MostSomewhere6873 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	This is supposed to be a joke right? This is just a grift catering to delusional middle aged women's fantasies. If any woman actually pulls this off and you can prove she has this book in her possession, you can sue her for extortion and emotional damage as it demonstrates means and premeditation for any action written within. It's like being caught near an explosion with a book on how to make explosives in your home library. Doesn't save you from needing a hell of a lawyer though. Still, it isn't very realistic. And some "rich par…	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 12:57 PM
1	I'm cautiously optimistic about our future. Like which? It's possible i'm missing one, but pre-emptively say: don't get tricked by revisionism. The likes of wikipedia are desperate to make Achilles gay as much as they're desperate to make matriarchies real. A queen is not a matriarchy of course. The closest example is when extremely competitive patriarchies let women be the owners of property. That's sometimes misunderstood as "matriarchy", but it's actually a way to try to make land owners "neutral". The Japanese shogunate did it and qui…	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 05:24 PM
1	I'm cautiously optimistic about our future. What's weird to me is that anyone can even fall for it. Just get one thing: you're living in an adverse environment. So you don't owe anything to people who look down on you, plain and simple. You can do anything to them. It's justified. Like jesus, are people really so eager to be slaves to fat pigs and their silly harpies? Who the hell out there scares you? Most western leaders are bumbling idiots	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 04:17 PM
1	I'm cautiously optimistic about our future. If abundance was the only thing needed for matriarchies, we would have plenty of historical examples. Instead you put a group of women in a forest and they fracture in cliques. Women literally require male presence even to act as a unit, while men do so regardless of female presence.	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 04:15 PM
1	I'm cautiously optimistic about our future. In general one of the western culture's biggest ills has been a search for Utopian systems. Christianity is an example. Communism is another. The "noble savage" belief lasted centuries. Various techno-utopias, basic incomes etc. are still popular ideas. Little known fact: some prominent French Revolution leaders believed that the Chinese Empire was a utopian model to replicate. The whole american obsession with "freedom" is just another such laughable idea! So Bonobos are just another such obses…	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 04:12 PM
1	I'm cautiously optimistic about our future. > I would personally love to create more Boys' only schools, safe spaces, and scholarships if I had the money. That's thinking like a woman. It's just common sense that any functioning society has men in power and women as in good part subordinated. The only outcome of modern societies is simply colonization by one such system, currently the most likely is the Islamic one. Young boys are already getting to choose between being paupers passed on by women and companies alike, to being Islamized. I…	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 04:05 PM
2	I'm cautiously optimistic about our future. As you said, "caring for yourself" is not what we men do. We care about others, and it's time to care about other men, and young kids growing up in this nonsense completely clueless and deluded about awaits them. Camaraderie is what we men are about and it's what armies are made of. It's simple. I consider every man on this sub my ally. I don't even hate women or think women are bad whatsoever or want to hurt them. But this social order is simply mistaken, and whoever enforces it is my (our) ene…	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 04:01 PM
1	I'm cautiously optimistic about our future. [ Removed by Reddit ]	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 03:58 PM