TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MostlyH2O Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by MostlyH2O on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

the group that maintains the journal... [has no] website Regardless, it would be easier to go through what the author does right (the list is very, very short) but let's address your points a little bit: the author doesn't perform any study or experiment This "paper" (and I use the term very loosely) would be more properly categorized as a meta-analysis. For those kinds of studies, a key element of the reproducibility (crucial part of the scientific method) is the inclusion and exclusion criteri…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:36 PM
0

You clearly lack understanding of English, simply reading the abstract refutes what you're saying and you cannot put a coherent sentence together.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 02:55 PM
1

The abstract literally contradicts your post title. We estimated the degree of gender discrimination in Sweden across occupations using a correspondence study design. Our analysis of employer responses to more than 3,200 fictitious job applications across 15 occupations revealed that overall positive employer response rates were higher for women than men by almost 5 percentage points. We found that this gap was driven by employer responses in female-dominated occupations. Male applicants were ab…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 12:05 PM
3

Ah yes, a paper with a single (unaffiliated) author in the prestigious and High-impact New male studies: an international journal No agenda here boss. And look, it's peer reviewed Guys, as a real scientist this is absolute garbage. There are journals out there who will publish anything because there is a shit load of money in publishing. If you've ever published a paper you know that you get multiple emails per week from journals nobody has ever heard of to publish with them because they're the …
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:02 AM
0

OK. Now go watch beauty and the beast again and keep working feverishly on your manifesto.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 04:11 PM
0

Lmao this is one of the dumbest things ever written. Congratulations. You're living in a Disney fantasy movie, except you're just one of the NPCs.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 03:58 PM
-12

OK incel. My wife and I met before we had any money, we still love each other very much and have a happy life, and both have great careers. This is the most pathetic thing I've seen written today. Get a life dude.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 05:07 AM
-1

OP sounds very pleasant to be around and probably has zero issue taking responsibility for their own actions.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 12:10 AM
-18

What a stupid post. Complete ignorance of RoK politics. It's sad you see the world through a single lens of "women bad"
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:20 PM
-1

Paragraph 2 clause 2. Maybe you should read what you type
/r/MensRights01/12/24 02:22 AM
-8

I don't know the detaila it's false Lmao
/r/MensRights30/11/24 04:12 PM
2

This looks like something an 8th grader would make.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter