TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MonkeyTeals Archive

View 0 posts and 200 comments by MonkeyTeals on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Reddit does not represent everyone in the US. Especially when those likes can be from other people from different counties. 4B, in the USA, will mostly just affect liberal and/or neutral men. If even that, because again, only some will be doing this. Conservative, and Republican men have women within their own parties to date. They're not going to want to date women in this, if they have others who have similar views.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 06:00 AM
0

Trans men are men. Supported by studies (esp on the brains). If they identify as men, they're men. Sure, they're not cis men, but they're men nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 07:34 PM
1

Yes, but not all afab identify as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 07:25 PM
–

No one is obligated to disclose anything. Is it nice? Sure, but not obligated and isn't the same as lying. The only exception is STDs, for justified reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 07:21 PM
2

There's also that aspect (IVF). I was just referring to OP stating it's a gendered issue because only women give birth. When that isn't the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 07:19 PM
1

I haven't seen any fellow survivors in the comment section, so I'll put my two cents in: No. Not even close. Lying about his age (within AOC), singleness, career, etc. Isn't equal to rape or sexual abuse. It's just scummy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 08:27 AM
1

The trans aesthetic isn’t attractive and if you have sex with someone and don’t tell them your gender you’re a rapist and creep Yeah, no. Lying and not disclosing aren't the same thing. Trans people aren't lying about who they are. They aren't obligated to disclose, especially out of protection. Alongside this, being trans isn't a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 08:11 AM
6

It wouldn't work. Some women voted for Trump. Even in SK, it's not as big, but known because of how different it is due to issues there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 07:53 AM
3

Women are simps for love and babies, and always have been Some, not all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 07:44 AM
-1

Trans men, and other genders that are afab are though. Cis women make up the most, but others still exist and are still affected by anti choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 07:43 AM
4

Everyone has the right to walk away from marriage. Women, men, NBs, etc. Plus, people can still love each other without needing a piece of paper to show that. Marriages is good if you want benefits. Children can still have that without their parents being married. The main objective (if even that) is two parent household. Get a better job. That's not men's responsibility. While true, according to statistics, that's their choice at the end of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 11:37 PM
1

The same thing. Unless, you're in a traditional relationship (which for that, if she's a housewife, she'll still be bringing something to the table).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 11:31 PM
1

Unless, I'm suspicious that he is cheating because there are signs, then yes. But, if I could find evidence without it? No. But, otherwise? No again. If he cheats one time, while he's on vacation, that I never know of? Idc. I wouldn't know lol. Unless, he brings back an STD, child, or there's other evidence of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 03:06 PM
1

"Grape" survivor here. I would be owning a gun regardless if I could.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 02:54 PM
1

Keep trying... If that doesn't work? Give up. Or try dating a blind girl, mail-order bride, sex robot, or get a sex worker if he just wants sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 02:52 PM
1

Believe what you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 02:36 PM
0

If they're prepared and can care for a child? Sure. But, that's the thing. Being able to do so. I'm fine with single parents (or couples) who can care for the children they have. It's people who decide to have kids, especially multiple, who can't take care of them but still have them? That's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:21 AM
1

I know econmic and logistical aspects (raised by a single mom) but I imagine adopting would be even more difficult for want-to-be single fathers. Or just single parents in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 10:25 PM
6

Ah, got ya. I'm just saying, because last time I recall (maybe it changed), it's harder to adopt when single. Probably even more as a man. But, maybe that changed or isn't the same where you live.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:51 PM
–

Trans men are men. Genital preference does not reduce that. Also then surely putting on a hoodie and forgetting the body you’re in is more bearable than never not being sexually desirable whatsoever Maybe for the very some. But, most rather take being themselves. Especially when there are people who would and do date trans men. Plus, find them sexually desirable. Cis, and trans.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:50 PM
–

Some, not all. Just some gay men also have high standards. But, there's also been some issues when it comes to dating (or just sex) from what I've seen in the gay community. When it comes to gay trans men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:39 PM
2

That's nice to hear! Have you tried dating/interest in traditional women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:32 PM
12

Whether I’m prepared or not doesn’t matter That does matter. How would you support the needs of a child when struggling? Would you, instead, give the child up for adoption?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:30 PM
–

Did you know that some trans males, are gay (ie: like men)? They did mentioned that. But, apparently thinks that would be "easier" dating. So, heterosexual trans men shouldn't transition, but gay trans men can...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:28 PM
–

Well then.. First, bisexual man. Now this. Trans men shouldn't not transition just because dating would be slightly harder. Plus, trans man being "appalling" probably has to do with transphobia too. Not just simple attraction (NOT that is an issue. Genital preferences exist. But there's a difference between that, and thinking "trans men aren't real men"). There is T4T too btw. As for "never fully become male"... Explain. Detailed please. Also, gay trans men also struggle to date. So, in order fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:26 PM
1

Yes, I know that. That's why I was talking about/referring to myself, because extreme sex positive (and negative) people pull this same thing on me. That I "cannot consent" because I' m disinterested on sex. But WILL consent if my partner wanted to have sex. Why I talk about "explicit consent" could possibly be a better alternative. Edit: then you proceeded to tell me that you would feel like you were a "failure" if your son was my partner so... People have their own rules, boundaries, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:13 PM
1

What about sex with someone who's disinterested about sex? But, still willing to have sex with their partner? Or, sex work?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 08:06 AM
1

It's a disinterest with sex. Something some asexual and sex neutral people have. But, we can have sex with our partners for multiple reasons (and as some asexuals say, it's akin to giving a massage).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 07:55 AM
1

Sure, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 03:29 AM
1

I feel bad for the son who wholly listens to their parents' rules for relationships. Apparently, those rules are golden and is the only right one that works for all. Instead of his partner, and communicating with what works for both. Edit: and as I said in my previous comment. Asexual people exist. Sex neutral people too. Both can and are willing to have sex with their partners. It's similar to a massage. Either way, consent is consent. Coerced "consent" isn't. Explicit consent is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 03:25 AM
2

OH. Sorry, I thought you were against it (for whatever reason. Didn't read it correctly).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:25 PM
0

I explained myself in my other comment to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:23 PM
1

I know that. I'm just stating my opinion on the term. I've told people my case before, and they tell me I'm NOT consenting. Plus, try to enforce me to use the term. Plus, the other examples I used. So... 🤷🏽‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:21 PM
2

We mature faster, doesn't mean we're mind readers. Someone can teach themselves to be seen as completely normal, but be different behind closed doors. There's manipulation, coercion, death (or SA threats), etc. That could keep someone from leaving. Also, men probably do get as much abuse as woman. But, they're not likely to speak out about it because they're told to "man up". Edit: similar to SA against men. It's not taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:18 PM
-3

Women DO mature faster than men. Especially, mentally. It's just what it is. The supposed "full brain development" is at 25. But, women can mature faster than that. Plus, this is generalization. Development varies, and some can go past 25, and straight to the 30s. As for age gap relationships? Who the F cares? As long as it's two legal adults. Don't like it? Don't get into one (not singling you out OP, this is just in general). Should there be risks mentioned? Yes. But, that can be said for all …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:01 PM
3

Some people of all genders watch porn. Some don't. It's not just men lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 01:57 PM
1

I don't oppose either. Just make porn safe/regulated, and teach ACCURATE risks of it. Imagination? Go wild. Just, if it's maybe too wild, separate to separate fiction and reality (unless you can practice it RACK).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 01:55 PM
-1

Adam. I rather him get help (actual help/advice, maybe a therapist to help with social awkwardness. Since apparently, he must have gotten that from his mom). Caleb can go kick rocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 01:53 PM
2

Anyone can be coerced into saying anything. But, I'm referring to someone actually saying they're consenting, regardless of the scenario. Like, for example, for me. I'm disinterested but I would participate in it for bonding. This can be said the same for some asexuals and/or sex work. But, some people believe I'm not actually consenting.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 11:04 PM
2

I don't express "enthusiastic consent." I just express consent to the act. I'm disinterested, but am okay with doing it. Edit: had to change some words since some can't understand what I mean...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 06:46 PM
0

I understand OP to an extent, but for different reasons (?). I'm disinterested in sex, but, if my partner wanted to have sex? Sure. By the term of "enthusiastic consent," or some of these people who enforce it on others, I'm probably seen as not consenting. This is why I use "explicit consent" (at most. I just use consent, because I don't need extra words). But, not everything is black/white. This my example, there's some asexual people are disinterested in sex but still do for their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 06:44 PM
0

Explicit consent would be better.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 06:41 PM
1

But, it's not really black/white. I'm disinterested, but if my partner wants to? I have no issue with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 06:40 PM
3

Personally, I've seen more women say was degrading. Rather than men. As for the story/example, it's less of a "punishment," and more about just having a booty call and not getting attached. Especially when you wanna leave afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 05:49 PM
3

One of the views of homophobia too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 05:47 PM
2

More humans = more workers, voters, and taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 09:28 PM
1

Only men who can are trans men (alongside afab identities), but 100% yeah lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 09:28 PM
1

The mother (or trans parent) carrying has all rights over their body. If they wish to abort, within the time frame, that is their right. For any reason. I would even go as far as to say ALL reasons. Gender, disability, don't want it, etc. If we consider fetuses human, I would still believe the same. The person, with an established life and identity, has the right. As for rights of the man (or amab parent), the only right they should get is knowing, and exiting out of the relationship. Other righ…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 09:26 PM
1

Neurodivergent or not, alone. I don't want kids at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:39 PM
2

Most women complaining about men going to date younger women are younger women themselves. Now, is there some older? Yes. But, most people within my age group and a bit younger, are the ones complaining. Now, should it be an issue? No, but that's the reality to it. Most complaining are younger women themselves. Even if they haven't dated an older man. Marriage meaning nothing is good (imo). It allows people to not rush into it, forced to marry, and divorce when it isn't working. Divorce should b…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:26 PM
6

Basically all women see male virgins are unattractive because their unattractiveness is precisely why they are virgins in the first place. You keep stating all women, when it's not all women. It's some women. We aren't a monolith. Just as virgins aren't a monolith either. False Some female virgins don't get interest from men. Edit: Elliot Rodger was a virgin. He also had money. Some women found him attractive, but he still didn't lose it because of his personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 01:01 AM
7

Not all women see male virgins as unattractive. There are other reasons to why these women wouldn't want them. Being unattractive isn't the sole reason(s). Could it be for some women? Certainly! But, not all. Not all female virgins get sexual interest from men. It can also have its reasons. Either way, virgins aren't the same as rape survivors. Some rape survivors can still have sex and/or get into relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:22 AM
3

I don't believe she would stoop this low. But honestly, I don't mind her posts. It's different, compared to the repetitive stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:10 AM
14

Wtf? No, the equivalent of male virgins are female virgins. Men who are virgins past a certain age aren't wanted due to their lack of sexual/relationship experience, personal baggage, and because they're likely deficient in something that made others not attracted to them. There are multiple reasons that a man (or woman) could still be a virgin. Religion, traditional (waiting for marriage), not interested, etc. While rape survivors do have trauma, which can affect an relationship, it's not the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:07 AM
–

Ick. I'm just repeating what some of the sub believes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 08:43 PM
2

Fiction. Almost like what people want in fiction, can be very different in reality. Also, the feminist movement doesn't represent all women. Another "issue" (and I put quotations, because was the writer trying to represent it as accurate?) 50 Shades of Grey was with the BDSM movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 08:38 PM
5

Pretty much. With fiction, doesn't matter. Reality? As long as there's consent, it shouldn't matter. I mean, there's some scenarios, where it might genuinely be concerning, even when consent is involved. But, one less thing to worry about is if there was lack of consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 08:28 PM
–

I'm not giving an exact percentage, but I say majority of men wouldn't. An majority of people wouldn't. As for the study, this is one (?). Not multiple studies confirming similar findings.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 08:14 PM
–

There really shouldn't be a stigma. Maybe caution. But, as long as it's consenting adults, not much we can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:59 PM
–

People aren't allowed to judge preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:55 PM
1

If he wants an escort, or even a prostitute, sure. Why not? But, I wouldn't surprise him with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 03:50 PM
2

Of course I would discuss with anyone I'm dating, I know what the expectations are for modern dating. I made it very clear I was dating for marriage and wasn't going to put out anytime soon. Understandable. Friendships are great. When they're wanted on both sides. whole 'you're my male BFF, love you!', it's ridiculously childish. Very true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 06:05 PM
3

Your definition of child porn. There's only 2 types of child porn. Including things that aren't it into the definition, waters down the importance and seriousness of it. Alongside, comparing csa/cocsa survivors' trauma to cartoons.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 06:02 PM
1

Unrelated to post, I find it amusing that people dislike Windmill just because of the posts. One of the (many) people who do at least try to make entertaining (intentionally or not) posts. Not the same boring crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:55 PM
1

Involves money, gifts, etc in exchange for sex imo. If you go up to someone, with no one stating to bring something for exchange and then take them back to x place to have sex. Then it's not prostitution. For your example, I would say it's borderline prostitution? It's not a typical scenario, but since she is willing to have sex in exchange for gift cards, it feels borderline.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:54 PM
2

It's not feminists that argue against p*rn. It's pretty much majority of the population, because they see the negative effects of it in front of their eyes. Who is this majority you write of? Majority watches, draws, reads, etc porn. They only have issues when there's evidence of abuse in specific works, when it involves living/real people in it. Not all relationships involve sex. It's completely fine for someone to masturbate, with or without the help of porn. As for the last bit, all depends o…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:44 PM
1

It's just some how het/bi women are. But, some women are sentimental, some are not. Same with guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:34 PM
1

When women are dating it’s about weather they can see a future with that specific man or not. It’s not about if there is a “hotter”, richer or whatever other metric you want to consider man out there. We both know that's false. There are certainly het/bi women like that out there. Same with men. (Replied to different comment, but didn't want to just mash everything into one).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:29 PM
10

True, and It is best for the relationship to end. No use staying in one like that. She goes to date someone else, and he can find a woman (or man) who wants to be with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:25 PM
2

All these redpils will be running for their lives mad that you're wasting their time. If it's not discussed, it would be understandable to be upset. It is wasting time. Reminds me of the relationship vs friendship. Friendships aren't bad, but if one person wants more than that, they're justified in leaving the person who just wanted to be friends. That's a waste of time. Although, both should be honest. That would save time too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 09:14 AM
1

Be a little biased, it's fine. Just don't be an asshole to people about it, and simply avoid whoever you don't like. Nobody is owed your time and attention, you're free to hang around whoever you choose Don't be an asshole is a big one to remember. But, I would think it would fair to equalize, and extend to other areas too (jobs, some public places, etc). Just to not enable hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 08:45 AM
2

lgbtq+ accounts ... Women if they disagree it's usually just snarky or bitchy You haven't met straight (or other) women then. Homophobic hetero females can be just as nasty as straight men when it comes to lgbt. Notably, lgbt+ men. Either way, that's simply the curse of anonymity. It allows people to say what they want, with their face not being attached to it. At that point, simply don't trust anyone (this is the internet too). You cannot assume their gender, because it could be anyone. Cis fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 08:40 AM
4

God forbid people aren't allowed to draw child porn, porn including bestiality or incest. "Child porn" is only such when containing hyperrealism, and/or based on a real child. So, are you referring to actual child porn or cartoons? If it isn't based on the 2 examples, it's not child porn. It's cartoons. Pixels, paints, lines, etc. Pure fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 08:25 AM
4

This is not all women. Just straight ones. Some are just like that. Bisexual ones too. But, you won't go to jail just for saying hi. You'll be shrilled at, depending how dramatic the woman is. No jail though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 08:14 AM
1

Being overweight (and/or obese) Narcissistic High body count Bitchy attitude Little to none sex drive Sex worker
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 08:09 AM
2

Yes. But, women are more subtle about it. Whereabouts men are more upfront about it. Mostly cishet (and cisbisexual) women too. Especially when it comes to certain topics like GNC, LGBT+, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 07:43 PM
1

Some, not all. I don't care for it, and I don't care if other women objectify/sexualize themselves. Their choice. Women aren't a monolith.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 12:56 AM
1

Especially sexual assault victims. Seeing women dress as children, play out rape scenes, etc. Some, not all. I don't care for what adults do. As long as it doesn't involve actual children, rape scenes, etc. Some fellow survivors use it themselves as coping mechanisms/regaining their power.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 12:53 AM
–

Fiction and reality are two different things. What people like in fiction, would be different for real life. If someone cannot differ between the two, that's a personal problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 10:24 PM
–

Only people willing to do this would be in open relationships. Anyone else? Would have an issue with this, especially the husband. It would only work for open relationships. Other than that, it be cheating spouses.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 08:10 PM
–

Well, technology is trying to create artifical girlfriends. Maybe that could help?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 08:00 PM
–

I think you have it mixed up? Trans men transitioning to men. Trans women are the ones transitioning into to women. So, it would be easier for Trans women (it's not).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 07:59 PM
–

Sexual orientations, outside of straight men, also struggle. Lesbians are a small population. Gay men do have their own problems. Bisexual people (notably the men though) have to deal with stereotypes and crap from both LG and straight people. Sometimes, even within their own group. So, no. Straight men don't have the hardest when it comes to dating. When you take bisexual men, and lesbians into regard. Edit: Also, trans people too. Regardless, of their sexual orientations.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 07:54 PM
3

Personally, absolutely not. While there are the perks (to some women) of losing male attention, some do like that. As for me? It could be beneficial, but I still like being young lol. Even with the negatives to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:14 AM
–

Why does this sound like a reference to Baki the Grappler? Either way, no lol. Man's too tall. That's too much man to handle (/j). Edit: Yep. That was a reference lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:09 AM
1

Yea. Same people saying "gross" would probably be hypocritical too. Either way, I can understand the questioning (but for other reasons). Not the same, but dealing with men who fetishized me before has made me questioned preferences. So, seeing some complain about the "audacity" to question is funny. If someone gets defensive, just run for the hills tbh. They're not worth the time, respect, resources, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:06 AM
–

Personally, I don't think the man's insecure. Especially, since there are cases like this before. Even more so, if he does have suspicions his partner is/was cheating on him. It's similar to having no child, but still wondering if you're partner is cheating. I wouldn't think the person is insecure. As for "waste of taxes"? Taxes are already being wasted on crap lol. At least with this, it could save both men and children. Men, so they don't have to support a child that isn't theirs. Children who…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:00 AM
–

Native American women would've been a LOT happier. Past and present women. Can't say the same for the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 08:58 PM
1

Nothing. I don't really care. Only exceptions are if he groomed this girl prior to her being 18, then that's an issue. If not? I don't care. It was in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 08:55 PM
1

Grooming as in he was started before she was 18 correct? no compassion for young people If they're adults, they get treated like everyone else. They're not children anymore. So, all adults deserve compassion or not imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 08:52 PM
2

Huh? Do you know all attractive men around the world? While yes, it is possible some don't love, there's also some who do and have married to one woman. Same goes for unattractive/decent/etc men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 08:49 PM
5

I mean, realistically, religion and cultures started this. Women are seen as "pure," and men are seen as sexual "savages." Outside of them, I usually see hetero/bisexual women who are like this. Which is hypocritical. Especially, since they're also some of the ones to whine about not stereotyping women. But, have no issue doing it to men (or any other groups).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 08:46 PM
2

The majority of women who say things like this I've seen are around my age and younger. Are there older women too? Sure, men too. Either way, they can date whoever they want. Idc, I have actual issues to deal with than two adults dating lol. Just ignore judgements, at most, her parent(s) might be most valid. Thry can use the "preference" logic too. They're sexually attracted to younger (and legal) women. Their preference shouldn't be questioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 09:11 PM
–

Not really lol. People can still go out, and about, learn how to adult. Some cultures have the extended family model. Nothing wrong with that. Plus, not everyone has a sex life. Or they could go their partners' house, hotels, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 01:27 AM
–

And that's completely fine!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 01:07 AM
–

Dealing with phobic, regressive people, now watching people having issues with others who don't have friends. I have friends. But, I wouldn't see someone who doesn't as a "red flag," especially with stereotypical bs. There's reasons someone might not have friends. I have an aunt. SAHM, with no friends, and there's nothing wrong with her. She just cares more about family, and likes being alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 01:06 AM
–

Different cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 12:59 AM
1

I did not say were, I said WANT to pay. Where I live (specifically the state), wants abortions to be helped paid for. Especially since some AFABs can't afford it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 12:49 AM
1

People change.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 04:47 PM
-1

The fuck to I have to pay for “their piece of mind”?! If some places want to have it so taxpayers are forced to pay for abortions, then extra money for this shouldn't be an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 04:39 PM
3

Wanna say yes, but optional. But, not for the man, but for the kids. There's cases where it's just as devastating when the kid (or turned adult) found out the hard way, and completely destroyed the family and trust in their mother. If it becomes optional, then happens later, if the man finds out the kid isn't his? He has every right to walk out, and not pay child support. Not his kid, not his problem. Now, if the kid is his and he doesn't want to pay child support? Tough luck, until something el…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 04:36 PM
1

Stereotypes. Not every male-attracted man has STDs or risk of it. Just like not all black people are criminals or have "higher chances" of committing, and lesbians are more prone to DV.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 10:35 PM
2

True.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 10:00 PM
0

Patterns. It's just like when people justifiably question the "preference" of older men who very specifically like 18 yr olds, white men with Asian men, cishet men with trans women, etc. Is it simply a preference or is it something else (ex fetishizing)? You can have a preference, without being prejudice. When it comes to LGBT-phobia, it's stereotypes. So, it's not hard to question if it's preference or something else. I've known very, very few hetero women reject friendship with gay or bi men b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 08:18 PM
1

If you have specific hobbies, you can try finding in-person groups for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:07 PM
14

Some men (and women) don't want to become friends. They want more than that. Be it just hook ups, and/or relationship. So, they don't wish to waste time, effort, and sometimes resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 06:57 PM
5

I wonder how this comment thread will turn out...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 05:32 PM
1

Wouldn't have to if you weren't being so keen on others calling out negative stereotypes that harm lives. Since you know, stereotypes have done that in past and present... what does "not getting to be phobic" Hun, you serious? Lol. Not being homophobic, biphobic, lesbophobic, transphobic, etc. Not stereotyping LGBT, being a ass to someone who has a different sexual and/or gender identity to you, etc. It's funny you keep assuming everyone is forcing people to date. That's not the issue, the issue…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:35 PM
1

It ain't "baby murder" lol. Nor women having a choice in what stays in their bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 12:56 PM
1

Thinking someone is riddled with STDs just because they're not straight (which is one of the many stereotypes) is actually disgusting. Someone calling that out isn't forcing women to date. Women's rights doesn't include getting the right to stereotype and be phobic. But, ex if I said I wouldn't date fellow women. Not because women aren't my type, as someone capable of being attracted to women, but becuase I think they're whores, attention seekers, drama, etc. That wouldn't be sexist?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 12:47 PM
1

And white women not dating black men is fine too? Not because black men aren't their preference, but think black men are xyz? If she wouldn't date black men, because she thinks they're criminals, would yoy see that as racist? Or perfectly justified? Because there's a difference between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 12:29 PM
1

An adult is someone at 18 (legal), supposedly 25 and above for brain development. Regardless if they have kids or not lol. Your logic sounds like a great way for a slippery slope to happen. You must dislike pro choice women. Considering pro choice helps CF women remain such lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:23 AM
1

kinda weird that you'd prioritize "the market" over the material needs of children. That is not the responsibility of CF people. If their parents can't afford their needs, they shouldn't be having them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:10 AM
0

Not everyone wants kids, nor should they be punished for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:08 AM
2

Yes, I would 100% support compensation for him. As for the accuser(s), they should be punished. For serious defamation, and watering down survivors' trauma for their bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 10:26 AM
–

Got it. Read the wiki too, hust remembered reading/watching videos on the case, and barely brought that up since they stated it was suspected/never confirmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 12:16 AM
3

Unless they're children and/or being forced into this, these are grown women who willingly participate in this. You're speaking for them without actually being there lol. Especially with that list. It just speaks benevolent racism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 12:10 AM
9

I forgot where, but I read this sonewhere: some people who don't want kids are the ones who need them. They're the ones more likely to have stable jobs, healthy environments, etc. They went to, and graduated from college. Most people childfree come from 1st world countries, and can take care of themselves without help of the government...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 12:02 AM
8

People into being chased/doing the chase would probably do good if they had the safewords tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:58 PM
1

I'm pretty sure if I ever got back into dating, I would date bisexual men. All humans are capable of catching std, cheating, being promiscuous, etc. So, yeah. I'm not gonna hold it against one, especially my own, group. Also, this brought out the phobia (notably against gay and bi men) in some comments lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:17 AM
5

Men have a higher chance of committing everything. Therefore, all men (going by your logic) are xyz.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:12 AM
2

None. I don't think with my genitals lol, so someone not having sex isn't a red flag (ex if they're asexual). Nor am I'm going to shame virgins. If he wants advice, all I say is to be honest. If she dislikes that? You dodged a bullet, so move on. Find a girl who will be accepting of you. Especially if she's in the same boat (virgin).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 05:17 AM
–

If the country calls for drafting, I'll be among my family to be hiding my male relatives lol. Hiding, sending away, or making them (voluntarily) disabled.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:42 AM
–

I get what you're writing about anti drafting. No one should be forced into it, regardless of gender. Especially if it's a rich, old man's war... What I don't get is how df is your wife supposed to remain "faithful" to you when you're dead. Do you exactly her to remain single forever? Also, you don't just magically get new loved ones that can replace the old ones. If your wife is an actual, decent person, she would be supportive for you when you came back from the war. Alongside, there are some …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:39 AM
–

Being a draft dodger when your country is attacked is the best way to insure a long celibate life. Not if the woman is anti-drafting. Especially if she has male kids of her own, and has to worry about if her son gets drafted to fight some old, rich man's war.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:34 AM
–

Majority of Americans are middle class. Depending on what this war is about, they shouldn't be forced to fight for some old, rich white man's war.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:30 AM
–

And which country you are from? Because, Ukraine isn't mine and I will care for citizens of my own before any other. Especially after those certain little racial incidents. Rather my taxes go to things actually worth it (for my country).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:28 AM
1

Me. I don't kids. Even when I was younger, and got up to 18, still didn't want kids. I like freedom, and not being held down. I wish I could sterilize, but it's iffy and the side effects it has.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:45 AM
1

15 and above. 14, 13, and below are just meh. Unless they're actively dangerous cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:29 AM
1

look at James Bulgar’s murder, he was killed and SA’d by two 10 year old boys I thought the sa was debunked? They killed him, but there was no evidence for sa part?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:26 AM
1

Lol, wouldn't work, bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:05 AM
1

Unless they're living in a pro-life state, no one forced them to have children they cannot care for. There's abortion, adoption, surgery, etc. It is their responsibility to care for their children. Not other people who are taxpayers. This including taxpayers who have their own kids to care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:55 AM
1

Children can be mistakes. Protection doesn't always work. It's not horrible to be honest about it. Some kids CAN be mistakes. Why are we punishing taxpayers for their parents' choice in keeping them? It's not taxpayers' fault either.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 05:11 PM
1

Surrogacy comes with issues. From if using a woman to carry a child is a moral thing to do (especially her circumstances, ex she's poor). To if she becomes attached. While true, but it is a solution to those who want the kid but not the partner. Like women who are single moms by choice. It would be so much easier for them, and it wouldn't be hard on their bodies. Either way, my comment was just for the antinatalist part of your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 05:06 PM
0

Alimony should be removed, or at least reformed. Child support should be kept. Only because it took two to create this bundle of cells.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 03:27 AM
3

Until the government starts building artifical wombs. Which would be perfect. For LGBT, sterile/infertile couples, women who want kids but not the physical issues of it, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 03:25 AM
3

The parents are the ones taking care of these kids. Of course, the money will be going to them. I want government assistance programs for children directly. Social welfare that doesn't educate children to be productive is useless And who's going to pay for this? It's not taxpayers' fault (where this money will be coming from), but the parents' choice/fault for having kids they can't afford. It's not other people's responsibility to care for kids that aren't theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 03:18 AM
1

There's a big difference between genuinely terrible things, and adults deciding what to do with their bodies. Alongside, if they choose to get paid for it or not lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 03:12 AM
0

Opinion, not fact. Sex work has been around for centuries. It'll still continue until the end of time. It's better to legalize, make it safe for workers, and not stigmatize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 03:05 AM
3

No. But, because the majority of women are heterosexual. Alongside this, most heavy work is done by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 02:54 AM
0

Ukrainian men were forced to stay. Some also choose to stay, but the government stopped others from leaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 02:50 AM
-1

True, at least for now. Not necessarily. LGBT parents already have proven that. Children need two parents (if possible). Second opinions can some different people. Some studies show straight and bisexual women are happier being single (and childfree). Typically, men make more money. Of course, it would be seen as them being "better" in this area. Until women make more money, and become the heads of household. Usually when they're the breadwinner and/or single parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 02:49 AM
1

Not your body, not your choice. If people want to sell their bodies, they will. It's better to make it legal and safe. Sex work has always existed. Humans are sexual beings. Trying to control what they do with their bodies is yikes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 06:20 AM
1

Still consenusal between adults. "Renting" or not is their business. Why give it up for free, when you can get paid for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 06:16 AM
1

Some still choose to use it tho, and not just the older generations. I still see younger/similar age lesbians use the terms (especially femmes. There's also studs for black lesbians, I definitely see). I still use tomcat lol. But, that isn't a lesbian term. The entire LGBT still use their own specific labels. Old and young.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 03:42 AM
3

Yeah... I was gonna write. Some lesbians are femmes who date femmes, and vice versa of butches with butches.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 01:01 AM
–

True, I suppose. Regardless, both are adults. As long as it's consenusal, and they know what they're getting into, I don't really care. It's not my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:03 AM
1

still financially and emotionally dependent on their parents, and has basically zero real-world experiences The problem with that is there's still adults who are like that tho. Either dependant on their parent(s), and/or have "no real world experience" (which varies by cultures, as not everyone has the same experience nor wants to). Should they not date older? Plus, other factors, such as neurodiversity. What if the younger person has more "life experience" than the older person? (Ex being a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 02:31 PM
1

Most would I have seen complain about what adults do with each other are younger and/or similar ages to me (20+). Now, are there some older, "unattractive," and/or unable to partake who complain? Yeah. But, I've seen more younger/20s age complain about it. Even when it's fictional. So, no. It's not just the people who you described complaining. While I don't see it as grooming (child safeguarding term), it could be creepy in some cases. But, I couldn't care less. I got better things to worry abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 02:25 PM
1

Yeah, no... Not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:48 PM
1

Society wise, not normal. Personally, I couldn't care. I'm abnormal myself, so I won't judge them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:39 PM
–

Then, they could use another term. Grooming is specifically for children safeguarding.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:33 PM
0

Man #2 imo. He has the money, personality, and looks. Logically, he should be most ideal. But, from some women I've seen (online strangers), they would choose #1. Women I know? When they were younger, #2 man would be best. They've been working all their lives, they're not privileged women, so they deserve a man like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:10 PM
0

Not everyone looks "worse" as they age (this, in partial, is what causes people to go through such high lengths to be youthful).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:58 PM
1

Ah, got it. But, it's not really up to them. It's up to people who were actually groomed, and see others using it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 07:59 PM
1

We already have people dating effiel tower, cars, life size dolls, etc. Not necessarily. If they know the difference between a living person, and a robot.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 07:57 PM
1

Hasn't dated anyone. Especially if she's the type who was who lacks social skills or something (ex neurodiverse).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 07:56 PM
1

It kind of does imo. One is a teenger (a minor, still in high school). The other is an adult in their 20s. Already into college for a good 2+ years now.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 07:54 PM
1

Maybe 🤷🏽‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 07:52 PM
1

If the brain still developing, should she (or any other below 25) not be allowed to vote? I'm pretty sure my 18 up to 21 year old version would found that insulting AF. I could: vote, get into SW, go to war/military, etc... But, I'm still too much of a "child" to pick my own partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:01 AM
3

Young adults (18-25) can't stand up for themselves? Plus, not everyone experience the same thing. What life experience is for one person, can be different for another. Especially if the person has been sheltered.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:55 AM
2

I don't know what they wrote (deleted), but it's odd. Old enough to go to war, get into SW, vote, etc. But can't pick their own dating partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:52 AM
1

And what if she hasn't dated men?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:49 AM
1

Well, 16 year olds are minors. They don't know any better. 21 year olds? That's a different story. One is more actually predatory than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:47 AM
1

I think people will no longer feel anyone is being sexually exploited or groomed in light of a 20 year age gap. Adults can't be groomed tho. It's odd how more rampant some people are with using child safeguarding terms for adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:44 AM
1

As long as both are legally adults in a consensual relationship. Not my life, why should I care? I have other things to worry about than who people date and/or love.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:40 AM
2

Why exactly do these opinions need to be seen? They're not hurting anyone. We can just leave them be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:35 AM
1

Despite some of the expectations listed, it would be interesting. I'm not gonna lie. I give it a go.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:13 PM
1

I have not. But girl, that sounds nice AF.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:09 PM
1

I might get crap for this, but even as a survivor, I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Especially as someone who comes from a race who's men were falsely accused and lynched b/c of white women in the past. Now, if someone told me privately? I would give benefit of the doubt. Publicly? Innocent until proven guilty.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:30 PM
1

Their life, their choice. I don't care what adults do with their artifical boy/girlfriends. If it makes them happy? Cool. I don't think we should prevent it either. Realistically, it's going to be expensive AF. Only a small minority of men would buy it. But, even if not? Idc. I don't think they should be shamed for it either. they have synthetic partners in their past we refuse to date them. As a deterrent. I wouldn't actively refuse it. I probably be curious, and ask questions. If I reject, it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:14 PM
3

Maybe he was gay? But then again, I can't see why a gay guy would act like that either.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 07:50 PM
–

all of these except voting shouldn't be permitted until you're way older either. All or none. Either they're an adult or child. If they're adults, they should get all rights of one. Everything should be raised up to 21 tbh (including voting. It could be 25, but the "25 brain" doesn't work since people develop at different paces).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 09:11 PM
–

there are many of us If they're of legal age, I don't care. I have actual issues to worry about. Not what adults do with each other (especially when said adults can get into SW, and war).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 09:05 PM
–

Wrong. Most who complain about it are younger people (worried about other people's lives).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:59 PM
–

It's all legal adult ages. There are more serious issues to be dealing with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:58 PM
–

Majority of people I've seen bitching about (legal) age gaps were younger people. Not older women. Now, that's not to say there isn't older women who complain about it, but I've seen more younger (or similar age to me) people complain about it. Even 17 and 18 year old dating is a "problem."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:46 PM
6

I got to take a break from this subredit sometimes. Some posts give me brainrot.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:27 AM
-2

Most women are happier being single. You have some who are genuinely happier, and others who claim it as a personality trait. Also, it's not like women magically have a bunch of men lining up to have sex. It isn't easier for women. If someone brings up the "women today are unhappy, compared to past" notion... Everyone is depressed. Getting help for mental health is crap (at least in the US), and it's more known because of less stigmatization and/or risk of being tossed into a hospital.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:26 AM
–

I'm 25. If I ever magically decided to ever get into dating, it depends. If we have some chemistry? Sure, why not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:45 AM
–

The brain continues developing even after that. Sometimes, well into the 30s (varies by person).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:43 AM
2

Some guys keep pushing and misreading it as playing hard to get so they get annoying. I've also seen some (very little) women into this too. Where she wants the guy to "chase" her with consent. I think in scenarios like this, there should be some (depending where it is, ex bdsm club) safeword or signal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:20 PM
2

We have overpopulation in some developing countries, but I'm sure those countries "aren't ideal". It has to be certain groups that "need" to be having kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:03 PM
3

Humans aren't going extinct. There's overpopulation in some developing countries. It isn't "more" dangerous than AIDS, nor should it be treated some. It's insensitive. Men or women shouldn't be forced to have children. That is not a healthy society to be existing, where they have people forcibly have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:01 PM
1

Who's more empathetic? Sympathetic? Who has a good heart? I need more information on their personality. Because, one could be cruel, and two the biggest heart ever. Just like vice versa, and I'm not trying to attach negative terms to someone just because they're unattractive (lookism). So, neither. Edit: had to fix some misspellings.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 01:56 PM
1

Asexuality is a real thing btw. It's a spectrum too. Some will want to do, while others don't. Just like aromantic is a thing too. It isn't an issue, brain damage, or any of the sort. My comment was made becusse you're saying there's something wrong with single people at 40. When there could be nothing wrong with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 01:45 PM
1

Wtf? Don't accuse someone with serious accusations like that. You water down the seriousness of the term.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 01:35 PM
1

They clearly don't have issues, unless they actually do. Not everyone wants to be dating/married. What if they're asexual?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 01:31 PM
4

There's other inventions that are/were far worse than the internet. So, no. It isn't the worst invention. While the internet may have its cons, there's also its pros. No one, but these specific men, choose to sit and watch porn and complain about women. That is not the internet's fault. If they are doing it now, with the internet, they would've been doing similar before it. The major con of the internet has to do with kids. It has become easier for creeps to talk to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 01:22 PM
1

Physically scared? I would say no, but wary. If we're just in a room then, that would be fine. I forced myself to "get over" it. I used to get very anxious about being alone with a stranger. For places like, elevator, car, subway, etc? More than one person. For public restrooms, more people and/or family attending with me, and they would HAVE to wait till I was finished. It caused an annoyance for family (which is why I had to "get over" it). As for friends? I try to keep both family and friends…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 06:12 PM
–

No, both genders' standards are high. Let's not pretend all women are like this, and men are just sweet, unbiased angels who would take any woman as a partner. Yes, heightism is a thing. But, would most men marry a tall woman? (Without someone cracking a joke that "She's a man". Which is a thing that does happen). As for the wealth aspect, you're selecting a minor group women off a interview. They don't represent all women. Just like a pos guy doesn't represent all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 03:32 PM
2

One of my groomers was a woman. She was like 27, and I was like 12. So, physically, and mentally, I'm just as very wary of women and men. She was my 1st experience in WLW "relationships".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 05:01 PM
2

Unfortunately, I can't say the same. .-.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 04:04 PM
–

Yep, I agree with you. 25 isn't a magical "turn fully adult" switch. Similar to turning 18 doesnt mean magically become an full grown adult. If anything, it means when the brain starts degrading. Honestly, if an 18+ dates someone older? IDC. They're an adult. As long as it was consensual, then that's all that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 02:43 PM
6

I feel like women victimized by other women are also downplayed (obviously men victimized is more because of sexism). So, there could be some solidarity there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 01:33 AM
1

Yes, there are those threats. But, whether it is or isn't a penis, there'll still be trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 06:08 PM
1

Sorry, could you give me an example? I'm assuming you mean like, someone's drunk and their "friends" force them to get a tattoo (just example)? Similar things like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 06:04 PM
1

Woman B, and Man A. The other two would probably damage my brain more lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 04:39 PM
4

Drunk people CAN'T consent. Their thinking is impaired. That's why it's rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 02:07 AM
2

Yes. Because it's still forcing something into someone without consent. In cis women's case, if she isn't lubricated (and even if she was, still rape), that could cause trauma to the vagina. Especially if extremely violent. With cis men, well... The anus is "technically" self explanatory. There's already a need for proper preparation. Rape doesn't care for any of that. And even if all the things I stated was involved- it would still be rape. Edit: misspelling words
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 02:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter