~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gynocentrism Exposed: MIT Acceptance RatesKey word: "any STEM program they wanted". It's also difficult to account for below average candidates, and there is little reason to expect a below average candidate to displace an average candidate. When you're comparing apples to apples, you're pretty much looking at who's the better writer, which yeah, might be another factor playing into why below average women get picked over below average men. Additionally, admissions rates have a lot to do with pool sizes and identities. By your logic, th… | /r/MGTOW | 26/05/17 01:22 AM |
| 2 | Gynocentrism Exposed: MIT Acceptance RatesThat depends, did they actually achieve the testing marks and other necessary criteria? Given that we're comparing them to boys who worked hard and scraped/exceeded the necessary grades and tests, I was also referring to girls who also acquired or exceeded the necessary statistics. Maybe back in your day such girls had easy admission to any STEM program they wanted, but that is definitely not the case now. tl;dr: I never said it was "easy" for a girl to get into MIT, but pretending it is anywher… | /r/MGTOW | 23/05/17 04:35 PM |
| 1 | Gynocentrism Exposed: MIT Acceptance RatesYes, I do realize that. MIT humanities are highly ranked, and many students get involved in them regardless of their primary major. And you do realize that there are lots of males enrolled in those too? Sloan is half male, and the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences is ~45% male (the gender ratios in the School of HASS has has almost always been around 1:1). That's what...<10 more girls than boys in those programs? If you omitted everyone in humanities from the graduation rate calcul… | /r/MGTOW | 23/05/17 04:19 PM |
| 2 | Gynocentrism Exposed: MIT Acceptance RatesSure, sometimes women join STEM and then drop out, especially when you're recruiting out of women who've never really invested in STEM or looking at women who are pressured to drop their careers for their families. Your visions of a sad boy rejected for his gender alone is nowhere as common or straightforward as you think, and frankly isn't well thought out at all. MIT isn't recruiting women willy nilly--it selects female applicants who already have a history of interest in STEM (eg: awards in s… | /r/MGTOW | 23/05/17 12:29 AM |
| 1 | Gynocentrism Exposed: MIT Acceptance RatesTo be fair, MIT recruits ambitious people who'd give everything to be there (and this applies to people of all genders and demographics) and puts in a lot of effort into keeping said people emotionally stable. Fudging the numbers...Probably not. Claremont McKenna, a much smaller liberal arts school with less fame, came under HUGE fire a while back for fudging SAT scores, so I would predict a huge blowout scandal if MIT, which is more well known, fudged their graduation rates. | /r/MGTOW | 22/05/17 06:29 PM |
| 1 | Gynocentrism Exposed: MIT Acceptance RatesMight be the case for your former place. MIT graduation rates beg to differ. http://web.mit.edu/ir/pop/students/graduation_rates.html | /r/MGTOW | 22/05/17 05:29 PM |
| 1 | Gynocentrism Exposed: MIT Acceptance RatesLooks like women have a higher graduation rate than men. http://web.mit.edu/ir/pop/students/graduation_rates.html | /r/MGTOW | 22/05/17 05:28 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter