TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Modron Archive

View 87 posts and 912 comments by Modron on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1113

OutrageModron/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:58 AM
420

NewsModron/r/MensRights01/01/15 11:20 PM
399

Modron/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:10 AM
276

OutrageModron/r/MensRights23/05/14 07:49 AM
225

Raising AwarenessModron/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:54 AM
208

Modron/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:05 PM
208

Modron/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:55 PM
129

NewsModron/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:52 AM
124

Modron/r/MensRights20/07/13 08:19 PM
119

Modron/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:31 PM
117

Modron/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:46 AM
114

Modron/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:57 AM
109

Modron/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:25 PM
103

Modron/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:08 PM
98

Modron/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:54 PM
81

Modron/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:24 PM
70

Modron/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:23 AM
65

Modron/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:33 PM
65

Modron/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:54 AM
58

Modron/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:06 AM
58

Modron/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:08 PM
56

Modron/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:52 PM
53

Modron/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:30 PM
49

Modron/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:49 PM
41

OpinionModron/r/MensRights22/01/15 03:20 PM
41

Modron/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:43 AM
41

NewsModron/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:09 PM
40

DiscriminationModron/r/MensRights01/01/15 01:55 PM
39

Modron/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:03 PM
37

Modron/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:06 AM
35

Modron/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:33 PM
35

Modron/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:15 AM
35

Modron/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:41 AM
34

OutrageModron/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:10 PM
30

Modron/r/MensRights05/10/13 12:15 PM
27

re: FeminismModron/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:27 PM
26

/r/MensRantsModron/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:41 PM
26

Modron/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:33 PM
26

OutrageModron/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:35 AM
23

Modron/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:40 AM
23

Modron/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:19 AM
22

Modron/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:33 AM
21

StoryModron/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:58 PM
19

Modron/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:27 AM
19

Modron/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:49 PM
18

Modron/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:00 PM
18

Modron/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:54 AM
16

Modron/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:02 AM
15

Modron/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:36 AM
14

Modron/r/MensRights19/05/14 12:12 AM
12

Modron/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:50 AM
11

Modron/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:03 PM
11

Modron/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:30 AM
11

Modron/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:11 PM
10

Social IssuesModron/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:49 PM
9

Modron/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:59 AM
8

Modron/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:24 AM
8

Modron/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:03 AM
8

Modron/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:46 AM
7

Modron/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:36 AM
7

GeneralModron/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:46 PM
6

Modron/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:51 PM
6

Modron/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:45 AM
5

Modron/r/MensRights23/11/12 12:28 PM
5

Modron/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:17 AM
4

Modron/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:15 PM
3

OutrageModron/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:09 AM
3

Modron/r/MensRights05/12/14 06:08 PM
3

Raising AwarenessModron/r/MensRights15/01/15 02:06 AM
3

NewsModron/r/MensRights23/02/15 09:29 AM
3

Modron/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:26 PM
2

NewsModron/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:44 AM
2

DiscussionModron/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:38 PM
2

Modron/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:16 AM
1

Modron/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:59 AM
1

Modron/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:13 PM
1

Modron/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:48 PM
1

Modron/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:55 AM
1

Modron/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:51 AM
0

Modron/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:25 AM
0

Modron/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:34 PM
0

Modron/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:00 PM
0

Modron/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:50 PM
0

Modron/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:08 AM
0

Reverse GendersModron/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:00 PM
0

Modron/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:04 AM
0

Modron/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:22 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

She never groped my genitals but you don't grab your 12 year old sons ass and say "Cute" and then make it into a bidaily activity. Whilst I'd never do that to a child of mine, simply because I'd find it uncomfortable to do it to a child, just about all mothers grab their kids' arses and give it an affectionate squeeze or slap as a joke, just as kids grab their mothers. It's called teasing! That's not abuse, mate. Because if that's abuse, then I've been abused, but I really don't believe it is! N…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 09:25 PM
-1

The hard truth is, if women really wanted equality, we'd have had it long ago. The fact that we're so far from it means that very few women want it. No, it's because you're a jackass. Guys who behave like you don't deserve equality, and that's why you don't get it. Treat women with more respect, and you'll find more women vouching for Men's Rights. I supported it far more when I was on good terms with you. Now I have far less respect for it because I've lost my respect for you. You, and men like…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:40 AM
1

Well, well... https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3gqnpp/woman_realizes_that_shes_been_accidentally/cu1y6xx How does it feel to know that you're an emotional abuser? And you wonder why I got mad at you. Lol. The other person is welcome to you. So glad I don't have to deal with your lies and mind games anymore.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:50 PM
1

For a person to criticize another angrily, and place the blame on them and make them feel bad and worthless(as described in the article) for a mistake that was made by the person doing the criticizing. It is abuse. Emotional abuse. Tell my ex that! When I cool down I take the time to explain to the person my irrational thought process and let them know my expectations when appropriate. Me too. I always admit my mistakes and explain why I behave the way I do, and I apologise. But my ex doesn't, a…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:46 PM
-1

By your statement, you are saying that a man's consent to sex is his consent to parenthood. Nope, I never said that. But the fact is, sex is essentially reproduction. We can take precautions until the cows come home, but biologically, our instinct is to reproduce even if in our mind we don't want children. The only way to make absolutely sure that babies aren't the result, is for both parties to abstain. If a child results from that little one night stand you had, then you're as much to blame as…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:25 PM
1

That's not abuse, mate. That's criticism and expressing her dismay. You mean to say you've never done the same?! If that's abuse, then everyone is an abuser, including my ex, who just LOVED criticising me for his mistakes.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:20 PM
-1

It's not even about getting "hit" it's called discipline. My mom disciplined me out of anger? That's not fucking abuse. Really? You don't need to hit someone out of discipline. There are far more effective ways. Hitting isn't discipline; its abuse. But thanks for making my point! - Scolding someone is similar to discipline. We do it so the other person knows not to do it again. Try telling the OP and half the men on Reddit that, who seem to think that scolding someone is abuse.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:18 PM
2

Hitting is very different from scolding. This article is about scolding, not hitting. Hitting in anger is abuse; scolding isn't. We all need to scold people when we're upset, to tell the other person how we feel, so that they'll learn they've done wrong. It's called communication! Please learn the difference, men! Or do you prefer us to always nod and smile like puppets? If that's the case, fuck a doll.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:41 PM
-2

Guys don't even get the chance. They're just on the hook, and if they complain about it, they're told to 'man up.' Lol. You're alllllll about choice until the women wants a choice. I get it. Men have nothing to do with the impregnation do they? It takes two to tango, mate! If you want choice, maybe you should stop putting your dick into fertile territory, unless you want to pay the price. Maybe you need a license to carry that deadly weapon. And if life begins at conception, maybe men should be …
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:39 PM
1

If you can call a woman telling a guy that he's in the wrong, "abuse"! I mean, come on! If people didn't point out their partner's screw ups, they'd never learn and would think its ok to keep doing the things that upset the other. If her actions are "abusive", then that means you've also abused me for telling me off for doing something that upset you. Lol. Some people's definition of abuse is quite frankly, infantile. The world has turned into a land of pussies.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:45 AM
-4

If your wife told you off for being in the wrong, and you couldn't deal with the fact you screwed up and she told you off, then you need to grow up. That's not abuse, mate.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:35 AM
-7

That's bullshit. You're saying a mother must never scold her kids when they misbehave?! Just imagine the chaos if kids were never told off for doing wrong!
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:31 AM
1

This is complete nonsense. Whilst scolding someone for bringing the wrong item is pathetic, scolding someone for being in the wrong over something more serious, isn't abuse, and we all have the right to scold someone if they've misbehaved or not paid attention after being told about it umpteen times. Otherwise they'll never learn.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:30 AM
-1

If one or both fail or are sabotaged, then she also has the option of getting an abortion for herself, relinquishing her responsibility, as well as 'giving up' her body for nine months + childbirth. Sure, it's her decision. But that also has a huge impact on the body. Some women suffer infection from an abortion that will leave them permanently infertile. It could affect the rest of her life far more than you even realise. Abortion isn't something that is taken willy-nilly by most women. Guys li…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:24 AM
-2

Really? So you're saying that men give up their bodies for 9 months and endure the ordeal of childbirth? - A procedure which is still potentially lifethreatening for women. What a silly man you are.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 03:49 PM
1

My first sexual partner was a woman, so that's obviously my natural inclination. So, fuck you. I have nothing more to say to you, so don't waste your time.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:05 PM
1

You think that sex is aggressive? Straw man. "Cannon cumming" on people is, however. I mean, what are you? - A dirty dog marking your territory?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:04 PM
1

You denied saying "any such thing" Liar. Read again, and kiss my arse. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3g76zt/feminism_is_not_the_belief_in_womens_equality/ctw6m1a
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:04 PM
1

And I also said people need to treat each other better, in another comment. I see you like cherry picking.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:38 PM
0

It wasn't always illegal though. That's my point!
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:36 PM
1

Being gay isn't always genetic. Sometimes it's environmental. Do your homework, troll.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:35 PM
1

You're a very aggressive person. Says the moderator of a group called 'cum cannon addicts'... Lol. Projecting much? I'm sure you're finding Lesbianism fulfilling. Oh, I will, Sunny Jim. Men have no idea what they're doing in bed.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:33 PM
0

Holy shit, did you just come in and blame male suicide on the fact that men aren't embracing you Nope. I didn't. That's your Strawman. after you "chose" to become a lesbian, something I'm sure actual lesbians appreciate and wouldn't find remotely insulting? Why would they find it insulting? Why does any woman become a lesbian? If I didn't find women attractive, I wouldn't be one! You are not entitled to a relationship Actually, we're all entitled to a relationship. We're all entitled to chose to…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 01:55 AM
0

Men no longer see incentives in relationships when hookup culture has taken over from dating. And people wonder why suicide is on the increase. Sure, failed marriages screw men up, but so does being lonely. Who is genuinely happy fucking around, catching all sorts of diseases? Especially when one of the women find out they've caught something from them, and seek vengeance. There are a lot of vengeful women out there, no doubt driven by men's misdemeanours. Women aren't entitled to relationships …
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:06 AM
0

The incentives for relationships have all-but been removed for men, and then we turn around and blame men. Have they? What about close and meaningful friendships and companionship? Relationships should be about so much more than just sex. Just can't get mad when someone who saved theirs for a midnight snack eats it. Actually, yes, we can. It means they're emotionally cold. I don't know about you, but I have no place for such people in my life. Relationships should have depth.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:36 PM
0

you place the onus for ethical sex on the shoulders of the men. Yet another Strawman! I said no such thing, and you know it. Read here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3g76zt/feminism_is_not_the_belief_in_womens_equality/ctw6m1a?context=3 I said people need to start treating each other better. That means both genders. All I initially said was that it is no wonder that women become feminists when men treat them badly. But, that does not mean that women don't treat men badly.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:33 PM
-1

And there it is: women aren't equals in that decision. Strawman, mate. I never said that women weren't equal. These days, they are. They're oppressed by the lies of men. Oppressed, no. Lies, yes.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 09:12 PM
-1

And men didn't have sexual liberation in the 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th (etc.) centuries?! Come off it. Look how many men died of syphillis from sleeping with prostitutes. It has nothing to do with feminism. It was considered normal for men to "baptise" themselves in brothels. If that isn't sexual liberation, I don't know what is! And it still goes on to this very day, yet, ironically, people are less open-minded to men getting his dick wet in brothels today, than they were two centuries ago. And to…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 08:12 PM
-1

Which is why men need to stop treating women like shit if they want to tackle the feminist movement. Women will stop becoming feminists when men stop treating them like fuck buddies, before tossing them aside when they're bored. And yes, women are guilty of doing the same to men. People need to start treating each other better, period.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 07:49 PM
2

My theory is that men hurt them in some way. The inferiority they feel has nothing to do with their education in Women's Studies, but more a lack of self worth in general. Men rejecting them could also make them feel that way. There are plenty of women with self-esteem issues who are not feminists, but plenty of feminists who hate men. And although I'm not a feminist, having been treated badly by a certain male, I can understand where their hatred of men came from. That's not to say I hate men (…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 12:42 PM
0

Oh, go away. Hand in the cookie jar doesn't mean cheating! I have nothing more to say to you, troll. Stop wasting our time.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:27 PM
1

I just have surrounded myself with quite a few people who have never even once been unreliable. You're lucky you can find reliable people! I seem to be surrounded by tossers. And, certainly, I have the shittiest taste in men.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:21 AM
1

If you're hatred of humanity swings both ways then that's fine. I didn't say I hated people. Strawman, mate. Hate is a strong word. I'm disillusioned by humanity. You must live in a pretty shitty world though :| Not a shitty world. I just deal with shitty people. /u/AloysiusC is one of them.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:45 AM
2

Sweetie, the majority of women lie too. Since when has having faith in humanity in general, been a prerequisite for being an MRA? If that were the case, this subreddit would be bloody empty!
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:27 PM
-1

Are you always this stupid, or is today a special occasion?
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:49 PM
-1

Lol. I'm an MRA supporter, mate. Try again.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:41 PM
-2

Cartoon? What cartoon? Well, he would be less toxic if he wasn't who he is. That's the truth. Personally, I'd prefer him to just learn to be honest, and to stop being a closed up, emotionally void, dickhead. But, there's no hope for some people, it seems. Just like you couldn't stop your wife being abusive because she didn't want to stop, that little cretin can't seem to learn the art of honesty. A leopard doesn't change its spots. He is a bicycle Wow. You're psychic!
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:02 PM
3

You can't make the other person change. Please go to a shelter, tell a woman opting out of abusive marriage, that it is her fault she can't change her husband's violent nature, and both of them are just stupid. Ok, I get it now. Well, I apologise for that. Add abuse to the list. Sorry you had to go through that. Not all women are abusive, however.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 02:42 PM
0

Not everything revolves around cheating, I didn't and my ex didn't. Oh, because I'm a man, I must have? Strawman. I never said you cheated. Funny you should mention that if you didn't, though... Any breakup that is to do with anything other than lying, cheating, or meeting someone else, is down to a stupid reason that could have been resolved had either partner wanted to. ALL relationships need work. I have no patience for people who throw their friends and partners away. Alas, we live in a worl…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 02:32 PM
1

Nope, I've never had the pleasure of cooking for kids. I can imagine it wouldn't cost that much if you buy quality food in bulk vs eating out. That wasn't the issue I was raising. The issue I was raising was your resentment towards women and needing a woman to have kids in the first place (which, by the way, you don't. Adopt or pay a surrogate mum). And I agree with regards the cost of skin care products, which is why women should pay for their own luxuries if they want them. It shouldn't be fun…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 02:15 PM
1

You have no idea how silly a 3 year old looks with genital herpes sores on the face where mom kissed him. Exactly! I wish more people thought of that before fucking around and then passing their nasty diseases onto their poor kids.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:09 PM
1

Actually, cuckold fetishists are proud they can control their wives. In most cases, it seems like wives are initially-reluctant but persuaded to do it to satisfy their husband's kinky fantasies. Lol. Then they are weak women. Nothing is better than controlling him back by stringing him along, making him think we'll do it one day in the future, just to please him, but then never deliver. ;)
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:07 PM
-2

It's far easier to provide for 5 kids than to provide for a girlfriend. Unfortunately, kids come from women. Ah, now I see. You're just a bitter, twisted, resentful git. One woman hurt your little baby feelings when she caught you with your hand in the cookie jar, and so you fail to see the bigger picture, failing to realise that not all women are like her. You're a dickhead, mate. Wake up.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:43 AM
1

Sorry, we live in a different world. Men I'm close to, do not cheat. Women I know well also do not cheat. Then you're lucky. Good for you. Just because you don't see it happening, doesn't mean that it doesn't. Maybe my circle of friends are outdated misogynistic sexist people. False equivalence. How can not cheating on someone equate to misogyny/sexism? You're an idiot, mate. Did I say it is okay to lie? The fact you were making excuses for the so-called "frustrated boy", suggests that you were.…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:27 AM
-2

MGTOW is happening. Good. I never said it shouldn't, so don't throw your cheap strawmans at me, arsehole. Try and keep up. Right back at you. Keep deluding yourself men need women. Projecting much? Lol! And you think women need men? Keep deluding yourself too. I am aware that men need women just as much as we need men, and vice versa. We don't, unless we wish to reproduce. And these days, we have sperm donors, just like men have surrogates, and likewise we can adopt. And I certainly don't need a…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:21 AM
-2

The worst guys had me keep a secret is buying stuff their wives won't approve of, with their own money. Or so you think. They're just less open with you with regards their affairs with women. They dare not tell anyone, because it would mean losing everything if that secret got out. Women are less likely to lose everything if they cheat. Both sexes cheat. Face the truth. And as for overbearing mom - frustrated boy relationship. I don't have that. I'm saying you do. And how would you know that if …
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:58 AM
-4

So how can one be masculine and not toxic? I'll rephrase. By not being you. Remember that when you're a sad, old, bald man, playing computer games in the future, wondering why nobody sticks around... http://youtu.be/MT0-OL_71yU
/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:28 AM
-7

I was talking about when there is a system that rewards lying, how often is it abused by women? Lol. It obviously rewards men too, since they also lie! It's not only women! because my friends just fade away. Have you had a personality check lately? Take a long, hard, look at yourself, and think again why your friends have all faded away. Because YOU drove them all away. Maybe you think men are seldom honest because you like to act like bossy mom among submissive men who are constantly in fear of…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:28 AM
-9

Of course, women lie too. But as far as I see it, those things are aspects of both toxic masculinity and toxic femininity. As for opting out of marriage to avoid the family court, it works both ways, mate. Not all women want to get married because it means the mother having more rights over their child by remaining unmarried. She can take the child away from the unmarried father and move abroad if they seperate. He'd have no say in the matter. Men have no power.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:54 PM
-8

So how can one be masculine and not toxic? By keeping his pee-pee in his goddamn pants, arsehole. Also being honest. Men seldom are.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:28 PM
2

Some are violent too. Some hit their children and scream at them when they're naughty. Not the way to deal with kids! Also, mothers seem to hit their kids far more often than fathers do.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:13 AM
1

the other mods have finally yanked your choke chain, little doggy. If I believed in psychics, I'd think you were one! Amazing how well you have this little dip shit sussed out!
/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:14 PM
7

A female bus driver lied about being gang raped so she could get her hours at work switched. Women wanted "equality", and when they get the same working hours, they don't like it.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:46 PM
1

And probably a lot of guys' mothers...
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:36 PM
2

You made a claim, you were corrected, and instead of admitting you're wrong, you condescended to me I'm so glad I'm not the only one this happens to. He'll never admit to being wrong. He thinks that fooling himself that he's right, and condescending others, will make up for all his flaws. What he's too stupid to realise is that it makes him even more flawed!! And the more you call him out on it, the more red herrings and lies he throws. Don't waste your time on him like I did. Laugh at him, and …
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:24 PM
2

Lots of people do! Being a mod has gone to his narcissistic little pea-brain. He tries to compensate for his lack of power by being an arsehole, a liar, and silencing others on Reddit. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:03 PM
2

Couldn't agree more with you, mate. I've decided I like you! ;)
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:16 AM
2

Thank you. I should have used this to ensure they don't get more clicks.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:10 AM
1

A good CEO could be delegating 80% of their work and just meet the big clients playing golf. Doesn't sound like something worth 20 million a years. That's when they've fully established themselves, the company has taken off, and they have a supportive team. Prior to that, most had to work goddamn hard to get there - years of working hard at school to get into a top university, years of hard work there to achieve top grades, 100 hour working weeks during their internships, living on Ritalin, amph…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:06 AM
1

Sure, if I was part of the "there is never enough" crowd. More money than you could ever spend in a life? Not enough! Need more! If you worked as hard as a CEO, you wouldn't be saying that. They've given up most of their lives for work, so I think after all that lack of sleep and hard mental graft, they're entitled to some enjoyment. I'm sure you'd feel that way too if you weren't wasting your day trolling Reddit and scrounging benefits, instead of working your arse off to run a company. Trust m…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 10:40 PM
1

They weren't. They were upper-middle class women fighting for the rights of upper-class women. Sod the working classes. Plus they used to hand men a white feather to shame them for not enlisting to fight in the war.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:49 AM
3

almost three quarters of men believed that politicians and the government had little interest in the problems they faced as men. I can believe this. In Ireland especially, where there is still the cliché left over from old times about Irish men being chauvinistic drunks who love a pub brawl.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:48 PM
0

Women desire studs far more than men desire sluts. Wrong! They're seen as potentially disease ridden, or likely to cheat/run off. The only women who would have an interest in a "stud" is his female equivalent - a slut.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:41 PM
1

In my experience, unattractive men seem to be more promiscuous. Same with unattractive women. I've concluded that they sleep around more often to try and boost their self-esteem. Ultimately, it doesn't work. They just get viewed as sluts, and fewer potential partners will want them.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:39 PM
1

What planet are you living on?! Even women who get smears can still get it. Sometimes the results are incorrect, and sometimes within 3 years between tests, the cancer could have already started to appear. Also, have you never heard of HPV related throat cancer or HPV related anal and penile cancer? No pap for those, sweetie.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 07:30 AM
0

Yes, except there's no reliable STD test for HPV! You don't know you've got it until you develop pre-cancerous cells! Also, with regards HIV, a person can catch HIV the day before the test, and still test negative (because antibodies haven't been formed yet), and pass it on.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:25 PM
1

I have to agree with you on this. I can see many guys being tossed aside and dying alone for both their desire not to commit, and not have children.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:36 AM
3

Exactly!
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:13 AM
4

Maybe a poster should be made on how to stop a woman hitting her husband when she's 30.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:12 AM
-2

This is why they frown upon prostitution, and escorts because women are not able to lock down a provider for the rest of his life. No, it's because they are terrified of catching a disease from men, which they caught from all the prostitutes and escorts.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:04 AM
1

It's been proven for some time now that "peer reviewed" means doodley squat.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 10:40 PM
1

I should point out that the absence of academic literature in no way indicates a lack of validity. Lol. If I came up with that excuse in a dissertation or thesis, I doubt any university would buy it!
/r/MensRights31/01/15 11:09 PM
1

Not as much as a guy who did the same. Trust me.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:38 PM
1

Only far worse. Men get judged much harsher for doing the same. He'd be deemed a "loser".
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:30 PM
1

Very witty. Fair play.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:34 AM
1

My point is that men are not the only stalkers, which is what feminists like to assert.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:59 AM
1

Nope I don't believe that at all actually.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:11 AM
1

Aww, it's so cute when you try to talk about things you don't understand.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:01 AM
1

Wrong, troll. Do your homework. http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/100/Supplement_1/490S
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:54 AM
1

I never said that correlation is causation. Stop throwing the same strawman argument. And there is not "zero evidence" that eating fat causes heart disease. There is some evidence to suggest a causal link. And read the study I presented to you regarding vegetarians living longer.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:42 AM
1

What the bloody hell has marriage got to do with anything? Statistics suggest that married people live longer, but that has nothing to do with vegetarianism. And statistics also suggest that vegetarians live longer. This is what you are latching onto. You're presenting a red herring, mate. You said that vegetarians are more likely to be married. Marriage and vegetarianism isn't in any way related, as I mentioned before, and which you appear to not understood/not read properly. So I will repeat: …
/r/MensRights18/01/15 03:12 PM
1

Vegetarians are more likely to ... be married What the bloody hell has marriage got to do with anything? Statistics suggest that married people live longer, but that has nothing to do with vegetarianism. Plus, most vegetarians are not married. Most are very liberal, politically left-wing people, who don't favour marriage in the way that Conservatives do. And on that note, [Conservatives are more likely to be meat eaters] (https://kar.kent.ac.uk/41689/1/Dhont&Hodson%202014%20PAID.pdf) because the…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 10:58 PM
1

Nevertheless, vegetarians still live longer in general. So answer that one. And even if there is no correlation between dietety fat and heart disease, there are significant links to meat consumption and cancer risk. And besides that, animals have emotions and thoughts, just like humans. It's cruel to put them through slaughter. Watch the videos I posted above. You wouldn't put a baby through that, so why put an animal that has an IQ higher than a 3 year old, through that shit?!
/r/MensRights17/01/15 03:50 AM
1

No, the article does not offer that misogyny is overplayed. I suggest that the feminist cries of misogyny is overplayed in general.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:05 PM
1

They don't dominate men to the point of submission. They want men to be equal to them, but not beneath them, and not higher than them unless it's their husband and it benefits them financially or sexually.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:25 PM
1

Why only under Al Qaeda? And how would I know? Nobody knows unless they personally know the women who live with Al Qaeda fighters.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:23 PM
0

Women don't have testosterone Oh my god, what a moron! Read up on endocrinology. Besides, high oestrogen is scientifically proven to cause aggressiveness more than testosterone. http://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/6576
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:33 PM
1

Not all Muslims are Al Qaeda, moron!
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:22 PM
1

You don't get it. Most women don't want men to be submissive, even when the men do want to be submissive. Feminists aren't dominant personalities. They're whinging babies. When push comes to shove, they need men to do the hard work. They just want to have their cake and eat it, whenever they feel like it. They don't want to pass over the role of house wife to men, and as long as women don't want men taking over women's "traditional roles", then men won't, otherwise just about every women (except…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:13 PM
1

Well your response is all speculative. Opinion isn't fact. I'd rather stick with the statistics, and how I feel on a vegetarian diet vs eating meat, thanks.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:10 PM
1

Flip the genders? So you're asking would men be privileged in a world were they were women's slaves? Who could be executed for disobeying women, had no right to vote, own property, or even drive. I recommend you watch this video by /u/girlwriteswhat on 'When Female Privilege Backfires'. It may seem like women have no rights, but actually they are being protected in a way that men have no rights to. Islamic men have to earn the bread all by themselves, and they have to support the family all by t…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:46 AM
1

Ok, so if terrorists said "we don't kill men, only women", you're saying that those men aren't privileged; they're just patronised? Flip the genders, and think again.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:33 PM
3

Exactly. That figure is shocking. And that's only Birmingham Hospital, without the figures from elsewhere in the UK, and the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:30 PM
3

You're right. It is a form of control. It's an attempt to suppress sexuality on "religious or cultural grounds". Jews and Muslims even admit to that reason. But that does not make it ok! Leave the children decide for themselves when they're older.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:24 PM
1

I didn't say it was misogyny. You're correct: it's female privilege. I was quoting what feminists argue in general, to highlight the point of how ridiculous the feminist "misogyny" argument really is, and how ridiculous they are being not to see their gender as a privilege.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:08 PM
1

Check your facts! http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324423904578523190441042514 http://time.com/9463/7-reasons-vegetarians-live-longer/
/r/MensRights15/01/15 12:04 PM
13

Exactly. I know plenty of women who interrupt men and also each other!
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:55 AM
2

Meat really is murder, actually. I challenge you to watch this Followed by this As I stated below, for humans to eat meat is about as "okay" as abusing and eating a dead baby. A human's teeth are most similar to a frugivore, and not an omnivore.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:49 AM
1

recommend any vegan spend a year surviving in the wilderness alone. There are different types of vegans. Some are dietary vegans, others are environmental vegans.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:45 AM
1

I'm a vegetarian myself, and I fully support animal rights, but to turn it into the fanaticism that some do, is insane. What I've also noticed with vegans, in particular, is that many of them are feminists who link animal abuse with violence against women, and use veganism to "prove their point" about "male aggression". Although I support animal rights, it's a sad fact that many vegans are cranks.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:42 AM
1

animals are lesser than us and that they taste good, so it's okay to eat them. Oh really? Then watch this. And then this. As you can see, meat is about as "okay" as abusing and eating a dead baby.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:36 AM
1

Islamic fundamentalists are either playing that angle, or they truly believe that women are not responsible for their choices. Interesting point. I hadn't thought of it that way.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:29 AM
2

You can still donate even if you're not British. If they get enough worldwide support, a similar movement might spring up in America.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 02:23 AM
1

I'm sorry to hear about your circumstances. A father is just as important as a mother, so long as there is one. I'm not resistant against father's rights at all. As I said earlier, a child born to a lesbian or gay couple can thrive and are often happier because they know they were definitely planned, and are loved and wanted. Same goes for those conceived by a mother who used a sperm donor - the child will know they were planned and wanted very much. It's different in cases where a father leaves…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:41 PM
0

but we don't want to make social policies based on outlier populations. Who said anything about social policies? I'm talking about further research, or considering variables when making comparisons about fatherless children. People are too quick to conclude that fatherless children grow up to be "aggressive" or "damaged" in some way, without considering variables such as lesbian parents or single parents with a child born with a sperm donor. In those cases, the child was very much planned and wa…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:14 PM
0

That's just science, too bad you can't understand that. Too bad you haven't the critical thinking skills to realise that humans are not mice. Children have the intelligence to understand why their father isn't present when their mother explains to them. The way in which their mother brings them up as a single parent also has a huge impact upon their behaviour. I doubt mother mouse can squeak a reason to baby mouse as to why daddy mouse isn't there. Plonker.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:10 PM
0

Hmm, have I touched a nerve? Sounds like you have issues, mate. Abandoned your own kids recently?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:08 PM
1

Men and women. There are women who make false accusations or sexually assault men, and there are some men who sexually assault women and men. It makes sense for everyone to arm themselves with cameras, these days.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:11 AM
0

and it's not really relevant when we are talking about the importance of two-parent families in general. Why not? And why does no MRA like to consider cases where the father chooses to run off and be absent? That can mess a child up just as much (if not more) as the mother refusing a child access to their father.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:00 AM
2

Sorry, I should have added the word father. The only reason I didn't was because the subject of the OP's post happened to be in the context of an absent father.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:11 PM
0

I know it doesn't address that. Tell /u/Rex9 the same, above! I'm applying it to humans, as did he, as there is a similar argument about changes in children raised by only a mother. Incidentally, I don't believe it matters whether the single parent is a mother or a father, as long as the child doesn't feel they've been abandoned by the absent parent.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 10:41 PM
3

"It’s an emotional, hormonal urge in all fertile women, which is not governed by common sense.” They don't need common sense to go to a sperm bank, which is what a single woman with an ounce of decency would do.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:41 PM
2

This is disgusting, although there are no sources listed that suggest evidence that the numbers are soaring. Being a single woman with nobody to have children with in the future (should I want them), I can sort of understand their motives to a point, but to trap men in a pregnancy they hadn't planned/consented to, or to have a one night stand and risk catching a disease, is sickening. If they want a child that badly, go to a sperm bank, and use a sperm donor. At least the donor gave his consent …
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:36 PM
-2

I argue that it depends in how much attention that child gets from the mother. There are cases where the fathers die when the mother is pregnant, or the mother uses an anonymous sperm donor, and the child grows up to be fine. I think there's a world of difference between a dad who is absent because the child knows the father doesn't want him/her (or because the mother lies about the father being a bad egg), and a father who isn't present because he died, or was an anonymous donor at a sperm bank…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:28 PM
12

This only goes to show that all police should all be equipped with lapel cameras - for their own safety, as well as the public's (in the few cases where members of the public are assaulted/wrongly arrested by police for being black, etc.).
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:11 PM
12

There are non-feminist women who would do the same. We have no idea if they're feminists.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:09 PM
0

Women are the majority of the electorate - not by a large margin, but not by a negligible margin either. Simple demographics research confirms this to be true Sources? Otherwise it's all mere speculation.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 06:59 PM
0

Not offended at all. I just think its moronic to change the meaning, or not except that your verbal reasoning skills are piss-poor.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:56 AM
0

Look where I've highlighted, and stop trying to back paddle. Either your verbal reasoning is pants, or you're lying now.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 11:58 PM
1

Let's recap on what you said: Just as you do not want women generalizing men, men should not be generalizing women. Liar.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 08:58 PM
1

Hmm, strange that she gets death threats. I'm a woman on Twitter, and have argued with many a feminist troll, but I've never received a death threat in all the time I've argued with them. Sounds like Janet is the "buttercup".
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:23 PM
1

Apparently it feels good to think of women as helpless damsels. Because most women, by nature, are more submissive. Men, by nature, are the protectors. That's why people automatically keep reverting back to the idea of "damsels in distress". I don't suppose being brought up on Fairytales, with princes saving damsels, helps.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:20 PM
0

I would have thought most women want to marry because they love the guy, want to spend the rest of their life with him, societal pressure to conform, and (if they are together a long time without him proposing) to validate doubts that he might not love her (or that there's something stopping him). Yes, those reasons too. Very much so, in fact. But it's also a fear of most women that the guy will bolt out the door as she ages. Marriage makes women feel safer.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:11 PM
1

I'm not a guy, doll. I'm a chick.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:08 PM
2

Redditor didn't tell me that. Nor did it prevent the double posting.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 02:13 PM
4

Cameron would have been forced to step down from Parliament. He wouldn't be stupid enough to say it, which is a shame. Anything to get that moron out!
/r/MensRights02/01/15 02:12 PM
-1

Most women believe that, yes.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 02:07 PM
2

Not all women, mate. I'm a woman, and the OP. If I were hysterical, I wouldn't have sympathy for Men's Rights, nor would I be posting here.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 02:03 PM
1

Go where, pal?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:23 PM
1

No need to be so rude, ya twat.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 07:29 PM
1

Bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:27 AM
1

And remember that "research" was sponsored by the pharmaceutical companies who want us all to catch HIV to sell their antiretroviral drugs.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:27 AM
1

I guess a feminist troll like you wouldn't get it. Probably just normal, every day behaviour by your standards.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:14 PM
2

If it shortens your lifespan considerably (which it does for those who can't tolerate anti-retrovirals or are diagnosed late), then yes, it is a death sentence.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:28 AM
9

Don't forget to hand out the condoms as well. AIDS is still a death sentence.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:44 AM
0

You know I'm all against circumcision, but eyelids are more important for protecting the eyes than the foreskin is for protecting the penis. The eyes would be permanently dry and our eyesight damaged if we could not close our eyes to protect them from grit and wind, or a strike to the face.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:48 PM
1

And your point is?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:28 PM
0

Maybe she's just a BDSM Domme.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:27 PM
1

If a woman shaved her head, I think she'd probably get more attention than she'd like! Not necessarily advances, but certainly a hell of a lot of stares!
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:52 PM
1

Yes, we can all read that. The point is, she should have faced charges for fraud, too. But at least she was jailed for something!
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:48 PM
1

If I didn't think feminists exploiting women was ironic, I wouldn't have posted the article in the first place, dumbarse! So right back at you, you stupid fuck.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:51 PM
2

Why should gender matter? I deliberately made that gender neutral. Workers are workers, irrespective of whether they are male or female. Exploitation is exploitation.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 02:46 PM
1

I know you feel you must maintain the facade of stupidity to avoid total embarrassment, but I just can't help driving the point home one more time for my own entertainment Miaw! Looks like you've been taking tips from the insults I threw at you in our threads... Sweetie! ;)
/r/MensRights03/11/14 02:44 PM
1

Well said!
/r/MensRights03/11/14 02:41 PM
1

Not that I know of.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:13 AM
1

That's the first I've heard of that one! Maybe the very old ones, but not the ones over the past 10 years.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:10 AM
-3

That was YOUR twisted interpretation of my words, sorry to say. I can quite clearly see that she's in favour of men's rights, as also reported here: http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/men-emma-watson-has-a-message-for-you--x17vGREJBe
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:33 PM
6

My title quoted the title of the article. Read again.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:51 PM
-10

Let me guess, you're a feminist. Why else would you be having a pop at me? GTFO.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:50 PM
6

I didn't lie - I quoted the newspaper's title, you moron! Try reading. And if you have issues with the title, then write to The Independent to complain about their crap title.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:17 PM
-13

What are you banging on about? I meant to read the rest, but then deleted because (a) I posted it on the wrong comment, and (b) I clarified on what I was getting it. She said that she needed a father as much as a mother. So what exactly is your point, troll? As a female myself, why would I have any issues with Emma Watson? Also, why the screen shot? Are you a cop collecting evidence on everyone here? Saaaaaad!
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:11 PM
-46

The title is irrelevant. It's the article that's important.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:48 PM
-13

So, what's your point? The problem is that she associates inequality as being a feminist issue; not egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:46 PM
-3

Yes, and read below that. She's also mentions that she needed her dad as much as her mother.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:43 PM
4

How so?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:40 PM
2

Killing all people also creates equality. Only if the ones doing the killing kill themselves too.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:37 PM
0

If I were angry, I wouldn't be laughing at you, pet.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:39 AM
1

Just look at your latest comments if you want to see an example of retardedness. I need not scroll any further down.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:50 AM
1

I've never owned a credit card so I did not give it to myself You must think everyone else is as dumb as you! You don't need a credit card to give gold. Just a bank account or debit card. I presume that you're not so dumb that you keep all of your money under the mattress? why do you sound so eternally angry? Eternally angry? I didn't realise we'd spoken for that long. Ah, I remember, we haven't. You're mixing me up with all the others you make dumb comments to. Do you think it makes you sound m…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:47 AM
1

So, you'd find it humorous for a guy to go by the username of "womanhater"? I fail to see the humour.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 04:00 AM
1

Pot. Kettle. Black.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:56 AM
1

Did you learn that language at college?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:55 AM
1

I've actually been given gold in here Really? Wow. I know of someone else who was given gold, too. They gave it to themselves, just like you did (if you even had gold), you lying little shit. I'm at college Who the fuck cares?!
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:52 AM
1

Lol and your submission history reveals a stunning record of ... zero submissions to MR. Now go away. Oh my god, looking at feminists' profiles and history... You are such a perverted stalker. You typical rapist male! /s
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:44 AM
1

And your username is a perfect illustration of why you should have no presence in Academia.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:36 AM
-1

My god, I'm getting horny just looking at them.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:28 PM
2

Lesbians don't? Are you sure about that?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:30 PM
1

Nowt wrong with left wing. It's just the feminists that are the problem.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:43 AM
6

It's because larger women have a lower self-esteem, and just want to complain that men ogle at them, so that they can convince themselves and others that they are more attractive than they are.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:27 AM
1

And a bouncing scrotum is an expression of misogyny. :p
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:44 PM
6

Yes, I know. But a lot of women do that.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:42 PM
4

Thanks.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:41 PM
4

That's true of just about every woman on the planet, and yes you're right, as much as I hate to admit it.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 09:00 PM
1

I try to hide my bulges. Breast bulges are unsightly, especially when they bounce around.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:50 PM
1

Me too. ;)
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:48 PM
1

If she doesn't think it's the right thing, why is she doing it? She needs anger management.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:46 AM
1

Yet, when women get harassed on Twitter, the media make a big stink out of it, and the police make arrests. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23485610
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:47 AM
1

Learn to spell.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:39 AM
-3

I've suffered with it too, and that's how I know that triggers are what can bring it all flooding back to the point of feeling suicidal. Either way, he was in financial trouble, and had alimony to pay, whether or not it was the ultimate cause for tipping him over the edge. It was quite likely a build-up and a number of things that tipped him over. Either way, the alimony can't have helped!
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:35 PM
-3

It's not my agenda, moron. Like I said, I'm female. I have a vagina. I don't have to pay out alimony. Duh.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:29 PM
-3

So you're saying that depressives don't have triggers? You are a moron! All people who have suffered with depression can have a trigger that can make it return again. You clearly know nothing about depression, you piece of shit. GTFO!
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:28 PM
0

Maybe I took lessons from you.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:26 PM
-5

And you do?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:24 PM
0

Probably all those who have second and third accounts, and pretend to be someone else. Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:24 PM
-6

your presentation leaves a bad taste I my mouth. Maybe you need to brush your teeth more often.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:24 AM
-19

Yes, he had a chronic illness. He also was in and out of rehab like a jack in the box, so he was being treated. He also had financial problems right before his death which tipped him over the edge.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:22 AM
-1

It states that he was in financial trouble. Fact. Alimony was adding to that. Fact. Wake up!
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:19 AM
1

My own agenda? Sweetie, I'm a female. My "agenda" should therefore technically be for alimony, not against it. Instead, I am standing by men's rights. Go back to bed, dumbarse.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:16 AM
7

Nobody said that it was the only reason. Strawman argument, pal.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:14 AM
1

...I shouldn't be mad t you, though, for all I know you're 15 year old. Says the person who types like a 10 year old. Hypocrite.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:17 PM
-5

That's true. Women are much more underhand in their revenge. They also play "innocent", so that nobody has any idea what they're scheming. They also sit and wait for when you're not expecting it. A woman once said to me, "If I had a violent husband, I might not get him when he's awake, but my God, I'd make sure I'd get him when he's sleeping... With a frying pan across his face!"
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:45 PM
3

I'm a woman, and I can tell you from my own experience and all the women I know, that looks absolutely matter.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:55 AM
2

sometime in the middle of the night, he decided to have a second round, and flipped me over and put it in my butt. I remember saying "no, don't," and him pushing my face in the pillow and continuing until he finished. If you said "no" and he continued, then that is rape. Sorry to say. The problem is that the law doesn't really allow for different categories of rape. I believe that not all rape is the same, but one thing they have in common is that "no" means no. As for the second incident, if yo…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:20 PM
1

So am I.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:55 PM
-1

Don't feel bad. It just means I'm better at sex!
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:54 PM
-5

Actually, it's simply absurd to believe that lesbians think "damn, we need to get a (fake) dick involved!" Really? How so? why haven't you gotten on that shit? I have! ;) Love ramming a strap on up my sissy boy. Men are better at penetrative sex because we can feel what we're doing, a strap on doesn't have nerves. Keep telling yourself that if it boosts your ego, but I can inform you that a dildo can do far more! ;) I'm sure a fleshlight can do more than a real vag, too.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:22 AM
-2

Not everyone feels much from having their back end licked.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:18 AM
0

I think you'll find that most are.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:18 AM
-1

When lesbian couples have sex the oral sex etc is mutual/simultaneous whereas using a dildo is directly pleasurable for only one party most of the time. Unless they're doing a 69, oral is also only directly pleasurable for one party at a time. Duh! Giving dildo penetration and giving oral are both acts of giving from on person at a time.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:15 AM
-4

uh... maybe because there's an actual penis in the equation, and that's more satisfying than a piece of plastic? Uh... No. I think you'll find that dildos and dicks don't feel all that much different when they're the same size. But that "piece of plastic" you refer to can do so much more than any dick can! Try it. ;)
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:12 AM
-3

Not alway.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:08 AM
-5

I guess by your stupid ass logic masturbation is the fucking best then. Actually, yes. Masturbation wins hands down.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:07 AM
-3

It's not sexist. Men will be better at giving each other oral sex, and likewise with women. Until you've had oral sex with both, you'll never know.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:12 AM
1

Self inflicted restraint isn't misogyny though. It's women deciding what's important to them, like adults. Exactly. Tell Salon!
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:11 AM
-3

But they have strap ons, vibrators, and dildos. They feel just as good as the real thing, if not better!
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:30 AM
-2

Let's grant for the sake of argument it's just socially constructed. So what? Is it harming people? People enjoying something! To the battlements! But if it is socially constructed for women to not like oral sex with men because they believe it's "misogyny", then that is a problem; not the issue that they enjoy penetrative sex. Women should feel free to enjoy oral sex with men without being made to feel that there is a social constraint against them having oral sex with men. For the record, if t…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:25 AM
-6

My theory is that women just do oral sex better. Straight women wouldn't really know that. Women have the same anatomy, which means they know and understand the female anatomy better, and therefore, they know what other women want based upon their own experiences. They basically do to other women what they would want themselves. Men, not having a vagina, wouldn't have the same instinct.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:15 AM
3

What the hell are you rambling on about? That is one major red herring. The point is, she's babling on about why she became a feminist, and brings up the "inequality" of pay and sexual harrassment as her reasoning. She doesn't receive any more injustices than men do. Wake up!
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:41 PM
-2

Or because you're a feminist?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:38 PM
1

Rape is far more clear-cut an accusation than sluttiness. Exactly. Which is why you can't even begin to compare them. Thanks for reaffirming my point.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:07 PM
1

Incorrect, so-called 'decent' girls can like guys with promiscuous pasts since they may be ignorant of that background. Same goes for women. She can always tell him she's only had a couple of boyfriends, and he'll believe it. A vagina doesn't stretch that much before childbirth, and often tightens up again after a long period of not having sex. Furthermore, there are men who have a cuckold fetish, and would be attracted to promiscuous women.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:04 PM
1

He might not want to change schools, but no decent girl will want him when he's a bit older.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:23 PM
3

Sure, and women have a reasonable expectation to not be held to a sexist double standard about sex. What double standard? Men who sleep around are called "male sluts" these days. What century are you living in, mate?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:42 AM
-2

And if you don't like being falsely accused of rape, stop fucking and getting sucked by random women you meet in bars and parties, amirite? Oh wait, you don't like it when it's turned around? How the HELL can you even begin to compare the two?! Moron. Rape allegation = criminal offence. Calling someone a slut = defamatory, at the most.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:35 AM
1

Mine is 8 years old. Beat that!
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:31 AM
2

Under some US jurisdictions. But the crime consists of displaying a weapon to a person with the intention of threatening them with bodily harm from the said weapon, or of criminally threatening another, or otherwise putting them in fear of physical harm. Can you PROVE that's what the guy did? Can anyone prove that? It was a kitchen knife; not technically a "weapon". How do you know that the guy didn't just go to slice himself some water melon, and in the process of going to do so, just happened …
/r/MensRights19/07/14 12:02 PM
2

That is still not an excuse to have him arrested for domestic violence! What planet are you on? It's a knife in a watermelon. We all lose out temper sometimes, but that is not domestic violence until it is aimed directly at a person. What next? Getting arrested for punching a pillow?
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:02 AM
1

I brought up the Daily Mail, because guys love posting articles from there on r/Mensrights, yet I don't see you complaining about that. Go and troll elsewhere.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:00 AM
0

So the Daily Mail is better, right? Lies and false reporting, and all.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:09 AM
2

It's as harmful as religion. Which is why religion should have no place at schools. The KKK, harmful; the Church of England, not so much. That a faction if the group is dickish is not a reason to avoid the whole. Precisely. They are harmful. Teach about how harmful they are, but don't teach religion. Incidentally, the KKK is not about religion, you moron! Eating some things will kill you. Doesn't mean you shouldn't eat. Red herring. Eating has nothing to do with religion in this context.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:43 AM
2

sometimes feminism is harmless to men and positive for society. If we teach that in UK schools, why would you care? If it is sometimes harmless, then that would mean that it is sometimes harmful. If something is "sometimes harmful", then that alone is reason to avoid teaching it.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:40 PM
1

Quite a few people see children more like accessories, "mini-me"s, a purse dog that will learn to talk, something to show off, or something to make themselves look better, rather than human beings. Absolutely. And it places a lot of pressure on the child. I see so many trying to live their lives through their child. They really do become "mini-mes" - just look at how many parents have their child's face as their profile photo on Facebook. They don't really want a child; they just want a new vers…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:29 PM
1

Adoption for the win. Not only saving an existing life instead of gambling for a hypothetical one, but also doing your part for sustainable population growth. Go go adoption. Exactly. That's why I don't understand women who get so distraught if they find out they're infertile. There are plenty of beautiful children out there in need of a good home, especially little boys. Sure, I can totally understand wanting the flesh and blood of yourself and a partner one adores, but if people genuinely like…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:28 AM
2

If you're sure you ejaculated in your hand, it's unlikely that she's pregnant with your child. She might be pregnant, but if she is, it is most probably by some other guy. Or perhaps she is doing the same thing with a number of guys, just to get "abortion money" from them all. Either way, she sounds batshit crazy, and you need to contact a lawyer. She took the condom off without your consent, which arguably, vitiates your consent to sex (since your agreement to sex was with a condom; not without…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:01 AM
1

And women are not hardworking? What kind of outrageous comment is that? Nobody said that women aren't hard working. Like men, some are and some aren't. However, some women are under much less pressure to work hard if they "marry well". How often do you hear about a man "marrying up"? I never seem to hear of a wealthy woman marrying a poor man who doesn't work (only a casual fling), but it does occur the other way around if the woman is fortunate enough to be good looking.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:05 PM
-1

I don't think it's a case that all men are seen as paedophiles. It is more a case of people being over cautious of their kids. Unfortunately, there are some unpleasant people in the world, and one can never be too careful where young kids are concerned. I can understand it to a point, because I wouldn't leave a child of mine unaccompanied around strangers, whether they are women or men.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:46 PM
0

Women over 30 who are without children are also treated with suspicion these days, and that suspicion increases the older a childless woman gets. Maybe not as child abusers so much, but certainly people question if they hate kids, or can't have their own and, therefore, might abduct someone else's. I'm not disputing that men get discriminated the worst, but any childless person is judged. And I agree that even men with their own children are looked upon with suspicion if the children don't resem…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:34 PM
1

Why should men be banned just so women can feel less "isolated"? There are fewer female gamers because they are less interested in games. Banning males is not only sexist, but if there are fewer female gamers, I doubt that many people would take part in the tournament. Sounds a bit like an easy win. Fewer people playing = less competition.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:42 PM
1

She's been taking lessons from you. ;)
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:35 PM
1

It won't be you. :p
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:33 PM
1

In that case he should make a legal complaint against her. She put the condom on him and initiated sex without asking "Do you want sex?".
/r/MensRights05/07/14 11:36 AM
7

I have to say, I wouldn't be offended if I wasn't allowed in a children's park. I respect that children need to be kept safe, and there are some weird people out there. That said, a rule that prohibits adults without children from entering the park is potentially useless. There are parents, grandparents, aunts/uncles out there who are paedophiles, and they could always take their child/grandchild/nice/nephew to the park, and abduct another kid whilst there.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 11:26 AM
2

Just do not take my right to do what I feel is best and have my baby boy circumcised. So parents have the right to abuse children? Circumcision is abuse. Any non-life saving surgery is putting a child a unnecessary risk. Are you not aware of the risks of anaesthesia, at least? It is unfair to put any child through that.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:18 PM
2

Yup.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:31 PM
3

Let me start off by saying there is no need to be rude or hurtful. And you're not being hurtful towards the victims of botched circumcisions by saying you should have a right to multilate your baby boy? It's very simple uncircumcised boys have a higher chance of developing UTIs According to a flawed study with a low number of subjects. It was not a fair test. Oh by the way, do not talk to me about biology. I am a biology major. Than act like one, and engage brain! I would be a loving and caring …
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:28 PM
3

I can see there could possibly be an issue with the fact that the child can not choose for its self. I personally do not have an issue with that. How could anyone with an ounce of compassion not have a problem with that?! My god, you're fucked up. It's people like you who are the part of the problem in this world. Get out! Also on the pro circumcision side recent studies have found that circumcised men have up to a 15% less chance of developing prostate cancer. And if you really believe that, th…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:43 PM
1

Yes, which is a huge problem. However, it is not considered within the purview of normal operation the way it is with FGM. In fact, for many cultures that practice FGM the pain and discomfort is by design. You cannot argue this is the case with male circumcision... That is the most moronic thing I have ever read. GTFO!
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:24 AM
4

As long as you have it done by someone who knows what they are doing I don't see what is wrong with it. The issue that it is performed on someone who is unable to consent, is the issue. Can you not see that? Not all baby boys want to grow up to experience less sensation whilst having sex. Life is short enough as it is, without the ability to experience more pleasure being robbed of them without a choice.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:22 AM
3

It's not acceptable, and should not be tolerated; Circumcision needs to be put to an end once and for all. Well, at least you're admitting that much. I recognize boys experience great discomfort after a circumcision, but it is TEMPORARY unless the procedure was botched. That's the problem. It regularly is. With that said, comparing the lifelong pain of FGM (lifelong pain that circumcision patients do not have to experience more than a month after a successful and normal procedure) to temporary p…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:18 AM
10

Circumcision causes none of these things unless the procedure is botched severely. You are a moron. Talk to boys immediately after having a circumcision, and then come back here. In the meantime, get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:30 PM
6

FGM often causes pain with urination and other health effects that circumcision does not Ahem... http://www.senslip-europe.com/circumcision----disasters.html Inform yourself before coming out with false statements that make you look ignorant and stupid.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:27 PM
5

Exactly. When they're erect, they look pretty much the same.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:46 AM
4

Get out, you idiot.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:44 AM
6

Exactly.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:40 AM
1

Lol, I'm being downvoted for teasing you. ;)
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:18 AM
1

I'll down-vote you for that. :p
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:17 PM
1

Not that I'm against men wearing what they want I bet you are. I bet you'd snigger like hell if you saw a man walking around town wearing a frilly dress. Admit it. but few men's clothes come with moral judgments attached by everyone around you in the same way that women's clothes are. Right, so nobody would judge a man who wore garments like this? You're living with your head under the sand. Wake up!
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:09 PM
-2

That's told her, my little troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:02 PM
1

Kilt definition
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:33 PM
0

Kilts aren't skirts.... Yes, they are. They look like skirts and women wear them as skirts. They're great for women to perv at men, because they're traditionally worn without underwear... Just like chiffon petticoats. :D
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:52 PM
18

Women can be, and often are, just as violent. If these cases are anything to go by, then perhaps we should also #endmothersday... http://motherswhokillchildren.blogspot.co.uk/?m=1
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:02 PM
1

Try wearing a skirt as a man. They do in Scotland... :p
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:54 PM
1

The Daily Mail is actually really good That tells me a lot about you. It looks like they've got it correct here. How do you know? Because you read it in the Daily Mail? Have you actually read the court transcript to see if it bares any resemblance to the report? I'm just curious why she is not charged with unlawful sexual contact with a 16- or 17-year-old but instead felony rape. Articles don't say. Because it's the Daily Mail! What do you expect?!
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:11 AM
6

Pregnancy is an autonomous choice. Circumcision is forced upon boys against their consent. You can't even begin to compare the two! If you really believe that you can, then you're more of a fucktard than I thought.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:17 PM
1

It's a Daily Mail article. They seldom get the factual details right, especially legal details. I wouldn't sweat over it.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:13 PM
1

The sad thing is, because she's attractive, she'll probably become quite famous for her crime. I can just imagine all the "naughty teacher" porn style pin-up pics now... Can't see that ever happening with a male rapist.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:11 PM
0

Point is, look how easily a woman can divorce a man. It is not such a clean break when it's the other way around.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:30 AM
1

Funny how such articles on the topic of 'Misogyny Kills' fail to mention this from the Elliot Rodger case: 'He also said he despised men who had luck with women and said he would eliminate them, too.' The guy was a misanthropist; not only a misogynist.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:52 AM
4

Because murdering people at home totally doesn't mean that he sought to kill them. Murder is just an every day patriarchal hobby of men. All men have a stash of corpses buried under their floor boards, just like all women keep a stash of dildos and amputated cocks under their pillows... Incidentally, he didn't only kill men in his residence. He shot one of the 4 men at a deli.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:45 AM
8

Let's not turn this into a semantics argument. Then get your facts straight! Misogyny, according to the Oxford Dictionary, means 'A hatred of women'. You can't argue with the good ol' Oxford Dictionary, my lovely ducks.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:21 AM
2

He actually stayed in and killed men. Staying in is irrelevant. The point is, he killed men; not only women. Open your eyes!
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:17 AM
6

Also he tried to murder a bunch of women specifically because they didn't want a ride on his pogo stick. That's not a fact; that is merely a theory at the moment. Also, bear in mind that MEN were also killed. It was not only women, which rules out the feminists' theory that his motive was purely misogynistic.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:14 AM
1

And that is absolutely shocking. But cleaning up a miscarriage is not the same as leaving a person to die just for insulting a "poor, little woman".
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:54 PM
1

It might have less to do with feminism, but would a woman in a Western jail have been treated to I humanely for making a lewd gesture at a guard? Perhaps. But she'd probably not have been left for dead in the same way.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:39 PM
1

Someone said the exact statement in the headline, on Twitter just a couple of days ago.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:37 PM
3

Exactly. I'm a female, and the number of times I've walked into the Ladies' (and I use the term loosely!) toilet, and seen unflushed toilets mountain high with poo; used sanitary towels left on top of the sanitary bin lid, instead of inside the bin; urine on the floor and toilet seat; blood on the toilet seat, etc., is unbelievable. Plus the rotting fish smell of the sanitary bin... I start heaving just thinking about the stench!
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:36 PM
2

I know, but I thought the guys here might appreciate a little humour!
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:52 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:55 PM
4

That's the law (albeit an ass). It's nothing to do with gender inequality by the BBC.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:48 AM
1

This woman should be ashamed of herself.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:58 PM
5

And how else can children explore it unless they're having sex?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 06:33 PM
0

What has this question got to do with Men's Rights? Surely this is more a feminist issue?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:53 PM
1

How so you know that they are "facts" and not speculation? Do you have any data?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:50 PM
1

Perhaps that was just an excuse for changing her mind, albeit a nasty one.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:45 PM
1

How do you know that it was only to amuse her friends? I'd be interested to know more, if you wouldn't mind sharing your story?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:58 PM
1

Why? You have a secret crush on her, do you? ;)
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:56 PM
2

That's a bit of a generalisation. Would you want women staring at your arse all the time, fantasising about doing you with a strap-on?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 12:56 AM
1

Good point! Depo Provera is actually an oestrogen contraceptive injection for women (used by women who might forget to take the pill/mentally incapacitated female patients at risk of abuse.)
/r/MensRights21/10/13 08:38 PM
1

It's not sexual assault as a person doesn't directly touch the genitals. The correct charge would be battery, in cases where it is not consented to (See the case of Potts v NWRHA [1983]).
/r/MensRights21/10/13 08:33 PM
2

That, my dear, is a part of BDSM! Whilst you and I don't go around shitting on people, that is a big part of BDSM for very many. You clearly know nothing about sexuality, sexual fetishes, and therefore, nothing about porn. I pity you and your sad lack of a sex life.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:07 PM
2

Try looking at porn sites. You'll find that BDSM is very main stream, and very far from uncommon. If you're going to try and argue with me, at least get your facts straight, you idiot.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 10:29 PM
4

BDSM is one of the sex industry's standards, you fool!
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:11 AM
1

And why don't you grow up and troll elsewhere. This is /r/mensrights, which means the discussion is about mens' rights. If you don't have anything positive to say about the cause, then leave. Simple.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:09 AM
4

Like feminism, then.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:12 AM
5

it does not follow that a man participating in pornography is abetting misandry in the same way a woman participating is abetting misogyny. Read what I wrote again. If a woman participating in porn is abetting misogyny, then how can you claim that a man participating in a porno where he is being beaten up, walked on with high stiletto boots, shit on, and forced to drink urine by a dominatrix, is not also abetting misandry? Your attempt to "use her logic" is not logical. Wrong. You're not being l…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:02 AM
2

Her argument was not about BDSM porn. It was about mainstream pornography where there is a notable absence of the depiction violence towards or degradation of men. Her argument may not have specifically mentioned BDSM, but it is still an area of mainstream porn where people are humiliated and are subjected to violence, and it is therefore very relevant to the topic. The adult industry exploits and degrades males - both participants and consumers. But it does not depict or glorify it the way it d…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:57 AM
1

The same could be said for Femdom. So let's do a gender switch: Men are depicted as objects to satisfy female desires. Acts that are uncomfortable or painful for the male (ie. whipping, beating, burning, etc.) are depicted as desirable... By the way, have you not noticed how many women apparently love 'Fifty Shades of Gray'? It seems pretty apparent that a lot of women seem to find pain sexually exciting.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:45 AM
5

You're assuming a symmetry in her argument that simply isn't there. Really? So, you suggest that Femdom BDSM porn is not in any way symmetrical to sadomasochistic porn where women are playing the role of a sub? That would be the equivelant, and there is plenty of Femdom and gay BDSM porn out there. Femdom porn where a dominatrix is beating the hell out of a man wearing a dog's collar and leash, before raping him, does not make women any more violent towards males, so why would regular porn make …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:11 AM
3

It's fantastic that female on male rape is slowly being recognised. Nobody deserves this. As a woman, stories like this make me stop and think. For centuries it has been believed that a woman cannot rape a man, yet these days men are wanting more women to make the first move in relationships (Rightly so! - If women want to be equal to men, then why should men always be the initiator?). This story makes me realise the dilemma men face when initiating sex. As a dominant woman, I sometimes get over…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:12 PM
3

I usually agree with Erin Pizzey 100%, and I agree that women want choice. However, without the "marxism" single mothers wouldn't have the choice to be able to leave their children in nurseries funded by the state, and single mothers also wouldn't be able to afford to stay at home either, as the right wing would cut state support for single parents (remember that women are not the only single parents. Some dads are too). We can't blame the left for all of this. The right also promote feminism th…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 12:56 PM
18

Yup. That's why they behave like children throwing their toys out of the pram. Children throw tantrums when they don't get their own way. Feminists do the same. It's an act of desperation because they're not getting their own way.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:09 AM
2

I do find it interesting that feminists tend to be all the 'Plain Janes', though. I often wonder if it's because they're trying to get thir own back on men because they've been rejected/don't get many offers of dates. I certainly don't know of any pretty feminists. (I won't include the pretty blondes in FEMEN, because we know they're frauds).
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:56 AM
1

But being false doesn't make something sexist. Not necessarily, but in this context, yes it does. How so? If I need to explain how saying one gender is less intelligent than the other is sexist, then you must be exceptionally thick.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:04 AM
2

Most witnesses took Chui's side, with one woman telling him: 'Stand up, ditch this ugly girl, you deserve better.' And indeed, she really is ugly! - Both inside and out.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 12:23 AM
1

Birth control costs you $200 per year?! What?! Doesn't Obama Care cover that? Birth control is free in the UK. Incidentally, I see your point about women not benefitting from sex any more than men do. I think 80% of women don't really orgasm. Also, giving birth certainly isn't pleasant, and can even be life threatening.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:19 PM
1

Good point!
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:12 PM
-1

What's the difference other than that one is true and the other is probably not true. That is the dumbest thing I've read in a long time. What's the difference between the truth or a lie? Or is a lie the same as the truth for you? But being false doesn't make something sexist. Not necessarily, but in this context, yes it does.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:03 PM
2

This is literally one of the dumbest things I've ever read on Reddit. You're basically like she's fat and ugly, so OF COURSE no one would rape her, so she'd definitely have to make it up. Either you're intentionally creating a straw man argument, or you didn't understand what I wrote. I didn't say that nobody would rape her! - Read again. I said that she seems the sort of person who would make up something like that to seek attention and try and get back at men, because she's unattractive and pr…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 07:56 PM
2

Same in the UK. 4000 applications to every 200 London law school places. Then consider over 70 law schools in the UK, with approximately 100-200 graduates per year. Not enough jobs for all those graduates!
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:49 AM
11

She seems the absolute epitome of a rape "wolf cryer": An unattractive, obese woman, who probably feels bitter and unloved. Making a false rape threat would suddenly give her some attention, and make her feel more popular amongst other women. The other women would try to protect her and make her feel more loved and wanted. Plus she would be getting her own back on men, because they don't find her attractive.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:44 AM
1

Your projection is pathetic. Go and suck your dick.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:39 AM
3

It isn't only a hurdle to be accepted to the bar in the US. It is a hurdle in any of the common law jurisdictions that include the US, Australia, and NZ. In fact, character and fitness is also a prerequisite outside of the US, too. She would struggle to progress no matter where in the world she might try and flee to, in order to progress to the bar.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:38 AM
1

Lol! Sweetie, don't even try and project that on to me. You've made it blatently obvious that you are nothing but a liar.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 08:21 AM
-2

Saying that men are taller than women is hardly akin to saying that women are less intelligent, which is incredibly sexist. Or do you believe that if we reversed the genders and said that men are less intelligent than women, that isn't sexist? Saying that women are not as good at video game could also be regarded a sexist assumption, as it fails to consider the reasons why that may be true or not.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:22 AM
1

Bite it you smug little armchair intellectual. Your debate strategy is puerile and I won't tolerate any more of you. Have you ever considered anger management? Fuck you. I lost a friend to prison for 5 years because of that very legal interpretation. If that's true (which I find hard to believe as rape law in Pennsylvania is similar to other common law jurisdictions), then I'm sorry to hear that. Case name? - You should know the case that gave, or at least validated, the definition, as you claim…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:02 AM
3

Maybe MRAs should also photograph their pubic hair to highlight the issues men face (however that might help!). Something tells me that it won't be considered 'art' if it involves male genitalia, though.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:20 AM
1

Try this. It's mentioned here.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:01 AM
1

In Pennsylvania, contact is penetration. Their courts do not accept "I just touched her outer-vagina". They consider it penetration. Sources? Pennsylvania is a common law jurisdiction, so you'll need to name the cases that established the exact definition of penetration, if your argument is to be taken seriously and stand any credibility. Otherwise I can only assume you're a lying or misinformed troll. And while you're at it, learn how to learn new things. Ha! And while you're at it, go back to …
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:38 PM
1

Lol!!! Look at an anatomy book, dufus! Penetrating means penetrating the vagina, anus, or mouth. Last time I checked myself, the vagina was inside the hole. The labia are the outside lips of the vulva, you idiot.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:52 PM
6

If it makes you feel better, if a woman rapes a man in the UK, the punishment will still be the same. The offence would be 'assault by penetration', and yes, it carries the same maximum sentence as rape. However, forced envelopment would only be regarded a 'sexual assault' and carries a less severe sentence.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:14 AM
0

I think you're grossly exaggerating. Go and check on the legal definition in Pennsylvania. I'm 100% certain touching the labia is only considered a sexual (indecent) assault; not penetration!
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:06 AM
2

Yes, but women can be charged with 'assault by penetration' or 'sexual assault'. Assaulting a man with a dildo can carry a sentence as severe as a rape sentence (a maximum of life).
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:04 AM
1

Indeed. But the issue remains the same: propaganda against men.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:47 AM
1

The reaction to it is the relevant issue. The woman has a fan page, FFS!
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:44 AM
1

Even if it is untrue: THIS part of the story is relevant. Olga Zajac has a fan page on Facebook because of the story, and women around the world were celebrating and cheering because a man had been raped for 3 days! Reverse the roles, and would there be cheering then?
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:47 PM
1

That's a very good point. A number of feminis sites use 'obscene language' such as the "eff-word", etc., which some may consider unsuitable for minors. That said, T-mobile did also block a number of feminist Tumblr blogs.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:44 PM
4

This is a gross exaggeration. I have T-mobile pay as you go Internet, and the block is actually because it considers MRM sites an over-18s site. Once you enter your credit card details when prompted (to confirm your age), the block is lifted permenantly.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:10 AM
5

Also, where exactly are these "real feminists" who are fighting to end this? I don't think I've ever met one. Exactly. Feminists are doing so much to end this pressure in men to perform, that I didn't even know that men could fake an orgasm until I read about it recently. If more women knew about it, we might actually try harder and not make so many assumptions. Where are the feminists when it comes to educating women about such matters, eh?
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:18 AM
1

Straw man. I never said that there was a right to throw him in jail.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:55 PM
1

Do you know the nature of their relationship? Do you? I think the bigger issue is that he cheated on his wife as opposed to had sex with his step-daughter. In this instance, yes, only by virtue of the fact the step-daughter is close to his age.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:32 PM
1

Thank goodness someone sees it from my perspective. I really can't be bothered to argue. The charges were WRONG, but that doesn't mean that his behaviour wasn't immoral. He may very well have been close to his step-daughter's age, but nevertheless, he cheated. Period.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:31 PM
-5

Straw man. I never said that it was a crime.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:51 PM
7

True.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:50 PM
-34

Although he was in a relationship of trust, and was as good as the girl's father, the charge against him is extreme. Even if the sex was consensual, the step father had a moral duty to refuse having sex with his step-daughter, and I am horrified that he gave in to his boner. If this were a woman having sex with her step son, it would be equally as disgraceful. It is an abuse of trust, irrespective of gender. EDIT: I said the charge against him is extreme. That means I'm saying the charges were W…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:32 AM
1

Troll rage? Lol! Speak for yourself. That's right; run away like the little coward you are.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:00 PM
1

Wow! Love the tone of sheer desperation in your last message. I've sure met some dumb trolls in my time, but you really take the cake. It's pointless even making fun of you, because it would take you the rest of the day to figure it out. Incidentally, I've met people like you before: You're completely unable to take any criticism, no matter how constructive, despite the fact you seem to love dishing it out, even when you are completely wrong. I honestly don't know if you're a spoiled brat in den…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:48 AM
1

You're putting way too much effort into this. Says he who took two days to think up a fallacious response. Love it! You have to scratch your head so hard to try and understand, that you assume that I must be putting in a lot of effort. Sweetie, when one possesses intellect, one does not need to put in the same level of effort as you might need to/imagine. I can't even be bothered to read that much text. Liar. If you hadn't read the text, you wouldn't be attempting to address the points I made. Y…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:05 PM
1

Yup, I called you sweetie, and I'm assuming nothing.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:13 AM
1

So, you had the courage to come back to me. Bravo. It seems you're a man true to his word... I like that. ;) Except that you misrepresented a lot of what I said. Speak for yourself. I said, if you agree with me then I agree with you. Not, if you WILL agree with me then I will agree with you. Same difference. I still disagree with the original poster but not necessarily your points. You're digging yourself into a deeper hole. First you say you 'possibly agree', and now you claim not to. Contradic…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:57 PM
1

You don't seem to understand the situation: Do I not? My advice to you is this: Never assume. We are assuming... Oh, Christ...! it is true that men are inherently more violent. As I mentioned; never assume. I take that to its logical conclusion. Oh, do you? Lol. We'll soon see how "logical" that is. Read and learn. I say: If A is true, then B follows. You say: But A is not true or We must prove A. A does not need to be true in order for my statement to be true. Sweetheart, I know this is getting…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 08:54 PM
1

I'll skip to the only interesting part: I could play that game too, but that would mean skipping to your final full stop. Fortunately, some people are more mature than others. Yes but only if it can be shown that she was more violent through no fault of her own. The problem is proving it There have actually been very many cases, and there was a debate into it back in the 1980s. http://www.nytimes.com/1982/07/12/style/premenstrual-syndrome-a-complex-issue.html More here: https://www.google.co.uk/…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 02:42 AM
0

Yes, of course humans are a member of the animal kingdom. I was stating the contrary to contradict AloysiusC, and ruffle his feathers. He rose to the bait. ;) As it happens, we are a phylum Chordata (vertebrate), of which we are classed as mammalia. Humans are actually of primate order, and part of the Hominidae sub-family (apes that have no tail and can gather food with their hands.) Our tribe is Hominini; genus Homo, hence the title Homo Sapiens.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 02:19 AM
0

You brought that example up. I merely used it in the manner that it would be applied if it were an example. Let me remind you as to what the example was in relation to. The example was given as a reversed gender equivalent of your original claim: if it were true that men were biologically more prone to be violent, then that would ethically justify lower punishment than for women. Claiming men are naturally violent is essentially pronouncing them not responsible. The example, as I stated earlier,…
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:26 AM
-2

There are more ways to arrive at a truth than finding a study and citing it. Ah, I see. It was merely your attempt at an argumentum ad verecundiam, with an ipse dixit. Nice try. So why demand sources from me if you agree anyway? Because your point was weak without citation. Note that I was not the only person who requested it. Admit you were a bit of a dufus, and show some courage. you either dreamt it up, or you're just a lazy git Multiple choice huh? I pick the second. Thought as much. Had a l…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:06 PM
-5

I can't be bothered with the first one In other words, you made it up - right? and yes that means you can believe it's false. Sometimes one can make up a random fact, and by chance alone, there can actually be some truth to it. Therefore, I am not categorically ruling out your claim as being a possibility, but without citing its source, there is also a possibility that that it is a complete fantasy. Incidentally, I actually agree with your claim (see my responses below, which corroborate your ar…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:16 PM
1

Haha I've never seen someone so confronational after the other person says they probably agree with them. Because there is no such thing as "I probably agree". One either agrees, or they do not. I'm on my phone right now So am I. Long live smartphones! bit but I'll respond to you when I get back in a couple days. I think we've said all that needed to be said on the matter.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:37 PM
4

Alright if we're in agreement on that then I might agree with your other points. What is this? - The school playground? - "I'll only agree with you if you agree with me!" Saaaaaad. I haven't fully thought it out but I most likely agree with you. Tip of the day: Don't try and argue something until you have a definite stance on a matter, or you'll make yourself look like a fool. Though it might be a bit much to attribute all causes of violence to a weakness and not just most, unless you defined we…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:18 PM
5

Strawman. I didn't attempt to say that it did! That was not my point. I was merely addressing the flaw in your argument.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:49 PM
2

I think much of the problem stems from the philosophy we're taught as children, when big kids bully smaller kids. The bigger kids are taught to "pick on someone your own size", and the smaller kids are sometimes told to fight back, usually by a family member. Subconsciously we seem to think it ok to fight someone who is larger (which most men ate next to the average woman), and thus F-M violence is deemed more acceptable by society, and considered generally less harmful, because the perpetrator …
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:46 PM
12

You forgot to consider the effects of oestrogen on violent behaviour...
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:37 PM
7

Indeed. I'd like to see the true statistics.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:27 PM
6

They are using violence to remain in power, Not always. Sometimes violence is about gaining control, other times it is the result of a loss of control. Sometimes violence is the action of someone acting in self-defence, sometimes it is the result of mental illness, or substance abuse. Either way, it ultimately stems from psychological weakness, or a feeling of threat/fear of some sort. Fear can be rational or irrational, but feeling threatened/fearful is ultimately a moment of weakness (which we…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:58 PM
0

A very revealing fact is that with men, violence is inversely proportional to how powerful they are. In other words, the more helpless they are, the more violent they become. Please provide a source for this. Another aspect people conveniently forget is that, if it were true that men were biologically more prone to be violent, then that would ethically justify lower punishment than for women. That doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:20 AM
0

Isn't this what society already does with people who are suicidal; attempt to prevent the suicide? (though the strait jacket and being locked up are a bit harsh and excessive I think). My ideas aren't exactly that radical. They're pretty much in line with what society seems to already practice. Just because it is what 'society does', doesn't necessarily make it right. Society is just a herd of sheep following the opinion of someone else. Society deemed homosexuality illegal and immoral for years…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 08:28 AM
-5

I was going to add that people in vegetative states are the only people I would consider morally acceptable candidates for euthanasia Liar. You hadn't thought of PVS until it was mentioned in the link. If you had, you would have mentioned it before. but left it out to keep from getting into a deeper debate about euthanasia. Like hell you did. In the above case, the hospital is arguing that she should be kept alive. I guess it's their call, Just because it's their call, it doesn't mean their deci…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:26 AM
-5

Worse than death? No. I think everyone is better off having a second chance than being dead. Really? And you think this woman is having "a second chance"? Think of it this way: If this were a man - perhaps you, would you prefer to live like this, or would you rather have just died quickly?
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:58 AM
-4

Just like how being beaten to the point of becoming wheelchair-bound for the rest of one's life can be worse than murder. So, you believe that a boy who ends up with a colostomy bag for the rest of his life as a result of being brutally raped, sustains an injury that is in no way equally as bad, or perhaps even worse? Righty-ho, Jim! I guess we had better just start euthanizing all these people since clearly they would all be better off dead. That is one of the most pathetic strawmans I have eve…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:33 AM
5

Lara Croft attacks male characters, and all the baddies in the game are male. That could actually be interpreted as misandry... ;) Incidentally, to address the point in the article about violence against women, feminists would also complain if there were no fighting women/strong women in video games. Can't win.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:05 PM
-6

Saying rape is worse than murder and every other serious crime and trauma? Sometimes rape can be worse. Some murders might consist of a quick blow to the head. A violent rape (like that gang rape on a bus in India), can be the worst form of torture possible towards any person, regardless of whether the victim is male or female. Reports state that the woman's intestines and uterus were ruptured. She was not only raped and beaten with an iron rod, but one of the rapists reportedly inserted his who…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:52 PM
9

I'm a woman, and I get feminists asking me if I've "taken a knock to the head", or I get angry rants about how "some people [meaning me] refuse to accept the truth even if it slapped them in the mouth". All because I refuse to believe their bullshit. Got to laugh.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:42 AM
1

I'm currently being held sexual prisoner by a female trying to conceive and get married by extorting me. I've had no choice but to go bareback a few times or potentially suffer great consequences to my work visa. I thought I could bide my time, but now she could be knocked up so I'm out of here. Sorry to read about that. Sounds like you got stuck with an unfortunate partner. I'm honestly starting to think women just use and take advantage of men. Not all of us are bad. Next time you think that o…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 12:20 PM
3

True, but that is no reason for the woman to take advantage of him. He's just desperate and naive, I think. That said, in China, a woman who is unmarried after the age of 27 is considered a "leftover woman", and her chances of finding a Chinese man after 27 years old decrease dramatically. So maybe they're both desperate. Nevertheless, she's being dishonest with him.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 08:32 AM
6

They want the right to have everyone refer to them as "Female" even if they are biologically, genetically, and physically still a male. Funny you should say that, because that's not my experience with crossdressers. I think you're confusing them with transgendered and transsexual people. They are not crossdressers/transvestites. Different genders, dude.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:38 PM
3

Because being proud of being white and being proud of the accomplishments of the white race is not racist. You have been brainwashed by liberals to hate white people and to think that being proud of being white is racist. There is nothing wrong with being proud of one's colour, I admit. But to dedicate an entire group to it, is racism. Just like a female only group is sexist. Incidentally, the liberals have not 'brainwashed' me. The right have clearly brainwashed you, if your [blatent racial hat…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:08 PM
10

A large portion of the Reddit staff male moderators are homosexuals (not that there is anything wrong with that at all). There are a good many who are transsexual, crossdress etc. (again nothing wrong with that). They simply want to be accepted as females and they think the way to do that is by supporting SRS and feminism. What the hell has crossdressing got to do with feminism/anti-MRM? While crossdressers can be feminists, not all are. Same goes for homosexuals. Feminism does not support cross…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:06 PM
3

Wow, thanks for taking the time to write all of that. I really do find the topic fascinating, and it helps shed some light on human behaviour. It's also refreshing to read another female view point on the subject (and one that isn't biased). What I always find curious is how alpha females fit into this. Alpha females tend to prefer submissive or less masculine males (and vice versa), yet many of them don't really seem to get on in the end. There is ultimately always a competition for dominance, …
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:29 PM
0

Oh, I read a couple of sentences and thought you were being sarcastic. Aww, and there was me thinking you were just a bit slow on the uptake. Confirmed.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 02:13 PM
0

They said "jump" and you asked, "how high?" What a moronic strawman!
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:07 AM
1

Oh, grow up, and go and suck your dick. I did not say 'a second' in that instance. I said I regularly go back and change things a second after posting, not necessarily meaning that one. Nearly every comment I ever make has an asterisk, as I regularly notice typos a second, or even a few hours, after posting. Stop your whining, your cheap, slanderous ad hominems, and get a goddamn life, you moron. I'm not going to waste another letter on you. You're just a pathetic troll, with nothing of any valu…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:02 AM
3

However, I suspect concealed ovulation originated in women to facilitate cheating the tournament system in favor of monogamous consortships, rather than to cheat monogamous partners in favor of mating with the "alpha dog". Interesting theory. My theory is that it might have something to do with facilitating survival of the human species by allowing women to reproduce with the alpha men (those perceived to have the "strongest genes"), while the concealed conception allowed her to partner a man wh…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:40 AM
1

Hook, line, and sinker Not really. It would only be 'hook, line, and sinker' if I didn't question its reliability, which incidentally, I most certainly do. University education would have been utterly useless had it not been insisted that one should never believe everything one reads, and to sharply question everything. How do we know for certain the figure is 10% - It could be more, or less.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:21 AM
1

So, did you find the part of the article that says what "some populations" means yet? As I mentioned, if you read the article then you can put that statement into context. The quote I used in the OP (i.e. 'some populations') was a direct quote from the article, which was mentioned immediately after the paragraph about women in 'healthier' countries being attracted to less masculine men. Thus, 'some' would imply 'healthier women' in countries such as Belgium (also mentioned in the article).
/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:44 AM
2

How do you know that was the exact study used? Maybe it is just a similar one. That said, I do know that journalists commonly misquote studies, or misrepresent/embellish the data, to make a story sell better.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 03:27 AM
1

He has a right to complain. Nay. AN OBLIGATION. That's the only way people's attitudes will change and perhaps he can inspire some other guy to say "no" and go to HR. Hear, here. Men owe it to other men to speak up. If they continue to remain silent, then attitudes will never change.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:54 AM
5

It states which populations in the article, dude. (Those in countries where women choose less masculine men, and where women are in better health.)
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:31 PM
3

No matter how much you trust your SO, there is no reason to not protect yourself. Exactly, and that's why BOTH partners should also insist the other gets regular STI tests. If some women are spreading their legs elsewhere, then some men are quite likely to be "getting it on" elsewhere, too. Not to mention the possibility that men are just as likely to be the biological fathers of other womens' children outside of his marriage, too (but wives cannot enforce tests for that).
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:21 PM
3

You're probably right, but without sources the assumption is pure speculation.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:15 PM
1

What relevance is the time that I spotted the punctuation mistake? You're the liar, now grow up and stop throwing random ad hominems. It's obvious that you're doing it out of desperation after being made to look stupid. Perhaps you should consider anger management counselling.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:08 PM
0

So what?! I regularly post something and edit something a second after posting. What I edited on that were the inverted commas, not an extra word, and you know it. I've stopped dealing with you now, troll. You're boring me, and you have nothing of value to say. Goodbye. EDIT: I edited this an hour after posting, because I noticed I left a "d" off the word "and". Me bad.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:00 PM
0

Exactly. Which is why I said 'unless'. Try reading for a change, troll.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:57 PM
-1

Ha! Wishful thinking, mate! Now do us all a favour and just admit you misread, instead of spouting shit.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:54 PM
2

I know of plenty of cases where women stayed to look after their sick husbands. I also know of plenty of cases where the women walked out. There are both good and bad people everywhere.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:52 PM
1

No, not all. Some might, but others might only leave if he sits on his arse all day and doesn't try or bother to do any work. If it were me, it would be the latter, unless he were unwell (physically or mentally) and, thus, unable to work. Don't make hasty generalisations.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:38 PM
-1

Bull shit. I clearly stated the words 'look up', suggesting it was a theory that was to be looked up from a source; i.e. a book.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:35 PM
2

WhiteRights is a racist group. Why hasn't that been shut down?!
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:01 PM
0

All women like men with money. Even if they don't find it mandatory, they like it, and the difference in earning power will often determine how long the relationship lasts. True. But not all women insist upon it. Again I will be solipsistic and say I'd rather a poor man whom I love, to a wealthy man who I love less/don't really love other than his money. I'm a saver, not a spender, and I find bagging a bargain far more exciting than spending lavishly only to feel bored by the purchases later. Mo…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:40 PM
-1

Darwin wrote no book titled such It's a theory; not a book, you div! Go back to school. The level of right-wing type ignorance and stupidity with so many in this sub, truly beggars belief. you shouldn't tell people to read something you've never read yourself. You just revealed that you have absolutely no idea that the 'theory of evolution' is a theory, and ironically, you attempt to project your ignorance onto me! Nice try, arsehole. 'On the Origin of Species' is available in the biology sectio…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:35 PM
18

the admins have threatened to shut down the subreddit in the past, nuff said. It always fascinates me that /r/feminism isn't considered a hate group, but /r/mensrights is. Switch the genders around and /r/feminism would have been shut down long ago.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 07:32 AM
0

The more you deny it, the more powerful it is. I've sen it happen with people barely among their likes What a ridiculously fallacious argument. Were you never taught not to make hasty generalisations? Clearly not. Well, to play you at your own game: You must be a paedophile, and if you deny it, the more powerful your desire is for molesting minors.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 06:09 AM
0

Even if they have some emo hipster submissive BF, put him beside a fit Brad Pitt or Matt Damon and guess who they're going home with. Call me solipsistic if you like, but not every woman goes for that type. Neither Brad Pitt or Matt Damon is even remotely attractive to me. I never saw the appeal in either, especially Brad Pitt. Urgh!
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:27 AM
2

Many women apparently also believe having an expensive purse will keep other women away from their men Ah... Maybe that's why so many women buy knock offs from Ebay! ;)
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:22 AM
2

You have a point. I'm not fussed about having kids (although I haven't ruled the possibility out 100%), so maybe that's why. There was a study I read about once that found that less fertile women prefer more feminine men. That said, I'm not infertile, so maybe I'm just strange!
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:16 AM
1

This takes the piss... She complains about not wanting to see her baby go though pain, yet she puts him through it anyway! Sadist, much? The fact she's discussing her son's dick on Facebook, and seeking attention from it by playing the role of the poor, sorrowful mother, only goes to show what kind of woman she is.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:20 AM
2

Not sure why you were downvoted for that. I agree with you, so just upvoted. Circumcision is not the way to go about reducing HIV/AIDs; sex education and use of condoms is.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:54 AM
0

Fair enough. We all have our "type", and that's your "privilege" ;) (deliberate feminist quote just for laughs).
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:48 PM
0

How would I know what masculine men see in me? I'm not a mind reader. Yet, I've never been short of offers of dates from them. No doubt they are decent blokes, but sexually they are not my type. Sadly, we can't control our sexual preferences.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:43 PM
0

Attracted to whom? I'm attracted to "less masculine" men, for the record.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:37 PM
-1

It doesn't take Einstein to work that out, dude. Read up on Darwin's 'Theory of Evolution'.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:15 PM
1

We know that men find women with specific shapes sexier than others. Women care much more about behaviour. Ultimately even muscles are about behaviour (he worked out to get them, they're useful, other people especially men respect them, etc.) It's instinctive. Blame evolution and the concept that men are seen as the "providers" and "protectors". Shape is indirectly linked with behaviour: Not only will a muscular shape make most men appear more confident (a behaviour), but working out at the gym …
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:57 PM
3

We like to pretend women are this way because we don't like what it says about them. Exactly. Consider the sort of women who only like "masculine men". They tend to be the privileged princesses who want a "real man"/"hero" to look after them, because they're such frail, delicate little flowers that can't stand up for themselves, and also need someone who is able to do the DIY (a broken fingernail is an injury, y'know! /s). They also want someone to be able to buy them expensive presents to make …
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:46 PM
0

the person is not giving off naturally feminine/masculine energy, they are just copycatting preconceived notions of how you SHOULD behave And people don't do that? Plenty of people act more masculine/feminine to make themselves more attractive to others, and very many fall for the act, too.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:07 PM
-4

If you truly encounter deviations, you deal with them as they crop up. You don't cater to them. No, but if not all women are attracted to masculine men, and if a masculine man is attracted to one of those women, then that means that masculine men miss out, too.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:54 PM
-9

Masculine attributes will yield an optimal success rate. For the majority, perhaps. But that doesn't mean that all straight or bisexual women will find that attractive.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:29 PM
1

What a crock of shit. Not all women like the same thing. Major generalisation. Your assumption is akin to me saying "men only want one thing" and "men will bang anything in a skirt if they can't get anyone better, but only find busty blondes attractive".
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:19 PM
1

What you find though is usually the more attractive the women the more likely she is to choose men who fit this generalised idea of what is considered attractive. Or in other words, if she has more market value, she can afford to choose what she really wants. Its the same with men too, but we like to act like women are different. I agree with you for the most part, however, some women are different. I am considered attractive, but I have no sexual interest in masculine men. A little masculinity,…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:14 PM
0

Different women prefer different things. You get an upvote from me!
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:11 PM
1

Different codes of law. The anglican system is basically a reprisal and deterrence based law code that trys to do equal or more damage to the perpetrator that what he did. Anglican... Law code? Eh? Britain (and also the US/British Canadian/Australian/NZ legal systems - with the exception of Louisiana in the US) has a common law constitution; not a codified constitution. The term 'Anglican' is also irrelivant with regards Law, unless you're referring to the Anglican church! And where on earth did…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 08:55 PM
1

Interesting article. I think for every man who is unwilling to acknowledge his character flaws, there is a woman pathologically unable to take responsibility for her behavior. True. Although the effects of hormones on behaviour is definitely both overused as an excuse and given little understanding by others.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:45 PM
1

Well if you pumped a bunch of hormones into men I'm sure it would have strange effects too. I'm sure it would. Although I must confess that the pill never changed my taste in men when I was on it, nor when I came off it. I became more affectionate when I came off it, though. The pill, does make me more lethargic and cranky, and more recently made my legs heavy and swell up, which is a potentially dangerous side effect. The effects of hormones on a person is definitely not given much understandin…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:41 PM
3

Nothing wrong with having a good rant. I'm partial to a good rant, myself.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:29 PM
6

My aunt is particularly bad about it, I hate when people including her get the.idea that women are now somehow worth more than us and that we are nothing but means to an end to them. She outright left my uncle because he no longer "met her needs" and she was so empowered Women are not worth any more or any less than men, and vice versa. Women don't need men to "get off" anymore, and men can say exactly the same thing about women. If people cannot view the other gender as friends and equals, then…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:21 PM
2

As much as we may hate to admit it, there is only one possible conclusion: the movement must be drawing on a pre-existing constituency of people who genuinely feel dispossessed and downtrodden. And, in successfully doing so, it has accomplished something that Leftists have wanted for ages- motivating a genuine social movement among the well-off capitalist youth. Well, it doesn't take Einstein to realise that Men are being downtrodden. Although I support left-wing politics, I've been saying for w…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:53 PM
14

WTF?!!! I'm horrified! Seriously. That woman was lucky I wasn't there, because I'd surely have a few words to tell her. I'm appalled that others could find this funny. The boy looked scared as hell, bless him. Even if the police wouldn't regard this as sexual, this is still harassment and battery, and the boy should press charges. This looks as though it might have been in the UK, so bearing in mind the UK case of Faulkner v Talbot [1981] (an indecent assault on a 16yr old boy by a woman), unlaw…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 08:31 PM
4

I'm British and I'd never heard about circumcision until I was 18, when a friend was complaining that she didn't want to have sex with some guy she'd met on the internet, because he's Jewish and probably circumcised. I certainly didn't know what it looked like for some years later. It's not really a common practice in the UK (although probably more so now, as a result of an increase in immigration).
/r/MensRights09/09/13 08:18 PM
4

I was circumcised and my sex life is fine... How do you know? You'll never know unless you have a foreskin to experience it as nature intended.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 08:14 PM
1

Wow, what took her so long?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 08:08 PM
3

Don't forget the chastity cage. I'll be giving that instead of a wedding ring. Who said "romance is dead"? ;)
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:59 PM
3

The rally was in 1972, so it is unfair to compare this with modern day feminism. However, this is unbelievable: “The only way to win liberation is to make men miserable so they will have no peace until women are free. Married women invented man-hating,” she declared. Last time I checked, women were pretty free in the 70's. Admittedly, in the UK, at least, women were unable to have a mortgage in their name - only their husband's name. That caused major problems during episodes such as the Miner's…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:36 PM
-14

I'll consider it. Pity there isn't a course in overcoming immaturity, otherwise I'd send you a recommendation.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:05 PM
1

Just scrolling down the comments and found the link to the link to The Guardian article you linked to. Thanks for that, as I had appeared to have missed it, hitherto. However, I must correct you regarding the subject of rape under British law. Whilst a woman cannot rape a man (rape is even defined as penetration), sexual assault is recognised, and is actually gender neutral in Britain. Section 2(1) of The Sexual Offenses Act 2003, states: Assault by penetration A person (A) commits an offence if…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:50 PM
-13

Exactly. Representative, but not every single male in the country. It is the most accurate form of data, but if it is not every single person then it just cannot be 100%. Also consider how many may refuse to admit to themselves that they were abused, and give an answer contrary to the truth even when the poll was anonymous.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:24 PM
1

I am sure he'd love wearing some frilly panties for you. Fine by me. I like a bit of kink.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:20 PM
2

I guess it takes one 'stoop' to recognise another one then, stoop!
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:10 PM
4

Ah, thanks for pointing that out. Mine appears to be working differently. Either way, he's a fool.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:09 PM
2

Enjoy your divorce. Geez, man! What's your problem?! I'd love to have a househusband, and dress him up as my little maid... Some women do like that sort of thing, you know. Over the long term it could get problematic if he were contributing nothing towards bills, but if he were working from home (say an Internet business, or helping me with my business, etc.), then I can't see why it couldn't work. Everyone has different ways of living, and different women want different things from men, so don'…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:06 PM
13

Oh, grow up. If you weren't subscribed to /r/mensrights then it wouldn't appear on your /r/all page. Easy solution: unsubscribe, and feck off.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 05:42 PM
3

He should have been struck off.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 05:37 PM
-6

When I asked my SHARP rep, she said it was based on anonymous polling vs. official complaints. All well and good, but the problem is that not every male was polled. Only a sample of the population. It's not really a reliable figure.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 05:37 PM
1

If there is a link between trolling and domestic violence, does this mean that feminists who troll on men/MRA members, are also perpetrators of domestic violence against men? ;)
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:26 PM
2

why do these articles and so many people make the comment that "false rape accusations hurt real victims", I mean they do but they seem to gloss over how much this harms the person being falsely accused, just a mere accusation can harm a persons life and future. Exactly. But, not only does it ruin the lives of the falsely accused (which feminists don't seem to care about), but it means that real victims will eventually start being taken less seriously. Many victims already experience some suspic…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:45 PM
1

You're a complete idiot. Aww, I would insult you back, but I don't need to. Nature has already done a better job. Bless your little cotton socks.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:27 PM
1

Nice projection of yourself. And, thanks for showing all the Mens' Rights Redditors a textbook example of an 'ad hominem'. You might want to look that up. Lol.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:17 PM
1

I didn't say that being a victim of bullying discredits her opinion. To discredit a victim of bullying, is pretty much bullying them for being bullied (with regards their reputation, that is).
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:49 AM
1

I am a woman, and I have blogged on anti-feminist issues. Yet, I have received no abuse for any anti-feminist blog posts to date.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:04 AM
1

Go for it! You should definitely lodge a complaint against her.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:31 AM
1

That is actually bullying, and you should have reported her. It's sexist discrimination, and an attempt at psychological abuse, not to mention potentially damaging to your future career to mark you down so severely.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 12:13 AM
0

chill the fuck out Lol. Speak for yourself!
/r/MensRights04/09/13 11:04 PM
1

you failed to counter any of my points. That's because there was nothing worth addressing. Your points were weak, and had already been addressed in other comments I had made. I imagine that the derailing was intentional, that you know you are wrong but don't want to admit to it. In your dreams, mate.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:39 PM
0

She said she had never been bullied so much in her life as when she said she was antifeminist. Well, I've had some feminist trolls on Twitter, and a few on Reddit who have downvoted me ridiculously, but I can't say I've been outwardly bullied for saying I'm an anti-feminist. I've had heated debates with feminists, though. If she thinks that is bullying, she needs to enter the real world and see what real bullying is like. She's lucky she didn't go to a school like the one I did.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:26 PM
0

I find your statement telling me to try reading a little further up insulting. Wow, it doesn't take much to rattle you, then. Sorry that you're so easily offended. Maybe you should ask yourself why.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:16 PM
1

I'm sure some people exist that would say this, but I think you're taking things a bit far by claiming that society would. Read the OP's comment. He was called a "pussy". Incidentally, I don't believe he was! As I stated in an above post, he was actually brave. Try reading a little further up.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:54 PM
3

They'd "bone him" no matter what he did. If he'd have fought, he'd have been labelled a woman beater. If he'd ran away, he'd have been labelled a "pussy". And for standing there and taking it (which he did), he is called a "pussy". He couldn't win no matter what.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:18 PM
0

I wasn't being funny either. Maybe you're just paranoid that everything has an underlying meaning. Paranoia, much?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:14 PM
5

That's why I said in the above post that he couldn't win either way. Read further up, and you'll see it.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:12 PM
-8

I agree that he was foolish. Foolish, but brave for living up to social ideals and not giving into the natural instinct of defence.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:16 PM
1

A voilà! Info from the Crown Prosecution Service, which gives a legal definition, and also includes a helpline number for male victims: http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/prosecution/domestic/domv_guide_for_victims_and_witnesses_faqs.html
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:41 PM
-2

No sarcasm, dude. Maybe you need to learn how to read people better.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:33 PM
1

As a woman, I agree. And if the women can't stand up to the challenge, then (a) they're not real athletes, and (b) they should be paid less.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:30 PM
1

No, it's not the Law in England!
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:28 PM
1

1 in 2?! Who the hell would believe that statistic? That would mean a half of all women, which nobody could possibly believe is true.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:26 PM
21

I agree with you.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:14 PM
1

Jenna Marbles - a woman after my own heart! (At least in this video, and the one one how to fool people into thinking a woman is good looking!)
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:59 PM
1

I couldn't watch this all the way through. Sorry. Her voice got on my nerves, and so did her eyes which were permenantly stuck on her own webcam image on the computer screen, and the weird facial expressions. I think the problem is that she lacks confidence, hence the hair fiddling at the beginning, the reflection watching, and her rambling speech. It's a shame, because in what I did manage to listen to, she raised valid points that are some of the exact reasons for why I am an anti-feminist. So…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:47 PM
53

Personally, I think he was brave to have not defended himself. Most people would have (and rightly so), but instead this man did what was expected of him by society, and "took what was coming to him, like a man" and didn't hit a woman. That hardly makes him a "pussy", at all. It just makes him brave to have endured such abuse. The poor guy couldn't win, either way.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:42 PM
1

Yes, although there have been a number of arrests reported on lately, because a female teacher had sex with a boy. However, the media and public seem to give less sympathy to the abused boy, than when a girl is abused by a male teacher.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:35 PM
1

Can someone explain to me why there's a television episode for this instead of a court date? What am I missing? That is another reason why I questioned if this case had been scripted. Why was this woman not charged with the statutory rape of a minor?!
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:31 PM
1

I'm not entirely sure about this particular case. Yes, male rape most certainly happens, but I'm not sure if this particular case has been scripted for entertainment purposes. The boy keeps stifling back his smile, and looking like he is trying not to laugh, but of course, laughter and 'being a lad' may just be his way of dealing with the issue. He doesn't seem distraught at all, but then not all rape or sexual assault victims are. Some people are emotionally stronger than others, and better abl…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:05 PM
3

That's so sad. I hope it's not real. But oh, such a stupid thing to do. And very, very, very unfair. To be honest, judging by the non-chalant reaction of the ukulele player when his uke was snatched from him, I reckon it was probably staged. Granted, a ukulele isn't an expensive instrument, but he made no attempt to try and stop her taking it, and didn't react to it being thrown on the floor. My issue, however, is that people find this funny. Woulf people find it so amusing if he hit her to the …
/r/MensRights26/08/13 11:00 PM
16

This link was posted by somebody on my Facebook list. As I also wrote on that person's wall, women generally put in less overtime than their male counterparts. The 'average bonus' is calculated in terms of the overall average. Women are also generally less able to work as many hours of overtime, due to physical stamina. Men, whether we like it or not, generally have more physical stamina than the average woman. Hence their ability to work longer hours. Also consider that the overall average drop…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:26 PM
2

No problem with doing that, if it's just for you. I personally hate painting my nails, because it chips when trying to just do daily tasks and looks messy. I'm always suspicious of women with manicures and perfectly groomed nails. It's another sign of high maintenance, and also laziness, because any woman who does things for herself, would chip her nail varnish.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:26 AM
1

You said it!
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:21 AM
1

How obtuse are you? It's not about the "dog fucking".
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:26 PM
1

Haha! Thanks for demonstrating a cowardly attempt to avoid a cogent reasoning. You may also wish to revise your spelling and grammar.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:21 PM
1

Any more than posting some gay guy fucking a dog is proof that heterosexuality is better than homosexuality. False equivalence. You'll have to come up with a better example. For that matter, you'll have to think up a better reason as to why this isn't a Men's Rights issue. The issue is not "dogfucking", as you so "charmingly" put it, but it is attempting to highlight that men are not always the "dirty pervs" that they are portrayed as being, by feminists who imply women are always innocent.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:16 PM
1

Yes it is. It's pointing out that women are not so innocent themselves, and by highlighting these issues, perhaps men will stop being looked at as being the more perverted, predatorial gender.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:33 PM
1

I googled it just now. I think it was the Enumclaw horse-sex case. The horse ruptured his colon during anal sex. Geeeeez....! Google also brought up another case of a man dying after having sex with a donkey. What the bloody hell is wrong with people?! I don't wish anyone death, but is it any wonder they get hurt when they're sexually abusing those poor, defenceless animals?!
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:30 PM
1

She could buy a wig...
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:22 PM
1

I am the Messiah! /s
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:19 PM
1

I see your reasoning. Problem is, the dating scene is an indication of male dominance and indicator of potential virility. It's a sad fact that women like men who make the first move/take on a more active role, because genetically speaking, dominant males are subconciously believed to pass on the the strongest genes to their offspring. That's the case in most of the animal kingdom, anyway, and humans are essentially animals when we get down to the plain biology. That said, not all women are pass…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:17 PM
1

Oh my gosh, man - Sorry to hear that. Hope your mother is ok now.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:09 PM
1

Not really. It's more about status symbol. A little like men with a Ferrari. It serves to impress women and men, but is mainly a status symbol.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:05 PM
13

Bucking the "norm" means not buying into all the bullshit that woman wrote and doing what you're comfortable doing. It also means that nobody, but nobody, tells me what I have to do to keep a man. I don't move in with someone, redecorate their home, and then bitch that I had to buy all of that furniture that I wanted. How refreshing it is to hear that from another woman. I think much of the problem is also the result of women's magazines that give "advice" on what men supposedly want and expect,…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:19 PM
11

I think a large percentage of feminists are upper-middle class, and many are out of touch with working class women.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:06 PM
4

LOL!! Thanks for the link. I'll definitely have to check that out! ;)
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:22 PM
0

15-20 days???!! Are you sure? If any woman bled that much she'd be severely anaemic.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:18 PM
3

She'd probably then complain about the cost of the birth control pills! (Assuming she's not getting them for free in the UK)
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:41 PM
10

You don't need to spend a gazillion dollars on super extra exfoliating body wash. Precisely. And if women need to exfolate, they can use a homemade scrub recipe using oatmeal, and use an exfoliating face cloth for about £2.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:40 PM
1

And I bet there was hell of an outcry because he was a man. A woman would probably get more sympathy, and people would assume she was a victim of coercion or abuse.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:29 PM
13

And what is more ironic is that the author of the article complains about all the costs of being "attractive" to men, yet doesn't mention the most important part of any "beauty regime": Soap and shampoo! Without those two things, NOBODY is attractive! Hope she doesn't neglect those whilst having to invest on all the other extravagant "essentials"!
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:25 PM
25

Exactly. Women complain when men ogle, yet want them to make the first move. Can't win. But, if women took over a more active role, as you suggested, and if that were to become the norm in society, there would be less of an issue, perhaps.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:06 PM
5

The great thing about the hiking is that if more women took up hiking with men such as yourself, she wouldn't need to spend money on personal trainers and gyms, etc., to fit into expensive dresses that are too small. As for tans, well, some women burn badly outdoors so I can't comment on that issue. Tans aren't for everyone. But, she can still go hiking provided she wears sunscreen! :D
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:04 PM
3

This site is a sick joke Alas, I actually think it's for real. Zoophilia very much exists, sadly. the English and language is not indicative of a 23 year old non-native speaker. Maybe the "author" was university educated in an English speaking country, or is lying about their nationality for purposes of anonymity. After all, zoophilia is essentiall a criminal offense.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:24 AM
21

Exactly! That's why I never use it. "You know when you've been Tangoed!" :) That said, the expensive fake tan looks real. But, it still makes the skin stink. And if one washes, it fades. The only way to maintain it is to keep reapplying, or shower less often. Nice.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:14 AM
5

I guess it depends on the woman and the size of the pack. Some women need to change every hour, and others need to change 4-8hrs. Also slimmer women sometimes only menstruate for 3 days, and that's normal too. It can be 3-8 days (bigger women usually menstruate longest and heaviest). Also, towards the end of the period, the flow is lighter and many women only need a pantyliner. Besides, the tampons I bought last week were only about £1.79. She must have had a heck of a lot of tampons in that pac…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:47 AM
58

It's not so much about impressing the men. It's more about trying to compete against other women who might catch his eye. That's a major reason why so many women secretly hate each other and become so catty.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:43 AM
77

$14.95 on cheap fake tan that will actually cost $114.95 to replace the ruined sheets You heard it here chaps, avoid ladies with a tan. Sign of high maintenance! ;) Plus fake tan stinks.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:33 AM
5

Actually, $6.95 isn't even very much! One pack lasts a couple of months.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:32 AM
95

WTF???!!! I'm a woman, and my "beauty regime" doesn't come anywhere near that! Fake tan reeks, and most men hate it anyway (because of the smell and the fact it ruins the sheets). I have pure white skin, and have never had a problem attracting men. It cost us $385 just to make it to the table: that's the eyebrow shape, main-pedi, waxing, hair - $80 every four weeks for the pixie crop, $130 in extensions for the full Jen Hawkins If she did her own eyebrows (free!), used a home waxing kit (about £…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:27 AM
4

Women can be the biggest pervs of all.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:43 AM
6

Exactly! And just imagine if a man did the same to his dog. He'd be arrested.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:05 AM
0

Will Self was treated appallingly. Yet, I still can't believe that a writer of Will Self's calibre wrote an article for that ridiculous propaganda rag, The Daily Fail...!
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:37 AM
1

Fuck fashion, find your own. Exactly! And what I hate is the way society scorn at people who don't conform to the rest of the sheep who adhere to fashion trends. Just look at how a man is ridiculed if he were to walk down the street wearing a flouncy skirt. Yet, it's ok for a woman to do so... (Although there might still be some laughter if her tastes are different to current fashion trends.) Men definitely have the raw deal, though.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 12:27 PM
4

Nonsense! Most of the big name fashion designers are male! The high street merely follows the catwalk trends.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 12:24 PM
1

It will change one day. I refuse to be negative. If the MRM approach the situation intelligently, it could change society's view of men. This is why I always say that an aggressive MRM would be counterproductive. Too many people believe the BS feminist propaganda that males are "aggressive", and the MRM needs to change peoples' minds.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 03:16 AM
1

If a woman has been showing interest throughout the night, but by the time you get to the act she's sloppy, but still very interested, not so much rape, even if she decides to say so the next day. That's a complex topic. A woman/man still express an interest in someone without wanting to have sex. Alcohol can make us do things we wouldn't otherwise have wanted to do (even if romantic interest was expressed without the intention of having sex), but as long as the person is conscious when drunk, t…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:09 AM
2

I just don't think there is a double standard in THIS instance There is always a double standard. The problem of not wanting sex could apply to either gender. Criticizing his performance is unfair, but they're basically not having sex at all, which is the legitimate complaint. You're right. It is a complaint. But, instead of criticising his performance, the advice should have been to help him through it and to be more understanding. Sex doesn't stop for no problem. He might have low hormone leve…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 04:57 AM
1

No, we do not need radical MRM! Men already have a bad reputation for being "aggressive", so a radical MRM would only go to prove feminists and onlookers "right" about men. It would alienate men further. Aggressive men is a huge turn off for me, and I am someone who support egalitarianism and men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:35 PM
2

That sounds exactly like what I say, dude. And I have also been called a concern troll. I agree with you, but every now and then poke fun at the irony of feminists/women. And I'm a woman myself!
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:30 PM
-1

Way to patronise him. That really helps. Yup. He shouldn't have made assumptions. Then he wouldn't have been "patronised".
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:51 PM
0

You're entitled to your opinion, dude. But, my comment was absolutely true, and I'm sorry to burst your bubble and your illusion that some women have a good self-esteem. Like me, they're just good actresses. The "cocky"/arrogant ones just over-do the acting. I see through it, because arrogance/over-confidence is my "shell" to the outside world, and makes less people want to try and mess with me. It's a great place to hide. You obviously don't understand women very well. The difference between st…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:49 PM
-1

It's true.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:30 PM
0

Sweetie, I am a woman, and I'm talking from the experience of being a slim, attractive woman. Yet, despite that, I occasionally lack self-esteem from time to time, as do ALL women!
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:29 PM
1

Right, so tell me why HIV is on the increase in non drug users, Dufus! Risk of transmission is reportedly 0.08% for women. That is incredibly low. The figures don't add up!
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:59 PM
-6

To me, a strong woman has healthy self-esteem... No woman has a "healthy self-esteem'. Even those who claim they do, don't. That's why women secretly hate/envy each other and always go on diets. And those who eat a lot do so out of comfort because they've given up. So the weight piles on, and the self-esteem lowers all the more.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:55 PM
1

Excuse me, Dufus, but if you'd done your homework and applied your brain, you'd know that it is impossible to calculate risk! That is what is so stupid about the study. Plus, it was a small scale study using only about 100 people. The other ridiculous thing is that transmission is also dependant upon a person's immunity, and also the level of virus in the other person. A person on antiretroviral drugs will have a lower level of the virus in the body than a person who hasn't yet been put on antir…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:45 PM
0

more likely they would accuse you of chauvanism for offering to pay. Actually, all the feminists I know of refuse to let any man pay their bill. I'm an egalitarian woman, and I insist on sharing costs, taking the bill, or taking turns to pay, just as I would with my female friends. It is non-feminist women in general, who tend to be the ones expecting men to pay.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:31 AM
-10

A strong woman doesn't mean she has a bad attitude! A woman with a bad attitude is not "strong", either. That said, anyone who is unable to handle a strong woman, whether they are male or female, is potentially weak.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:18 AM
1

Perhaps, but in most cases it is down to sexual curiosity; not abuse!
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:06 AM
4

I'm sorry to read that you were raped. When I said insane, I meant that the actions of the authorities are insane. I believe a child "rapist" should be taught and counselled; not prosecuted.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:09 PM
1

That is total nonsense! Two young children playing "doctors" does not mean one or both were abused. Most kids play with each other's genitals simply because they're just curious!
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:04 PM
2

She needs to be taught, not presecuted. I agree. A 10 year old is only just starting to learn about sex, and is curious about it, but still very naive and unaware of the crime of rape. I didn't know what rape was when I was 10, even though I knew about sex. I think lots of kids experiment and play "doctor". That should not be a crime. And in the cases where one kid said no, teach them; don't prosecute.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:02 PM
-1

I'm a female, but I have to admit that I found your comment ridiculous.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:56 PM
1

I think you might actually have a point!
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:44 PM
3

Reading Cosmo isn't a case for mensrights, it's a case for involuntary euthanasia. Brilliant! That comment made me laugh! It has made me want to bang my head against the wall when I've read it in hospital waiting rooms, etc., and I'm a woman!
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:43 PM
3

This is insane! They're just two kids, and we don't even know the context of what happened. They may have been just playing, like little boys and girls do. Many children play with each others' "privates", because it's part of discovering the differences between the genders and early sexual curiosity. If the boy protested, then yes, maybe it was "rape". But, maybe it was a case of "Can I put your willy in my fanny?", to which he answered "ok". Something similar happened when I was 10. A little bo…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:31 PM
1

That's the whole point! There are no real stats at the moment, because HIV studies like the one you used, are funded by giant pharmaceutical companies. All we can do is play it safe and avoid unsafe sex.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:17 PM
1

I appreciate you're trying to comfort one man, but you are potentially misinforming thousands who read this. The researcher who headed the study that came up with the 0.04% figure you quoted (M.C. Boily, et al. 'Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.' Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2009 Feb;9(2):118–29.), is sponsored by The Wellcome Trust, who also funded that particular study. Wellcome is a partner of the pharmaceutical g…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:22 PM
-1

Your chances of getting HIV are 0.04%, assuming she has AIDS. Jesus Christ!!! It's no wonder that HIV is on the rise with misinformation and ignorance like this!!
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:11 AM
0

Those same stories were also reported by less "flakey" papers, such as 'The Independent' and WSJ.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:56 AM
1

Thanks for the link and input. Yes, it is a weak study and a weak article. But yet another article that implies that men are selfish and only do a good deed if it might benefit them. Women are actually just as bad.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 08:28 AM
0

I wonder how this study was conducted, and if it was conducted by a question and answer survey, whether the women were being honest. Look how many women do good deeds for the children of a man she's interested in, when she would probably otherwise ignore them; or the good deeds she does for the mother of a man she is interested in, even if she hates her guts. There are many more examples, yet this article makes out that men only do good deeds for the purpose of being attractive to the opposite s…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 08:19 AM
0

A lot of women do view sex as a service to men, actually. Some do have sex because a man wants it, and because they want to please their men; not because women want it every time.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:11 AM
1

"Personally, I believe men and women should both be able to say no to sex... And probably talk about the underlying causes. Though blaming everything on a period is really not helping people believe that women are in anyway equal to men..." Exactly my reason for posting.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:09 AM
5

you wiill continue to seek out the bad ones until you get some stuff inside sorted out. Look for help and it will be hard to find but it can make allhte diffenrnece. I agree with blueoak9, typos and all! ;) The problem is, those who have been badly treated early on in life, or in early relationships, tend to keep seeking out others who are "bad". You would think they would learn, but it is as though they want to go back to the same sort, in order to try and "fix" what they think went wrong last …
/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:15 AM
1

It's not a mens' issue. The OP is just one of the few entitled whiners who lower the tone amongst the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:27 PM
-1

Perhaps some men should. They might understand the process better!
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:25 PM
2

Great answer.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:24 PM
0

Brilliant! Shame more chauvinistic men who think they're "entitled", aren't put through this when they believe they automatically deserve more rights than women. There is nothing misandrist about this video. It merely shows men what women have to go through to give her husband a son or daughter when they ask for one. Albeit, some women are masochists! (They must be to go through that!!)
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:23 PM
1

Wow! Someone's got too much time on their hands... Scrolling back through all the comment history, and replying to 2-month old comments! That's kind of sad...
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:42 PM
4

Ah. I was about to rant about why we should take the reliability of this story with a pinch of salt because it's a Daily Fail article, but now I understand your reasoning. Still, I question the truthfulness of the article, and the claims made. Some bitter kids can be quite vengeful if their teacher didn't give them a reference or result they needed to get into university.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:51 PM
1

I'd rather not sit next to kids on public transport full stop. I like peace and quiet, without having kids wailing and whinging throughout the journey! Kids-only compartments, please!
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:40 PM
2

Not sure why you were just downvoted, because you're right to some extent. Even the London Mayor was treated like a child molester: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3634055/Come-off-it-folks-how-many-paedophiles-can-there-be.html And then there is this: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10182869
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:36 PM
3

That's exactly my view, and whilst most here are respectful, my god there are some real bigots amongst the MRAs. Especially when it comes to general women bashing, transgender male issues, crossdressing, or gay MRAs. It's sad when the odd few lower the tone so considerably.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:12 AM
7

What a crock of shit! The truth always comes out eventually, and relationships usually lead to intercourse pretty early on these days. So, do you honestly believe a man would fail to notice his lady friend has a penis?! Even with the lights off, he'd have to be unbelievably dumb not to realise that women have a vagina, and that his partner hasn't got one! And the same goes for a person who fails to notice her/his female-male partner has no penis.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 01:01 AM
6

Oh, big deal! - One friend versus the entire population of earth. Get some perspective, man! Not all trans people would hide their genetic gender. Some men and women are dishonest, but not all are. Same goes for trans people. Your comment was a disgrace.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:23 AM
0

God, you're a touchy bugger. I didn't say that it doesn't happen. I said I don't know of many who do it. Big difference! I also don't know of many men who would grope a strange woman, either. Both genders do it, but not that many. Context is everything!
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:19 AM
1

Oh, get real! Nobody who inititates physical contact is a rapist! A person is only a rapist if they have committed rape!
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:10 AM
0

No... Of course not... I just happen to be one! Lol! What I said was that I don't know of many who would do that to a stranger. Likewise, I don't know of many men who would grope a strange woman either. Yes, both do it, but not as many as feminists and masculists claim.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:09 AM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:08 AM
6

I'm a woman, and have been made welcome by most here, so I cannot see why most would not welcome a trans person, as this sub is generally egalitarian. You do not have to be male or female to support mens' rights, which is a branch of human rights (and thus a topic of interest to me). Also, having been both female and male, I would find you one of the most interesting people in this sub, as you have experience of living as both genders, and can contribute so much of value from having experienced …
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:00 AM
4

What a bigot you are! People like you sure lower the tone of this thread, as do the women bashers.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:57 PM
1

Lol! Well, I don't know of many women who would grope a stranger! But "dog calling", I admit a lot of women do that. That's how women are taught to flirt in womens' magazines like 'Glamour'!
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:54 AM
1

Huh? Plain English, please!
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:44 AM
1

Unfortunately, even if successful with discrimination regarding domestic violence, if in the UK, custodial rights are automatically granted to the mother, and the father has no legal right unless the couple are married.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:27 AM
-1

Oiled bodies are rough. Most women wouldn't touch an oiled up man with a barge pole, so you're safe!
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:18 AM
1

"If a woman makes some kind of a move on me, though it doesn't bother me I'll possibly report it." Christ! So if a woman tries to initiate physical contact, she risks a criminal record, and if a man tries, he might too!! So, how the hell does one "get it on"? Whatever happened to consensual romantic passion and spontaneity?! I'm a woman who likes to make the first move, so how am I to tell if it's ok to grab him and passionately kiss before ripping each other's clothes off? I know men face the s…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 10:43 AM
5

As the saying goes, "there's an element of truth in every joke"...
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:45 PM
1

Hear, hear! Furthermore, every vote wasted on this small party, is a potential gain for the bloody Tories (or even the UKIP, who are making enormous gains!)! We've had enough xenophobic, civilisation erroding, right wing shit, now. The position in the UK is getting increasingly more worrying.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:32 PM
2

Britain needs a hell of a lot more than a pro-mens' rights party! What is your plan for economic recovery? What is your position on the EU? What is your position on ECHR? What are your plans for the NHS? How do you plan to tackle the problems with lack of housing? Furthermore, if you're a former Tory, I will most certainly not be joining or voting. Since when have the toe-rag Tories ever been genuinely pro-equality? Equality stands for more than just gender equality, which is something the Torie…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:28 PM
1

"shit or get off the pot." Last time I read quotes by Martin Luther King, that was an unsourced quote, of questionable authenticity!
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:19 PM
0

"Back patting each other for being transgressive doesn't elevate childish tantrums. "Fuck their shit up" is your motto? Seriously? And you admit that without a trace of self examination, or thinking, "hmm, this really doesnt sound very bright..." I actually agree with you. Slogans such as "Fuck their shit up", merely makes the MRAs sound like a group of thugs. Sometimes the war between the two genders is like some form of fascism. There are times when the MRAs really are just as poisonous as the…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:09 PM
0

Depends on which country you are talking about. In the UK, there is no such test.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:59 AM
2

I presented evidence that testosterone leads to violent thoughts What evidence? You merely asserted your opinion. An opinion is not evidence. In fact, it is a fallacy. You may wish to familiarise yourself with the term argumentum ad verecundiam. For it to be "evidence", you need to provide sources to verify your argument. Has education taught people nothing?! Lol. Now, this is some "evidence" to support a claim to the opposite, and that estrogen causes aggression: http://www.crimetimes.org/04b/w…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:17 AM
0

"The president always says if you want to out-innovate, out-educate, out-compete the competition, you're only going to do it with men leading the way," Romney said. Which is why the Republicans have this??http://www.nfrw.org/programs/scholarships.htm Romney was just talking shit to try and appeal to the male voters, and any misogynists out there.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:11 AM
0

It's not only Obama. The Republican party also have a "women's only" club, including special scholarships exclusively for women! http://www.nfrw.org/programs/scholarships.htm
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:05 AM
3

Actually, just having oral sex from a person with a cold sore can cause genital herpes. As for example two, that is what a lot of inexperienced kids may try and do. It's considered sexual assault if he did it without her consent first, but is it worth ruining his life for if he stopped after she said no? - Absolutely not! He was probably just trying to be passionate, thinking she'd like the spontaneity, just like people do in the films he may have watched. Some people really need to get things i…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:43 AM
1

True! Feminists have certainly been known to troll on me for being a non-feminist woman.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:39 AM
1

I'm not so sure about your theory. Also consider the statistics will also increase because of the very many cases where a 15 year old girl and her 17 year old boyfriend decide to have sex. It is considered statutory rape, even though the intercourse may very well have been fully consensual, and very little age difference between the two partners.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:05 AM
2

Interesting. Which US State law did you look at? In the UK, cases where complainants have voluntarily consumed substantial quantities of alcohol are very all too common. However, the case of R v Bree [2007] decided that drunken consent is still consent. The key issue is whether the person is conscious, as capacity is an essential ingredient of the definition of consent. A complainant will not have the capacity to agree by choice where she/he is so overcome by drink/drugs that the person's unders…
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:58 AM
7

You should also include that consensual drunken sex is also not rape. A lot of people seem to think it is. Legally speaking (in the UK) at least, drunken consent is still a valid consent if the person is voluntarily intoxicated. Sure, a partner could "take advantage" of the situation, and a woman may feel angry at both herself for allowing it to happen, and for him taking advantage of her voluntary lack of judgement (it happened to me many years ago, and know how disappointed I felt in myself, a…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:53 PM
26

Little story: A male relative of mine was awarded full custody of his daughter after his wife abandoned their daughter. It forced him to sort himself out, and give up drink and drugs, so that he could make sure he could look after his daughter properly. The girl's mother battled for custody a few years later, but was awarded only visitation rights, despite not being abusive to the daughter or on drugs/drink (as far as was known). The court believed he was the better parent, and the mother has ne…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:11 AM
-1

True, but over all, left-wing politics shows more evidence of progress. Maybe not with regards Men's Rights, yet; but certainly in other areas of life.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 04:11 PM
-1

I wouldn't say the Democrats are always Feminist, though. A feminist slant, yes. But, not inherently feminist (unless you count Hilary Clinton). Certainly, Obama is the most progressive US President with regards gay rights and legalising cannabis, etc.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 04:10 PM
2

The UK Conservative Party also have a women-only society: http://www.conservativewomen.org.uk/women_parliament.asp Right-wing politics is not pro-men at all!
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:23 PM
2

Oh, you won't find skin thicker than mine! I certainly don't let it get to me. I insult them back, and have a good laugh at their ridiculous comments and accusations during the process. It sure is fantastic comedy!
/r/MensRights06/03/13 05:20 PM
1

Good looks and success in other areas of life, doesn't necessarily mean success in relationships. That is something else all together, which is why the biggest layabouts living on welfare can sometimes be more lucky in relationships than someone who earns a lot of money. If a person is loyal to a poor man, then you know they're a keeper. Never flaunt your wealth or success! - You're more likely to attract the wrong sort if you do. Success in relationships is also more about positive attitute, sp…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:32 PM
3

Have more confidence in yourself!
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:35 PM
3

I would date you. Ah, bless you. But, I bet you wouldn't if you knew me!
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:31 PM
2

If you mess up, admit it. sometimes people say things and don't realize how it sounded. Hear, hear! And I hope people will take on board this wise advice. Everyone says something hurtful without realising sometimes. Apologise when picked up on it, and don't hold grudges when someone says something ridiculous. We're only human. Don't allow others to treat you special only because you're a woman. If someone holds the door open for you, but not the guy carrying groceries or herding kids behind you,…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:27 PM
11

There are some very hurt people who have been abused by the system here, and that comes out as a dislike of women in general. I'm sorry people make you feel that way, try to think of it like the way a female victim of abuse acts towards men. I understand that, and realise the reason for why so many men may feel so angry. However, it is then quite ironic when you consider that men get so offended when women who have faced similar abuse from a man in their life (maybe abused by an uncle, etc.), an…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:14 PM
2

We do what we can to spread fairness and equality around. The feminists certainly know how to harass when faced with a woman who opposes their theories, however. It just shows how infantile they are.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:50 PM
29

I don't feel like shit, because I know I'm not one of those who goes out of my way to fuck up guys' lives. I have, however, faced some trolls in this subreddit who have accused me of being a feminist and attempted to make me feel bad for being a female. This has happened whenever I have tried to debate something to the contrary on a specific comment, despite never saying anything remotely feminist. Incidentally, I cannot comment on a feminist thread without facing constant attack for disagreeing…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:45 PM
0

Today I realized that in my entire life I have never seen or met a male secretary I have! - There are quite a few young male receptionists, and also male admin, working in the NHS, albeit not nearly many as women. Quite a few working at hotel reception desks these days, too (although not really secretarial as such, which a receptionist job in a health centre often is). But, times are slowly changing! Not so long ago, there were much fewer male receptionists or administrators around.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:32 PM
2

What the hell?! Is this a joke?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:44 AM
1

... considering the rate at which proven false accusers (self-admitted even) have had nothing done, and in some cases actually get monetary benefit... the system is clearly not working. That I agree with. However, my point is, how can it be proven beyond reasonable doubt that an accusation really was false? If it can be proven 100% (such as a self admission of lying), then by all means, prosecute - and very rightly so. Other than in such a case, it could lead to innocent victims being accused of…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:15 PM
0

What passes through that pea-sized brain of yours is of no consequence. And what passes through that grain of sand in your head, which you, rather questionably, may call a "brain", is of absolutely no consequence to me, either. So, I guess that makes us even. Oh, except... My brain just happens to be the larger one out of the two of us, as you suggested in your comment. Bless.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 12:11 PM
1

Neither the police nor judge should be taking into consideration the personal feelings of someone when debating whether or not to charge someone with a crime. Where did I mention anything about "feelings", Bozo? Yet another straw man. I'm not going to repeat the same argument again, so may I suggest you actually read all the comments on the thread before incorrectly assuming that you think you know what I am saying. Ok?
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:38 AM
0

Rather, efforts are best diverted to harming said entity. Females can do as they please; I avoid them either way, so they cannot harm me. I think you have issues.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:28 AM
4

Great post, OP. Whereabouts are you located? More women should join in.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:07 AM
1

I love you, Modron! Please don't hate men so! Despite your infantile behaviour, I am actually a philandrist. But, I think you knew that already! This is just another cheap attempt to try and discredit, and divert attention away from the issues that I raised.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:21 AM
0

I went back and looked at some of the comments from the weekend, and I see who she probably is. Please do enlighten me. I'm curious to know who my alleged twin is. Incidentally, I was looking through a few previous posts of mine, and I think I've worked out who both of your Reddit alter egos are. Nice try! You have a very short fuse with the haters, and this is something that is going to get to you eventually. I'm not one of the "haters", believe it or not. I am not on any particular side. I see…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:10 AM
0

So instead you want to blow it all on cases that have no legal basis and shouldn't even be presented in the courtroom to begin with? I never said that, and you know it. There are many rape cases with flimsey evidence that should not have even reached court in the first place.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:56 AM
0

Umm... that is what they can and should be doing right now. Exactly! Therefore, you should know that if a victim is ripped apart by the defence, and ultimately discredited, despite her accusation being true, there is, perhaps, a possibility of he/she being charged for perverting th course of justice. I am not saying it would happen, but it is a problem that needs to be considered an issue, before everyone here jumps on the bandwagon, and says "jail all false accusers". How does one establish if …
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:43 AM
0

Who is "us"? You and the two other Reddit names you use to troll my posts? Or you and your fellow feminists, of whom you say you are not one? Or do you say "us" the way Satan does (". . . we are legion")? Wow! I realised you were deluded, but not quite as deluded as that! Now, when someone is that suspicious of another, I always ask myself why. Maybe it's because it is actually you who has multiple Reddit accounts, and trolls upon others. Therefore, you project your pathetic, infantile, behaviou…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:24 AM
0

Your anger is very odd. Lol! Who said anything about me being angry? Your delusion is also very odd, as is your clear lack of literary comprehension. Bless.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:12 AM
-2

This, ladies and gentlemen, is what a very angry feminist looks like having a hissy fit. To play you at your own game: This, ladies and gentlemen, is an example of an ad hominem from a troll who can only throw cheap insults, because he has not the intelligence to form a cogent argument. Incidentally, I am not a feminist. Thanks for demonstrating your bigotry to all Reddit users, however.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:22 PM
-1

What other names do you go by here, as if I didn't know? Ha! What a cheap comeback. It is clear that you have lost the argument (if you can call it that, as you have presented nothing other than cheap insults), so you resort to ridiculous ad homs in an attempt to falsely discredit me. How utterly ridiculous you are. I agree with you, my dear Glad to hear it, doll. I don't agree with your premise: that anyone wants to prosecute every accuser for every man acquitted Well, please do enlighten me as…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:15 PM
-2

In other words, you cannot come up with any facts to challenge me. How pathetic you are.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:59 PM
0

I'm referring to UK law, which is what I'm familiar with. I'm not terribly familiar with US criminal law, I'm afraid. So I will have to take your word for that until I read up on it.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:58 PM
1

In what respect?
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:56 PM
-4

You are putting me on, right? It's the old "it'll open the floodgates!" argument as a reason to deny... What are you banging on about, chap? I said nothing of the sort. Don't start your ridiculous straw man arguments with me! You would do well to spend a few weeks studying the horrors at my blog Community of the Wrongly Accused and its predecessor False Rape Society. And you would do well to spend an hour talking with a Supreme Court Judge. You clearly have no clue how the justice system works i…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:47 PM
1

That thread is days old. Secondly, your point is a complete straw man. I said nothing about men actually needing to be mind readers, and you know it. Go and troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:39 PM
-6

I agree whole heatedly that a person who makes a false rape allegation should be held accountable, but how do you think the state/country could possibly finance all those cases? I too, follow the legal system closely, and I can tell you it's struggling to keep up with the case load as it is. Criminal hearings, such as fraud cases, are taking 12-18 months to reach court in the UK, whilst some wrongly accused men are left to sit in prison waiting for their hearings. Morally, yes, we need to do som…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:28 PM
0

It will be very hard for the state to prove beyond reasonable doubt that an accuser lied solely on the grounds that the defense discredited the accuser. Exactly, so then it presents a question mark over the acquitted rape defendant all over again. Do you see where I'm coming from, here? If it cannot be proven whether a victim lied or was just mistaken, it could potentially lead to society pointing the finger at the wrongly accused man who was acquitted, and ruin his reputation all over again. It…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:20 PM
-6

Exactly! However, if they cannot prove the victim's guilt, then it raises a question mark over the rape trial. Thus, it not only makes a mockery of the justice system, but if the acquitted rape defendant was innocent, the fact that the victim could not subsequently be proven guilty, could then taint the aquitted man's name all over again! Furthermore, I doubt the courts or police would be able to afford the cost of all the investigations and trials of male and female victims who lost their cases…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:17 PM
-6

You're speaking as an idealist; not a realist. The problem is, what may seem like sufficient evidence to the prosecution, could still be discredited by a strong, and unscrupulously harsh, defence. Many guilty rapists have been acquitted over the years, just as many innocent men have also been wrongly convicted.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:08 PM
-3

That would be a travesty of justice Precisely my point. The problem is, there is a possibility of such a thing occurring if it were made standard procedure to prosecute rape victims who were defamed by a particularly brutal defence in the court room, and thus tainted a "liar" if the defendant from the rape trial happened to be wrongly acquitted.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:55 PM
-5

No one is saying that every single person who accuses someone of rape and doesn't get a guilty conviction be punished. This is about people who are PROVEN (in the court of law... so beyond a reasonable doubt) to have intentionally and maliciously crafted a lie And you don't see the problem in that argument? The defence will do all they can to discredit the victim, innocent or not, in order to try and win the case. If an innocent victim is discredited and defamed by an unscrupulous defence, he/sh…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:48 PM
1

I'm on the fence with regards this one. On the one hand, people who make false rape allegations should be charged for perverting the course of justice. On the other hand, what if a person is legitimately raped, but is discredited in court? It could lead to genuine victims being criminalised. I mean, what country is this... Congo? (Where male rape victims are arrested for homosexual acts). Also, it could stop genuine victims from coming forward for the fear of a criminal record of their case fail…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:56 PM
6

I was glad when someone corrected OP to point out that actually since the Sexual Offences Act 2003 a man CAN be raped, albeit only by another man. That would be me! ;) Thanks for setting the record straight with a new post. Incidentally, male rape has been legally recognised since 1994 in the UK, but was only statutorily enacted to specifically include anal penetration, in 2003.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:46 PM
2

If "egalitarianism is a hogwash", does that mean women should stop supporting the MRM, and turn to feminism instead?
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:43 PM
2

This was posted by someone else earlier. It's an old article, and prior to 1994, male rape was not recognised under English Common Law. This article is dated 1992. With regards today's English Law, section 1(1) of the Sexual Offences Act changed the previous law to include anal penetration, which thus, finally recognised male rape in the statute. Statutorily speaking, the previous law was only concerned with vaginal penetration, and used other offences to criminalise these forms of sexual violen…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:17 PM
3

The legal system is more on the men's side now, than it used to be! At least there is some progress in the UK, albeit still a significant number of issues.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:05 PM
1

Bless your heart.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:37 AM
1

I don't have to take anything to live well. That's just it. You're not living well. Nobody who feels as bitter and distrustful as you do is "living well" or living a happy life. I honestly pity you, man. I terminate employees & consultants who are as argumentative as yourself. Why? Because they intimidate you, and make you feel belittled in some way? Maybe that's why so many women falsely believe they "belong at the top", if they have employers such as yourself. It is people like you who create …
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:10 AM
1

So I guessed correctly. Well, you had a 50/50 chance of guessing my gender correctly, so that hardly makes you Mystic Meg! I would suggest that for dosage you follow what is printed on your prescription No bottle here, mate. I've not yet been prescribed anything for the "insanity" that you allege... Or maybe I was, but lost it up my vajayjay whist masturbating during that psychotic episode I had last week. But, as you seem to believe your the authority on the female psyche, I'm asking you for yo…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 02:13 AM
2

Yes. It is sad that many women don't seem to grow out of it. Of course there are male bullies too, and trans bullies. Bullies are everywhere in society, sadly.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 02:07 AM
2

Get your head out of your vagina. Get your head out of your arse, first. Maybe then I'll take you seriously. What I write here is after marriage & relationships spanning decades. Which only goes to prove your solipsism. The facts about women are ugly, don't shoot the messenger. Facts based upon... Your self-experience? The world is larger than your centralised universe. Also, people seem to keep going for the same "type", despite problematic relationships in the past. When will people learn, eh?…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:56 AM
1

Hate to use the "M" word, but in your case, you are one misogynistic, bitter, twisted, closed-minded guy. Let me guess: you probably live alone? It is clear that you are feeling bitterness towards all women, because you have been unlucky enough to had bad experiences with relationships, and perhaps have been bullied in the workplace yourself. I actually feel sorry for you. But, you should know that your solipsism doesn't apply to the entire gender in reality, just as I know that my experience of…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:23 AM
1

I know! And I was agreeing with you by adding to your comment: "Gee, maybe women just bully because women sometimes bully."
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:34 PM
0

I agree with a lot you are saying. To be honest, both movements need to do more to help gay and trans people. Hatred doesn't solve anything. Nor does ignoring an issue.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:55 PM
1

Yeah, I'm fine. Provided I keep going, get out of bed, and stay away from negative people, I'm fine. Hope yours is under control too.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:54 PM
1

Do you take anything for it? I'm so resistant to the idea of taking them because of all of the side effects. I hear you. I've had GPs try and push prescriptions at me. I always refuse. I deal with it with physical activity. Exercise and fresh air helps. And studies have shown that exercise works just as well, if not better, than antidepressants. Furthermore, many anti-depresants make people more depressed. Very few doctors also seem to realise that depression can stem from an undiagnosed physica…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:33 PM
2

Spot on!
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:22 PM
2

Even for women, depression is not about crying. People seem to think that depressed people cry all day long. Maybe for some that is true, but for me at least, crying is not a part of it. As you describe, it's about feeling empty and numb. You don't get enjoyment from things anymore, and you just feel lost. You don't want to talk to anyone, and just want to live in your own world away from people. Nobody understands, and think that the reason you ignore them is because you are being rude or don't…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:07 PM
2

Assuming this post is genuine, this is perhaps one of the saddest things I've read in a while. Not in LA, but hope you find manage to help from someone. It certainly seems that a number of people here want to help, which is encouraging. Are there no male homeless facilities at all in LA, or someone who can finance a ticket for you to go home to your family? I'm sure a number of us here can pull together and chip in to buy you a flight or a train home, and then arrange for you to collect the alre…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 12:49 PM
5

Is this genuine?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 12:44 PM
0

Oh, I'm not disputing that there is feminist hatred for gay men, too. I suspect it is because a number of gay men are pro-MRA. It is usually the more feminine gay men who side with the feminists. It is the transgender community which is usually a little better supported by feminists. Not an article (give me a moment, and I will do little search), but there is certainly [this thread] (https://mobile.twitter.com/DeathToHamsters/status/249571657470070784) that was discovered on Twitter, disregardin…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:01 AM
1

Women bully when they're feeling insecure, threatened, or intimidated by another.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:45 AM
1

True. I used to chase little boys around, and terrorise them in the playground when I was 9. Thinking back, I probably did have a crush on one of them. I played "marriage" once... I wore a cardigan over my head like a veil, ran around the playground chasing after one of the poor boys who I think I must have had a little crush on (because one of the teachers told my mother that he was always staring at me "lovingly" in class!), grabbed him and dragged him over to a group of girls who I'd arranged…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:41 AM
1

Lol! Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles... Those were the days! They were cool!
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:29 AM
3

That comment is just plain sexist. Not ALL women in the workplace are like that. I could say "all men in the workplace are back stabbing bastards and hate women". I know they're not, but many women think they are, which is just as sexist as your comment.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:28 AM
3

Sorry to hear about that. Is there someone higher up you can report that to? There was an employment discrimination case in the UK where a man successfully sued his work colleagues for homophobic discrimination and bullying.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:23 AM
2

For clarification: you find which part to be the opposite? That feminists are homophobic? I find MRAs to be more homophobic than feminists. I've encountered a number of masculists who ridicule effeminate men, and who also say gay issues are nothing to do with MRM. Too many also regard transgender issues gay issues, which are not the same thing. Both of them are shunned from both groups to a large extent. But, I do find feminists more open to gay men. A number of MRAs seem to fear them because it…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:58 AM
2

Exactly! If we are to tackle this issue, we need to somehow get through to the poor kids via media awareness. It's their only chance of learning about the truth. They certainly won't hear it at home when they have mothers like theirs!
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:37 PM
2

Gosh, that was young. Didn't get my first crush until 12!
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:34 PM
2

I actually find that to be the opposite, to be honest. I argued with a couple of masculists on Twitter once, who argued that gay men and gay rights should have no business with the MRM. They argued that MRM should be limited to men's reproductive and custodial rights.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:24 PM
1

If anything, many gay men side more with the feminists than the MRM, as do many transgender men who feel discriminated against by masculists.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:20 PM
1

Egalitarians don't really pick sides, mate. They choose a "side" based upon the fairness of a particular situation. There may be a time I'll be a little more on the feminist's side, depending upon the issue, so long as it does not discriminate upon men.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:17 PM
0

I'd pity the cat. No cat deserves owners like them!
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:06 PM
7

Where was the word "faggot" used?! EDIT: Ah... I see it now. It's at the bottom of the comments: "The vast majority of MRAs are macho dicktards who express their repressed faggotry by their woman-hating ideology." There was worse said than "faggotry" on this blog post. Poor choice of heading, OP.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:50 PM
1

Oh my god... [The Gherkin] (http://www.30stmaryaxe.com/) building in London (30 St. Mary's Axe) is oppressing me as a woman! I don't think I've read anything quite so absurd as this in a while! I couldn't help but laugh out loud! For heaven's sake, it's just a funny snow statue. And what is so awful about a penis anyway?! It's just a body part!
/r/MensRights02/03/13 02:24 PM
2

Now [this] (http://www.flickriver.com/photos/lancashire/3473724751/) is oppressive to all men! Alas, if it were torn down, feminists would claim it was an act of misogyny and a hatred of the female physique!
/r/MensRights02/03/13 02:19 PM
4

At 8 years old??! A bit young to be flirting. Name calling post-13 usually is flirting, but it's a different kind of name calling at that age. It's just irritating, rather than hurtful.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 11:30 AM
5

The MRM certainly needs to raise awareness to men, and encourage them to come forward and report it when bullied by female colleagues!
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:08 AM
8

True. Although, interestingly, my experience is that boys tend to bully girls the most before the age of about 12 or 13. Girls start bullying each other around about 10 years old, and continue it into late teens. And in their teens, the girls bullying is much more aggressive than the boys were, who generally just call girls names (although still hurtful and confidence knocking) and pull on their ponytail. No doubt many of those girls who bully, continue it into the workplace.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 03:57 AM
11

Comment from a male in the comments section: I think the author ignored a very important rising trend in bullying, women on men. At work, I have repeatedly been the victim of vicious bullying by the women, including having my hair pulled and lunch money stolen. Furthermore, I was told I was fat and unattractive. Bravo to the commentator for raising that important point.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:51 AM
2

Unless something affects a person personally, the majority of those people won't care, sadly. Humans really are a selfish breed!
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:03 PM
1

In many respects I absolutely agree. They will never change their minds on this. Maybe this generation won't, but if men make sure their voices are heard, who knows how society's views may change. Sure, there will always be gender discrimination in society to some extent, as is the case with racism, but we have seen much improvement with regards race equality over the past 50yrs. I am confident we will see improvement with regards gender equality, too. They can hear story after story, see mounta…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:59 PM
2

From what I've seen, there is often an element of both.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:17 PM
2

I think the users here could moderate themselves a little better at times. True. I'm guilty of "idiot bashing"! ;) Incidentally, I did call someone a "faggot" the other day, simply because the feminist arguing with me was called "dontcallmefaggot". I admit that wasn't the classiest thing to do, but that user was really starting to get on my tits! - Sorry to say. I know what you mean about the woman bashing, though. I'm guilty of doing it a little, and I'm a woman myself. No doubt there are times…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:56 PM
2

I think that is precisely the problem. It appears as though some try to point out female privilege in a way that looks more like female bashing, although they may not have been intending to bash.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:49 PM
6

I didn't downvote you. But, since you insist...
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:09 AM
7

Don't even go there! Our issues with circumcision has nothing to do with religion, and you know it. Circumcision is child abuse!
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:03 AM
0

I agree that there can be quite a lot of woman bashing in here from the odd few. In some respects, certain members of this sub are just as bad as feminists, which really is quite ironic. I think those particular gentlemen in question are just using this sub to let out their post-relationship breakup anger, and not because they genuinely care about the real aim of the MRM/equality. Some others seem to have some kind of unresolved issues with women because of their childhood experiences with their…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:53 AM
1

Thanks for your kind comment, and voting me up. On average, yes, I think most women want men who earn more, but I'm from a family where the opposite was the case, and so I really do not mind if a man earns less. All that matters to me is that he's not a sit at home scrounger, like some of the gold-digging housewives, whom we loathe do. Equality means BOTH should contribute to the household, but if a man earns less that doesn't matter. However, I have found that weaker men can be very resentful o…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 04:05 PM
1

I like it. Only problem is, it would be a compliment to a Hindi woman, as the Hindus worship the cow (so I'm told!).
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:57 PM
0

Err, you added a third and crucial element to "conscious and of age", namely a reasonable belief in consent. I didn't "add" anything. That was my whole point. DPP v Morgan is no longer controlling. But it is still considered by the courts. Granted, since 2003, rape had become a crime of negligence, rather than intention or recklessness, which means that whilst it is still the case that an honest mistaken belief is inconsistent with mens rea, it is no longer the case that liability for rape is re…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:47 PM
1

If it is pointed out to them without looking as though you are lecturing them or attacking them, then yes, there is hope.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:00 AM
1

Not all career women think that way. I admit a heck of a lot/most do; but not all - I can assure you. It is unfair to tar everyone with the same brush. That's what feminists do with men.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:55 AM
0

We can also do without your pathetic attempt at ad homs, and dismally failing. Go and troll elsewhere. Unless you have something interesting to say about the thread topic itself, I'm not going to bother wasting another word on you.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 05:25 AM
1

No. That person LIED! - Hence the insult. I can forgive ignorance, but not blatant lies. I will not apologise, so at least get your facts straight before you dare to get on your "moral" high horse, and tell me what to do! Shame on you!
/r/MensRights28/02/13 05:15 AM
1

I am not at all confused about my political stance. I am extremely left wing, but as an independent woman, I support MRs as a branch of human rights. True Left-wingers are actually egalitarian. I get the impression some MRAs want women back in the kitchen, and anti-emancipation goes against EQUALITY. Men here despise women who live off/scrounge from men (and quite rightly so, too!), yet they hate emancipation. A bit of a paradox, don't you think?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 05:11 AM
1

True. However, as both yes/no are false dichotomies, that makes them both equal with regards no "maybe".
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:23 PM
0

emancipated women, the biggest win is to lose fast, before investing anything in them. Find girls who appreciate fairness, understand men's issues, etc. There are some out there. Hey, let me get one thing straight, I'm an "emancipated woman", and I completely appreciate fairness, thank you very much. I understand MRs as much as any human rights, and we're all in this life together. And I am not a feminist, and I do not believe that women are any more entitled than a man is. I am an egalitarian a…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:41 PM
2

Oh, Lord, no! Not shrew! ("Taming of the Shrew") That takes us back to Shakespearian days...!
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:35 PM
3

A friend of mine keeps calling certain men "whiney" if they complain or protest about something. I get so annoyed at her sometimes. Society, in general, is so ignorant. But, I guess it's all down to that goddamn Patriarchy again!! ;)
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:23 PM
2

Female chauvinist pig...?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:20 PM
3

The bullying is not always even intentional. Sometimes it's just down to ignorance, and a lack of life experience, in the case of younger women. I've been guilty of it at times during my youth, without having been aware of it, simply because most of society does it and I'd never really stopped to look and think. Girls are brought up hearing women say, "Huh! Men! They're all the same!", or "They all only want one thing!", "Men are pervs", etc., and so young women start believing it, before questi…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:16 PM
-1

I think it's perfectly acceptable for a husband and wife to ask, "Want to have sex?" every time. I didn't say it wasn't acceptable. I just question the need for a married couple who supposedly love and TRUST each other, to need to ask all of the time. Also, there is something so tacky about, "Hey, baby... Wanna 'ave sex, huh?" It takes the romance out of a relationship. There are ways of initiating sex, and explicitly saying no, without needing to ask a long term partner who you trust, in such a…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:35 PM
1

Good, innit? Incidentally, do you even know which "Modron" my alias is even based upon? I doubt it. Until you know for sure, you can laugh on the other side of your face. ;)
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:14 PM
2

I have not come across presumed consent in law regarding organ donation, but I haven't taken Health Law yet. Well, I have. Trust me, it is a term. It also applies to blood tests when a patient gives their arm, so very similar to the implied consent in sex to a point. I also suggest rereading section 76 (and the previous section for criteria of when it's triggered) again more carefully. It is about evidentiary presumptions regarding when the ABSENCE of consent (and the defendant's knowledge of th…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:15 PM
-1

Why presumed consent instead of presumed non-consent? Wouldn't presumed non-consent stop situations like this which has clearly disturbed the person in question? Ask the legislators! Besides, you cannot seriously expect a husband and wife to say, "Oooh, yes, I give my full consent to shag!", every time they want to have sex. How utterly ludicrous! If someone explicitly says no, then take it as no. If someone struggles of pushes, take it as no. I someone is unconscious (or even just drunk - just …
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:01 PM
1

As a RAINN volunteer, this is very very dangerous thinking. Well, it ain't my thinking (although I believe it). It's how the English Legal system thinks.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:56 PM
1

Are you sure you're capable?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:53 PM
7

Your claim of "if she was conscious and of the age of statutory consent, then consent can be presumed" has no basis in law that I'm aware of. Ha! Proof you did not bother to read the link, you liar. You may wish to educate yourself of the concept of consent in R v Bree (2007) in English Law. Although a case regarding alcohol, the decision was: 'where a complainant had voluntarily consumed substantial quantities of alcohol, but nevertheless remained capable of choosing whether to have intercourse…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:59 PM
1

It is far better to err on the side of caution than to get into a legal gray area that you will most assuredly lose. True. But I can tell you that under UK law, her case would fail in court.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:44 PM
-2

As a boy I was taught that "No means No" Today they teach, "Only Yes means Yes" Erm... Does that not equate to the same thing? No doesn't mean yes, and yes doesn't mean no. Just as 2x3=6 and 3x2=6.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:41 PM
2

If she was conscious, and of the age of statutory consent, then consent can be presumed if she did not say no during the intercourse, and did not struggle. And don't try and spout nonsense about "there is no such thing as presumed consent". Look up the definition in the dictionary, as the term very much exists. You may also wish to educate yourself by reading The Sexual Offences Act 2003, and most specifically, Section 75. You may wish to also read this: http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/rape_a…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:34 PM
76

Yes, but people often change their minds, and if she didn't say stop, and let things go further, then it is presumed consent.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:20 AM
26

WHAT?! Are men meant to be mind readers?! If she wanted it to stop, why didn't she say so? Unless she verbally says stop, or tries to push him off her, then it is presumed consent. I think all/most women have been in a situation when the sex was less than comfortable and wanted it to end quickly/stop, but that is not rape, unless we actually say "stop" but it continues regardless. Also, I think many women have been in a situation where we only wanted a kiss and a cuddle, but one thing lead to an…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:11 AM
9

I've even been told that it's acceptable to ridicule and belittle women and girls with my shape to make big beautiful women feel better about themselves. Tell me about it! And do you know something? Women's problems with body image stem from OTHER WOMEN. I never believed it or realised it until recently. Now I realise that my issues stemmed from women more than they did from the male "ideal". When a woman is slim, it is other women who make life difficult for her - not the men. And yes, I can ce…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:29 AM
2

DV = Domestic Violence
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:23 AM
3

I wonder if a woman's union would have lost its funding...
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:30 AM
3

It's well known about. I can tell you're new to men's issues. I can recommend A Voice For Men. A lot of info there. I also learned a lot from debating men's issues on Twitter. Good luck.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:27 AM
13

Although I'm not an MRA (or at least don't like to tag myself), I am an egalitarian and humanist. I visit this subreddit and contribute in some discussions, as I am interested in the human rights aspect, which is something I am researching. I have to say, I have also experienced much hostility from my own gender, and the feminists who I have debated with really do not accept men's issues. They get really angry when I mention male rape and the myths surrounding DV. They won't even listen and tell…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:22 AM
2

Oh my! You just don't get it, do you?! Baptism is different to Anglican Christenings! Baptists don't have to be baptised at birth to be a Baptist. They can be baptised anytime during their lifetime, as the whole purpose of being baptised is to "wash away one's sins". Therefore, it can be down to an individual's own autonomy! Besides, even Christening a baby cannot be compaired to circumcision. Does a Christening harm a baby? - Erm, NO! Is the Christening central to being a Christian? NO! You can…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:52 AM
6

Because it should be THE CHILD'S CHOICE! Please get it through your heads once and for all, people! And nobody said anything about making your religion illegal; only circumcision. Just leave a child decide for himself - ok?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:49 AM
4

People in general are just idiots. Shock stories always "sell". That's why people read The Daily Fail and The Sun, and all its civilisation eroding content and sensationalised shit! Then some people get all excited if something just happens to feature a "bad woman", and post it all on this SR.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:18 AM
3

Great article! Thank you to the OP for posting. Back in my days of immaturity and lack of awareness as to the extent of male discrimination, I was dumped by my boyfriend at the time just for even considering joining an all-female gym. At the time I thought it was a complete overreaction, because thanks to feminist propaganda, failed to see the deeper issues. I'd never even heard of the word "misandry"! Translated into plain English, this means: feminists say a minority of women ‘feel’ bad about …
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:07 AM
7

Don't throw your cheap straw man argument at me, troll! Where did I say I wanted it driven underground? FGM is performed illegally, under less than sterile conditions, but making it illegal has reduced the number of girls being victim to the procedure. Incidentally, many ritual MGM are carried out under less than sterile conditions despite it being a legal procedure, as it is not funded by the NHS in the UK when performed for "non-therapeutic" purposes. Also, traditional circumcision ceremonies …
/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:20 PM
7

My dick feels just fine Good for you. It's a pity that the same can't be said about your morals. Let people do what they want, it's their lives, not yours. Yes, and it is the baby boys' lives; not their parents. What if your sons' circumcisions go wrong? Could you live with being an abuser? I feel sorry for your future sons.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 10:54 PM
1

At least society is slowly being made more aware of such women. That is one positive step towards guys protecting themselves, and society opening their eyes to the fact that women are not always so "gentile". The story is ranked high in [r/worldnews] (http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/199k8v/compulsive_liar_jailed_after_11_false_rape_claims/)
/r/MensRights26/02/13 09:41 PM
1

I retract my previous comment. dontcallmefaggot argues like a female feminist, alright! The r/user in question quoted Catharine MacKinnon at me (cringe).
/r/MensRights26/02/13 09:24 PM
1

Ah... I see your problem. It sounded like it was only you who was abroad, and that she was living away from you. I do fully understand your problem about not being able to forget the things that happened. Been there too, and I know it is difficult to trust others after being treated so abysmally. My way of getting around my ex attempting to ruin my life at the end of the relationship (some kind of bitter revenge for not giving him 100% of my attention when I was depressed, unwell, and insanely b…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:57 PM
4

That's the problem. When one is in that state of mind, they don't really know what they would do if they were not in that situation, because they cannot imagine anything any other way at that point. It eats into you.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:36 PM
3

I second the yoga suggestion!
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:34 PM
1

Seriously, faggot, I'm bored of this now. I'm not even going to read your comment.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:29 PM
2

I sometimes worry that my ex thinks that I was abusive and violent, when in fact a lot of it was contrived, because he said he liked strong, controlling women. Strong, yes, I am. And I can have moments where I want control (but don't we all to a point??), but I admit I may have gone to far with the act. Maybe that was the case with your ex, too? Sometimes a person doesn't mean harm, but doesn't realise just how far they're going, or how careless/tactless they are being with words. Have you tried…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:03 PM
15

The more that men speak out about this issue, the more awareness there will be, and the more likelihood there will be that the procedure will be banned. So, please keep speaking up, chaps! Make your voices heard loud and clear. Alas, making MGM illegal will not prevent the practice all together, as it will instead be driven underground in the case of ritual practices, which is currently the situation with regards parents taking their girls abroad for FGM. But at least making it illegal would be …
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:41 PM
2

Geez...! Let's hope these chicks don't get hold of the Lulu App, or guys will be doomed! - And I'm not even joking.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:59 PM
0

an assault on human dignity, i.e. places a person in a submissive, demeaning role designed purely for the sexual enjoyment of the other gender If it is freely consented to, then it is not "an assault on human dignity". Pornographic actresses/actors and models give their consent. Not only do they consent, but they also actively choose to do it for a career! You're not making any sense. Your comments remind me of some of the arguments presented by people in [this article] (http://livingonaslippery…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:47 PM
0

My god, you really cannot read, can you?! You can't come up with an argument, so you make up a random ad hominem fallacy. And lying by saying that I hadn't come up with sources, just because you hadn't bothered to read, is absolutely pathetic! I'm not going to type another word to you. You're a waste of my time.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 10:42 AM
0

Or maybe just a desire for clarification, so that the discussion can be centered on something specific? Providing sources is just good etiquette in an online debate. Ah ha! PROOF that you didn't read properly! I did produce a source! The Huffington Post article also linked to several other sources, too! I really cannot take someone seriously when they try to argue without at least attempting to read properly. It just reveals how closed minded and set in their ways they are, and I refuse to conti…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 10:28 AM
0

Porn is often, but not always, sexist, in the sense that it can be full of incredibly degrading and objectifying imagery of women, made for the titillation of men. Interesting. So, porn featuring men, or male strippers who perform for the titillation of women, is not sexist? To repeat my last point, if it features both women AND men, then it is not sexist. It is only sexist if porn only featured women OR men. And if you live in the part of the UK I grew up in, you'd know just how much women obje…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 10:23 AM
0

I read somewhere that France is generally considered a feminist country. I see what is meant by that now... Bloody hell!
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:12 AM
1

She should watch [this] (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JHnMyiWNk4) (Also linked to in my earlier post) That would give her something to write about! As you say, it's just humour! Deal with it.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:00 AM
1

Oh, for goodness sake! That's just the nature of comedy. It will always poke fun at people in some way or another, and will target all kinds of people - not just one gender, or nationality, etc., and an attempt to appeal to all types of humour. It will always cross the line between humour and insult for certain groups/subgroups that a joke might be about. Just take it with a pinch of salt and learn to laugh at oneself, when one is a member of a particular group of people being made fun of! There…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:46 AM
0

But it does suggest skepticism, or an attempt to discredit someone if they cannot provide adequate sources to substantiate their argument. Otherwise why ask for sources for such a famous advertisement?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:07 AM
0

I must admit that I have also argued with a number of males who use emotional/angry statements. Not nearly as often as women, I must add, but there are many males who have used abusive language and have supplied absolutely no facts/evidence to substantiate their illogical arguments. It would appear that literary trash is in no way gender specific.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:27 AM
1

Well, it has to be said that /u/stopsayingfaggot argues more in a male style (if that makes sense?), so I suspect the person is a male feminist. The alias suggests a gay man, or an effeminate male, or a TG/TS. Next I'll be accused of discriminating against gays/TGs/TSs because I made such a connection! Incidentally, when I see the word faggot, gay is the last word I think of. I first think of the really disgusting type of meat ball that is a Welsh delicacy (called a Faggot), or Fagotto (A bassoo…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:32 PM
0

Sorry, man. I clearly need to check up on the rules again. I forgot that rule, so my apologies.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:09 PM
1

Rule: "Links to subreddits with <30k subscribers must be to posts >24h old." Oops! Looks like I need to do my homework and read up on the Reddit rules! Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:05 PM
0

I noticed! ;)
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:01 PM
0

Are you kidding me? It was borderline pornographic. And is porn sexist?! When modelling/pornography is consented to at liberty, and not confined to one gender, it is not sexist. The modelling and pornographic industries do not exclude or feature any one gender. It would only be sexist if it did! And for being incredibly condescending and rude, making belittling comments, referring to someone as "sweetie" and "sweetheart", calling people liars and hypocrites I call everyone sweetie. It's a term o…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:49 PM
0

Exactly my point during the course of the argument! But they didn't see it that way. Their argument was "only if she's good looking".
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:38 PM
2

You didn't read the posts requesting that I provide sources, then!
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:34 PM
-1

Deleted?! Last time I looked, it was still on there. Perhaps that was the reason - I don't know what was going through their heads. But the advert really wasn't that sexist at all. I really cannot see how that was such an issue of priority. My impression was that I was being down voted for saying that men were objectified, as I was being pressed for sources to the Diet Coke ad, only to be down voted further for suggesting Google!
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:32 PM
1

I agree, incidentally. Objectification isn't always something negative. Some people actually WANT to be objectified. And that is their good right if they want that. In that respect, a woman can get what she wishes, and even make a living out of it through modelling, television appearances, escort work, etc. In that respect, it liberates women! I think feminists who scorn at objectification of OTHER women through the media, are very often bitter in many respects. The fact that it is ok for FEMEN …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:18 AM
2

Is this not female objectification of men? [The new Diet Coke ad] (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2013/01/28/diet-coke-commercial-andrew-cooper_n_2566763) [Roger Federer Lindt ad] (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NChuiwwpr6Q)
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:56 AM
-6

"Calm down, dear..."
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:29 AM
-2

At the time of planning and carrying out an attempt you do genuinely feel that you want to die. In your case, and many others, I am not disputing. But, there are also many who slit their wrists only deep enough to bleed a little, but not actually die from it, purely for attention seeking purposes. I know of both men and women who have done this to prevent a partner from leaving them. Think about it, anyone who is even contemplating suicide isn't in a particularly rational or lucid place. I agree…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:16 AM
-5

I'm referring to this, sweetheart: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:05 AM
-5

My apologies if you feel it was targeted at you, but can assure you that I was not talking about you specifically. I was actually referring to women in this instance, as fewer women commit suicide, but oddly enough, more women attempt it! Not everything is about oneself, remember; and the world does not revolve around any one person. ["An attempted suicide is not really an attempt at suicide in about 95 percent of cases. It is a different phenomenon. It's most often an effort to bring someone's …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:39 AM
1

Are you the mod in charge of Men's Rights on Twitter, by any chance...?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:42 AM
-5

It's all part of their attempt at attention seeking. In a way I pity them, and in a way it annoys the hell out of me, too.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:37 AM
1

["An attempted suicide is not really an attempt at suicide in about 95 percent of cases. It is a different phenomenon. It's most often an effort to bring someone's attention, dramatically, to a problem that the individual feels needs to be solved. Suicide contains a solution in itself"] (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm)
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:36 AM
3

No, it's not that easy. And there is a lot of ignorance in the medical profession on how to deal with mental health problems.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:12 AM
1

Glad to read the attempt failed, and sorry to learn of your mental health issues. Seriously, suicide just isn't worth it. It gets better - hang in there!
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:10 AM
5

Thank you. We don't need people posting pro-suicide comments here (or anywhere else!)
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:38 AM
1

My friend has actually said he's stopped trying to punish her, because whenever he does it sounds like she's dying from abuse and he can't do it in public without making a scene. As a result, she completely runs the house... That is precisely why women (and even some feminine men!) do it! Most people give in to them, rather than deal with the embarrassment in public, and the constant aggravation. It's easier to give in to them. My family just left me scream on and make a total exhibition of myse…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:11 PM
1

It's a massively successful publication and has the most visited newspaper/media website in the world. Wrong. The Sun is the most popular/most widely read paper. http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/combined-printonline-figures-make-sun-most-read-title but it has massive influence and reach. False equivalence. The Daily Mail is a tabloid paper; not a quality (broadsheet) paper. It is merely very poor "pop" journalism, and it is a complete non sequitur to suggest reliable journalism based upon its popul…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:56 PM
18

Innocent until proven guilty, chaps. Firstly, this is a Daily Fail article, so take what that paper writes with a pinch of salt. The paper is considered a joke in the UK. I checked other news sources, which stated that the mother is missing, and they are searching for her. At the moment, she is suspected of murdering the 3-kids. Nothing is certain yet. For all we know, it could be the husband who did it, and is blaming his wife! Or maybe someone else murdered the children, and kidnapped the wife…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:08 AM
2

Lol! This certainly gave me a good laugh, alright! Then I realised it just HAD to be satire. Nobody could seriously be that stupid!
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:52 AM
2

It does appear that many seem to get their way when they throw a tantrum, unfortunately. I think that's why they do it. It really is quite pathetic. That said, women are taught that it is "unladylike" to show aggression, and often women cry out of anger, rather than upset. I know when I'm angry, my eyes will tear. It's the female method of self-control, if you can call it that. However, too many women use their "tears of frustration" as I call them, to make people think they're upset and take pi…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:36 PM
3

He-Man kicks ass and She-Ra kicks ass, and they're kicking ass together". Exactly! You don't see much of that in cartoons these days, sadly.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:02 AM
2

I agree completely. I've noticed that boys who grow up without a father present or whose fathers are rarely around, tend to pick up more feminine traits. However, I do also know of a number parents who do an excellent job of bringing up their kids as a single parent.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:53 AM
2

WHAT?!!!! I don't know where in the country you were brought up, but that was one misandrous school you must have attended!
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:44 AM
6

That's probably why I'm an egalitarian. Grew up watching She-ra and He-man. It gave the message that women were strong, and worked together with men. She-ra was He-man's female equal. But, it's all changed now...
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:42 AM
3

Boys who wear dresses and make tea are laughed at, or celebrated. I celebrate them!
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:36 AM
3

Some people are very heavy sleepers, so it is possible to have sex with someone whilst they are asleep, and they may wake up thinking they just dreamed the whole thing. If people can sleep walk or have no recollection of having had a conversation with someone in the room whilst they are asleep (trust me, that does happen!), then unconscious sex is also a possibility for some.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:59 AM
2

I suppose if someone has explicitly consented to being "raped" whilst asleep, it might come under sadomasochism. Then it might be legal under some jurisdictions (such as countries like Germany and Netherlands) where sadomasochism is legal. In the UK, it would be a complicated issue,as sadomasochism is generally held as being illegal under R v Brown (but not under the earlier case of R v Donovan),as is sex with a person who is unconscious.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:31 AM
2

Yes, everyone should be able to respect a person's wishes when they say no. Actually, any form of non-consensual touching in a non-sexual capacity could be regarded, prima facie unlawful, and therefore an act of battery - no mattet how benevolent. If a person does not consent, then it could be potentially unlawful. However, I doubt the law would charge a husband for kissing his wife, unless she refused and he aggressively persisted. As for the matter of giving a spouse's butt a little pinch; it …
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:56 AM
8

I had never really noticed how ridiculous feminists were until I started watching some of their rants on YouTube, a year ago. When I read this blog, I realised the writer sums up the general mentality of so many feminists perfectly: Infantile! That's why I decided to submit the link. At least blog posts on most men's rights blogs, such as aVfM, are more maturely written.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:18 AM
4

True!
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:08 AM
7

Well, admittedly, she was also referring to left-wing men in general, such as George Galloway, who is definitely not a feminist, and feminists claim he is sexist because in defence of Julian Asange said on the subject of having sex with a sleeping woman the night after having consensual sex with her: “It might be really bad sexual etiquette but whatever else it is, it is not rape.” I wouldn't say Galloway's comment is sexist/misogynistic; just extremely ignorant. Rape is a gender-neutral assault…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:51 AM
33

'It turns out that when I’m polite, it has an incredibly devastating effect on my emotional wellbeing. As you may have noticed, I shout and swear. It’s kind of cathartic for me, rudeness. When I bottle it up, the anger turns inward, leaving me anxious and close to tears with frustration. I dwell, and it’s fucking horrible for me. I’m not quite silenced, but restrained, and it eats away at me.' Such a reaction is reminiscent of a child throwing a tantrum when she doesn't get what she wants. A com…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:08 AM
1

She did. But her words are better suited to text. Just saying.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:58 PM
1

The NHS is far from perfect. In fact, it is in a serious mess with the current government. But the system works, and could still work very well with an intelligent strategy implemented. Problems at the moment also stem from the ridiculous number of time wasters using it for free pain killers, foreign patients using it for freebies and to give birth to their 6 kids before moving back to their own countries, and too many administrators employed for a one-person job, which all drains financial reso…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 06:11 AM
1

No, because left-wing is SUPPOSED to be about rights for EVERYONE.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:50 AM
0

Well, I'm a left-winger, and agree with her points, despite her lack of charisma. Pity she didn't publish her speech in writing though. Her face and voice is better suited to writing...
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:05 AM
1

No... It's because we pay National Insurance contributions with our taxes!
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:03 AM
0

I agree. What always amuses me is that feminists never seem to realise that paternity leave would also be of BENEFIT TO MOTHERS, as it would take the strain off the child care! New mothers always complain about feeling tired... Well, there's another argument for why men should have paternity leave, so they can help all the mothers out there. So we DO need a man, it seems! ;)
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:00 AM
2

I think the problem in the US is resource allocation. Some states are wealthier than others, and some are larger than others which would mean the more prosperous States with fewer people living in poverty would probably receive better access to the more costly treatments, as there would be "more money in the funding pot", so to speak. Same problem in the UK, but at least here is is more of a "postcode lottery" confined to district (or more appropriately, a local NHS Trust), as opposed to it bein…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 11:52 PM
1

I live in the UK, where we have free healthcare under the NHS, and can certainly argue with a few of your points. Yes, I agree that people abusing the system can be a problem, especially when people use it for "healthcare tourism" for cancer treatment or a transplant they cannot afford in their own country. But that could easily be changed, if the government would implement a scheme where people could only have access to free NHS treatment if they have been resident in the UK for say, 5 or 10 ye…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 11:29 PM
-1

You said it, mate. You're making no sense.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 09:43 AM
0

You'd know all about that.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:37 AM
2

Maybe so, but I am hardly likely to want to shame my entire gender, when I am a member of that gender myself.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:42 AM
3

I'm not really ashamed of my gender. It is merely an exaggerated figure of speech.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:07 AM
2

"Hooper revealed how in fact the pair had gone to his home from the pub, began kissing and “it just happened” adding that she didn’t say yes or no." You heard it here first, chaps! - Get her consent in writing! The sad thing is, it is coming to the point where we almost need to get consent in writing. And as ludicrous as that seems in itself, the worst part is that not even that could save a person from a rape allegation, as someone could always claim the consent was given "under duress". Some p…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 12:59 AM
0

False equivalence. But since you ask, yes, I would. It is not normal to be that fearful, unless there is a justified risk (I.e. living with/near a rapist). To be that fearful suggests suspicion and misandry.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:10 PM
2

I can most certainly see the difference. But there are a few blokes on here who say "women".
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:17 PM
1

People who have a problem with "most are not" statements can't face the truth. The fact is there are some "bad" people out there of both genders. Not all are "bad", and not all are "good". Fact.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:16 PM
2

Right... He said "girls". I don't want to know!!
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:13 PM
9

Not many women are 90lbs...!
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:15 AM
9

I just said similar, and then read your comment! :) It's a bloody insult to our gender. It makes us look like weak, calculating, scrounging bitches.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:12 AM
6

I'm a woman and I feel insulted by this photo. I refuse to live off ANY man, thank you.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:11 AM
1

Demoralisation happens to us all from time to time, no matter how strong we are. What matters is that we keep going. There is always light at the end of the tunnel... (Until death approaches)
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:01 AM
6

I guess women are perceived as being "delicate little flowers" all too often. Most women seem to like that. I can't stand it. It fools society into seeing women as something that they not, and also makes us all look fragile. Little story: a large, middle-aged man on the verge of a heart attack (seriously!) asked me between his heavy panting if I needed help with my very large bag, which I was not even struggling with, just because I'm female. I asked him if he needed help with his! - He seriousl…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:39 AM
2

You're right in that it gives a negative association. But the fact is, there are some negative people out there. Criminals do exist. Rapists do exist. Whores do exist. Therefore, saying "most X are not Y" is actually more of a statement of fact, albeit a negative association. Shit happens.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:19 AM
4

Maybe. But like I said earlier, NOT all would! But maybe I only speak for myself.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:13 AM
3

The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence...
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:12 AM
3

If it's that hard to look past it, then the problem lays with you and the sort of women you choose. Maybe get some counselling to get past what happened, and in future look look for a different "type". It is only certain subgroups who are "bad".
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:09 AM
2

Or how would it sounds if some man said "most women are not whores Actually, it doesn't bother me. I don't see a problem in the statement, as it's true: most women are not. Nothing misogynistic in that. What would be, would be to say that "most are". Now that would be a problem.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:05 AM
4

There's a lot of truth to that!
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:43 AM
1

There is less of such support, sadly. However, it is out there. Not all women are bad.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:42 AM
10

I think the problem with regards the comment "men commit most sexual assaults" is more to do with society's ignorance, than misandry, per se. Sadly, misinformation and ignorance can lead to hatred such as misandry. Either way, the problem is that the crime stats do currently correlate to the suggestion that "more men rape than women do", and until more men come forward and report being raped by women, then nothing will change. I found this quote interesting: "I was on the hunt to expose bad men,…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:39 AM
14

I don't believe this is real. No way!
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:47 AM
3

Great to see that the medical profession are taking male DV seriously by publishing this. However, one thing concerns me regarding the issue of 'the violence was consensual'. Where would BDSM fit into this? It is all well and good saying that as long as the submissive person consents, then it is ok; but what about when that person does not and the dominant person mistakingly believes that it is part of the role play? The other issue is, it may plant the idea in the mind of the sub, that the domi…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 08:10 PM
3

The problem with this case is that the abuser was merely a child herself in the eyes of the law. Nothing can be done. And even if she were an adult at the time of the abuse, it would not be considered sexual assault, unless she touched him inappropriately on his genitals. Spanking could be considered actual bodily harm, however. We cannot dwell on this particular case, given that the abuser was herself a minor. However, had the abused been a little girl, I am sure the abuser (had she been an adu…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:18 AM
2

I guess a husband wearing a frilly French Maid's outfit, and fiddling with a "broomstick", is enough of a "reward" in itself... ;) "Desperate Househusbands"...?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:26 PM
1

Yeah... Perfect if you're a bit gay!
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:15 PM
2

Well, there is only one solution chaps... Find a chick who is infertile! So that basically means a woman who has had a hysterectomy, or has PCOS, or an anorexic (that will only cause only temporary infertility, though... Until she gains weight.), or a thyroid problem, or iron overload (again temporary infertility if early stages). No doubt I'll get down voted for this post, but it's a good solution... :)
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:02 PM
3

"...carried the women away, kicking and screaming." Geez... And feminists reckon women are degraded by men. These women are DEGRADING THEMSELVES! What person with any element of class, would allow themselves to be carried kicking and screaming like squealing piglets, complete with her "udders" dangling all over the place? I'd be ashamed if I were those women!
/r/MensRights27/01/13 02:25 AM
8

Exactly! There is a REASON for why there are fewer women in such professions. They didn't get there from studying a degree in Gender Studies!
/r/MensRights27/01/13 02:20 AM
1

And you'll never be a man if you don't learn how to spell moustache...
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:17 PM
5

I also question if the high divorce rates, child support costs, and increasing unemployment rates, combined with Welsh women being more likely to have larger families than their counterparts in Southern England, is also a factor. (I.e. more children for men to support during difficult circumstances.)
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:23 AM
1

Incidentally, men are brutally raped in India, too. After all, homosexuality is scorned upon in India, and any man who society believes may be gay, can be victim to violence and even rape.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 02:12 AM
1

Have you seen the crime figures?! And men are rape victims too.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:02 AM
11

What is this thread about? - 1950's America?! The claims in this article are not modern day statistics. Also, who conducted the study, and how many prisoners were white, black, etc. There are no mentions of ethnic minorities/majorities with regards prisoner ethnicity. This is a terrible link, and quite obviously posted and written by a Republican racist. Shame on you, OP!
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:36 AM
1

Maybe. Maybe not. There are lots of different Modrons if you Google the name. I will leave you to guess which one of the several Modrons my alias is named after. :)
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:40 PM
1

As a woman myself, I can tell you quite honestly that eating disorders are more about competition amongst other women. There are men who like all shapes and sizes, so being ultra skinny is not about attracting men. It is about competing with other women for the modelling contracts, and slimmest appearance, and status, etc. men compete with each other for wealth, whilst women compete for being the thinnest/most attractive.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:32 PM
2

I'm sorry to hear about your eating disorder issues. It can be difficult for women, so dread to think how incredibly difficult it is for men. The percentage of eating disorders amongst men, I believe, is probably just as high as it is with women. The difference is, they are too ashamed to talk about it. Also, a high percentage of men with eating disorders suffer with "bigorexia" which very few have heard of. A large number of men are damaging their kidneys with excessive amounts of creatine supp…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:23 PM
7

She is making women look like the only victims, for one, and making men look like the baddies who have no issues themselves. So, yes, she is harming others. She is contributing to the misandry towards men. She is contributing to giving men a bad name. She is contributing to making other women hate men and making other women believe that men have it all, whilst only women have such issues. Men's issues are not given a second thought, and are merely brushed off because "only women are victims". It…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 02:04 AM
4

Alas, I fear you're right about that.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:08 AM
2

I bet!
/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:57 AM
2

Indeed, but someone needs to put these idiots straight once and for all.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:57 AM
1

If we start posting something every time it mentions a woman doing something fucked up to a man, not only are we going nowhere because most of us know it happens and it's not a novel issue Oh, and the other posts here are different?! They all have a whining element to them. but we look like we are actively seeking out to validate a distrust in women, something we scorn the feminists for doing Isn't that what everyone here is trying to do? I admit there can be a lot of propaganda on a large sub-r…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:38 AM
1

Not this week. Ask me next week.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:17 PM
0

No need to tell me that, sweetie. I would recommend that you keep reminding yourself of that, however.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:34 PM
-1

Did I say that is how they did, doll?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:31 PM
1

Generalisation. I think a professional female shot putter would be somewhat better at throwing than the average male.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:30 PM
2

Of course I'm a pussy, because I have one. What are you...? Well, it takes a pussy to recognise a dick, I guess.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:27 PM
1

Men didn't choose; they were conscripted. Different story.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:23 PM
-2

Nice red herring!
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:24 PM
-1

Firstly, no war is "just". War is organised murder, and being fearful of murder or being murdered is not weakness - it is more a matter of morality and survival instinct combined. Secondly, choosing to fight in a war isn't strength, either. It is stupidity, if not aggression.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:17 PM
-4

Qué...? Lol! Incidentally, I'm neither "offened" or offended. I was merely challenging the statement, doll.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:09 PM
9

I think it's both! Point is, imagine if roles were reversed. Men would have received a harsher sentence.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:20 AM
2

And men are not victims of crime and crazy ex girlfriends?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:30 AM
3

I've heard about plenty of women too who were the victims of crime due to shitty police work. I know, and I pretty much said that above. However, my point is, had the police done their job "properly", would a woman have been subjected to so much stalking? There are men who are prosecuted after just ONE text message to a woman if it is considered "sinister", when that would not be considered so much of an issue if a woman sent the same to a man.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:18 AM
-3

Says he who has just thrown propositional and quantification fallacies! Tu quoque, my friend! ;)
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:05 AM
11

Because it is the story of a guy (and his mother) being targeted by a woman, and lack of protection. Usually, it is the women who claim to be victims, whereas the guy is clearly a victim here, too. But the article only focuses on the women, really, and no mention about how the ex-boyfriend must feel as a result of being a victim. It is one thing to receive communication from an ex who wants to negotiate and talk about things that went wrong, etc., but messages of such a harassing nature are clea…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:50 AM
1

True. Regardless, it would be interesting to see them race each other. I only wish we could. They are both fantastic runners. Sadly Radcliffe is knocking on in age and physical health. Don't think we'll be seeing much more of her in athletics again... If at all.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:40 AM
-2

So I realised, which is why I have edited my comment. However, considering the distance and gender/size etc., the time difference and athletic ability is not exactly huge!
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:27 AM
-4

I guess that could be regarded fallacious. However, the point I am putting across is that gender by itself is not always a physical barrier, as there are other factors to consider such as height, age, general health, lifestyle, etc.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:53 AM
-1

It's actually quite easy to be a rebel. Not if you want to be accepted by society. Most people do; not necessarily by choice, but necessity to survive (finding a job, partner, etc.) do whatever you want, but that doesn't mean you're not living like a pussy. its called being a pussy for a reason. Talking from experience?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:47 AM
-5

There are women who are couch potatoes and unable to walk down stairs without gasping for breath, too. I am not disputing. I am just stating that women are not always athletically inferior. A marathon distance is standard; 26.2 miles. 'The IAAF world record for men is 2:03:38, set by Patrick Makau of Kenya on September 25, 2011 at the Berlin Marathon. The IAAF world record for women is currently 2:15:25, set by Paula Radcliffe of the United Kingdom on April 13, 2003 at the London Marathon.' Edit…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:40 AM
3

I'll give this an up-vote.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:28 AM
-3

Ultimately boys who adopt "female tendencies" are stronger for breaking away from social norms and the belief that "men should be men". What is a "real man", anyway? Why does being male mean the need to conform to a social norm? That is not being a man. Man = male. Male = male genitalia. Simple as that. A male should be able to adopt whatever persona he wishes, whether that be "macho" or "sissy", or anything else he wishes. I am sick of social norms, and the way people are considered "weak" for …
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:16 AM
1

Girls in school are not suspended for wearing pants or men's shirts the way boys who wear skirts ot school are. In the UK, girls at some schools are suspended for wearing trousers. Some Muslim girls are also suspended for wearing a hijab to school. I agree with just_a_label: too many comparisons that are so often not true.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:06 AM
3

Tomboys are not always looked down upon. Look at Lara Croft for another example. The only people who look down upon Tomboys are middle-aged women trying to behave "upper class"; or a "Tomboy" who is a middle-aged woman, and thus automatically assumed a "lesbian", or someone who has not grown old gracefully.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:01 AM
3

i'm copywriting it. you'll be hearing from my lawyer. Anything that is published is automatically assumed copyright within 30 days of publication if you reside within the Berne Union. As such, anything posted on the Internet is considered a publication, and automatically assumed copyright. As you're anonymous the copyright will expire in 50yrs. :p The Reddit lawyer has spoken! :p
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:37 AM
-6

True and false. There are very many men who are couch potatoes and unable to walk down stairs without gasping for breath, whilst there are women who can run marathons in little over 2hrs. The world marathon record between man and woman is only a few seconds difference!
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:29 AM
-6

So, being told "you throw like a girl" is an insult, because women a frail and pitiful, right...?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:26 AM
10

That still happens at some UK schools today! Private schools don't usually have an option for girls to wear trousers, and even some state schools disallow trousers. My Muslim friend had to wear thick leggings under her gym skirt because trousers were forbidden. Not that this is a men's issue, but just to add to your point.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:21 AM
13

But of course, the feminists will claim that there are two "victims"... The ex-girlfriend for being dumped by a MALE, and the mother for being run over because of her SON. (sigh)
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:57 AM
7

The joke is, feminists are playing hell at the moment about Page 3 in UK tabloid newspapers, and claim it is "misogyny". Yet, they are happy to flash their own naked breasts whenever it suits them, as they are doing so here. If anyone is misogynistic, it is the feminists themselves for their disgust of glamour models, and any attractive women who receives male attention. If men really hated women, they would not want to look at topless women! Let's face it, the feminists are a bunch of hypocrite…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:24 PM
0

Don't throw straw men fallacies at me, Sunny Jim! Neither of those videos prove that if the man is the victim the man gets arrested, as you initially claimed. You clearly have no clue what the law is yourself, and FYI, I know more about the law than half the lawyers out there, so spout your bullshit at someone else. If you want to be taken seriously, give me the names of legal cases where the man was arrested for being the victim.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:50 PM
1

if a man calls the police against a women abusing him they will arrest him Nonsense! The police will investigate, but it would be unconstitutional to arrest a victim.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:37 PM
1

as we've seen there seems to be complete protection afforded to the accuser. Not always. Many genuine victims find themselves the subject of gossip and "attention-seeking" allegations by peers, and also defense lawyers in Court.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:38 AM
-2

That's nonsense.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:34 AM
1

Sorry to read about your friend. I understand what your saying, as I am also on both sides of the fence. Problem is, too many men are wrongly accused of a crime (happened to a friend, and know how it can screw a person), but also a lot of genuine rape/sexual assault victims (both female and male victims) are not believed by their peers and end up stigmatised, which makes so many victims too afraid to report a sexual assault. The other problem is by going to the police to report it, it makes the …
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:47 AM
0

Well, your insulting comments and childish attitude has surely changed my stance on this! May I remind you who started this: YOU! You came trolling on this post and started this thread with the use of foul language, "it's a fucking meme". Thank you for being so mature and reasonable and providing adequate rebuttals and stances for your position. And your rebuttals were any more adequate and mature? Tu quoque! Your Red Herrings, Ad Hominem comments, and sarcasm are hardly what one could call a ma…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:09 AM
0

Ha! Probably because all the feminists have been on here voting, sweetie. Go back to your feminist forum and troll there instead.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:13 AM
0

Could have fooled me, there. I'm an egalitarian, too, but support the MRM over most of the feminist missions. In the West, women are at an advantage over men in very many ways. But I do support the feminists with regard their protests for women in Islamic countries, for example. Oh, fabulous. I'll sign up for gender reassignment surgery first thing on Monday, then.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:07 AM
-1

That's amusing, since I'm actually a female myself. Unlikely I would hate my own gender, although women like you make me question whether I should have a sex change.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:55 AM
0

Don't throw red herrings at me, doll. Incidentally, if you look further you will see that I have posted into politics, not that I need to justify why I post here. Have you never heard of research, honey bun? People use Reddit for learning more about a topic, as well as protesting. Your comment only goes to show your moronic narrow mindedness. That said, I do support the MRAs, and your comments remind me why.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:50 AM
0

Ha! You know full well how you feminists cry "misogyny" about everything!
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:39 AM
0

Like hell women haven't raised a stink! You have been caught telling a blatant lie there.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:37 AM
0

I'm not disputing. But it's still misandry, meme or not!! If this said "Stab her!", there would be women crying misogyny right, left, and centre. That is the issue here, and not that it's a "fucking meme". I am talking about the double standard in political correctness.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 02:56 AM
31

It reminds me of Harriet Harman's misandrist statement that Labour's top two positions should always be held by women because "men cannot be left to run things on their own". http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8180195.stm I said the same: the position should be bestowed upon the most qualified and most politically experienced, and not based upon gender!
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:29 AM
1

Not saying I agree, either. But it also doesn't seem a completely unrealistic idea.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:58 AM
2

That's strange, because a relative of mine is a single dad after being awarded sole child custody by the courts. I don't think the mother pays child support, but my cousin certainly gets all the benefits going. In fact, he doesn't even need to work, as he gets enough from benefits, allowing him to dedicate all his time to the child and to study/train for his chosen profession. Perhaps times have changed...? Sorry to read about your experience, man. That sucks badly! :(
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:54 AM
2

Bullshit, yes it is. Horrible death, no. Like Pecanpig suggests, remove them from their position, and forbid them from expressing their poisonous opinions.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:58 PM
1

Dolphins tend to swim in groups, so it does not seem so unlikely that they also have a kind of instinctive social belief amongst them, too.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:55 PM
1

I believe you're right. It assumes that men believe they have a right to dominate and control women. Nobody has that right, unless a person consents to being dominated and controlled, which strangely enough, some people do (i.e. BDSM, etc.)
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:53 PM
2

Never mind the inequality faced by male victims of rape, eh? http://livingonaslipperyslope.com/2012/09/10/the-silent-victims-of-male-rape/
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:01 AM
11

That's a different matter. These women seem to be talking about doing it just for the sheer hell of it.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:51 AM
4

This is an absolute disgrace! - I'm not surprised you're angry, man! This is sick, and nothing less than a sexual assault. It could also warrant a GBH charge if it causes long term damage. Just imagine the outrage if a man said that about a woman's intimate area! And believe me, being a woman myself, I know there would be an almighty furore from women everywhere. So, why should guys take this kind of shit? Simple answer: You shouldn't have to. Nobody should kick anyone, unless it's a genuine sel…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:45 AM
-2

Yes, it's a generalisation; but an accurate generalisation!
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:35 AM
-1

Well, there's nothing aggressive about this post. It's just a little humour, so I can't see the logic as why it might be removed.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:31 AM
1

I wouldn't call cuddles and kissing on par with "standard friendship". I'd certainly never passionately kiss a friend, and cuddling intimately is also a no-go! If you do those things, you have some pretty intense "friends", dude!
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:22 AM
2

This is absolutely unbelievable! I'm trying to find cases in the UK on this subject. Not found anything as yet. Anyone know of any British cases? In the UK, a woman cannot be charged with rape, because the definition of rape in the UK is 'penetration of the vagina or anus', so such child support cases like this could certainly occur in the UK, hypothetically speaking. :(
/r/MensRights30/11/12 10:46 AM
2

I was thinking the same. This could all be made up, for all we know. All purely hearsay.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:58 AM
1

Good Lord!! That's horrible. I see what you mean. Despite all I've read and researched, I'd not encountered that ritual. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:52 AM
1

Public and state schools. Some public schools also insist that girls wear skirts, long socks, and straw hats!
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:51 AM
1

Do you have a source for this information? I've not heard of penises being sliced open deliberately as part of a circumcision ritual.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:43 AM
1

Exactly!
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:23 AM
2

Even if a man had no penis, I wouldn't have a problem with him as a partner, so long as we were intellectually and emotionally compatible. Seriously, not all women dispose of men, and not all associate masculinity with penises and sex, etc. There is so much more to live for. Also, there are some really good counsellors out there, who can really help you talk through your issues. Sometimes we just need to talk to someone who won't judge us, just to get all of our issues out of our system and help…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:20 AM
2

Not all women want an active sex life, you know. Some just want intelligent conversation, cuddles, and companionship.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:02 AM
1

Here, here! Strangely enough, the biggest troll I've encountered on here is a MRA! Surely such hostile behaviour goes against what we're all aiming for? - a mature debate and peaceful protest where voices can be heard, without sounding shrill?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:51 AM
1

I'm not even going to start reading anything else you write. Well, you're reading this! So, that was a blatant lie. Let's face the truth, shall we? - I am just too clever for you, and you know I've presented my case better than you can. Except, you're too small minded and pathetically infantile to accept when you're in the wrong, or to contribute anything of interest to the debate. Ironically, bigoted specimens such as yourself, only go to prove feminists right on certain matters. Shame on you! …
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:03 PM
1

As mentioned above, it has already been proven to be a flawed study!
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:11 PM
-2

No, it was in context, because men always bring up how FGM is illegal as their argument. I was pointing out that it is not really comparable to base it as an argument for making male circumcision illegal. Too many men don't understand exactly what FGM entails. They think it is just the female equivelant of having the foreskin taken (such as a clitorectomy), so I was clarifying. The reason it should be illegal is because of a breach of the boy's human right to autonomy.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:04 PM
1

Lol! What a special little sausage, you are. That is your excuse to not answer? What a pathetic coward. The perfect example of Tu Quoque, in fact, lies with you, my dear. Is this also your excuse not to answer in a mature and intelligent manner? Do please take note that you have not addressed the issue either, and instead turn your own accusation back at me. A stinky Red Herring is at large! - Perhaps I should devour you smoked. As for me being a "pathetic coward", oh, what a sweet smell of hypo…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:39 PM
0

Now unless you have an answer to the challenge from my last comment, don't bother answering at all. In other words you have nothing of value to contribute, so you're running away. "Concern trolling" Is that not a contradiction in terms?! Politicians and governments may not be the cause, but it is they who are the legislators, and thus it is they who men need to target if we want things like circumcision laws changed, and laws on child custody. Do you realise that women have an automatic right to…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:19 AM
1

That is very true. But that has always been the case. Religiously speaking, it has been used to make boys and girls "chaste".
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:01 AM
1

FGM is, admittedly, quite different though. It does not in any way excuse male circumcision though. For example, too many think female circumcision is just removal of the clitoral hood or a clitorectomy. In actual fact, a number of different types of mutilations have been included under the broader category of female “circumcision.” Some groups have practiced a deliberate elongation of the clitoris and labia minora-from artificial, mechanical manipulation, reaching lengths as long as 10 cm. Some…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:25 AM
5

Those are the "facts" of a flawed study! Go and do some more research.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:01 AM
4

The issue is not about risk. The issue is about the abhorrent lack of autonomy. The risk would not even occur if boys were not subjected to this unnecessary procedure without their consent.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:33 AM
2

Seriously, women in a gym changing room = not a pretty sight! Sweaty Betty!
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:28 AM
6

I agree. If you don't ask; you don't get. Besides, I've encountered male staff in changing rooms and toilets, countless times, and think nothing of it. In fact it would be SEXIST to disallow a male a cleaning job based upon the fact he's male and cleaning bathrooms/changing rooms, etc. Same with those female cleaners.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:24 AM
2

Yes. I've seen male cleaners in ladies toilets regularly.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:21 AM
4

In the poorest areas of India they do. This boy was obviously one of the wealthy in India, as he was receiving his surgery at a private hospital. The wealthy in India do not die of diarrhoea any more than the average US citizen who contracts E-coli.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:08 AM
3

Exactly! That's the point I'm trying to address with this link submission.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:05 AM
1

Bahahahahaha! The dig at feminism is not aimed at me, because I'm not a feminist, get it? I'm certainly not "crying" aggression, but just imagine how politicians view it! We're trying to stand up for a change in laws, amongst other things, so a good image is crucial.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:01 AM
1

Except I'm not a feminist. I'm on the side of the MRM, although consider myself more egalitarian.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:58 PM
8

Oh, right so that means parents also have the "moral right" to circumcise their kids, too? Nobody should have the right to go against a child's consent when it is against their best interests. Just because that's the way thing are, doesn't mean we should just accept it.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:49 PM
7

Because it's evidence that men are victims of rape just as much as women, which society needs to open their eyes to, so that men can get the same level of support as women have available to them.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:45 PM
1

Some schools in the UK do ban girls from wearing trousers! And they also ban boys from wearing shorts.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:38 PM
10

There's actually a lot of truth to that, sadly.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:37 PM
14

Check out this quote, too: 'The hospital administration assured the relatives of the boy that the hospital would bear the expenses of the boy's treatment.' That's good of them... </s> I believe it was probably an Islamic circumcision, as the names appear to be Islamic names. In which case, it's religion I direct my anger at most, although circumcision is, of course, not just a religious practice, but is one wrongly performed on way too many boys around the world.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:25 PM
1

involves such blatant exaggeration of terms. I could say the same with regards your remark about "concern trolling".
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:16 PM
1

I am not saying we should not condemn the feminists. We should! But there are less cheap ways of doing so than projecting their behaviour. We are classier than them, surely? "Mama bear" is only aggressive when children are in danger. Besides, we are humans; not bears, and humans are supposedly more civilised than the rest of the animal kingdom. Let's at least act like it. One can be assertive without coming across as aggressive. Aggression wins nobody's trust.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:14 PM
1

Emotion is one thing, aggression is another. If men want to be taken seriously as guardians for their children in custody cases, then appearing aggressive is the last image they should portray. Emotion can be expressed without aggression.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:05 PM
0

If a feminist wrote the comment you wrote, would you listen? No. It would merely antagonise, and do NOTHING to help their movement (which it does not.) May I suggest you learn some manners? That might actually help the MRM movement be taken a little more seriously by governments who currently have laws favouring women. Being aggressive and hostile will not change any politicians' minds.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:00 PM
-1

Precisely my point.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:56 PM
3

Why? - For the same reasons as women get angry about getting raped!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:58 PM
3

Just like a male's body is his body.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 09:34 AM
2

Problem with letting off steam, is that it can easily be misinterpreted as aggression. The MRM may not be about public image, but it still goes a long way in fighting for a cause. It's almost the same as a group of angry hippies, high on cannabis fighting for its legalisation. Nobody will listen to them because of the image they portray. Image goes a long way. Just like everyone expects a politician to look and act the part with a happy looking family, and dressed in a suit. Similar concept.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:42 AM
2

You're right, but I just don't think everyone throwing insults and abuse back at each other helps. All it succeeds in doing is making men look "aggressive" and gives the feminists even more ammunition and "proof" that they are "right". Men bashing the feminists also does nothing to persuade the government to change laws on things like child custody.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:19 AM
2

I know not all MRAs are men. I'm a woman myself, although I don't necessarily identify myself as an MRA necessarily. More an egalitarian (which I know MRAs claim they are, but the above link suggests otherwise). I'm not disputing that feminism asks for it, but bashing the feminists does not strengthen the MRAs cause! It has the complete opposite affect. Bash a person, and they'll run; not listen!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:02 AM
1

I know that, and I'm not conflating the two at all. I just don't think anyone should bash either movement, if we all want to get the point across. Just because feminists bash men, doesn't mean that men should bash feminists - as equal as that would be! Two wrongs won't make the case for men any easier - Trust me!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:50 AM
2

Hatred for anyone is counterproductive. Most feminists hate the MRA, and likewise, the MRA hate the feminists. I have no time for the hatred of either movement. The problem is both are out for self-gain. Both want some kind of power over the other. I'm not saying all feminists or MRAs are like that, but some undoubtedly do. We all know what feminists want... Control in every way. High pay, and babies; control over politics, etc. Some MRAs, for example, want control over abortion, etc., which unf…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:53 AM
1

True. But I'm just stating the law as it is supposed to be applied.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:40 AM
7

I'm a man?! I've got something missing if I am...! Lol!
/r/MensRights27/11/12 10:14 PM
0

Unproductive, yes. Hateful, no. It's just a joke, get over it! However, I do agree that poking fun of the other when trying to fight for equality, goes against the mission.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 10:13 PM
4

If it were a genuine self defence, and felt you were in serious danger, then law would excuse you on the grounds of self defence. Otherwise, it would be an assault.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 10:10 PM
1

Well reasoned responses is what we need more of. Anger and hostility does nothing to present your case.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 10:01 PM
-5

I agree. Bashing either movement to "get the message across" does nothing to help anyone, and does the complete opposite of what you're all striving for - which is supposedly equality. Making fun of the other does not equate to equality. You just lose your credibility instead.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:55 PM
-2

Are you on something...?!
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:51 PM
-3

You'd think so, but not everyone shares the same humour, and may see it as an ad hominem attack. It just gets peoples' backs up, and it does nothing to help your cause.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:47 PM
0

I'm a woman, and I dislike the modern feminist movement. I think the movement is unfair on men. We all have human rights regardless of gender. My dislike of the feminist movement, certainly does not mean I dislike women, as that would mean disliking my own gender, which is just crazy.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:43 PM
2

One thing I've learned is that not everyone has a sense of humour, or at least they do not share the same kind of humour. Humour is not the way to get the point across when pointing out issues, as people perceive it as an ad hom. The way to get a point across is without hostility, without aggression, and without a style of humour that pokes fun at flaws. It just gets up peoples' noses, and makes them shut their ears and minds, because they've already convinced themselves that you're an arsehole.…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:33 PM
0

Great attitude. (sarcasm)
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:27 PM
4

True. As I stated earlier, two wrongs don't make a right. The best way to get a point across is without hostility and insults. Also I discovered myself not that long ago, that not everyone has a sense of humour, and take jokes as a personal insult, when all one is trying to do is make a little light of a dark situation.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:26 PM
6

I can! :)
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:23 PM
8

True. If you want to get the message clear, insulting the other movement isn't the way to go. Feminists may insult men, but two wrongs don't make a right. Still a funny joke, though! (I'm allowed to say it. I'm female! :) )
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:22 PM
4

And you're saying that the feminists do not poke fun at men?? All women poke fun at men to some degree, just as men poke fun at women. Some of them are just jokes about the comparisons between the two, such as men complaining about women taking ages to get ready, and women's protest at men turning up late, etc. They are clichés that apply to both in many instances, but making fun is harmless, even of it is considered "sexist". Sometimes you feminists and MRAs take things to heart too much. Of co…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:15 PM
1

That's the issue: It is not, and should not be, a valid reason for either gender.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:28 AM
1

Precisely! It would be one massive witch hunt if it were a man. He would be labelled "scum of the earth". The fact is, any sex-offender, male or female, is equally as culpable, and should be dealt with equally by the justice system and society. Not that I am condoning people going around and beating up all alleged sex offenders, which is how men are often dealt with. That is equally as wrong.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:04 AM
1

That's a problem with Human Rights law, which states that everyone has the right to 'round a family'. That is a statutory right in all Human Rights Acts: See Articles 12 and 17 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Unfortunately there is no law for the right to be declined parenthood. Yet, there was nevertheless a UK case back in 2007, involving male prisoner, Kirk Dickinson, who was denied the right to fertility treatment, because the Court ruled he'd given up his right by committing a …
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:24 AM
6

"Because of this, I am a firm advocate of using irritants inside of a condom before disposing of it after sex. Every man should keep a bottle of hot sauce or something similar on his person just for that purpose. This measure will only harm the dishonest and immoral woman who would stoop to robbing a condom." LOVE IT!! LOL! :) And yes, it would only affect a dishonest woman, as you mention. An honest woman would not even dream of taking a used condom after the act. Also, I don't know about the U…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:11 AM
1

Yes. Case law quite often changes, so it is possible.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:52 AM
6

Damn! - Why didn't I think of that before! ;) (JOKE!!!)
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:06 AM
11

Phillips v Irons was in Illinois, so the same jurisdiction laws would not necessarily apply, as far as I'm aware, but may be considered by the Court, as it is similar case law. Certainly, Rape by Fraud is not recognised in Texas. A change of precedent is certainly in order.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:04 AM
11

Yes, I read about that. 'Rape by Fraud', is the offence. However, it is not recognised in all jurisdictions, and as far as my sketchy knowledge of US law goes, Texas does not recognise it. Under UK common law it might be recognised, based upon the case of R v Linekar (1994) where the Court pointed out the law on this subject has stood the test of time. To establish fraud in rape, it must be fraud as to the nature of the act itself, or as to the identity of the person who initiated the act; R v W…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 04:33 AM
3

I'm currently writing an article on circumcision, and I came across this exact same point elsewhere. Author, Patricia Robinett Eugene, also claimed that in her "experience": "I find sex with a circumcised male to be completely useless, whereas sex with an intact male works just fine." There may be a lot of truth in circumcised penises irritating the vagina, from what I have read.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 04:11 AM
8

The legal definition of rape varies between countries and states, but has to involve a non-consensual sexual ACT. In Texas, where this case occurs, the law is as thus (I just looked it up): Penal Code, Sec. 22.011.(a) creates the offence of sexual assault: (a) A person commits an offense if the person: (1) intentionally or knowingly: (A) causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent; (B) causes the penetration of the mouth of ano…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 03:59 AM
45

Sperm is property! Alas, the law considers the position very differently between different countries. In the UK, for example, sperm is legally recognised as property, following the case of Yearworth and Ors v North Bristol NHS Trust [2009], in which six men stored their sperm before undergoing chemotherapy treatment for cancer in case they proved to be infertile after the treatment. The sperm was not properly stored, and as a result was inadvertently destroyed. The men sued the NHS Trust that st…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 03:49 AM
11

I will second that. I am a woman and recognise the difficulties faced by men. I admit that some years ago, I did once think that MRAs were merely the male equivelant of feminists, who whined about their perceived injustices, in an attempt to gain power over the other gender. However, I readily changed my mind after studying/researching Law and Human Rights, etc. Whilst I agree that it is important to fight for your rights, it must not take over your life, and there really are women out who there…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 11:16 PM
1

That's a straw man, because I'm not saying that. You're saying it. Incidentally, from a female perspective, I find short men cute (but not Tom Cruise). A lot of very tall women like the opposite, and select not only men shorter than her, but short men, period!
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:09 PM
11

'...an article by Philip M. Sarrel and William H. Masters entitled “Sexual molestation of men by women” (Archives of Sexual Behavior 11 (2): 82–88), states that male erectile response is involuntary. Any physical contact or extreme stress can cause an erection and ejaculation, and does not imply desire or enjoyment. Women can initiate penetrative sex through stimulation of external male genitalia or the anus, and can force penetration of the anus with the use of foreign objects such as dildos, o…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:51 AM
2

There's a related article to this issue, here: http://livingonaslipperyslope.com/2012/09/10/the-silent-victims-of-male-rape/
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:48 AM
1

True. They really are a special breed!
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:42 AM
2

"In the world of push-up bras and makeup, I don't feel the least bit guilty." LOVE IT!!! :) And no need to be ashamed of 5ft7... Tom Cruise is doing well for himself with the laaaaaaydies!
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:41 AM
3

I think short guys are cute!
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:36 AM
-1

I don't think short men are discriminated against more than overweight women, at all. How many cars drive past a short man walking on the pavement, hurling abuse at him for being short? Yet, that is what fat women get if a car of lads drives past her on the pavement: hooting horns and abuse such as "fatty", etc. Also look at how overweight women are discriminated more in the workplace than short men. Look at how many short Japanese and Chinese businessmen, are striking massive business deals eve…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:26 AM
1

Showing female breasts is not misogyny. Remember, misogyny is a hatred of women. If you hated women, it would be unlikely that you would have any interest in their breasts.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:11 PM
3

Exactly! Funnily enough, the only other papers to report the story other than the Daily Fail, are also not worth kitty-litter!
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:12 PM
1

If you haven't got a surrogate mother or a woman prepared to go through a full pregnancy, then yes, a male would need to wait for science. With regards nature, "it takes two to tango", as they say!
/r/MensRights16/09/12 05:41 PM
2

It's not claiming that pregnancy is the only factor, if your read the article. It claims that women cannot have it all ways, and that to establish equality they need to make the exact same choices as men.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 05:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter