TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MotherAce Archive

View 0 posts and 245 comments by MotherAce on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

he kinda translates as a child with little pp energy so not sure this is quite the takedown everyone think it is. Isn't growing as massive as this idiot the entire meme about small babies with massive insecurities? Just dress properly, have a job, and don't be a massive dick in general. Women aren't all that complicated unless you frequent Reddit and think shithole is real life.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 07:16 PM
0

Im not even gonna downvote this comment because it's just a (dumb) joke on the basis of the sub's name. Obviously, not every topic is gonna directly be about what should be a legal right for a man, and whats not. And addressing the actual topic. Not sure this is a gendered issue at all. Most examples of this happening I've heard it's the other way around. In the real world and an actual relationship over time, I'd argue this frustration is pretty evenly split.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 11:38 AM
1

I wholeheartedly agree with everything you say here, so I dont think our disagreement lies much in what either of us aims to do. Feel like any disagreement we must have had got lost in translation. [the rest of this is basically indicative of the reason I'm in this sub as mostly personal, and not much "men's issues". I don't live in the US, and alot of that nations ailments aren't as applcable here. My issues are mostly debating how unfairly and poorly men have been treated in the almost 50 year…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:31 PM
1

The only retort I can have is that children shouldn't have children, because the actions of the guy described here are not one of any maturity. Given the choice and ability, I'd care for a whole village, neither of which needs to be my biological blood if I could possibly afford it. Taking care of the next generation is kinda your whole point as you age. The aim is always the leave a place better now than when you first got there. Also, I just bothered to read your actual reponse. I agree with a…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:02 PM
-4

In this situation specifically? Hell yeah. You cannot treat siblings this young differently just because they do not have the same father. Children do not understand why blood relation would make any difference, nor should they. In both of their lives, their father is the only man they've ever known as such. Blood isn't relevant. And quite frankly, why the frick do you? This was a shit example to bring here. How is a 6 year old, whom every memory of men is this singluar dude as her father, gonna…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 10:26 AM
-5

I think a whole lot of confirmation bias makes this question so impossible. If you are a woman, you are gonna experience (both personal, and seen in others) discrimination mostly against your gender, and register it more easily, and the exact opposite is true if you are male. At best, it becomes a discussion of who has it worse, and again, what gender you are most likely informs your answer. I mostly find this question only infuriating if one gender thinks they have it soooo much worse than the …
/r/MensRights10/08/25 06:14 PM
4

Reading about American zoomers and their frankly insanely warped sensibilities about right and wrong is one thing..., all that being said; this post reads like fiction and bait.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 03:25 PM
1

The content of the article aside. Is that page promoting neo-nazism?
/r/MensRights25/02/25 08:38 AM
1

"Taskforce to reduce number of people in prisons expected to launch next week" -There. Not being a sexist piece of shit wasn't difficult at all. Wonder why its so hard for feminists.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 01:22 AM
2

Guilt by association is such a triggering logical fallacy. You always hope that people aren't scouring your post history whenever you try to have a conversation, but dealing with the monolith of left-leaning redditors, you are bound to be experiencing this sooner or later. Then again, here we are, discussing things on Reddit, and hoping for a fair shake. Who are we really fooling, eh? ^ ^
/r/MensRights13/01/25 06:01 PM

oh, sweet summerchild... That's so cute!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:42 PM
3

sometimes caring about being against something, benefits the thing you are opposed to. Feel this is just highlighting some weirdos that won't gain attraction unless you give them some. For the same reason the existence(or threat) of a modern day patriarchy is a nonsense assertion made by feminists, so is any movement to further a matriarchy(or a gynarchy) just the same. It stems from the same pool of feminist pseudo-science. Mass political hierachies are not likely to form straight down the gend…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 03:07 PM
8

to be fair, often people volunteer their preferences both when they aren't really asked, or in company of people not psyched about hearing it. I'm not disagreeing with OP's post it being much worse on men, just adding the caveat that this topic in general is a douche-magnet. Maybe the shaming has more to do with an individual' willingness to TMI in a less than ideal social setting.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:15 PM
98

oh, men are turning against the very hate group that is actively working to dehumanize them? In other news, water is wet! Ever get the sense that whenever any article attempts to argue for men, they are just half-a-step removed from just piling on more misandrist statements? I mean, this article doesn't say it, but I cannot help but feel that the writer rather wanna talk about the hardship of women, and is gritting their teeth having to acknowledge the underlying statistical data of men and thei…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 07:48 PM
-1

your argument is basically, "if an aircrash happens at least once, it's reason enough to never fly". I mean, everyone can elect to not donate to a sperm bank, using any reason they like, but the existence of something highly statistically unlikely, is not good enough reason to warn the public generally against it. Which is what this post is framed as.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 04:47 PM
-2

the judge maybe yes, but the post is framed as a warning to men about avoiding sperm banks on the basis of absolute freak outlying outcomes.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:47 PM
0

Firstly, this is why you don't take dating advice from women. But more importantly, I'm not sure this makes anyone necessarily a hypocrite. It's just lacking self-awareness about the actual reality of how the dating market plays out for the common man. Just the fact some women think they are disadvantaged in any way shape or form out there, is evidence they aren't very aware. Some actually become aware, with predictable outcome
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 02:02 PM
5

This kinda feels like finding roughly 3 instances of this happening in the history of mankind..., and then putting out a public warning about it. If I were a feminist, I'd use junk posts like these to shame this subreddit for being reactionary extremists. "Let's find the most outlying of outlying examples to advocate against something that helps thousands of people yearly just in the off-chance that lightning strikes at the same place twice."
/r/MensRights01/01/25 01:54 PM

This entire thread and argument is basically a version of how women's preferences are accepted socially, and often championed as "empowering", while mens are scoffed at. Its technically not even a gendered issue. Whenever men or women have unreasonable standards they should be rightfully called out for it, but its never okay to shame the entire gender generally for behaviour that seemingly is entirely dicated by nature or culture. Yet, we turn arguments like these into entirely meaningless gende…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 08:21 AM

think it's more true that they want their cake and to eat it too. Problem is, most women/men aren't compatible living with eachother for an extended time, so while men usually settle for 2 outta 3 desirable traits, and get chewed out for the one trait they complain about not getting; women tends to get a social pass for "wanting it all" as it's suddenly 'empowering' when they aren't settling while stockpiling cats out the wazoo. And to make it relevant for this thread, this becomes more apparent…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 08:02 AM
4

This particular one seems like he was just lonely. He pays for sex to band-aid the pain, but wonder on top if his attempts at self-soothing will wind up turning down the one women at there that might have liked him. Its basically holding out hope for a wild unicorn. That's hardly contradictory, its just human. It only sounds contradictory if you have dog brain, and cannot separate sex from love, or emphatize with how lonely most men feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:54 AM
1

well, I called it "feminist gender theory", or just gender studies originally in my diatribe here. Maybe I mixed the terms once or twice, even failed to stick to the original argument. Anyways, I guess what I mean by "blame" is just my attempt at rationalizing why some people fall for an ideology, and others don't. I think a big part of it is looking for someone or something to blame, that is out of their control. Hence, it's a way to channel all that hurt and pain. If you are hurt by a man, cha…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 07:56 PM
0

yeah. it's just hierarchies. Which happens naturally in any social society with primates. It's that basic. The "patri" is as wrong as "matri" in that word. It's just a simple social mechanic, which isn't willfully controlled by any of the sexes. I guess its why it's pseudo science, and not just regular ol' hogwash, because an attempt was made at legitimizing it. It just failed. The same way eugenics did. Just takes a little while for society at large to realize that maybe these sexists creatures…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 07:36 PM
-4

rename it matriarchy then. Try it on for size. See how it feels Feminist gender theory is mostly bubkus pseudo science. That includes most of their "scholarly" attempt at rebranding plain old man-hating and sexism with less offensive (and often stolen) vernacular. Listening to feminists try to justify their sexist bullshit is very similar to listening to a KKK member base their views of race on eugenics. The problem addressing this in any coherent argument..,; is that there's three types of femi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:48 PM
0

Ouf, well, I think we are done here. I thought you were a real person, but then I saw your latest chat log and how you reply to people in this subreddit. <sigh>
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 01:50 PM
1

yeah, I don't think that is it The first point is a justification. Never really met anyone, of any gender, that date and match due to idealism. At best its confidence. Accomplished men tend to be more confident, and they take more chances. But initially, almost all women look at the status a relationship brings. Either socially, economically, or even strategically sometimes. I do think they, as well as men, lie to themselves alot thou, as to the reason they do what they do. Accomplished men tend…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 06:22 AM
4

In situations like these I'm more entertained than outraged. This video is basically a KKK-member, proudly doubling down on their white cloak and hat-wearing rhetoric, fully oblivious to the ease of comparison to racial discrimination their sexism entails. That being said, this woman is clearly rage-baiting, and is knowingly using these 15 minutes of infamy being outragesly controversial for controversy's sake. Do not heed this call.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 05:06 PM
15

I just find mainstream media hilarious these days, because most of them "know it", but they keep dancing around it. Making an enemy of "all men" cost them the election, and while I think most didn't vote on the basis of what the left feel about men, they sure as hell didn't vote for Kamala based on how the left is treating their demographic. TL;DR: If they didn't vote Trump because they somehow liked him, they definitely voted Trump because he isn't them. And now they are victimblaming men becau…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:39 PM
12

None of these parties, or their candidates serve the common man, so its a moot point. And most of their listicles are empty platitudes to demographics where they believe there's votes to be had. On top of that, outside the 7 or so swing vote states this election your votes doesn't matter anyway. If you live any other place, the outcome of the election in that state is a foregone conclusion. And obviously, none of them care about men's rights. As a man you are inherently worthless unless you brut…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:21 AM
12

think this is more of a movie trope than a real life occurrence. At least these days.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 03:42 AM
1

why does any article with such focus on earnings and money, always come off as written by sociopaths? All I see in every line is this singular focus on perhaps one of the least important aspects of life. Unless your focus is to dominate, manipulate and f**k over other people, money becomes irrelevant past a living wage for a family household
/r/MensRights26/08/24 02:21 PM
1

I actually left that sub willingly today because I was fed up of it being politics's second channel. Half the posts there right now is how interesting anything Kamala Harris is... If I wanted more normie propaganda, I'd turn on the TV.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 09:01 AM
-2

this is a good point to keep in the back of your mind whenever you get into a frustrating arguments online. Chances are either you, or your adversary are holding beliefs in the dicussussion as sacred gospel. For instance, as an atheist I hold religion, or even discussions of spirituality as something niche, even trivial, that holds absolutely no value or bearing on anything worthwhile. This often bleeds through in discussions with a believer, and makes me very aware that my choice of language be…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 09:16 AM
-36

Your screed reads like it's written by a massive bag of dicks who seriously needs to contemplate whatever HE might be the villain of his own narrative. That being said, the reason stated for censoring you isn't necessarily valid. But banning you because what you've written reads like the epitome of what every feminist thinks men in this group are... would be the better reason. You come off as one of those people neighbors of serial killers describe them to be after the fact. Normal by day, kille…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 06:52 PM
2

yeah, its not fun getting downvotes when it's basically down to semantics or phrasing. Particularly if whatever you said was never intended to be controversial. I actually got it right initially, and thought maybe I was interpreting it erroneously, but the username you had made me conclude otherwise Got that one wrong. Sorry about that.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 12:46 PM
3

I think its a phrasing issue which causes the downvotes, because no emotion is less socially accepted from men than anger. (hence my thinking you were trolling) Thou, you might mean since any form of negative emotions from men are frowned upon, it might just be the only one that bubbles to the surface from time to time is anger. Also, in men where quelling your own emotions is common, anger is usually the only manifestation of most emotional reactions, all this due to rigid gender stereotypes. F…
/r/MensRights05/07/24 12:03 PM
5

this is blatantly one of the more untrue troll replies I've seen on the interwebs in a long long time. Good job!
/r/MensRights05/07/24 05:50 AM
1

Reading this exchange I cannot help but feel you are against the narrative presented of an evolutionary reasoning for why men opt to self-sacrifice in lieu of risking harm to their offspring, or even their mate, as being b*s because its presented by someone you perceive as feminist. This feels like bias, as there's broad acceptance for this theory and even the staunchest of women-hating nihilist usually has a notion of the cultural idea of "women and children first!" While you CAN explain it all…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 05:20 PM
1

+1 Not ran into this dude before, but this was my sentiment exactly when I read his question. Nothing he has written since in this thread have dissuaded me from that initial impression
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:41 AM
3

Are you? The pushback you get here is this idiot framing of "marxist feminists" in your posed original question. You are (needlessly) bringing economic class theory into an easily explained question when feminists veiled or overt misandry explains their empathy gap for mens issues. Or just brainwashed ignorance. Which is why I told you to go take this question to them instead, because otherwise this entire discussion turns into a rally for ideologues like you, who thinks every opinion must be sh…
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:36 AM
-2

You should ask a "marxist feminist" that, instead of this sub. Who even describes themselves as marxist feminists, unless they are perpetually online and a femcel in the first place? Society at large doesn't "allow" men to discuss loneliness without blaming them somehow for it. Might be some feminist theory that aims to explain this using a thin veil of misandry and pseudo science, hence why you should ask them. They're bound to have produced a social science paper on this question by now. If I'…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:57 PM
16

Sometimes its fine to just repost her entire comment to her, just swapping out "men" with "jews". Hopefully meinkampf'ing their sexism still holds some value, thou these days nazis and feminists might as well be the same group when you look at US college campuses.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 09:04 PM
3

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/earl-silverman-who-ran-mens-safe-house-dies-in-apparent-suicide
/r/MensRights24/05/24 02:01 AM
9

I've lost faith too. Been doing this for too long. I very much understand how Earl Silverman must have felt. You just get worn down. There's so much force behind the feminist narrative, and it feels like being trapped in an avalanche of bizzaro reality talking points when you are dumb enough to engage with one of them. It's genuinely better to turn off the internet, and sit awhile in the sun.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 02:34 PM
1

If I were 17, and someone argued that I was a victim in a situation identical to this, I'd be furious about the infantilization of myself by others. "Stop trying to make me a victim of an imagined crime just because you are a conservative asshole!" would be my exact thinking. Guess I just don't agree that 17 years of age should be anyone's defintion of a minor. I can understand that there's a difference in maturity when it comes to questions surrounding ones own bodily autonomy for some teenager…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:39 PM
1

Quote from my original post; ...Only place where this kind of abhorrent disproportionate response to a minor infraction would warrant a 13 year sentence. Seems like I recognized it. From a legal standpoint, this is at best a fine, maybe some community service. Definitely a waste of the courts time. And as a pointed out, this woman ruined her life and her family spectacularly. Seems like punishment was dealt by life itself. 13 years is the most atrocious of pile-ons.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 02:23 PM
1

yeah. I wouldn't be opposed to the teacher getting fired from her job from this, but involving the courts in this is just ...nonsensical. They should have much more pressing matters to attend to. Think my main hangup in all of this is Americans not recognizing how much of their moral guidance in whats right and wrong is derived from the same book that extremists use to justify all sorts of heinous crimes against humanity. Clearly, that book is no good as a guidance for anything. Morale panics an…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 02:01 PM
-1

Involving the courtsystem? Not at 17. Nor do I think the court should be involved in moral panics about actions which involve individuals above the age of consent. For that reason I'm not even sure you could argue someone is being groomed unless they are below that age. What I'm basically arguing here is that USA is a backwards moralistic country living in the religious dark ages when it comes to treating normally developed 17yr olds as immature children in cases such as this.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 01:49 PM
-5

In Norway where I live, and most western nations, and I suspect even in most US States, a 17yr old is not a minor when it comes to having autonomy concerning their own sexual choices. He wasn't forced. This was consentual... soo, why are the courts involved? At best, getting booted by the school for making dumb decision with a student is a punishment I can surmise would be proportional for this teacher. If nothing else, to appease the brainwashed religious or conservative Karens of the community…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:53 AM
-2

The gender of the older party here is irrelevant for my opinion about the draconian nature of this punishment, so I assume no. If you spotted any double standards in my previous post, I welcome you to point them out for me.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:11 AM
-14

The headline gets this right by having it say "USA" in big letters upfront. Only place where this kind of abhorrent disproportionate response to a minor infraction would warrant a 13 year sentence. Isn't the fact that she nuked her own family, lost her job, and became a social pariah punishment enough? fuck sake, sometimes this subreddit is pathetic. You guys bitch when someone isn't punished enough for something way worse than this while being female, but when the book is thrown at them, you st…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:42 PM
6

"science is the new religion of the left"? You wanna clarify that? Because all I see is imagined social pseudo-science and religious cult-like behaviour. Never seen a lefty marching down the streets holding a "hooray for the scientific method!"-banner.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 12:37 AM
18

Because to them the issues of gender is a field of war, and no combatant who helps the enemy "lives" to tell the tale. Just look at the numerous examples of former notable feminists who stepped out of line to actually look at men's issues, and how they all got ex-communicated. I genuinely do not think there exists a single example of a former feminists who haven't been shunned or branded. It's a gender supremacy cult. Pure and simple.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 01:44 PM
9

Cannot be using just one YT creator to make this assertion unless there are similar channels having a dataset very similar to this. The release schedule is also not predictable during a few months, which I suspect can be a factor too as that is widely reported in having an effect on the algorithm recommending your videos. Particularly to users who doesn't have the channel subscribed or recently liked.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:19 AM
2

I mean, It's not like a can voice a dissenting opinion in any sub outside of this, because the common redditor practice at this point is check your post history, and spotting this one in particular, will get you an auto-dismissal. By posting here, or any sub dissenting the orthodoxy, you are officially a reddit leper. Tribalism is such an ugly trait in humanity. (oh, if you are one of those people checking my post history because I said something you disagree with in a different sub than this...…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 05:56 PM
-4

Yes. Yeezes christ. Did everyone turn into a raging autist all of a sudden. If there's an endless line, and the other gender' stall is unoccupied because the audience is overwhelmingly one gender, then to save time you go use whatever bathroom available. This issue is so America-specific it gives me the creeps. How much do you yankee retards spend staring at other people genitals in public bathrooms for this to even be an issue? Use a god damn stall, and stop being a whiny bitch.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 05:25 AM
-20

first off, wtf are you doin' at a Taylor Swift concert? Second, and most importantly, if the audience is 99% female and they are there in droves, logistics dictate that some leeway is offered. Try not to get your panties in a bunch about everything all the time, maybe.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:48 AM
4

...the irony of this question when you look at the post history of OP.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 06:00 PM
8

For me this speaks to the bigger issue with feminism as an ideology. Once your intial goals of equality is met, the movement becomes a push for gender supremacy. "You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain" Feminism basically reached most of their goals in the 70s and 80s in the western hemisphere, now they're brainwashing young girls to expect special treatment or think minor grievances is massive issues, just so they can keep the train going. If you are bo…
/r/MensRights16/12/23 09:33 AM
2

I wouldn't mention it at all. Just push back whenever you run into the obviously flawed talking points of modern day feminism. I'd argue MRA is as much of an "ideology" in the same sense that atheism is(n't). As in, it's not about stating a set of core beliefs, but pointing out the obvious errors of flawed notions from others. And as several others pointed out. Don't use the phrase "MRA" or even mens rights. Technically, talking about injustice towards men is just human decency and common sense.…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:28 AM
3

so, eh, by the snippets of information given about this, well, lets use the word female since it's triggering; I will wager there's a good chance she needs therapy, and an equal chance she suffers from some diagnosis found in the DSM-5. What she is trying to control, what is triggering her, and how she responds to it, sounds anything but healthy. Particularly for those closest to her. Do not underestimate the toll it will be living with someone that has so many clear and obvious warning signs re…
/r/MensRights02/12/23 01:27 PM
3

well, it might turn out to be ridiculous ofc. Much like my example of hippies, once we are far enough removed from the current culture in time, we might be able to look back and spot whether or not "wokeness" or calling people woke was just a stupid fad, or something that actually describes the time. In my opionion, I think we're falling down on it being a genuinely cultural phenomenon. I mean "Karen" is probably a fad term for a particular type of pearl clutching busy body. But I think "wokenes…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:07 AM
4

but that is exactly what words does. Or language. It's shorthand for expressions or sentiments. So if a 4 letter word summarizes a ton of things that are applicable, then it's the most apt word to use. Also, woke tends to entail peole who have a slight problem with the defintions of words. Either in failing to understand what terms describe them, or failing to understand that a slew of other -ist and -phobe-words doesn't necessarily describe the people who disagree with them. I think the downvot…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 05:56 AM
7

woke works as shorthand for authoritarian, awful, humorless, intolerant, bigoted, stuck-up cunts. Makes the term "woke" quite useful. Looking at the video, I feel woke pretty neatly summarized the type of untermensch featured in it.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 05:29 AM
2

oh for sure. I guess that is the takeaway here. A conversation here and there is really helpful for men, but if you can get into the routine of doing something with your body regularly it's just as good as any therapy session. Not always sure this is true for women. Or at least the benefits seems weighted in the opposite direction. Personally, I did MMA for a few years, and the community, focus and experience from that was tenfold what 20 years of therapy gave me.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:44 PM
2

I think the better way of putting it isn't that men need therapy as women did. More that they at least need to tell some other person whats going on in their head. Just a release is cathartic. But I feel the psychiatric profession in many way fails in conveying a good avenue for men to work out their problems. As again, solutions is all about doing outside of the therapists office, than any mental gymnastics done within. But yeah, my experience with men are that they are quite often very interes…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:58 PM
2

regarding therapy I'll offer a "hot take"(and yeah, completely subjective so regard this as just someone an idiot (probably) alot older than you once said;) Therapy is for women. Hear me out. Ofcourse there are exceptions, and everyone if they struggle to understand how they think and react will benefit from hashing this out in this setting. But it will not fix you, nor will it help outside of being a clarifying agent. I went to a myriad of them over more than 20 years, and outside of making it …
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:11 PM
9

Not even remotely enough information offered that would warrant anything but the lightest of advice. Outside of things already mentioned by others, -whatever this friend of yours meant to you, I wager she came to the same conclusion as you did. (albeit, maybe through a different path) It seems that you both look at life from such different perspectives that you's never fully mesh, and as soon as any random excuse was given she took the opportunity to make a parting decision. Chances are you are …
/r/MensRights12/11/23 08:01 AM
16

This is written like a KKK-member trying to understand the plight of black society.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 09:03 AM
5

...when an article is written in a language so deeply removed from reality and lived experience that you wonder if you live in a fever dream? Wtf was that? And the initial conceit of this expo sounded to me like it was highly illegal? ...I don't even...
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:48 AM
1

Ever noticed that when people defer to ad hominems, it's always reflective of the very thing they themselves are guilty of?
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:43 AM
2

well, come to think of it, you could always live up in the woods, and mail bombs to universities to avenge their fucked up experiments on you. Thats one sure way for a dude to be remembered. Come to think of it. It's one of very few examples of lone men that are remembered. Mass murderers and psychos. And almost without exception, they were all lonely too. I don't know what you have against women, but they are in fact the only way to get a family of you own. And if you somehow manage to feel ful…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 09:11 PM
1

this is somehow the message of "Barbie". Just FYI. Not sure I agree. The thing is, we're gynocentric, hence society revolves around women as they are usually the only avenue of getting an offspring. For many people this become the reason for their life, and brings immense meaning. So yeah, telling people you don't need a partner is akin to telling a spinster she'll be happy with some cats and yarn. And we both know thats one of those meaningless tripe crap we tell lonely women. It's not okay whe…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 03:59 PM
1

Always remember that you won't win this argument in real time using any of the knowledge gained here.(or at least thats super-rare) As with any flawed ideology, convincing people might take years, and it's a process they usually wind up doing on their own. Doubt slowly perculating and surfacing in their mind. Just dump the counter-arguments, point out the hypocrisy, and walk away. You cannot do more. It's the same process used on religious people. When you've been thought one thing in your upbri…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 06:26 PM
22

The entire world is gynocentric. It's probably one of those things that are rooted in our genetic psychology. (survival of the species) Obviously sprinkled with alot of cultural and historic indoctrination too. But yeah, there shouldn't be wars is basically what you are saying.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 07:12 AM
5

personally, I think it took him a long time to realize the severity of the situation he was in. Looking at the roles he always played, I think he was just playing up the stereotype, thinking he could "lean into it" as a joke. I mean, if you believe you are innocent(and he might have been), then often you will laugh at the absurdity of it, and hence the somewhat goofy videos he made turning out creepy and misguided to the public eye.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 08:42 AM
115

here's my bias for this; Prior, for years before metoo, it was joked about in parties, even included in some Hollywood media that being "groped" by Kevin Spacey at his basement was something of an initiation to the inner club. So there's that. But it doesn't really mean he ever did anything that warrants getting dragged through a court or have his career effectively ruined(doubt he'll ever come back in time to have any meaningful career after this) There's little evidence he ever violently or fo…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 07:56 PM
8

If you are a nazi, you probably see something good in nazism. I presume its the same for a feminist looking at feminism. It's the best way to explain any hate ideology. I just assume that the brainwashed do not believe they are hateful, as the thing they despise are considered an untermensch.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 07:12 AM
8

As an atheist I rarely if every engage much with theists. Simply because of the axiom that any stance you've reached on the basis of faith alone, cannot be unreasoned using logic as it was never the basis of the belief. Feminism is no different. There's very little factual basis for its tenents, hence most feminist arrive at their conclusion on the basis of some perceived slight towards their gender. Genuine or not. As such, you cannot actually reason with them, because if reasonable they wouldn…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 09:37 AM
14

I always wondered if these types of stories are even true. Who willingly throws themselves out for the social media wolves, when they are so clearly behaving like the devil incarnate?
/r/MensRights20/06/23 09:51 PM
3

As an European I cannot possibly care less about a 31yr old having sex with a 16yr old, besides the obvious question of "why"? and "Where's the interest in even pursuing it in the first place?" for the lady. The court deemed her intentions to not seem predatory, so I guess the judgment itself makes perfect sense for this individual case. But yeah, the double standards and the hypocrisy if the genders were reversed? That's the irksome part. No way in hell this judge would even entertain the same …
/r/MensRights24/03/23 05:25 PM
2

Not sure why Im doing this, because the place surely doesn't deserve it; but TO BE FAIR; the moderators of feminism actually deleted this low effort cringe post.
/r/PussyPass21/03/23 06:31 AM
1

this is true, but I'm soon 50, and having had a love for film and TV all my life, I've seen most if not almost all of worthwhile content from 80s to the 2010s. These days I'm mostly catching up on really old classics, or hopelessly flipping thru' all the bollocks on the streaming channels. Either I'm tired of film itself, which is possible, or the current decade/zeitgeist is the worst its ever been. I'm leaning towards the latter.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 01:21 PM
2

This movie is somehow gonna be worse than the previous, isn't it? <sigh> Starting to realize by the time the zeitgeist gonna stop hating on masculinity(if ever), I'd be long dead, so won't ever experience that again. No wonder I don't watch much movies anymore.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 12:19 PM
15

a "buck 50"? Whats that in rest-of-the world-terms? 150 pounds, so 64kg? Depending on build, you can easily run down an unaware man carrying that. Then again, the fact that you even tackle someone to the ground kinda speaks to experience in doing something similar quite often. This gal' probably isn't shy about getting physical. A random accident doesn't really scream abuse, but things like this happening more than once is a red flag.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 03:56 PM
2

Yes. The answer is yes. And every other opinion and and interest they don't like.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 11:29 AM
11

this is just a good example of how non-comparable it is. Your cherry-picked example has mostly phrasing issues, more than any legit sexist intention. I'd be hard pressed to register this as problematic compared to the "Kill all men", "all men must die", "castrate, shun and remove"-rhetoric you find plentiful in feminist spheres. Apples and oranges, indeed. One movement openly accepts vile, sexist and gender supremacy statements in their forums, while the other just sigh and mildly complain about…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 12:02 PM
-1

not as much men's right, as a human rights issue in general. US needs to get their prison and incarceration system revolutionized. Maybe realize that the medieval "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth"-concept isn't the point, but to re-educate and integrate its vast majority of inmates to be functioning members of society. 99% of people locked up aren't beyond help, and an alarming rate of them probably not even guilty in the first place. Just victims, creating more victims. Look to Norway or some…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 09:50 AM
1

Let's take a moment to appreciate it's woman-centric "Evie Magazine" who does this write-up. Norah Vincent was truly a self-sacrificing hero for what she did, but it cost dearly. Rest in Peace, you magnificent martyr.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 09:59 PM
2

this is a scam email thou. Just delete it.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 01:53 AM
2

yeah, she's a real knucklehead.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:25 PM
10

a bit unfair to downvote this contribution, but I agree with the ones commenting on it:--- you are a bit preachy, dogmatic, and set in (expected)roles; for this to even make sense, or be good advice to anyone. Good sex almost always entails the ability to be fluid, communicative and responsible for all partners involved.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:11 AM
10

...don't think this observation is even true. There's activity and attempts at changing things all the time. But the disparity and attention paid to women vs men is so great; that you both doesn't notice what the MRAs attempt, nor does it get any media attention, and if it does; feminists are there to shut it the fuck down..--- immediately. The power disparity in support groups for the sexes are in fact so immense that if feminism is the Sun, we're Pluto.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:08 AM
2

start using Xennial. It helps. People born between 1975-85 often belongs more to this group than the respective traits of either GenX or Millennial. Im '78, and while I never feel anything in common with Millennials, I also feel too young to understand all of the GenX mindset. Xennial works. (it's also a term having had enough articles written about it to be as legit as any other label) I usually say that if you grew up loving Buffy The Vampire Slayer, have some memory of the cold war(maybe Cher…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:04 AM
3

this was the comment I was looking for. While I agree with pretty much everyone that "most" was a bold claim..., I will fully submit that "alot, and surely alot more than most people think, is probably more accurate. Good on you for shifting and modifying your claim and stancea after some debate. I salute you, brother!
/r/MensRights14/09/22 09:01 AM
2

In short, this; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynocentrism Men are indoctrinated by the prevailing common culture and perception, just as much as women. If you aren't particularly interested in a subject, you are more likely to go with the 'default' narrative. Even if it's totally wrong, and against your own interests.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 09:44 AM
1

oh, for sure. But I feel it still applies. Reacting to minor grievances like this, just makes the person that reports it look like a 'pearl-clutcher'. While certainly justified, it's not a worthwhile hill to die on. Look at it like this; if feminists already wind up portraying themselves as moralistic bigots, then it's not a good idea to combat them in any way that makes you look righteous. Because the difference to any outsider looking in whether someone is righteous or moralistic is neglible, …
/r/MensRights29/07/22 06:55 PM
2

to me this falls under the 'comedian' umbrella. If your attempt is clearly to be funny, or in this case, absurd; it doesn't really matter whatever it says. Cancelling shit like this, is no better than someone trying to cancel a stand up comic. Lets not get carried away, and use the tools of the crazies just because there's an obvious double-standard at play.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 06:31 PM
0

moids? male humanoids? Or? From the sound of these 'spectactular' human beings, it feels like even humanoid is too eh, humanizing to be using for us. They couldn't think of a worse one?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 09:25 AM
3

why are you guys reacting to someone with the nick "dickdingo9" like he is any form of an ally? The combative nature of replies, and the general ignorance of how this post and question is formed leads me to believe its purely a troll. Begone.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:14 AM
34

"Slavery is also okay, because that's common practice here' Your logic, if born a few centuries earlier. Or "Think I'll start a nation, where you ritually chop peoples eyelids off. I mean, it's gonna be common practice in a few decades or so, how can it be wrong?" I think the technical term here is "argument from tradition" Not neccessarily fallacious, but it never really struck you as odd that a potentially dangerous cosmetic injury performed on non-consenting babies is something of an barberou…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 04:41 AM
1

I did not say Nazis were woke leftists. I compared the cult mentality of the ideology being able to brainwash seemingly normal people to believe and follow untenable and quite frankly evil ideas.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:41 PM
3

Looking at the degree of brainwashing most of this woke ideology entails, it's actually a gateway into understanding how so many of the german people got under the spell of nazism in the interwar years. If you hear dumb shit repeated often enough, it start to sound reasonable
/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:50 AM
38

"coding error" Never has two words needed quotation marks more. It's like when Jeffrey Epstein "killed himself" in jail all over again.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:53 AM
8

That Vice interview 'hit piece' they did with Jordan Peterson a few years back was hilarious. Everything was about finding snippets and tidbits of out of context clips they could use for their agenda. Ever since, I've not really enjoyed much VICE content. Well, except for watching every now and then and see what hot political mess some of their content is. They are usually only worthwhile when they go far abroad, and explore topics in the far reaches of the world. Hopefully without focus on iden…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 11:40 AM
3

yeah, this probably just means what US thinks socialism is. Or how its perceived there, and its supposed ties to woke culture. But OP argued his government was run by a socialist, so I assumed not US, which is why I was wondering about the anti-socialism bias inherent in his write-up. (Quite frankly, sounds like Canada, Trudeau seems like a weirdo it's easy to dislike) I mean, I live in a social democracy, and by American standards we are basically communists. What our various HR departments hav…
/r/MensRights29/01/22 11:03 AM
13

why is it relevant to mention that your government is now run by the socialist party?
/r/MensRights28/01/22 08:11 PM
3

There's something viscerally upsetting by the brainwashed not recognizing their own affliction, and then doing a 180, turning that very thing on you. Making you out to be the one confused. So glad I've turned my online presence down to a minimum over the years, because I'd be miffed for days if I were the victim of this reddit mod' attempt at 'logic'.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 09:50 AM
13

"Sophie Francis-Cansfield, of Women’s Aid, said: “One woman is murdered by a man every three days in the UK. Priority must be given to ensuring women’s safety.” Quickly doing an estimate on the math in my head, using statistics for England and Wales from 2019/20, there's almost 2 men murdered every day. Seems to me if you are gonna prioritise... I just hate how feminism skews the numbers, and leaves out the fact that they are almost always the more sheltered and prioritised gender by default. Fu…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 05:48 PM
2

Personally I didn't downvote you, no, but seems we're basically capturing the same sentiment, but having very different reactions too it. Probably thru' the lense of being the person we are. I didn't have that experience with adults growing up, or anyone aiming to control more or less anything in my life(almost to a detriment), so I never nurtured much resentment towards much of anything perhaps, nor did I have a rebellious phase. Wasn't really anything in my life to actively rebel against. I ju…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 06:02 PM
2

mostly the 'brainwashed' part. I could be wrong, but I get the sense she's not aware that her sentiments are irrational. And being an atheist, I feel empathy for people with beliefs that are held due to traditions, or through cultural osmosis. That shit seems hard to combat. And I mean, I can't help but feel empathy for people that are wrong, but oblivious to it. It's kinda hard to blame them outright. Poor ideas can pop up from anywhere, not just religion. I could be having them too, and oblivi…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:01 PM
2

yeah, this one I actually just feel sad for. She seems brainwashed into thinking being a tradwife is the be-all, end-all of all she can be, and it's kinda tragic. Often a realization many of us will do, no matter what sex we are, that we're programmed to believe something that doesn't necessarily turn out to be a great choice/solution. But projecting this anger at men, is just another way of misplacing this anger and frustration at a random group that has little to no real blame for this in the …
/r/MensRights20/01/22 09:15 AM
7

As pointed out already, probably one of many compounding factors. One not mentioned so far is the propensity for men to die of minor heart attacks when alone. Since more and more men live alone, they run the risk of dying from more minor heart issues, since there's nobody monitoring them on a regular basis. Women, on average, doesn't run the same risk in the heart department, and will rarely have their heart do hiccups on them while being alone.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 05:14 PM
2

At first I was incredulous to the claim, but after seeing that video. What absolute despicable reaction. Did she even listen to him? Maybe she has some cancer blocking her ear canals? Think she would have accepted that excuse for herself?
/r/MensRights17/01/22 03:26 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Silverman Have anyone mentioned this guy? More or less a hero of men's rights advocacy that fought so hard it eventually killed him. If you google his name, the first result is usually some article mocking him for his involvement in the cause. (and yeah, the literal only reason to mock him was his argument that there's a need for shelters for men) Only a society that has systemic issues, would leave the legacy of a hero to be ridicule and mockery. I mean, what …
/r/MensRights09/01/22 06:59 AM
1

I think we're done here. You are just being a sore loser now. For the record, usually the one brandishing the IQ argument, is the one lacking. I at least know enough about Dunning-Kruger to spell it correctly, too. I'm also tempted to point out that you were the one making outrageous claims and I'm the one holding the skeptics position. It's kinda hard to run afoul the Dunning-Kruger effect when I haven't been the one to claim any special knowledge. Referring you to the legal basis of CIA's exis…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 05:07 PM
1

Hehe. You are not exactly digging up from the hole you are in. For a general life advice; find better sources for your information before you make a fool of yourself airing unfounded theories to others. But I'll bite. Usually, the best way to discern whether something is conspiratorial or not; you need to look at motive vs cost/possibility. If the potential cost of doing something far outweighs the benefits, or it's just plain impossible, then it's probably not true. Also, conspiracy merchants u…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 04:35 PM
1

...not the CIA. That is some Alex Jones level conspiracy shit. I mean, yes, they've probably done propaganda overseas, both historically, and now, but they are in no way linked to the current culture war that is propegated by the popularity of university gender studies and the general brainwashing of youth from some western universities. Technically, CIAs mandate aren't even within US borders. What they do illegally, I cannot speak to, but I sincerely doubt its linked to any of this.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:27 PM
1

Not saying I disagree with your intended message, but there's some superficiality and general anger in there. You don't need to be an 'attractive' dude to be aware of those things, and not sure the whole 'women should be pristine'-argument is even relevant to the topic at hand. How does this relate to how their treated by the law? Unless they are actual whores, the justice system treats all women preferentially compared to men. You are just making a general, "fuck you, feminism!" rant. It's just…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:27 AM
6

true or not, think this comment is one of those that give this subreddit a bad name. Maybe..., dial back the language a few notches?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:04 AM
-1

hehe, this is like going into a christian forum, and asking if everyone have read this cool book called 'The Bible. It's really neat. Ever heard of it?".
/r/MensRights04/01/22 07:32 AM
3

...says the lying piece of shit.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 12:04 PM
4

get REKT. Sorry, I couldn't help myself.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 11:17 AM
1

yeah, I suppose that is true too. I wouldn't believe missonaries and their "education" did the continent much good. It's just crazy to me, that someone would come to the conclusion that something we're all born with, is wished upon from 'God' to be removed. And failing to believe all that, they'd use scientific ignorance to keep justifying it. <sigh>
/r/MensRights03/12/21 08:29 PM
10

vestigial?`wtf, fairly certain I've had good use of my foreskin. Not only is it a protective layer from all other stuff that shouldn't be near the glans, but it's quite fun as a toy during sex too. Not to mention before. And no person in the right mind is bothered by it during sex. I mean, Are you bothered by the protective folder of skin atop the clitoris? Plus, America is the only country in the world where people somehow have been brainwashed into believing removal has medical benefits. The o…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 11:35 PM
2

yeah, it's weird. But also, we live in a clown world. I'm glad I'm not young. Seems like a horrible time to be >40 years old.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:40 PM
9

pretty sure you got assaulted. Like, for real. The actual defintion of assault. If someone else saw it, press charges, and have them witness for you.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:58 PM
6

I remember being a green Reddit user many years ago, and finding TwoX in my subscribed subreddit list, and wonder how it got there. It's how I learned the site has a few general forums, which we all are signed up for when joining it. You'd think a 'default' subreddit would be a lot more wholesome, but it's perhaps the most hateful place I've ever seen. At least back then. Remember commenting, mostly in confusion and disbelief, and getting my ass instantly muted and banned temporarily for arguing…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:22 AM
-1

well, that was a classy read. Gotta say, the worst crime here, is whoever typed up that article, plastering it with all the trashy photos of her they could muster. Not gonna react much to a 24 yr old engaging with a 17yr old, as the only place where that is even a crime;are some places in the puritanical US of A. Unless she has a pattern of behaviour where she regularly goes after younglings, and this 17yr old is on the older side, there's no pedophilia here. Calm the f*** down with this dumbass…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 04:42 AM
12

Can't really do this without women speaking truth to power. And by power, I mean the feminist dogma. Poking holes in their logic as a man does diddly-squat, but having a woman doing the same; at least stand a chance of being heard.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 11:21 PM
2

I'd laugh at it because it's a feminist talking point, and faux social science. There's no legitimate hard data behind the concept, hence it's only a pathetic ideology and any unironic use of the term deserves scorn.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 10:49 PM
4

where? First real awful comment I've seen sorting from the top, was yours.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 10:39 PM
3

haven't been to court at all. The british courtdates was just about slanderous remarks in their shit newspapers. Depp lost, since freedom of press kinda hard obstacle to overcome even thou they called him a 'wifebeater' without much merit. Judge more or less favored with Heard on her testimony alone, and dismissed Depp, and all the witnesses he had on testimony alone. Complete and utter B*S. Then again, it's common knowledge that the British press is awful human pieces of garbage, so it wasn't e…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 10:38 PM
6

Again, not sure thats true. I live in a nation where nobody is circumsised unless immigrants, and there's no 'outcry' of women complaining about their men being unable to hold their load. Quite frankly, I suspect the ratio of people having issues with 'stamina' is exactly the same as any other nation. Whether I hold my skin back, and thrust, or let it behave naturally doesn't make a lick of difference in the 'sensation' for me. Granted, I can do some 'magic tricks' with my foreskin that the woma…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 12:34 PM
4

doubt that last point is true. Thats more of a folksy myth, which has never been researched or proven. Anecdotally, I can tell you that being un-circumcised definitely doesn't make everyone cum fast. Much like being circumcised, definitely doesn't stop some people from cumming fast.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 11:26 AM
5

A good comparison to what is going on here is actually comparing feminism to the KKK-clan. What this guy actually did, was go into KKK-territory, and agree with one of their talking points as a black man. He is obviously gonna get lynched either way, and it goes along way in explaining the mind of someone indoctrinated by feminism. And just like any KKK-member, they obviously think their ideology is scientifically validated and fair.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 06:23 AM
9

ever get the sense when someone addresses men's issues, that they are just larp'ing? Its so rare, that whenever I find someone actually saying something that usually aren't vocal, I think they are either liars, or I don't trust their sincerity. It says something about the state of things.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 11:21 AM
51

I immediately recognized this as a /r/menkampf , but its always shocking how blatant it is, without it being condemned by the public en masse. Sigh.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:41 AM
289

Reading that gave me relationship-PTSD.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 01:00 PM
2

well, something, besides culture or nurture, clearly dictates distinct differences in beheaviour which is not learned, as its clear to anyone with a baby or two, that boys and girls on average do not behave similarly to their environment growing up. Across the board, there's always been gravitation towards certain fields which correlates with gender as the subjects reach professional age, even if systems are set in place to counter-act it, it'll prevail. In nations where gender equality is the g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/21 11:10 PM
1

haha.- not gonna fault you for that. I do too. Here's an updoot! You make a good point.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 09:26 AM
1

the way I see it I'm the one trying to understand the other side, probing at what reasons the feminism sub could possibly ban you. Sure, you don't seem like 'a dick', but with an edgy name, you really gonna blame me for thinking you like edgy humor and stirring shit up? You broke one of their rules, and you got banned. I mean, it's a stupid rule, but it is what it is. Not sure why you would come here and complain about it. It's like someone else pointed out here; a cult is gonna cult. Nothing we…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 09:14 AM
1

...considering your redditname, I'm thinking your whole schtick is to stir shit up. Chances are you'd get banned on any sub, when the whole idea of going there was to cause controversy in the first place. They literally have their own "askfeminists"-sub for questions, and a rule against asking them in feminism. Sure, I agree they are cult-like people, but this entire thread is someone being a dick on internet, knowingly.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:09 PM
15

I do believe you. And to add to this, if more people who call themselves feminists acted and reasoned the same way as you, we wouldnt' even have this political schism between the genders in the first place. But yeah, as many have pointed out, you are most probably an egalitarian. The egalitarian wing of 'feminism' is a dying breed, and are rarely heard from in online circles. What was once "true feminism", has become a different beast alltogether. Which is just sad really. Feminism, for what its…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 09:47 AM
30

Feminism doesn't equate to women. There's not necessarily hatred towards women in despising a political gender supremacy movement. Much like I don't feel hated as a man, just because you find men pointing this out to be incels. I take solace in the fact that you are just misguided and wrong.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 09:41 AM
1

Considering my own reluctance and unwillingness to seek help I'm biased to suspect some errors in this research if said conclusion is in fact what it shows.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 03:14 PM
6

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions" Bet none of the people responsible for this campaign even think or considers themselves being misandrist. It haven't even occured to them.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 12:05 PM
3

...well, if you are a representative of feminism, and your behaviour here is indicative.... Do you really blame them for engaging more with a post critical of an ideology that clearly villify MRAs unjustly? You are kinda proving my point about the issues feminism have, by acting exactly like you are. We're done here. Go be a vile human being somewhere else.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:23 AM
8

You lost the plot. This was your argument; The problem with men's right is that all it does is complain about female rights and doesn't thrive one single fuck about one single men's right. And every one of you would love to go back 40 years and stay there, even if zero men's rights issues were ever resolved. One day... likely many years from now, a true men's rights movement will BEGIN and it will realize that women's rights are key to men's rights. And everyone's rights. One day. ...now you are…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:03 PM
7

why don't you actually read a little bit, instead of being combative and weird. Most, if not all, of the items mentioned here are rarely, if ever, brought up in feminist space or forum. If anything, they usually show up to picket or protest any MRAdvocacy. Thinking that any voice for men, is a voice against women. Much like you do just now. If feminism spent at least a minority of its time improving men's issues, I'd at least entertain the idea they attempt to be a movement for equality. They've…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 08:10 PM
15

Your argument doesn't correlate with observed reality. Feminists, and their agenda, rarely line up with men's rights, or even equality in general.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 06:43 PM
1

she's about to be cancelled, isn't she?
/r/MensRights04/05/21 07:33 AM
19

there's a difference in criticising the feminist movement for their ideological failures, and the shortcoming in culture when it comes to equality... ...and outright shitting on women. Learn it. Here's my downvote.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 06:24 AM
-1

As someone else said earlier; "it's being talked about relentlessly on this sub." Not sure why I'm being downvoted for pointing out the same. But since we're on negative karma already; chances are this is very much tied to the US, and how they are nation of slightly retarded people. Culturally accepted male circumcision good evidence for said mental defects. Here's a clue; there's no God. You guys are chopping off perfectly healthy tissue for no other reason than superstition and ignorance. God …
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:08 PM
-4

it doesn't get talked about often??! You aren't really usually around on this sub, now are you?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 11:09 AM
53

Pretty sure to start this thread in 2021 requires some sort of deep-seated underlying mental issue. How do you even muster up the specific brand of American puritanism required to feign outrage over a decade old gossip item like this?
/r/PussyPass15/03/21 09:59 PM
2

...makes you wonder what subs the user usually posts in with their regular account, doesn't it? Why even use a throwaway for a totally unreliable story that includes no discernible personal details, and post it in a sub often targetted with lies and brigading tactics, just to stay around for the few seconds it take to post it, and reply to the very first comment. Why even stay silent in a thread that has near 2k upvoted in 10 hours? Seems to me a normal person would come back to check whats goin…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 08:10 AM
1

Totally agree. Check username and post history.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 07:19 AM
-1

This story is actually too unbelievable for me to buy. First, the user reeks of lies bloody lies(check name and post history), secondly, there's no law against sharing the business info of this place. Unless OP provides some proof, or put his money where his mouth is and expose the business, they can fuck off. C'mon guys. This is a troll.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 07:18 AM
1

Hehe, yeah, maybe not that one. (not seen that particular reference, but it seems unique to Simpsons) But it's a slow process, and it's usually a reveal, often years, if not decades in the making
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:35 AM
6

I feel this is defeatist. So much change has in fact been enacted in social movements by people infiltrating hate groups, and just being a kind and emphatic, opposing their biases by virtuous example. Yes, people almost never change their mind in real-time, but the seed of sedition needs to come from somewhere. Left alone, hatred will fester and spread. Where I do agree OPs post applies; is if you are at your wits end, and have no more patience to stay cool, kind, courteous and collected against…
/r/MensRights10/03/21 01:51 PM
1

Indeed. Why I felt the need to paranthesis the word. It's the whole 'why do otherwise reasonable people believe in unreasonable things'- that you kinda see in fundamentally religious people with high academic credentials. Two things that in theory shouldn't be possible to combine without one falling away.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 03:23 AM
61

What saddened me the most about that campaign, is how there's still some genuine voices of (reason) out there that seemingly do not grasp the issue with the message they deliver. I mean, how more blatant can it possibly be? Where do you rest your bias, to not recognize the bigotry and thinly veiled misandry?
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:35 PM
2

In all fairness, (and to expand on what I alluded to earlier about self-flagellation) I do understand what you mean, and I think I understand where your head's at. You seem like a genuine sweetheart (no /s intended. Really) The issue here is that your good intentions are being railroaded by a flawed ideology that aims to weaponize mens inherent strength, weaknesses and intrinsic value as something to be regulated, shamed or villified. Menslib, and most venues where doctrines from the faux femini…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:30 PM
11

Alrighty then. Did someone mention self-flagellation earlier? Because I just got served a whole heaping of it.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 04:27 AM
18

oh, my mistake then. Let me guess, it was suspended because 'misandry' is a figment of men's imagination? Right? I'm sure that was the argument.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 05:34 AM
11

no, user is probably just thrown out of the first one.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 03:02 AM
8

wait, what? Men treated like human beings? With actual feelings? Never have I ever. Someone check if it's cold outside. Hell might have frozen over! ...but seriously, glad someone found something positive to post. I know my mood certainly needed it!
/r/MensRights02/03/21 07:25 PM
4

Nice. Thank you for doing the grunt work of digging it up. That the thread has been nuked could actually confirm my suspicion about there being some ill legitimacy involved. Then again, it's a TwoX post that doesn't immediately trash men as villains, and that could be reason enough for it to be cleansed by the mods.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 11:39 AM
1

This was actually an interesting take. Not sure I've ever considered that comments on whether or not we look good with or without beard is a comment on our appearance akin to someone blurting out to a women acquintance that they look good without makeup. I wanna stress that I don't think either comment should ever warrant a reacton of dismissal or scorn, but it's nevertheless a double standard that was non-apparent to me.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 09:13 AM
0

No, I had no ideas about any of the numerous subreddits you mention. This is true. I am very curious as to how my 'reasoning about the dates is bizarre'. How so? And what part is hard to understand? On second thought, let's make all those questions rhetorical and rather re-iterate and explain in detail instead. It's basically two-fold: Re-posts are lazy content, usually made to farm karma by OP, or to galvanize an audience to think something is more prevalent than it is. The more often it's repo…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 05:11 AM
3

mostly my frustration with the degree of 'repost' this must be. Also, 2015 is sufficiently old for said person to have either divorced or had some serious change in her relationship since this post; meaning we're basically reading a half-finished version of a story that peaked my interest as to how it eventually unfolded since 2015. Barring all that, it can all be B*S for all we know. People actually realizing 'they' are in the wrong, and posting about in on the internet on top of that, is so ra…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 04:19 AM
12

Okay, this is a 2015 article, supposedly re-written from a confessional found on Reddit. I'd be much more happy seeing this in its Reddit-form, than this suspiciously sourced normie-article with a format that makes me doubt it's legitimacy. Other than that, I'm flabberghasted its so hard for people to come to a place where they are truly able to self-reflect. It doesn't seem that hard to me. Then again, I'm not a well-functioning human being. Maybe being in constant denial is a good thing. Somet…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:38 PM
29

and yet, if you add just one more field to the arbitrary exclusion of it from STEM, namely medicine; you'll left with more women in higher education than men yet again. You wanna argue that medicine is a waste of time-college degree too, or you'll rather realize that the STEM talking point exists solely because it's the only way for brainwashed feminists to protect their flawed talking point? This is why you are being downvoted. "Women in STEM" is blatant example of cherry picking data to suit y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/21 04:27 AM
1

No good has ever come from someone named Krantz
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/21 04:15 AM
3

oh, I totally agree. But you couldn't tell the brainwashed the same. Modern day feminism is such a sad state of affair, considering the importance that women suffragettes obviously was. "You either die a hero, or you live long enough to become the villain"
/r/MensRights22/02/21 08:05 AM
144

because it was never about equality. It's about revenge, and the narrative of women as perpetual victims.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 09:17 PM
3

...this is the way. At least we can all agree that the reasons we pick our redditnames are often dumb, immature and arbitrary ;-)
/r/MensRights11/02/21 12:14 PM
2

Criticism where criticism is due. This case is mostly the D.A and the police's fault. Everyone else is a victim.
/r/PussyPass06/02/21 06:27 PM
-1

after trying to even understand what the argument is about, I'm now curious wtf 'auth-right' is? Another flawed term that is as non-explanatory as 'alt-right'?
/r/MensRights27/01/21 01:10 PM
-1

the music and the faux science makes me highly doubt this is anything but a joke. Seems to me more of a spoof of radfems. If so, I'm glad they're falling for it too.
/r/PussyPass19/01/21 01:17 PM
9

This is the rare instance of Reddit were I saw the need to updoot both sides of the argument! Good job, my dudes!
/r/PussyPass13/01/21 06:00 PM
16

Reading this, it concerns me that feminism seems to have rebranded the word "patriarchy" to mean something different than it originally meant. Which might explain why listening to feminists using that word becomes so frustrating, because it's basically listening to a made-up langauge of cultmembers trying to explain themselves in the real world. By now, I'll even wager that the wikipedia entry for 'patriarchy' reflects this change too. Wonder if they updated matriarchy to match. If unchanged, se…
/r/MensRights11/01/21 02:44 PM
1

You are criticizing someone else for lacking the abilty to see nuance, and cannot comprehend a difference of more than 3 years between teens and young adults doesn't neccessarily facility a big difference in maturity. The one in this discussion lacking the ability to understand any perspective but their own..., is you. Then you impose a fantasy of someone inserting their mature self into this discussion, just to construct a massive strawman since you are losing the discussion. A rape is a rape i…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 04:01 PM
0

you are the one with the "mental gymnastics" I was clearly talking about teenagers being both parties in any scenario above, and advocating that rape and sexual coersion should be treated as such no matter the age of any participants involved. The fact that you actually 'hear' something else when you read, like a '30 year old" and whatever else you are going on about, is the issue here. You are projecting your own situation probably, unable to remember or contemplate how life would be for teenag…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 07:45 AM
9

for the record, you are the one in the wrong here. Living outside of the States, seeing US laws, and their puritanical views on sex between all ages of teenagers, borders on trying to understand a priest from the dark ages arguing for his morality being just. The laws are extremely arbitrary when imposing age restrictions, and fails to take into account the very different ways in which we mature. Outside of protecting any person of any age against rape or sexual coersion, there's almost no need …
/r/MensRights28/12/20 03:06 PM
2

This article read like a POS teen, grows up to be a POS Phd candidate adult. Also, it's a bit "cool story, bro". There's so much borderline fanfiction in his surface level description of things, I'm more or less inclined to believe half of it isn't quite true. It's riddled with the Dunning Kruger effect too, where one person applies one set of standards to an ideology, but not the other, thinking the differences is caused by his own enlightenment, and not bigotry.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 02:36 AM
1

I totally agree with the Crown Prosecution. Minors should not be put in prison. We oughta imprison more young girls, maybe there's some movement on that reform. If they don't care about us, at least make sure there's plenty of chances for them to display their doublestandards.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 08:45 AM
8

Something sure is. But lets not do the same stupid thing, and call it "toxic feminism" We all know already how dumb that debate will be, and adopting a flawed term will poison the actual topic of there being a systemic problem with male recruitment for higher education
/r/MensRights15/12/20 11:53 AM
4

well, if you are genuinely this ignorant about the topic(and I don't mean it derogatory), then Oncefa2 is one of the finest educators. But I'm not sure you should claim to be an MRA before you at least know a little more about both history and advocacy. Chances are you'll wind up misrepresenting issues if you were ever to defend such a stance having so little knowledge about it. Again, not really meant offensive, but if your last statement really is true; then almost all your previous questions …
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:57 AM
2

Read this entire exchange, and this comes off to me as an atheist debating a religious person. An atheist have heard all these arguments before, and everytime the theist comes with the same tired tripe, the answer is always fairly cookie-cutter and copy paste. It takes so long for the discussion to advance, because the lack of education about atheism is apparent. Regardless; it always starts with the theist basically asking from ignorance; "what are really the issues an atheist have with religio…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:47 AM
2

this is one of those comments that if screenshot, and slutshamed most other places, will live on in infamy. Good job.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 07:36 PM
1

Mhm, that was a convincing argument. I suppose you are right. Pointing out bigotry would only work if the system itself listened to you in the first place. I have personal experience, knowing that this is not the norm when you are male. I still wouldn't die on this hill thou, as there's so many more worse instances of misandry out there, but I have to concede this point indeed. I also recognize the second point of your argument, as I grew up pretty much brainwashed by the same set of cultural no…
/r/MensRights06/12/20 06:39 PM
1

Not sure how selective censorship is possibly any better than not banning anything at all. All censorship are bad. All thought policing is vile, and any hindrance to speech is no longer free speech. Any step towards less flagging, and/or less censorship and intervention, is a step in the right direction. edit; that way, you can use this change to point out the bigotry, and get further steps taken in the future.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 12:45 PM
-9

Technically, we're making a fuzz about potentially less flagging, i.e: less orwellian policies. Not sure I wanna die on this hill. Fuck these social media platforms. edit; All of these downvotes, I see we have a bunch of ...facebook fans here? I mean, wow. Just wow. Please, have fun on the hill with the rest of the facebook demographic. At least I assume most of you is dragging the age-average down ^
/r/MensRights04/12/20 08:55 AM
33

Men's lib use of the term "toxic masculinity" as an actual thing and not pseudo scientific propaganda gets me every time. How is it that feminists with a straight face gets away with promoting that sub as proper channel for men? It's akin to religious people promoting scientology as an alternative to psychological treatment.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:16 PM
63

Gillette stopped existing as a brand a few years ago. You don't use their products. You don't speak their name.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 06:59 PM
3

Remember raising concerns about this back in 2015, without getting any national traction or recogntion for it. Back then the video was mostly universally liked, and hailed as an important campaign to better society for girls and women. The feeling of being right about something, but having the entire society telling me I'm wrong was overwhelming. Thankfully, since then, the numbers have gradually self-corrected, but the amount of crazy oblivious praise this campaign gathered at the beginning was…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 03:23 PM
2

This is my experience too. I'm fed this narrative that this sub is toxic and full of neanderthals, while a more "proper" place for mens right advocacy would be menslib or just shutting the fuck up and listen while the feminists preach. Kinda reminds me of trying to argue how Pewdiepie is a really decent human being. Against people who have never seen his content, and only heard of him secondhand from the media. What is seemingly evident and obvious, seems somehow murky and nefarious if just enou…
/r/MensRights20/09/20 08:44 PM
1

I thought feminism was about equality in my formative years. Obviously a dispelled notion at this point. If it ever was about equality, that must have been long before my time. My earliest memory of gender disparity, was how my primary school textbooks back in the 80s always portrayed the "dad" or the male illustration as a buffon, or a sit-com stereotype of lazy couch-potato. I remember thinking it was strange that all men and boys always where the butt of the joke. Very innocent ofc, but this …
/r/MensRights14/09/20 10:40 AM
50

the amount if disdain and dismissal you get from feminists if you attempt this argumentation, makes it so hard to change. You are basically persona non grata if you question their ideology, and their precious pseudo-scientific gender studies theories. And on top of that; they seem to think you are the conspiracy theorist, for poking, probing and questioning their institutionalized misandry. Anyone else noticed recently that they push their menslib subreddit, basically selling it as a mens rights…
/r/MensRights13/09/20 01:22 PM
1

please do not post misleading and/or misrepresenting stuff like this in the sub. You know how easily this sub is a target. Do not give them easily accessible ammuntion for said criticism.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 05:23 PM
2

yeah, you're probably right. Nevertheless, the way she's being up in arms about the slap brought me there immediately.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 05:19 PM
2

this is written in a way I almost believe she must be aware of the meme. (how dare she slap?!)
/r/MensRights11/08/20 05:09 PM
2

Yes, that is the neck of a human being having never touched steroids once. Sure.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 11:48 PM
1

well, obviously. That is the meme. But its plausible that some of these are couples doing it for the tik tok points too. If Christina P has taught me anything, its how garbage people can be on that site. But yeah, there's no reason the man needs to be included in the joke. The women runs no risk doing this
/r/MensRights14/07/20 05:01 PM
2

well, as a compilation it's pretty funny. But its hard as a man to look at this, and not think of the double standard clearly visible. Even if staged, some of these will get you thrown in jail if the roles where reversed. On the basis of the accusation alone.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 03:21 PM
1

For someone out of US, how is this even illegal? Like, I understand the impetous to fire these teachers for corrupting their profession ethically, but why is the state concerned about punshing with prison sentences what I assume is consensual sex by both parties? (assuming there's no minors involved)
/r/PussyPass17/06/20 09:04 PM
4

sure, but the loaded terminology used, will pretty much inform anyone with half a brain that it's clearly made by ideologues with an agenda. The ignorant ones are already lost anyway. Obvious dishonest badmouthing, especially when its so rampant on their pages, might actually be beneficial. If I were a random normie feminist, and read how MRA's are portrayed on that website, I'd actually be motivated to investigate further, because I'd hate to be on the side of an ideological cabal so clearly ha…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 12:03 AM
2

On the positive side. Well, kinda'. Those definitions, clearly left there by self-declared feminists, provide ample evidence for the systemic prosecution and misrepresentations about MRA's and their issues in popular culture. I started scrolling, and gave up before I could even find something even remotely looking like a non-biased description of MRAs. Impressive brigading. Good job, misandrists.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 10:40 PM
68

can't wait to hear what 'slap on the wrist'-sentence she'll eventually receive. Let's guess..; 18 months probation with time served? Maybe a little house arrest?
/r/MensRights24/03/20 10:31 PM
4

all I'm saying is that one moments sudden realization doesn't undo decades of misconceptions. I'm fine not commenting on her post, and silently recognizing someone coming about, but I'm not gonna applaud her virtue-signalling newfound clarity. Thou, I agree we shouldn't be raining on her parade. It IS a good thing. Planting flowers in a nuclear wasteland helps a little, I guess.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:31 PM
28

this exchange reminds me of those old-timey stories about life-long racists who befriend someone which they discriminate against most their life, only to realize they are human too. Realising you've been an asshole too late in life, doesn't warrant absolute absolution. Not sure we fully pardoned former KKK-members for this, so I'm kinda iffy about being all too nice towards this lady for her eureka moment. Too little, too late.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 07:48 PM
1

You have access to TwoXChromosones? And they haven't banned you yet? Are you an unicorn?
/r/MensRights27/01/20 01:59 PM
-9

So hard to make any informed comments on this subject, as I really don't trust the court systems where this originated. After having seen the travesty that was the Amanda Knox case(she was obviously innocent), there's really no reason to believe Cyprus courts are better. Chances are this girl is probably right in some of her accusations, but there's just no way to prove exactly what happened. Therefore, the case must be dismissed. Her giving false statements(which was highly interpretated by the…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:25 PM
2

The mental gymnastics needed to be a feminist seems exhausting. No wonder they request less working hours!
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:21 AM
16

think that is the definitions of "MGTOW"s
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:29 PM
1

Posted 1 min ago, screenshotted and then taking here? Troll post much? This is obviously a fake. Seems to me that sub is awful enough without needing to create false controversy.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 09:16 PM
1

or it could be that it's assertion that doesn't adhere to your bias, and your last reply came off as mostly lashing out. How is history relevant when my claim was that religion is an outdated social technology? Ofcourse religion had historic uses, I never said otherwise. Religious institutions where almost exclusively the only place where knowledge was kept and stored through most of the ages. ...which it definitely isn't anymore. You couldn't possibly disagree with that. Going back to your orig…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 10:26 PM
1

Again, you are reading into what I'm saying something that isn't claimed. I'm saying there's no intrinsic truth/morale value in religion. And I'm not claiming that religion is responsible for bad people. But it sure is a useful tool for bad people to spread their ideas. Or harbor them long past their expiration date. Be it people, or ideas. If we subtract religion from the equation, we're left with the exact same in individuals. So I'm not blaming religion, I'm arguing it doesn't add anything. I…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 04:58 PM
1

I agree with all points, also I used my own personal bias as an example for my investment in it, further solidifying how I would never escape said bias, but its also why I included the term "upbringing" in my original statement. It could be that your entire social culture has some form of toxic mindworm that is indoctrinating a large swath of the population into normalizing bad behaviour. Which is why I think religion is being mentioned at all in this discussion. Religions are kinda well-known f…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:56 PM
1

using myself as an example; when I did something I shouldn't do as a child I felt bad, even thou I didn't understand yet why I felt bad. My upbringing taught me why doing certain things made me feel bad about them, and how to vocalize when these things occured. That was the maturity process. But it was always inherent and self-evident to me that doing something to hurt or inflict pain upon others for my own benefit was wrong, even if doing so rewarded me in the short term. So that is what upbrin…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:34 PM
1

That might be true. I'm not sufficiently informed about Catholic standards besides them finding virtue in shielding child molesters from prosecution. My point being; there's no intrinsic truth in religion, least of all Catholicism. It's just a governing tool, using indoctrination, psychology and mind control to keep people in check.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:13 PM
1

Children aren't mature adults with adult brains. So, extremely irrelevant to the point I'm making. Also why the term "upbringing" is used.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:02 PM
2

No contradiction, the inherent fact is that homo sapiens is a social species, and therefore they aim to behave in a way that maximize the benefit of themselves, both individiually and as a group. Since acting like a selfish moron would ostricise you from the group, leaving you alone to fend for yourself, it's selfevident to any individual in this system that its non-beneficial to do anything to risk this. Which is often why most behaviour that is deemed atypical are 'anti-social'. Laws, ethics, …
/r/MensRights29/09/19 11:30 PM
2

I think we're done here. I'm not wasting more time debating a race realist. Most your assumptions are flawed or straw men anyway, so this is gonna take forever to unpack, and you've been consistently failing to properly address my points. One thing thou; civilization, any definition of the term, predates the Romans by millennia. But yeah, I suppose I meant social communities, tribes, or packs of homogenous people working together to the benefit of everyone within said tribe. Most of which, would…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 11:00 PM
3

still not reading what is written. Good people are the same form of 'good', no matter the laws or cultural norms of the place. Causing harm to other people, or their property, is inherently not an action that should feel rewarding to anyone, no matter the culture, laws, or ethics of the time. A person with this disposition is inclined to enact the same sort of behaviour now, as 4000 years ago. If the promise of 'eternal hell' or 'punishment by law' is the only reason you opt out of doing bad thi…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 10:14 PM
8

Not what AnarchySoda said. Read his statement again. A good person doesn't need society to tell them what is right or wrong. Understanding how to behave is inherent and self-evident. If you do need religion to 'guide', or laws to teach you, from doing bad things, something is inherently wrong with your psychological makeup/cultural upbringing.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 09:24 PM
30

and much like with everything else; femcels aren't stigmatized or ridiculed as with their male counterparts. Its almost like we live in a culture placating to the opposite sex of what feminists claim...
/r/MensRights11/07/19 10:09 AM
3

There's no "rise". It's always been this way. Also, she avenged herself by turning her experiences into a g'damn book. That kinda dedication to payback is pretty feminine too.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:16 PM
0

I was just asking why there were so many of these similar looking videos all of a sudden. A fucking completely valid question. Somehow the fuckfaces of this shitstain place feel that their in-group sanctimony is attacked by someone just asking for further evaluation of their sources. The "think for myself and critically evaluate stuff" is because you asked for a reason. If you really didn't need the answer, maybe not pose the question, and blame me for elitism afterwards. For doing your bidding.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 02:13 PM
0

You mean reposts and shady sources? I don't know. The ability to think for myself and critically evaluate stuff, I suppose. Not being a mindless automoton? Take a pick. The human race is a cesspool of in-group monkeys.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 02:00 PM
-6

Your mom must be proud of you.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 12:07 AM
-22

are you guys really gonna downvote someone doubting the veracity of a repost from a compilation channel created less than a month ago, which also seemingly steals content? /r/WatchRedditDie seems to have a point about what godawful place this site has become.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/19 09:40 PM
-34

There's so many of these recently I start to suspect someone is faking and manufacturing them. Are there really that many similar looking girls doing similarly stupid things on similarily looking campuses?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/19 09:33 PM
13

Now, imagine writing this as a man too, in a female space, and ipso-presto! : If it weren't for the reddit banhammer instantly wiping you out of existence, you'd be downvoted into Reddit prison for instigating toxic masculinity on the well-meaning masses!
/r/MensRights16/02/19 01:08 PM
1

Well, ...duh. We could have told you that, Harvard?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 10:22 AM
2

Using Reddit as a venue, is it safe to speculate about this co-founder of the same site seeming like the very textbook definition of someone enjoying cuckoldry or submissive play?
/r/MensRights17/11/18 06:56 PM
1

at least it really sounds like you've touched upon the essence of how it feels like being a man. The desire to die young to get away from women in general is really a huge part of it... :-)
/r/MensRights04/10/18 08:47 AM
5

Don't ya' know?! "Misandry is a victimless crime" -Richard Dawkins
/r/MensRights28/09/18 11:12 AM
-1

The dissenting twitter "random" twitter opinion: Riley J. Dennis... KEK! I adore old media and their habitual cluelessness. It's cute. Like a retiree trying out one of the younglings new toys
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:44 PM
0

I'm 12, and what is this?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/18 11:42 AM
8

You can do the same with r/TwoXchromosomes. I've posted twice, got banned twice. Soon year 3 is coming up and my ban might once again be lifted. Time to be banned again for pointing out hypocrisy or logical fallacies in there.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:32 AM
1

the whole text blurp from the "professor" seems fake. Language doesn't seem genuine.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:45 PM
1

so how about this. Your rather cynical claim is probably not the right one. Considering Laci is making less and less content, and she has never shown signs of caring about the growth of her channel, or to stifle controversial discourse. The path she's on is the most likely one following her statements about herself and how she thinks long before she jumped ship. It's just unlikely your cyniscism will be shown to be anything but speculative and false.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter