TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Morichalion Archive

View 0 posts and 161 comments by Morichalion on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Interesting. How does one know where the donations come from?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:31 PM
62

Why does this fun little story not have "...I called the cops..." anywhere in it? Y'know... I don't even care, there's no good reason not to have called the cops. Call the cops now, if you haven't yet. Beyond that, see what options you have in the way of restraining orders. Then come back and we'll have a group hug.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:39 AM
2

Lots of words for what amounts to "god says" and "but fgm, though..." If one needs to lean on some supernatural creature to support their argument, they're generally wrong. It's really weird to see a woman quote the bible for anything. Parts of that book tell women to shut up and let the men talk. Other parts of the book basically equate female slaves to blow up dolls. It is NOT a feminist tome. Fgm is an odd thing to bring up in this context. It's illegal to perform such procedures in the US, s…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:43 PM
10

Looks at calendar Looks at article The article linked to is 9 years old. Many, if not most, of the people in power at the time have been replaced with new ones. This is a fucked up story, true, but it's not terribly helpful to continue dredging up crap from a decade ago.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:52 AM
4

Get a lawyer. Record any interaction you have with this lady, and keep those records handy. Get a lawyer. Decide as soon as possible if you want to be in the child's life, your actions now might have some effect on that possibility. Get a lawyer. In all aspects of this, expect her to do the "wrong thing" irrespective of you doing the "right thing." Get a lawyer. Be calm. Get a lawyer. Unless you're recording your interaction with her, drop the call. Get a lawyer. Did I mention get a lawyer?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:52 PM
2

Wow. I wonder what the judge was smoking.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:37 AM
3

What's the context for this? I mean, it's a small piece of paper attached to a wall. I could create a very similar image using a wall in my home. This smacks of building a personal-level straw man to burn. Not a valuable way to spend time.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:27 AM
3

Keep the note in the off chance that you might need it. Y'know, document everything... Pretend the note doesn't exist and try to move on. There's really no point in saying anything. "Go die in a fire you bitch" will help no one beyond giving you a moment to vent. If she sends too many notes, contact the police if you feel safe doing so, and consult a lawyer. Above all, keep your head as level as possible.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 11:39 PM
1

Maybe a small message in the sidebar explaining it is not endorsed? Making a list of trolls would turn into a full-time job. There's a list of /r/MensRights mods in the sidebar, along with some basic information regarding the subreddit. This is enough for a rational person to get a basic idea of the community.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:29 PM
1

It's "US" and "THEM." US is good! US is strong! US morally right! THEM is bad! THEM is weak! THEM morally wrong! Any bad thing said about THEM is true, any bad thing said about US is false. Any good thing said about THEM is false, any good thing said about US is true. The rules by which we judge THEM is different from the rules by which we judge US. The rationale is no more complicated than that. You can replace US and THEM with any kind of "opposed" groups. Christians and Muslims. Whites and bl…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:15 PM
1

Worth a giggle. It's difficult to turn the story into something of value beyond that. But... a giggle has value.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:18 PM
1

So... this happened in Kenya. I don't really care about what happens in Kenya. How they write and execute their rules has little effect on my country. That aside... The story is a blurb. There's very little information to go on. It's too early to rage on this, at least in the typical social-justice method of raging. No such recourse for the infant boys who die from MGM. You need to find substantiation for this claim, preferably specific to the jurisdiction that the news blurb came from.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:56 PM
2

assuming that I could find the data that was gathered I'm going nowhere for the moment.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:46 PM
2

That'd be the point I'd be aiming for, assuming that I could find the data that was gathered and currently being parroted.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:59 PM
1

Unfortunately, many people respond poorly to those with differing opinions. It certainly doesn't help to start with the flinging of feces, but keeping a level head can be difficult for some folks. I'm happy folks were nice to you. :)
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:07 PM
2

I'd like to examine the data, if I could get my hands on the poll results being referenced, anyway. I'm having trouble finding it.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:01 PM
1

If one was curious about the data gathered in this survey, where would one go to find it? I feel like combing over the data myself.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:29 PM
2

I don't know that it'll do a whole heck of a lot of good, but this bot I made will announce to the world that the user is lying within 5 minutes of their post. Go say hi.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 02:33 AM
1

I made such a bot this week. Go say hi.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 02:29 AM
1

I made such a bot this week. Go say hi.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 02:28 AM
3

halfway done. I've figured out how to scrape user history and store it in a local database. Tomorrow night I should have version 0.0.001 done. It's not the weekend... I shouldn't be playing....
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:56 AM
3

3 month old account, less than a full page of activity on the account. None of the comments posted by this nut have positive karma (though some are close o.O). I wouldn't concern myself too much over this. If you feel like doing "something" post a list of /r/MensRights mods, and mention that the dipshit isn't on that list. Might be fun to write a bot that does it automatically. A fun weekend project, maybe. Maybe I'll give it a shot this weekend. Hmm...
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:51 AM
1

but I still have feelings for her. STOP THAT. Seriously. Focus on keeping yourself rational. and has now suggested we avoid attorneys and do the divorce settlement ourselves. Don't do this. I mean, consult with an attorney first, before you make this decision. There's no happy way to deal with splitting up the pets... Worst case scenario she lawyers up in which case I win financially You really haven't been divorced, have you... If you have been involved with a fucking psycho woman before you kn…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:05 PM
0

I think beastiality was against the law...
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:00 PM
1

Didn't watch the video.... I got the gist of it, though, I think. If you're sitting in your home with the blinds closed, you can safely assume you're not being photographed or videotaped. The moment you open your front door, you're fair game. I can take as many pictures of you, with or without consent, as I want if you're in public. There might be rules regarding certain venues; theaters and the like... I'm betting these were staged events, though.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:38 PM
1

The issue of abortion comes up every so often here. It's really not a valuable discussion to have, way too many emotions involving the tears of Jesus or something like that. I've yet to hear a pro-life nut give a reasonable argument regarding the subject. It IS a men's rights issue, if we're presenting the topic of parental rights and responsibility. In an environment where abortion procedures are safe and affordable (and it should be), a woman finds herself with options during the whole process…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:11 AM
7

I found it here. If nothing else, it's a good place to start if the OP fails to add additional information regarding his post. I kinda skimmed it, but didn't read it in detail, because it's late and I have to go to work in the morning. It seems to be general psychology stuff rather than anything regarding any one specific ideology. Really... I don't know how one would "stumble upon" this text when "researching feminist theory." A (very) slightly wider camera on this image would have revealed the…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 02:56 AM
3

e=Mc<sup>2</sup> is, apparently, a sexist equation. Physics, in general, is a masculine social construct. I think... Even on the best of days trying to understand this stuff makes my head spin... It's spinny today, lemme tell ya.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 02:40 AM
2

If I know you're listening, then you're "participating" and can record the conversation.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 09:59 PM
1

Without some more context, this doesn't help. In fact, adding accurate context makes this a less-than-worthless type of rant. Women have no place in certain men-only places under most conditions, and should be challenged when willfully attempting to circumnavigate those rules. If you're in the men's locker room or the men's dorm, I'm going to ask why. Men have no place in certain women-only places under most conditions, and should be challenged when willfully attempting to circumnavigate those r…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:08 PM
3

Need to give some context for this. It really makes no sense as it is just now.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 10:27 PM
6

From a men's rights standpoint, I didn't see conversation about Sarkeesian's video series to be valuable when she started her video series, and I don't see it as valuable now. Really, I just didn't believe she was going to be successful at framing her arguments in a compelling and professional way. From what I've heard about her video series, I'm not wrong. From the "artist" perspective, I'm kinda ticked off. Actually, REALLY ticked off. At LOTS of people. Probably even a good portion of the peo…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:35 PM
4

... um.... wow... this is beyond insane... I would have sworn this was some kind of satire, but it's on their page, their facebook page, linked to by their twitter...
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:13 PM
0

Why don't you tell me which arguments you've heard from pro-life people? No... that's not the way this works. At least, not the way it's supposed to. YOU want to deny rights to people, justify it. Talk about fetal pain, sluts, preexisting souls, moral penalties for sex, too few babies, show fetus pictures, the availability of contraception, "Gawd says..." all that bullshit. YOU are supposed to explain why limiting certain rights makes sense. And tell me the premise upon which you rest your pro-c…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:33 AM
1

Nah, I put it where I wanted to... seemed to fit there. Lovely evening, btw.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:43 AM
0

You're acting as if you're spouting universal truths here. No... but I've heard most of the material that comes from the pro-life crowd and I'm less impressed by it every day. The debate on 'reproductive rights' or whatever is still a debate. No... it's a shouting and shock-value match. Maybe a series of "Fuck you," "No, fuck YOU!!!" type of exchanges. Sometimes a good show. For example: http://www.kansascity.com/2014/01/22/4769307/sonogram-in-senate-committee-room.html There are plenty of argum…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:42 AM
3

So you're saying they should redesign MLP? Maybe something like this? http://youtu.be/-Z7UnO66q9w Really, it felt to me like the animator did a great job of keeping the personalities together for that little short. :P ... ... Gah... There's no value in getting pissy about the distribution of genders in a show, any show. Doing so feels like REACHING for a reason to be offended. Y'know, "it's been twelve hours since I've been enraged, and I know I SHOULD be, but I just can't think of a good reason…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:18 AM
4

but to declare that argument over and settled as pro-choice has won is ridiculous. No one did that. I DID say it's not worth getting into anymore, because there's no new arguments. Even if you were oblige /u/Nukemarine, you would be adding nothing new to the cacophony. Really, in the slightly more narrow field of "men's rights", being "pro-life" makes zero sense, even if you had some emotional reason for it. Simultaneously denying the rights of others, while claiming them for yourself, is just s…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:51 AM
-5

Which one do you want to change? You can only pick one. If you want to change the one on the right, you're wrong. Lots of reasons WHY you're wrong, but it's really not worth getting into anymore. The been gone over and over billions of times. If you want to change the on left, then we can have a discussion.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 03:29 AM
10

What does "Brigade warning | locked" mean on /r/offmychest? I read the sidebar, but couldn't find the answer.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 02:15 AM
1

Of course one should not treat them in a different way because of their choice. All I wanted to hear... :P Sorry, this whole thread has me wound up. There's obviously causes for these traits, lots of generations of groups facing down other groups and the groups that protected their women best got to stay alive.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:43 AM
2

Too frequently I see sentiments where instead of encouraging society to accept those who choose nontraditional gender roles; society seems to be moving to look down on people who don't. Depends on the role we're discussing. Generally, women who opt to be a stay-at-home wife tend to be looked down by other women as they don't fit the feminist philosophy. What if I want to be a provider, a breadwinner, a traditionally masculine person? Why can't I decide to be that AND not be subjected to prejudic…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:22 AM
3

Is it justifiable to treat them poorly for such choices, and why? This was the important question... why ignore it?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:50 AM
2

Depends on how often you seek out social justice, and how often I end up in the middle of it. I don't think I'd loathe you. It takes a lot to get that reaction out of me. So far, you haven't proposed hurting anyone or adopting policies that are expressly designed to hurt anyone, which is really the line of thinking that inspires loathing from me. I doubt I'd seek out your company, though. I'm white, straight, and male. Y'know, the most evil of races, sexual identity, and genders. I'm tired of be…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:09 AM
1

Uh... sure I'm not stepping on toes anywhere? You are still grinding that axe, right?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:34 AM
1

I don't often go to tumblr. When I do, it's usually because I'm trying to find the source for some web comic someone posts on other subs.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:57 AM
1

You're trying to pick a fight where there's none to be had. I'd say you ARE challenged.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:48 AM
4

I'd guess that the post is serious. At least, I'm taking it to be. There's a bit of disagreement on that issue of gender roles here. The best answer I have is, "depends on who you talk to." Sometimes, "depends on the very narrow-specific issue we're talking about." For the most part, judging from how the votes are falling on various comments, I'm gonna say yeah, prevailing opinion says gender roles are kinda bad. As for myself, I've posted a comment that I hope clears up my own view clearly enou…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:39 AM
1

Oh my god, how the fuck is this "transphobia"? It's not. /u/transsisterradio just has an axe to grind, and has been working on it for a couple of days now (according to the user's posting history). I'm not sure what could be said that wouldn't be "bad" to that person.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:26 AM
9

Many of the responses to this post feel like they're almost threatened by the idea of kids playing with "gender inappropriate" toys. Some of them express the idea that gender roles are somehow sacred, and should be protected and/or enforced in our society; and toys are somehow a MAJOR part of that... First, toys aren't going to be that much of a deciding factor in what roles someone plays when starting a family, these decisions are driven by economics anymore. The issue of toys is all about how …
/r/MensRights13/01/14 03:46 AM
3

Would you be willing to describe what the text was in this post, it's been removed: http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1qgeze/who_are_you_and_what_have_you_done_with_feminism/
/r/MensRights13/01/14 03:34 AM
1

Could you link to the tweet?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:43 AM
5

Often, when I stray into this sub, I tend to find myself confused by the content. Sometimes I'll even say so. Usually, it's something that feels like it should be in a different sub, relating to health issues or sometimes non-gender-specific legal issues. Sometimes it's just a troll-type-post, and I just downvote and leave. But this one feels like it belongs. It's an issue that I've butted heads with folks my entire life. Why does this particular post irk you?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:04 AM
3

This is a fair point, and very few people would disagree. But how do you treat the exceptions to this rule? The girl who picks cars and action figures? The boy who picks dolls? Is it justifiable to treat them poorly for such choices, and why?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:58 AM
6

The FAQ is a good place to start. It's very detailed, and answers all of the questions you posed here. You account is 2 months old... Would you be willing to describe what the text was in this post, it's been removed: http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1qgeze/who_are_you_and_what_have_you_done_with_feminism/
/r/MensRights12/01/14 10:07 PM
9

Radfems Is about equal to and definable as Hitler At least, in many of the contexts I've seen it in. It's an insult that makes little real sense anymore, but adds that little bit of emotional weight to an argument when data just doesn't help anymore. The "Hitler" comment is usually used in political talk shows, "Radfems" here, usually. "WE are right because THEY are evil" is a poor measure of how 'right' we actually are. The value of our discussion should not be measured by what the other groups…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:52 PM
0

Cool story, bro... probably even correct. Actually, yes, it's accurate. No, you may not cut off my testicles, I like them. Is someone citing this study as a justification for males being involuntarily castrated? No? Then it's in the wrong place. This isn't a health sub.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:40 PM
3

Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:57 PM
5

First of a horses are symbols of a masculinity. Why is this a problem? Why would it be okay for a girl to play with ponies if they're symbols of masculinity? Wait, don't answer those... this is getting exhausting. My concern would be my boy believing in the unicorn concept. That is a problem for me. Okay, THIS is the most WTF-worthy thing I've seen all day. If your kid, having lived in a modern, developed-world setting, believes in unicorns, there's problems WAY above, beyond, and sideways of to…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:53 PM
15

Gender roles (on most topics, not just toys), are part of the "bigger" issues you described. A kid going through school being bullied and harassed is going to be more likely to succumb to self-harm of some kind. It doesn't matter WHY they're being harassed, and I've seen folks get vicious over choices of entertainment. This is shit that radfems bitch about. This is all too similar to invoking hitler.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:27 PM
11

Not the most intelligent question. Being raped (being forced to have sex) is not an indicator of the victim's sexual preferences.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:13 PM
5

The question was how would respond to a kids toy. The questions were meant to be rhetorical, in response to /u/Tebbo wondering about the relevance of the graphic the OP posted. The graphic is intended to get viewers to think about "boys' vs girls' toys," aiming to bring questions to why we even make these categories. Ultimately, the goal is to convince folks to be less judgmental about the subject. Your response is 180 degrees from the appropriate one. Exactly opposite of any goal of "happy." Yo…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:05 PM
1

Every somewhat popular movie ends up being twisted to fit everyone's special brand of world view. For myself, walking away from the theater, my main thought was "way too much music, though couple of good songs. Really awesome, visually." I suppose if I wanted to think about it, there's 'lessons' to be taken from the story. The facebook post describes only one. I wish my daughter was old enough so I could sit and talk in a deeper way about it with someone who saw the movie. :P I don't think there…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:36 PM
1

I didn't think The Princess Bride was a disney movie, though. :/
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:28 PM
8

If he made a good case, then i'd buy it. But would you listen to what he presented? It feels like you've got a pretty clear internal bias of gender-appropriate entertainment for children already, and rare is the person who sits and listens to a child talk about... things... That said, what would a "good case" for an MLP figure be if he didn't have a sister? Would "I like the animation, writing, and voice acting of the show" work? Since you've got such misgivings, it should be safe to say you've …
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:20 PM
26

How do you respond to a boy who wants the latest My Little Pony figurine? How do you respond to a girl who wants a brand new GI Joe action figure?
/r/MensRights12/01/14 05:01 PM
1

I just saw the trailer. Balls crawled into my body and dragged my penis along for the ride.... I never got married, but the scariest moment of my life was in the courthouse just a few miles away.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:08 AM
6

This is actually spot-on, much more than simply accurate. It's simple, very much to the point. Excellent work.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:41 PM
1

Happy? Are you excited to be able to learn something new? YAY! If you have netflix, this is a GREAT link to start with! http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/My_Little_Pony_Friendship_Is_Magic/70234440 If not, you can check out /r/mylittlepony. They have a great community over there.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 11:31 PM
1

Other Star Trek series. DS9 and Voyager. I don't think Q appeared in Enterprise (it would have been before the first appearance in TNG...) I could be wrong. :P
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:13 AM
2

In my very best evil-sea-witch voice... Now... SING!!!!
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:11 AM
2

This person isn't worthy of having a discussion with. The redditor was dividing their attention over too many thread-forks to really pay attention to any, and rarely made more than a single complete sentence in response. You've shown a battle to have the last word. Pay no more attention to it. Save yourself the stress.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:10 AM
1

John de Lancie voiced Discord. Y'know, the guy that played "Q" in the Star Trek TNG and other series?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:56 AM
1

Uh... yup. Nope. That, and the spot where he tears into the "Cutie Mark Crusaders" for running those mean stories about Apple Jack just about round out Big Mac's presence in the show. He's cool and all, but he doesn't balance out the mares and fillies at all.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 12:46 AM
7

You're angry. Not sure who you're angry at, but I'm assuming the owner of the sign to be it. You're wrong to be angry. The sign, the explicitly declared welcome to fathers, is a very good thing. The society we live in (at least the one I live in...), adheres to an implied irrelevance of fathers. Most restrooms omit changing tables in the men's room, the occasional "where's your mommy?" when I'm actually talking to my kid. Stuff like that. Like it or not, the absence of "DADS WELCOME" can imply t…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:56 AM
2

50% knowing when not to. Thank you for including this point.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:02 PM
2

You're not making a great case against context for words used... Here's a fun song. http://youtu.be/f0IVuGK7sAw It's not harmless to simply assume troll posts are real. They need to be read more carefully, taken with a grain of salt, and stepped back from and looked at with a critical eye before responding. This is good advice, but I'd already done it before making any responses anywhere. Here's what I found: The poster of the story is on a year-old account. While I only went back a couple of mo…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:29 PM
9

I'll admit to being a bit skeptical whenever I see stories this OP is talking about on /r/MensRights. There's lots of folks that just fail to want to discuss things. I tend to take a quick glance at certain posting histories to see if something feels off. The poster of the story is on a year-old account. While I only went back a couple of months, I didn't find anything that felt like random-rage. So, I felt it was a legit post, and responded accordingly. The one and only bit of evidence provided…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:41 PM
5

The context of the 'neckbeard' comment you pointed out doesn't seem terribly inappropriate. It was in response to a comment that was far more out of line... The question "was this really a 'rape'" is worth asking, and should be asked in the type of scenarios the OP described. You're correct in noting that drunk sex != rape. The concerns regarding additional drugs being introduced should be addressed. Aside from that, he should still get a restraining order in place, even if drugs weren't a facto…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:16 PM
42

How long ago was this? Number of hours? Earlier is better tox screens. If you want him to treat this as an assault, this needs to be done. Call the police for advice on how to proceed beyond that. Talk to your friend. Listen to him. Tell him it wasn't his fault and he did nothing wrong. Try to get him to go to the police. At the very least, he should file for whatever civil protections he can get. Locally, they call it "protection from stalking" and "protection from abuse" orders. More generical…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 12:01 AM
3

As I write this, the petition is closed with 48 signatures. Can't say if it's an action by Change.org or by the person starting the petition. I'd've been interested to see how much support it would have gotten. Sizing up the opposition, as it were... I'll see things like this every once in a while, even from folks that I have some respect for. Generally, they stop posting crap like this to facebook when I ask them about it. Well, that one chick called me a misogynist and blocked me. o.o
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:47 PM
0

Interesting... Religion makes everything complicated.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:39 PM
7

.... I don't care about this... I mean, it IS a men's rights issue. Depending on who's in the ads, it's a potential for every demographic. I just can't get behind it. Really, it's imagination vs. reality. For both genders, for everyone consuming media, we should grasp the difference and teach our children to grasp the difference.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:23 PM
1

I hate it when issues like this come up.... folks argue more on semantics than issues... moron posters put up sensationally misleading titles to posts, then demand to be taken seriously... What does this have to do with men's rights? It's a boy. Perpetrator was a woman. That's is. There's no mention of legal discrimination in the article. Hell, depending on the parent's status (married, divorced, that sort of thing) this scenario might even be called a win. Y'know, someone DIDN'T get a pass just…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:15 PM
1

It is a message. The message being: Islam > Feminism. If someone was to make the cut you asked for, people would seek to learn more about the person saying it, and (like me) become discomfited by the fact that some twit is offering Islam as the best, if not ONLY, choice other than Feminism. The messenger making the points is important. This woman's face, when you know about her, is just the wrong one to have 'debunking' feminism. It'd be like having Men's Rights being explained by Hitler.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:19 AM
3

NO! Take an entire message, or none of it.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:45 AM
-1

Fuck this shit. It's less than worthless, and I mean FAR less, to bring religious philosophy into any discussion regarding rights of groups or individuals. Religion, particularly when it's the dominant political force, exist to facilitate easy control of a population, and little more. Watching the video now... Okay, she made a lot of good points. Standard "critique of feminism" points, but cool nonetheless. However... she really should have rested her case after making those points. Her commenta…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:43 AM
3

I could argue about gender roles in prehistory, but why does this matter in a modern context? The introduction and sophistication of agriculture changed things in fundamental and massive ways. The fact that Ogg and Thag went hunting while Kis and Sal picked berries isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 12:23 AM
4

/r/ShitCosmoSays
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:17 PM
5

So.. what's the context for this image? It's funny and all...
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:08 AM
-9

Oh, geeze, now I have to look up the video. I mean, would've been nice for you to link the video. Why do you hate me? Was it something I did? Did I not hold you and cuddle you enough?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:06 AM
8

The message is important. The situation described should be taken as a warning to people who are considering traveling abroad. Finding solutions to such problems is complicated business. There's problems with the messengers. I don't have much of a problem with the shock'n'awe "look at my boobs while I scream" method, it can take somewhat drastic efforts to bring notice to a topic. I do have a problem with FEMEN's apparent willingness and pride in starting and participating in violent protests. E…
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:25 PM
1

Oops. That point was in a brance of the thread that had been hidden do to downvotes. :P
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:59 PM
5

Holy shit I feel terrible now. I am disgusted with my mutilated penis. Don't be. Recognizing that something bad was done to you can be a traumatizing thing. But it doesn't mean that you're broken.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:56 PM
5

As a religious thing its different No it isn't. That statement is complete bullshit. If an action has no justification beyond 'god said so' then it has no justification. That statement could be applied to anything.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:51 PM
6

There seems to be a lot of silver on this particular grayish cloud. Pretty much every comment by /u/JHCrees is being downvoted into oblivion. The girl's a nutcase. The community recognizes it. edit: fixed a word
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:28 PM
11

What's the context for this?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:12 PM
1

This can't be right... Whenever Cosmo talks about men, all about how all guys crave having their junk covered in various kinds of confectionery just before having the girl eat it. That, or how saying 'have a good day' to a passing stranger means 'how'd the hot dicking go for you last night?' It's pretty awesome to see something different.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:26 PM
9

OP's account is only 9 hours old... Forgive my skepticism, but the shallow pool of history on the account added to the horror of the story makes this hard to believe. The story seems almost tailor-made to create a certain scene, and garner damning remarks. Anyway...Assuming your story here is true... I am going to be creamed for this, but I deserve it. Everyone has fucked up past issues. How you deal with it going forward is the important thing. I think most of the hate you'll get on this post i…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:44 PM
4

Not sure where homosexual rights fit into a critique of the article you posted to. It's kind of an odd tangent to go on, and distracting from any specific point. I think she just had to find 'something' to write before the deadline. It's not a terribly exciting article. I could sit and come up with a few articles about the topic that championed a few different positions. Y'know, "here's why you WOULD get married," "here's why I WOULDN'T get married..." The biggest problem I have with the article…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:25 PM
2

You made an interesting argument, well thought out. But also not terribly new, the pro-life/anti-abortion crowd has been saying the same thing since... forever. No content against women's bodily autonomy and integrity is permitted. Your statement wasn't made described as invalid, just not permitted on their board. Meaning, no debate on abortion rights can be had there. On the one hand, I can see where they're coming from. There's few reasonable pro-life arguments, especially when other factors a…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:50 PM
1

So, rather than making even the slightest attempt at the most basic of rational responses, you decide to jump on the ad hominem thing again. You're not helping with this.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:33 PM
1

A white knight, fucking brain dead troll. This is the first time I've ever been called a white knight. Interesting morning. You know damn well that no publication would do this story with the genders reversed. Cosmo probably would. Don't be an asshole. Don't be stupid. Anyway.... Don't be stupid. When someone does stupid things, that reflects poorly on the community at large, and adds things to the list of topics that need to be explained before getting down to real issues. Grasping at straws, f…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:56 PM
0

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that, I might be okay with my girlfriend waking me up by fondling spots. Honestly, I've never had complaints from girlfriends that I'd fondled in similar ways. So, if she's okay with it, of course the reverse is fine. Look, don't be stupid. Grasping at straws to have something to rage at helps no one.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:37 AM
1

I'm sure most people support women's equality. The definition of 'equality' is iffy, though.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:23 AM
3

You're easily impressed. The same argument, which is quite sleepy by this point, that is repeated during any argument that critiques some of the less savory of feminist folks. Basically, it's just another iteration of: "Feminism is equality! If you're against feminism, you're against equality!"
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:20 AM
8

Of course there is. There's nothing new about the practice of combing over a data set, and presenting just the data points that coincide with a predetermined ideology. The account in question is only a few months old. As I write this, it only has 25 tweets. None of those actually link to the relevant topics on reddit, though. Odd thing is, some of the tweets are actually good points. Of course, a lot of women don't think women can commit rape. This quote is actually correct for the most part. Th…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:33 AM
4

Well damn... I was reading over your post for the sixth time trying to figure out what you were trying to say. It's worth a few giggles.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:10 AM
3

I hate videos like this. It was uploaded to YouTube back in september of '09. And there is no context. No, I'm serious, this video is lacking in context. There's two possible conclusions that could be drawn from this. The guy's actually being abused in this setting. It's not likely, because he's not cowering, backing off, or anything like that. It's some sick fetish thing. If there's more information to go with this video, someone present it... otherwise it's a waste of time.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:03 AM
3

I was tired when I wrote that. Thanks for keeping me on the straight and narrow in regards to writing.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:50 PM
13

Honestly, I don't believe doing so would have any value. Sending a link or messaging him via twitter would be an attempt to change his mind on a subject. Sessler dragged in the micro-rant about /r/MensRights the same way someone pours concrete on toast. I mean, he went from jerks being jerks in online games to "/r/MensRights is deep-level evil" with no content in between. The lack of any real segue, along with the viciously self-righteous attitude, suggests a malformed opinion that he'll protect…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:49 PM
6

Few downvotes are done for objectively rational reasons. I wasn't terribly wide awake when I wrote that, so there might be grammar and/or spelling errors, which could prompt some people to be upset. I imagine that there's folks that just troll the sub, downvoting everything regardless of content. Sessler's a celebrity of sorts. He has a fan base of sorts. I've suggested that he might be wrong on an issue. People taking exception to that would downvote it. So, honestly, I'm not terribly surprised…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 02:37 PM
1

Depends on the hair style she's wanting. Does she want a typically-male hair style? If so, then yes, it's discriminatory. If she goes in with the intention of getting a 'big-actress-glamour' style, then no, it's not.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:31 AM
1

Comment section of the article notwithstanding (never judge a publication by the comment section), the fact that they didn't use the word "rape" or phrase "statutory rape" is just piss-poor journalism. California has an age of consent of 18. According to the law, if the teacher had sex with him, then she's a rapist.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:27 AM
1

Non-issue. If they fail to use the word "alleged" then they've failed at their job. They've failed in other ways.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:26 AM
1

This isn't specifically a men's rights issue, nothing to suggest that the law is inherently unbalanced for either gender. There's potential for the law being unevenly enforced, of course, but there's nothing in the article pointing to that. Pretty much everything suggesting a gender bias is assumed or made up by the OP. There IS the issue regarding sexual behavior of teenagers. One CAN make the argument that laws in that area basically ignore reality. But that doesn't make it a men's right's iss…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:17 AM
1

I'm not from Australia, so I'm lacking a bit of context. Even the maximum sentance, 6 years, seems woefully short for this kind of thing. So, couple of questions: Is running a brothel typically legal where this happend? What would be the typical punishment for raping a 12-year-old in the same jurisdiction?
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:02 AM
1

I'm... gonna go ahead and downvote this link... A coupla points to make: It's not a rinkydink website, like someone's personal blog. Commentary can explode pretty quick on some sites. Psychos tend to troll comment sections of all websites, too. That said, I couldn't find the shocking comments you alluded to. The article was actually pretty well done. Advice that I'd give anyone. Probably use fewer words, though.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:51 AM
1

This is... kind of a waste of time... It's posted in /r/wtf. It's SUPPOSED to be shocking. You're not supposed to agree with it, you're supposed to be shocked and maybe disgusted with it. If something's in /r/wtf, THE LINK IS NOT OKAY. As a thought experiment, reversing the genders would make a shocking and disgusting image. Much like the other one. Waste of time.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:37 AM
1

Let's say she has the kid. you're responsible for it. Daddy whether you wanted to be or not. Consider had screwed over you could be in family court if you did nothing. Essentially, zero contact with the child, along with a fat check sent to the mother every day. If you are NOT okay with that scenario, get a lawyer immediately.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:26 AM
0

I've seen this story a dozen times in almost as many places. Interesting story. Wrong sub for it, though.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:23 AM
1

Answering your questions: Current Government policies also have directives in place to hold the father accountable for support. Meaning he's not likely to be able to pursue high school and still be able to support a child, similar boat as the girl. In either case, current government policy, at least in the US, couldn't give two shits about young undereducated parents. I'd focus on online learning environments, that could be consumed around working schedules. This is a common suggestion. If the w…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:15 AM
3

This isn't a men's right's issue... If he did, indeed, offer to pay her to have an abortion, then he's a really shitty person for not paying her for it. If she's lying about the situation, then she's a really shitty person for lying about it. There's no indication of any systemic discrimination in the article. It's a waste of time.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:52 AM
1

That's not the reason why pro-life folks want to eliminate that particular exemption. The reasoning is always, ALWAYS, about killing a baby because someone committed a crime. The philosophy that gives rise to pro-life legislation simply isn't complicated enough to consider the incentive for false accusations.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:44 AM
1

Abortion-related regulation is an odd set of rules, none of which rely on any real evidence-based data set. Any time you have loopholes to a regulation, it's going to encourage folks to use it. If abortion is illegal "except in case of 'x'" then you'll find a remarkable uptick in the occurrence of 'x'. Psychological disability, rape, medical problems, all of these things. So, yes, if a woman can get a legal abortion if she got pregnant during a rape, then you'll find more false accusations happe…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:41 AM
75

Mr. Sessler, In the event that you end up looking at this "Men's Right's Reddit Subreddit thing," I'm just going to respond to what you said here. Starting from the timestamp in the video that the OP defined, you were absolutely correct for a bit. There are zero reasons for someone to spout commentary that disparages women, homosexuals or minorities while playing a video game, and it absolutely does negatively affect the experience of everyone who ends up hearing it. And yes, when some dipshit s…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 04:48 AM
2

Even if I wanted to entertain the notion of potentially injuring myself from an unprescribed and self-administered 'alternative' medical procedure, I wouldn't take the advice from some random twit on reddit. There really is damn-near nothing worse than doing what you're doing. For others who might actually take your bullshit seriously.... Don't. Honestly, that's what doctors are for. This is not a medical advice board sub. Leave.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:54 AM
2

When things like this comes across my facebook page, I write a short comment stating why I disagree with it. I explain my concern about the poster having such a vicious and divisive opinion on the subject, and that I'm saddened that we can't be friends anymore.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:50 PM
2

If someone had my kid, I'd do what I could to monitor the situation.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:56 PM
1

There was a subreddit specifically to make fun of the crazy crap in cosmo.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:41 PM
3

unstated - it's men they're targeting Do you have any evidence to support this claim? I mean, I can agree that it's a bit over-the-top, but there's no indication that any one group is being unevenly penalized. From the article, it looks like cameras are just being banned outright. Not cameras owned or operated by group 'x'. This isn't a men's right's issue, at least, not as it's framed in the article.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:47 PM
6

A year ago, I read an article about women being 'forced' to get pregnant by their selfish husbands/boyfriends. That article was no more rational or reasoned than this one.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:18 PM
2

Context is needed. What happened after this? Abuse is going to happen from time to time. It'd be nice if it didn't, but that's the world we live in. How such events are responded to is the important part. The important part is how such events are responded to. If someone says "it's okay because it was boys!" then it's a men's rights issue. As of right now, I see a general consensus of people wanting to drag her out and kick the shit out of her, and no people trying to defend her actions. It's a …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:32 PM
3

As for qgyh2's advertisement, he has been in contact with the mods and we have discussed it. He didn't mean to offend, but to promote a book he liked (and possibly earn some money through his Amazon affiliation). In fact he complimented our work. He should still kill this particular ad. Without your post, no one has any context on the sponsored post. My first thought, and apparently others as well, was some jerk was trying to stir the pot up a bit. Again. Most people fail at the requirement to s…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:05 PM
4

I... dunno what to say... lemme catch my breath. Laughing too hard...
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:49 PM
2

This can't be real, it has to be satire of some kind. Can someone cite an origin of this photo? A link somewhere that tells of where it came from?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:05 PM
7

Is men's rights and gender equality exclusive to just libertarian thought? Can men's rights advocates also be socialists? Can socialists also be bigots? No. Yes. Yes. Men's rights is an issue. Like abortion or gun control. Libertarians, Democrats, and Republicans have philosophies that they try to apply to a variety of issues. The philosophies have to generate an opinion on damn near ever issue, because damn near everything is an issue that government is going to have an opinion. Issues like abo…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 02:18 PM
4

I've worked in seven different businesses that had restrooms open to the public. In all cases, the women's restroom was almost always in worse condition at the end of the day.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:57 AM
2

Reddit's an odd place, there's all kinds, and LOTS of every kind. One of the strengths of Reddit is the fact that there's always someone who's willing to examine, very closely, topics that might otherwise be given too little thought. Every once in a while, though, you have a story come up that seems very simple. No need to think about it, it's twisted enough that we can just go with the conventional response. Then you see folks actually discussing it, giving it due process, and and that fact fuc…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:29 PM
4

This is a story about a guy being an asshole. One can speculate about his motivations for being an asshole, and that speculation could be interesting, but there's nothing in your story to indicate that there's anything more special than some jerk being an asshole. And yes, the asshole is responsible for being an asshole.... If you're concerned about the asshole's behavior, you should report it to the management of the gym. Even if you were 'in the wrong', it wasn't his place to correct you. This…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 04:47 PM
7

Got a name for her? Or the podcast she's on?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:47 PM
-1

Personally, I like the women to hold the doors open for me. But then I'm usually carrying my daughter on my back because she's tired of walking or some nonsense...
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:56 PM
13

November seems to be consistently low. We should rename every month November.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:11 AM
2

The problem with this story, and others like it, is that it becomes emotional fuel for actions taken in other countries with a less archaic way of approaching human rights. The details are horrifying, but in no way relevant here in the US.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:51 PM
1

Give me the numbers, cite your sources, and I'll have a similar graphic posted tomorrow. I'm running against a deadline tonight, tomorrow's the earliest I'd be able to make it happen.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:00 AM
2

Might be in the minority here, but I have no clue what show you're talking about, or which network you're talking about.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:04 AM
2

Very few people have patience for the kinds of behaviors you've described, and those people are generally considered to be turds. Locking kids outside is an abusive act. I have no idea what you'd have to do to a sick kid to make them apologize for being sick. I am angry, infuriated even, by the image you've painted of this guy with your words. If what you're saying here is true, then it is in the best interest of your children to reduce the influence this guy has as much as possible.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:40 AM
2

Actually seems balanced, kinda. I'm not horrified by what I read in that thread. I suppose if a guy was asking for help after he found that he can't seem to avoid hitting his SO that more folks would be on the "you're a bad guy, and should feel bad" wagon. Fewer folks on the "get help" bus maybe. That might just be my own bias creeping in, though. It's odd to see the "work things out" type thing going on in that thread, though. It's just a fucked up sentiment.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 12:49 AM
1

Honestly, the first I've ever heard of creepshots, or controversy surround it, was an hour or so ago when I looked at this post.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 07:32 PM
6

What was /r/Creepshots? I'm assuming it was tubecrush, only with women as a publicly photographed subjects? <PC speak> Tubecrush is okay because objectifying men is okay. Creepshots is not okay because objectifying women is not okay. </PC speak> In a more practical, 'real world' sense, /r/Creepshots is on reddit. tubecrush.net is not. Reddit can decide, on a whim, to end any subreddit or user account at pretty much any time for any reason. We are all dust in the wind of the storm of reddit. Tube…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:18 PM
2

What can I personally change from my everyday habits, and what socially acceptable things should I be watching for that are degrading to men/infringing on Mens rights? I don't have enough information to accurately answer this one. What are you doing, personally, that infringes on men's rights? To be honest, just the fact that you're asking this question, with apparent expectation of a real answer, will likely do much to keep things fair. Generally, whenever you hear about something noteworthy or…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:43 PM
2

https://www.google.com/search?q=laxative&hl=en&tbo=d&biw=1600&bih=814&source=lnms&sa=X&ei=caHpULnuC-Wi2wW7vYDQDQ&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAA Might be a good place to start for that...
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:08 PM
3

This is a stretch at most. The man died. His wife inherits his stuff. Including his 'stuff.' If he was alive, completely different story. We'd have a pre-dead guy who's reproductive rights was 100% managed by someone other than him. At that point, I'd lose my shit. But he's not alive to care. We could cut the corpse up, use the bones for knife handles and the skin for drum heads, and he wouldn't care because one needs to be alive to care. This is not a men's rights issue. Maybe appropriate for /…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:01 PM
2

Assuming it's an argument being held in a public place, it'd be helpful to have a link so folks could get a more accurate idea of what's going on. For example this probably can get someone to the discussion you're having. Part of the problem you're going to have is the fact that you're going to be the lone guy who isn't actively hating on what you're defending.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:44 PM
2

Do you have a link to that story? I might have read it, but I want to be sure we're on the same link/page or something. It was a poor example of journalism, if I remember correctly. I think there was a follow-up article, after the girl was found to be lying, about how the community should come together to support her family.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:39 PM
4

The comments section ticked me off, too. Reading the article, it seemed as though everything was handled as appropriately as possible. But then you get into the comment section, and it's all joking and giggling.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:12 PM
4

To be fair, just about every legitimate article regarding a crime would say "alleged" until a conviction occurs. There's no real doubt implied about what happened. On the off-topic issue: all I can say is that I hope they don't actually use the semen. I mean, it's just icky...
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:08 PM
9

It's the first time I've ever seen this video. Hard to say if it's staged or not. For myself, the response of the crowd is the messed up bit. "Haha he got shut down" crap.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:45 PM
4

Uh... why? Reasons why it shouldn't piss you off, as a dad: It's fucking hilarious. It demonstrates a father taking an active role in the upbringing of his child. -given the context of this sub, that's a HUGE win. I did mention it was hilarious, right? I gotta know, what's your beef?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:09 PM
1

Advise your friend to be more explicit in the future. As it is now, it looks like a joke. And to inform the police. I think attempted rape still falls within the set of actions one can be arrested for.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 03:32 AM
1

Marry me.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter