TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MonkeyType Archive

View 1 posts and 36 comments by MonkeyType on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Yeah I didn’t know what I wanted to do with my life until I understood the scope of the Feminism problem in schools. Which is unfortunate.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 06:02 PM
3

rip
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:32 PM
3

A moment of silence for those who wasted 10 minutes...
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:31 PM
2

Yeah it’s an interview not an open letter: Which is dumb. Where’s the tweet or something OP?
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:18 PM
3

This is how you take the right steps to defend men’s liberty with the sufficient humility to keep things to a simple matter of voice. People are losing sight of this: That OP’s dialogue is a strong dialogue to serve a purpose greater than any one man, and, through reciprocation, that it’s stronger as anything else because of its truth in men’s liberty. Thus it is true that it’s harder as anything else to live in the world with these (OP’s) beliefs; There is no “bigger fish” in a world of hardshi…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 05:03 PM
1

Fear it more because it’s long-term effect is dense introspection - and by dense introspection I mean like swandiving from the top ropes into a black hole. Genuinely questioning yourself as being a good person is more or less the rock bottom. Very meta on male privilege. Very enlightening but yeah looks like death.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 09:15 AM
2

Long comment because you deserve some empathy here. Hang in there human being. So you’re living in an edgelord’s wet dream in this case; Vengeance is intertwined with your civil rights infringements. Weird lottery to win but low-key you’re on “I challenge you to a dual, bitch” level untouchable in school court. For yourself and your family, clear up the morally ambiguous bullshit by huddling around the laptop and looking into the legal crap. Prosecution vs. Suing, Demanding retrial when judge er…
/r/MensRights30/01/21 08:57 AM
1

Been there, done that Did they ask you if you did it? And by that I mean this goes from 0 to 100 in badass ways depending if they did or not.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 04:32 AM
3

Yes please that redditor is legend and so is the whole thread probably. Though assholes will witchhunt so idk not worth
/r/MensRights28/01/21 05:52 AM
6

Nice. “oh tru” response and get away imho - That stuff can domino and I don’t need that, I’d rather just keep it to myself/lie. Shitty thing but I try to find other ways to support men to help make up for it. And I’ll always respect the one’s that fight for truth. Probably more than I respect myself; So they’ll be role models - and maybe when I’m older I’ll be an activist too.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 05:09 PM
3

Well this is impressive. Can I steal this for an essay?
/r/MensRights26/01/21 01:12 PM
7

Doesn’t that also mean being anti-men is homophobic? Asking because the title to me sounds similar to a title of Being very bad is evil
/r/MensRights26/01/21 12:50 PM
3

Learn the everliving shit out of Libel Law if you’re a dude in or about to be in college. Reduces your chances of bailing school by 50%. IIED might be a good starting point. edit: Alexander Hamilton’s contributions to libel law is another good starting point.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 10:14 AM
0

What the fuck is “I speak specifically of this single instance” even supposed to mean? How the hell is anyone supposed to know what this is referring to? Do you have any idea how illegible all your points are? At least I can make enough sense that people can deem I’m wrong. The whole damn thread. You absolutely suck at writing and I’m done here.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 07:12 AM
0

I’ve restated my “point” three times: No shit I want to talk about my point. If it’s an improper point so be it, but it’s still my point. What the fuck logic is it that because you think the point is improper, there must be a hidden “real” point I have. Seriously what the fuck is that. Because it sounds like a paranoia disorder.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 06:56 AM
1

You do realize the point of ad hominen is that it’s a shorter and simpler way of saying “an argument against the person,” right? If you think it’s pretentious to abbreviate a concept to make it more universally accessible and understandable to and for people......... yeah no comment
/r/MensRights26/01/21 03:16 AM
1

I mean you probably should if you’re more offended - And I don’t think it takes a lot of emotional intelligence to understand who’s exhibiting more signs of feeling offended. If I was harassing someone without realizing it I’d appreciate someone giving me that heads up, and I like to lead by example. So put two and two together. Offending people is a lot harder than you think it is. This is the age where everyone feels like they are masters of the art of lying, offending, judging and trolling. I…
/r/MensRights26/01/21 02:30 AM
1

Hey someone who actually understands what a healthy debate looks like “That” is the use of an ad hominen argument. It’s not fallacious or necessarily weaker than the other argument paths. Again only because it’s a legal case. I’ll get back to this in a bit.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 10:48 PM
-1

You’re treating it like a mild thing, like an opinion That judgment and comparison is an opinion of opinions. I don’t know what you’re talking about with the hate thing but it sounds rough lol
/r/MensRights25/01/21 10:20 PM
3

Violates the Fair Housing Act probably.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 10:02 PM
-1

Conflated and pontificationwtf? are 100% the only big words in this subthread. If you think fallacious is a big word you’re just wrong - you learn that word like four times over in high school. You do not know how to use conflated in a sentence. edit: Pontiff Sulyvahn
/r/MensRights25/01/21 09:47 PM
1

That’s how I interpreted the question. In this case calling the woman management dumb is ad hominen. My point is there’s nothing really wrong with that in a legal case. “Sexist bc dumb af” is valid here and it’s probably why a majority of the comments said it. I don’t think a lot of people here realize there’s a difference between law and general debate. One’s centered on practice, the other on theory. And if law distinctions aren’t important then why the fuck is law in the very first sentence o…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 09:32 PM
-5

My point was the moreover paragraph. Everything before it were the legs. My point, this time in more detail and emphasis, was this: Since liberty is law, concluding there’s unlawful sexism towards men because the woman is sexist is at least equally strong as concluding the woman is sexist because they engaged in unlawful sexism towards men. This is so because the defendant has the right to confront and question witnesses in the US judicial system. This weakens the ad hominen argument significant…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 09:14 PM
0

Worth noting this is the first response where you accurately understood my points beforehand, morbidity aside. Unrelated but would you mind if I ask what your political philosophy is? Your opinion on opinions is interesting.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 04:58 PM
-1

Edited in a few additional points earlier in the thread btw.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 04:42 PM
0

Yeah I dunno man even when I leave a comment with a single sentence you still totally miss my point. Forget right or wrong, this is just uninformative now. I’ll reread this thread later but yeah I’m out. Harassment btw
/r/MensRights25/01/21 04:04 PM
-2

If you already know the answers to your questions why ask them?
/r/MensRights25/01/21 03:55 PM
-5

Point taken. Do you consider this a real debate? And if not what is this.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 03:39 PM
-5

I said defend men’s liberty that’s very different. Even if you don’t agree with that please at least accurately quote me. Now assuming you account for that but still have the same conclusion, here’s my response: Would it not be more accurate to instead say they CAN be detrimental to defending men’s liberty? If not that’d mean there would be no exceptions to the rule. Edit: Forgot to mention: In my corner we are clearly on the same page on what is right and wrong here as it pertains to men’s libe…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 03:27 PM
-5

This is a good question. I think I disagree with your conclusive point though. Liberty is a legal concern because it is a political truth. As such breaches of liberty can ultimately be boiled down to a prosecutor and a defendant. The defendant can defend his preconceived views of personal liberty infringement (like you were saying) and that’s great, but a defendant scrutinizing the prosecutor’s rationale to reveal discriminatory intent is just as valid. In most situations, ad hominem arguments a…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 03:15 PM
5

POOL’S CLOSED there’s something in the water!
/r/MensRights25/01/21 01:13 PM
6

Great first women can’t swim because of sexist bikinis and now men can’t either because they caused “incidents” at same said pool: the pets win the pool. “Incidents” pfft please, If you’re gonna prosecute the whole you better damn well know you have to specify what incidents are supposed to mean. Morons. Was it stalking or groping or beating children or kidnapping; or were they jizzin in the damn pool. How about we don’t make things more confusing for no reason. Like I was a sexist male before a…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 05:52 AM
5

I always took it as some women find authenticity attractive. Similar to confidence. If you’re authentic, you’re ambivalent to being a jerk or a nice guy. All that matters is truth of self minus agreeableness obligations or other context. A “nice guy” is a faker. A jerk has bigger problems. Idk maybe you don’t have to feel bad.
/r/seduction09/01/21 08:44 AM
3

Don’t talk too fast.
/r/seduction07/01/21 10:17 AM
2

Lmao shouting? That’s a thing?
/r/seduction07/01/21 10:15 AM
1

Wingman, house party and balls. You don’t just walk up to them lol. This is your game not homecoming. Sometimes you get lucky in a class - that’s the closest thing to them coming to you it’ll get. Edit: words
/r/seduction07/01/21 10:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter