TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ModsAreThoughtCops Archive

View 0 posts and 440 comments by ModsAreThoughtCops on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Either way, too hot or too cold or even perfect weather, nobody should leave anything with a pulse in a car for 5 hours while they play slots. Always a tragedy when a young life is lost in this manner, he is lucky to have lived. But very unlucky with who his mother is.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 12:15 AM
8

Is 37c hot or cold?
/r/MensRights11/02/22 05:38 PM
9

I got that from the various people pointing out that discrimination based policies (like is used on reddit to police “hate speech”) are framed in a way to “protect marginalized and minority communities” yet when you look at population spread in the western world, women are a majority and men are a minority. But these policies treat it as if it’s the opposite. You made a valid point, people expanded upon it. They (and I) are saying that yes, discrimination is bad no matter who is a majority or mi…
/r/MensRights11/02/22 02:13 PM
7

Because the conversation has evolved past “what you believe” and became “the sneaky way women have convinced everyone they are a minority in the west when they are actually the majority”
/r/MensRights11/02/22 10:52 AM
2

Yeah, thats why
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/22 02:28 PM
2

If you can get a Reddit account up to ~100K karma, and it has a reasonably “non-corporate” or “non random characters” username, you can sell that account for a few hundred bucks to a company that will use it to stealthily push ads from “a real person”
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/22 02:27 PM
-2

Doesn’t justify domestic violence
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/21 07:40 PM
1

He is literally a victim of domestic abuse
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/21 05:05 PM
0

“I bet his wife got sick of the abuse as well” Victim blaming, a classic. He was asking for it by wearing that skirt, huh? And she seems to be having an issue with medication balancing, but sure, let’s take the struggles of a woman with impaired mental health abilities and say that what she did to her husband while her meds were wrong was not only appropriate, but a cause for celebration and even more attacks on her husband.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/21 03:51 PM
3

So him commenting on a very public incident like a school shooting that is leading the headlines makes him forfeit his right to privacy when he gets domestically abused?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/21 03:44 PM
5

But the person he was helping also owned a vagina
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/21 12:46 PM
8

Well yeah but that doesn’t matter really? I’m not arguing that anyone is committing a crime or needs to be legally punished. It’s about attitude and social context relative to actions being taken. Particularly the double standards at play and media/cultural acceptance of that double standard. I personally don’t trust people following behind me for an unusual amount of time, whether on foot or driving even. So I can relate to women being apprehensive in that situation. But I can also empathize wi…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 07:53 PM
27

You aren’t understanding my point? Let me make it as clear as I can. Man walk behind woman = woman scared. Feminists support this line of thinking. Man and woman (non romantically involved) are asked to take their clothes off and put their hands on each other. In your brain, these two scenarios are completely equal. Even though one lacks any physical encounter whatsoever and the other one is completely predicated on it. You are acting like telling a woman that you don’t want to be semi nude with…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:20 PM
126

Scenario A: a young woman is walking home at night and a man is walking the same direction but 50 ft behind her. She gets spooked and considers him to be a potential rapist. Scenario B: a young man and young woman are grouped up for a project which involves a non-zero amount of undressing in a social environment that shouts “believe all women!” before shouting “what are the facts here” And you are arguing that they are equal?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:45 AM
10

It’s not too mind blowing. Ingsoc is a socialist entity that specializes in canceling dissidents. The progressive left endorses socialism and cancel culture. Really the only difference I can see is that Ingsoc is competent
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:47 PM
0

You don’t honestly think that
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:07 PM
4

My man, you have ACAB in your username. You have a comment above that shits on men who criticize some women who “might” be feminists. Meanwhile, you have a username that shits on cops and generalizes them all as “bastards”. What a double standard, no? Where do you get off bashing us for criticizing a subset of women who support feminism while you are allowed to criticize and generalize all cops under one moniker? All cops are not bastards, and women who participate in feminism, all the way from …
/r/MensRights10/12/21 01:31 PM
3

It’s not about “what’s hard to believe” It’s about flawed methodology and misrepresentation. I don’t care what is easy or hard to believe, I care about what the facts are. It’s a selection bias at play. A voluntary survey about sexual assault will draw in more subjects who have a personal stake in the subject matter. For example, if there was a voluntary survey about parenting methods, and it was open to anyone, we would likely see that most respondents to the survey are parents themselves. It c…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:55 PM
1

She tells him she don’t have the kid She’s supposed to be handing over the kid. It’s absolutely understandable why he showed up there, and why he got upset that this bitch was just playing games with him and his kid. And FYI, it’s a felony in Texas to interfere with court ordered custodial arrangements. If she was supposed to hand the kid over at that certain time, as mandated by court order, then she could be charged with a felony. Self defense gets a lot harder to prove when the situation only…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:13 PM
1

Because his ex wife is there, who is supposed to be in possession of the child. Of course the father goes to where the mother is when he is trying to pick up the child at the appointed time.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:10 AM
1

When did I say the kid was there? Sorry if it was ambiguous, I meant if the kid would have been there as he was supposed to be and been handed over as planned, the gun wouldn’t have been necessary. Seems crazy the shooter would rather be in the position of seemingly kidnapping a kid and shooting a guy than just do the smart thing and hand the kid over as planned.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:13 PM
2

You keep saying “even gave him a warning shot” as if it is some sort of courtesy. It’s not. It’s illegal to fire warning shots in Texas and could be argued caused more instigation than de-escalation. Went inside to retrieve his rifle but not to retrieve the child who they are supposed to be handing over according to the court. “I know if we just give this guy his kid, he will be out of our hair. But instead, guess what? Let’s just fuckin shoot him after we piss him off enough by lying about the …
/r/MensRights27/11/21 04:07 PM
1

Well now you see the difference. Holding your gun and yelling at someone to get off your property from 500 feet away is different than pulling a gun out and shooting “warning shots” at a man 10 ft away from you. And it would be even more different if the “trespasser” in your hypothetical scenario actually had a legal and court ordered reason for being on your property in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:59 PM
3

You have to prove you feared for your safety BEFORE you pulled the gun out and started illegally shooting it. Because to me (and likely the majority of other people) bringing out a gun and shooting a warning shot seems more like provocation than de-escalation. Especially when you consider that the victim has a court ordered reason for being there. He wasn’t trespassing, he was doing what he is legally obliged to do in his custody arrangement. Say you were married and got divorced and the judge s…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:56 PM
0

Can you fire warning shots?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:45 PM
7

Idk if this is a good analogy, but it’s the best I got just waking up. We all know how kids like to put their own straws into juice boxes and stuff. The cliche of the child being upset when the parent does it for them because the kid knows he/she can do it themself. That’s how I view this situation. Not every kid will mind if the parent puts the straw in, but if you start assuming that no kid ever wants or knows how to insert their own straws, then when kids show up that like to insert their own…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 12:51 PM
74

Both. Depends on the situation and even perspective. I work in a factory for example. I’m a male. As a male, I’m expected and asked to do things that involve heavy lifting. Women in my area constantly ask for my help in moving heavy boxes because they can’t lift them. They willingly admit they can’t lift them and have said they need more men back there to help them lift these things. So men are expected and asked to do more strenuous work than women. No questions asked, it’s a given fact. But I’…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 12:45 AM
4

Wait… so saying “all lives matter” somehow takes away from black people? Is it your opinion in particular or is it a theme among black people themselves that they shouldn’t be included with “all lives”? They need their own separate but equal movement?
/r/MensRights19/11/21 01:49 PM
6

She could’ve said “hey man, I’m busy working out right now and don’t want to chit chat” But instead “nope!” slams headphones back in and turns music up all the way That’s a regular person’s reaction vs a bitchy person’s reactions.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/21 01:44 PM
22

they’re not there to make friends I didn’t go to school to make friends. I went to get an education. Still made friends while I was there though 🤷‍♂️
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/21 01:42 PM
3

It really sucks that someone can call you a rapist as much as they want but you can’t sue to stop it until you get fired.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 12:30 AM
23

Christians are a minority if you extrapolate to the whole world. American conservatives are a minority if you extrapolate to the whole world. Being a minority isn’t what qualifies as “protected” for Reddit. “Protected” applies to people that don’t question the agenda, and largely help promote it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/21 05:58 PM
17

Fox News is not anti-women
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:59 PM
3

I don’t think (and I haven’t really seen) that the higher rate of male deaths at work are something that need to be changed. In practice, I’ve only seen that brought up as a counter to the idea of “male privilege”. Men make up most of the homeless population. Men make up most of the prison population. Men make up the most deaths via suicide. Men make up the most workplace deaths. 99% of these situations are due to choices that these men make, and nobody wants to force criminals into society beca…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 03:30 AM
149

One of the mods there says they are an “Antifa super soldier” in their bio That’s the most cringe thing I’ll see all week, guaranteed.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:19 PM
5

People aren’t just saying that. They are literally calling him an asshole for it.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 09:23 PM
1

The footage is creepy as fuck too. Definitely paranormal. Or mental issues. I’m leaning towards the latter but still, that elevator footage is CREEPY
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/21 06:18 AM
4

No. It’s a repost. Look at the top corners. At least 2 layers of screenshot
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/21 04:44 AM
23

Give her number out to all the ugly broke guys he knows lmao
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/21 04:44 AM
14

This one is easy to tell, just look at the top corners where you can see the multiple layers of screenshots in action.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/21 12:36 AM
12

This is a real MurderedByWords. But that sub is pretty cucked so they’d just remove it
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/21 11:05 PM
47

Whole new meaning to the phrase “I’d drink her bath water”
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/21 11:03 PM
54

They drive the big SUV’s so that when they inevitably crash (whether it’s their fault or not) they are the ones more likely to come away in better condition. Kinda selfish, but self preservation has kept humans alive this long.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/21 11:03 PM
10

It’s a 6 day old account. Probably someone from AHS on an alt account that comes to “problematic” subs and posts obnoxiously hateful content. They then get on their main account, screenshot the comments/posts they themselves made, and use it to accuse the whole community of supporting that kind of rhetoric. It’s the equivalent of someone making 20 alt accounts to upvote their own posts to seem more popular, but way more fascistic and nefarious in intention.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:16 PM
2

I’m in agreement with you, I’m not trying to judge 2 consenting adults’ relationship. I’m just pointing out why (in the context of the USA) 18+ is viewed as the appropriate partner age of people who are also 18+.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 11:38 PM
1

We are speaking in generalities. Yeah, some states have different ages of consent. Some states have different ages of majority. Some countries have different ages of consent, some have different ages of majority. Generally speaking, if you are over 18, you should look for a partner who is also over 18. Even if age of consent is 16, it’s generally a good idea to date someone over the age of a high school senior.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 06:49 PM
2

Probably got removed because the mods can tell the story is fake. It’s reddit after all. Pretty much every story is fake. This person constantly refers to themself as “super hot” and an “attractive woman who can’t go outside without getting hit on”. I’ve never heard a woman in my life talk about themselves this way. Seems like a 40 year old guy posing as a woman for fun on the internet
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:55 PM
1

I hope you remember that if you ever report that your child is abducted
/r/MensRights03/08/21 05:05 AM
2

You’re ignoring the context of this entire post, which isn’t surprising to me. This grandfather isn’t trying to make a payday from the cops in a lawsuit. He’s trying to enjoy his day with his grandson without turning it into a years long legal battle. Not everybody is as obsessed with lawsuits as you are. Some people just want to enjoy their day and go home. Good luck fishing for your lawsuit that’ll probably never go your way in the first place, meanwhile us reasonable citizens will cooperate s…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 10:05 PM
0

”Can I see your ID” No ”Whose child is this?” no answer Yeah, seems like what a child abductor would say
/r/MensRights02/08/21 09:46 PM
-1

The cops received a call and are required to investigate it. Yeah, they went about it the wrong way, but it is still literally their job to investigate a report of child abduction. He’s helping create and sustain an environment in which police harass citizens without evidence of a crime having been committed I don’t see it that way at all. Like I said, if the cops receive a report of a child abduction, it is their duty to investigate that. And like I said, they went about it the wrong way, and a…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 09:30 PM
-4

“Bootlicker” in the reddit world means anyone who doesn’t completely and utterly hate cops no matter the circumstances
/r/MensRights02/08/21 09:05 PM
-21

I have mixed feelings about all this. She is right when she says nothing that boy could’ve done would’ve justified what happened to him I agree with that 100% But what I don’t get is: what exactly did she lie about? If she lied during the court case, it likely meant nothing. The jury was all white; the defendants were both white. The victim was black. Odds are, not a single word uttered in the courtroom changed the outcome. They were bound to be acquitted no matter what just because of race alon…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 05:43 AM
3

Well then what’s the problem here? Nobody ever said she shouldn’t be legally allowed to wear the mask in public. Someone said they didn’t understand why people would do it, and you replied talking about the first amendment. The first amendment has no bearing on individual opinions of obscenity or an airline refusing to serve someone who doesn’t adhere to their policies. So your comments are not really related to the event at hand, so now I’m wondering why you even contributed if your contributio…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/21 05:07 AM
14

But the airline is a private company and can kick people off for whatever reason they want. She can wear whatever she wants while she drives to her destination
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/21 07:46 PM
3

Cringe
/r/MensRights23/07/21 07:31 PM
11

It’s not only women making these complaints, but the women making these complaints get national attention and a whole “wage gap” myth the gets propagated in their favor. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/04/women-are-still-not-asking-for-pay-rises-here-s-why/ Just open your eyes and see the truth. If companies could get away with paying women less than men for the same work, no man would have a job anywhere because companies could make more money by only hiring women. Seems like you are the on…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 05:20 PM
13

That’s literally what is happening. If someone doesn’t work as much as someone else but then says “why don’t I make as much money as that person that’s working more than me?” that is the textbook definition of complaining. But if it helps, ignore that I used the word “complain” and actually try to refute the points I made without resorting to ad hom
/r/MensRights21/07/21 05:12 PM
11

For the same job, same hours worked, same level of education and same level of experience, the margin of pay difference is ~3% It is literally illegal in the western world to pay women less than men, all things being equal. Women just complain because they work less over time than men, or take more time off. Or they compare themselves to someone who has worked at the company longer. Women also don’t ask for raises as often as men, and when they do, they ask for ~30% less than men ask for.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 04:52 PM
12

The pay gap is a myth. It’s been debunked over and over again.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 04:45 PM
7

The woman in the post literally said that the girls having their boobs out would give the guys boners. If anyone sexualized boobs in that situation, it was the girl who said that. You can’t simultaneously say “boobs aren’t sexual” and “my boobs will definitely give these guys boners” and not be called a hypocrite. She expected her breasts to get the guys aroused, per her own words. Knowing this, she still took her top off without consent. She was okay with showing herself off in a sexual way, wi…
/r/MensRights19/07/21 05:16 PM
21

Another sacrifice at the alter of wokeism
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 10:31 PM
-3

“Oh no, this certain sub has a post about a woman getting fired for skipping work. Better ban anyone who has ever been there because they hate women” Top tier logic
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 03:33 PM
18

You are a race baiter. Account is like 5 months old, everything you post is centered on race, but nothing you post indicates you donate to foundations for black peoples, you don’t seem to volunteer your time to charities that help black people. You don’t seem to be running for office to help black people. What exactly is your end goal? Because it seems like hollow virtue signaling if you just constantly spout off about the hardships of black people without lifting a single finger to help with th…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 02:25 AM
54

How are your leftist friends gonna react to your ableist language use?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 02:11 AM
1

I’m glad I could help you understand what is going on at these events in front of children. To me, it’s just like feminism. The overwhelming majority of people believe men and women should be treated equally, but an overwhelming minority self identify as feminists. Hell, I’m bi and am totally on board with gays or anyone really being proud of who they are, but I have NEVER considered myself part of the LGBT community because a lot of what they say and do is misguided at best, straight up malicio…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 03:35 PM
2

https://youtu.be/UKMkhrmAxbo That’s the fleccas video https://www.cbc.ca/parents/learning/view/7-tips-for-having-happy-pride-with-kids There will bodies of all shapes, sizes and in all states of undress. For parents like Ian Duncan, dad to 3-year-old Carson, this is part of the experience. “We’re not body shamers,” he says. “It all feeds into my son’s emotional intelligence and development. And it’s never too early to think about that.” The above is from the CBC (Canada) explaining why it’s a go…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:34 AM
4

Your hand waving doesn’t disprove anything I said. DesmondIsAmazing was allowed to strip in a strip club while grown men threw dollar bills at him. His parents, nor the people throwing money, were ever prosecuted. People who spoke up saying it was a problem were labeled transphobes. I love how you didn’t mention that at all. Building a wall isn’t racist. Except for when the democrats say it is. https://birthmoviesdeath.com/2016/05/18/the-soft-sexism-of-hating-on-the-new-ghostbusters Cancel cultu…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:32 AM
3

Then you need to keep the non “sane” members from spreading the ideology that we aren’t allowed to question. Fleccas Talks just put out a YouTube video on the pride rally in NY. Asking people if it is an appropriate place for kids to be with all the activities going on there. Most of them say it’s up to the parents to decide. Idk about you, but I don’t think it’s up to the parent’s discretion to allow their kids to be exposed to public nudity and sexual acts.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:22 AM
1

I’m gonna take a play out of the progressive playbook here: Having black friends doesn’t mean someone isn’t racist. Having black examples doesn’t mean white people aren’t the primary targets of cancel culture.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:18 AM
3

That all the people you listed do have something in common. May not be straight males, but there’s a 3rd factor OP didn’t include that also has a good correlation with people who’ve been cancelled. Hint: melanin.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 09:26 PM
4

None of those qualities you listed have the same definition the did 30 years ago. Anti-illegal immigration? Used to be common sense. Now it’s racist. Don’t like Ghostbusters 2016? Or the Harley Quinn movie? Used to just be personal taste if you didn’t like a movie. Now it’s sexist. Don’t think kids should be able to take hormones to suppress puberty because they say they are the opposite gender? Don’t think a 8 year old boy should be at a strip club stripping for grown men?Transphobic. Don’t thi…
/r/MensRights03/07/21 08:11 PM
4

There is a common denominator between all the people you listed though
/r/MensRights03/07/21 08:05 PM
2

I’m not one of those people that ever said he was innocent. I heard about the accusations around the same time as the MeToo era began. Just like everyone else accused at this point (aside from Kavanaugh) I never made a statement about his guilt or innocence because frankly, I didn’t care. I still don’t care. Not in the sense of “I don’t care if a rapist walks the streets” but more like “my mortgage is still due regardless of if Bill fuckin Cosby is in prison”. I just kept my mouth shut and let t…
/r/MensRights01/07/21 01:29 AM
6

Ah gotcha. Yeah the article just says he “had a deal with a previous prosecutor” and I don’t know wtf that could mean
/r/MensRights30/06/21 08:16 PM
4

How? I’m not familiar with what happened in the court case, but just because someone is convicted doesn’t mean they are for sure guilty. Juries make mistakes all the time.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 07:57 PM
8

Innocent people get convicted all the time…
/r/MensRights30/06/21 07:30 PM
6

Don’t blame Christianity for modern circumcision practices in the US. Blame misguided “medical” and “hygiene” advice.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:11 AM
3

You just called a bunch of people traitors, yet want to accuse others of not being inclusive. The hypocrisy isn’t lost on me. Bye Felicia
/r/MensRights24/06/21 11:31 PM
2

So long bud, nobody is gonna miss you
/r/MensRights24/06/21 07:27 PM
4

Found the British loyalist.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 04:12 PM
4

Satirical, yeah. But you probably meant ironic because I’m suggesting reporting someone even though I believe mods have too much sway over discussions. If you wanna participate here without drawing ire, you probably shouldn’t condone rape. It really does make us all look bad. Plus, rape is illegal AND immoral. I don’t have a problem with people being banned for promoting such ideals. Mods are thought cops when they ban me for saying some “racist” jokes are funny. They aren’t being thought cops w…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 02:48 AM
9

Just report the troll, they come here all the time to say shit like this to make us look bad as a group. That way they can log on to their main account and report the comment they left on their secondary account to AHS and say “look what they say about women, the reddit admins should take action”
/r/MensRights15/06/21 02:18 AM
27

Final child support payment leads me to believe she is now 18. And therefore, he didn’t do anything “mean” to a child. He did something “mean” to a young woman. Good lesson to learn early. Life is cruel.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:52 PM
28

doesn’t want to pay for his kids that won’t see him or talk to him FTFY
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:23 PM
36

Oh no, she’s embarrassed. Meanwhile he’s out thousands and thousands of dollars for a kid that won’t talk to him. But yeah, her embarrassment is obviously the priority here.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:22 PM
5

Wahhhh
/r/MensRights11/06/21 12:18 AM
1

I assume you are from the Middle East, so I have a question: If these corporations really cared about pride and supporting gay people, especially in places where it is illegal to be gay, why do all these companies make their logos rainbow themed for every region except for the Middle East? https://twitter.com/darrengrimes_/status/1400190146562215945?s=20 You keep talking about pride in places where it is illegal to be gay, when in reality, these corporations don’t care about you. They are doing …
/r/MensRights10/06/21 04:25 PM
2

No, you explained why they celebrate overcoming the difficulties. You never explained why they need to do it though. I’m not an expert on gay people, but I don’t really think 30 days of corporations and the government blowing smoke up yalls asses to get you to consume more product or vote for their color is “necessary”. However, I am bi, with i’m pretty sure is what the “B” stands for in LGBT, so if you try to disregard my opinion on the matter, you’re just being a bigot.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 02:41 AM
1

Why do gay people “need” pride?
/r/MensRights09/06/21 10:48 PM
8

A lot of gays seems to be against straights having pride
/r/MensRights09/06/21 09:05 PM
4

Nobody should be crying about this. The opinion statement clearly says they don’t want to weigh in on matters of national defense if congress is currently deliberating the same thing. I don’t agree with that assessment, but it’s far from “we just lost, let’s start the pity party”. Never gonna be another draft anyways
/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:24 AM
1

I have many, many problems with the book you just wrote, I’ll address a few As I said, being over specialized or objectified UNWILLINGLY is A PART of a patriarchal heritage 99.99% of the women in the adult entertainment industry are there 100% willingly, so that argument falls apart there. If patriarchy is men objectifying and over sexualizing women unwillingly, then the adult entertainment industry is literally the opposite of that. People have the right to objectify their body, pose for nude p…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 04:44 AM
18

Women in the Middle East can’t go out in public without wearing a bed sheet, women here can buy a house by taking pictures of their butthole. If a guy taking a midnight stroll is a privilege, as the op states, then you have to perform some serious mental gymnastics to say that (attractive) women aren’t privileged by being financially secure just from filming videos of them masturbating.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/21 07:46 PM
20

“Patriarchy” This isn’t the Middle East, women and men are equal here. Being born an attractive woman is a huge privilege. Just like being born rich. It’s not an exploitation of society, it’s a fucking job opportunity afforded to them that isn’t really afforded to anyone else. Just like women only scholarships, or affirmative action jobs. Aka, a privilege
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/21 07:42 PM
7

Instead of an email on Father’s Day that reminds you of whatever trauma you suffered, we will just go ahead and send you one now and let all the other companies bug you on Father’s Day My paraphrase. Tbf, did they send one of these emails about Mother’s Day too? As long as they are consistent (which they probably arent) then it’s not too big a deal.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 04:08 PM
2

Other people thought it out for them, they just repeat it like a parakeet
/r/MensRights02/06/21 09:03 PM
5

The difference is really arbitrary, the point is that feminists are ignoring this fact to keep the narrative alive that it’s “old white men trying to control their bodies”.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 05:34 PM
9

https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/npvwfh/aita_for_not_telling_my_fianc%C3%A9_that_i_am_a_father/h08qab9/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:01 PM
4

https://disrn.com/news/gallup-more-women-than-men-are-pro-life
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:50 PM
9

I’m sick of feminists acting like it’s men’s fault if they have restricted access to abortions. Surveys have repeatedly shown that women are more likely to be anti-abortion than men are. Most men (right-wing/left-wing, no difference) just want the same privilege women have when it comes to opting out of parenthood. Women can choose between kill it or keep it, but we can’t (legally) choose between pay for it for 18 years or bail.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 05:04 AM
16

Conservatives aren’t the ones rolling back protections for accused males on college campuses. Feminists are the ones saying men abused by women isn’t a big deal. Feminists are the ones saying men should show their emotions, but then laugh us down and degrade us for “fragile masculinity”. We can go back and forth all day if you want, but from a culture perspective, modern feminism and their influence on media is what is harming men’s self esteem. Feminism is a left-wing ideology, point blank. Fro…
/r/MensRights02/06/21 04:56 AM
7

You just referred to the Christian God as “skydaddy” That’s pretty disrespectful, especially from someone who claims to not be mocking his beliefs. You have the right to say that, sure, but don’t gaslight people. If you wanna mock Christians, fine, but don’t piss on our legs and tell us it’s raining.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 03:36 PM
1

If I was in that position, I think a combination of chopsticks and zip ties could work in a pinch.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 01:17 AM
1

Alright now I know you gotta be trolling The OP was asking for movies and stuff BECAUSE they are trying to learn a language. Then documentaries were suggested for that explicit purpose. None of that is a tangent. You are correct, however, that what you brought up and won’t let go of is in fact tangential (meaning off topic). The facts in a documentary are irrelevant to the entire discussion, and YOU are the one who started down that path. Which is what I’ve been trying to explain.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 12:02 AM
1

See, I think that’s the miscommunication here. The core of the discussion (before you jumped in shit talking documentaries) was about how documentaries are useful for learning a language. I wanted to add to that point by saying the facts of the documentary are basically irrelevant to its usefulness as a language learning tool. I even acknowledged that the documentary could be nothing but unfounded bullshit and still have language learning value. That’s the “educational” aspect of documentaries I…
/r/MensRights23/05/21 08:50 PM
7

Surgery
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/21 07:13 PM
1

I think you are missing the point. I don’t care if it’s a documentary about how lizard people have a hand up Joe Biden’s ass, working him like a puppet. The sentence structure and grammatical accuracies are 100x better than what you’d pickup from Jersey Shore. I’m not saying either one has valuable information about the world contained in them, just that one is more likely to be grammatically correct. So learning a language through one piece of media could be way more accurate than through anoth…
/r/MensRights23/05/21 06:29 PM
1

I have mixed feelings about this A directory for movies that have positive (or at least, realistic) depictions of men would be a benefit to us that are sick of seeing 90lbs women beating up 200lbs guys, bare handed. But also, I don’t like the fact that feminists will see that sub (especially with the name you suggested) and use it to bolster their “fragile masculinity” narrative. Then again, if we let the feminists decide what we are allowed to have and not have based on their fierce and unjusti…
/r/MensRights23/05/21 03:25 PM
3

Ok, first off, idk which documentaries you watch, but there are many that are factual. Secondly, even if the documentary was full of shit, the point being made is valid: documentaries are more educational than reality tv. Better sentence structure, less ambiguity, better context clues. Watching March of the Penguins is may more conducive to learning a language than watching Snookie screech about sex and fights. Even if everything in March of the Penguins was a lie, it wouldn’t affect the grammat…
/r/MensRights23/05/21 03:20 PM
8

Uhhh... ok...
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/21 02:34 PM
1

And nothing of value would be lost
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/21 10:49 PM
1

You don’t know shit about “white people” if you think we ever hated minorities as a group. And when I say “we”, I mean modern day white people, not white people from 1670. “I don’t subscribe to that ideology but I’ll still parrot the narrative that all whites hated all minorities” You must be a single cell organism because I’ve never seen such lack of critical thinking in my entire life. You’re a racist. Lumping all white people under one behavior. I’m sure you’d love it if I started lumping all…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/21 10:49 PM
7

https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/n9iwnz/lethal_black_fungus_that_rots_organs_emerges_in/gxunq3e/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3 How original, did enough people not laugh the first time?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/21 10:37 PM
3

If the choice is between armed and unarmed, I’d take even a 2 shot derringer over a balled up fist.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 03:41 AM
-1

Remind me of why all the guns Because our founding fathers (and a lot of currently living Americans) believe that a state monopoly on violence and force doesn’t create a free society. God made men Smith & Wesson made men equal
/r/MensRights14/05/21 03:40 AM
36

I got banned from a feminist sub when someone said “there’s nothing I can do to protect myself from someone so much stronger than me”. I just commented this: https://us.glock.com/en
/r/MensRights13/05/21 09:12 PM
2

To me, the medals are like the lottery. Many people who win the lottery, they end up poor and destitute again shortly after. Many people who don’t win the lottery stay poor and destitute. So while the end is the same for both parties, it feels disingenuous to equate the journey. Same with the medals. Getting awarded medals won’t cure alcoholism or any of the other issues he mentioned, but at the very least, it’s an act of appreciation that the vast majority of the military will never see. It’s l…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 04:34 PM
1

I didn’t “drop the point of the post” In fact, I specifically said “I agree with the heart of your message” OP kinda reiterates my point, too. The medals were “less than nothing” to his great grandfather. It maybe a meaningless gesture in the long run, but that only makes it worse to me. Because we don’t even offer this meaningless gesture to everyone who serves. I thought reddit was about discussion. Instead of joining the pissed off circle jerk like everyone else, I thought I would bring up a …
/r/MensRights12/05/21 04:20 PM
-14

Wait Did you just say that your great grandfather fought in WWII and received many medals for his work? But then immediately follow that up with “he never received a thanks”? Or something like that? What do you think the medals were? Those are some of the highest forms of thanks and gratitude that our nation can bestow on somebody. I agree with the heart of your message, but you can’t say he was never thanked after describing the exact manner in which appreciation was showed for his service. And…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:38 AM
15

only two fifths of the pupils are girls Oh. That’s a huge disparity. You know it’s a problem when you have 2/5 instead of 2.5/5. Seriously though, it’s 40% girls and 60% boys. At a school that was boys only for over 100 years. 0% —> 40% isn’t good enough y’all. This woman headmaster or whatever is a real raging misogynist.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 11:54 PM
3

I can agree with that much, employers should take more consideration into how their employees’ lives are affected by hours worked, wages paid, etc etc. It’s very cold in America in that regard, where a lot of bosses just don’t think about their employees at all outside of 9-5. But even the employers that do actively care, it’s still hard to keep up with which employees are at which pay rate and how long they’ve been there and how many days they’ve missed and etc etc. There’s much more to running…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 05:49 PM
4

Username definitely does not check out The link you posted, there is clear evidence that she was being paid more in spite of budget cuts affecting everyone else. The reason this happened is because she is a black lady. He (and we) weren’t upset he was being paid less; he was upset that she was still being paid more despite what happened to everyone else. He was satisfied with his current salary, he just wanted everyone on the same playing field. In the current situation, we know literally zero d…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 05:41 PM
9

Well there you have it The male employee already negotiated his salary to be higher Now the female employee will do the same. As of now, how can any of this be attributed to sexism? The male employee has more experience and has negotiated a higher wage. The female employee has more certification and is planning to negotiate a higher wage. There’s important factors missing here that we don’t know and therefore can’t draw conclusions like sexism. How long into employment was the male’s salary rais…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 05:33 PM
136

https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/n2yusl/how_does_chris_brown_still_have_a_career/gwo4xuk/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3 That is a real comment there. “If racism exists, then how did Obama become president?” Or even worse for them “If sexism exists, why is Kamala Harris in office?” Intellectual titans over there
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:34 AM
3

Yeah, could be that she personally knows a young man going through it and that’s who she was thinking of. Like when people say “kids shouldn’t die at school”, that doesn’t mean “but it’s fine for the teachers to die there”.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 01:13 AM
6

Yeah it’s a fresh, controversial example. Which is why it’s great at making its point. People that agree with kill all men but also despise what happened to Mr. Floyd, they are gonna face some cognitive dissonance so thick it’s nearly tangible. Who knows what mental gymnastics they can pull to somehow support both causes simultaneously
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 04:23 AM
2

Legally She created child porn and distributed it He only distributed it So legally, would she not face the more serious consequences? The illegal images wouldn’t even exist if she didn’t decide to take them. They wouldn’t be shareable if she didn’t decide to distribute them. I mean, a lot of the responsibility (or lack thereof) is hers. But she didn’t even face a slap on the wrist. If the cops find two pedos sitting at a coffee shop and one creates child porn and the other distributes it, do yo…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 04:47 PM
2

The reason it became an issue initially is because an underaged girl sent a nude picture of herself in a text message. It doesn’t even matter; any of the rest of the story. The only context that could possibly change it is if the recipient was her doctor. Other than that, there is no reason whatsoever for a child to make child pornography of themselves and send it to any other person, living or dead. She created child porn. She distributed child porn. The boy just distributed it. Looking at the …
/r/MensRights15/04/21 04:41 PM
3

She literally distributed child pornography to a minor, but yeah, We DoNt WaNnA sHaMe SoMeOnE tHaT’s AlReAdY fEeLiNg BaD
/r/MensRights15/04/21 04:33 PM
10

Actual crime? You mean like distributing child pornography, which the girl did and faced no repercussions?
/r/MensRights15/04/21 04:28 PM
3

Yeah when I was 16 and in nude pics stage of my life with girls, one of the girls’ dad found out. Soon found out that they could press charges and label me a sex offender for having those pictures of her, but her possession of images of me wasn’t deemed a problem at all? They didn’t do anything and eventually it blew over, but the fact still remained that I was younger than her and they were gonna frame me as some kind of pervert perpetrator and she was some angelic victim. And they were gonna s…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 04:27 PM
50

You are the one not using logic If you work at a gas station and your boss takes $3 from your paycheck every day because he thinks you are eating a candy bar every shift. Even when you explain that you are actually not eating a candy bar every shift, he still keeps deducting $3 per shift with no evidence that it will ever change. Eventually, you realize that if you’re gonna have to pay for the candy bar anyways, you might as well actually start taking one every shift. Same deal here. If white pe…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 04:00 PM
1

Who is blaming women and generalizing them? I mean, we both are, so it’s a valid statement to make, but not in an accusatory way. I generalized women by saying they try and claim that old white men are trying to control their bodies. That statement is certainly true about a subsection of women, but not all of them. You generalized women by saying the legal system benefits them. That statement is certainly true for a subsection of women. But there’s also thousands of women who weren’t picked to g…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:07 PM
6

More women have voted in every election since the 1950s/60s. And yet they still act like the old white men are trying to control their bodies when it comes to abortion? And yet they still act like it’s old white men’s fault that there hasn’t been a woman president? And yet they still act like it’s old white racist/sexist men that got Trump elected? I can ignore all that blatant hypocrisy, but what I can’t ignore is that you actually added nothing of substance to the discussion. Protections for m…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 06:00 AM
6

What sort of analogy is that? Do conservatives do that? Or Shapiro? Or his sister? I just don’t understand your logic here. “Ben Shapiro didn’t object to the same things I do, but he does object to things I think are perfectly fine. The obvious answer is that not only he, but every conservative, hates men.” Just doesn’t hold water to me
/r/MensRights22/02/21 03:02 AM
7

Isn’t it crazy? I thought hate was a much harsher word, reserved for the asshole who cut you off and caused a fender bender. But apparently thinking men should wear pants is now “hate” as well. I hope I never get a full list of what “hate” is. I’m scared to find out I’m a real hateful guy because I don’t like mushrooms on pizza or something else super fuckin trivial.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 10:18 PM
22

How does that equal “hating men”? Seems more like a specific grievance they have with him wearing a dress, not an overarching hatred of all men. Teaching people to express themselves is fine, but teaching little boys that their expression will be valued much more if they dress as girls will only be damaging to boys and men. A guy/boy being into action movies and race cars and dinosaurs will never EVER get as much attention as a guy wearing a dress or skirt. So we will have a generation of young …
/r/MensRights21/02/21 09:34 PM
2

How old are you? Type 1 is completely way wrong. Most conservatives don’t have an issue with trans people living their own lives. We have issues when trans people encourage hormone replacement therapy for minors, or otherwise force their lifestyle onto children. When I was 5, I wanted to be Spider-Man. Thank God my parents were smart enough to not let me get bit by every spider in pursuit of my dreams. Now that I’m older, I’m glad I wasn’t making permanent, life changing decisions when I was in …
/r/MensRights15/02/21 06:41 PM
-2

What do you mean? It’s all available to see. If it’s not enough to convince you, that’s fine, but there’s certainly tons of circumstantial evidence. Just like any jury member with any court case, it’s up to you to determine if the circumstantial evidence provided is effective enough or not. I don’t know for sure that Trump won. Just like I don’t know for sure that Trump lost. All I wanted (and would still like to be completed, regardless who is in office) is a full audit of the voting machines, …
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/21 07:33 PM
0

Most votes for a winning candidate in history Least counties won by a winning candidate in history If 1984 has taught me anything, it’s not to question that 2 + 2 = 5 Despite all logic and evidence pointing to the contrary, you have to just ignore the inconsistencies and be a good drone.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/21 04:28 PM
60

Some people will abuse any slight amount of power they have. Reddit mods are a great example of this.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/20 06:38 AM
9

You dropped the /s
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/20 03:25 PM
4

Wtf does that mean? I raised/lowered my brightness to the extremes and couldn’t see anything
/r/MensRights16/09/20 04:12 AM
11

Facts
/r/MensRights16/09/20 04:10 AM
8

Not on this sub. Try it on a sub that “advocates equality” like a feminism sub and I bet the reception is much different.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/20 07:36 AM
48

Someone is in there bitching about her friend’s boyfriend asking for advice about how to approach the father to ask for her hand in marriage. She goes off about “ackshually that’s misogynistic because women aren’t property”. Umm... good for you? That’s not what was asked though. Either give applicable advice, or shut up. My fiancé would have been LIVID at me if I didn’t ask her dad’s “permission” first. I put that in quotes because ultimately we would be getting married regardless, it’s just com…
/r/MensRights19/08/20 05:39 AM
2

Well yeah it doesn’t really apply to modern times, I’m just explaining where the idea likely came from
/r/MensRights17/07/20 06:43 PM
10

It’s a hold over from pre industrial times really. One man can impregnate several women, which can revitalize a population if need be. One woman can only carry one (rarely more) child every 9 months, with a few months of recovery. Therefore if 95% of a population was wiped out, it would be easier to repopulate with 1 man and 6 women than 1 woman and 6 men. That’s a drastic example and would wreck havoc on the gene pool, but when you raise it by a factor of 100 or so, you can see the clear advant…
/r/MensRights17/07/20 03:53 PM
3

Definitely a troll. Account age is a giveaway.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 05:40 PM
30

There’s several men in the line as well. But they get no credit. Not that anyone in this line deserves even an ounce of credit. It’s just funny to barely zoom in and see men in the line. All about framing.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:15 PM
1

A democrat, ya don’t say...
/r/MensRights28/05/20 11:23 PM
1

Of course, takes all of three comments to turn into “Orange man/republicans bad11!1!!1” This entire site is one giant echo chamber. This instance has absolutely nothing to do with Trump OR republicans, but these people see the boogeyman every fucking where.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 12:51 AM
2

What a tired and worn out take. You shouldn’t defend identity politics unless you want to reduce everyone to what color they are and what genitals they were born with.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 05:01 AM
3

Owned by China.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 06:21 PM
1

You lead a sad life to come up with a username like that and troll subs for 9 days with negative karma. Get help
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/20 05:46 AM
3

A German calling an American a Nazi. What a fucking timeline
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 02:22 PM
11

Good god the hate for Fox News nowadays is insane. It’s not 2003 anymore. They certainly have a bias, but that doesn’t mean every single thing they cover has likely been altered to misinform people. There are news stations trying to pass overloaded Italian hospitals off as NYC hospitals and Kentucky gun ranges as Syrian battlefields. Hint: It’s not Fox News.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 05:36 AM
0

Germany has one of the biggest stains of all history. You can’t afford to criticize any country’s choice of governmental style when you guys committed one of the (if not THE) biggest atrocities in human history less than a century ago.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/20 08:01 AM
1

We settled this shit in 1776, the rest of the world has NOTHING on us. There’s a reason the entire world is obsessed with the US, and there’s a reason that nobody in the US thinks twice about Europe. Maybe you can figure it out with that taxpayer funded (not “free”) college degree while you enjoy having the worlds greatest military force in the history of the planet providing you with protection in the instance anyone ever wants to fuck with your shithole country.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 11:10 PM
10

Standard of living my ass. Everything is better in America. Just accept it. Best country in the history of the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 07:20 PM
11

America is THE developed country. 99% of police killings are justified. Didn’t Canada just have a mass shooting like a week ago? All of this to say, great whataboutism. I thought this post was about this specific instance that went off without a hitch, and your insistence upon outside circumstances only proves it. Cry harder.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 06:22 PM
27

But the gun worked flawlessly here. So I don’t see the issue. Apart from foreigners trying to tell us how to police our own citizens. Fuck off, nothing bad happened. Stop trying to create problems where there are none.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 05:56 PM
26

Oh wait, did he shoot them? No. He didn’t. Don’t get your panties in a wad over something that was handled without issue.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 05:47 PM
35

You don’t need weapons to outnumber and jump someone. Don’t want a gun pulled on you? Don’t interrupt an ongoing arrest.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 05:34 PM
9

I love how you tell people to study history when you need to be studying grammar Studying your history instead of sperging "women bad, women greedy" misogyny. That’s a sentence fragment. Also, tons of married couples don’t have kids... so... yeah.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 05:14 AM
19

Yeah, let’s do away with all men. Let’s go a step further, no using anything that a man invented. Ever. That’ll show us.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:19 AM
90

5.5 inches is in the ball park of average Maybe your vagina shouldn’t be a cavernous pit...
/r/MensRights13/04/20 06:46 PM
1

Strawman. Probably the only man you dont hate
/r/MensRights10/04/20 02:52 PM
8

International Men’s Day is NOT acknowledged by the UN. But International Women’s Day is. Equality, amirite?
/r/MensRights10/04/20 05:19 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/trashy/comments/ftwdni/justice_cometh/fmb2ipx/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf False accusations? Like saying Johnny Depp is an abuser, when in fact he was the one being abused? Did you even look at the context of the comment I provided? You’re fucking crazy
/r/MensRights10/04/20 05:17 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/trashy/comments/ftwdni/justice_cometh/fmb2ipx/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf Not even a week ago, yet you say: 0 for Depp You’re a liar and stupid lmao. It’s the exact comment I’ve already referenced, trying to paint Depp as an abuser, and you’re here acting like they’ve never referenced him. Idiot ass troll. Gtfo of here
/r/MensRights10/04/20 05:15 AM
3

You’re even more of an idiot than I initially assumed.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 05:04 AM
1

Ignore u/cheekyposter Amber Heard apologist
/r/MensRights10/04/20 04:03 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/trashy/comments/ftwdni/justice_cometh/fmb2ipx/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf Says all I need to know about you. You’re an idiot.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 04:03 AM
5

When we say "at least acknowledged by some" (as in the post title) we're saying that most of society tends not to acknowledge father's day, which is just not true. I think what OP meant was “at least acknowledged by some (companies, as opposed to a lot of companies acknowledging women on Mother’s Day and International Women’s Day)” I mean, FFS, the post I linked to had tons of comments (that were downvoted) asking what Sony would do for International Men’s Day. Because they never do anything for…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 11:53 PM
3

Aren’t you contradicting yourself then? Your whole point here is that most people IRL do appreciate the sacrifices that fathers make and they recognize that on Father’s Day, and that it’s internet feminists who are the ones who don’t make that recognition. But then you go and say this: It’s getting harder and harder to find people who don’t have their view of reality influenced by the media/Internet So which is it? If it’s getting harder and harder to find people not influenced by the internet, …
/r/MensRights09/04/20 10:56 PM
6

Also, if she leaves a newborn baby to die on the beach, she could be mentally unstable, and therefore a threat to others as well
/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:28 AM
4

Who said anything about constant? I was referring to this one instance. Unless you’re projecting, of course ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/20 06:20 PM
14

How original lmao And it’s the Kung Flu btw
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/20 05:43 PM
15

Who cares about sub rules when liberals wanna celebrate the deaths of those they oppose?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/20 05:26 PM
2

Also participates in the mueller sub. So no surprise to me that they are here doing this
/r/MensRights05/04/20 05:30 AM
2

Yeah we got an instant pot for Christmas last year so we have been using the fuck out of that. Homemade chili in less than an hour, vs when we used to let it simmer on the stove for like 3 hours. Ribs, the same thing. Cook em for 35 mins in the instant pot and the put them under the broiler with some bbq sauce for 5 mins. Crazy tender. Used to crock pot them for 7 hours on low and they still weren’t as tender as the instant pot gets them.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 08:28 PM
1

I’ll tell you what would happen: People would move on with their lives. Ugly people cant help being ugly (usually). I don’t think it’s “wrong” to say so. Maybe rude, but not worth public shaming or anything.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:52 AM
5

Me and my fiancé cook together every time. I’d almost say it is trivial, just the act itself. It’s the dishes afterwards that’s the real bitch.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:06 AM
2

This just makes me want to get a grill. Grilled burgers and steaks all the time? Sign me tf up
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:05 AM
3

What about truck drivers, who are still working to keep our shelves stocked with tampons and water? Overwhelmingly male. The fact you don’t even mention them is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 06:43 AM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/fm8elt/a_message_from_your_mod/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/20 03:51 AM
13

You must have missed the mod post earlier
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/20 02:36 AM
35

Merit based > diversity quota
/r/MensRights19/03/20 07:16 AM
10

This is fucking retarded anyways. Both can be true. Washing your hands and staying home when sick should be the default, even in the absence of a pandemic. If anything, it makes women look worse by implying they don’t do these things anyways, or by implying that they don’t realize most people do these things anyways. Overall, this just seems more like r/womencantmeme material.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 08:42 AM
1

Dude, the main demographic of every gaming system (minus mobile) is men.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 10:26 PM
3

Very few men kill other people over injustices. The more significant portion kill themselves over it.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 10:25 PM
2

Of course not. And the real kicker is, the feminists always have their voices heard when they try to make Father’s Day and men’s day about how wahmen deserve more respect and recognition.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 10:23 PM
6

United Nations
/r/MensRights09/03/20 06:39 AM
19

Maybe it should include that women’s day is UN recognized and men’s day isn’t.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 06:30 AM
9

Not recognized by the UN, even. So it’s basically like we don’t have a day. If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around to hear it, did it make a noise? If men have a day of recognition, but nobody recognizes it, does it even exist?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:11 AM
15

Are you joking? There’s an abortion argument (from advocates, that even males will condone) that is “no uterus, no opinion”. It’s not even hard to come across. Dave Chappelle even mentions it in one of his stand up specials, that men should sit that argument out since we don’t carry the baby. Though, to his credit, he does also say that if women get to be the sole decision maker in that regard, that men should get the choice on if they want to financially support a baby that they didn’t want in …
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:09 AM
2

That’s a great reason to not publicize specific suicides, sure. Horrible reason to not publicize the epidemic that men are facing in general, though.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 06:16 AM
1

in order to keep more people from doing it Does it really though? Not talking about something doesn’t prevent it. It lets it skirt by in the shadows while feminists bitch about seats on the subway.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:59 AM
6

only statues I think you mean “only ATMs”
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:57 AM
2

I don’t think reddit would allow a “whitesrights” sub. It would be featured on AHS within minutes or hours of being created, and quarantined/banned within days.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 08:46 AM
-2

That baby could’ve grown up to be a man. What about his rights?
/r/MensRights07/03/20 06:15 AM
14

Did you read the article? Apparently the kid was weighed like 4 different times, between 20 and 45 lbs (and the 45 was upon release from medical care). Idk how the kid is alive, but it doesn’t seem to be a typo.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 08:02 AM
5

You got downvoted (from me atleast) because you took no effort to learn the context of the video. That’s not obvious from the video at all That’s why we don’t rely on only selectively edited video. Did the Covington Catholic kids teach you nothing? If you only watch 8 seconds of a 4 hour video, don’t act like you know all the answers.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 01:05 PM
9

Maybe parents should teach their 11... year old... kids not to harass adults. This fellow taught her. Reminds me of a line from Family Guy: “let’s go push the janitor knowing he can’t legally push us back” That’s the mindset you are advocating here, and this video shows why it is flawed. Welcome to reality.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 01:01 PM
28

There are plenty of ways to stop an aggressor without hitting them. Ok, I’ll bite. There are plenty of ways. This is a woman. You don’t do that shit. THERE it is. In a gender equal society, that phrase should never even enter your mind. The fact that it does, shows you wanna give women a pussy pass to act however they want with no repercussions. You (and she) should be smart enough to not bring 80lbs of muscle to a 200lb muscle fight. When they tell bullies to pick on someone their own size, it’…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 12:57 PM
3

Allegedly Investigation ongoing.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:54 AM
1

Nick Cage syndrome i guess
/r/MensRights12/02/20 06:28 PM
13

Gotta open up a browser and go to “contact admins” on the reddit website. On the mobile app, you can only report things to the mods of the sub, and the mods will ignore it and ban you. Reporting things directly to admins goes a lot better. I’ve personally had 2 comments that I’ve reported to the mods but nothing happened, the next day I report them to admins and they even send me a message sayin “that comment has been removed for breaking rules” or whatever. So yeah, go straight to admins.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:51 AM
-3

Are they really asking a 100 year old if age affects leadership? I’m very convinced his answer is unbiased.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 08:00 AM
82

If you don’t mind me asking, what happened the first 8 times? Were there, in fact, no local milfs?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/19 05:07 AM
6

Uh, consumers don’t have to buy porn for pornstars to get paid. They get paid a set amount to do a shoot, and I don’t even think they get royalties. Unless she setup and shot all of her own videos (which I doubt) then she was most likely fairly compensated. Definitely more compensated than the males on screen with her.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/19 06:05 PM
17

It makes sense to me; toilets and men both constantly have to deal with women’s shit. Might as well appreciate both on the same day. And I love how they trash talk toilets. Like, would you prefer an outhouse? Or just shitting in a river that you drink out of? Toilets are fantastic. I have 2 myself.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:53 AM
4

Been with the same girl for 7 years, and we own a house together. Definitely not an incel. You’d probably say the same thing about her though, because she doesn’t hate men with the fire of 1000 suns.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/19 06:15 PM
13

Just like bra stuffing women. Or women who wear makeup. Or women who wear push-up bras. Or women who wear heels. Or hair extensions. Quit lying about how your tits look. They’re floppy and gross. Quit lying about how your face looks. It’s wrinkly and gross. Quit lying about your height, you’re a little hobbit. Are we really getting mad at men for disguising their true traits when women wouldn’t even get dates without hiding their face behind an inch of makeup? Guy: “I say my 5.5 inch dick is act…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/19 04:57 PM
17

My guess is there’s not enough pillows
/r/MensRights23/11/19 04:47 PM
2

about misunderstanding what I wrote Yeah I think that’s the kicker. Nobody really supports mob justice (maybe a certain middle eastern religion), but it did appear as if you were mocking this sub instead of the justiceserved one. I think people missed where you said “that sub is trash” in your original comment and assumed it said “this sub is trash”, thus making you appear as an outsider trying to come trash talk is over here. Not really your fault. Just a misunderstanding I think.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:29 PM
2

You’re actually half right about this. Post any MRA ideals in a feminist sub and you’ll be pounded with downvotes. That doesn’t make the MRA opinion “wrong” by default. But you shouldn’t assume downvotes with no rebuttals means you are “right” by default, either. It could be that you’re right and people are butthurt about it, or you could be wrong and nobody thinks it’s worth the time to tell you why.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:20 PM
2

But if those same people keep seeing us bodyslamming their mothers, daughters, and wives even in self defense they oppose us twice as strong. Self defense should always be respected. If anybody opposes someone defending themself from violence, I can only assume they are a bully that wants to be violent with no repercussions. She wouldn’t have been body slammed if she didn’t approach him in a threatening manner after already hitting him in the face. I think most mothers, daughters, and wives are …
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:17 PM
6

Eh, people are fickle. Not much you or I can do about it, and it’s definitely not unique to this sub. Once downvotes start, they don’t stop. It’s a dog pile effect. Thanks for clarifying your position though. That’s all you can really do.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:51 PM
8

She does get WWE’d a little bit at the end after she gasp re-instigated the fight she just cried over.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:32 PM
13

Honestly, that sub is quite trash. It celebrates not only individual people hitting back, but also mob justice... When you say those things in that order, it makes it seem like you think the sub is “quite trash” because it celebrates individual people hitting back AND mob justice. You could’ve worded it like this to be less ambiguous: “That sub is trash. Defending yourself from violence is one thing, but mob justice shouldn’t be promoted or accepted”
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:24 PM
17

It celebrates not only individual people hitting back You say that like self defense is a bad thing?
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:20 PM
8

I feel like we would get farther if we pushed stuff like I mentioned above rather than videos of men defending themselves against violent women who are too short sighted to see consequences of their violent actions. FTFY, but also, you’re still wrong. Showing videos or pictures of men being hurt just results in “yas queen, slay” or some stupid shit from the feminists. They don’t give a fuck if men get hurt. Example: Draft.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:19 PM
10

I was rewatching some Zack and Cody the other day and one of the first episodes has the twins dressing in drag. Wtf.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:35 PM
1

Just like the drug problem in this country is the lax drug laws, right? People wouldn’t do drugs if the government made them illegal.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:11 PM
5

You can tell it was against her will by the way she puckered up her lips and leaned into him smiling
/r/MensRights12/07/19 03:50 PM
15

I’m waiting... For my brain cells to grow back after reading your comments.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:02 AM
2

I’m not calling for you to be censored, numb nuts. I’m calling for admins to quit censoring mundane shit if they don’t censor literal calls to violence. Notice how I’ve never said you should be censored, just asked a question. But you got triggered by a question. Predictable. I’m anti double standards. If you can have a username that calls for violence to conservatives, then why can’t TD post comments that also advocate violence? If it wasn’t for double standards, you’d have no standards at all.…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:27 AM
0

The triggered libtard inciting violence. See, that’s easy.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 12:14 PM
1

The whole reason I bring it up is because an entire community was just quarantined for “advocating violence” but people with these account names get to post wherever? (To admins) Enforce the rules evenly across the board, or don’t at all.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 12:10 PM
30

How are you allowed to post when your username is literally a call to violence?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 05:44 AM
3

It is weird. A certain gaywonk complains on twitter about a certain subreddit, and two days later, that same subreddit is punished by the admins. Definitely seems coordinated. They’ll try the same shit here.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 05:29 AM
3

Just because they weren’t punished doesn’t mean they didn’t break the rules. Chapotraphouse constantly advocates and celebrates violence, they are still around. Not even quarantined.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 05:26 AM
0

Is sarcasm not civil?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:38 AM
0

Not masculine enough See that’s toxic. The look you want doesn’t matter, it’s supposed to be about crushing gender norms. What’s next, is showing emotion not masculine enough? What about playing with dolls? Just paint your nails pink, you bigot. Your virtue signaling at its current stage won’t win over any feminists, you gotta step your game up.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:40 AM
3

And he won’t answer
/r/MensRights23/06/19 04:34 PM
1

You used a whole bunch of words to say nothing. Explain to me what this supposed “narrative” is. Because with the amount of migratory flooding happening around the West, it would appear as if some prominent right wing narrative around stopping immigration is drowned out by all the calls for diversity and inclusion, cultural incompatibility and consequences be damned.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:30 PM
1

Ok, I’ll bite. I’m a bigot. Let’s go with that. Since that’s out of the way, and we both accept it, can you honestly say there’s no other reasons for someone to oppose mass immigration from shithole countries?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:42 PM
2

9 hours in and not a single comment... Spooky
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:58 PM
2

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=roe%20v%20wade%20supreme%20court%20justices&ia=images&iax=images&iai=http://www.worldatlas.com/r/w728-h425-c728x425/upload/b2/e4/f4/roe-v-wade-justices.jpg Guess we should overturn Roe v Wade then...
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:44 PM
0

I don’t care about those cities. You said moving to Mexico was a great decision. I’m looking at that statement from my perspective to see if it seems like a good deal. And it doesn’t. Because Mexico is a terrible country when compared to America. That’s why so many of them try to come here.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:29 PM
0

I believe in freedom of speech, I’m not letting some bot tell me what I should and shouldn’t say. Supposed to be the other way around.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:26 PM
1

Whoa, it’s almost as if there’s more to America than Chicago and other metropolitan areas. Are there any non-urban areas in America? I’m from Mississippi so I wouldn’t know about any more rural areas in the country.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:24 PM
-1

You’re retarded
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:13 PM
1

Because I’d rather deal with cartel violence and drug trafficking than avoid a business with terrible bathroom policies /s
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:12 PM
1

I’m not saying he was born elsewhere, but there was also the whole deal with this https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/promotional-booklet/ I’m just pointing out that people weren’t only skeptical because of his race; there were actual documents that claimed as such. It seems to me that people are quick to attribute racism to something that is more easily explained when the context is presented. Black people are born in America everyday, obviously one of them can grow up and be president. I highly …
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:24 PM
2

How is that even racial? Obama himself claimed to be from Kenya. We can’t even want to know the truth behind something without being called racist? https://www.wnd.com/2018/07/obama-says-hes-from-kenya-again/
/r/MensRights05/05/19 05:21 PM
1

Look at how sexist you are... Victim shaming is bad, we shouldn’t do that, but we simultaneously shouldn’t advocate for women to protect themselves because they’re women, amiright???? The best defense against a rape is a concealed 9mm. Guaranteed.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 04:01 AM
3

Well I live in the US (along with a majority of redditors) so yeah, my comment comes from that perspective. Each individual area has its own responsibility in this. There is no “one size fits all” solution that can be implemented across the board.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 04:49 PM
0

Here’s the fundamental disconnection: What you wear is less likely to “get you raped” (for lack of a better term) than where you wear it, for example. You can wear a miniskirt and everything be ok. But if you wear a miniskirt down a street with convicted sex offenders living on it, your statistical chance at being raped just skyrocketed. In this instance the WRONG advice is “don’t wear a miniskirt”. The RIGHT advice is be more careful where you decide to walk after dark. Especially places you ar…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 04:23 PM
-7

“Victim shaming” If I leave my phone in my car parked on the side of the street in Chicago, and it gets stolen, would it be “victim shaming” for someone to tell me that I could’ve prevented it by being more careful where I leave my phone? If I go outside in a thunderstorm and hold up a giant metal rod and get struck by lightning, is it “victim shaming” for someone to explain that holding metal rods in thunderstorms makes me more likely to be struck by lightning, and that I could’ve prevented it?
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:54 PM
10

I think it means you have selective outrage. Almost 5 million bigots in the politics sub, less than 300K here. Yet we see where you focus your efforts. You get the gold medal in virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:47 PM
16

You must really hate straight people if they can’t give their opinions on child rearing without you getting triggered and calling everyone bigots.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:46 PM
19

Um, they are. Just look at black fatherlessness vs crime rate. Anything to destroy the idea of traditional marriage and child rearing, right? You imply that we are bigots for upvoting terry crews, but default subs like the politics sub will upvote posts (to over 40K) about Hillary Clinton, who literally referred to young black men as “super predators”. Take a look at the sub counts and up votes of each subreddit and tell me where the real bigotry problem lies.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 04:47 PM
6

Lol imagine the polite workers at chick-fil-a cussing a dad out for requesting the service.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:00 PM
13

I think Father’s Day and Mother’s Day, in conjunction with birthdays, gives plenty of time and reason to celebrate the men and women in your life.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:24 PM
12

I’m thinking it’s like this “If white men online said they won’t go see the film, we should let some women see it for free in hopes that we can get positive online reviews from them to bring in more viewers/garner positive exposure to quell backlash”
/r/MensRights28/02/19 05:22 PM
1

Dude, this whole entire post is about babies. I don’t care if you wanna go have yourself mutilated at the age of 18. The problem is, as you know, that millions of babies are having this done to them without consent.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:21 PM
34

“Let’s mutilate babies so that their dicks are pleasant for me to look at” u/Stalinisthicc
/r/MensRights17/02/19 05:17 AM
8

You mean like how TMOR brigades the conservative subreddit every single day but the admins do nothing?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 03:26 PM
7

Are you squatting or not? You have no right to play vigilante here. Holding a subreddit hostage because you don’t wanna relinquish control over something that was never active...? You are coming across as quite the weirdo. Either shit, or get off the pot.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 02:14 AM
2

I can understand why he was confused. In Louisiana, he probably figured most people agreed with him. Still shitty time to try and preach about homosexuality though.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:39 PM
2

Too early for people to be cutting onions!
/r/MensRights23/01/19 03:56 PM
44

War is peace... I know where this is headed
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:38 AM
11

Why do people have to assume that that’s what every guy goes through? Look at Gillette, saying “men can do better” as if every man was raised with the exact same “toxic masculinity”. If Gillette was saying “Bill Cosby can do better” or “Harvey Weinstein can do better” we would be having a different discussion. But they used the actions of those degenerates as if they represent men as a whole. To act as if every guy is gonna rape every chick unless taught otherwise, that’s pretty damn preachy. Th…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:28 PM
7

Sheesh, didn’t think that one through, huh?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:14 AM
7

I respect anyone who learns a new language that fluently. I stopped learning Spanish after being taught “where is the bathroom”.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 03:27 AM
9

Holy shit, reading through that link, it dawned on me how fucking often politicians on both sides use that exact strategy. That’s why I don’t like politicians.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 03:26 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/afcgtm/this_is_what_rallrising_used_to_look_like_every/?st=JQYB30CV&sh=d25262ea This is what I’m talking about. It only gets worse as we go. TD used to make it to the front page pretty frequently because people upvoted it. The vocal minority got super triggered and demanded that the “hate speech” or whatever not be shown. By generalizing any content inside TD as hate speech, regardless of what the individual content may be, they’ve successfully walled…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:12 PM
3

The wall would be 0.14% of the total amount of money the US spent in 2018 5.7 billion Vs 4.1 trillion. At such little investment, we might as well see if it works. There’s honestly very little to lose. With Israel being viewed as a trial run (even with all the differences in the 2 situations) the stats seem to show that for very little money, we could potentially get very high returns. Considering most Americans view the situation at the border as a problem or crisis, I think it’s worth it.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:24 PM
3

Lol not that. r/the_donald posts, no matter how popular they get, are always, let me repeat, ALWAYS hidden from the front page. Even if the user is NOT banned. I’m okay with banning individuals who break rules. I’m not okay with censoring an entire subreddit just because they support Donald trump.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:18 PM
4

I am thinking about the logistics. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/feb/13/ron-johnson/border-fence-israel-cut-illegal-immigration-99-per/ Tell me how a reduction in illegal immigration by THAT MUCH isn’t effective? “People get across all the time” Well the numbers disagree buddy. 16000 people per year before Israel wall. 20 people per year after Israel wall. You are being incredibly disingenuous to pretend as if the Israel wall isn’t working. It’s working EXACTLY as inte…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:42 PM
11

Lol I remember when reddit supported free speech. A site that calls itself “the front page of the internet” hides positive posts about the current President from hitting the front page. Almost as if there’s an agenda to push.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:20 PM
9

Someone get this guy a medal. He has a mindwarping new discovery that could save prisons tons of money: Walls don’t work. Please oh please never tell the prisoners in prison that. Somehow we’ve convinced them that the walls DO work, and that’s why they all stay there. It can’t be that walls actually work. Nah, it’s just a big inside joke that the past few thousand years worth of humans were in on. Let’s not even start with zoos. Somehow we as humans have brainwashed thousands of animals into thi…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:17 PM
6

6 more years
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:32 PM
11

The red pill has footage of circumcision at the end, I wouldn’t be surprised if that is considered a good enough excuse to censor the whole damn thing. If they really wanna censor the graphic images, they could just blur it? Or cut the movie 3 minutes short? Of course I’m not that naive. It’s not the images they are worried about. It’s the ideas.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:17 AM
14

This is one of those “how to delete someone else’s reddit comment” moments
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:38 PM
5

Seems like a great way to do horrific shit in private without needing to explain yourself to the public. Is it illegal to expose it? Cassie Jaye’s The Red Pill shows male circumcision. She hasn’t been charged with distribution of child pornography. This doesn’t seem like a legal defense, it seems like Netflix sanctioned censorship. They don’t want the brutality of the procedure to be common knowledge.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 04:05 PM
132

Male privilege if I’ve ever seen it. You mean to tell me the police came and woke you up in the middle of the night to give you a more secure sleeping location? How benevolent!
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:54 PM
8

Serious answer: If showing the procedure uncensored would be considered child pornography, why isn’t the procedure itself considered child abuse? Or the people doing the procedure, why aren’t they considered abusers? If it’s ok for them to do it, it’s ok to be publicly shown. If it’s not ok for it to be publicly shown, then it shouldn’t be ok for them to even do the procedure.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:51 PM
2

You are into some fucked up pornos my guy.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 02:59 PM
9

Reddit is a piece, yeah. But I don’t use Reddit’s built-in news feature, just like I don’t use Apple’s (and by extension, Google) built-in news feed (as displayed in OP). I don’t really care for what they decide I’d like to see, I can look up news without Apple telling me exactly where to look. Sometimes if it’s a news story that looks interesting, I’ll just google the topic and read a couple different articles. But I pretty much wholly ignore whatever curated piece they try and provide “for my …
/r/MensRights16/12/18 12:03 AM
4

Nah man, “diversity” based scholarships as opposed to merit based scholarships is what we currently have. We shouldn’t differentiate at all based on sex or race. What is this, the freakin 1950s?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 10:03 PM
20

Better yet: Ignore news feed
/r/MensRights15/12/18 10:02 PM
3

Here’s the issue. The sub that was linked to supports the president. Why is that overly political to you? So much so that you gotta get butt hurt and try and say what is and isn’t acceptable to “associate” this sub with? It’s not a strictly partisan sub. The one thing that brings the sub together is support for the president, not support for republicans or hate for democrats. My point being, it’s just a post celebrating men. And this is a post simply acknowledging that the first post exists in a…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 10:16 PM
2

Associating this sub with it? How? By saying “oh look, props to those people for celebrating men” That’s a step too far for you? No. Not normally I hope. Only when it involves trump I imagine, right?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:28 PM
2

So if someone participates in a subreddit dedicated to supporting our current president, that’s enough of a reason to disregard their opinion on men’s rights? You’re gonna miss out on a lot of allies if you go that route. I wouldn’t disregard someone who supports men’s rights while also disagreeing with Trump. I’d hope I receive the same respect if the situation was reversed on me.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:04 PM
5

And who did that? From what I can see, someone just linked to another post supporting men and their sacrifices. It seems that some people are so caught up in their own personal politics that they can’t see the forest because of all the trees. Men’s rights shouldn’t be a left vs right thing. Men’s rights is about men’s rights. We should acknowledge when anyone celebrates men. If you care so much about your own personal politics that you’d let it keep you from celebrating men’s rights, then you ar…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:00 PM
5

When men are discriminated against with policy then it is inherently a political thing. Like how can we address the discrepancy in the draft without bringing up policy changes, and thus becoming political? How can we fight against the Duluth model without policy, and thus political action. When you say you don’t wanna turn men’s rights into a political thing, I read that as “I don’t wanna get anything accomplished” because without getting political, we are just whining on the internet. Without t…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:47 PM
5

Wtf, youll ask someone else to provide evidence, but when it’s your turn, nope. “I’m at work on my phone, so I can make wild claims without backing them up... you? Oh, you’ve gotta send me evidence to support your claim though”
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:45 PM
2

Books on men’s rights don’t get published, if even written at all. Ship of Fools talks about challenges that men face, and about how America and the world as a whole are ignoring those issues.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 06:23 PM
7

Fighting for equal rights of oppressed does not equal fighting for less rights for white males Yeah, until it does. I understand what you mean, that fighting for the oppressed doesn’t necessarily have to equal fighting for oppression of the majority. But that’s not reality for us. The reality is that fighting for the oppressed is decimating our culture of merit based hiring. Here’s just a quick hypothetical. A company has 10 open positions to fill. 12 people apply and make it to the interview st…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 05:43 PM
2

Do you remember how you got there, how you got home? Would you remember if you showed your therapists notes to the press, or simply told them about it, 6 weeks ago?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:24 PM
4

You unironically used Uber as an adjective. That says all I need to know about your level of maturity. He has more people agreeing with you in the linked thread than you do because you don’t know shit about facts. You only got your fee fees. And they are hurt so you came here to harass him more. You truly are pathetic.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:57 PM
0

An investigation? Like the senate judiciary committee investigation that has followed up every allegation and reached out to every witness and not a SINGLE SHRED of evidence has surfaced to corroborate these claims?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:46 PM
2

“Who gives a fuck if you partied 30 years ago? The question here is about flatulence in your yearbook” -the Dems.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 05:17 AM
2

The senate judiciary committee investigation that the Dems have willingly refused to participate in. Where they have recorded every allegation and interviewed Kavanaugh in respect to every allegation. Where they received the written testimony of the witnesses, and the Dems didn’t show up to fight for having the witnesses show up in person as opposed to sending in letters. The majority swore them in and entered them as evidence without a peep from the Dems about bringing in witnesses for question…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 05:15 AM
-4

I Thank God almighty that you don’t vote then
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:57 AM
2

And that could have been requested if the Dems would have CHOSEN to participate in the investigation. An investigation which is normally bipartisan was WILLINGLY skipped out on by the Dems. But they chose to not participate. So why are they now claiming that they had no say and that those people should come in? They literally could have OFFICIALLY requested they come in if they would’ve participated. The Dems did not participate. That means they knew the majority was looking at evidence to swear…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:24 AM
0

So you are victim blaming Kavanaugh/ the Republicans? Come on bro that’s a step too far /s But I see what you are saying, everything is motivated by revenge and wanting to stick it to the opposing side for some previous “wrong doing”
/r/MensRights28/09/18 12:27 AM
2

That is how it works because the chairman of the committee said so SEVERAL times in the hearing. Nobody on the committee refuted that they were sworn in, only that the Dems didn’t participate in the investigation BY CHOICE. That doesn’t mean that the statements aren’t sworn. They definitely are. Under threat of felony. Only one party suppressing facts? Feinstein waited 6 weeks before bringing this up to the committee, while waiting days to tell Ford to lawyer up. The committee has confidential, …
/r/MensRights28/09/18 12:22 AM
1

The GOP? If all that’s being asked for is an investigation into the allegations, why did Feinstein sit on the information for WEEKS without bringing it to the attention of the committee so they could investigate (or ask for FBI investigation) back in August? Why did Feinstein immediately tell Ford to find lawyers (and recommend lawyers) but not ask Kavanaugh about this during the 32 hour questioning? Not a fucking peep from anyone, waiting on the right time to launch the smear campaign. Feinstei…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:07 PM
2

No dude. I’m telling you, they said it in the hearing today. Grassley said “the majority have signed off on those being sworn statements” A dem said “were any Dems involved” Grassley said “no” The same dem said “did you instruct them not to be” Grassley said “no” The same dem said “so they chose not to participate?” Grassley said “that’s right” BECAUSE Dems have objected and been opposed to “obtaining the truth”. They are sworn statements, recognized by the committee.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:59 PM
7

Yes they are. The senate swore it in. The Dems chose not to participate, but it’s still sworn testimony. I wonder if the Dems chose not to participate since it refuted their claims...? (Obviously)
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:20 PM
11

https://m.theepochtimes.com/all-witnesses-deny-allegations-against-kavanaugh-ahead-of-hearing_2668991.html Couple things in there that might interest you. “Smyth, Keyser, and Judge have denied Ford’s allegation in letters to the committee under the penalty of felony perjury. Kavanaugh denied the allegation in person under oath before the committee. Ford remains the only witness to not have provided a statement to the committee.” “These official letters from the 4 named by Dr. Ford—denying any kn…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:53 PM
13

But NAMED witnesses cannot corroborate a single SPECIFIC allegation. So. Having multiple people with equally thin and contradictory allegations doesn’t strengthen their validity. Each one should be viewed separately until we can prove that EVEN ONE of them actually occurred. Then maybe talk about a pattern of behavior and “corroborating words of other victims” If the allegations can’t be supported by themselves, they definitely should not be used to support each other. The only “pattern of behav…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:35 PM
12

The issue here is lack of evidence. No court would reach a verdict because there’s so little evidence. It would be dismissed within a few hours, if it even took that long. Should there be an investigation? Maybe. That’s up to people with the power to start an investigation. Should the confirmation vote be delayed over and over and over until every little (unsubstantiated) allegation gets a weeks long investigation? Absolutely not. The lack of physical evidence (and the presence of contradictory …
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:31 PM
3

“These official letters from the 4 named by Dr. Ford—denying any knowledge of what Dr. Ford has alleged—serve the same purpose as sworn testimony,” Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a member of the judiciary committee, wrote on Twitter on Sept. 23. “We remain hopeful we’ll hear sworn testimony from the 5th, Dr. Ford herself.” From the same article. I don’t have the knowledge myself that they are equal to statements made while under oath. But I will believe when a senator on the committee says that it s…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:59 AM
4

The affidavit isn’t even notarized!! Are you serious!? You think that document is legally binding? Look at it. There is no notary signature. The notary being present is what makes your signature UNDER OATH. Just writing “perjury” in the document doesn’t mean shit if it wasn’t SIGNED in front of a NOTARY. You’re not one to talk about kool aid dude. You don’t even know how SWORN affidavits work.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:24 AM
4

Those allegations shouldn’t halt our political process. When all of the allegations are equally thin and vague, they shouldn’t have any power to prolong his career. You know he has had 6 FBI background inspections in his career? None of them have turned up anything like this. For fuck sake, one of the allegations is that he was running (or involved in) a high school gang rape ring that existed for years and a college student was attending the parties where she saw these rapes happen, and continu…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:12 AM
3

https://m.theepochtimes.com/all-witnesses-deny-allegations-against-kavanaugh-ahead-of-hearing_2668991.html “Smyth, Keyser, and Judge have denied Ford’s allegation in letters to the committee under the penalty of felony perjury. Kavanaugh denied the allegation in person under oath before the committee. Ford remains the only witness to not have provided a statement to the committee.” Under penalty of felony perjury, they all deny the allegations. How do you not know this? Because the left wing MSM…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 12:00 AM
4

The thing is that he’s innocent until proven guilty. Until he is proven guilty, I will continue to believe he is innocent and treat him as such. No credible evidence has been submitted. Zero. Nada. Zilch. You’d think over the what, 4 accusers? that SOMEONE would have some sort of credible, legally admissible evidence. But there is ZERO. The hearing tomorrow will give Ford the chance to actually testify under oath. She will be questioned about the lack of evidence and apparent contradictions in h…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:36 PM
3

2 negatives can exist in the same sentence. Are you seriously gonna say my writing is shit? If ANYTHING, parenthesis would have been appropriate after “testimony” and before “enough” but other than that my sentence is perfectly structured. No commas. “Is their testimony (removed adjective phrase) enough to convince you that it didn’t happen or not?” “Is it enough or not” is the basic form of the sentence. Double negatives don’t work in English WHEN THEY CONTRADICT EACH OTHER. There’s no rule tha…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:37 PM
6

One person coming forward with credible testimony. One person with a specific date. One person with a specific place. One person with witnesses that can corroborate the story. That’s all I’m asking for. A man’s reputation is on the line, is it too much to ask for an allegation to be backed up with evidence before we condemn him?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:29 PM
4

Way to deflect. Is their testimony that cannot corroborate the alleged event enough evidence to convince you it didn’t happen or not? Enough people have testified for you to give an answer to my question.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:52 PM
7

Witnesses (that ford named) gave testimony UNDER OATH. They weren’t able to corroborate the story. What more evidence do you want?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:39 PM
8

It’s not whataboutism. He was telling you to watch Biden’s old video (from the 90s) about how the FBI never reaches conclusions. It supports the statement that an FBI investigation would be pointless. And a nomination to highest court in the land shouldn’t be derailed based off of very vague and contradictory accusations. Otherwise our country is fucked. There’s a hearing tomorrow. Ford can speak and so can Brett. We will find out then.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:38 PM
9

Key word being “report” I wouldn’t classify an accusation about something that happened 30 years prior that was NOT reported to the police at the time as a “reported” rape, but we see the same mentality that Hillary has here about the whole Kavanaugh ordeal. Any PERSON that REPORTS sexual assault should be HEARD but not automatically BELIEVED. A full scale investigation should occur if preliminary questioning of all the parties and witnesses involved indicates a likely chance it happened, or if …
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:36 AM
10

This is fucked. I honestly think this ruins his chances of getting voted in. I can’t wait until I’m 50+ years old so I can ruin Dems lives with baseless accusations from when I was 20. The precedent has been set.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:50 AM
3

Well... i mean, without a police investigation, can we be confident that surveys and friends are telling the truth? Isn’t that the whole point of this, evidence before fee fees? It stands to reason that out of reported rapes, we can prove that ~90% of them happened and around 10% didn’t. But with unreported rapes, we can’t prove that ANY of them happened. And it’s not anyone’s burden to prove they DIDNT happen. I’m not naive enough to think 100% of unreported rapes are false, but they definitely…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 03:12 AM
3

Idk, I’ve never referenced any of those numbers so I don’t feel they should really be attributed to me, or for me to be expected to explain them. But I understand you asking that to someone pushing those numbers, that person isn’t me though so I’m not much help.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:58 AM
9

How the fuck do they determine with such certainty that only 1/3 of rapes are reported? Wouldn’t they have to be reported for us to be sure they even exist? It’s irrelevant to base an argument on things we can’t prove. What we can say for certain is that out of 100% reported rapes, up to 10% are possibly false (based on their evidence, I’m not sure about that number’s accuracy nowadays seeing as though a lot of the studies were concluded in the early 2010s. I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:50 AM
10

Those are gender neutral. Tampons aren’t. Not exactly the same thing.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:19 PM
13

Your attacks on his character have literally zero to do with this article. That’s called whataboutism. “Drake is suing this girl for slander” You: doesn’t matter because I heard one time he did this one thing I don’t like.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:04 PM
15

Ad Homs? Like how you attacked drake?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:32 PM
4

Beep boop it’s a spectrum
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:44 PM
14

That the coaches are probably male
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:26 PM
2

Took some digging to finally find out for sure. The two people who took the pics and went to the media with them were 2 black lesbians. Daily Mail ran with the story. Fox then tweeted about the story. I don’t use twitter so I can’t really see how fox portrayed the story, but Daily Mail (and the black lesbians) were pretty condescending about the whole thing. She said it was sad to see him like that. And then I stumbled upon the pics of her and her wife. Let’s just say they aren’t ones to judge s…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:47 AM
2

What the fuck? Your bias is showing so much. The overwhelming majority of people on this sub (and I’m not trying to speak for everyone, just taking an educated guess) wouldn’t instantly do anything besides request to see evidence. Anytime there’s evidence of a crime (after an investigation), then charges should be pursued. Whenever there isn’t evidence of a crime (after an investigation), then charges should be dropped for the accused and a punishment should be in place for the accuser. I think …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:02 AM
6

Calling to light that a woman lied about her experience doesn’t equate to calling for acquittal on every charge. And no matter what he’s done, he doesn’t deserve to be accused of things he didn’t do. He should be judged for the crimes he actually did commit, and I will absolutely defend his or anyone’s right to not face punishment and also to receive compensation (usually just court costs, but sometimes damages as well) when confronted with fraudulent charges.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:50 AM
3

I get what you are saying. I recently watched A Time To Kill and it tackles something similar to this, in that a little girl is raped by 2 guys and the father goes out and murders the two guys when he realizes they will likely walk free. The movie is about the trial resulting when the state decides to prosecute him for murder.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:11 PM
3

Yep, look at James woods. His agent dropped him on the 4th of July (doesn’t give a reason, but James and most people acknowledge that it’s because James is a conservative).
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:10 PM
1

I read that only in Scotland are kitchen knives considered separate from the rule. They allow 16-18 year olds to buy them but the UK in general limits it to 18, even for kitchen knives. But I fail to see what that has to do with home delivery. I know online retailers and websites can limit transactions until a picture of ID is uploaded and approved. But the home delivery ban doesn’t seem to even care about ID. They are banning it altogether. And why does the claim not seem legitimate? He says th…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:58 PM
1

What’s crazy is that people who open carry an AR are among the least likely of gun owners to commit a violent crime. Concealed handguns are what you should be afraid of.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:40 PM
1

But people are still being stabbed every single day. So there is still great risk of being stabbed despite what the laws are. Are you blind to that? London had (maybe still does) a higher murder rate than NYC. That’s pretty scary right? Acid attacks are still happening, right? Genuine question here, can you legally carry pepper spray or a taser for self defense?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:37 PM
1

I don’t have a link but I heard it in count dankulas video about the state of the UK or something like that. Posted a week ago. I don’t know the legitimacy but he does claim to know people that it’s happened to. What I could easily find was that the UK is banning home delivery of knives. What’s up with that? That seems rather excessive, wouldn’t you agree? Wouldn’t most people who have knives delivered to their homes be law abiding citizens who just wanted to order some fancy knives? In America,…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:33 PM
1

Then what about people being arrested for having knives while camping or fishing? They didn’t have any violent intentions.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 05:26 PM
1

That’s the thing. A law can’t prevent you from defending yourself, it can only punish you for doing so. You aren’t legally protected to defend yourself (stupid by itself) but that doesn’t mean defending yourself isn’t a logical thing to do. I’d rather go to jail for having a knife to defend myself than let someone stab me because I can’t defend myself. There’s a saying here in America I hear gun rights / self defense advocates use: I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Meaning I’d rather…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 05:24 PM
1

So zero innocent, unarmed people have been stabbed? Because if the answer is “yes innocent, unarmed people have been stabbed” then there’s already evidence that some people should have been carrying a weapon despite not looking for trouble.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:57 PM
1

But you are also posting on reddit you nerd. I’d like to address something you said earlier “We don’t want people stabbing each other in the streets” Well the current legislation isn’t really helping that, is it? People are still CONSTANTLY being stabbed in the streets of London. And if you carry a knife solely to fend off would be attackers, you are now a criminal as well.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:54 PM
2

Do you have a source? I’m genuinely curious about a poll or something in the UK that gauges public perception of things like sexist laws and potato peelers in public.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:36 PM
-1

I don’t think I’m being controversial when I tell you how I think and feel about people being arrested for having potato peelers in public and women getting a “get out of jail” card for petty crimes simply for being women.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:31 PM
-1

So are you being critical or telling me how people think and feel when you say “the Americans so staunchly defend the second amendment despite all the carnage it causes” Because if that’s “fair” for you to say about America, then nothing I’ve said can be considered “unfair”.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:09 PM
2

Seems like a waste of police resources in the first place, then a waste of taxpayer money to correct it. Because of butter knives
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:44 PM
2

Nonsense? So a guy didn’t get arrested for wielding a potato peeler? Women aren’t about to be put in rehabs instead of jail unless the commit a violent act? But no word on men. Nothing in the article protects them from jail over petty crime. It’s not nonsense, your rebuttal about Trump is nonsense. He literally has nothing to do with this. This is about the joke that your country has become. Because of people that represent you, not me.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:40 PM
0

Because nobody in the UK criticizes America. Not once. Never.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:33 PM
1

“Personally” “We” Which is it? Are you speaking for yourself or everyone in the UK?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:29 PM
13

What does this have to do with trump? I heard about the potato peeler by watching Sargon. He’s a Brit too and he can acknowledge that shits fucked up over there. I’m not trying to patronize you. I’m honestly just a concerned observer. It worries me seeing things like OP posted or seeing people arrested for potato peelers. You probably have the same kinda thoughts when looking at America with Trump as president.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 12:58 AM
83

http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/03/british-man-arrested-for-wielding-potato-peeler/
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:35 PM
665

Shit is falling apart on the other side of the pond. Guy has potato peeler in public? ILLEGAL Girl shoplifts from store? Well she doesn’t need to go to jail, she just needs help. (Presumably) Guy shoplifts from store? Jail is appropriate.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:06 PM
126

What..? It’s best for the child to have a father and mother in his/her life. One side lying to the child about the other side for pure manipulation is not best for the child, despite if side one believes they are lying “for the greater good”. I’m not pretending as if all parents must have mandatory contact with their kids. Some parents prove themselves to be despicable / totally incapable of raising a child. They are rightly separated from their kids. But that’s not the case all the time. Probab…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 02:19 AM
439

This is just sad. What’s sadder is that there are thousands and thousands of guys (and girls to a lesser extent) that are dealing with this. Some people get so delusional over their hate of a person that they completely cast aside the well being of the child under the guise of “doing what’s best for the child”.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 01:05 AM
5

-Seduces your friends/sister/anyone If you’re gonna go full crazy and say anyone, why even include friend/sister? Just say anyone. Aren’t friends/sisters included in anyone?
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:57 AM
5

You know what would stop this? Banning cars.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 06:00 PM
2

Not everybody is promoting it at the same rate as others. Some (the feminists) view obesity as happiness, and get mad at doctors for trying to tell them they are unhealthy. Have you heard of “Health at every size” or whatever? It’s not men’s rights groups promoting those ideals, it’s feminists. Being obese is not healthy, but movements like health at every size normalize obesity. Yes, obesity is bad. Everyone should know it. But the fat feminists running around about fat acceptance need to hear …
/r/MensRights27/06/18 04:32 PM
2

Tell the body positive feminists that.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 04:09 PM
17

I as an American believe in innocence until proven guilt. Being accused doesn’t equal being proven guilty. The feminists and msm have forgotten that. I’ve never seen anybody on this sub act like all accusations are false, but they shouldn’t be treated as fact until the facts are proven in court.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:50 PM
1

Yeah I bet he's pretty stressed out with a custody battle going on, we shouldnt jump on the hate bandwagon. But if he wants his side of the story known, he needs to make it known or else he's going to keep getting bashed by the media. I read that the parents gave him $1100 to fix his car or something, and he took the money and used it on something else (could be lawyer fees for the custody battle or could be $1100 worth of pixie stix). We may never know.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 04:07 PM
3

But he refuses to work. That's kinda shitty. Even with all his stuff going on, he could still find time for a part time job just to help his parents out.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:57 PM
2

You're just confused. You get that reaction AFTER consensual sex because maybe you weren't that great in bed and finished too soon.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:59 PM
5

Then got accused of rape even though she gave her consent.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:34 PM
1

Yeah that's pretty fucked up
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:57 PM
4

lol I frankly don't care about if someone is bald, and I'm aware of the double standard. I just wanted to make a space hair loss joke since Elon is all about that mars life.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:06 PM
5

Gotta get that exclusive Mars Rogaine
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:33 PM
4

Inb4 dude is cleared of the crime for being hung like a horse
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:10 PM
6

You caught me, I think suicide is bad in nearly every circumstance, and discussing how men need to leave a cash tip for the discoverer of their body is about as far from suicide condemnation as you can get. Your tangent about rape apologists is irrelevant. Suicide isn't a spectrum like sexual assault. There are different levels of sexual assault and our courts recognize that. There aren't different levels of suicide. Sexual assault can exist as harassment and as intercourse against consent. Curr…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 02:33 AM
8

True. I'm not denying that. But this post is basically condoning suicide, as long as it's clean. That's pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:41 AM
38

Sure let's feel bad for the maid. "It's ok if you wanna kill yourself men, just don't make a mess"
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:12 PM
6

I do. I'm not even Mormon, but if thousands of young boys are losing an opportunity to learn valuable skills, you can bet your left nut that MRM will support them. Just bc you don't agree with Mormonism doesn't mean those boys don't need support
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:39 PM
1

Well it may not be a woman, but are you saying it's ok for men to be objectified like that? We say it's not okay to tell women how to look, but people can tell us how to look? And I don't think it's ridiculous. She probably stumbled across the pics of the guy without knowing the context and then used them as a before and after of shaving a beard when it was before and after of growing a beard. She (and I say she because most guys don't care if other guys grow beards) was too stupid or too lazy t…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 12:26 AM
2

That's the point mr mod. The photos were displayed in the opposite order they were taken, in order to make it seem like he shaved and became more attractive. In reality, the guy had gone through chemo, and then grown the beard. He didn't have a beard, then grew one because he wanted to. Then the woman posted the pics as if he had a beard and then shaved it off. That's why it's called "fake" because the female manipulated the order of the pics to further her idea that men look better without a be…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:20 PM
-1

Don't get mad at me then ladies when I tell you your hairy pits and legs are gross. Seriously ladies just shave it off
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:26 PM
1

Sounds like men Or Sounds like SOME men? That's the fucking issue here. Just like saying "ALL Asians are bad drivers" (not that I believe it, just a common example) is racist. You're taking a characteristic an individual has (rape/bad driving) and applying it to a group that that this person is supposed to represent (men/Asians). Does bill Cosby and what he did represent all men? Only if Andrea Yates can also represent all women.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:03 PM
4

Yeah I made this username after being banned from a sub for saying I think some racist jokes are funny. Not actually saying a joke, but just saying I think they are funny. Now that's outta the way, care to explain your comment? If you're scared of public scrutiny you can message me, but I'm sure it'll be full of the usual man hating and emotion driven responses that I see from a lot of leftists about things like this.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 10:57 PM
8

Seems blatantly sexist, care to explain what you mean?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 08:51 PM
3

Yeah... he's aware of it being the same deal on Google. That's why he tested bing
/r/MensRights07/05/18 08:48 PM
2

Yeah idk what he's on about, but I must ask this, what do you think is the correct course of action when a mother/father disagree on whether to abort? If the father can't veto it, then he ultimately has no say in the matter, the woman can just ignore his position. If the father can veto it, then the woman gets no say in the matter and the man can just ignore her position.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 09:40 AM
4

While it is weird, and I probably wouldn't masturbate in front of some coworkers or employees even if I had their consent, and while you agree he shouldn't be blacklisted, we just have to look at the facts. Everyone consented, he masturbated, he was blacklisted. The first 2 make sense, but that last step is perplexing as hell.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:14 PM
12

I disagree. Everyone there was an adult with full agency and they chose to say yes. Sexual interaction between consenting adults isn't a reason to be blacklisted. All he did was masturbate in front of consenting adults. How is it inappropriate? It'd be inappropriate if they said no and he did it anyways.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:27 PM
1

You take a girl to dinner, listen to all her problems, then you are paying for kisses.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:17 PM
2

You must not be good in bed if that's ALL you observe...
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:15 PM
12

That should be end of story but somehow it's not
/r/MensRights30/04/18 02:48 PM
4

Looks like the doctors claimed the baby was a girl, then performed a c section to get the baby out. They saw it was a boy and then cut his penis off claiming it was indeed a girl, just deformed. The baby later died as a result. This seems to be what is alleged at least. A huge question is if these "doctors" were actually qualified doctors or not in the first place.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 09:03 PM
4

Then why'd you reply? ;)
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:55 AM
5

lol I'll never know? Pretty sure we already know. Have fun assuming things and making fun of strangers on the internet through the anonymity of your computer screen. Have a nice day
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:27 AM
7

Jesus Christ, all these hypotheticals. What if the the dad was kidnapped by the ladies mother, so he kidnapped the ladies son, brainwashed him, and then elves kidnapped the boy. Then, what if the woman and man had to set aside their differences and team up, traveling all the way to Mordor to confront Voldemort and save the kid. What if, after a gruesome battle, they were victorious, but couldn't agree on who should raise the kid, so the cops were called after he hit her in the face? Or is your s…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:18 AM
2

V e r y C a r e f u l l y
/r/MensRights24/04/18 04:30 AM
7

I'm totally glad that things are going well in this area, but I pray to God I never have to know or be someone that undergoes this, because it sounds extremely traumatic.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:47 PM
17

Holy shit. Over 1/4 million dollars salary for being divorced. Gimme a couple days to wrap my head around this
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:47 PM
1

Also curious, I'm led to believe it's just in general from the way he words it, but it is definitely a little ambiguous
/r/MensRights23/04/18 04:23 PM
1

To obsess over what a woman looks like naked is different than acknowledging that a woman is attractive. I agree with you
/r/MensRights23/04/18 04:20 PM
4

Idk. The young woman didn't choose to be raped, why would the rapist get to choose his punishment?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:27 PM
1

I get what you are saying, but my point is it'd get parlayed into "he didn't cut my hair right because he's a man" and the issue never really ends
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:41 PM
1

Still waiting
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:38 PM
1

Then they get sued for malpractice
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:30 PM
6

And when it's the other way around, I'm sure it becomes some form of sexual harassment
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:13 PM
1

I'm not saying what she did was ok. It's definitely illegal. And it was honestly an accident. She was just messing around with him and ya know, it's all fun and games until someone gets tazed. It was for like .25 seconds and he wasn't hurt, just shocked like we all were
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:02 PM
0

My mom tazed my little brother once. He was like 16 at the time. However, he was a little asshole and I don't wanna be that guy, but maybe a good tazing was what he needed lol. And in defense of my dad, he wasn't scared to slap the shit out of us for doing something stupid. Nobody is perfect
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:20 PM
9

I mean, what if your parents decided you don't need your thumbs? You are a baby and can't decide for yourself, but because your parents made that decision, you have to live the rest of your life without thumbs. Wouldn't you wanna stop the unnecessary amputation of baby thumbs? These babies can CHOOSE to have their thumbs removed when they grow up, and if they choose not to, that should be fine. But making an irreversible decision for a child without his input, that's abuse. No matter how you sha…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:15 PM
1

Well if you don't think a blowjob is sex, then this lady shouldn't be called a sex offender. That's using your own logic
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:56 PM
12

Punctuation would likely help me lol. It looks like one huge run on sentence
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:55 AM
1

Well then you agree this person shouldn't be called a sex offender? Quit arguing semantics here, if you blow a child, you are a sex offender, meaning you did a sexual act with a child. So yes, in the context of "surely sex with a child is illegal", I do think that "sex" in this instance should also encompass sexual acts such as sodomy or oral, because these will all earn the label "sex offender"
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:54 AM
14

Wtf
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:09 AM
1

In the context of "surely sex with a child is illegal", I would definitely include handjobs and blowjobs as "sex"
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:39 AM
2

Idk, Michigan gave us Greta Van Fleet. That's worth some bonus points
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:22 PM
2

Oral sex...
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:21 PM
2

Oh I believe that, it's a wonder my dad won full custody (long drawn out legal battle) but I just chalk it up to that particular judge or maybe my specific region being a rare example of non bias, if even only in my case. I definitely know it's not the norm, but the OP asked and my situation seems to apply pretty well to what he asked, aside from the nonmarried part
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:57 PM
1

So my dad had nothing to do with them dropping the amount, even though they just arrested my mom, and she wasn't off the hook until my dad went to the courthouse. So while my dad doesn't decide, his opinion definitely affected the outcome. You are saying that even if my dad did nothing, they would still forgive the amount after they arrested her? That doesn't seem accurate. If my dad went to the courthouse demanding the 14k, they'd still let my mom off the hook cuz she's a woman? That seems inac…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:26 PM
1

I'm not super knowledgeable on the whole ordeal, but I was just pointing out how the cops did indeed come looking for my mother of their own accord, my dad didn't set it up. And it wasn't forgiven because she was a woman, it was because my dad said he didn't need/want her money. If he wouldn't have said that, she'd still likely be in deep trouble. As much as they seemed to hate each other as I was growing up, it meant a lot to me to see him have mercy on her. It was a good lesson for me to learn…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:29 PM
1

Idk, my parents divorced when I was a child and my dad got full custody, mom had to pay child support for 3 kids. A few years later, she owes $14,000 and cops show up at her work to arrest her in front of everyone (she was a waitress at a formal restaurant). My dad had to go to the courthouse and tell the judge or whatever that he didn't need her money to raise us (he had gone back to college and gotten a good job in the meantime) and they finally let her off the hook and said she wasn't liable …
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:51 PM
1

You sourced yourself already. You said "in 4 states and Puerto Rico, men DO NOT have the right"
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:04 PM
7

I'm not a feminist...
/r/MensRights04/04/18 06:35 PM
8

You missed the whole point of this post, and it doesn't surprise me. When Dave Chappelle makes more money on Netflix specials than amy schumer, it's gotta be because he is male and she is female. Even though in real life, he is immensely more famous than her, so he gets paid more. But the feminists say it's only because he is male. So when Katy perry is paid more than her male coworkers, the feminists won't say it's because she is female. They say it's because she is more qualified. So why can't…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:53 PM
9

You could, but you are just a patriarchal white male so your opinion is next to meaningless. Check your privilege and then try again /s
/r/MensRights03/04/18 04:10 PM
6

If this random person says that white school shooters lash out for not receiving what they feel they deserve, can we use this same logic against feminist and BLM "activists"? If the solution to keeping women and minorities from lashing out violently is to give them what they demand, then let's carry that same logic here. We can stop school shootings by just giving white men what they feel they deserve. Of course this is all backwards. This person thinks that all school shooters are motivated by …
/r/MensRights22/03/18 05:55 PM
3

lol I obviously don't believe in matriarchy, I was taking the "blow things out of proportion" stance that a lot of feminists take. Because when the AC is too cold, it's sexist against women and conducive to patriarchy. So we could easily turn the tables on them seeing stories like this. I actually think men and women are very equal in today's society, the media just won't accept it. I edited quotes in around matriarchy so it wouldn't come across as literal.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 04:16 PM
3

I guess 3 hours of silence is kinda funny
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:43 PM
9

It's just another clear example of biased media. Nothing to get up in arms about, but these headline comparisons do help build the case that we live in a "matriarchy". But we have lives to live, so instead of protesting these things in the street, we post about it on Reddit to collectively face palm at the state of affairs.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:37 PM
23

He's not too young? I hate to have to spell this out for you. He is 5. He hasn't hit puberty. He literally has zero sexual motivation. But all these people in that thread are saying it's sexual assault. Should he keep his hands to himself? Yes Should the girl be taught to slap him as hard as possible? No If it was the girl chasing the boy, would it be sexual assault? No If the boy slapped the girl for touching him, would they say he was defending himself or that he is a boy and therefore overly …
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:58 PM
2

Women can't be sexist? Wow I was raised believing a woman can be anything she wants and her gender doesn't matter. But now feminists are saying women can't do things because they are women. Women are sexist against women. The feminists are cannibalizing themselves.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:20 PM
8

Oh god that's gross. I don't wanna think about your ugly ass blue waffle getting buzzed on you gross whale.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:15 PM
36

On top of all this, calling someone by the wrong pronoun (even by mistake) is considered gender based harassment and is a violation of the Ontario Human Rights Commission. What the actual fuck... I'm praying for you Canada
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:11 PM
0

Well sorry for having a piece of info included that was agreed on by several people earlier. They agree more on that than the other woman who commented to me that you are concerned about. But you are acting like I just made that shit up. And I didn't. So fuck off with calling me stupid. I have NO idea how these attacks are happening because I live in America and I don't use public transportation. So when someone says these things happen with people holding knives and then people agree with that,…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:11 AM
-1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/836auy/comment/dvfswbl?st=JEKR9R37&sh=d01a8f4b Posted before I ever mentioned knives. This is why I've been mentioning them. I don't frankly give a fuck the rest of the shit you typed because my point still stands. This goes hand in hand with women only transit. You are just creating a space where a criminal has free reign over potential victims. If you don't agree with me that's fine. I'm not the one that created the idea of knife wielding assailants…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:34 AM
0

Did I say it doesn't happen ever? You immediately assumed that I don't believe you when I never said that. My only point is that it's harder to combat fake falling because it is nearly impossible to prove. Having different color seats on a CRAMPED bus won't stop people from falling onto other people. Because someone standing in the aisle could fall onto a woman in a pink seat whether on purpose or accident. I'm sorry you've been groped. I believe you that it happens. But I'm not convinced pink s…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:30 AM
-1

But in India we aren't discussing intentional vs accident. We've already established that it's guys with knives threatening women that's the problem in India. This random person came in talking about people acting like they are falling, never specified it was India. Woman talking about intentional falling for gropings is completely different than a guy taking a knife to your throats and threatening your life.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 10:40 PM
1

I do believe women, my only point in that post is that you CANT prove in front of court whether or not that person actually fell or fake fell. So we can't know if the groping was intentional on a level clear enough to face a conviction. I don't want women being groped no matter how "easy" it is to get away with. But that also doesn't mean any man should be arrested for falling on a woman. Because there's no way to know. Did he just want a tit grab or does he have a bad ankle? Defense attorneys w…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:42 PM
0

What's unreasonable is the chance of being groped in the first place. Don't tell me that women are getting groped nonstop but having them defend themselves is unreasonable... it's unreasonable to think that women should give up control of their bodies before fighting back against an assailant. It's unreasonable to leave your safety in the hands of a seat of a specific color.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:28 PM
6

Not at all the discussion I'm having. Other person said these guys have a knife in hand and threaten the woman telling her to shut up and deal with it or die. That's different from what you are saying. I mean, how are you gonna stop people from lying? And how do you tell when it's someone really falling and someone fake falling? And this literally wouldn't help that. If the busses are so cramped, then people will be mostly standing... even standing next to pink seats. Then the driver hits a poth…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:22 PM
3

They should do something. I agree. I think they should promote conceal carry. Like you said, it's a crime of opportunity. The opportunity is there because they know women won't defend themselves. If these women had access to self defense weaponry, we would be seeing more "sexual assault suspect found dead on bus" And less "another sexual assault has taken place on this bus"
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:17 PM
6

But someone else mentioned this above "What about couples" Is the man supposed to leave his wife or girlfriend to sit alone while he goes to the back because if some random guy looks at him sitting next to his wife, with this new rule it seems as if he would be trying to assault her. Like honestly, shouldn't personal protection be a personal responsibility? Are women not allowed to defend themselves in India? Can women own firearms? I bet if every groping had a possibility that the assailant wou…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:11 PM
4

Will this help combat sexual assault? Maybe. Maybe not. Will it help as much as having security guards? No. This seems like a lazy attempt at fighting sexual assault by using as little resources as possible. I mean the idea doesn't even sound good. Multiple women come forward saying they've been groped on the bus. So the gov or bus company think about it and then submit this as an answer "Pink seats should fix this right up" Like no. It's just gonna be a more decorative setting for sexual assaul…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:06 PM
7

"Aren't allowed" These people are CRIMINALS THEY DONT CARE WHATS ALLOWED GROPING ISNT ALLOWED BUT THEY STILL DO IT IF SITTING NEAR A WOMAN ISNT ALLOWED, WHY WOULD THEY FOLLOW THAT RULE BUT NOT THE GROPING RULE
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:53 PM
4

How does a seat cover stop someone from going near a woman ? Is he gonna say "id love to grope that woman but she's 5 feet away, it's impossible for me to walk up to her"? Likely not. He's just gonna do what he wants
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:51 PM
1

A 50 cent seat cover won't keep Omar from copping a feel off of unsuspecting women. In fact, Omar will be more likely to grope because he can get on one of these busses or whatever and have an all you can grope buffet.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:33 PM
-16

Just like gun free zones prevent shootings... HA
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:30 PM
16

"How International Men's day is systematically sexist and propagates patriarchy"
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:13 PM
5

Well we all know that no woman anywhere ever wants to have sex, so even when it's consensual, they'll just call it harassment 15 years later and be called brave for allowing an alleged sexual predator to live life in the general public for so long without ever filing a police report.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 03:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter