 PM
1	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases Forging a doctor's signature on an official document is definitely a crime worthy of expulsion from school. That type of behaviour is used primarily to obtain narcotics from pharmacies in order to sell them for profit. It's a lesson he had to learn, that forging a protected professional's signature in order to benefit yourself in some way is totally unacceptable. Not just a little bad. Totally. Unacceptable.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 03:39 PM
0	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases Forging a fucking doctor's note and selling drugs are two completely different crimes Both remain crimes punishable by law, not just "against school rules", which is why the school has to expel him. Break the laws of the country and you should expect to be punished. They can't pick and choose which laws they like and don't like. Forgery creates victims, selling pot at highschool does not. So arguably, forgery can be much worse than selling some pot. Most people who forge a doctors signature do s…	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 03:33 PM
1	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? Yes, it is consent. It's clearly defined in the law. I know morally it sounds like a grey area, but it's anything but. If someone could simply allege previous abuse and claim it was the reason they made a bad decision to give consent for something, then what would stop everyone from doing that when they make a mistake or didn't enjoy the outcome.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 03:04 PM
0	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases And no, I can't blame them for attacking the same social institution that ruined their lives What a load of shit.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 02:51 PM
2	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases everybody taking part in a sophisticated form of emotional abuse He was expelled for forgery. It's a crime. He wasn't expelled for being absent for a few days, he wasn't expelled because the teachers wanted to emotionally abuse him.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 02:49 PM
0	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases he wasn't expelled for missing a couple days, he was expelled for forgery, which is a criminal offense. He should have been expelled, easy decision. If a student is caught selling drugs should they be expelled? Which other laws should we ignore on account of "he's just a student"?	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 02:44 PM
8	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases Yes it has! You're right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erfurt_massacre Unstable person misses school for a few days, forges a doctors note to excuse him, note is revealed by administration to be forgery. Unstable person expelled for forgery. Unstable person returns with handgun and shotgun, kills 13 teachers, 2 students, and a police officer.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 02:06 PM
-4	L.A. Times: Colleges Should Not Use Outside Investigators in Rape Cases And no, I can't blame them for attacking the same social institution that ruined their lives. I don't think their peers, most of whom they didn't know even to put a name to a face, were responsible for ruining their lives. If you're gonna talk about a school massacre caused by a school unfairly expelling a student for being accused of rape, provide an example, don't invent a make-believe situation where by the end of your comment you're exonerating a murderer of blame for a massacre because soci…	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 02:00 PM
0	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? Consent IS consent. Unfortunately.	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 01:43 PM
8	Women burns penis of cheating boyfriend.. Reverse roles here and think of a title? He asked her to. Consent doesn't get revoked just because your idea didn't work out. He later renegotiated that she instead tap his penis instead of clamping his testicles. neeeeext	/r/MensRights	16/09/15 02:38 AM
1	Feminists 'are more likely to watch porn' In perhaps surprising news, people who watched pornography were found by the University of Western Ontario to be more likely to have feminist views Western, the hard hitting research university Ontario needs. aha	/r/MensRights	15/09/15 06:42 PM
0	Charlotte Proudman reported to the Bar Standards Board What a joke that blog is. Modern day witch hunter? What a moron.	/r/MensRights	15/09/15 04:29 AM
2	Hungarian camerawoman filmed kicking and tripping over refugees has defended her actions by claiming that she was frightened This isn't /r/pussypass he said nothing about her getting a pass. it's about her feeble justification based on fear, and the thought that if a man presented that feeble defense, he might face charges, not just lose his part time job at a youtube news channel. she's not getting a pass, but she's not getting a man's punishment either, and that's sort of why this sub exists. If only there were an example of this being perpetrated by a man, we could have an actual conversation in the comments, but f…	/r/MensRights	15/09/15 03:55 AM
3	A SETBACK FOR BOY's RIGHTS: Canadian paediatricians modify position on circumcision....goes from "not recommending routine circumcision" .... To saying it reduces urinary track infections...and other bulls**t vroom vroom, chomp chomp	/r/MensRights	13/09/15 11:36 PM
3	A SETBACK FOR BOY's RIGHTS: Canadian paediatricians modify position on circumcision....goes from "not recommending routine circumcision" .... To saying it reduces urinary track infections...and other bulls**t They have San Peligrino? I thought I was finally off Nestle, now I find out my once in a while fizzy water profits them. DAMMIT.	/r/MensRights	13/09/15 05:44 PM
4	Watching porn does not cause negative attitudes to women, study finds. "From the University of the bleeding obvious". slow clap edit: slow fap	/r/MensRights	13/09/15 03:11 PM
37	Watching porn does not cause negative attitudes to women, study finds. "From the University of the bleeding obvious". Rightey wouldn't do that to me!	/r/MensRights	13/09/15 03:55 AM
3	New campaign at UW-Madison to try and prevent sexual assault. The catch phrase? Don't be that guy. You're right.	/r/MensRights	12/09/15 02:24 AM
7	"SJW Starter Pack" especially since the school threatened to expel me, after I reported being assaulted by a dozen different women from that class, and the police won't take my request to file charges seriously.	/r/MensRights	03/09/15 05:28 PM
1	Guess why The Guardian is mad at a fictional victim of domestic abuse? It can be tough to work with your ex … It can be tough to be the executive producer on your ex’s late-night TV show, especially when your ex is a pig. I don’t know whether any of you have ever dated pigs. ahahahha	/r/MensRights	03/09/15 05:26 PM
17	This woman is literally a psycho (x-post from pussypassdenied,cringepics). I know a women like this, this is sad. I'm mortified that someone actually suggested to keep her on the side in case the wife "loses her shit"? Dear god, is this /r/MensRights or /r/teens?	/r/MensRights	13/08/15 12:27 AM
8	This woman is literally a psycho (x-post from pussypassdenied,cringepics). I know a women like this, this is sad. ooh muay caliente!	/r/MensRights	13/08/15 12:25 AM
7	This woman is literally a psycho (x-post from pussypassdenied,cringepics). I know a women like this, this is sad. He didn't show up for his first shift, I tried to employ him!	/r/MensRights	13/08/15 12:23 AM
1	Sexual assault includes ‘whistling,’ ‘unwanted phrases’ at UC Santa Barbara All I could hear in my head while I was reading was: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8fysvEFIck I'm a SURVIVORRRR, I'm gon work HARRRRDERRR	/r/MensRights	12/08/15 09:50 PM
1	HuffPo writer conflates and represents Roosh's London Pickup Artist seminar as a "Men's Rights Seminar" No. I think you're fucking retarded.	/r/MensRights	11/08/15 05:36 AM
17	Joe Rogan puts a feminist in her place. Total logical, systematic destruction of the feminist narrative. I think your downvotes prove his point, but what do I know, I'm just a lousy beta.	/r/PussyPassDenied	11/08/15 04:16 AM
3	HuffPo writer conflates and represents Roosh's London Pickup Artist seminar as a "Men's Rights Seminar" I prefer the name HuffsomegluePost, but I laughed at yours!	/r/MensRights	11/08/15 04:13 AM
2	HuffPo writer conflates and represents Roosh's London Pickup Artist seminar as a "Men's Rights Seminar" You're a tall drink of pessimism aren't you, /u/sufferingsuffer ? Even your username is apathetically negative.	/r/MensRights	11/08/15 04:12 AM
0	HuffPo writer conflates and represents Roosh's London Pickup Artist seminar as a "Men's Rights Seminar" There is no opt out plan for humanity. Well there is, but it's suicide and I don't recommend it.	/r/MensRights	11/08/15 04:10 AM