TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Morbidicus Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by Morbidicus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Women also do with drugs
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:02 PM
1

I love the irony of feminist. Equal pay day we will charge men more...
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:48 PM
2

This assumes that is the only likely outcome. Suppose you didn't see a murder and you claim you did and say the suspect through a gun in the water that was never recovered. Testimony cannot be verified if it lacks evidence.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:15 AM
1

You shouldn't be obligated to, I personally would try regardless of the person's sex.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:22 PM
84

I bet sooner or later they will claim male birth control is a rape enabler or something like that.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 02:58 PM
1

False reports can be and often do lead to charges, at least here in Texas. However the general idea amongst prosecutors is that they would rather let a liar go free than scare of real victims with fear their story won't be believed. Now that is obvious injustice and sexist. I believe it should be the same thing with driving a car drunk. If drink people cannot give consent, then should they be reliable for the countless deaths drunks cause annually? With feminist mentality applied to that scenari…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:06 AM
2

It is a crime to drive drunk, why not?
/r/MensRights06/10/16 02:46 AM
3

When you specifically make a female cast or a male cast remake of something, expect fans not to agree with it. That is what happened here, they were told from the start fans didn't approve, and now they are pulling this stuff.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 04:36 PM
0

They should be paid the same, if a man can't break down a door to save someone, they can't do thier job. Same goes for women.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:47 PM
0

So you can have sex with 14 year olds?
/r/MensRights22/09/16 11:32 PM
7

Sexist as sexism can be right there.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 06:00 PM
4

The statue of limitations is almost irrelevant as it is. They can't put people in prison for an accused rape when there would be no possible way to verify something happening 15 plus years ago short of a video.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 05:50 PM
2

They use words like "systematically destroy". I don't recall that in the definition of objectification, racism, or even sexism.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:37 AM
1

I don't think that is bad at all. The whole idea of being sexually attracted to someone else and calling out thier good physical features isn't a bad thing. It is only natural, it is why we are attracted to each other in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 05:59 AM
1

Tell her to not lock the doors at night and see if she is willing to do that. Start out by saying we shouldn't have to worry about people entering our house and stealing stuff or potentially harming us. Basically the same thing with drinking and rape. It shouldn't happen, we need to do everything we can to reduce the risk of that happening. Such as being aware people out there will take advantage of people the very second they are able to and a sit down and chat (education) won't necisarily stop…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 09:40 PM
23

This is completely irrelevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:48 PM
8

Requiring anyone to join a draft is not desirable. But it makes sense to sign women up as well even if they don't get combat roles. However this could pose a problem and make any sort of non combat role within the military be viewed as a woman's position. That would mean men sign up overwhelmingly for infantry instead of a nice mix into other categories.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 04:19 PM
1

I'm not sure the point of what you are trying to make sense a lot of these points I agree with and never detested. The main point I made was that during the early days of feminism, the majority of feminist had a legitimate cause and thier main goal wasn't hatred of men. I'm not referencing single people, but feminist as a whole. As soon as feminist gained equality, they then piggy backed on the "trustworthy" campaign feminism has fought for in the past and started corrupting people into idiotic …
/r/MensRights21/04/16 05:01 PM
-1

there was always a radical branch of feminism, however the difference between then and now is centralized beliefs of feminism has shifted from women's rights to emasculation of men. Every feminist nowadays would be considered a radical by the standards back then.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:34 AM
0

I would say that the majority of feminist back then were rallied for a cause (women's rights) because there was a legitimate inequality. Nowadays the average feminist spews lies and hatred towards men.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:30 AM
8

People don't take into account what the male wants. Decisions like this shouldn't be made for someone. This is purely an old-age religious practice that is outdated and relatively pointless.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:10 PM
5

The new feminism definitely is. The first and second waves were more geared towards gaining equal rights for women. Modern feminism sort of piggy backs off of the earlier feminism to gain legitimacy so it can do so without the use of logic.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:01 PM
4

So... If the man legally has sex with someone and the female commits an illegal act. The man is responsible as well? Sounds like typical feminist arguments.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:13 PM
6

Proof that when feminist say they support males rights as well, they don't because they are content with having obvious human inequality laws like this.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 05:41 PM
3

How would they interrogate her without arresting her? If someone killed someone they wouldn't willingly go into the police station and confess to murder, especially if they were allowed to leave. This story isn't adding up for me atm. Have another source perhaps?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:21 PM
1

She won't even be required to register as a sex offender!?!?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:11 PM
1

You say this based on what? Your own experience? I know feminist are crazy, but I wouldn't say women as a whole have lowered in quality.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:03 PM
1

I wouldn't say feminism has lowered the quality of women as much as changed the relationship itself. I know plenty of women in my college that plan to be stay at home mother, and vice verse. It is sort of messed up to think the majority of women would ditch thier love right after he gets injured. I would think they wouldn't, but that might just be my optimism. I also doubt there are studies regarding this question so it isn't reliable to say either way.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:45 AM
1

Your response doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 08:53 PM
10

I wouldn't categorize all women like this. My grandpa had a stroke and left himself bed ridden, my grandmother helped him and still does many years later. The lady in the story is just an entitled biotch whom divorced a guy who suffered from a stroke and is now trying to take his stuff. She should be shamed by everyone she meets.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 04:05 PM
2

Being that crazy, she would have to be. Baaaa dum tis....
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:47 PM
5

This is insane, the two previous judges want the mother to have custody of the kids that they look over the fact that the sex offender freaking sexually abused his step daughter.... No father should have to live with the knowledge that thier children are spending nights over at a house were a sexual predator is with them. Freaking insane!
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:49 PM
3

So she claimed she was raped, a magazine wrote a story about it. It was found out she wasn't raped, and she is suing for 7 million because she says the magazine should have known she was lying? What a crazy person.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:35 PM
3

Why are thier transgender men as well? I don't think that stuff really has much to do with who has won. Caitlyn (Bruce) Jenner more likely did the change to bring more attention to the family seeing how they made a reality TV show literally days after the change. There are others who go through this process due to thier personal feelings, I wouldn't say anyone has won.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 05:55 PM
2

I don't think attractiveness should be considered in any scenario since it is so objective in nature. The facts are that they were both consenting adults, one was a teaching and broke a code of ethics. She didn't rape or assault anyone sexually so I completely disagree with her being a sexual offender. Breaking the code of ethics or whatever she signed as a teacher should result in her job being terminated, not a felony charge and her life ruined. The guy has also been negatively effected by thi…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:14 PM
20

The dude was 18. I definitely believe it is wrong for a teacher to have sexual relations with a student . But I wouldn't call the guy a victim since it was consensual and he is an adult. She should lose her job, but she shouldn't be labeled a sex offender.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:10 AM
1

Is it state law? That a women can put a child up for adoption without the consent of the father?
/r/MensRights29/03/16 01:47 AM
57

The child should never have been placed with a foster family until the dad signed as well.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:32 PM
1

No I am not saying the military will ever be 50-50. However as technology rises, the need for non-infantry military personnel that specialize in certain things will grow. Because of this, female representation within the military will as well. To state that the largest budget in this was spent on men when in reality it wasn't spent specifically on men but on our military which is gender neutral. Many women are getting the same benefits AND this sort of aid is attainable by women. The aid mention…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:13 PM
3

I'm sure the women who perform better or at least have more fans get more money than other women. But when it comes to men earning more than women, ohhhh noooo that cant happen. It would be sexist to pay the men what they are worth.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:59 PM
2

Even though there is a disparity between males and females within the military, veteran aid is still gender/sex neutral. As more women join the military, the more aid women will get. Veterans are still a small percentage of men nationwide, and many men (and women) cannot join the military due to health conditions.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:32 PM
1

This is promising.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:20 PM
2

He has a very strong case! And it seems he has a good lawyer. I hope the outcome of this is a good and that it gains publicity. Could really help the publics view on the accused.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:07 PM
4

That and a private personal apology.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:42 AM
36

She is being charged with misdemeanor battery. I am against harsh punishments as well (for this sort of offense), but if the people involved were reversed the young boy may have very well been labeled a sex offender.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:34 PM
1

You are completely missing the point. The results of a study when applied to a general population is not fact but an educated assumption. You can say research supports the idea that men have on average a higher IQ, but you absolutely cannot state it as fact (if you wish to be taken seriously within the scientific community). The statement that men have a higher IQ is only ta fact when referencing the studies, not the general population. It is a fact that men WITHIN the study scored higher, it is…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 10:57 PM
1

It isn't a fact, at least the way you are trying to state. This has nothing to do with social justice. You are trying to say that men have higher IQ's (mean) than women. That is supported by certain studies but it is NOT fact. A research study doesn't indicate fact, I already explained a sample population doesn't necisarily reflect the general population. The goal of a study is to reduce the error probability by trying to get a sample population that is similar to the general population. However…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 05:01 PM
1

It isn't anywhere close to fact. The statistical likelihood is one thing, that is an actual process so I commend you on your quick google search. There is no grey area with fact. A fact would be men scored higher in thier IQ test within this study. It couldn't be applied to the general population EVER and be labeled a fact. IQ literally has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:40 PM
2

Sure seems that way doesn't it!
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:50 PM
1

There is a reason that scientist and researchers do not call the results of a study fact. They word it specifically as "this study supports the idea that x.....". It is one of the rules in research. Also even if men did absolutely have a higher IQ, it wouldn't be a basic fact either. It would be a very, very complex fact. I currently participate in research studies in my college so I am well aware of how studies work. You are not doing yourself a favor by calling the results of a study fact of a…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:58 PM
1

Men IQ was shown higher in this study. That isn't necisarily fact(when applied to general population) and here is why. It is done on a sample population which if changed could easily result in different results. If we have the same sample population retake IQ test, the results could be quite different as well. It isn't a fact that men in general have higher IQ's, only that the men in the study did. It isn't touchy-feely stuff either. Read the forum's title, MEN's Rights. This post is off topic a…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:20 PM
6

girls mature faster than boys, so I don't understand the logic that the boy takes full responsibility. Statistically speaking, the girl would definitely be able to grasp the idea of sex perhaps even more so than the boy. Why aren't feminist groups tackling this if they want equality?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:57 PM
1

Well studies also show men have lower IQ's than women on a much more stratified basis. This isn't necisarily fact either, it is the finding of a study which can bear different results even if one uses the very same respondents. It is okay to use the study for something, but it is pointless to simply say "men have a higher IQ" when it isn't related to any sort of inequality. Men's rights has gotten a name for being sexist and women bashing (even though that isn't the point of it at all). And it i…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:13 PM
8

This type of stuff (title) steers women away from MRA. I'd recommend using this study in coordination with something relevant to equality and not with a rub-it-in their faces tone.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:06 PM
8

I've noticed some anti-women comments here. But I'd like to point out something. Every forum involving gender and sex will have really sexist comments. I also do the same as you, I am subscribed to feminism thread (even though they banned me for being subscribed to MRA) in hopes to reduce my own bias (me being male). The main point I have is that a lot of core points and goals of modern day feminism has significantly negative effects for men. I can list a lot of cases where feminist ideology dir…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:35 PM
4

Great post!
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:10 PM
22

This thinking is exactly why non-consensual circumcision still happens today. Society's lack of empathy or care for the male penis and testicles makes us the victims of harsh double standards and (often times) unwanted mutilation.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 05:59 PM
4

lol, Poe's law just happened.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:51 PM
-5

Agreed
/r/MensRights02/02/16 06:30 PM
13

I'd sue the petition starters for defamation.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:18 PM
3

Feminism "ruins people's lives without consequences", as long as the lives ruined are male.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 04:04 PM
2

Great link
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:07 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:38 PM
3

"The point here is that they need to learn to be protective of their sons too." That is the key issue here, I agree. This is sort of supporting the exposable male theory since the young boys safety isn't as important and a girl's his age, and even less important than a grown woman. Maybe he was walking her home, what if something happened? How would a drunk adult properly care for a child? Or make rational thoughts? I know you probably agree with the purpose of those questions, just wanted to th…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:07 AM
2

Oh yeah!
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:00 AM
3

I don't understand what her issue was with having a men's yearly debate. She admitted that the issues he brought up were legitamate, said she supported talking about those problems, and then went on to say she doesn't want a national men's debate. No logical conclusion that I can come up with helps me understand this.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:47 AM
10

It is bad because men are statistically more likely to be injured or killed when walking home. So if they were worried about the woman's safety, they should have driven her home. Completely outrageous to put a 12 year old in the position of having to fight for a grown ups protection, he didn't even know the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:34 AM
18

"have zero tolerance for harassment based on gender," "Pied Piper additionally forbids man-splaining," ....lol
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:53 PM
8

Pay a woman till you retire, then be denied the ability to retire. Yeah, marriage is not for me, I'll just continue to take myself out to eat and watch movies at the theater by myself, hell, way cheaper.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:50 PM
2

I got banned on my first post in the thread called getting mad at feminism is like getting mad at the word mankind or something like that. My post was woMAN, MAN = MANkind. I have asked for clarification on why I was banned, but no reply as of yet.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:50 AM
1

No doubt, I'm talking about it is more dangerous than anything feminist are "oppressed" with. My point may have been misleading, I meant that feminist cry out inequality and say horrible things happen to women, yet the draft is far worse. The draft results in forcing men into horrible situations often resulting in an agonizing death or deformity on the basis of gender, and women get a free pass.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:21 PM
2

Yes they should, men being forced to go into the military and possibly die on the sole basis that they were born male is institutionalized sexism, that is far more dangerous than anything feminist can come up with.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:53 AM
26

The supposed privilege of of men is ironically falsified by the fact that men can't even have a simple campus group that others get to in joy.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter