~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Romeo of Rimini, aged 63, dies while having sex with a 23 y.o. Romanian touristSex is not just "physical exercise". Every time you do it the woman takes some of your JuJu, your soul, like a spiritual vampire. Not to mention the nutrient loss every time you shoot. That is why feminism exists; we have fucked them too much and now they own the soul of masculinity;) | /r/TheRedPill | 07/10/18 10:50 PM |
| 1 | Romeo of Rimini, aged 63, dies while having sex with a 23 y.o. Romanian touristI think you missed a couple of comments. At least 2 people got it, and the fact that most didn’t get it is also funny. | /r/TheRedPill | 07/10/18 10:29 PM |
| 1 | Romeo of Rimini, aged 63, dies while having sex with a 23 y.o. Romanian touristThis was meant as satire, as comic relief. Something to laugh about and play along with.... why so serious all the time? | /r/TheRedPill | 07/10/18 10:11 PM |
| 13 | Romeo of Rimini, aged 63, dies while having sex with a 23 y.o. Romanian touristLooks like youre the only one here so far who has picked up on the satire... | /r/TheRedPill | 07/10/18 10:36 AM |
| 5 | Romeo of Rimini, aged 63, dies while having sex with a 23 y.o. Romanian touristCalm down..:) this was supposed to be funny, not a serious claim that 6000 is some magic number. His whole life was funny, the name of the club, the look, it’s an Italian soap opera. | /r/TheRedPill | 07/10/18 10:32 AM |
| 2 | Why Feminists Enjoy Rape FantasiesCritelli, J. & Bivona, J. Women’s Erotic Rape Fantasies: An Evaluation of Theory and Research. The Journal of Sex Research, 2008. Found that only 9% of rape fantasies were purely aversive, while 91% were at least in part enjoyable/satisfying. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/07/18 01:00 AM |
| 3 | Why Feminists Enjoy Rape FantasiesInteresting. Therapeutic role-play does make sense to me. Not sure if you’re talking about fantasy (internal imagination or dream) or just pretending or role-play though. It seems most cases of this kind of fantasy are not about role play but just imagination, and imagination of a situation where you have no control. The lack of control, the giving up, is often identified as the arousing element. That is why the ‘sympathetic activation’ theory is one of the most popular explanatory theses among … | /r/TheRedPill | 03/07/18 10:24 PM |
| 10 | Why Feminists Enjoy Rape FantasiesAcademic literature (psychology) consistently refers to this as 'rape fantasy'. | /r/TheRedPill | 01/07/18 12:53 AM |
| 40 | Why Feminists Enjoy Rape FantasiesI think this is the primary psychological motivation: I’m a feminist Because I want to give you a reason to show me that you’re the man. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/06/18 11:41 AM |
| 9 | Why Feminists Enjoy Rape FantasiesThe article is not about playing out the fantasy in real life but enjoying the fantasy just as fantasy, mostly not with ones own partner but some imaginary, fictional figure. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/06/18 10:19 AM |
| 3 | Why Feminists Enjoy Rape FantasiesSUMMARY Eroticised (sexually satisfying) rape by a male is the most common sexual fantasy for women (Janda 1985). Shulman & Horne (2006) show that sexually empowered and erotophilic females, a category also associated with the strongest feminist beliefs, are the most likely to experience eroticised rape fantasies or dreams. I evaluate the hypothesis that escalation of the feminist rhetoric is an unconscious compensatory response of the female psyche to the conflict between the Enlightenment idea… | /r/MensRights | 28/06/18 11:15 PM |
| 1 | Woman armed with machete forced ex-boyfriend to have sex, police sayPeople laugh and say, “why didn’t you fight back”, “why didn’t you use your mobile phone or car keys to defend yourself”? Ill tell you how this works. A typical psycho would say, “if you try defending yourself i will cut Myself with that machete and blame it on you. Oh yes, they wil believe me. Prominent Feminists will write articles in my defence and i will sob in the Court, i will tremble and say how afraid i am to even go outside, and You mister, You will ROT IN JAIL. Got it? Now take your pa… | /r/MensRights | 28/06/18 12:08 AM |
| 1 | Darwinian (‘traditional’) sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Evidence clearly refutes the ‘gender-neutral’ model.The idea that we are all infinitely malleable and can change gender roles, desires and predispositions is used to justify legislation to re-educate men and boys about what they are and how they should be. Studies like this show that certain gender roles, preferences and sensitivities are biologically controlled and are sex-specific, so that any attempt to change them is akin to gay-conversion therapy, forcing ideology onto nature. That is why this is important, perhaps nowadays more important th… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/18 10:31 PM |
| 8 | Darwinian (‘traditional’) sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Evidence clearly refutes the ‘gender-neutral’ model.The value of this paper is that it provides statistical proof that traditional sex roles, such as child rearing by females and dominance by males, is linked to biology across the animal world, and therefore not a human social construct. This is something more than just biological differences you refer to, but extends to biologically conditioned behaviour patters. Here’s another paper which is very important in this regard: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161031165139.htm | /r/MensRights | 27/06/18 03:50 AM |
| 27 | Darwinian (‘traditional’) sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Evidence clearly refutes the ‘gender-neutral’ model.Summary: The Darwin-Bateman paradigm predicts that anisogamy imposes stronger sexual selection on males, which, in turn, drives the evolution of conventional sex roles in terms of female-biased parental care and male-biased sexual dimorphism. Although this paradigm forms the cornerstone of modern sexual selection theory, it still remains untested across the animal tree of life. This lack of evidence has promoted the rise of alternative hypotheses arguing that sex differences are entirely driven … | /r/MensRights | 27/06/18 03:25 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (UPDATED: Includes Verified DV Homicide Incident List for 2017)Interesting. I did an article recently expensing one such definitional manipulation: https://culturalanalysis.net/2018/06/03/dividing-the-sexes-the-coroners-court-and-the-feminist-agenda/ | /r/MensRights | 24/06/18 02:44 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (UPDATED: Includes Verified DV Homicide Incident List for 2017)Your argument is not making sense. It doesn’t matter why these cases were reported or who reported them. Fact, they were reported and the reports are unlikely to be faked by the media, therefore representative of real cases. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 10:47 PM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (UPDATED: Includes Verified DV Homicide Incident List for 2017)I don’t know how they classify this kind of cases for public consumption. I know that at least one woman got off with 6 months house arrest recently, for murdering an infant, if I remember correctly. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 10:43 PM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (UPDATED: Includes Verified DV Homicide Incident List for 2017)discrimination is a way of dividing. It establishes hierarchy. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 02:45 PM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (UPDATED: Includes Verified DV Homicide Incident List for 2017)So your objection is that people who have not committed homicide are not reported about in the news that they have committed homicide? And that the media find homicide stories to be high-value news items so they report it? That’s precisely what makes it statistically representative. How you want to interpret those facts, or if you want to dismiss them for some reason, thats up to you. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 08:36 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (UPDATED: Includes Verified DV Homicide Incident List for 2017)I’m still not clear what is your concern. Is it that the media reports are false and the government statistics are true? I dont know, but there’s a discrepancy, so somebody is lying. My bet on this one is that the government is lying. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 07:33 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (UPDATED: Includes Verified DV Homicide Incident List for 2017)I dont understand. I have only listed the media reports about female perpetrators, not male perpetrators. Male perpetrated homicides are not contested in the article. The article is aiming to present evidence that the dominant narrative of DV homicide being a predominantly male crime against women and children is false, because there were 31 cases of DV homicide committed by females in 2017. both DV and non-DV homicides in 2017 accounted for 170 deaths (with further 40 deaths still under investi… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 06:26 AM |
| 2 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (UPDATED: Includes Verified DV Homicide Incident List for 2017)Following the DV Homicide Statistics 2018 I have presented here last week several Redditors have kindly pointed out errors in the data (a number of cases reported were actually from 2017 and from previous years). I have since deleted the article and focussed on reviewing the data-set. In his article i have carefully verified all media-reported cases of (alleged) DV Homicide committed by female perpetrators in 2017. Please alert me if any inconsistencies/errors are still present. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 04:31 AM |
| 2 | Semantogymnastics about MicroconsentDon't know. I found many good articles in the past got immediately downvoted, not just here. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 12:46 AM |
| 2 | Semantogymnastics about MicroconsentThe title is a parody of postmodernist, feminist ideology... | /r/MensRights | 23/06/18 12:04 AM |
| 2 | Domestic Violence Homicide Statistics 2018 (Australia)Thanks for doing that work. Yes, this Source is too sloppy. I’ll remove this article. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/18 01:34 PM |
| 2 | Domestic Violence Homicide Statistics 2018 (Australia)I agree that 2 of these cases should not count as DV. In the third case, that of the infertile woman, the perpetrators and the victim occupied the same property, so DV status probably applies. There is another case of a women shooting a lawyer execution style which I have also flagged as of disputed DV status. I don’t see any other suspicious cases but if you can see any please let me know. Bottom line, even if all of these cases are excluded the numbers still contradict the official narrative, … | /r/MensRights | 20/06/18 02:25 PM |
| 4 | Domestic Violence Homicide Statistics 2018 (Australia)There was a mass shooting in WA, with 7 dead, of which 6 were victims of murder-suicide by a Male. This was not properly counted in the chart as it brings the number of victims for that month to 11 (not 9 as shown). | /r/MensRights | 19/06/18 11:32 PM |
| 2 | Domestic Violence Homicide Statistics 2018 (Australia)I agree, it would be more informative to consider the reported charging and the reported sentencing/convictions as seperate categories. Based on the data presented by DVAA, it is possible to distill the charges only and compare numbers. On a cursory look this would bring the rate of alleged perpetration to roughly the same for males as for females. Looking just at items identified as Charged the list of victims of male perpetrated Homicide would shrink by 11 bodies. On my count females were char… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/18 10:56 PM |
| 1 | Latest Statistic in Domestic Violence Homicide (Australia)2018 So far: Females have killed 23 males Males have killed 12 females Females have killed 7 females Males have killed 7 males Females have killed 15 children Males have killed 5 children “But males are the violent ones... Males are the reason why females are scared Males are the most evil things imaginable” | /r/MensRights | 19/06/18 11:21 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: The Coroner’s Court and the Feminist Agenda“No, it’s murder, statistically.” There’s no way you can spin this, statistically. It’s both. Murdering your intimate partner is a case of Domestic Violence And Murder. Murder is necessarily violence, violence is not necessarily murder. | /r/TheRedPill | 03/06/18 09:55 PM |
| 0 | Dividing the Sexes: The Coroner’s Court and the Feminist AgendaIs not murder of a partner or child already domestic violence? Irrespective, the results are being sold in the media as comprehensive, all there is to know about domestic violence including murder. Nobody declares that there is this separate category called domestic murder without domestic violence where gender distribution might be different. | /r/TheRedPill | 03/06/18 02:04 PM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: The Coroner’s Court and the Feminist AgendaOn the first point, domestic homicide rates (without the definitional limitation as in the Coroner’s report) are estimated based on media reports in the last link of the article. As for the second point, fair enough. Call me a conspiracy theorist but i still disagree. | /r/TheRedPill | 03/06/18 01:18 PM |
| 17 | The High Costs of FatherlessnessChild abuse and neglect overwhelmingly occur in households from which the biological father is absent or removed. Shamefully, recognising and defending fathers' role in the protection of their biological children is spurned by the prevailing left-feminist agenda. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/18 12:22 PM |
| 1 | Ground Breaking Research Refutes Feminist Lies: “Partner Violence as Female-specific in Aetiology”The study has found that in nonreciprocally violent relationships “women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases” as reported by both women (67.7%) and men (74.9%). | /r/MensRights | 23/05/18 01:21 PM |
| 3 | Ground Breaking Research Refutes Feminist Lies: “Partner Violence as Female-specific in Aetiology”Reasonable points, although you seem to be addressing only the abstract without contesting the cited evidence. I will dig deeper into to this. One objection that I may level at your criticism is that a study need not be empirical to be scientific. It is perfectly acceptable to conduct meta-analyses and theoretical modelling, although I agree that at some point it needs to be backed up by observational evidence. What he says does make sense, it is likely, but that does not make it a fact. I agree… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/18 03:31 AM |
| 3 | Ground Breaking Research Refutes Feminist Lies: “Partner Violence as Female-specific in Aetiology”Any specific examples and evidence of false claims? | /r/MensRights | 23/05/18 02:20 AM |
| 12 | Ground Breaking Research Refutes Feminist Lies: “Partner Violence as Female-specific in Aetiology”Summary: Male-specific self-inhibition of violence towards women, corresponding to an evolutionarily highly conserved male-specific dedicated neural pathway, and a female-specific actual preference in a couple context for physically violent expression of aggression, prompted by oxytocin (the very hormone underpinning pair-bonding): these findings together indicate that a new theory of partner violence [PV] is required, with a female-specific aetiology. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/18 01:47 PM |
| 0 | Weaponising Sexual ConsentJust because there are differences in preferences and behaviour between people does not justify having different standards of culpability for the Same behaviour. If consent is what matters then the requirement applies Equally to all comers, assuming equality. | /r/TheRedPill | 31/03/18 09:03 PM |
| 1 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenMy fave is Peerblock. Essential plugin but requires some active control. NoScript also very good, and yes to Ghostery | /r/TheRedPill | 29/03/18 09:49 AM |
| 1 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenMy fave is Peerblock. Essential plugin but requires some active control. NoScript also very good, and yes to Ghostery | /r/TheRedPill | 29/03/18 09:49 AM |
| 1 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenI think you’re right. This is psychological conditioning. | /r/TheRedPill | 29/03/18 04:09 AM |
| 2 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenThis is not part of my argument, just a hypothesis. I think it is psychologically plausible for some individuals, those who are already borderline rapists. As for rape statistics in Sweden I don’t know anything beyond the media reports, that Sweden has one of the highest rates of rape but also broad definition of rape. There were also reports of increase in violent rape and violent sexual assault by the recently arrived Muslim migrants. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 01:48 PM |
| 3 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenDifficult question. I’d say watch Iceland for precedents, as they have already passed something very similar. It’s a good idea to carry a recording device to you dates, but also assume that you are being recorded. It’s shit that all this stress and distrust is being put onto legit relationships, it is so divisive. So are there really no-go zones in Malmo and Stockholm ruled by sharia law? | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 09:58 AM |
| 7 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenIf you damned if you do and damned if you don’t... then some will opt for not getting consent at all. Since violent rape is already a huge problem in Sweden, creating more ambiguity and legal risk in legit sex gives more incentive to some borderline individuals to do it forcefully but anonymously. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 09:44 AM |
| 4 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenI have discussed this matter with the Swedish ministry of Justice and have tried to expose its absurdity to them, but at some point they stopped responding. I am not in Sweden so I rely only on media sources and pesosnal communications to assess the matter. I hope you’re right. Let’s wait a few weeks and it will decided. Good luck. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 07:39 AM |
| 11 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenYou are technically correct. It will come into force 1st of July, but the vote is now a mere formality after there is a clear parliamentary support for the changes. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sweden-sexcrimes/sweden-to-tighten-rape-legislation-outlawing-non-consensual-sex-idUSKBN1GW2C4 | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 07:08 AM |
| 81 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenYes, it's man hate. Funny, they still need men to enforce it. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 05:43 AM |
| 9 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenI was with women who loved to wake up that way. They would expect it. But even in this case this would be now too risky in Sweden. What if today she changed her mind.... or what if she didn’t but later said so after we separated, because she was feeling rejected and angry. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 05:17 AM |
| 26 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenConsider that this law can be used both ways. Men can use the same accusations and trigger the same presumption of guilt, assuming gender equality. But I am sure the justice system will forget “gender equality” when asked to prosecute women for the same ‘crimes’. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 04:10 AM |
| 13 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenThat is precisely the question I have asked the swedish ministry of justice, once we got talking. Never got a reply to that. In short, they know it’s vague and are ok with it. Gives them unlimited freedom to interpret... | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 04:07 AM |
| 15 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenFrom people who went there I hear they are cold, boring. But they do (did?) have a thing for dark skin, although that was before the recent migration wave from the Mid East and all that came with it. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/03/18 01:15 AM |
| 1 | Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia Confirms Anti-Men NarrativeI’ve seen plenty of evidence to the contrary. You don’t need Chad, just attitude you can back up. | /r/TheRedPill | 27/03/18 03:06 AM |
| 20 | Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia Confirms Anti-Men NarrativeWe are doing ourselves disfavour by not reporting such cases to the police. Women do and that distorts the stats and feeds the false narrative. A curious fact... in the Australian Buraeu of Statistics survey cited in the article they Define domestic violence as any act or Threat of violence. In the survey they ask if a person Felt threatened by a statement or suggestion (about a physical or sexual act) made to their face that then knew could be and were likely to be carried out. This proves that… | /r/TheRedPill | 26/03/18 07:39 AM |
| 15 | Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia Confirms Anti-Men Narrative20 years ago men were complaining that women were too prudish. Now we are getting more than we asked for. It does seem to be a social cycle though and I bet that the next generation will be prudish again, once they will see their parent aging like prunes and going crazy in their 40s from all the drugs. It is a generational disaster, partly (perhaps mostly) driven by the feminist narrative. The fact that governments embrace this narrative en masses suggests some sinister agenda. I dont want to ge… | /r/TheRedPill | 26/03/18 07:18 AM |
| 1 | Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia (Update, 1st Quarter 2018)There is no discrepancy, only different metrics. Royal Commission counts gender representation per case of violence; ABS survey counts persons affected anytime in their life. Some people offend multiple times. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/18 06:43 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in AustraliaAll the numbers above can be verified against the reports we are discussing. If you disagree you need to show how the specific numbers cited above are false or misconstrued. Anything else is just noise. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/18 05:44 AM |
| 0 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in AustraliaI have clarified the discrepancy in the data between the Royal Comission and the ABS survey, and guess what.... they are consistent. The former measures gender representation on per-incident basis; the latter on per-victim basis. Since the same victim is often associated with multiple incidents, the numbers are different. Specifically, 1 in 4 reported incidents has a male victim (royal commission) but the rate of reporting is 4 times lower for males than for females (ABS), therefore the number o… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/18 12:40 PM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia"Such justification hasn't and can't be made." ... | /r/MensRights | 20/03/18 01:15 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in AustraliaNo. I don't claim the stats are rock solid. But that's the best we have access to and that's the numbers the politicians rely on. The police records presented by the Royal commission are probably accurate. ABS is evidently not accurate but in absence of a better estimate of reporting rates this is the best we have. Media reports seem to confirm DVAA conclusions. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/18 12:11 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in AustraliaThat’s not what I meant. I meant that slapping or stalking or punching a wall, or grabbing someone’s arm in anger, is less serious than murder, at least in the eyes of the justice system and the penalties it imposes. But all of the above are lumped together in the domestic violence stats. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/18 09:47 AM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in AustraliaI meant the Royal commission (which is the most authoritative report on the issue) states here http://www.rcfv.com.au/MediaLibraries/RCFamilyViolence/Reports/RCFV_Full_Report_Interactive.pdf (page 57) That there is 3:1 ratio of male to female offenders (and inverse for victims of DV) according to police reports. The Abs data is an estimate based on a survey. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/18 01:59 AM |
| 2 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in AustraliaI'm not sure if that is what you meant but the 3:1 prevalence of female victims is a figure based on DV cases reported to the Police; further down the document they say that the reporting rate (to the police) is 4 times higher for women. In other words 4 time more men who are victims of DV don't report it, in comparison to the rate of female victims who do not report. The result is that the actual rate of DV is about even for men and women as victims. Politicians rely on the first figure but ign… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/18 11:29 PM |
| 1 | Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in AustraliaCorrect, it was just from media reports. The official government stats are radically different. I have noted that difference in the article which is nonetheless difficult to explain. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/18 09:42 PM |
| 0 | Why Homosexuality is Abnormal but Not Morally WrongYou are Pressupposing normality of homosexuality; I show that this presupposition is false. If you do not make a connection of this subject to MR than you have not been paying attention. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 01:48 PM |
| 6 | Homosexuality is Abnormal but Not Morally WrongSJW have monopolised the LGBT rights movement and are exploiting the premise of absolute normality, which is untrue for homosexuality and undermines the normative status of heterosexual malehood. This article is an attempt at unbiased, cool headed analysis of the competing claims about normality of sexual orientations. | /r/MGTOW | 20/02/18 01:07 PM |
| 1 | Why Homosexuality is Abnormal but Not Morally WrongAgreed. But the ’type’ who have monopolised the rights movement are exploiting precisely the premise of absolute normality, which is untrue for homosexuality and does undermine the normative status of heterosexual malehood. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 12:51 PM |
| 1 | Why Homosexuality is Abnormal but Not Morally WrongThe entire edifice of Feminism, LGBT and Trans-anything rights is essentially exercised at the expense of MR. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 12:45 PM |
| -1 | Why Homosexuality is Abnormal but Not Morally WrongAn important topic that most do not dare to post about..... for fear of harassment by SJWs. So here it is, a careful, dilligently researched and unbiased analysis of the homosexual claim to absolute normality. A rare treat. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 12:27 PM |
| 3 | Castration of Odin: On the New Sexual-Consent Law in SwedenThis woman’s body language, eye movement, intonation, all show thinly veiled psychosis, probably combined with psychopathy, with heavily practiced masking routine. | /r/MGTOW | 07/02/18 02:46 AM |
| 4 | Semantogymnastics about MicroconsentWouldnt help. She might have changed her mind a second later and ‘singnalled’ you about it, or even didn’t signal but you, in your excitement, failed to ask... but it works both ways: perhaps you didn’t ask and she didn’t ask and so you are both guilty of Mutual Rape. | /r/MGTOW | 06/02/18 11:53 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter