TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MonsterBlash Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by MonsterBlash on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

It's accurate information, delivered without fluff and to the point, so, yes, that's mansplaining, according to the latest definition, not the previous one.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 07:45 PM
2

Obviously, it means that only man have accurate information, and only man can only explain correctly then: "If you want to learn correctly, you need to have it mansplained to you, otherwise it's about as good as random noise."
/r/MensRights07/09/17 07:43 PM
18

minorities Oh no, not THAT minority, the other more minor minority!
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 04:28 PM
1

They denied the pass for not having a pussy? Seems it fits anyways. Anyways, still though it would get away with it because "muh (pretend) vegina", and it got denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 04:28 PM
18

After hearing that men had one safe place, Ms Jeanious decided to harass the barbers. (First comment on this sub, let's see if this gets me banned by some intolerant subs.)
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:40 PM
1

enoughtrumpspam + hillaryclinton 1 PoliticalDiscussion 0.809713066073817 2 enoughsandersspam 0.808718351570074 3 Enough_Sanders_Spam 0.76938960017999 4 EnoughLibertarianSpam 0.759747501585012 5 SandersForPresident 0.738451585859251 6 circlebroke 0.731687578842771 7 EnoughHillHate 0.730415301775438 8 SubredditDrama 0.719599437446053 9 **politics** **0.713584247130739** Soooooooo surprised. SyrianRebels (Al-Qaeda) + politics 6 news 0.747239334222302 ... 9 News_For_Women 0.742563135457864 10 Global…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 07:34 PM
2

I think the salty and snowflakes have as much chance of not being used as "sexist, homophobe, transphobic nazi fucking white male reeeeee". People are too retarded.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 07:21 PM
30

Yeah, because those people are the one running around calling everything sexist, racist, misogynistic, transphobe, fatphobe, shitlord reeee They're just diluting the terms, like retards.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 07:17 PM
1

Food comes from the fridge, duuuuuuuhhhhhhhh
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 07:15 PM
24

There are more women then men in school. Men are a minority. This is thus a hate crime. It doesn't have to be true, because of MSM we are past the age of reason, we just need to repeat it enough until the principal has no choice than to kick her out.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:49 PM
1

It used to be about people trying to get away with things because they have a vagina and getting denied. Surely if it's so bad, a new sub with only that objective would overtake this one in a jiffy. (Or maybe it's just drama from other subs spilling over.)
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:49 PM
2

Why aren't mod banning clear brigaders?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:38 PM
1

Sure, but they're wrong. The wage gap myth has been debunked for the last 20 years. Only edgy teens try to bring it up as if they discovered something new to rage about.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:36 PM
2

It's because it's not a wage (a fixed regular payment, typically paid on a daily or weekly basis, made by an employer to an employee.) gap, it's more of a "lifetime active assets" gap.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:32 PM
-5

No reputable economist Science is ok, but just if it says the right thing. That science, and those economics, obviously are wrong. So dismissing that science is not anti-science. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:30 PM
1

Except when they are not, because of current regulations. Personally, I want to see how well it would go without any IP laws. :-)
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:56 PM
3

Also: REASONABLY THOUGHT OUT EXPOSURE OF FEMINISM IS A GRAY AREA. VISIBILITY OF SAID POSTS WILL BE DETERMINED BY VOTES.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 05:37 PM
12

Because that way the sjw bots can't just name scrape the twitter handler to auto-harass him?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 05:36 PM
–

Isn't that what they are advocating with safe spaces anyway? But segregation by every criteria?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:07 PM
–

There is ZERO chance that man will not follow there genetic programming to protect women. -Bortasz Replied with : What happens when they are taken prisoner and tortured and raped [...] - Arakin Thinking only for women, and forgetting that the same happens to men.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:11 PM
–

You should decide you want to get shot at, first and foremost. Then, if you are male, you'll have better shot to getting your shot at getting shot.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:08 PM
5

So, in your opinion, if drinking and driving is an issue, then it's a good idea to attach to totally unrelated "while being Italian" to teach people to not drink and drive? I though that we were doing away with racism, sexism, classism, and other isms, in 2016. I guess people being ok with this means the pendulum really IS swinging back. No wonder Trump is still being talked about, and the media coverage didn't drop after the first week. Ok, with sexism, racism and the -ism, AmericasElegy's way …
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 08:00 PM
6

So, I guess you wouldn't mind a bunch of posters telling Muslim not to Jihad and murder people, or Blacks not to steal, or Mexican to not be lazy (and/or steal jobs), Italians to not drink and drive, Christians not to abort, fans of the WWE to not be violent drunkards rednecks, and women not to spermjack? I mean, you "know" I only mean some people of the group, right? And you're just getting easily offended and pedantic. ;-)
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 07:08 PM
5

they're not talking about the kind of rapists who drag people behind dumpsters or drug them at a bar. They're talking about guys who never learned that you shouldn't fuck a girl who's drunk, or get a girl drunk so that she'll fuck you, or grope someone who's passed out at a party. If those are the issue, then don't "teach men not to rape" teach people that having sex with someone who doesn't consent is rape. The problem is the way the message is worded. It's generalizing a whole gender, and says…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/16 06:39 PM
–

If they need your information, then it's not anonymous. If they need your information, it can and will be used against you. Just flat out refuse.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 06:03 PM
–

Wait, men and women brains work differently? Next you'll tell me that it isn't true, but, at the same time, that it's possible to tell that people are misgendered with brain scans! /s
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:45 PM
5

How often is online harassment investigated and arrested for? It happens extremely often. I guess the reports ARE actually publicly available, otherwise you wouldn't be able to assert this, and you'd be pulling this out of your ass. It's possible that the report aren't investigated, it's also possible that reports aren't made in the first place. All we do know is that some reports are investigated, because we know of people being arrested after such investigation. If you want to support that the…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:58 PM
16

Same in Canada, if someone makes online threats, the police arrest them. A threat has to actually happen though, someone disagreeing isn't illegal.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:17 PM
–

I figure that, with ALL the rape threat ALL the time, evidence would pile up REAL FUCKING FAST, and the police would close down on those making those threat in a minute. How the fuck do they receive so many threats, and there's never any report to the police about them?
/r/MensRights18/11/15 06:10 PM
18

If the modern army has lower requirements, and those requirements are easier to attain for women, that's fine, but men have to be tested with those requirements too, no need to over test in that case.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:48 PM
–

There's a difference between physical capacity, and physical requirements. You don't state the requirements from the capability, you select those with the capacity to fit the requirements.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:16 PM
20

You can also say " __ and apache/apache/apache, because they're not allowed to tell you you have to conform to anything ever.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 07:41 PM
0

is one of the more effective ways of getting some of the more rational feminists to realize that feminism might not be perfect In my experience, it's an efficient way at finding those for who it's not about logic, morals, ethics or equality.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 07:37 PM
–

Has there been an actual war in recent years? I though they always skimmed around the issue by claiming it wasn't actually a war? So, if it's just people in someone else's country, killing people, without their own government approbation, how can it be legal?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 08:36 PM
0

I'm not calling for the outlawing of abortions, but I'm starting to think we should be calling for the outlawing of unplanned pregnancies.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:28 PM
2

The issue is that can leave the child without sufficient support. No, the issue is that we, as a society, allow people to have child without being able to provide for them. Before, those people would just die out of starvation. Now, we support them and end up encouraging that behavior. Unsustainable pregnancy. The system to fix this is easy. Responsibilize ‎people before they have kids. If you can't prove you have the means to rise a child, then you aren't entitled to financial aid, in case of e…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:25 PM
1

No, people won't trade "a guy is forced to support a single mother who wants a kid" to "everyone has to support a single mother who wants a kid". If anything, the kid should "belong" to people who pay for it. So, if the mother can't pay, she puts him up for adoption. Kids are treated as a right, but in reality they're more of a luxury. If you can't support kids, you shouldn't have kids, or, YOU should have the burden of supporting kids. You know what public policy would make sense then? You need…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:19 PM
2

Not female fashion, female fashion modeling. If you see mannequin in store windows, and people wearing fashionable things, then it's not modeling, it's just the fashion. He's saying that, if female modeling vanished, big diff. The place where you might notice it more is the cover of magazine around registers. That's the amount of "impact" it would probably have on you. I mean, unless you are really really into fashion, and attend fashion shows and the like, of course.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:06 PM
3

Are you saying that there's an offer and demand at play, and, that people who have certain qualifications which are in demand, are going to be able to earn more?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:04 PM
2

Will they accept book by men who identify as female?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:24 PM
3

But, the drier is where I keep my clean clothes!
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:51 PM
1

Yo, I don't think we're talking about a world of law at this point.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:38 PM
2

Doesn't matter if all his offspring doen't have the best prospect. Take a guy who does what he does right now, and add in a couple rapes here and there, which give a couple of more kids here and there. Those kids, while not being at the best place in life, will probably make it, meaning more of his genes will have spread. He can also go for the long term plan simultaneously, which also give long term viability to his genes. Of course, murdering the competition would also probably be a good plan,…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 07:46 PM
–

No, you are wrong. Raping ALL WOMEN ALL THE TIME would give his gene the best chances.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 07:03 PM
–

If that's all it takes to justify something, I guess it's not so bad to remove all right from women, right? Because, as you're implying, we can't trust them, and they're just out to survive. Enslaving women "is just a survival strategy", lol! Thanks, you're really helping the issue. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights27/04/15 07:02 PM
2

And you film everything, to record her consent, to shield yourself from false rape accusation afterwards.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 04:24 PM
12

But who would let her? Too much risk. She could lie afterwards and say she was raped.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 04:23 PM
1

You could have gone straight to "she raped me, and then threw money at me, saying I was a whore, but she only threw half of what she'd pay a female whore". I mean, if we are just allowed to make false criminal accusations...
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 04:22 PM
11

and protected me in some way Why didn't she just say what she was willing to do and not do? I mean, that what adult usually do, isn't it? Was she forced to do the scene? Restrained? Those kind of things. Or did she said "well, I guess that's how it's done". That's, of course, assuming it actually happened at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/15 04:20 PM
3

Oh no, I meant the other way around. In at fault states, you "get" into cuckolding, so that, when you split, fault is duly recorded.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:00 PM
–

And now I can understand why cuckolding is a thing, if "at fault divorces" are a thing.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:42 PM
1

I think he thought that you were using that example as support that it's actually OK to do this, and tried to make you realize how stupid that sounded by comparing the knife with sperm, saying that you shouldn't be held liable for how people use things you give them.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/15 02:51 PM
4

Don't like reconstituted chicken, and it's ok. Don't like reconstituted pussy, that's a crime. No GMO, I'm gluten free, no way in hell I'd want fake pussy.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 10:38 PM
2

Lots of guys never consented to conception, only to sex. Seems like no doesn't always mean no.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 10:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter