TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Moonchopper Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by Moonchopper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Were you not agreeing with the reply to this woman? I suppose I made the incorrect inference that you were agreeing with the "fuck you, lady" portion of this guy's response. Apologies if that's not the case.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 04:13 PM
2

Taken at face value (i.e. without knowing this womans Facebook postings outside this one), I dont understand why you dont view this womans share as a fuck you to just her baby daddy? Why should we automatically assume shes saying fuck you to ALL dads? Is it possible people here are simply jumping on the bandwagon because of some inaccurately perceived attack on men?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 03:39 PM
7

I don't know that I would call it "their" arsenal... it's not as if those tactics are solely employed by women...
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:07 PM
-4

The "vocal radicalist minority" are the only ones actually doing something. citation needed
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:34 PM
15

Are you viewing the opinions of a vocal radicalist minority as representative of the whole?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:12 PM
1

Did you know that 100% of people who drink water die? Ergo, water kills people. It's a straight statistic. I don't need to defend facts.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 10:46 PM
1

Fair enough. I guess your argument about 'meh' to the glass ceiling doesn't really hold merit, then, if you aren't willing to defend the statistic you're citing.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:20 PM
1

Comparing 21 female CEOs to 382 male CEOs seems like dirty statistics. Why not take the median compensation packages of the top 21 females CEOs AND male CEOs?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:59 PM
1

So your stance on the whole Weinstein thing is "yea, guys a piece of shit, but not ALL the allegations have merit"?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:26 AM
8

*citation needed
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:56 PM
1

Let me guess, by "seeing it every day", you're talking about on Reddit or otherwise on the internet? I think you're suffering from confirmation bias, my friend. A vast majority of the women I personally know have not ever nor would ever use their sexuality to advance themselves. Statistically speaking, I'd wager that it doesn't happen as frequently as you seem to think. AND EVEN SO, how does other women behaving in a morally questionable way apply to the Weinstein problem? Are you saying it part…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:30 PM
0

Probably a hell of a lot fewer than YOU think, since you apparently seem to have a bone to pick with Hollywood actresses. You make it sound like every woman uses her sexuality all the time to get what they want.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:33 PM
1

I feel like the nuance you're missing here is the whole Implication bit from IASIP. If nothing else, this is evidenced (albeit circumstantially) by the massive amount of allegations leveled at Weinstein, and the fact that they have been hush-hush for so long -- so many people were aware of it, but no one wanted to risk their career over it in an industry that relies so heavily upon social connections. I won't pretend to know whether or not all of these allegations or true, but it seems at this p…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:03 PM
2

How is it an ‘abuse’ if both sides consent to, then fulfill, an agreement? Do you think that these were all simple one-time transactions completely devoid of any other context? Hollywood isn't the Red Light district where actors or actresses simply stroll by windows of TV producers and pick whose dick they're going to suck to get a part. Of course, if it is as simple as 'Suck my dick and you'll get the part' with absolutely no coercion, then I really can't qualify that as abuse. But do you truly…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 08:43 PM
1

Pretty fucked up that you think the blame is 50/50.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 08:07 PM
1

But by laying some of the blame at the feet of the women, you're removing some of the blame from Weinstein. Why should we give a shit whether or not the women used it to get ahead? It doesn't make Weinstein any less scummy, does it?
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:56 PM
-4

Yea, I guess I should really just be okay with blaming the women, and not the creepy old fuck taking advantage of them. After all, IM not the one that had to suck some dick, right?
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:55 PM
1

You're right, it's perfectly fine to offer someone a job if they'd only suck your dick. This culture is perfectly okay, and we should be blaming the women instead of the creepy old fucks perpetrating these acts.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:54 PM
0

God forbid people have a preference for their career path. What's wrong with calling out these shitheads that abuse their place of power to get sexual favors in exchange for film roles?
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:52 PM
0

Except we're talking about a man abusing power over women, so how is your statement even relevant?
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:48 PM
1

I think we're talking about repeat actions, not just "suck my dick and I'll give you the part." Also, it seems to me like it's much more "Keep servicing me, and I won't ruin your acting career (which you've probably been honing for years)". I don't understand why people are defending Weinstein. Is that behavior acceptable to you?
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:59 PM
4

Or they were basically completely shut out of the industry? When the only thing that determines whether or not you can get into the industry as a woman is having sex with a greasy old perv, do you think that's really okay? Shouldn't it be based on merit instead of whether or not you're willing to sell your body? And I'm willing to bet it didn't stop there, either. "Keep sucking my cock from time to time or your career in Hollywood is over". But no - it's "men vs. Women" I this sub because all th…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:52 PM
1

I've not seen this much damage in one space since Hiroshima. Y'all need jesus.
/r/MGTOW11/10/17 09:34 PM
3

'Under heavy load' is the key phrase. Even from this guy's explanation, if you connect the battery up to charge and then leave the phone be, it will be sufficient to charge the phone's battery.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:34 PM
1

If a boy who wants to join Boy Scouts has done nothing to improve Boy Scouts, then how is he any different from a girl who wishes to join Boy Scouts, and who has ostensibly done nothing to improve Boy Scouts?
/r/MGTOW01/07/17 07:01 PM
-1

I'm at a loss for how it's considered 'mooching' if a girl joined Boy Scouts, but it's not considered 'mooching' if a boy joined Boy Scouts?
/r/MGTOW30/06/17 09:12 PM
3

I think that the majority of the people in this sub simply want to see women suffer in any form for any of their decisions, really. It's pretty disgusting, but somehow I end up reading the comments anyways just to see how shitty some of the people here can be.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 05:38 AM
6

While I do pity this girl and her naïveté, I think OPs link is different than your example because the girl in this one kind of implies that her boyfriend wouldn't ever have any options to have sex with anyone else, evidenced by the fact that she refers to him as a homebody. So, really, this isn't a case of her trying to cash in a "pussy pass" so much as she was dishonest with her boyfriend (and herself) when she said she was okay with him going at it with another woman while she was away. Reall…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 05:25 AM
5

Is that perhaps because fewer men choose a teaching profession than women?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 03:20 AM
3

I'd really like to see you reply to /u/triplehelix_ when you get a chance, because I'd like to see how you justify your clearly-incorrect reply.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:57 PM
0

which also has a similar (though crucially different) men's version. which also has a similar (thought crucially different) women's version. You're a fool.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 11:32 PM
7

It would seem to me that, in the context of this issue, that the goals of feminism and men's rights overlap. Perhaps I'm making an assumption, but I believe that society's general view of what behavior is appropriate of a man and of a woman plays a large role in these statistics. Specifically, in the fact that a man who admits to being upset, depressed, or otherwise not 'a-okay' is somehow exhibiting traits/behavior exclusively reserved for the opposite sex - therefore, they are 'less of a man' …
/r/MensRights01/01/15 10:46 PM
23

I place very little stock in infographics like this, because it's very clearly posted with an agenda in mind, as opposed to presenting unbiased information. Just like politics - you can never really trust either side.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:03 PM
0

The reality is you were willing to dismiss the argument because of the gender making it, and then tried to twist the argument to make it fit your dismissal. I already replied to this, but I wanted to call it out again - the reply that I made to you (not Bodertz - check the usernames, they jumped in on this) was a tautological argument, not one in which I was dismissing your opinion due to your presumed sex. If you reread my statement, then I think you'll find that you misunderstood me (or you yo…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:48 PM
1

but you were ready to dismiss my observations and experiences on the basis of my presumed sex. I replied to your other post, but for what it's worth, no, it was not an effort to dismiss your opinion/observations/experiences based upon your presumed sex. It was not an attempt to discredit you. I was going the path of a tautological argument, in that if you are a man, then your statement about 'calling out [posers]' fell directly in line with the 'geek' panel of the strip, lending credence to the …
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:37 PM
1

The problem with your argument is proportion; if a lot of girls bully other girls, and one or two guys here and there go along with it, guys in general are not as responsible for its existence as the girls who initiate, proliferate, and enforce it. You present a compelling argument, and I think this is the meat of the issue, if not perhaps the issue. I haven't seen it to the scale that you have, but then again, I'm a man, so perhaps I simply don't notice it since I'm not a 'victim' of said bully…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:27 PM
1

I agree with you wholeheartedly, but I do not believe oneiorosgrip was arguing that point. I hate the idea of grouping one sex together and placing generalities upon an entire group of people, but I felt that was secondary to the point that was being discussed.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:00 PM
1

Is 'Rule #1' an actual rule on one of these subreddits? Or is this just a rule that MensRights has arbitrarily made up because of the butthurt surrounding feminism? Im inclined to believe the latter, but your statement seems to imply the former? And for what its worth, I wouldnt consider myself a feminist. I dont subscribe to any of these 'rules' you guys are talking about - which is why I'm inclined to believe they're just made up.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:11 PM
1

I think you put this much better than I was able to. Thank you.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:57 AM
-3

Again, these aren't rational arguments. They're your feels coming to light. Get over them. They have no meaning in a discussion like this, especially when you've been presented with evidence against them. I use 'I feel' and 'I believe' because I recognize that I don't know everything there is to know about these topics - no one possibly could, despite how well read one might believe they are. I leave room for doubt rather than stating my own opinions as fact. I recognize that my own anecdotal ex…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 11:14 PM
-2

If men are proliferating this type of bullying, then they are to blame just as much as women are. THAT is the point that I am arguing. I am arguing against the statement that you made that 'men are not to blame' in the case of OPs strip. If you believe I am arguing a point different from yours, then you should present your argument in a clearer manner. As for how I believe 'posers' should be handled, I don't personally care if someone pretends to like something I like merely so they can seem 'co…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 10:47 PM
-1

In reference to the above pic, no - in this case, men aren't to blame. You are categorically stating that men do not engage in this kind of bullying. This is what started this whole line of debate. Men engage in this type of bullying - do you deny this? Because if you believe that yes, men DO engage in this type of bullying, just to a lesser extent than women, then your entire argument is bunk, because this would imply that men SHARE the blame with women - just as /u/npanetta stated. If you beli…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:27 PM
-6

Regardless, my comment above is about the fact that it is women who are sniping at women over these things, not a denial of their existence I'm having a really hard time believing that you are so blind to your own wording, so I would like to clarify what it is I'm seeing here, and I want to see if it matches up with what YOU believe you are trying to say: Your statements make it sound like you believe that men do not subscribe to this kind of 'shaming/ridicule/bullying.' If this is correct, then…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:11 PM
2

i was asserting that rule #1, not fighting it. Sorry, I stated it in a convoluted manner - I was arguing that your example was not a terribly good supporting argument that 'Female subreddits' subscribe to Rule #1. Does that make more sense? Ultimately, in my opinion, the guy and the girl in the example do not share equal blame - thus, you might as well just go ahead and say that the guy is at fault. Regardless of how naive the girl was being, what the guy did was completely shitty, and he does n…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:59 PM
-5

In the context of social media and the internet, I believe the sexes are equal in the way they bully anyone. Specifically, I have seen many more instances of the geek girl panel (men saying this to women) than I have from women, as well as the 'rape' panel. Additionally, I've seen variations of the 'fake plastic bitch' panel mixed from both sexes. Also, you state that 'Male bullies are more often directly confrontational.' The panels in this post are examples of direct confrontation. Do you see …
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:52 PM
-5

Source for said 'fact'? I have a suspicion you're going to find it VERY hard to find any type of official consensus/report for that. Maybe calling it a 'fact' isn't wholly accurate. This just sounds like you're making it up to fit your own agenda.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 07:36 PM
7

I'm feeling like maybe there was more context - i.e. she didn't go up to someone and ask them if they wanted her nudes. It was probably a situation where they started talking to someone, things got hot and heavy, and they ended up exchanging pictures (or maybe she was the only one to send some). If this were the case, then I would agree wholeheartedly with them - she (naively) placed her trust in said stranger, and that stranger abused her trust by uploading the pictures online. Hate to say it, …
/r/MensRights21/01/14 07:34 PM
1

I did what I could :(
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:35 PM
2

You're presenting no more hard evidence than he is, which makes you both the same in my book.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter