Mountain_Subject_112 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Debunking "The Future is Female" Im not Saying thats how i feel its how many of these people will feel Perhaps, perhaps not. It is an unreasonable belief to hold, given it is not grounded in reason or reality. i wonder if thats more so because of the whole "you can get lots of benfits from being seen as gay" so women will use it to gain the upper hand and ive seen this where someone is."lesbian" and they have a husband down the line and i know it isnt them using him as a beard because they were quite open about it before Men an…	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 04:35 PM
3	Debunking "The Future is Female" And with the constant demonisation of men, well, most women are brainwashed into thinking the only benefit of men is kids so if thats gone Blunt, perhapse even crude, but somewhat accurate. Why not? why not be with a girl? I'm not saying female sexuality is fluid or not. I've seen evidence to suggest it is, and evidence to suggest it isn't. But I'd advise caution in making claims that boil down to "well, I didn't like fucking X, so I guess I'll fuck Y instead." There's no real reason not to be? …	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 04:02 PM
2	Debunking "The Future is Female" but thats sexist acording to le feminists) I wouldn't worry too much about what feminists claim. Most of them don't know their ideology from their own ideas, are barely coherent enough to form a single non-contradictory train of thought, and terminally incapable of approaching things from a reasoned, reality based epistemology. In short; you can safely assume that if they don't like the conclusion, they'll claim it is sexist. and the media pushes it becuase they know some will only the conservat…	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 04:02 PM
2	Debunking "The Future is Female" thats what makes me think its a lesbian tool to pressure women to fuck em Cool your jets, turbo. Social dynamics are far more sophisticated than that, and while sexuality informs a great deal of human nature, sex doesn't. To reduce feminist ideology as a brainwashing device to, presumably, "turn women gay" is not only myopic, but it's simply false. No ifs, buts, maybes. But also that means its not about Muh choice about abortion its just they dont wont women to have the happniess of children and…	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 04:01 PM
12	Debunking "The Future is Female" Simone de Beauvoir was explicit: women should not be authorized to stay at home and care for children, because if they were, too many women would make that choice. Feminism doesn’t give a fuck about women, not really. The most common thread in feminism isn’t pro-women, it’s anti men	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 02:57 PM
6	Debunking "The Future is Female" As an aside, if you read Gearharts essay, it doesn’t say zero men. It just endorses a manageable, safe amount of us. 1 to 10% of the global population iirc. That way we can contribute our genetic material safely without disrupting the feminist utopia of women with our male presence	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 02:26 PM
3	Debunking "The Future is Female" According to feminist thought leaders like Gearhart, female sexual fantasy as it pertains to men is an imposed psychosis on the part of patriarchal dominance over women. In layman’s terms, the reality of some women possessing consensual non-consent fantasies, or ravager-ravagee fantasies (“rape” fantasies for the kink illiterate) is implied to be a victim-generated coping mechanism, a way for women to psychologically endure the inherent oppression of existing in a patriarchal rape culture, or pa…	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 02:24 PM
11	Debunking "The Future is Female" All good mate. And yeah, it isn’t new. My operating principle these days regarding any feminist assertion is to treat it as projection. So far it hasn’t led me astray. Fact of the matter is that for every claim of female oppression that feminism has made in the last nearly 200 years (since 1848), every one of them is either sex neutral (ie, the shitty circumstance affects men and women mostly equally, like domestic violence and rape) or sex-inverse (that what they’re claiming is actually a probl…	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 01:50 PM
26	Debunking "The Future is Female" You should probably read the essay that slogan came from (the future—if there is one—is female, by Sally Miller-Gearhart.) Your post isn’t wrong, per se, but it’s missing the point of the source material (which is far darker than you likely anticipate. Hint: it involves male eugenics)	/r/MensRights	18/04/25 01:32 PM
1	feminists can't claim feminism is about equality and not also advocate for equality for men. Feminism absolutely can and does advocate for equality. The problem isn’t in its mission statement. Everyone agrees with its mission statement. The problem lies in; 1) how it defines equality, and 2) how it measures equality. Feminism doesn’t have double standards. It is entirely coherent within its own framework. Referring to feminism as though it is somehow falling short of the mark it set for itself is wilfully naive at this point. Feminism is doing exactly what in intends to do, and always h…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/04/25 01:09 PM
3	My quick look and thoughts about the study ‘I’m a red-blooded male’: Understanding men’s experiences of domestic abuse through a feminist lens It’s hard to tell whether the authors intentionally mean to further undermine patriarchy theory with this paper (or they have a critical lack of self awareness), but it’s worth pointing out that the man box assertion is highly suspect. Are these attitudes regarding masculinity the true ideals/values of men, or are they feminist attitudes regarding masculinity? Because hyper sexuality, control of women, and rigid gender roles in the home are things I’ve never seen associated with masculinity by m…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/04/25 12:53 AM
5	My quick look and thoughts about the study ‘I’m a red-blooded male’: Understanding men’s experiences of domestic abuse through a feminist lens It’s a little weird that you haven’t heard of it before, but also kind of not. It was popularised by Millett in the mid 20th century, and the buzzword is everywhere, but it also forms the bedrock of a bunch of other theories. Now, feminist proponents and adjacent ideologues don’t really need to directly invoke the term “patriarchy” because it is assumed. So a lot of the feminist or feminist adjacent ideological dogmas running around today are throwing around terms like intersectionality (etc). I…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/04/25 12:47 AM