TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Moreonthatlater Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Moreonthatlater on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Like a good professional victim or an incompetent intellectual, I highly recommend you assume I'm "trolling" you. It's a perfect way to vilify any opposition to your fascist views. You can simply dismiss them without concern. It's completely moronic for you to portray circumcision as some type of purely aesthetic procedure. That's like saying brush your teeth is just an ego-sport. And now you're claiming that circumcision is akin to having sex with children? You put the "F" in "FUCKING IDIOT."
/r/MensRights24/02/11 08:16 AM
-3

I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but some guys can do all the cleaning in the world and their foreskin still causes them odor/hygiene/health related problems. And it's a choice that is much easier for a parent to make for their child when they are younger and will have zero recollection of the procedure. And the STD info is just false.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 08:06 AM
-3

Sure, if you use the feminist tactic of demonizing language to mean whatever you want, then you can suppress any freedom or right and feel justified about doing so. I'll give you an example: Why are you trying to rape young boys? Oh and by "rape young boys," I mean "force your fanatically distorted views on others by demonizing their words/actions." See. It's easy to play the dishonest rhetoric game. And if you need a "clue," trying taking that logic over to your nearest school and telling teach…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:54 AM
–

It's not any more "barbaric" than dentistry or surgery. These fascists are just using the same tactics feminists use. They're trying to demonize your actions using 1984 doublespeak. Next time one of these hypocrites visits the dentist, call them a "barbarian" and stone them for being infidels.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:47 AM
–

Equating circumcision to plastic surgery is like equating dentistry to MMA fighting. I guess next time you go to the dentist, just visit the octagon instead and hope the guy knocks out the right tooth that's giving you problems?
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:44 AM
-1

Looks like you got a downvote for telling the truth. Next they'll be calling for your head. I'm not sure who's more dangerous; the feminists who wish to rob men of their rights based on good intentions. or the MRAs who wish to rob parents of their rights based on good intentions.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:43 AM
-2

I'm with you. Unfortunately, we're subjected to these fanatical hypocrites week after week. Circumcision this, circumcision that. No wonder few people take this subreddit seriously. It's full of retards who insist on having their rights respected WHILE having the audacity to blindly and willfully rob others of theirs.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:41 AM
–

You got upvotes for advocating stoning Timmy to death or equating a helpful medical procedure to capital punishment. I guess I should get about 700 upvotes for mentioning the fact that I'm wearing socks and drinking Snapple.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:40 AM
–

Yes. And you're also not allowed to violate the rights of parents who wish to raise their own children as they see fit. Just as others shouldn't have the right to prevent you from going to a surgeon to get your appendix removed.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:38 AM
-5

I agree. And I also think it should be done when you're a child. It's much harder to even think about getting snipped when you're an adult. And that's exactly what most of these anti-circumcision people are gambling on. I had it done when I was a baby and have absolutely NO MEMORY of the event. In fact, it's a non-event in my life. But I'm very happy I am circumcised and I'm glad it was done when I was young and there's much less pain involved. As an adult, it's much easier to recollect how much…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:34 AM
–

That's a lie. Many doctors know that there are health benefits (already stated) to circumcision that many in here willfully ignore. No, circumcision is not going to cure cancer. But yes, there are definite health benefits that a person will enjoy by getting circumcised. Should it be mandatory? Of course not. But should we fanatically feel entitled to rob loving parents of their right to care for their children as they see fit, especially considering there is DOCUMENTED MEDICAL EVIDENCE showing t…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:25 AM
–

Yes, but just like fanatical feminists, many of these guys are getting all emotionally worked up and passing off bad information as the gospel. Obviously this is a total lie because many men who are circumcised know perfectly well that there's absolutely nothing wrong with them. To so obviously misrepresent the dangers is not only dishonest, it's fanatical and dangerous because they eventually want to infringe on the rights of the parents. This is the greatest irony of all consider these men wan…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:21 AM
-1

Oh look. Another downvote for making sense. They should just call this Fanatical Agenda Reddit where you're penalized for using your brain.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 05:56 AM
-1

Actually, judging by the lack of education displayed here in this glorified popularity contest, I should've have said it's like comparing a reddit downvote to Egyptian tear gas canisters.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 05:53 AM
-4

Yep, just as suspected. Downvoted for making sense. While we're at it why don't we just start having a popularity contest to see who has the prettiest hair ? This is turning into WOMEN'S EMOTIONAL CHICK LOGIC REDDIT vs. men's rights. Shameful.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 05:45 AM
–

Then if your baby has a cleft lip or is born prematurely and needs an operation or medical assistance, it's EQUALLY wrong for you to make any of those decisions as well. Try telling someone that it should be illegal to care for their child as they see fit. If you tried to force your fanatical views on my family, you had better have a gun. Because I'll defend my family to the death against fanatics like you. Hopefully, you can see the flaw with your approach.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 05:42 AM
–

An infant is not able to make that choice from birth, nor should an infant be allowed to make that choice. The PARENTS ALONE should be making that choice, NOT YOU, NOT THE STATE. It is fascist and hypocritical to force your alarmist, uneducated views on others, especially if the child doesn't belong to you. See the problem here?
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:49 AM
–

There are many other studies that say JUST THE OPPOSITE. If we're going to simply rest our case on the fallacy of medical authority, we may as well cite the founding fathers of the constitution to support the institution of slavery. We've heard from many doctors who know better, who have no problem telling the truth about the incidents of urinary infections, increased STD risk, etc. I mean if you really want to go this route, you're basically undermining the entire point of this "Men's Rights" r…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:46 AM
2

No, there's actual hair on the shaft for some people and it's perfectly natural.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:32 AM
–

So in your delusional mind, brushing your teeth equates to raping children with barbaric witchcraft devices. You don't sound too bright. And the fact that you're getting upvotes proves that the people backing this delusional agenda aren't that bright either. You should get upvotes for proving a point, not calling something "shitty." Otherwise, I should get 300 upvotes for calling your argument poopy kaka.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:29 AM
0

This is a complete lie. This is no better than feminists claiming that 1 out of 4 women are raped. From now on, I'm just going to make up my own informal studies and say that 10 out of 15 UNCIRCUMSIZED men get struck by lightning. It's a peer reviewed "scientific study" (...just don't ask me to cite the "peers," how I found them, what I consider good or bad "science," how much "studying" I actually did, how I recorded the results, what my initial bais was, who had a financial interest in my stud…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:27 AM
–

To compare male circumcision to female genital mutilation is like comparing a spanking to a beating with a baseball bat. Totally ridiculous and intellectually dishonest comparison.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:27 AM
–

Oh you mean like surgery to remove a bad appendix or dentistry to remove/fix a bad tooth? When you apply alarmist tactics that feminists employ (like equating whistling at a girl to "rape"), you lose all credibility. It's an intellectually dishonest tactic to demonize circumcision as "mutilation." Otherwise, to be consistent, you'd have to refer to EVERY SINGLE SURGEON, EYE DOCTOR, DENTIST OR DERMATOLOGIST as a "mutilator." And since we all know you hypocritically don't do that, we can conclude …
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:07 AM
–

You are correct. It's fascist logic to think that someone else should be able to tell you how to parent your own kid. Next they'll be making laws about how you're allowed to hold your dick when you pee.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:04 AM
–

Well what you would call it and what actual doctors would call it are, thankfully, two different things.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 03:01 AM
–

Well the solution is to find a competent doctor next time. Not burn down an entire hospital that gave you a faulty bandaid.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 02:59 AM
0

Obviously you're too dense to see the point that every reasonable person on here has ALREADY made: injecting infants with vaccines is unnecessary. Filling in cavities is unnecessary. Eating vegetables is unnecessary. Disciplining unruly children who cause disruptions in class is unnecessary. All these things are unnecessary and leave permanent effects. When you define "unnecessary" to mean "everything I disagree with" and you define "permanent effects" to mean "anything that my alarmist uneducat…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 02:58 AM
-3

This is like Paris Hilton complaining that she only has 5 billion dollars instead of 10 billion.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 02:52 AM
–

And just because YOU fail to report the health complications with being uncircumcised doesn't mean others haven't. You can thank BAD DOCTORS for your circumcision. Your poor logic would lead people to burn dentists if anyone ever loses a crown or a filling.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 02:26 AM
–

Actually I don't trust you. I've been circumsized and I'm glad I got it done. Trust me, being uncircumsized sucks.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 02:19 AM
–

Well people can also make the case that their lack of circumcision caused them to experience more PAINFUL urinary infections, more PAINFUL smegma odor and more PAINFUL STDs. It's amazing how many people here blindly/religiously adhere to alarmist propaganda about circumcision while completely neglecting to engage in healthy discourse about it. If you're afraid of telling the truth, don't expect people outside of this reddit to ever take you seriously. Well... unless you decide to run for congres…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 02:06 AM
–

If you equate a healthy medical procedure to "mutilation," then you must apply that same ridiculous reasoning to dentistry which would fall under the "mutilation" of the mouth.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 01:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter