TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mr-X1 Archive

View 0 posts and 2,880 comments by Mr-X1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,880 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You misunderstood. That user made it clear that dumb was a qualifier to contrast with non-dumb people with that hair color. Because we would do that for Brunette people and that explains why they even apologized to me. Furthermore, they were using it very much like a gendered slur. Which is also against the rules here. And would this fly here if somebody brought up a stereotype against any other group? Lastly, me reversing it got my comments removed. Where is the logic in that (given that I did …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 11:39 PM
1

Is stereotyping people as dumb because of their hair color bigotry or not?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 11:11 PM
3

I noticed that an enormous amount of feminists seem to be racist. More so than non-feminists. Too bad there are probably no good stats on this.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 10:37 PM
10

While I have not been struck by a woman, I not too long ago had one tell me she would have hit me if she could. Pfft.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 10:08 PM
1

Yes, it is very common. Just like racism and bigotry in left-wing spaces.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 10:06 PM
1

Here is how I view it: Somebody might be a virgin. Somebody might be celibate. Somebody might be involuntarily celibate. Somebody might be a sexist of this or that kind. All of those things are different and while there is some obvious overlap (virgins are celibate), it makes no sense not to differentiate those things properly. As for those ideologues, one might call them blackpillers or whatever. That would be more accurate even, given that some of those, lurking in their lookism or whatever fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 03:28 PM
1

In the 90s. The only reason the identifier exists now is because of its use in blackpill ideology. I do not agree. I have seen it used in this very literal sense endlessly, so clearly, this meaning, which makes the most sense in a certain sense, is absolutely perfectly fine to use if we only consider that criteria. Even if you want to insist there are legitimate use cases for Incel it's running defense for actual Incels Actual Incel = People who cannot get laid. Not necessarily mysognists, misan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 03:12 PM
1

Funny that you say this. And I don't see a reason why it ought to be reclaimed. Virgin was fine and continues to be just fine. So much for that. Also, you are totally ignoring his point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 03:00 PM
1

So much bullshit. Incel just means you are incapable of getting laid. That's it. I'm saying there is no reason to use this word in the general sense. Except that such people exist. Pfft. And people using the word to mean "boys who struggle with relationships" and people who use it as a political insult are watering it down and the result will be cover against people who do self identify and are mysogynistic. Think about the women!11 It is based on action or held beleifs De-facto wrong. You might…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 02:51 PM
1

How many did you meet that you just make this claim?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 11:15 AM
1

In that thread was also a self-proclaimed queen telling him that his "anger" stems from his "entitlement".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/22 07:23 PM
1

She is also already a "radical" herself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/22 05:10 PM
10

Then 20 years of patriarchy before that. So do we have a matriarchy now? Or by what standard do you call that bs back then a patriarchy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/22 08:29 AM
13

Eventually you won't even have to be an incel to be considered one, just be single and not conventionally attractive. I really hope that the Anglos etc will not manage to spread this bullshit to the rest of the developed world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 05:29 PM
1

"Ugly" women, visibly physically-ill women (especially if it makes them look "gross" to most people), sometimes women from the "wrong" ethnic groups according to a given observer's eye, women who are old or even women who are very overweight, people do not treat such women the same way as they treat other more conventionally desirable women. In extreme cases, some women become disposable as well. So one can imagine this issue via some spectrum, filling in the extreme of the bad side, and if one …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 05:23 PM
2

Just really wish I got an article in my inbox saying “We need to stand up for men and their rights in this conflict. The male gender is not to be used as fodder in wars” Too many people have nothing to gain from this position, while quite a few would lose some of their privileges. Also reminds me of Middle-Class people in my country justifying practices to keep the children of lower class people down by literally saying stuff like "someone has to clean the toilets" etc. Edit: Men are the primary…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 04:54 PM
29

Typical BBC bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 04:49 PM
1

There was once a wave of articles about air conditioners in many Western offices, and by Western they meant the UK and the USA of course (lmao), and how are allegedly set a temperature that is convenient for men and not for women. Which would allegedly be a significant disadvantage and a good example for the structural disadvantages that women still face.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 01:41 AM
1

(which btw happened with many older women in Ukraine as well). Btw I noticed that people in general (!) care way less about older women. As to women: those I spoke to, did care. They can't change much, they're not politicians or journalists, but they say, they wouldn't leave their husbands and sons in such situation and I have no reason not believe them. Strange how as a group people are so predictable though. Pretty sure in many countries, before their wars happened, you would have found the eq…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 12:43 AM
1

Yes, I too saw "them receive" lots of verbals. So great.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/22 12:16 AM
1

why many men in Ukraine are more happy, that at least their women could leave, than they are angry, that they had to stay. I wonder if there are actually good sources on their views. If I was a young Ukrainian single man for example, all else being equal, I would not perceive those women to be "mine" in any sense basically. So I would primarily care about the unfairness of it all. Not that anyone would really care, of course. Therefore it is really crucial for all empathetic women to speak about…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/22 11:58 PM
1

It's basically the same thing as always. Equal rights and privileges but no responsibilities. Strictly speaking, more rights and privileges. Just because the media is not showing any wars or events that depend on men being Expendables doesn't mean they aren't always happening. Is not basically every armed conflict like this? So this stuff is constantly happening and shown in much of Western media, and thus it is normalized? It's even worse instead of being called brave Right now men get called b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/22 11:50 PM
1

Having no resources in the mainstream media to teach them certain skills, and how to be more attractive doesnt exactlty help either. Does this really matter that much, ultimately? There is some decent stuff out there, but ultimately, is it all even worth it? Rationally speaking, probably not, for many men. but eventually just decided to take what I believed in like hypergamy, monkey branching, shaming tactics, and rejected the things i didnt belive in, Basically how it was supposed to be. Take w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/22 11:45 PM
1

I wonder also: Where is the Feminist outrage against all this sexism? Seems like this is less important to them than sexist air conditioners.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/22 04:47 PM
5

There is also the fact that very often women just cannot relate to common male experiences. They just do not know much about what it means to be a man. This is even more the case when it comes to less privileged men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 10:19 AM
6

There was a lot of sexist stuff of that kind in her article (she also implied some idiotic stuff about evolutionary selection and its relations to culture etc which is very common with certain Anglo types), but because she said a few things people here like while being female she gets worshiped here. Really quite telling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 10:16 AM
-1

Part 2. I suppose it all ties back into the expectation for men to take the active role in courtship and women to take the passive role. Btw I think this is a strong simplification. The expectation for women is not so much to be totally passive, as many people seem to take this simplification, but rather to generally (i.e. in most situations and contexts) be not too overt and direct in their "approaches" etc. However, like other emotions men are punished for having, I'm sure it touches many area…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/22 12:50 PM
0

Part 1. Of course if a guy is visibly nervous, sweating, wringing his hands, and barely stuttering out his sentences, that isn't going to make him very attractive to most women. Quite the understatement. I feel like its not just a matter of it being good enough to not be the sweaty nervous guy and adopt a reasonable level of confidence, but of expecting men to almost be like the complete opposite of that. Yes. How else are you going to be useful to a woman? Not saying that this is how it ought t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/22 12:28 PM
1

I'm not white, I am confused as to how it relates to it though Instead of seeing that certain things are due to the confluence of many people's unquestioned choices based on inherent evolutionary favored dispositions a significant amount of people like to scapegoat this or that group for any given unsavory status quo. Similar to how many conspiracy theorists want to believe that virtually everything bad is ultimately due to human control and could be different if only this or that person or grou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/22 10:13 AM
1

About being treated without much sympathy and camerady. It's like they are starving, but don't know this Plenty of men know their lot. One just adapts one's demeanor because the opposite generally is only harmful to one's life and social standing. Even now, with all that I know about navigating the world as a woman, I'm failing to convince my monkey-brain that this amor isn't social rejection. Because in a very real sense it is. Regardless of the justifications. Yes, testosterone absolutely give…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/22 10:00 AM
25

Their whole main idea of men wanting to subjugate women is projection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 12:47 PM
4

By "Anglo" I was referring to the cultures of the big Anglophone countries, who birthed and/or spread most of this bullshit in its current iteration, which is now spreading to other places (btw in no small part due to the internet). Including race-realist talk about "racial backgrounds". When I was younger for example way more people here were less gynocentric and more people were not (at least not openly) race-realists. Now I can sometimes even in real life hear e.g. US-style talking points goi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 12:12 PM
4

Yes, most women will not get to have their cake and eat it. Some do though. And obviously, given how most Western women are, ever less Western men will act this foolish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 12:01 PM
3

Yeah, did he not laugh at first, and then he noticed how his wife reacted? Being an actor he realized in that moment that he had to act to avoid looking bad (which is ridiculous by itself, given what little I know about them). And it seems like it worked for him. Lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 12:00 PM
27

Im somewhat ok with guys being expected to protect girls physically (defending a girl whos being attacked/threatened) Why? And to clarify: A random "girl" in general? I understand the desire to protect children in general, but not random strange women beyond what I would do for a similar man. female progressives often perpetuate gender roles in cases where it benefits them They are not progressive, their ideology is regressive bs, and they love it because they only care about themselves and they…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 10:39 AM
51

Will Smith has to really work on himself and learn some self-respect. Also, at the "real man" thing: Lmao sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 10:36 AM
37

There are men who involuntarily pay child support because of decisions made by the mother. Including men who have to pay for children that are not even theirs. Which they did not know early enough to prevent this from happening. And instead of doing something against this Feminists love that this is the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/22 09:29 AM
1

It's so odd seeing the left adopt "incel" as an insult. The pseudo left has always loved racism, classism, body-shaming etc so honestly nothing odd about this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/22 03:46 PM
29

Coming from the country in which Feminists managed to prevent making rape laws equal. And you will hear no Western etc Feminists ever call this out. Instead they love it.
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/22 09:35 AM
1

do you think anxiety about women, as with loveshy theory, is a primary factor in creating "perpetually single" men? No, it is height, looks, economic prospects and lack of decent logistics, maybe strong introversion, and for some people not being neurotypical. Oh, and a smaller amount of men might be severely mentally ill and be relevantly impacted by that. Mere anxiety about women is probably not that important of a factor for most men in whether they are going to be perpetually single or not. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/22 09:15 AM
1

Balding or rather being bald is associated with being more dominant etc though, and not weakness?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 07:04 PM
1

Lmao at this femcel bs.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/22 06:52 PM
1

Typical Feminist bullshit.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/22 06:51 PM
1

They are racist against Indian men.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/22 06:49 PM
1

Basically racist too.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/22 06:48 PM
1

At least you most likely do not have the "wrong" phenotype.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 06:21 PM
0

The stuff he complains about is pretty tame. Try to enjoy fiction while having the "wrong" phenotype.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 06:19 PM
11

She meant it as a joke/fun statement, but I think she really believes the underlying part. Yeah, this not any different from jokes about various ethnic groups, whether currently socially acceptable or not. It feels like one of those things that seems funny on the surface, but if someone had to ask why the joke is funny you start realizing how messed up it really is. There was virtually never a point in history in which racism and sexism were not acceptable virtually everywhere. Only the specific…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 12:46 PM
20

Worst one was when I dated an outspoken "woke" feminist. Wokism is a gigantic red-flag. Either they are a selfish sociopath or they have the sanity levels of a religious fundamentalist. Or both etc. (excluding my mother) Consider yourself comparatively lucky.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 11:55 AM
4

I have always struggled to have a conversation about this, because it's almost entirely the opposite of my own experience. This is how it usually is, virtually always. It is also very typical for selfish people to just claim the opposite of the truth and muddy the whole conversation by repeating their bs endlessly. What we have here is basically gaslighting at a societal level. Imagine most men would notice how little most women have to offer and do compared to what is expected from men...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 11:50 AM
1

You probably, generally, should not. A good thing to ask is often, would this person do something for me? Very often, with those types, the answer is pretty obvious. Ofc other social costs have to be taken into account too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 04:01 PM
1

Depends on where you live I guess. English speaking countries are pretty backwards in general I guess.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/22 10:45 AM
8

and the right wants to turn men back into workhorses to plow thru the fields Eh? Since when did men stop being that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 10:49 PM
1

This is the only point ill address to because of how asisine it is. And you addressed it with, to quote you, drum roll, "internet rhetorics". My point was perfectly fine and not asinine at all. That is why you have nothing concrete to say to it. And because the rest of your reply it's just internet rhetorics. How ironic that you make this claim (you even pulled the classic "Feminism is so diverse cannot say anything against it in general" bs further down). Also, where is your quote for "The enti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 06:39 PM
1

But this shouldn't be an excuse to vilify feminist or make them "the enemy". No, them lobbying for anti-male laws etc and and trying to benefit the female sex at all costs is what makes them the enemy. That, and the frankly-speaking often disgusting premises of their ideology. I'd say they are about average in that matter. In my life, and online, I saw more Feminists than non-Feminists demand various forms of "neo-chivalry" from men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 06:14 PM
1

mostly I’ve found the typical constant radicalized takes Feminist takes themselves are radicalized takes. Bs takes, anti-scientific and ignoring men's lived experiences on purpose. progressive discourse What is considered progressive nowadays is often re-clothed, even more one-sided, tradcon-style chivalry and hyper-obsessed race-realism. I found a lot of platitudes and self affirmation and very few truly nuanced takes preoccupied on understanding our zeitgeist and what’s our role in it. Up to a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 06:04 PM
26

Other 2 comments were-but men made the beauty standards Sure, most men, not being tall, made the beauty standard for men to be tall. So not all women hate very masculine men sexually. Lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 05:46 PM
25

It certainly appears that way. But why is it so hard for feminists to see this argument? Many Feminists perceive themselves to benefit from Feminism nonetheless, especially in the here and now with quotas and nice memplexes ready-made for self-serving sophistry etc. Most people primarily care mostly about themselves and their slightly extended circle anyways. So rather than not seeing its usage as a political tool, many Feminists do not care about that as long as they think it serves them well. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 10:44 AM
29

It seems as though the American pseudo-"left" has abandoned class consciousness completely in favor of identity. There is a reason famous, massively influential Feminists like Gloria Steinem were on the CIA's payroll. The US also uses Feminism to promote its imperialist interests and to justify its interventions all around the world. And lots of random feminists are ultimately just selfish idiots (in the alleged ancient Greek sense of the word, where it supposedly referred to people lacking poli…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 10:35 AM
1

If their partner feels their drop in attraction too acutely that can impact the relationship, the perks the woman gets out of it, and the likelihood even of that relationship to continue for the time being (before she has e.g. better alternatives available, or the situation changes). So for them it is better to string the man along for now, keeping him unaware.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 10:17 AM
4

All of those tend to be about how women and girls are allegedly not selfish enough etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 10:14 AM
2

The men in question feel insecure because they've been socialized with the idea that they must be the ones who provide. Also and more importantly because it is literally obvious that many women, generally including their partners, find them sexually (and even "romantically") less attractive for earning less. Lots of heterosexual relationships even end shortly after the man suddenly earns a bit less or the woman gets promoted etc. I wonder also why virtually nobody ever points out how toxic and h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 10:13 AM
5

My point is, no one ever tells men that they’re valid or that these things aren’t important. Including the people who supposedly want to “take on toxic masculinity”. Because those people do not believe that men are "valid" per se or that such things are not important. I just saw a statistic about how women are twice as likely to fake orgasm if they make more money than their male partners. The angle I’m taking on this topic is that the male partners are more insecure and that makes them less att…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 10:09 AM
3

Yes, they would. Many men who changed over time, whether intentionally and directly or as part of some other unrelated development, can attest to that. Btw very often it is the tension etc itself that excites them etc and they do not actually want to change the man. One way to see this is to presume they are testing if this man is still a man that is likely to be useful in the particular ways that such men might be useful to a woman. How consciously they are doing this and how much they are goin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/22 11:49 AM
4

A good option might be to be successful at life in a conventional sense (and learning basic things about social dynamics, style, body-language, etc etc) and going for younger, more attractive women. If you are attractive enough, those might even hit on you when you do not want it. So why settle for something arguably worse instead?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/22 11:47 AM
5

I think a more accurate summation would be: "(Some) women will overlook toxic traits if the guy is attractive enough". There are women who are positively attracted to such traits, many more than you would like to think. And even if a given man's partner was the one exception to his toxic behavior that does not magically transform her attraction to his "toxicness" itself into something else. Lastly, there is a decent amount of women who feel attraction and excitement when they are treated in ways…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/22 11:46 AM
7

For many men dating would become even worse if women were to care less about money. It would just extend a trend we already have in the West of women caring ever more about height, looks, etc. With that being said, financial realities are already much different than in the past. Instead of caring much less about money though, many women started to care more about the other things additionally. The standards are higher in general, and frankly speaking, what many women offer has become much less t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/22 11:15 AM
3

They might befriend men like this Yes, they might "befriend" them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/22 07:15 PM
1

If we talk about individuals acting politically to serve their own interests, seeing them in a manner similar to how we see rational actors in economics, then it seems apparent that "actual gender equality" is just sub-optimal from a selfish perspective compared to something that gives selective benefits to e.g. women or men at the cost of that ideal. And humans are generally, obviously, significantly selfish (not even arguing they should not be per se). Divisive politics are really predictable …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/22 03:04 PM
2

Sometimes I find it very hard to believe that users like the one you replied to actually mean what they are saying. It looks kind of like those people saying:" Ideally, I would want nobody to be drafted" etc etc when the topic of the draft comes up. We all know what such a position tends to amount to in actuality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/22 02:50 PM
2

My own close friend flipped out at me for mentioning the gender of the people getting deported for war when you know damn well that if it was women they would acknowledge it until their throats hurt. It is all about maintaining their privileged status in society. When it comes to that, they are generally not your friend anymore. Presuming that they are female that is; this also reminds me of how economic considerations tend to be more important than friendships. And well, if they are male though…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/22 02:48 PM
6

It's counterproductive to actual gender equality The truth is most people do not want this. They want to be advantaged in the ways they care about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/22 02:46 PM
2

Feminists support things like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/22 01:55 PM
32

The people in power tend to not believe in human rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 12:51 PM
28

There is one primary sense in which men need to be better: Just like women, we have to develop a consciousness of our shared political interests. As it is, even small boys suffer from the consequences of men not having done so. If men as a class fail to develop such a consciousness things will evidently not change for the better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 12:37 PM
115

You will probably not see any significant Feminist reaction against this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 12:32 PM
18

Also "strange" how virtually none of those people ever talk about how gay men are often fetishized in dehumanizing ways, especially by straight women (i.e. just take a look at all those weird "fandoms" online). Not to mention the weird stereotyping that those supposedly woke people often engage in, and the feelings of entitlement they often have towards gay men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/22 09:40 AM
18

I don't expect random women to show up at my house and cook me dinner. They shouldn't expect me to fulfill gender stereotypes either. This. Perfect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/22 06:46 AM
15

Why do so many men want to simp this much? To me posts like this feel like advocacy for a society-wide covert contract, and I cannot easily come up with a single charitable reason as to why somebody would be interested in something like that. Personally I want no part in this bullshit, and I hope the same goes for most other users of this subreddit. And btw here are some spoilers: Whatever you think you will achieve that way, you won't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/22 06:37 AM
9

So disgusting, this level of primitiveness and stupidity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 04:51 PM
7

I think some of the more right leaning men here also like this fantasy because it makes them feel strong, or because they can pose as strong and superior in some sense, at little cost, by pushing this narrative. While being totally emotional about not being as emotional as others etc, of course. I knew men who had noticeably lowered affect. They would generally not give a toss about anything like this. They would for example not go and tell minorities to man up and preach about resilience while …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 01:26 PM
4

I once read in a book that men seem to either experience fewer emotions, but we experience most of those emotions more deeply than women experience theirs (which fits very well with my own observations of male and female behaviors), or that men are basically virtually the same as women in this respect when you control for cultural influences on the self-reporting of "emotional activity". Now, this is all very vague of course, and it is quite some time ago that I read up on these things. Still, m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 01:19 PM
3

They believe that masculinity requires they "engage in acts of psychic self-mutilation" (via hooks). But as somebody who grew up in a very "masculine" upbringing. Whether your masculinity entails that or not at a given point in time depends on your environment and disposition. If you are otherwise "normal enough" as a person but have to live in a very bad, poor, violent environment then indeed your role as a man (and even boy) might entail many forms of emotional regulation that could be seen as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 01:12 PM
5

Yang has lost my respect before for some stuff he did but he gained it back with this. Shit won't ever change because people are this cheap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 01:01 PM
7

Men have none.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 12:54 PM
4

''If you get too many men alone and leave us alone for a while, we kind of become morons," Andrew Yang Imagine being pathetic enough to say something like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/22 11:48 AM
1

Lmao. Yeah.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 06:06 PM
8

Lots of therapy, the way it is now, does not work well for men anyways. Ofc, sometimes it is still necessary, and better than nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 05:53 PM
2

I think most single-sex/single-gender spaces should be abolished. Why? As a dude I wish there were more male only spaces where I live. Some women get incredibly traumatized by make abusers that they start panicking just by being close to a man. The reverse also exists, but ofc virtually nobody gives a fuck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 05:48 PM
13

Pretty sure often they know what they are doing, and are doing politics and social manipulation. And it works. Men generally are way worse at this stuff than women, and also afflicted with various in-born biases that makes it even harder for men to deal with that stuff when the other side is female. Add to that that we lack the kind of in-group bias that women have, and you get the gynocentrism that we are all used too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 04:31 PM
86

"I am pretty sure that is not equality." Lmao. Sexist, idiotic pos.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 02:40 PM
11

Have you seen the others? More seriously, for many Feminists she is already "conceding" a lot with her positions (e.g. look at the word "required" there). So they think they can use her to look better to unbelievers, while often being unaware of how extreme their religion appears to outsiders to begin with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 02:04 PM
1

No. Most people here don’t believe the concept of patriarchy. I wonder if the people who upvoted his comment even really read it. Many probably did not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 10:26 AM
2

Frankly speaking, it would belong further up. Not on the female side. Loyal etc too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/22 06:40 AM
14

All of what that user above wrote was already the case before Feminism was even a thing. A significant amount of men furthermore do not give a fuck about Feminism. But they care about what many women find attractive and important, and they care about being shamed and attacked by them and by other men. Feminism is just the consequent political extension of primitive human tendencies that were always (and still are) a huge part of most cultures.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 11:23 PM
15

You mean women in general, and even many other men. Not just Feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 11:01 PM
6

The “vocal minority” Is so powerful because the majority of people, especially women, is sexist against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 10:58 PM
27

Feminism is one of the most disgusting, immoral ideologies to ever have existed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 08:42 AM
17

This is one of the most disgusting things I have ever read.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 08:40 AM
4

I have been told by some women they would just hit men if they could. The high amounts of social violence they, as a group, tend to engage in should also be quite telling as to whether women really harbor less "violent" intent than men. So the high amounts of DV among lesbian couples, that are generally more matched physically than heterosexual couples, does not surprise me at all. And btw being less violent physically only because you are literally weak is not virtuous at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 05:48 AM
3

Overall? Being a male means you are generally disadvantaged where I live.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 05:42 AM
8

See I'd probably agree with you there, but I heavily suspect that a frightening number of people will say "yes". Those people who just say yes to that out themselves as immoral nutjobs. Only other radicals would agree with something like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 05:33 AM
8

Women's in-group bias might be easily explained if one considers them to see the world in this sex-segregated way. Before anything else, a man is first a "man". Lots of toxic female behavior makes sense if one considers it coming from such a position.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 05:29 AM
1

if this is how people (primarily women) respond? There is some truth "hidden" behind this that you will not be able to state openly without enormous backlash anytime soon. But without that truth being known and people being ready to accept it working on such issues might turn out to be very difficult.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 05:19 AM
21

One of the real powerful things that pickup artist snake oil provides While there is some amount of trash out there, lots of outdated, age specific and culture specific stuff too, the truth is a lot of the stuff preached especially back then easily works. Probably because humans are, as a group, clearly predictable in certain ways. I also find it quite telling that advice for males with regards to dating is maligned so much, and that its usefulness is played down so much, when women's and girl's…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 05:58 AM
6

Given the way Feminists see the world their behavior easily follows. For them such power structures are not just how the world works, but how the world has to work. So they aim to be and stay as powerful as possible a part of them, always trying to defend and expand their position by all means, including straight up denying being powerful etc etc and pointing fingers at others. Those two tactics in particular are especially important for them now given the rhetorical means by which they gained l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 07:46 AM
16

Would not be surprised if she actually raped a man (or boy) in the past.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 07:41 AM
6

If they have access to some of the best minds, information, and money, why would the research be in anyway shoddy? Incredibly naive. Often many of the "best minds" are not that great anyways, and ideology and politics always have a strong influence on what is done and said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 06:05 AM
11

“Men who are accused of sexual misconduct shouldn’t be entitled to due process Feminist agenda was always regressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 06:03 AM
3

Reminds me of theocratic shitholes, past and present.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 06:02 AM
5

Afaik most women, whether Feminist or not, are unwilling to date bisexual men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 05:54 AM
4

Wow. Did not know about this, truly disgusting!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 05:41 AM
23

Being a male advocate has gotten me laid with women several times. Lmao. How?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 05:39 AM
2

If comedians what comedy to be depoliticized, they need to stop interjecting their politics. Generally they only say this temporarily when stuff goes wrong for them. I.e. it is not a stance they really believe in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 03:15 AM
7

or site doesn't think her trans man friends are real men When one reads enough stuff that such people write it quickly becomes obvious that the easiest explanation for the obviously incoherent parts of such people's drivel is that their actual beliefs on gender and sex are not much different than those of tradcons, with the main differences being that they care even more about women and are outright female supremacists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 03:08 AM
9

and they're allowed to make their opinions seem like they're at least someone mainstream Because they are, in Western countries. Power is virtually the only thing that matters for the question of whether someone gets heard and whether or how they can be discriminated against. Feminism is a powerful part of the establishment, the real life "counterpart" to the fantasy construct called "patriarchy", and as far as mainstream culture goes, there probably was never a long time where misandry was not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 03:00 AM
6

What a ridiculous joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 02:52 AM
39

He is morally disgusting trash. Also, his statement shows how privileged he is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 03:26 AM
2

Males low in benevolent sexism are judged similarly to males high in hostile sexism. When coming from a woman this sounds a lot like entitlement. Probably because it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 01:16 AM
38

working yourself to death to be a strong and useful provider is toxic masculinity... Did not see Feminists complain about this much at all or call it out as toxic. Or rather, the only time they seem to apply this phrase to such behavior is when men bring up facts like their lower life expectancy. So basically as a way to dismiss such facts via victim blaming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/22 02:28 AM
10

One look at what women openly fantasize about will tell you that there are indeed many women who are strongly attracted to dark triad traits themselves and many more who at least do not mind the resulting behaviors, who even mind them less than "excessive" niceness or kindness (in a romantic partner). Which makes sense, from an evolutionary perspective. Those traits can benefit their offspring a lot, both directly and indirectly. Even when you see comparatively sexually successful short and/or o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/22 03:24 AM
8

Well, most people would generally agree that if you're only doing something to get recognition, or something else out of it, that makes you an asshole, and that a truly good person does something because they genuinely want to. This is extremely naive. To just take this narrative and believe in it like that. What do you expect people to say openly when others can use it against them and they have no reason to voice such opinions to begin with? Especially given that society, and many of those ind…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/22 03:06 AM
3

"taking what you can get". (even if that isn't true - FWIW I wouldn't advise "taking what you can get", If somebody is older and has virtually no relationship etc experience they absolutely should build that up by "taking what they can get". At least for the time being. By doing what you advise we get to situations like 30 % plus of this or that older male demographic in some countries being without any romantic experience with the other sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/22 01:55 AM
4

It is not odd at all. The former are worthless to them and at best a neutral nuisance with the potential to act against their interests, so for Feminists it would be better they would not exist at all, and the latter are not providing stuff for women and are not playing into their social dynamics while also modeling these "refusals" for other men. Which directly reduces "female" and feminist "social power".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/22 01:48 AM
19

Despite the fact that all the wife did was point out that the woman was sitting alone at the bus stop, I don’t know how she goes and completely ignores the fact that a man was the one who did literally all of the work and was the only one putting themselves at risk for her safety. Entitlement. I noticed many women from English speaking countries seem to be extremely entitled. And even when I was young, I noticed that for example many American men seem to literally brainlessly worship women just …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/22 01:40 AM
12

Not that I'm saying its about getting recognition or anything Why would it not be though? Why should you just do things like this completely for free (not that some cheap verbal praise is worth much anyways)? Do women generally do anything comparable for random men? There is a lot of conditioning around that men have to provide stuff for free to be "good" etc, meanwhile a minority of men and the majority of women just move on almost completely focusing on their own self-interest and those people…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/22 01:38 AM
12

He didn’t decide on his own lol. He could have just refused.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/22 01:24 AM
23

From the same group that will tell you to your face that equal rights isn't a zero sum game! They say this while knowing that they are not going for equal rights to begin with. It is just another way for such people to be deceptive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/22 11:56 PM
65

Lmao at his bullshit about women being "peacemakers".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 01:32 PM
4

I would not be surprised at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/21 01:52 PM
2

We could start "arguing" about this (it being a MUCH bigger factor), and frankly speaking aside from how ridiculous this matter is to begin with (especially given that most "brown people" in the UK that those right-wingers complain about are there because of their own policies and colonial history which they love "to blame" the EU for too), to really ascertain how important what was I would have to do some research. But there is no doubt at all that there are many English people who hate people …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/21 09:46 PM
4

I am white myself. I am not racist against whites. And what I said is based on my own experiences with many English people (not just men btw). Not all of them are like this, of course, but many of the white men complaining about the treatment of white men in spaces like this here indeed are (regardless of nationality). E.g. you wrote about how it is not wrong to say that Indians breed like rabbits and defended Churchill's genocidal actions in your comment history, how there is no additional harm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/21 08:59 PM
26

I saw menslib threads that were full of racism against Indian men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/21 03:33 PM
5

As a fellow white man I find it funny btw how many white men evidently have no issue with this happening since forever to people of rarer phenotypes (i.e. I am talking especially also about other whites), but the moment it happens to them too, in a much milder form, many of them start crying about it. Pretty hypocritical and weak imo and something those people should reflect on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/21 03:31 PM
9

The UK is extremely gynocentric. Fits that it is pretty racist too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/21 03:32 PM
10

Just wow. Julia will be published after Granta releases Newman’s new novel The Men – in which every single person with a Y chromosome vanishes from the world Very Naziesque. Described as "a dazzling, mind-bending novel of feminist utopias and impossible choices", the novel explores a world where men vanish from the world. The synopsis explains: "Set in a world in which men – all men – suddenly and inexplicably disappear from the face of the earth, The Men follows a group of grieving women determ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/21 03:18 AM
5

it feels like a weird lack of focus on the pain the men experienced, rather more focused on the medicine and art parts, or how their loved ones felt, rather than what young men themselves had to endure. I noticed stuff like this often when similar topics came up in articles I read that were written by women. Those writers at least probably just have less empathy for males (yes, including boys).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/21 06:01 AM
3

The weakspot of most men is political naivety. Most Feminists do not give a fuck about whether traditionalists really benefit men, they just care about what claiming that can do for their own interests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 05:43 AM
2

Reminds me of old dictionaries which were still written from a Christian perspective. There the atheists and agnostics were portrayed as a deviant weirdos in denial.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/21 03:55 PM
2

In line with that, MGM in places like the US is clearly gendered violence. Or rather, basically everywhere in the West.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/21 03:53 PM
18

For conservative leaderships men are at best dumb but useful tools.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 04:56 AM
2

One of the most recent ones penalizes “any form of psychological damage to a woman that might endanger her development”. "I think we should break up". "OFF TO THE JAIL WITH YOU!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 04:49 AM
1

radical misandrist Dr Charlotte Proudman Lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 04:43 AM
1

Maybe his status could help protect him, but there are probably unattractive women around that would resent him for presumably not dating women like them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 04:42 AM
2

She is mentally-ill trash. Disgusting that people like her are in positions of power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 04:36 AM
3

Well, I do not know how you conceptualize the term "rape culture", and I also do not know what state my comment was in when you read it, but I think some of the things I mentioned provide a lot of ammunition for making a case that "rape culture" can be a thing (e.g. my last paragraph). And that it exists to some extend in the West, partially furthered by Feminism (and tradcon bs too; e.g. basically most of my comment). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_culture Rape culture is a sociological the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 04:08 AM
9

and radical feminists always like to brush aside the fact female rapists exist in much higher numbers than many believe or realize. This is not restricted to radical Feminists at all. The vast majority of Feminists do this, and they also very often downplay the severity of FOM rape specifically and female perpetrated "sexual misconduct" generally whenever such things come up somewhere. at one point uses the BS "rape culture" term My first thought here was that one could apply this term "fruitful…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 03:01 AM
11

Hmm. I really do not believe that this is going to happen anytime soon. Especially if history is anything to go by here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 03:49 AM
38

Disgusting but very predictable. Clearly, it is pretty obvious which sex is more privileged. Edit: One of the people with knowledge of the move said the provision was stripped as a tradeoff so Republicans would accept reforms to the military justice system regarding how sexual assault cases are handled. Lmao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 01:52 AM
1

What an absolute bellend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/21 05:16 AM
2

Why would you think it is subconscious? And not a deliberate attempt by "liberal elites" and other groups that join in because they stand to profit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/21 07:27 AM
2

Predictably removed. Still, it seems like maybe younger people are going to be more egalitarian than prior generations. That'd be good news
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/21 07:24 AM
1

So far, the arguments I've seen forwarded in favour of why race is socially constructed are all variations on the continuum fallacy. It's basically arguing that that two states or conditions cannot be considered distinct (or do not exist at all) because between them there exists a continuum of states. I love it when people misapply their half-knowledge of fallacies. Our point is not that you cannot consider this or that state distinct if you want to, but that the criteria you use to choose among…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 07:24 AM
2

Actually, no. It's not. You keep diverting the conversation to "genetically meaningful" I literally did not do that. You only noticed what I wrote now after I pointed out that you were in fact -ironically- strawmanning me while accusing me of strawmanning you. when the argument is about whether there are genetic distinctions between races in the first place. Between what races? Nobody ever established proper "racial categories" within homo sapiens based on actual biological reality. The social c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 02:09 AM
1

You seem to be attacking some imagined strawman of my point where you think I believe that everyone with a certain skin colour is genetically identical. Ironically this itself is a strawman. And it is the second time you put it up. I don't know if you realise just how much you've failed to address anything at all I've said You: Uhhh, where's the racism? Me: Believing in races like you do is race realism. That is racist already, especially when combined with prejudices about the alleged genetical…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 01:42 AM
0

Just that race does indeed have something to do with biology. Social racial categories are not founded on anything genetically meaningful. Races in the sense that most racists believe in do not exist. where's the racism Believing in races like you do is race realism. That is racist already, especially when combined with prejudices about the alleged genetically inherent abilities of this or that group. assumed to be Anglo or white despite being not. I never claimed that you are White. I even look…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 01:36 AM
-1

Nah, the idea that all people with this or that skin color are soooo meaningfully genetically similar is what is actually ridiculous. Fits with people up-voting claims about how e.g. Germans are Eastern European. Pfft. Incredibly bizarre, the racism of Anglos.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 01:23 AM
0

From my experience, the term "Eastern European" is fairly commonly used to refer to the communist and/or former communist bloc of countries in that region of Europe, or which East Germany was one. You said Germany and not East Germany, and described the German population as Eastern European, putting it into the same group as Russians. The modern German state itself is the successor of West Germany and not of the DDR. Geographically Germany is in central Europe, culturally it is Central and Weste…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 01:08 AM
-1

The term "Caucasian" is just an inexact shorthand for the group to which I belong, and it was only used for simple and quick communication. If we forget that shorthand and spell it out in specific detail, well, the group lineage to which I am referring is the population that has fair to light skin (commonly called "White") of European descent (a large representation from Scotland, Ireland, and the surrounding regions). For the particular studies that I am referencing in my comment, you can also …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 12:37 AM
3

There's a line I've given about this before: "If race isn't real, the KKK didn't commit any hate crimes." We can certainly still call them murderers, but if there is no race then how we can we identify them as targeting people of a different race? By admitting that people can believe in the existence of something that has no physical reality in the way they think it does and that they can still just act according to their beliefs. One can target people based on this or that visually apparent tra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 12:17 AM
2

By pretending race isn't real we've made ourselves unable to understand racism and xenophobia and fight their causes effectively. So you are a race realist? You think there are human races that can be called e.g. "Blacks" or "Asians", in accordance with pop culture conceptions? Edit: Races aren't, but haplogroups are, and they are pretty much the same thing ***** *****. Yeah, they are not. Maybe you should educate yourself before claiming stuff like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 12:07 AM
0

Like any good SJW I always sung to the choir: gender is a construct, race isn't real, misoginy is everywhere, all cultures are equal, meat is murder, renewables will save the world, delenda carthago. Honestly this sounds like something a right-winger would claim SJW believe. The majority of them are proud meat eaters btw. They are obsessed with "race", and they certainly do not act like all cultures are equal, which I also have virtually never heard from any of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 12:03 AM
6

Funny how virtually no female feminists call out bullshit like this. Nor do they criticize women who support such statements.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/21 11:32 PM
4

reddit "anti-evil." What a joke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/21 04:14 PM
4

More like US-centric. This idiotic hyperfocus on skin color is more of an American thing. The same goes for moronic "redefinitions" of "racism".
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:11 PM
20

Lmao at this retarded bullshit. Whatever. The West is going to become ever less important anyways.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 04:49 AM
20

Wow, what an idiotic bitch.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/21 03:25 AM
3

Stfu with this bullshit. In this context his mother does not deserve respect.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 01:57 AM
3

Blablabla. Get some fucking empathy. Also quite telling how you only criticize OP with all your comments in this thread. Fucking sexist pos.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 01:53 AM
3

So much empathy. How about you move out of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 01:52 AM
11

Your stupidity is pretty ruthless. Fucking garbage level troll.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 04:32 PM
217

I used to think women were mostly innocent Women are on average way more socially astute, self-focused and ruthless than men. Combine this with such perceptions (i.e. "women are mostly innocent" etc) caused by cultural conditioning, hard-wired in-born biases in men's brains and most women's neotenous appearances etc etc and you can see why as a group they outplay men so easily. Another big factor is that not only do women have sisterhood-like automatic self-sex favoring behaviors in ways that me…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 10:25 AM
3

Lmao.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:36 PM
7

Wow, what a disgusting pos.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 05:46 AM
1

I would like your opinion was having a discussion with someone who said removing a condom without a woman’s knowledge is rape. So I posed this question and they wouldn’t answer. Lmao. So predictable.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 05:30 AM
6

Good for them.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:56 AM
1

Annoying bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 04:56 AM
23

It is also funny how the reverse of that situation (i.e. a better educated higher status man choosing an "inferior" woman) is generally seen as normal and not often questioned.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 10:10 PM
109

Meaning they are not opposed to it at some point in the future. They are probably just being "political" about it.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 10:02 PM
1

Exactly Yeah, that is not what you wrote, in the comment I replied to. No need to pretend otherwise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/21 02:40 PM
4

But due to culture I feel it shall go nowhere. The best I can do is lobby for each child to be circumcised with an anaesthetic Wtf. Pretty sure you would not be like this in the face of female circumcision. The same way that female support for such a practice did not impact your mind like male support for MGM evidently does. I also wonder if that is really the only factor at play here... Anyways, you got so many good replies here and in that other thread. Really seems to me like, also given how …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/21 10:37 PM
11

I once saw a study claim that most proponents of FGM are women. Edit: Iirc husbands of such women were even quoted complaining about the effects that FGM had on their sex lives.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:28 PM
28

Men are generally taught that women are just automatically more valuable, worthy of protection, etc etc than men. Trust me these women wouldn’t do the same for you. !!!!!!
/r/MensRights10/10/21 09:06 PM
10

and "the future is female" is bad The "future is female" is a sexist slogan.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:56 PM
10

Whenever I bring this up the local men tell me MGM is okay and it doesn't mean anything bad is happening to men. And I don't know what to think anymore. Did you read any of the relevant research? And would women saying something like that about FGM impact your mind similarly?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:48 PM
2

It has nothing to do with the “burka” that was a figure of speech. Good thing that I wrote about more than just that. Very good thing. Just admit you do not know what you are talking about and that I predicted your behavior perfectly, including calling your obvious lie further above. And if you are “Muslim” but more German than you that shows a quite poor understanding of your religion. Did you have a stroke? Also, btw it makes a lot of sense to read before replying and furthermore learning how …
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:47 PM
1

Feminists created common-law relationships, for the purpose of 'helping women' Any good sources for this?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:28 PM
5

is indicative of the terrible way people's mentalities are heading. You think people in the past were any better? Many people were always like this virtually everywhere, culture just moderates against which groups such inclinations can be openly shown. And misandry itself, well, when was that supposedly not common?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:49 PM
0

Yeah, calling me a liar is a great way to start a conversation. I have bad experiences with Anglo conservatives lying about these things. They generally have zero issues with bluntly lying and acting in bad faith in general. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/how-the-science-of-blue-lies-may-explain-trumps-support/ Probably somewhat relevant. I know that Muslim women are no pushovers (I assume that’s what the fancy jargon ‘gynocentric’ refers to) It is not fancy jargon. It is a legi…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:24 PM
1

I doubt it. You are from the US. There are not many Muslims in the US, and the vast majority of them does not fit your propaganda based view of Muslims. Meanwhile, where I live, there are a shit ton of Muslims, and they tend to be silly simps and their cultures are very gynocentric too. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45112792 You can ignore the British estimates if you want, due to the issues mentioned, though they fit well with what we know from the rest of Europe (some of which I also quoted). Su…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:40 PM
-4

Do you know many Muslims personally?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:25 PM
1

Saying all feminist are man haters, looking to throw every man in jail is like saying all men are rapists. Feminism is an ideology based on man-hating and a Feminist has actively chosen this ideology. Your comparison is bs and conflates two very different things. Btw do you identify as Feminist?
/r/MensRights09/10/21 12:36 PM
15

Be wary of confirmation bias. The irony.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:40 PM
200

These comments from an article about drafting women that was posted here a few days ago seem relevant: Should apply Affirmative Action and draft 10 times as many women as men to make up for the years they were denied participation. And: Wouldn’t true equity first require 80 years of only requiring women to register for and be subjected to forced military conscription? Anyways. Most women probably never wanted true equality, and also probably did not even bother to really think about what true eq…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:24 PM
3

I am just saying they personally get something out of it, reliably.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:01 PM
0

Nothing I said here was wrong and you already have proven my point multiple times. You are free to leave now. Edit: Calls people snowflakes, thinks conservatives are treated like terrorists because others merely do not like their opinions, wants to boycott James Bond because a non white or non British person might play the mc, throws around the n-word while spouting bs about how others are not examples of behavior to be followed, and thinks he is better than others "like a zen monk" for not havi…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 06:26 PM
9

Saying that Indians love male children so much that have killed many female children. now the problem with this is that this is a very old yet true thing but also this used to happen in small region compared to how big India was. The opposite was common too in many parts of the world, but nobody cares.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:34 PM
5

People who do it for attention are more likely to survive obviously. They are also more likely to be repeat "offenders" while those who actually want to die and succeed obviously cannot do it again. There are politically motivated studies out there which ignore these basic facts and try to make it look like this issue is actually gendered in a way that translates to "women most affected". That is where numbers like those cited by that girl come from.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 04:54 PM
0

a predisposition towards grievance. You have a predisposition towards undeserved auto-fellation, shallow thinking and bad rhetorics. Also funny that you say this while whining online about the treatment of heterosexual men compared to... indigenous women and lgbt people. Lmao. Most of modern conservatism is filled to the brim with grievance based whining and most conservatives have a predisposition towards grievance. That is also why they elect people like Trump, who love to whine just like them…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 04:30 PM
0

I'm not sure what to tell you This is not about me. This is about the ridiculous hypocrisy of most people. Most people are weak and fragile but like to preach r/thanksiamcured level bs. The fix isn't to make the world adapt to your shortness Strange that many groups actually managed to make discrimination against them less socially acceptable. Strange. Lastly, what you are talking about is not a fix. It is just coping more or less successfully. Like I say, we ALL have our crosses to bear, even t…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 04:18 PM
5

Still, I have seen women spout racist bullshit that men would not have gotten away with in my experience. People are more lenient towards women. One can even go online and voice some more controversial opinions, preferably those one got in trouble for before, and pretend to be a woman. Then you will get a taste of how massively differently you are treated based on your sex alone.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 04:11 PM
2

Well, he or she never gets banned and they get lots of attention here.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 04:08 PM
6

Straight women are not a minority compared to men. They hold more power as a group too. Think of it as the oppressors (men) being a bully and the minority (women) being the victim. If the victim was to insult the bully it wouldn't really do anything. Actually, people like you are empathy-less, mentally ill bullies.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:59 PM
5

I hope this spreads further.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:54 PM
4

General disrespect and the social acceptance of mockery for this trait while other comparable traits (and even stuff like fatness lol) are not open for socially accepted mockery are what is annoying many people who bring this up.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:46 PM
0

Perhaps if we focused a little more on resilience Funny how this position is often held by people who never face significant discrimination. People who, the moment they have to have some themselves, show how very fragile they are (cause they obviously generally have no adaptions for such things). Not saying this is necessarily the case for you, of course.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:40 PM
5

Double standards are very annoying.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:38 PM
3

Most of your "jokes" about this are not even funny. They are extremely lame and uncreative. And most of you people would bitch if somebody would shame you similarly, but you are just lucky enough not to have to face this kind of stuff. Also funny how many of the people making short men jokes on this subreddit are likely to whine about how the media portrays men (including you specifically pfft). We get lots of such threads on this subreddit. Really lmao.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:35 PM
16

It's a methematic fact. Fits that you spell it that way, lmao.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:54 PM
14

It was not the prime minister who made that mistake. Pretty sure he would be very unlikely to make that kind of mistake.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:41 PM
94

Goes to show how gynocentric the UK is. Because of the hyperfocus on misogyny stuff like this, where somebody accidentally says misogyny instead of sexism, happens.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 11:56 AM
74

I don't know if I should read anything into the use of the word "rape" for girls and "forced [...] to have sex" for boys. Either they minimize what happened on purpose or their biases are showing, neither of which says anything good about the author of that article. Edit. But really, looking at the article now: Nuns Raped Girls With Crucifixes as Female Pedophilia Was Covered Up by the Church Is the headline. Then the female author wrote: While 80 percent of the victims were young boys between t…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 12:45 AM
4

the average height of an adult male is 173 cm or 5'6. 173 cm is 5'8''. For the global average of adult males I have seen mostly numbers between 170cm to 173 cm (5'7'' to 5'8'').
/r/MensRights05/10/21 11:50 PM
-1

Lmao at your weird trolling. Stuff like this is why people all over the world think Americans are idiots. Anyways, thank you for your service, lol.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:31 PM
-1

Your abstract blablabla got the response it deserved, just like your first low effort reply.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:16 PM
-2

You do not even have a right not to be murdered by the government in the US. Lmao. Also nice abstract blablabla, proving my point.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:11 PM
0

What is not really wrong? That Europeans have no rights? That's just some provincial bs uneducated Americans spout. Americans better should take a look at their pseudo-democratic police state before pointing fingers at others.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:07 PM
1

You noticed I was not talking about the US alone? In most of Europe for example 5'8'' is indeed short. And here where I live in Germany even 5'9'' is noticeably short.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:05 PM
7

In my experience many women often behave downright nasty towards other women who do not fit in or agree with them, which is why many women do not speak up when their female friends spout bs etc about groups they themselves do not belong to even if they themselves disagree with said bs or find it morally repugnant etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 05:06 PM
4

At this point I really dont think its much of an exaggeration to say that wokism is like a cult. For many people this is the replacement of the Christian bs their ancestors believed in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 05:04 PM
7

Seems like an elementary mistake, but then again, nobody ever accused feminists of being intelligent. It should be pretty obvious that the vast majority of them does this on purpose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 05:02 PM
5

Wow. How ridiculous, but also very telling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 04:57 PM
6

This ridiculous bullshit never seems to end.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:41 PM
8

If it was the other way around people would screech about rape culture.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:39 PM
0

But thats europe so they don't have any rights /r/ShitAmericansSay.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:36 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:33 PM
6

Fucking brainlet.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:32 PM
2

It is short in most developed countries and bigger cities in the first world.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:26 PM
8

More like 12-18 %, last time I checked your average male height was between 5.10 and 5'11. No need to exaggerate.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:25 PM
1

Why put the blame for his bs onto short dudes? He probably is tallish, maybe not as tall as he claims to be, but whatever.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:22 PM
1

In most of Europe the majority of women would find him too short.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:22 PM
2

It exists here in Germany too. From what I heard it is not much different in most other developed places. Any women above with that type of judgement is a bullet dodge, particularly if they're still thinking the same shit in their late 20s. If she (allegedly) changes her opinion only by then short men should avoid her.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:17 PM
2

"I want a guy to spend money on me, but that sounds selfish, so instead I'll claim that its all about effort." I dont think that women are consciously thinking those thoughts, but I think its what going on in their subconscious mind. What you are doing here might be politically correct, but just for the record, many many of these women actually consciously think this. They are not extremely stupid or totally lacking in self-awareness. They know what they are doing. And the narrative and facade t…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:43 AM
1

Lol at the men who upvoted her. The simpiness and naivite are strong here.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:34 AM
8

Lots of toxic femininity there.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:11 AM
4

(not that that’s necessarily bad.) Never seen something like this without it being extremely sexist though. Just an observation.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:10 AM
131

These comments were pretty funny: Should apply Affirmative Action and draft 10 times as many women as men to make up for the years they were denied participation. And: Wouldn’t true equity first require 80 years of only requiring women to register for and be subjected to forced military conscription?
/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:22 PM
28

Dude is literally a Feminist writing troll responses.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 11:26 AM
1

You mean like the right not be murdered or something? Literally having a right to live otherwise entails some form of universal healthcare.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 11:16 AM
0

My bad then. As a lot of other people were able to see, I wasn't being an asshole. When I wrote my second reply your reply to my reply had many more upvotes than my reply, which makes sense if at least some of the people that upvoted it also thought you were "correcting" me. Because you included people younger than 30 I thought maybe you were thinking that the same pattern I brought up would also just "obviously" favor those 30 year old men. Furthermore, given female nature it is not like many o…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 11:05 AM
0

What do you consider a human right then?
/r/MensRights04/10/21 12:52 AM
12

Goes to show what men can achieve if they actually stop taking all this bullshit! Western men should follow suit.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/21 12:44 AM
-5

It makes perfect sense to assume that many of those women -especially those in their late 30ies- are with better established, wealthier older men. Meanwhile the men of their generation, due to the economic situation in Korea, are generally not attractive to younger women in that way. Also no need to be a rude asshole. Especially given that it is you who is actually the idiot here with your total non-sequitur further above.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 11:19 PM
2

A good father loves the mother first. No, a good father cares more about the child than about the mother. He's a shitty father and a shitty person. And that woman is a shitty mother and a shitty person.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:33 PM
0

Let’s not assume it’s for malicious intentions. Yeah no. Sexist bullshit. Maybe she truly believes he will not be a good fit? Not up to her to decide. Plus she already made clear she is doing it out of revenge.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:31 PM
-1

Would you say the same if a man were to do something like this? Obviously not. Lmao at your sexist bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:29 PM
34

Women in their 30ies might also just be with significantly older men. Some might also be with other women.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:18 PM
2

Lmao.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 08:06 AM
3

However I noticed that this tends to be put on men by other men at times. Although women can do it to, Almost makes it sounds as if it was not overwhelmingly done by women.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 08:00 AM
6

Some people in the best of legal advice subreddit pointed out some decent evidence indicating that the post itself is creative fiction. But the reactions of the mod, and of the other people "supporting" that user, are real and quite telling.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 08:28 PM
1

She only said she does not want to kill all men. That does not mean that you get to live.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 06:58 PM
4

Take your concern trolling elsewhere.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 06:43 PM
13

Wow, that mod there is literally human trash. Fucking disgusting pos. Edit. To quote the mod: Hello OP, I am sorry but I have to lock your post as about 90% of the moderation we have had to do this last hour has been associated with off-topic and really shitty comments in this discussion, and there's really no more legal information that we can give you. I am worried that the flood of nonsense garbage MRA sewage is flowing now, and it never gets better from that point. Best of luck to you. And: …
/r/MensRights02/10/21 06:08 PM
5

Women want us to open up and let our emotions out. But as soon you do it, you are considered "girly" and weak (so I was told by feminists lmao). They are generally just lying and this kind of behavior is just classical emotional abuse.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:36 PM
3

They do a lot to enable them, that is for sure.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:25 PM
2

It is not just feminism at fault here. Lots of normal misandric sexism is also playing into this. That stuff also needs to be criticized and fought.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:23 PM
2

Comment is still there Many of your comments in this thread have been removed. Most likely by you, because they are not on your userpage. That much is pretty obvious. Yep, it is still a moronic view you have. No, and one can say a lot about my views, but they are massively less moronic than yours. And cheap rhetoric like that cannot change that obvious fact.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:15 PM
3

If women join the draft I can guarantee they won't be put into combat roles unless voluntary, You cannot guarantee shit. If the laws are changed accordingly women will be put into combat roles. Regardless of what you want or not. The same way many men who have been drafted did not want to be there, and people had to work with people and groups they did not like. I still stand by that! That is why you courageously deleted your comment. In any case it has shown us how you think that men's lives ar…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:11 PM
2

She cannot even read out the drivel she wrote properly.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 09:16 PM
5

More seriously if it came down to it I do suppose women would be drafted mostly in non-physical roles. One can make use of quotas to ensure that women are equally disposable. I.e. one can make sure that non-physical roles are not dominated by them. And even if they were only drafted for other roles when a huge amount of manpower is finally needed, that would be a more equal situation than now. Plus, requiring women to register makes it more likely that the draft gets abolished and that various p…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 09:04 PM
3

This is a sideshow - it's posturing, not anything that is likely to matter in our lifetime. I already have shown you that more than 1 million men right now are being deprived of various benefits because they failed to register for the selective service. That alone makes it matter all by itself. And equality before the law is an ethical end-in-itself anyways. The U.S. government doesn't draft people anymore Unless there is a big war with China and co. Easily possible. Then the stuff you mentioned…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 08:08 PM
5

Or getting rid of an unjust and obsolete system would achieve more equality. But you don't care do you? There are times when a draft is necessary. And if men have to die to be able to vote, so should women. Even if the draft gets abolished later, once shit hits the fan, the government will look at what it had before and revive it (maybe with minor revisions). Better make sure such a draft is most likely going to be egalitarian. Also, to use your language, let's be real: Without including women i…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 04:35 PM
47

Plenty of Feminist randoms and women online support MGM because it fits their preferences. Imagine being this entitled, that you speak publicly in favor of MGM because you think that any man regardless of his own thoughts, regardless of his actual sexual orientation and inclinations etc etc etc should be mutilated just to fit your preferences. And huge amounts of people, including those purportedly deriving their demands etc from supposedly universal moral principles that would clearly apply in …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:55 PM
6

As if the women are taken advantage of and they got pregnant because they had no idea what was going on... Plenty of female soldiers even actively try to get pregnant to avoid having to go into combat zones. This is a well-known thing. And yeah, putting all the responsibility for pregnancies in general onto men alone is anti-egalitarian regressive bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:51 PM
1

We sure won't invade their mainland or any traditional style war, unless we want to get our asses kicked. Yeah, but large amounts of soldiers might be used to prevent them from bringing other places into their possession, e.g. to prevent them from conquering Taiwan. Depending on how such a conflict goes more battlefields might open up, and that can ultimately lead to a draft being enacted.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:48 PM
12

I'm not sure what she is saying about the 'women' getting pregnant... Given that becoming pregnant is not obligatory and generally a freely made choice based on self-interest and furthermore given the birth rates in most Western countries I find it ridiculous whenever Western Feminists and others bring up this bullshit. Also "funny" how quickly self-proclaimed progressives --not necessarily talking about the woman in that video because I do not know who that is-- bring up conservative arguments …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:38 PM
12

Further above that user wrote: The draft isn't feminists fight. They don't have anything to do with the draft and it doesn't affect women. Why would feminists fight that battle? So even he does not really think they care.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:29 PM
2

I mean since 9/11 the enrollment into military has gone up from patriotic feelings that nowadays they deny you based on insignificant crap, my brother in law had a couple cavities, and one tooth that may need a crown and they sent him on his way... If they didn't draft back then, idk what will That stuff was invasions of weak undeveloped countries with low populations based on false premises involving a huge amount of allied countries partaking. Once a strong power like China makes a move, a dra…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:25 PM
10

I see. You think that because feminists weren't fighting against the draft, that counts as supporting it. That's obviously very flawed logic and just used in bad faith to attack. When you present yourself as being in favor of equality and demand all kinds of quotas for the good stuff then not being against a male only draft is quite telling at least. Not to mention that Feminists shamed little boys and young men into throwing their lives away (white feather campaign). The draft isn't feminists f…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:21 PM
6

Once shit hits the fan and a draft becomes necessary, without having made that clear legally before, only men will have to die on the frontlines. We all knows this. Feminists know this. That is why they do not want to have women be included into a draft. Even if it gets abolished later, including them might set a useful precedent.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:18 PM
3

Yes I don't see what the issue is... so might as well get rid of the dumb bureaucratic process it is. When shit hits the fan a draft might be needed. By then it should have been made clear legally that women ought to serve. Else only men will have to die to maintain a system that clearly disprivileges them.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:14 PM
8

It hasn't even been brought up because the odds of the draft ever being used are close to non existent. This is bullshit. People have been drafted within living memory. The real reason is because nobody cares about men's lives being treated as less valuable than those of women. and I think we need to focus on the matters that affect daily life Having to legally sign away your life just to be able to vote just because you are born with the wrong genitals affects people's life. Not to mention all …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:12 PM
3

If it ever comes to a WWII style war, why passing on body abled men better suited for war for women? You wanna win or what? Women will be more useful staying back home. There are tons of things they can be used for. And more "man"power is better all else being equal. Finally, if you do not want to fulfill this obligation you should not be allowed to vote. Just like men are not. No need to privilege women here. Edit: Lol at your silent downvote. People should speak more about female entitlement a…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:08 PM
2

Actually having a wife, improves psychological and physical health in men. Statistically, married men live longer. You sure this is not just because women select against men who have mental and physical health issues when it comes to marriage? And divorce men who turn out to have such issues, or acquire and "maintain" them for some time? That would explain why the set of married men lives longer etc. Also, iirc, did they even compare this with people in other forms of relationships etc? The last…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:45 PM
12

Stuff like this is so annoying.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 02:34 AM
12

The vast majority of people is currently too primitive not to indulge in this stuff.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:31 AM
6

Rationally speaking this makes a lot of sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/21 02:15 AM
7

Such double standards are alive and well virtually everywhere. Nice to see someone call this out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/21 02:13 AM
4

It is more interesting to consider how all these people who act nice actually think about you, given that many of them might find you repulsive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:51 AM
3

Maybe future life-extension tech, combined with better entertainment options, will be a game changer here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:40 AM
1

Only very few people are in that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:38 AM
1

The same has been done with a similar picture and a bio in which the dude was claimed to have been a convicted pedophile pos.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:27 AM
1

My point is that men that would otherwise be fine irl due to having swagger would do terribly on a dating app. How do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:26 AM
1

Women are attracted more to a mans “aura” and his actions than his static looks. A huge part of anyone's "aura" is their looks. And what is considered acceptable looks depends on what you have been exposed too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:25 AM
1

It was always like that. It's not worse nor has it been better. The pool is way larger, way more is required to belong to the top, including in terms of "uncontrollables".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:24 AM
1

It just is like that. For everyone. Not everyone is a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:21 AM
1

The average life sex partners are 7. You seriously believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:19 AM
1

Interesting. I wonder how much further this can go.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:18 AM
0

What's with dudes on PPD thinking that introverted = completely lacks charisma and is unable to be personable? I see these things conflated so much and it'd shock me if I hadn't been around here for so long. They want to pretend their issues are due to them being introverted, which they first have to redefine appropriately.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:11 AM
1

Tbh that was pretty funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:09 AM
2

they mistakenly think exaggerated hyper masculine features are higher rated Men do this often.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:06 AM
2

yes it does. We don't like things that looks awkwardly fake while trying to pass as real. Lmao. If it was not common dyed blond/e with dark roots would fall into this category. For people who live in places with many natural blond/e people it actually often does look "awkwardly fake while trying to pass as real". False, Google "blonde" and look at their roots If you google this in English an overwhelming amount of results that come up will be people who merely dyed their hair blonde. Furthermore…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:01 AM
2

Something being natural or not has nothing to do with this, especially in countries where there are almost no natural blondes. Furthermore, if someone's roots are dark then they are not blond. What you are talking about is sun bleaching their hair. If there were magically many more blond/e people around who then dye their hair darker you would speedily become used to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:56 AM
3

The main difference is that blonde on brunette roots looks beautiful and natural. If you're blonde dyed brunette, you need to re-dye your hair all the time because it'll look ridiculous once your roots pop out. Nah, you only think so because you are used to one thing and not the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:52 AM
1

Their general judginess is way more annoying and troublesome, and there are some real double standards surrounding this matter that ought to be done away with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:48 AM
1

Because we interact with the men here Triggers the sociopathy. Jk.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:45 AM
1

Aside from that I agree mostly, with this thread's headline.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:37 AM
2

Shy men for sure are repulsive to many women. Though women are pretty easily repulsed anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:34 AM
3

There is a huge difference between being introverted (often liking your own company more than others) and being socially awkward. This gets conflated here on this sub all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:33 AM
1

Did not expect your agreement. Now I am here bored. But ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:30 AM
5

The part you are missing is she doesnt know he is faking it. More like one dude is physically more attractive, and the woman rationalizes his behavior to get with him because of that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:29 AM
2

Accepting dregs and losers assures that standards will never go up Men are not a hive mind. Individual men have to deal with the consequences of that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:27 AM
1

Probably more rewarding for women than for men, and they have to do less to begin with to socially succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:23 AM
18

Iirc Swiss feminists were also against abolishing mandatory military service for males and against including women into said service. They are just selfish, sexist trash.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/21 10:34 PM
1

Seems like as long as we only post pictures of us being above 6ft we do not even have to do anything according to her. What an ugly, retarded sexist pos. Also shows us a lot about the psychology of many women.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 09:17 AM
6

Those sexist people have way too much power.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 06:56 AM
1

She is obviously a person doing some comedic stuff here to get some attention (for her onlyfans or whatever).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 06:32 AM
2

Do you know about the Duluth model and how it causes men to be instantly discriminated by the police in many countries? Even when a woman attacks a man with a weapon the police will most likely jail the man. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/ Mentions many things Feminists have done, e.g (it is about random Feminists committing the no true scotsman fallacy, so the quotes are worded accordingly): You're not Jan Reimer, former mayor o…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 07:24 PM
1

Your assuming men are a singular group, they aren't. Just because a person in power is male does not means they will look out for me or even care about my issues. That men would do this is just female projection. I have a comment further above that contains an analysis of the idea of patriarchy. That comment also links to a comment linking many studies that show that men do not favor other men over women. The opposite is the case.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 07:17 PM
2

I can however, tell you that women voted hitler into power Just chiming in to point out that Hitler was not voted into power. http://factmyth.com/factoids/hitler-was-elected-in-a-democratic-election/ FACT: By July 1933 the Nazi Party was the only legal political party in Germany. If that gives you an idea of how “democratic” 1932’s elections and appointments were. The NAZI party ran in every election of the 1920’s (all fair elections between WWI and WWII), mostly with Hitler as its leader, altho…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 06:26 PM
3

No, the main reason for there being more shelters for women is because homelessness is more dangerous for women due to human trafficking. In many countries you have hundreds ++ of homeless shelters for women and 0-2 or 3 for men. The reason is because nobody gives a shit about men, and especially not about unsuccessful men. And Feminists literally fight against people who want to open shelters for men. Even assuming that you are right about your claim regarding trafficking, this cannot explain t…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 06:09 PM
1

We actually managed to have many achievements in history despite the patriachy There is no such thing. And men have massively more achievements, even nowadays men achieve much more while the educational systems etc in the West massively favor women. We weren't even allowed to vote until recently, etc The same goes for many men, and unlike women, men have to sign away their lives to be allowed to vote. Women just get to vote regardless. How do you know women have a lower IQ? By having read up on …
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 06:00 PM
1

So therefore, results were inconsistent and could not make a conclusion. No. It just means that the studies found differences to different degrees and had different outcomes sometimes, and that those were predictable by the design of the studies and what behaviors they measured (i.e. to what gender role the measured behaviors belonged to etc). They still found that: Results from a meta-analytic review of sex differences in 172 studies (appended) in helping behavior indicate that in general men h…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 05:46 PM
4

They also spend most of the money that is going around. Anybody looking at advertisement can also see how gynocentric lots of it is.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 03:54 PM
2

Her fantasy world never existed in any widespread way. It is incompatible with human nature.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 03:52 PM
3

You do not speak for most women. Only Feminists believe in a patriarchy.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 03:51 PM
3

How about considering this? https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-10139-001 Results from a meta-analytic review of sex differences in 172 studies (appended) in helping behavior indicate that in general men helped more than women and women received more help than men. The second link is an opinion piece that does not prove your point.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 03:46 PM
5

Maybe you should now, that you understand that easy sentence, look at my original comment further above and educate yourself. Because evidently you just ignored virtually all of it. considering also that it was found that women are inherently altruistic. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-10139-001 Results from a meta-analytic review of sex differences in 172 studies (appended) in helping behavior indicate that in general men helped more than women and women received more help than men. Yeah no…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 03:39 PM
13

It is time more people call out this bullshit!
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 02:29 PM
1

If the feminist claims mentioned before are true it must also be true that "men as a group" inherently have a tendency to suppress "women as a group". This is a simplification etc, but it should be good enough. I can assume that it is because there is loads to learn and people are clever not to educate others for free, especially when there is a lot of education to be done. I can assume she was being strategic. She saw that she could not defeat these great points so she made up an excuse and fle…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 02:23 PM
2

the subjugation of women must be in-keeping with mens' inclinations. I'm not sure what this means exactly..? If what was given as Feminist premises before is true, then the subjugation of women must be "in conformance" with men's inclinations / must be in line with "men's tendencies". Btw, thank you for this comment, No problem. I asked another Feminist about this matter but they just said there is nothing to talk about if I question the existence of the patriarchy.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 02:11 PM
3

How about you stop with the personal attacks and start to actually answer our concerns and arguments. E.g. what about my comment further above? For your convenience: https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/pf3fdc/a_question_from_a_femenist_for_all_of_you_so_i/hb1zckw/ Eagerly awaiting your reply.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 01:46 PM
1

Source that most women in the world are Feminists?
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 01:36 PM
5

Patriarchy is a misandrist conspiracy concept. Quoting an insightful comment fully: All Feminism, whether it's radical, intersectional, liberal, moderate, or whatever, is anti-egalitarian, unsubstantiated, and anti-male. All forms of Feminism hold the following premises as self-evident: Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privileges men over women While some men can sometimes be harmed by this system, the system itself is set up to privilege men and subjugate women for mens express benefit.…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 01:28 PM
3

There are plenty of women that do this, just asking normally, at least where I live. But I also know women that are very manipulative with this stuff, making their voices go higher pitched every single time they want something and then once they got it they just go cold, or women who do not stop a single second to say thanks once they got something but who instead just drive away instantly, etc etc.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 01:19 PM
6

Men are inherently self-gratifying as opposed to women which is arguably why capitalism suits them so much. Women do not suit capitalism because we are inherently altruistic. This is just misandric bullshit. in order to benefit us women since capitalism as a whole benefits men more than women.* Proof?
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 01:15 PM
2

Yeah, it is basic manipulation. It is generally not about them trying to not be rude, which can easily be done differently.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 01:04 PM
1

Mostly women in my experience.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 12:41 PM
4

Russia does not even have equality anyways. Only men get drafted etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 12:26 PM
2

To a woman who has been consumed by manosphere To most women, including most Feminists and FDS people (who are certainly not part of the manosphere in any relevant sense). There is no need to always blame men for everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 12:18 PM
3

That is how the vast majority of women thinks. Of course when called out they might claim it is men who really think like that etc, but that is pretty transparent, right? Especially the women here like to deflect and blame the men here etc for whatever opinion they let slip.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 05:57 AM
1

Holy shit. Not bad. This thread is hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 03:58 PM
4

Are you sure you know what an introvert is? Did you ever look this up? Did you ever look this up in connection with Putin? he's a highly skilled, intelligent and functional sociopath. There are many introverts among such people while many extroverts are just blubbering idiots. The guy ride Harleys and Lambos and sport fuck russian models. And kills other rich men on his free time. So? An introvert really? Yes. Like many other leaders, dictators, etc, especially in Northern and Western Europe, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 02:27 PM
6

Women on this subreddit playing semantic games to gaslight men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 05:30 AM
4

But this is what most guys want because it provides a constant supply of sex at a much cheaper rate than buying prostitutes Not necessarily. and, most importantly, it allows a guy to experience love. Lmao at calling this "love" and finding it desirable. Making men put in some work to be attractive, just as most women put in work to be attractive themselves, is a better idea. Unlike men women massively focus on unchangeables. For many men, given today's world, this makes such efforts inefficient …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 05:21 AM
2

Lmao sounds like something taken from an edgy teen manga.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:20 PM
1

Lmao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/21 03:33 PM
–

Ngl that sounds pretty weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:01 PM
–

Lmao. Not bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 11:00 AM
–

I've mostly seen it from men and not women. Just like you me and that other user were going by our personal experiences. Female sexuality is inherently like this anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 10:09 AM
–

There are still lots of commonalities though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 10:02 AM
–

YES!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 09:59 AM
–

With that reasoning we should just abolish Feminist attempts to elevate the social status of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 09:57 AM
–

Tons of women believe in this stuff. Men are less likely to be like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 09:55 AM
–

The pre-modern era was more based on actual performance and different kinds of luck than the mere "looks" aspect of the genetic lottery. That one is much more important nowadays, for men, than ever before. So your comparison does not really fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 09:53 AM
3

but it's annoying to see it only applied to appearance. And even then only for men. That user you mentioned was short etc too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 08:20 AM
3

I know men who admit openly to avoiding short women etc so there is at least some change going on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 08:18 AM
1

It treats women as objects to say that they, as a class, can be relaxed with a flesh light that moans For many men sex is the only reason to seek out women. I think we should talk about what it means that men think its either an improvement or a 1:1 trade. Maybe many women have not much else to offer to the men they choose. It treats women as objects to say that they, as a class Society in general and women especially treat men as mere disposable utilities. It does not get anymore objectifying t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/21 08:07 AM
10

the males who don’t have what it takes to defeat other males and have a harem. . We need introverts, artists and daydreamers too You forgot scientists. Anyways, lmao at Americans and their obsession with painting male introversion as being the same as being weak. Many better functioning societies disagree and in many cultures endlessly blabbering extroverts are just considered silly, weakminded fools. It is laughable to think that you honestly believe introverts cannot be or are very unlikely to…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 08:03 AM
1

After my ex, After turning 30++ you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 07:37 AM
1

Once women hit 30~ they tend to start going for people closer "in value" to themselves. Else they risk ending up alone and/or childless.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 07:24 AM
1

He was probably somewhat above her level, and she is 30 now. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 07:23 AM
1

I make my own money. I am almost 30, but in my twenties I was definitely drawn to the chad type. Again, I do not feel like I was settling with this person. Your age and prior dating life make him the one who would have settled. He properly realized that. Good for him!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 07:22 AM
2

Some do but it’s not something that’s taught? Never hit a woman or girl under any circumstance is not being taught? Girls and women are thereby not taught that they should get away with being violent against males? And the kind of violence that such attitudes beget, which is obviously often a form of abuse, is also virtually everywhere in all kinds of media. Clearly there are forms of abuse that societies in the West teach us are ok or even good, if it is females doing it to males.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 07:13 AM
–

Lmao. Imagine robots telling them they are not actually fat just heavy-boned etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:55 AM
–

This seems to be some kind of new dogma here, that women do not care about what men think. Tons of situations where that is obviously not true, but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:54 AM
–

Look at his user name.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:48 AM
–

The reverse doesn't happen. That depends on where you live and when. After some wars where a huge amount of men died, women often pursue men. That happened e.g. in the Soviet Union after WW2.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:39 AM
7

Some people just always try to find a man to blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:27 AM
5

I'm not asking those here why they wouldn't date a single mom, I am asking what caused this societal shift to occur? Men are becoming more aware of their self-interest. Partially because of the extreme gynocentrism in the West.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 06:18 AM
1

This is how most Feminists think.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 05:50 AM
0

You mean like most entitled women that cannot take it when men defend themselves? And the best thing about your comment is that you probably are an ugly, old, fat bitchlet. Lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 05:29 AM
16

Never got the appeal of pretending that the past was not trash as well.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 05:31 PM
8

Racists tend to be sexist in this very way.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:49 AM
81

Feminists never address things like this when it comes to gender inequality in India.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:48 AM
3

Total bullshit. Only idiotic simps and entitled bitches think like you.
/r/AntiFeminists27/08/21 07:29 PM
1

Those men do not represent most men and do not confer any authority to random men (plus most voters are women). Unlike women men as a group do not have a significant sex-based in-group bias. One could even say, men are less sexist than women. That claim also fits with women and not men generally enforcing male gender roles, even for little boys. They also "slut-shame" more. Maybe Feminism should evolve and stop deifying women and its members should instead look at their own flaws as a group, and…
/r/AntiFeminists27/08/21 06:58 AM
19

You abolish it, and when shit hits the fan, without prior regulations we all know that only men will be drafted and sent to their deaths. And more generally, in many countries having no draft is unrealistic due geopolitics.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:10 AM
30

They probably like this because it advantages women in multiple ways.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 04:19 AM
84

Systemic discrimination. And Feminists evidently do not care.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 04:19 AM
6

I "love" how people like that user never reply to the most salient parts of comments like yours.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 03:30 AM
4

People often have beliefs that allow them to act "pragmatically" without a bad conscience. Euphemistically speaking.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 03:23 AM
12

Universally, man-haters have a legitimate grievance with an individual male. Bullshit. People can be hateful even without anything in particular having happened to them. Just via their own proclivities and maybe some relevant media exposure.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 03:19 AM
13

Typical Feminist bullshit. Also goes to show how privileged women are in the West.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 03:17 AM
2

Lmao. Maybe you should look at how men and women lived back then. Nobody can deny that. One can easily deny that. There is a reason lots of early left-wing stuff included a pro men's rights perspective.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 04:05 PM
3

I don't even think a lot of these women are allowed to even leave the home without permission Oh, you were speaking for Afghani women? Lmao. Yeah no. Do not switch the topic. Aside from that, if they are not fighting but demand that men fight for them, then yes, they are acting entitled. but you expect these women to run away and what, create their own militia? Women can fight too, yes. Why should only men and little boys fight? Women are not worth more than men, despite what some people here be…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:48 PM
7

Yeah. If that was not the case she would most likely have qualified her first comment accordingly.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:41 AM
2

I think the vast majority of those women are disgusting cowards. They ain't ever go and put their asses on the line for anything and yet they are pointing fingers endlessly. Generally many women have ridiculous entitlement issues when it comes to stuff like this. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:40 AM
3

Many education systems see woke doctrines not as politics, just as 'fighting racism, sexism and homophobia to protect human rights'. This is what they do here in Germany. Maybe add: "pretend to see....". The vast majority of the people involved are aware of the fact that they are doing politics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/21 03:12 AM
5

When I was younger and the US invaded Iraq based on false pretenses I quickly noticed how similar both sides were in ranting about "god" and stuff.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:53 AM
6

but I seriously doubt that a very small amount of extra skin on my penis There is nothing "extra" about the foreskin. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pa1ryb/circumcision_is_a_crime_against_humanity_and_a/ha2j70v/
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:16 AM
3

Also funny how you never see many Westerners, especially Feminists, who claim to be about equality and not Female surpremacism, care about boys being raped in Afghanistan. Instead it seems like we are supposed to only care about girls and grown up women.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:13 AM
2

There are different forms of FGM. People who cannot even educate themselves on such matters probably should not procreate.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:58 PM
3

To the point that if it was completely exposed it would be just downright painful and raw all the time. Probably would get desensitized, just like what happens to men. There are proven facts towards what this maladie leads as opposed to circumcision. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pa1ryb/circumcision_is_a_crime_against_humanity_and_a/ha2j70v/ Educate yourself. Just for the record, I chose to ignore some of your bs claims. because I do believe some rights of men are getting trampled…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:54 PM
7

They often think their ******** dicks are superior. Lmao.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:27 PM
0

Yeah, that stuff is some third world shit.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:23 PM
3

Those doctors did their job and aren’t sick. Nah, they are total pieces of shit.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:22 PM
9

Imagine believing this bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:21 PM
3

Many women feel entitled to protection by men who have nothing to do with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/21 01:30 AM
10

"Funny" how the more overt misandry, body-shaming etc are not mentioned in that article. Hypocritical bitches.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 12:30 PM
1

There is also nice stuff like calling in 1000000000 brothers to beat you to a pulp. Where I live there are minorities that act like that from time to time.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:53 PM
1

I don’t think that would be good, but if someone were to try I should be able up defend myself and my family. I agree. Short dudes have a lot of built up resentment. Damn. Lmao. My point is you are romanticizing something you have no clue about. You are pretty naive to boot. People who never lived in harsh environments and who fap to their alleged genetic greatness and how well they would allegedly do when we go back to rawer times, who btw are almost always white middle class softies, just piss…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:46 PM
1

I don’t like this line of thought. It’s not ‘heightism’ it’s biology, instinct, nature. Regarding "heightism" outside of dating: The same can be said about racism. Something being natural does not make it good. Aside from that, yes, short guys should realize how people actually are and adapt accordingly.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:41 PM
1

Amen, and I don’t want there to be. Says the tall guy. Going back to our instincts would mean that a random short guy would just stab you for disrespecting him.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:31 PM
1

If you’re short, that sucks but become strong, social, and intelligent but also understand that you aren’t at the top genetically. Random tall dudes are not at the "top" genetically either. There is a reason women focus way more on leg length in places like the modern West where "natural" selection is less harsh.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:22 PM
1

Nature is good. She’s the great mother. Lmao. No. And going by your logic it would just be perfectly fine for a short dude to murder you, and then rape your wife or girlfriend or daughter. Would be perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:20 PM
1

Women select the best possible mate. Not really. They select tons of trash as long as they have a few key attributes. And sometimes not even that.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 12:19 PM
2

Australia is a misandrist shithole.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:47 AM
7

He is a disgusting sexist pos.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:57 AM
1

I can't speak for the intelligence of the brunettes as they were rarely, if ever, allowed to speak. Hmmm, I seriously doubt that. Still, people should stop spouting off about "dumb blondes" etc. This stuff is not much different from e.g. people talking about "idiotic Indians" whose "average IQ is around 80" (saw that one online recently). Edit: Since so much got edited and then comments got removed arbitrarily. I literally never said this. This: an astrophysics class where the teacher kept hitti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 03:16 AM
0

My guy when people pull out the I'm smarter than you BS card regardless if they are you lose so much credibility Like when you called my ass stupid? Ok. and it turn out that people who hate women I do not hate women though. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:55 AM
0

bro it's people like you that get MRA's such a bad reputation No. what u said ofc I'm gonna downvoted your stupid ass My ass is smarter than yours. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:52 AM
1

kept hitting on the dumb blondes Guess they looked better than the idiotic brunettes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 02:51 AM
-1

Okay then go to Twitter ask her hey did you mean to intentionally write a drug that could be used to rape people? Dude, she literally described how this drug was used to rape someone. That was not an accident. Also, your suggestion is literally idiotic. Furthermore, Rowling is a racist, sexist pos. She is not a good person. and I aknowledge its flaws Sure... lmao at your salty downvote.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:41 AM
1

If you don't want to go through all that, then just shave it. It can be a pain to keep up with but it's a bad ass, confident look. Depends on your skull shape and face.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:32 AM
1

Feminists support shit like this.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:20 AM
0

I feel like Rowling simply overlooked it Nah, she is a rad fem racist with huge double standards. more so just overlooked what she wrote no doubt No, she consciously wrote that. There is no way as a writer that you are not seeing what you are doing when you are doing something like this. No need to rationalize this just because you like the series.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:15 AM
1

Lol at people downvoting this.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:14 AM
17

What a selfish piece of shit. Even the stuff she says now is extremely disgusting. Also, that prosecutor, obviously a biased misandrist woman, is a disgusting pos too.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:45 AM
1

And I said I don’t disagree with your assessment My comment was still under construction. Bad habits, my bad. No need to get worked up over it. Technically there is no need to get "worked up" over anything. I chose to care about this, and there is nothing wrong with that. Also, a quick search about the number of naturally blonde people in the US gave me very conflicting numbers All sources I saw said something like 5-6 percent. That is less than black people, or hispanics. Now look at leftist ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 10:24 PM
2

but white women can definitely get called out for this kind of behavior. Yes. Though it seems to me that they very often get away with it rather easily, or at least get off -especially comparatively- lightly. I also think that tons of generally racist behavior, including remarks about people's appearance, supposed traits etc, can be engaged in by women of all ethnic groups against people of other groups in ways that would get men into trouble way faster. This is not restricted to white women. I …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 09:30 PM
12

I wonder how the situation above is any different from the countless white women who called the police on black guys and got justifiably called out for it Do they really get called out that much for things like this? Tons of women, of all kinds of ethnic backgrounds, seem to easily get away with lots of racist bullshit in ways that men generally do not. How can people be so obliviously to the fact that it’s clearly bigotry? Most people know that it is bigotry, and they do not care. Just consider…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 02:50 PM
2

Dark triad traits definitely attract women. They always did, and barring genetically engineering etc "always" will. History's most successful seducers always had many of these traits. Btw that user wrote: I dont see the trend towards "dark triad traits" being any higher than it used to be. They did not write that those traits do not attract women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/21 12:45 PM
6

You're essentially saying an entire gender are cold hearted Machiavellian robots that merely seek out whatever advantages they can get out of men Women in general have a tendency to be very pragmatic and rather ruthless in their approach to human relations. Tons of women even admit to this, there is tons of research on this you can just google yourself, and tons of thinkers from all cultures and time periods observed this and often complained about it, including even other women (e.g. Florence N…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/21 12:42 PM
2

Holy fuck are those sexist pos disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 02:13 AM
1

They are not necessarily after resources, but rather the primary predictors of resource acquisition. Namely, intelligence and hard work. Lmao. The problem with arguments like these is that they forget the only way to sidestep the repugnant conclusion that women are callously pragmatic "As a group" they clearly are. And not just as extractors of resources. but as far as I'm concerned, trying to sidestep a conclusion as repugnant as this is always a good thing. Is this conclusion really that repug…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/21 01:55 AM
7

Afaik you are not supposed to get one done privately due to privacy issues, but you can go to court and then they will order one for you.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:38 PM
1

Telling a cut guy his penis is smaller and less sensitive is a surefire way to have any self respecting man ignore you and your movement. Sounds more like an oversensitive weakling than a "self-respecting" man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/21 09:55 AM
2

Dude, that extra skin Nothing extra about it. Pfft. The thing is we will never know if a person circ at an extremely young age has less sensitivity then someone who has never been cut because its impossible to ever know. Nonsense. Cutting off all those nerve endings is guaranteed to have a significant impact on your sensitivity. Somebody that actually cares about "scientific fact based evidence" would not deny this. most of the guys who mention the loss of sensation are giving an opinion soon af…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/21 09:54 AM
3

It is important to notice and point out that their disregard is not limited to men, but also includes little boys. Kind of reminds me of "hardcore racists" that I saw have violent fantasies even towards little children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 03:09 PM
2

For many "higher-class" people, and especially for many feminists, lower-class men, low-status men, etc etc are not even "really", "fully" human. They have no issues with almost completely othering and dehumanizing them. It does not even seem that far fetched to see this tendency as being shared by many women in general, with feminism just being the political extension of certain toxic "female" tendencies (that arguably are more or less rooted in our evolutionary past). How is feminism intersect…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 03:04 PM
7

They found that it was about 50/50. About half the time, the father did most of the extra homeschooling, and about half the time the mother did. They then asked both the mother and the father who was doing most of the homeschooling. And around half of all fathers said they were doing most of it, which is what you'd expect. But when you asked the moms, 97% of them claimed that they were doing most of the work. I think one issue here is we don't want to admit how much men do around the house It mi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 02:42 PM
28

Oh yeah, because female privilege does not exist anywhere else and nobody but white people ever did anything bad. Pfft.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:39 PM
12

I noticed this too. Pretty disgusting tbh.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:37 PM
77

It's ridiculous how those selfish those women are, and how little self-awareness they possess to see it. They know exactly what they are doing and how selfish they are. They just do not mind it at all and often even think that people who are not like that are just stupid. Also, and I am not saying that this is necessarily what you are doing, but I noticed that often when bad behavior coming from women is discussed, many men immediately act or talk like said women do not know what they are doing …
/r/MensRights13/06/21 08:46 PM
2

First: the left is always advocating as much equality as possible. If we go by what is called "left" in most English speaking countries then this is clearly not true. They instead focus on boosting certain minority groups only + women to gain power, an aim which is partially helped via the resulting reduction of solidarity within the total population. The left in most European countries is probably not much better. Lots of men are not satisfied with the current situation, but many women aren't e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 07:11 PM
6

That said, we shouldn't push sexist language like "femsplaining". Obviously the term "mansplaining" is sexist and problematic, we shouldn't be doing the same. Depends on whether you are aiming for a trophy in being "moral" or whether you actually want to change things. A big reason why misandry is so mainstream is because nobody fights back in ways that actually impact the other side emotionally. Seems also like a typical male gender role thing to be above this and that instead of striking back …
/r/MensRights31/05/21 07:47 AM
3

Those people are disgusting and most likely mentally ill too.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 06:56 AM
13

Dictionaries just (ideally at least) document the words people use. If more people use "femsplaining" it should end up in there too, like all other offensive kind of stuff that is already in them.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 06:49 AM
2

Are you a man? Men are often bad at judging the looks of other men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 09:27 PM
6

Much of the stuff she claims is flat out wrong though, even though it is very popular to believe in it. The same goes for some of the bullshit claimed by the reviewer e.g. about bonobos. And this: Instead, Stoverock presents detailed solutions, specifically her proposal is to return to a female choice world where women select few men for mating while the larger rest goes around without ever having sex at all. It gets better: she wants a society which recognises such “sexually undesirable” boys e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 06:31 PM
3

Seems like it is full of retarded bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 06:00 PM
1

Loool. Not bad.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 04:17 PM
8

What a total piece of shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/21 05:44 PM
3

Sounds like it depends on what you believe in. And just claiming that the people who are in agreement with you are decent and the others are not... just lmao. That is just your opinion and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 08:37 PM
1

But why must we sink to the lowest common denominator? Why not be the better person? Lol. Funny how this is always demanded from men by entitled women. Pfft.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 08:34 PM
3

To be clear a women slapping a man isn't justification to put her in the hospital or in the ground either though. Equality means they ought to be treated like a man doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 08:31 PM
4

It was not unprovoked. Regardless of whether you think it was the right thing to do, it was not unprovoked.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 08:30 PM
2

Well in the context of the law, that’s assault x3. Depends on where it happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 08:30 PM
0

I also doubt that he'd do the same to some male friends. So what? Many people do what they can and only suffer what they "must" (etc). That makes perfect sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 08:29 PM
3

Or maybe he thought what he was doing was morally right.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 08:26 PM
1

Do you seriously believe this? Like, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 11:48 PM
2

No? OP wrote: I think as women started to fulfill the beauty standards that were set up for them I think that not being fat is the most important, controllable beauty standard for Western women. They are not fulfilling it and it seems to be getting worse with regards to that, not better. Most men are fat too, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 11:16 PM
4

Nah, you made the right call.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 10:03 AM
16

The standards women have for men depend to a way larger degree on genetical givens, and furthermore rising the level of men as a group on controllable things just raises female standards further up because how a men compares to other men is a huge part of female attraction. Everyday, women spend their time putting on make up, practicing good hygiene, finding clothes that fit them, and hitting the gym to keep their bodies fit meanwhile, men put minimum effort into their own looks. When it comes t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 09:34 AM
3

Nah, you can google the studies yourself. Cheating is pretty common. I'd argue there's biology to it because statistics also confirm men tend to cheat more often than women. Men are more likely to admit it, that is all. You can see this by how in younger generations and in places where women get less penalized way more women admit to it, and also by how women who think that lie detectors work admit to way more cheating than other women of their own demographics.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 09:25 AM
2

You can tell a lot about a person by knowing their friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 09:21 AM
1

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 07:53 PM
3

I suspected this, which is also why I checked it a bit for myself. As for poppy's comment, it is understandable that she is frustrated with the bullshit that black women often get for their looks. I’m not sure what he wants. He has a chip on his shoulder. Every day it’s a new “white men are losing our supremacy” screed. I think if someone is agitated like that they often want to get attention and agreement because that makes them feel slightly less anxious about their fears etc. Even attention a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 07:23 PM
10

Yeah, that is some bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:01 PM
0

So they deleted their comments afterwards? Aside from that, yeah, poppy will not get banned no matter what she does, and the other user is a mod herself. Meanwhile we are just poor powerless things :(((
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 05:53 PM
1

I see. I wonder if the opposite would also be allowed in this subreddit. Or was it somewhere else?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 05:44 PM
2

What jokes did she make?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 05:35 PM
4

You should switch to someone else. What an unprofessional ***.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/21 09:09 PM
18

Typical Feminist bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/21 09:09 PM
1

Look at our response lengths to begin with. Not everybody types like a slowpoke. Also reminds me of the people here that take years to read a paragraph. Lastly, what a ***** non-sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 09:03 PM
1

I find it curious that you've changed the topic when I asked you to provide stats you were talking about. You did not ask me though? And I said I would not search for them cause right now I do not care to. No need to make up some bullshit. And you cherry picked paragraphs, when I was talking about the whole article: You were not talking about the whole article anymore than I. And the household shit is pretty questionable, but fair enough, I should have addressed it so you could ignore it like th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 03:28 PM
1

Oh, what a terrible burn! Also, my comments there have more upvotes than downvotes. Just so you know, you know. Lastly, who cares if it was you or somebody else. It was suspicious, it happens mostly when you disagree with female users here, etc etc. And the thing about the screenshot was supposed to be a bit funny (no need to be paranoid to notice extremely obvious possibilities, though). Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 03:11 PM
1

It seems that it's more a problem of men's attitude. Pretty sexist of you to first just ignore the things I pointed out, which where noticed by a woman who researched the topic, and then to go on and automatically assume that anything but the cheating must be due to the men alone or even mostly due to them. For the cheating thing, this can be at least partially explained via time and opportunity, and there was also nothing said there about women, who are also more likely to cheat when they earn …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 03:08 PM
1

Further above you made some claims, which I left unaddressed, and which I now quoted, and to which that link is relevant. I also made it obvious that I was switching to the other topic imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 03:00 PM
1

Yeah, depending on what you mean by guessing. Never said anything else either, and I do not feel like searching for those stats now. But: https://kslnewsradio.com/1905294/more-women-are-outearning-their-husbands-than-ever-but-we-arent-willing-to-talk-about-it/? According to writer Liza Mundy, it’s actually the wives that struggle the hardest with breaking gender roles. “I found some men felt threatened by their partners’ high-earning status and retaliated against it, but mainly it was women who …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 02:56 PM
1

Yeah, many white people overestimate how they desirable they to other groups outside of their very own countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 02:45 PM
1

Are you really that paranoid? A screenshot proves nothing because you can just undo your downvote to make it. Holy moly. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 02:43 PM
1

I think I have, but I am not sure how many men out-earn their wives by only a bit . So there might be a "decent amount" of them. Iirc for most couples where the woman outearns the man they indeed outearn them by only a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 02:42 PM
1

Can we?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 02:33 PM
1

Sure. Right before you respond I got exactly 1 downvote. Whatever. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 01:22 AM
1

Lol at the silly downvote. Yeah, I was not arguing against this. I really do not care to right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 12:46 AM
9

Woman on average do better than men in academics Because everything caters to them and boys are subjected to sexism and biased grading.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:38 PM
1

Japan has problems that go way further. Tons of literally pedophile shit. Iirc it is not even that long ago that this stuff was finally outlawed. Furthermore most of anime at least is target at younger audiences. Add to that that many Japanese women are very short and imo look very young. So that will also influence how anime characters are drawn. Lastly, tons of hentai has very adult looking adult women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:19 PM
–

a third of households in the US have an outearning wife. Most of them by like 5$ probably. Or they are both filthy rich. And "not ideal variant" != undesirable partner. This aspect of them is clearly not desired. Which is what matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 06:14 PM
2

Happens to me too even though I am always super polite.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 05:46 PM
1

Lmao :)))
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 05:42 PM
1

Sure :)))))
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 04:11 PM
1

Once I have the time I will conduct a study on this. Just for you. But 5'2'' is ridiculously short.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 04:07 PM
1

Men in general don't give a shit about women's height unless she's taller than him. Lmao. Stop it! No. Femcel? There's no such thing. Literally only ever hear this bs from incels and femcels.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:59 PM
1

How fat is fatty?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:58 PM
1

Umm okay. I've never seen my guy friends reject a woman because she's 5'2. If you say so. I saw stuff like this happen. And 5'2'' is super short. Look up the wives and girlfriends of NBA players, most of them are ig models. How many of them are literally femlets. Aside from that, those are not your average short women anymore than xy famous short handsome actor is an average short man. Are there men that don't won't date short women? Yes! More men than you think would not want to reproduce with …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:52 PM
1

I'm not saying that there are no men out there that wouldn't date short women, but height is not much of a concern for men as it is for women. Not as much, but clearly, it is bad garbage genetics and many men know this. It is not wrong at all to point out that literal femlets are not as desirable as other women. Why don't NBA players date WNBA players? They never do? Most NBA players date women that are way shorter than them. Which even above average women still are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:39 PM
2

Keep telling yourself that. Men desire women more than women desire men. On average. But so what? Men don't care about height when it comes to women. Nah, plenty of men realize that short women are not a smart choice for reproduction (obviously they will not tell this to women). And given how knowledge keeps spreading, ever more men will think like that. I live in a country with tall people, and here a short woman is at best neutral, I heard from some Swedish people that there it is even often c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:28 PM
1

Why then do men, in art designed and marketed to men (through comics, video games etc) always draw hourglass women? Do they? Tons of skinny women with strong jawlines everywhere...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:25 PM
1

Nah, not everybody here is racist. Sounds like projection (i.e. given what you wrote about Asian men).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:24 PM
2

You don't get to tell women that they aren't desirable because women are sexual selectors not men. Nah, this is not completely true. Femlets are sexually less desirable. Plenty of women are not desirable. And short women generally have bad genetics and also tend to be dumber.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:20 PM
2

About height? Like, if she’s too tall I also know dudes who do not like women that are too short. This obsession with having women look like literal girls seems to be an American thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:09 PM
1

He might also be a cat robot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:05 PM
1

No need to get angry. It was literally a stupid oversight of mine. Making this distinction is important though, and not pedantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 03:03 PM
–

Yeah but 80% of people don't reject you for that alone. Women. If you are 5'3'' in a Western country as a man dating women? They absolutely will. Gay or bi men, or transgender people etc might be different. I'm sure someone has posted stats on here before about difference in sex/relationships according to height and it was a very minor difference. There was a decent difference there, especially for those who do not do well at all and those who do very well, and what you said was only true as lon…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:02 AM
–

Women will breed with tall men over the next generations and as a result the average height for humans will be higher. Female average height will go up too and "tall" is relative to begin with. Aside from that, transhumanist and general technological developments will probably make this stuff irrelevant over the next generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:44 AM
2

So smaller men think high heels are unattractive? Doesnt seem quite right. Well. Most men prefer women closer to their own height (but still shorter), rather than the huge height gaps that most women want. The majority of women needs high heels to get there (not that this is their only effect). And it seems like many short men indeed get at least insecure etc around high heels (partially probably because the women become as tall or taller than them and start treating them worse). That should hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:32 AM
1

I saw people reporting that they got bad responses after taking off their boots.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:21 AM
4

I have the same experience. Never in my life did I get a negative comment on it either. The women here are weird anyways and tend to lie often, so anything they say should be taken with a grain of salt.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:19 AM
2

They also basically fake having better genetics than they have. Studies show men prefer smaller height differences, and high heels make those femlets look taller and thus more fitting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:16 AM
2

Tons of men care. With the exception of hobbies though, imo women tend to lie about other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:15 AM
1

So women should be honest about their body counts?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:14 AM
–

The vast majority of people won't want you regardless of your height Depends on your other stats. Aside from that, if 80++ of people reject you for that alone (with a chunk of the rest not preferring it), then add in other deal-breakers of which virtually anybody has some, matters of taste, availability of options that are like pareto-improved versions of you (from the viewpoint of most women), the limited amount of people you can realistically interact with given any time frame and the luck com…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:57 AM
4

Oh **** with this bullshit. Firstly, I can complain about whatever I want as long as I break no rules. Secondly, this is not about me. Thirdly, fat women should stop pretending that they cannot do anything about it. Lastly, not all women think like you. Maybe one day you will learn that women are not a monolith (lmao). Edit: Firstly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:53 AM
–

well except that fat women still get make attention. Lmao. I remember a resident fatso here cry about her loneliness while exhibiting ever worsening mental health. Maybe I will be able to recall later who exactly it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:37 AM
–

Absolutely not comparable. Bad faith bullshit. Such a surgery is illegal in most places because of how dangerous it is, costs 100k plus, reduces your athletic potential forever while having a high chance of crippling you, and does not fit many people's proportions while only giving a few inches. Seriously, I hate it when fat women spout bullshit like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:34 AM
–

My counter-offer is that they were always attracted to these people, but allowed themselves to feel the attraction and be drawn to them. I think this is a big thing, especially with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:32 AM
1

Most people are repusled by what used to turn them on as teens This is more a female thing. Unless you mean the age component.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:30 AM
0

Yeah, no. Seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:28 AM
–

What other reason would someone have to complain about the sexual preferences of others, if it wasn't for being excluded or for someone else being excluded from sexual access? Not everybody is completely selfish and does not question the implications of anything as long as it favors them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:27 AM
2

Lmao. It obviously is, to some degree even in both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:26 AM
–

Also many fat people can't change weight either Lmao. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:23 AM
–

Lmao with this bullshit. At that height, especially today, the vast majority of women will just not want you. No need to blame those dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:22 AM
3

If it worked like that you could just choose to be impervious to most random propaganda (including advertisement) even if exposed to it for longer periods of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 07:49 PM
2

Also, if he's not attractive, he's never going to get an attractive woman. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 07:44 PM
–

Even if that was true that alone would be useful. It is not true though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 07:18 PM
–

If you got money and status that can easily contribute significantly to your SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 06:42 PM
2

I’d say it’s easier to make friends as a male than as a female. This insight must be coming from your long experience as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 06:27 PM
1

Extroverts do not always have high people skills. Some are just obnoxious twats.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 06:26 PM
1

You don’t join clubs to fuck their members Eh? Hmph.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 06:25 PM
1

Lol at the one random dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 06:24 PM
3

The resistance of some people here to the idea of working on one's social etc skills is quite ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 06:22 PM
–

If she is that kind of trash they should consider taking the child away.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 06:18 PM
1

Women shouldn’t have to end their pregnancies just because they’re poor Society does not owe it to you to finance your procreation. If you are incapable of doing so yourself, you probably should not have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 06:17 PM
8

It shouldn't be like this You just really hope it is. But I wouldn't mind getting the longer part of the stick for a change. Yeah, because as a woman you are not already massively privileged. Makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 06:46 PM
–

Sexist inequality is good if it benefits me. Ok. Not that this is unexpected (most women, especially Feminists, think like this).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 04:15 PM
2

Men are intimidated by attractive, independent women Often those women are just disagreeable, which is not something the majority of men prefers.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:52 AM
3

Sometimes when people say stuff like this they also tend to ignore things like e.g. the man being tall. Ridiculous as it might sound to the kind of people that frequent this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:50 AM
2

This is obviously bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:47 AM
2

We are talking about top tiered in looks right? Random prostitutes are not top tiered in looks. Are you going to try and argue that people who make their living by looking good are not the best looking? They make their living by having sex with people who pay for it. For that to work they just have to look good enough for a decent amount of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:43 AM
1

I just think they need to drop the delusion that they're of high value because they get it. Their product gets sold for the right prices decently well. That makes it high value from their perspective. No delusion involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:14 AM
1

People still chose partners mostly according to cavepeople criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:13 AM
1

Nobody forced her to settle nor did anybody force her to procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:10 AM
0

Sounds more like you are just more into women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 10:43 AM
5

What is your gender (growing up)? Male. Which parent pushed gender roles on you more? My mother (lmao).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 10:29 AM
3

Over 35, never married, childfree. I am questioned a lot, mostly by women. Yeah, as a man it is more likely that women question this to your face.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 10:24 AM
3

How often do you see a woman do or say something sexist against men and not call them out on it? How often do you see other women call out misandry? That is less dangerous than men trying to police other men yet you almost never see it (while women spouting sexist drivel is super common).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 07:40 AM
2

Male privilege doesn't mean your life is perfect...it just means that your gender isn't one of the things making life harder for you. Which is total bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 07:28 AM
1

I don’t give a fuck about Australia. Neither do you. No. Btw those Australian feminists should have actually seen the movie before they protested it because ironically the movie did more to expose the MRM for the frauds they are than anything feminists could have said. Lmao. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 07:20 AM
1

I have posted tons of information on this. Lmao. Tons of people already educated you on the matter and yet you keep posting bullshit. You stop it with your bad faith bs. Lmao. You know you would 100% take circumcision over the male equivalent of female genital mutilation. Lmao. There are forms of female genital mutilation that are basically equivalent, and it would make no difference then. And they are all illegal btw. As are less harmful forms. You just ran out of other people to make bad argum…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:41 PM
2

Great argument. And it makes perfect sense to be angry about this. Millions of boys are subjected to this bullshit while girls are protected from things that are way less harmful. If it was the other way around Feminist trash would never let that slide (and in that case they would be right for a chance).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:39 PM
2

One is doing a dumb thing to a baby Holy shit. This is why we need MRAs. Feminists are always only caring about minimizing male issues while exaggerating their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:37 PM
1

Stop with this bad faith bs. Male circumcision has a shit ton of bad outcomes, takes away tons of nerve endings, etc etc. Yet a mere prick to the clitoral hood is illegal. What a disgusting, sexist culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:36 PM
2

There is a reason we use different words for this. Yeah, sexism. And also gynocentrism. male genital mutilation Circumcision is legal. It takes away a shit ton of nerves endings, gives lots of scar tissue, etc. Meanwhile pricking the clitoral hood is illegal. This Feminist narrative here is disgusting as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:32 PM
2

Why do men who aren’t circumcised often choose to circumcise themselves when they are adults? Only in the US or whatever, because of disgusting preferences that some bitches there have. In most of the world this is not a thing. because I don’t understand how much better it is for them. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:32 PM
2

Male genital mutilation is illegal. It is not and your culture and attitudes are frankly speaking disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:29 PM
1

Do you get this pissed off about cultures that pierce the ears of babies? Yes? Aside from that those things are not comparable. Disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:20 PM
2

Same with the circumcision argument - the female version is the equivalent of removing the entire head of the penis. It’s not the same There are versions of female genital mutilation that are way less harmful than the most common forms of male genital mutilation. And they are all forbidden. People who are pro-circumcision are extremely disgusting primitives.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:16 PM
1

Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 12:04 PM
5

It's just one dudes misogyny and angry yelling because he is so pissed feminism is a thing. Nah, that text is pretty good, if somewhat hyperbolic at places, and was written by a woman. Pretty sexist tbh to assume it had to be an angry dude. He isn't a scientist or a researcher and his shit was debunked back in the 70s. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 09:07 PM
1

Having sex is a necessary part for many (most?) men's well-being. As a woman you might not understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 08:13 AM
1

Hmmm ok... anyways, thanks for your reply!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 06:46 PM
1

Are tiny variations off putting, is that what you’re asking? Like, for example, 4-6 noticeably blond hairs in brown eyebrows on a dark haired man. From the perspective of a woman that finds blond head hair on men off-putting. Not sure if that is considered tiny or not (women tend to be way more meticulous about many such things than men like me, so that is why I ask).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 06:33 PM
1

The thing about leaving your gender role is that you do it for yourself Works for women, does not work for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 06:22 PM
1

Not totally. But it is naturally blonde-centric Nah, only your specific type of blonde. Nobody would mistake my mother or my childhood friends for people with brown head hair. And they are natural blonds, like many people here. But so are you Yeah, as a blond dude. A dirty ethnic in a sense. No, I take for a fact what is part of the cosmetology program and legal licensing her in the US Oh yes, from the country that believes in weird super abstract races that are put onto ID-Cards iirc. This is m…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 06:18 PM
1

Actually, not true. Nah, tons of the relevant genes are different. That is why hair everywhere can differ in texture, length and coloring. We learned this in school, as did others, e.g. see some of the responses there: https://ask.metafilter.com/122106/Why-doesnt-the-rug-match-the-drapes Plus, tons of other people there describe what I have observed. There are also threads on Reddit like: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/2zfj3x/does_anybody_else_have_multiple_hair_colors_on/ With cases…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 05:55 PM
1

They literally teach undertones, and they are never metallic Yeah no. They are blue, red, or yellow. Even googling this for 1 second I can find more undertones. Go borrow a swatch book from a salon, the neutrals are much more accurate Does not change the fact that her hair was a very light blond. And the eyebrows not. This is super common, and not just due to sunbleaching of their head hair (lmao). Again, sun bleaching is a thing. For whatever reasons, some people have hair that lightens more dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 05:30 PM
1

I can complain about whatever I want. Just like women tend to do. They have no problems with dating without it. Yeah, women as a group have it way easier in dating. That is why they can often practically get away with such hypocrisies. Does not mean men have to just shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 05:09 PM
1

So? If you live up to the standards of traditional masculinity etc you will do way better than otherwise, especially if you are not that physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 05:03 PM
1

Metallic undertones aren’t a thing. Pretty sure they are. Tons of people with my "ethnic" background have a similar hair color to me. It has undertones similar to silver, grey, or whatever the hell it is. Not exactly the same as those artificial colors you can find when you google it, but it goes into that direction. I heard people call it "metallic". No, just no. You’re confusing the shine on the hair - which understandably makes it look lighter - and/or natural sun bleaching of the hair on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 05:02 PM
1

Lol. You want to have more incels around?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 04:51 PM
1

Men should be more conscious of the fact that women as a group are not returning the favor. I was like that too once, but now, tbh, fuck it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 04:28 PM
1

Np.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 04:24 PM
1

Oh yes. How often I have experienced this. So annoying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:48 PM
4

Good strategy for women imo, but guys here want sex on date 3 Because most women give this to the men that they have significant physical attraction to, so no need to waste your time on someone if they are not that into you. Moving on is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:32 PM
1

But no, brunettes often have a golden shine (due to a gold undertone) What about having "metallic" undertones? Or bronze undertones? .. In my experience most lighter haired people have their eyelashes and eyebrows 1-2 shades darker, maybe with a stray hair here or there. I think unless you have super light hair this is pretty common, to the degree that I see people complain that they cannot chose blond hair in many video games without getting blond eyebrows etc, which the people in question do n…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:22 PM
1

true i definitely agree, i just haven't met a woman who's ever had negative intentions towards me You probably look too scary and that is why they are sneaky about it. ppd is fun for boredom It can be. It can also be bad for someone's mental health. We even have users who take extensive breaks because of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:06 PM
2

Lol imagine giving this kind of advice to a man? Do you hate men this much?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:01 PM
3

Why not? Even many outright assholes and abusers do just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 11:55 AM
2

Plenty of garbage people of all kinds exist. Even more who are not "lovely people". I just took what you said literally cause I am bit bored right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 11:53 AM
1

hey now, i don't care where i stand compared to most women. they are all lovely people Yeah no.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 11:48 AM
0

So not egalitarian then. Selective to you. It is virtually always like this. Women just like to say things that make them look good.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 11:47 AM
20

Many women here think women should never be held responsible for anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 11:38 AM
1

Damn c****. Those dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 08:31 PM
1

I do not have many "brown" tones or whatever, and some of my hair has some golden shine under strong light. Pretty sure everybody here calls this dark blond. https://d3ewrnwdcmri66.cloudfront.net/content/images/2020/8/kfoodnf5-hair-color-level-chart-madison-reed/hair-color-level-chart-madison-reed.jpeg You mean like on this thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 06:32 PM
1

I’m naturally blonde. False about lashes and brows being brown No. My hair is some very dark form of blond (darker than some browns, similar to my logitech keyboard), and my eyelashes are literally dark-brown to black, same as my eyebrows. No matter the lighting. The majority of blond dudes I know are the same. that’s a weird belief held by guys who don’t understand how makeup works No, the weird belief here is to think that every blond has light eyebrows. Also, I do not get how makeup is releva…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 06:25 PM
–

Men should just pull the shame shit as women, socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 06:14 PM
1

Read once a short dude describing how balding caused him to be rejected for his height way more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 06:09 PM
1

but a bald head is absolutely not a deal breaker for most chicks Lol, how do you know? The only time bald guys are off putting When a woman has thick hair or even just hair as a personal must. Which is common. is when they were blonde or ginger to begin with. In which case, just get your lashes and brows tinted, and your problem is solved Most blond guys have (often dark) brown eyebrows (and lashes). Also, for men it is 'blond'. Lol. Furthermore, not every woman shares your strong aversion to su…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 06:04 PM
1

As long as you are happy ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 01:59 PM
1

I disagree. Both require a looks threshold to be passed for personality to even matter at all, and then men really care too (i.e. are strongly influenced by behavior etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 01:15 PM
1

I think requiring “low n” sounds like a recipe for a future dead bedroom Lol. Yeah no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 01:07 PM
1

I think men and women are more similar than you think. Our thresholds for feeling strong physical attraction are just different, and women tend to have less varied "preferences" which often have to be fulfilled too. On the other hand behavior can easily increase or decrease a woman's attractiveness. You really seem to underestimate that. Feels like projection tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 01:03 PM
3

The emphasis is different though. Oh btw: And it might be that many people just won’t get to reproduce. That is how it is in nature for many mammals. You meant men. Anyways, better throw out all that bs supporting idiotic single mothers then. This pseudo-cuckoldry is not how it is in nature for many mammals (who often just rape and take by force what they want btw). And going by "nature" arguments, it makes sense that men generally are more respected etc, especially by other men. Seriously, if y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 12:45 PM
1

Men are more attentive to their appearance? Doubt that. Don't most men just throw on crusty sweats and a tank from their floor? Do they do their own laundry? Lol. That's just the men you are going for.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 12:43 PM
5

Most men still don’t believe women are equals. Most women do not believe that men are their equals either.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 12:41 PM
1

he’s describing the perfect kind of man to put in the casual sex, “just for fun,” category. almost entirely opposite of bf/husband material. Nice stamp of approval.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 12:38 PM
1

If the only reason you are improving yourself is to get with women? Then you have the wrong motives for self improvement Not really. And women do their equivalent all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 12:30 PM
1

Looks matter, but they are not necessarily the deciding factor when it comes to female attraction to men as it is with mens attraction to women. Lol at you pretending men do not care about behavior etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 12:24 PM
–

You should pay attention to FDS. It’s the future of gender relations. Something like what we have in Japan is way more likely to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 09:11 AM
–

Pretty sure many of them are, in real life, toxic pickmes. So I would not be too sure about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 08:56 AM
2

None of what you described is specific to men. You are kind of missing the point (see my edit if you do not mind, which makes my main point more explicit). Furthermore, many of these things are significantly more likely to be "suffered" by men, which under other circumstances is enough to make something a "gendered" issue, and the fact that the majority of our social institutions are basically single-mindedly focused only on the well-being of "females" regardless of how much worse "males" are do…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 08:38 AM
1

We are not some magical collective though. I certainly did not chose to be born into disadvantaged circumstances for example. The kid I saw getting stabbed when I was a young teenager did not chose for other dudes to be violent, nor did most of the people living in the kind of environment that produces such dynamics actively chose that as a good or anything like that. People, including men, also do not choose to have the "wrong" physical features, which cause them to be discriminated against, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 08:09 AM
1

Virtually nobody cares about men's issues (even very important ones) anyways. So obviously somebody who complains about this should not expect sympathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 07:46 AM
1

Why not? Makes no sense and you do not get to decide that. Also lol at your bad faith replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 05:08 AM
1

While those things can be deal breakers, they do not increase your hotness massively unless you are already pretty hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 05:08 AM
3

Pretty sure he does not know what she really thinks and believes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 05:07 AM
2

They are probably not on people's radar because they have virtually no political influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 05:01 AM
26

I am happy I do not live in such a place. Brb the neighbor's children wave at me, I wave back, then people lose their shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/21 11:45 AM
1

Not bad.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/21 08:15 AM
3

It is probably just there to deter dudes who are not those things.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/21 07:38 AM
10

It is basically them projecting.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/03/21 07:33 AM
1

Those sexists are disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 09:40 AM
9

Sexist rubbish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 04:02 AM
10

Does not sound to me like you should consider her a "close friend".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 03:47 AM
2

Feels like this subreddit has been swarmed by women. Even that user further above is a woman.
/r/seduction11/03/21 07:43 AM
8

Lol, yeah. Hilarious.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/21 06:58 AM
2

LOl.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/21 01:45 AM
3

Female sexuality revolves around being desired. A woman needs to feel desired to feel any desire herself. Meanwhile some women grope etc men and even kids they do not even know without having gotten any indication that this behavior was wanted. And women often get visually stimulated by all kinds of things, with them being desired being irrelevant in those cases (there are studies showing that women get aroused watching animals fuck; surely those women did not fantasize that those animals desire…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 12:47 AM
5

Male-on-male rape rate is astronomical even with what we have recorded, which is a mere fraction of what happens. Astronomical? What numbers do you consider "astronomical"? Also take into account that those numbers are strongly influenced by the weird US prison system (disgusting as fuck). Sexual assault from women is rarer than the manosphere makes it out to be because it goes against the very female nature that the manosphere loves to point out so much. Bullshit. It is way more common than you…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 12:26 AM
1

I think many women here specifically are also just projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:47 PM
1

Yeah unfortunately the height thing is somewhat universal It is basically universal. So, did you change your view? Afterall, this thread is tagged CMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:37 PM
1

Well are the nerdy guys looking for nerdy girls. Women care about conventional attractiviness the most. Most nerdy women do not like most nerdy men. When I was in Northern Europe I live in Germany (central Europe but culturally very related) and being more masculine makes you more attractive to virtually all women, especially if you are physically less attractive. I noticed the men on average are more feminine By what measure? Looks? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:36 PM
1

Such a huge difference exists virtually nowhere. Anyways. Obviously some traits are more universally desired than others (e.g. male height) while others not so much. This literally does not change anything for the cases where the strong generalizations are very useful. Furthermore, women tend to be way less varied in their preferences than men. You should take that into account.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:32 PM
1

"Attacking" someone's views is a normal part of a debate. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:28 PM
2

They want this to be the case for men and boys. For women and girls there are tons of ways in which they are being taught.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:22 PM
2

Testosterone literally causes aggression. Nah. Does it surprise anyone that the overwhelming majority of rapists If you define rape such as only being committable by men, of course. murderers Maybe. Depends also on how you define this. abusers Nah. pedophiles Seriously doubt this. There are TONS of female pedophiles, and they very often get away with it. I’m sure the number for men is even higher than what is reported. But a lot of men are afraid to report because of the stigma and shame that is…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:14 PM
6

The male rates are higher than we realize bc most men who are raped are raped by other men I seriously doubt this. Tons of men report having been forced to penetrate, within relationships etc. The rates for women facing sexual assault are going to be much higher than any statistic will ever report because of the sheer unimaginable magnitude of women who will never report it. Men virtually never report theirs. Tons of shit is seen as ok if done by women to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:06 PM
6

Because it is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:03 PM
1

Those people are like "Christians" who do not believe in a god at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 10:59 PM
1

Not everybody lives in a regressive shithole where you have to be married for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 10:44 PM
0

Feminism is a bigger problem than this. I hope you care about it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 09:17 PM
3

The positive correlation between gender and height is 0.18 Source? The only thing I find is about mate choice, when I google that. You sure you are not just googling stuff you did not even read? That would also explain why you did not source this claim. a correlation factor of 0.2 Btw, let's quote it fully: In the present study, weak positive correlations were found between penile measurements (circumference, flaccid and stretched lengths), and height and weight (the r-value varies from 0.076 to…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 08:49 PM
4

The correlation between gender and height is even weaker Yeah no. yet no one has a problem if you state that men are generally taller than women Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 08:39 PM
2

A dude so "redpilled" he spoke about this stuff with his partner lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 08:06 PM
2

People have very different ideas about what physical perfection entails including ideas about skin color etc and including ideas about "leaving humanity behind" in various ways, which will probably cause selection pressures that result in tons of people having to go against their own wills or else having to suffer the consequences. Not to mention that the costs etc involved could easily lead to the creation of genetic upper classes, with all that might entail. All in all such a future looks rath…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 08:03 PM
5

There is a weak correlation there, which is probably of questionable use. still means that there's a connection Depends on what you mean by that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 07:53 PM
1

Good luck with that. Brb tons of new forms of discrimination and racism etc etc etc with lots of people dying for that bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 07:50 PM
1

Personally, I like challenges so I like to compare with the higher end of legit western studies. You are saying this is in your control? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 07:36 PM
4

Tall guys are three times more likely to have a big cock while short guys are three times more likely to have small dick To quote your own link: And this self-reported one from 5200 Americans: https://peplau.psych.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/141/2017/07/Lever_Frederick_Peplau_2006.pdf As shown in Table 1, the taller groups of men (tall and very tall) were two to three times more likely to report having a large penis than were the shorter groups of men (Shor tand very short). To examine thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 07:29 PM
2

If you conspire to have someone murdered you are responsible too, and in most countries are liable to be punished accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 09:25 PM
1

So you think we should just get rid of Feminists? Edit: Feminists are basically gender Nazis.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 09:02 PM
1

This is probably the case. I thought the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 08:55 PM
1

Underrated comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 01:37 AM
4

Yeah, women are generally disgusting hypocrites about this. The only choice you have, if you care, is to play this game better than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 01:20 AM
1

It is indeed some r/ShitAmericansSay/ stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 01:15 AM
1

Lol at leader of the free world. Imagine believing such bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 12:58 AM
0

Does not answer my question. It only shows that she does not know anything about the "redpill". Anyways. A "redpiller" who is just being open about this stuff with a partner is like a "vegan" who regularly eats meat. The rest of her description, if true, also does not sound like someone who has internalized the redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 09:09 PM
2

What about him sounded red-pilled to you? Lol at your circle-jerking here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 08:33 PM
2

Surely sounds like a "RP" guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 04:27 PM
1

Looool.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 04:20 PM
3

You sure you are neurotypical? Just btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 04:14 PM
2

As you should. Not that financial independence will harm you in dating (lol).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 04:03 PM
2

I’m telling you as a woman So what? You are not the only woman in the world. Show me one example of a woman shaming a man with an eight inch height difference from her and I’ll concede you’re right. If you have never seen a 5'0'' woman reject a 5'8'' dude based on height then I do not know what to tell you. And plenty of them demand the magical number 6. They also tend to go on and on about how short 5'7''-5'8'' dudes are, more than other women even. And since you just told other people to googl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 03:39 PM
2

First of all, average height of men in the Middle Ages was a little over 5’8. Which means they were about as tall as modern men, not shorter. Who was talking about the middle ages, lol? Plus, no, that means they were shorter than their modern counterparts in most places in Europe (where that claim comes from, iirc central and northern Europe). Testorone when taken during puberty 100% causes increases in height, a simple google search can tell you that. Only in people with specific deficencies. E…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 03:23 PM
2

A simple google search will show you that there are tons of other factors determining all kinds of growth, especially height. . My claim is not that “injecting testorone will make you more attractive” I pointed this out because that is the kind of source you provided to support your argument. but that NATURALLY high T men are more attractive. Nah, if you inject enough of it during puberty then your jawline etc might grow way more than it otherwise would have, though you risk stunting your growth…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 03:15 PM
1

Saying men "let" women define masculinity suggests you think women require men's permission to have opinions. I said "FOR THEM." Pfft. Men have to decide for themselves how they want to behave why with respect to gendered behavior. Of course they will inevitably take women's opinions into account. Does not mean though that this discourse should become ever more dominated by women, as imho seems to be the case especially in Anglophone countries. Lookism based approaches to masculinity, aside from…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 03:01 PM
2

For this person masculinity == equals looks and basically nothing else. This kind of stuff is why men should never let women define masculinity for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 02:48 PM
3

Notice that this list is of very low quality (you will not increase "your jawline by inches" if you inject some testosterone lol) and does not even include height. Iirc having too much testosterone early in life actually closes your growth plates, and the hormone itself plays a main role in the closing of male growth plates. The fact that it’s a minute amount of the population only further proves the point that testorone levels and masculinity are decreasing. Because people back then where talle…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 02:47 PM
0

TRP bans women No. and anyone who shows up arguing with red pill tenets No.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 12:20 PM
1

And the vast majority of women is insecure on some level.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 11:18 PM
2

Because dating has lots of "zero-sum game" like aspects to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 02:41 PM
2

Yeah, she was testing him, and also she had to make sure not to look too much (lol) like she is pursuing him now after he started just walking away.
/r/seduction22/02/21 02:01 PM
2

I was surprised that so many people here did not see this (probably should not have been surprised though). Not saying he necessarily should have tried to take it further with this particular woman, of course.
/r/seduction22/02/21 01:55 PM
2

Lol, not bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 11:55 AM
8

Clearly, we need more male teachers to combat the influence of all the sexist female teachers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 10:43 AM
9

Men haven't been handed shit ever. Go read a history book.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 10:42 AM
2

That user is a woman I think. That would explain why they complain about not being married etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 10:32 AM
3

'its not as big an issue as a lot of dudes make put'. As long as you are very attractive otherwise, which statistically the vast majority of people are not. So yeah, your anecdote is basically meaningless and height is a very big deal if you have to compensate that much (via things you cannot control anyways).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 10:15 AM
1

You are basically saying that environmental aspects do not play into a human's development. While you might think that they are deterministically provided givens they are still not part of your genetic make up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 05:14 PM
2

Lol at some of those guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 05:05 PM
2

Or she only learned what to say. Who knows (you are in a way better position to make a judgement on this obviously).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 11:27 AM
1

Nah, women sometimes cheat even with "objectively inferior" men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 11:14 AM
2

Both men and women lie of course. But we know for example from n-count studies that there is a tendency for women to lie even more (about stuff like this). E.g. hook them up to lie detectors and many women will suddenly be more "honest" and the numbers multiply. Anyways. In younger generations slightly more women admit to cheating for example than men, and I have seen many psychologists, relationship experts etc explain that by saying that actual female infidelity probably did not go up that muc…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 11:08 AM
7

We were talking about women in this thread, right? Anyways, that behavior is very common among women. Since women are way more into branch swinging, hypergamy, and back up partners, it makes sense that they would be prepared to narrativize accordingly. If they fail at that their value as a partner for commitment goes down massively and even if they still e.g. get their new partner to commit said partner would most likely take their nature into account. That is not a position a woman wants to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 11:02 AM
9

Often a relationship magically becomes bad the moment a more attractive potential partner appears and seems interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 10:41 AM
3

This is a self-reported stat on cheating, and not on "upgrading". Aside from that, we know that women lie on such studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 10:38 AM
4

Branch swinging is very common. So yeah, that stuff happens often.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 10:22 AM
6

Tons of women just start some beef or make up some shit and that's it. If they do not just cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/21 10:17 AM
1

Women are smarter than you give them credit for.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 05:48 PM
1

I wonder how true something like this might be for social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 03:51 PM
0

Projection. Upon reflection, it is not even that. I wonder how you came up with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 03:31 PM
3

Depends on your proportions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 03:12 PM
1

Yes, though my knowledge about the US is second-hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 03:11 PM
1

Seriously?? I guess she wants to feel like a child next to him 🤣 Makes perfect sense, right? Explains a lot too. Is the average height in Germany comparable to Norway? Yes. Might be like 1 cm higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 03:04 PM
1

She is like 4'11' iirc. Im just glad I don't live in Norway. The height standards seem even worse than in America. I wonder about that. I live in Germany and it seems the "standards" in the US are higher than here. Who knows how representative the stuff this other user says actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 02:31 PM
1

Women love to take stuff that's not theirs. I noticed this too. Pretty annoying often.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 02:22 PM
1

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 01:58 PM
3

Time for those leg bone, spinal, jawline etc workouts.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 01:25 PM
1

Requirement, you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 01:01 PM
1

People get touchy about this stuff Because female preferences are pretty monolithic. Imagine basically being nobodies type.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 01:00 PM
1

This person is hyper-fixated on height and on being mean about it ( she is very short herself btw). Plus the average height of men in Norway is like 510.5'' (slightly below 180 cm).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 12:54 PM
1

I know it's much more difficult for "shorter" men. They are ruled out by the vast majority of women due to a singular trait. Something you claimed women would not do. But that doesn't mean some of those men aren't compensating elsewhere and getting in relationships at reasonable ages. Lol. It's the same for anyone non-white in the West. Nah, women have it massively better. Regardless of "race". And some non-white ethnic groups have it better than others. But it still works out. It certainly does…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 12:34 PM
1

Well, all you said is "we both know they do". And I don't know that. I don't know women who have rejected over singular traits, and I'm sure it happens but I don't know if it's the majority of women. Nah, the majority of women rules you out for height alone if you are below 5'7''. Or even at 5'7''. Men of different races with different features are still getting cuffed. Some have it so much harder that it is basically a meme. It might be harder for people with certain features (i.e. short men) b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 12:06 PM
1

Over a singular trait? We already had this conversation if iirc. Do we really have to go through the motions again? Women don't have fetishes that encompass every type of man, no, but I would say some variation or "preference" esists. That variation is pretty small, most "controversially attractive" dudes tend to be pretty similar to each other too. The set of features women find attractive is pretty small and strongly shared by the vast majority of them. So: plus women find different men and di…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:56 AM
2

I don't think most women do We both know they do. plus women find different men and different features attractive Women's tastes are not that varied. I don't think it's necessarily shallow. It generally is. Human attraction is shallow, humans are generally shallow as fuck, let us just admit this and move on please. Edit: You can even do your altruistic thingy and just agree with me to spare my feelings. Is that not a great idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:27 AM
1

I'll admit that's probably part of it, Lol. That is literally the main, basically sole reason. No need to pretend otherwise. Plenty of women even admit that much. it makes you feel better (which goes into this). What matters here is that no shit is given about how the dude feels aside from the practical implications that might have for the woman. No need to ascribe benign altruistic motivations where there are, generally, none. or even too honest. You mean honest at all. Saying something is "wro…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:23 AM
1

Women only care about that because it makes them look better and helps evade potential negative consequences. Which makes sense. But let us not pretend that the guy's feelings matter to them otherwise (not saying they necessarily should to any great degree btw).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 11:01 AM
3

Yes, they just pretend that this is not how most people use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 10:42 AM
1

"Holy shit. I am the patriarchy.” ― Brené Brown Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/21 01:19 AM
3

I agree with the headline.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:35 PM
1

There are tons of reasons why one might get a decent, "expensive" hair cut, but for getting laid it probably does not make that much of a difference. If hair didn't matter then guys wouldn't be so bothered by baldness. Being bald is something else, and often a dealbreaker. Does not mean that some averagish or below dude becomes significantly more attractive just by having a good hair cut. It is more important to just have hair, and not have it look too ridiculous or repelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 02:24 PM
1

I read a post where a woman said her husband leaves serious shit stains in his underwear all the time, Loool. Wtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 01:57 PM
1

Stuff like your frame, face, height etc are way more important than your specific haircut, unless it is ridiculous. For most people it really does not make that much of a difference (for getting laid).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 01:45 PM
1

Most women have / have had casual sex. With the same kind of men generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 01:31 PM
4

Anybody reading this exchange can see that you did that. Also, what is it with that deranged personal attack? "EVeryBOdY WHO DISAgReES WITh Me oR who CaLLs OuT My BULLshITiNg Is aN iNcel." Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 01:25 PM
3

Like I said you are right just give up on dating women. Etc etc. You said you are a lawyer? Lol. I literally quoted what you yourself said in my other reply (https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/ln1em1/if_men_want_more_opportunities_for_sex_why_dont/gnzzh0h/?context=3). No need to attack me and make up some bullshit just because I pointed out that you are gaslighting him.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 01:23 PM
7

You know what you are right. You are destined to a life of loneliness This is not about me (lol at your idiotic personal attack and the bs you just straight up made up). This is about you gaslighting people and lying. That pisses me off. Could I make better use of my time? Yes, but so what?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 01:19 PM
1

I do not care either way. If I felt I needed that, I would just do it, which is why I recommend it to those who feel like they have no other choice. Does not have to take that much time either, if you are smart about it (and if you are not into that kind of stuff, lifting and eating "properly" takes way more time and effort, and for what then?).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 01:06 PM
1

Meh, for me it does not change much imo. I know others that seem similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 12:57 PM
1

You can use "beta game" to string along women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 12:52 PM
2

For many men it does not make much of a difference anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 12:46 PM
2

This is also partially an American thing. It does not fit what I observe in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 12:44 PM
4

Many women here just want the attention they do not get in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 12:35 PM
9

You yourself said your stated minimum is 5'7'', though "you honestly prefer 5'10'' and above" (while being 5'2''). You switched from a 5'7'' dude (the shortest you ever dated) to somebody who is 6'3''. So when you write: I am a woman and yes you can. You have no credibility. Also, seriously, what is the point in gaslighting him? Seriously? Anyways. At 5'6'' with an average face he is bound to struggle massively unless maybe he manages to become extremely sociopathic and rearranges his whole life…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 12:23 PM
3

they say well he looks like he goes to the gym, he’s tall, etc. But most women say he has a nice face Most women care massively about height. Including you (one look into your profile shows this, though of course you write some contradictory drivel here and there). Ridiculous gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:57 AM
2

I disagree I think Tom Cruise has a very attractive face Due to plastic surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:57 AM
7

There are plenty of 6’7 men with pointy ears and a thin jaw line and no hair that are married Yeah, they are 6'7''. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:56 AM
3

He can just do paternity tests and act accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:39 PM
2

I almost pucked reading your clichéd comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:36 PM
–

What men don’t realize is that they’re more privileged in the now than most of history. Not true. At no point in time have men been judged more by factors totally outside of their control than now. Back in the day as a young broke guy your chances of getting a partner were close to nil no matter how you looked like since your superiors and elders were busy getting all the women as wives No.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:25 PM
–

What about female spaces receiving tax payer money. Are they shut down at the same rates?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:13 PM
2

You are quite scary tbh. In any case, I am done here. Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:06 PM
0

Do you even know what gaslighting means? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:02 PM
1

I agree that those things have happened. So we should judge women and Feminists accordingly, by their worst members. Glad that you agree! and you can see how frightened you should act around either. I live in a first world country though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:56 PM
1

You are lying by claiming that you are quoting me. Should be a bannable offense tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:49 PM
1

Sure. Are the worst feminists killing men? Are the worst women killing men? Yes and yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:49 PM
–

Ridiculous to complain about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:44 PM
4

Yeah, generally it is just some manipulative bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:40 PM
–

This person was a woman before if I had to guess so they do not like the implications of what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:38 PM
–

Because feminists You said we should judge a group by its worst members. I could have even said "women", and that would have made sense too. That's what's actually happening with men killing women. Is that so? I guess this depends on what you mean by large numbers, and how you interpret this (e.g. through the lens of your own traumas or Feminist ideology, or in different, more reasonable ways).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:36 PM
–

Yup. So Feminists are out to murder random guys. Good to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:10 PM
3

Might be so. No need to pretend though that the only reason to choose something other than a modern Western woman is that one cannot get one of those. We already have attractive and successful women opting out of dating entirely by choice. The vast majority of those is only attractive to other old etc women so virtually no man cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:03 PM
2

where is this magical place where everyone is a devout Christian, It's called hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:46 AM
2

For many women it is all just about them. That is the whole point of marriage generally, binding an idiot to them and using him.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:38 AM
2

Lol at how bitchy some of the users here get when you question their holy cow.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:35 AM
1

Often by a few dollars at most.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:24 AM
1

Nothing wrong with a man who wants to get what women get.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:08 AM
1

Maybe some women will finally woman up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:04 AM
7

Women actually don’t care if the men who can’t get women get a sex robot. Those might not the be the only men who will get them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:01 AM
3

Reacting to bad treatment and bullying attempts does not mean that one has an inferiority complex. It is mostly trashy bitches etc that want men to just take this bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:57 AM
2

Kevin Hart, A joke. Peter Dinklage, Danny DeVito Be a famous actor to be maybe tolerated by some woman. Why do you guys keep insisting "Short dudes can't get love/sex" Strawman. Sorry, "person". Charles Manson was a 5'2 psycho hippy Just be a total psychopath bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 05:54 PM
2

again, balding men should do whatever they want. While being aware of the consequences. They should make informed choices. nobody is entitled Always this blablablub about imagined entitlements. if the consequence is that one woman This is not just about women but also about how you are generally perceived by people with all that entails. Plus, just btw, it is safe to say that more women like a dude having hair than not. i never said you couldn’t comment, so you keep bringing up a point that is i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 05:52 PM
1

Not relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 05:44 PM
1

No. Something being required does not mean it is sufficient. That's not how equations work. Lol. Did you ever think about the different types of love that's not solely focused on sex? Who do you take me for? Of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 05:43 PM
3

No sex = no love does not mean that sex = love. Basic logic. **** ****.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 02:49 PM
3

Lol. You call what might result from such a "strategy" "love"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 02:45 PM
1

balding men should do whatever balding men wanna do. While being aware of the consequences. i prefer that image, and i’m allowed to have that preference regardless of how ridiculous you think it is lol. You can think whatever you want, yes, but if you voice it here, people can also comment on it. i wear makeup on occasion, but even then it is always a more natural look. The point is you use make-up (natural look lol). Nice double standard. Though of course, you are allowed to have double-standar…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 02:20 PM
1

because i would rather him just wear it natural? it just seems like an unnecessary hassle to try to grow it back. Sounds like nonsense. If the tech is there, balding men should use it. Balding etc causes you to be judged accordingly by many people. make-up isn’t really comparable because you can wash it off. Does not seem relevant. "Just wear your mug naturally", etc still seems to apply. same with braces, you can take them off. Why not just own your ugly teeth etc though instead of changing the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 02:02 PM
3

I saw people here put up studies where men and women just disagreed and then just presume that the women were right.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 01:13 PM
1

Really, highly? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 12:50 PM
1

i don’t really like the idea of a guy using medicines to try to grow it back And why? just rock it naturally and hope it looks good. I hope you do not use any make-up etc and never had braces or anything comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 10:53 AM
1

Look, I won't go on. Ok. Makes sense, given that I am right. I think you have your thing going and you arent really open to listening to my experience as a woman The irony. Seriously. I think that maybe you are having tunnel-vision No, u If you want, there are plenty of sources to educate yourself about why women are not the privileged group You mean Feminist bs? Have seen enough of that. More than you probably. and you can browse any sub or website, Been there done that. without overlooking men…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 06:04 PM
-1

Maybe women can just fake beliefs for personal gain This is one of those things were men and women are different. Women are on average way more sociopathic than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 05:16 PM
1

I can judge the level of attractivness of men being a woman, I would argue I am even more objective in doing so Studies show that women rate men disfavorably compared to what should be the case statistically, whereas men rate both men and women as would be expected. Men perceived to be average tend to objectively be above average. the attractivness of my friends were evalued from third parties. You cannot just combine all your ratings like that. Most couples are looksmatched, and unless the guy …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 04:45 PM
1

I won't impose my view to you You cannot. If I wanted a very specific set of things Not that super specific imo. No need to exaggerate. but It will be worth it in the end right? Imo no. Which is why most men should think twice about seriously committing if it is not absolutely necessary. All my girlfriends have uglier SO and they are happy together, so I have a different experience. Why do you think you can judge this as a woman? And yes ugly people struggle. Or just unattractive people, if they…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 04:17 PM
–

Of course. And that includes writing whatever I want, dudette.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 04:09 PM
–

Unicorn hunting is idiotic. Better to "enjoy the decline".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 04:05 PM
–

More likely what she thinks is equal is not actually equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:53 PM
8

It is basically a weird modern day religion, and similar in many ways to Nazism.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:52 PM
2

I would not let myself be gas-lighted by a FDS user.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:43 PM
0

There are girls with no minimum look as well If somebody does not meet most people's minimum looks requirements then they will most likely struggle romantically and sexually. And due to how the sexes work, with women being way pickier, way more men than women fall into this category. and girls usually get with men a little bit uglier Does not fit my experience. About the hook ups: that's up to you. You think your self-respect is bound to the body count of your partner, your culture and personali…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:40 PM
3

I think many of those women are just virtue signalling and revel in the attention they get when they state their bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:27 PM
1

Here the importance of "leveling up" with good hygiene, intelligence, social skills and (Sorry but here I got the most dead ends) emotional maturity. Without minimum looks most of that does not matter much for finding a partner. Edit: also if I have hook ups when younger I can still want serious stuff later Traditional men like him do not want such women though. Which makes sense. Not to mention that he would just be settled for later if that happened lol. No self-respecting man wants that. and …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:08 PM
1

I am a girl and I don't see a big issue with dating Lol. Why could that possibly be? I've been attracted to short men So, with how many 5'2'' dudes have you been? If this dude was living in a Western country he would be an incel for large periods of time again and again. The vast majority of women would not want him just based on his height alone. (plus I am from the EU, we arent the same as americans). EU countries have many differences too, but 5'2'' is a height at which you will struggle for …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 03:03 PM
3

And traditional men, whether from those cultures or your own, do not want most Western women. That other user just pointed to those groups to make it more obvious that traditional men would not want most Western women. Which btw does not necessarily mean that they are "sexist" in any bad way.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:52 PM
–

Women don’t want those guys, physically or culturally There are some American women, a group which btw includes non-white women, who either want Asian or Middle Eastern looking types or who would not mind that. And those dudes, depending on their family history, can easily be American guys. They just are not white. That you need a dirty foreigner (thank god) to tell you this... ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:42 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:37 PM
1

Are you being serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:34 PM
–

provide and protect. Traditional women. Not the kind of women that are around nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:32 PM
3

But you can"t embrace that if you are an average Joe with a blah salary! Always poorer women around.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:29 PM
2

Most women insist that their men must be superior in traditional ways. Take it up with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:28 PM
–

Americanized guys? Yes They are physically the same, which you mentioned too.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:27 PM
–

You are not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/21 02:22 PM
1

I don't think the current system is absolutely perfect, but neither is biology. A perfectly fair system can't be created So we should stop with all this bullshit aimed at artificially elevating the status of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 04:26 PM
1

Hahahaha. Thanks for linking this!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 04:22 PM
5

Regardless of their sex history Username checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 04:16 PM
1

Lol, it teaches you to be a weak sleazebag. The red pill is the aforementioned book dumbed down to a 5th-grade reading comprehensive level with added edgy words like "plate" to appeal to guys raised on potty humour. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 04:12 PM
1

People have been shaming whores for thousands of years. It obviously doesn't work. Nirvana fallacy. The 'whores' as you put it Good catch. Whores are more respectable. are not the issue. They are. They need to face consequences. The resulting cycle of suboptimal citizens is. Where do we stop with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 12:18 PM
5

Did not know you were that young.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 10:20 AM
7

Lol, most redpillers are probably pro abortion. Those who are not, are against abortion due to their own morals, regardless of what would be strategically best for them otherwise (which is what the redpill is about).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 10:16 AM
1

Eugenics for good phenotypes. Nah, you obviously make women exempt from it (lol). Gene editing can fix genetic disorders Gene editing will be able "to fix" virtually anything. Who cares? Bad genetics is bad genetics, and right now it seems you can only abort anyways (correct me if I am wrong on that). And if we are being like that, given that hair transplants, and work on curing and eliminating balding all exist, how is such a gene really much different from a gene for balding (aside from geneti…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/21 10:04 AM
2

Only a woman gets her idea taken over by a man Yeah no.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 09:47 AM
0

He is not "able to get sex" just because he had sex once or twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 09:35 AM
–

Also Men: Education has a war of boys! Literally true though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 09:34 AM
8

Literally true.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 09:07 AM
2

This gaslighting works less and less. Tons of people have read up on it enough by this point in time (not that we cannot see its real effects without doing so).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/21 08:17 AM
0

Your one link (lol) did not even support the vast, vast majority of what you claimed. What a cheap, obvious cop out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 10:54 PM
1

I was laughing because you sound naive as shit for trying to limit the preference to light skin to East Asia based solely on your personal experience. People going for lighter skin is not the same as them going for alabaster skin, which is what you actually wrote. And those Indians you mentioned are most likely not going for the same look that e.g. is valued by Chinese people. Do you really think that East Asia is that isolated from the rest of Asia, Southeast Asia in particular? There are huge …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 10:27 PM
2

There are people who use minoxidil to grow their beards. If you want one that might be worth looking into.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 09:34 PM
1

Because everybody has endless resources and resilience.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 08:41 PM
1

That's a cool anecdote and all but I was explaining my position which you were laughing about. You gave your source afterwards. Besides, I literally addressed that later. Call it emotional if you want, I call it passionate. You can claim whatever you want. Does not change the facts. Apparently the alternative is being detached from the reality of this subject and not knowing what the fuck you're talking about Nah, that sounds more like you. They lighten their skin as much as possible. Source tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 08:20 PM
1

Do you think that pale skin isn't valued in the rest of Asia I was referring only to my personal experience (though some stuff I picked up from random media supports said experience). The people I knew who were from Asia who were really into that pale/very white skin were Chinese and Japanese, whereas the people I knew who expressed the opposite sentiment were Thais and Indians. And the latter had strong opinions on pale people being ugly. That's it. lmao Here too, about your emotionality. For e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:50 PM
5

Downvoting is against the rules. Aside from that, this is the problem of you and the man you had sex with. Should be obvious. Edit: I take it you have no actual arguments. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 04:16 PM
1

That user is female btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 04:15 PM
2

So the Feminists with actual power do not count, and neither does the majority of Feminists? OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 04:06 PM
4

Yes, the level of entitlement in that comment is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 04:04 PM
7

and stay-at-home moms aren't paid at all. If you cannot afford that then do not do it. Why the fuck would somebody else have to pay you to bring up your own offspring? LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 04:04 PM
1

women are more at risk for sexual assault- When women sexually assault men that does not even "count" generally. But ok. also it’s men committing much more violent acts than women as well. That a minority of men is violent does not help random men walk alone at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 03:42 PM
1

Blood clotting disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 03:39 PM
2

The tall dark and handsome trope is old and isn’t really accurate. Nah, it is not. It is alive and well, virtually everywhere. Tall and handsome is all that’s needed. You don’t have to be dark. Strictly speaking you do not need any of those. Also, more important than being dark is not really being "light". but women will treat handsome blonde and brunette men the same. No. The latter will have many more takers. A good one can help you improve but how drastic the results are depend on what you we…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 03:36 PM
9

One funny thing is that many of those women who demand "respect" generally do not respect the random men whose respect they demand either.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 09:53 AM
2

It’s not wrong. Women care about height, frame and musculature, facial harmony(so solid jawline and harmonious features) and race. It is called tall, dark and handsome for a reason. Light haired dudes and redheads are not their own "race", but still get treated similarly by many women, including those who share their complexions. Whether for sex or for relationships. Comparable women do not have to face this to any similar degree. When it comes to categorizing women and how they will treat them …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 09:45 AM
1

Alabaster skin is seen as beautiful in many places. In some places in East Asia. On the other hand, darker skin is nearly universally seen as inferior, not even just for dating, for things like getting a job, too. Nobody tans to be seen as more professional. Not e.g. in Africa or Latin America afaik. It also depends on what you mean by dark skin. And I am pretty sure if your features are too fair, you are taken less seriously too (I read some study claiming this to be the case for the UK at leas…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 09:07 AM
2

Besides some strange former prejudices against red heads women didn’t have dealbreakers towards this any more stringent than men’s. This is just wrong. The vast majority of men do not have blondness or "brunetteness" as a deal breaker. Way more women care significantly about trivialities like that than men. My above statement goes for this as well. And that is wrong. If it is not blue or (dark)brown, most women are at best neutral about it. Meanwhile many men actively like other eye colors. Not …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 09:03 AM
2

Not really women judge men for eye color the same as men same with hair and skin. In my community the men are judged less harshly for skin color than women but hair and eye color men and women are judged the same. Nah, whether blonde, brunette, black, or red hair, tons of men like one, multiple or all of those colors. And if they do not, they are less likely to be deal-breakers. Women overwhelmingly prefer only dark hair, with many having that as an actual requirement. Men like women with all ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 08:29 AM
1

And tons of pale asses "have to" tan.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 08:12 AM
3

They definitely do. I’ve seen and experienced it. In my case it was skin color. Skin color maybe, but hair color does not nearly have the same effect for women as for men. Not even close. And I take it you agree with my point about eye colors. That’s the case right now but it definitely could change. A lot of women’s procedures once were difficult and dangerous and women who underwent them died or were botched but it fueled the fields to progress and now we have much safer and advanced practices…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 08:08 AM
2

Holy shit, an actual red-piller in this subreddit? My mind explodes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 07:55 AM
15

Many women want to get the same treatment as men who have very high status. If they do not get that, they think they are not being "respected".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 07:49 AM
1

Notice: While height is attractive to me, I wouldn't really think about it if I met a cute guy that embodies everything I'm looking for. How everything else has to be virtually perfect. Imo short dudes on that level should skip women like her. Or maybe pump and dump.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 07:30 AM
3

The impact of coloring for men and women is the same. In most places. In the US they’re a little more forgiving of men who are the “wrong” color as far as desirability goes. No, it is not. Men generally do not reject women for e.g. being brunette instead of blonde. Men with red hair or hair that is too light get rejected for that alone by considerable amounts of women (including in the US), and are the ideal virtually nowhere. All eye colors are considered attractive by significant amounts of me…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 07:27 AM
4

Coloring definitely does have an impact. Both men and women treat people differently based on looks. If you’re not super hot you’re not going to be treated that way by others. The impact of coloring is less for women though, and more colorings are considered attractive by significant amounts of men than by significant amounts of women. And while being super hot might not be easy, most women can at least be attractive/sexy physically, which is very hard for average + below men. They we know of in…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 07:08 AM
9

Men are at higher risk of stranger violence than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:59 AM
3

Men’s physical size/strength and ability to defend themselves. Their opponents are other men though, who will pick their targets accordingly. And weapons and groups can take down virtually anybody easily. How people tend to listen to what men say and respect them more in conversations while women are constantly interrupted and talked down to. Not sure how true this is. I think the kind of respect random women expect for such existing is only accorded to absolute "top men". Who generally did a lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:57 AM
2

Lol, some women are really delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:53 AM
3

Pretty women who have the “wrong” coloring for a given place don’t get beautiful women treatment to the same degree as women who have the “right” coloring if they even get it at all. I find it hard to believe that this has such a big impact. But at least even with this, all those attributes are ideal in women at least somewhere, for men that is not the case e.g. with hair color, or having the "wrong" eye color (i.e. if it is not blue or brown). Not to mention that those women will still get bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:50 AM
2

Not sure if thick long lashes and hour glass figure are universals required to be considered beautiful (I am not denying that the latter is considered attractive universally), and by coloring, with the hair, you mean not being gray? In that case, just use hair dye (way more socially accepted for women than for men too). About skin, meh, I do not know. Imo there are tons of beautiful women with all kinds of skin colors. Even if they do not fit the "declared" beauty ideal in a given place, I presu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:43 AM
3

For example? In any case, such a woman is already considered way more attractive than a man with genetic givens that are statistically similar. An average woman is generally considered decently attractive, physically, and an average man is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:34 AM
4

No, it is not. A way wider variety of female body types is potentially attractive to most men than is for most women. Generally women just need to not be fat and take care of their skin, hair, and put on some makeup. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:32 AM
8

Because men know that women have a primal disgust towards emotionally vulnerable men This goes so far I have seen it done to young boys by mothers, and I also read research saying it is generally mothers that react negatively to weakness emotionality in boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:17 AM
3

Most things needed to be a "top man" physically are genetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:16 AM
3

maybe men should follow their own advise? Choose better. You speak from a very privileged position. The vast majority of women is like this, and most men do not have that much choice to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:13 AM
5

In general if a women does this there are other problems its not just because he opened up. When women want men to open up they generally mean those men should show the kinds of emotion the woman wants. It is all about them themselves, the man's emotions as an actual human being do not really matter. So the "other problems" often boil down to the man having the "wrong emotions."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:10 AM
4

I do agree that we don't raise men to express their emotions the same way we do to women and that it is a big problem. But the solution isn't to try and be apathetic or hide your feelings from your partner, that spell disaster. Opening up often spells disaster. Most women do not know what they are asking for because their picture of their partners is skewed by the latter's performance of traditional masculinity / emotional control / whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:09 AM
1

Would you have stayed attracted to him if he became fat and started balding?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:04 AM
1

at least you're honest about it. While I disagree with him on that being the biggest risk, why would he not be honest about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:01 AM
0

This person preaches eugenics while carrying a genetic disorder. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 05:49 AM
1

Pretty sure it is black.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 05:48 AM
1

Nah, Americans are almost uniquely inept at child rearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 08:17 PM
1

Having a "preference" It is a preference. Most Western people are fat, so you'll just have to get over it. lol Plenty of non-fat people around me. Not everybody lives where you do. So he starved himself. He got sufficient amounts of calories to be at a healthy weight. So he was allowed to do sports by his parents. So what? What weird upbringing did you have? How old are you to think 10 year olds have alot of freedoms and discipline? You seem 12. Lol. Not every country has the majority of parents…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 07:59 PM
3

Ye I get the analogy is about how women are hypergamous and have a hard time lowering their standards once they experience a better value. Not sure it is about them necessarily having had any experience like that. More, like they never feel that something is good enough if they believe they can get something better. Like endless greed and hypergamy, even if they end up harming themselves. But I think the story would make more sense if the 5th floor was "these men have everything you could want i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 04:40 PM
0

This analogy never made any sense to me. If you're told at the beginning that each floor increases in value then of course you're going to assume the sixth floor has the highest value husbands. Shit like combining: You may visit this store ONLY ONCE! with but you cannot go back down except to exit the building! Is an obvious redflag imo. Aside from that, the main claim is that women are greedier than men, which is implied to be to their own detriment. That being said, I found the remark about th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 04:28 PM
3

You really needed to have the last word, right? So strong!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 04:02 PM
2

This is the victim mentality that holds people back, and I see it all over this sub. You guys need to wtop feeling like women have all the power and you have no control over your life. Sex isn't everything. Most women are advantaged compared to average men in this matter (and in very many things in general), and for most men having a healthy sex life etc is important. Not to mention that incels do not just get no sex, they do not get any of the other benefits of having decent relationships eithe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 04:00 PM
1

"This is such a shitty boomer joke lol"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 03:57 PM
1

This is quite funny, though it does not fit my perceptions. E.g. part of being redpilled is being realistic, and typical "chads" do not exemplify the red pill fully either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 03:09 PM
3

Not really. Many men are lonely and suffering, and people like you mock them. The end.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 02:57 PM
2

If you're talking about hookups, you're DEFINITELY not entitled to that And all other kinds of relationships. And nobody is "entitled" to any of that, whether it is marriage, not being lead on, causal sex, normal ltrs, etc etc. Your point? It's not. It is. You thinking everyone is a liar when they don't fit your narrative Yawn. Because they're not entitled to sex Does saying this make you feel powerful!? Lol. and no one wants to hear some privileged How are they privileged? whine that Stacy woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 02:56 PM
1

Lol. Healthy sex life, as if you're entitled to sex. Adorable. Your point? Your 70 percent are pretty meaningless, that is my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 02:50 PM
1

Most people marry within their own cultures/race. There is more to relationships and dating than marriage, and some ethnicities are not preferred for most of that even among their own. Unless he is shorter than the average woman, height's not the problem. This is just false. 70% of young men have had sex At least once, in a year, self-reported. SO GREAT. Also, 30 % not getting any is a lot. There are videos of people who show the posts of incels talking about how women deserve to be raped and mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 02:35 PM
1

Without knowing about them you cannot even know if you are talking about TRPers instead of e.g. black pillers or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 02:33 PM
1

Depends on what country we're talking about. Probably all countries have some significant minority of men that like "bbws". Most women do not want to be a fetish. A man having a preference does not make him a fetishist. Ridiculous double standards. Are you guys talking about being fat or obese. I meant fat. What's your point? Their situations were comparable. because most 10 year olds don't have their own income. He literally ate very little of the garbage they had, and after school went out to …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 02:32 PM
1

Bro? Lol ;) Anyways, he is totally right.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:55 PM
1

He was talking from the man's perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:51 PM
1

You comparing total singles to married people, or giving a link that implies that there is probably not much of the "contempt" I brought up in the minority of marriages that survived very long for whatever reason, does not have much bearing on my claim that it is better even for your success in long-term relationships as a man to be significantly physically attractive than to be only mildly so while having a few "compensating" personality traits or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:46 PM
1

That's just, like, your opinion, man. No. It is literally true. Also, I offered 3 sources. That were irrelevant to my claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:37 PM
1

Also, you're arguing semantics. No. And your lack of data You claimed to have data, you had none.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:34 PM
-1

Downvoting is against the rules. Not sure why you're upset there. I am not upset. Your anecdote is not relevant to my argument, as anybody can see if they care to scroll further down to see your reply to this thread itself. And, again, the data definitely doesn't support your hypotheticals. Your data is literally not relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:30 PM
0

Yeah, I'd assume it'd be obvious since everyone on this sub uses personal experience to cry 'anecdotal evidence'. You thinking it relevant does not mean it is relevant. So no, it is not automatically obvious to me that your anecdote is relevant. Tons of women here bring up irrelevant stuff, like, claiming your average joe does not have to "perform traditional masculinity" to be attractive, just look at this 6'3'' celebrity with a decent jawline who uses eyeliner sometimes while singing some rock…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:23 PM
4

The perception of you being charismatic or having a great sense of humor is strongly influenced by halo and horn effects based on your looks and other basically immutable/ only slightly modifiable traits. Of course, things like your social status etc also factor in here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:14 PM
0

My personal experience is just anecdotal evidence of that. You did not specify it enough for that to be obvious. If it even is true to begin with. I'm saying the data says you're wrong. Which data? You can easily be in a relationship with either "build". And I am saying one of those is better to have and has better "shelf life" etc than the other. If you have data disputing this thoroughly I would like to see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:11 PM
0

After 11 years my husband texted me to 'jump on his dick's and I literally came running with condoms. So, your husband is not that physically attractive and you still find his non-physical traits sexy enough after 11 years? Is this what you are saying? Most people in relationships have more sex than singles. So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:09 PM
2

This is the dumbest argument. Are incels willing to go fuck a 600 lb woman with a rotting foot? How about a methhead with like 4 teeth? So men on that level, literally, were the only men paying attention to you? This was your level? Even though there is a significant amount of men who like fat women? Hmmm. I'm pretty damn smart actually. If you say so. Fat has nothing to do with intelligence. Nah. Plenty of intelligent, self-aware people make decisions that prevent them from getting fat. There i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 01:00 PM
4

You can have both in one person, tho. If a man is not physically attractive he will have trouble finding a woman who is really physically attracted to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 12:56 PM
3

Specifically about men stopping at “good enough” in relationships when given the opportunity of a better option? I disagree wholeheartedly. Depends on what you mean by opportunity I guess. In any case I am pretty sure most men are not constantly on the lookout for something "better" the way women tend to be. You honestly don’t see the problem with that story? Aside from being a bit simplistic? No. Greed and wanting something better than you have Women are way worse with that than men when we are…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 12:41 PM
1

The purpose of the shop is just to show that "women" are impossible to please. So it is like some "gotcha" + punishment thing. The women that went all the way have to do without this very practical shop and find a husband elsewhere. You may visit this store ONLY ONCE! There are six floors and the value of the products increase as the shopper ascends the flights. The shopper may choose any item from a particular floor, or may choose to go up to the next floor, but you cannot go back down except t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 12:38 PM
5

Let her do something the Redpillers - and, in fairness, many other normies - consider “emasculating.” Let her cuck me. I literally saw threads where cucks whined about their wives leaving them for their favorite "bull". So I would not be too sure about this being viable at all, even if you are weak enough to consider this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:57 AM
5

A woman could’ve written the exact same thing in reverse She would be wrong though. Men and women are different, and there are tons of studies on this too. Just lurk more on here. Since they’re not real stories neither would have any inherent validity to them. The point of the story is to make an important gender difference more vivid. The emotional impact of a story like this is greater for most people than someone just throwing studies at them, and even if it was not, it might be nice to have …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:55 AM
5

A bit sometimes. Over time familiarity breeds contempt though, generally. And it is probably way better to be really physically attractive instead of just "mildly attractive" with some decent personality etc attributes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:49 AM
16

Why not: A store that sells new husbands has opened in New York City, where a woman may go to choose a husband. Among the instructions at the entrance is a description of how the store operates: You may visit this store ONLY ONCE! There are six floors and the value of the products increase as the shopper ascends the flights. The shopper may choose any item from a particular floor, or may choose to go up to the next floor, but you cannot go back down except to exit the building! So, a woman goes …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:34 AM
3

I do feel the need because like most men do with women you have begun to attack my intelligence. Really? I was talking about that one feminist who underwent her private "experiment" trying to be a man for some time. Aside from that, men attack each other's intelligence too. Tbh you sound like you are just very sexist, interpreting everything in this way. I am listening. Listening does not mean to agree. Listening also does not mean minimizing things and attacking men for their gender, for allege…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:25 AM
7

And whole books have been written that say just the opposite. Really? Anyways, it is obvious you are only here to preach and not to listen. You know better than us men, who have the audacity to "mansplain" our own experiences to you. So strong so independent. My law degree and six figure salary tell me I am so I am fine with that. Idgaf. Funny that you feel the need to say this though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:22 AM
8

Men and emotional labor bahhhhahhhhhhh now you got me with that one ha ha ha that’s a good one. Yes men carry so much emotional labor in the relationship let me tell you. Yes, having to constantly manage your own and her emotions, expectations etc indeed is labor. Htf would you even know? Lol. Being a man is basically being a specific type of object.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:19 AM
12

"Truly satisfied"? Generally no.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:13 AM
3

Nah, it is the other way around. They are generally short or otherwise unattractive, get treated like shit by most women and then become bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:01 AM
4

No but all men do not have this experience, a few men on this sub that come here to bitch about it. Most men instinctively understand that huge amounts of emotional labor are expected of them. Of course they will generally not admit this to women. That would be pretty dumb. Though at least online this seems to change. If women are so horrible then why do you all even bother? The vast majority of our ancestors are those who compulsively persisted in trying to procreate. The burden here is on men,…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 10:29 AM
10

I actually am not We men here speak about our experiences as straight men with women. This is not something you know directly about from our perspective. Tons of men know what we are talking about because this kind of experience is a basically a human universal. Whole books have been written about this or at least include lots of relevant information, and many articles have been published on this topic, including even by Feminists and their sympathizers. I know better about women than you? We me…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 10:24 AM
1

There are studies that show men need to pass a physical attractiveness threshold before their other attributes matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:13 AM
4

Got laid at least once within one year (lol) according to themselves. Does not mean that all of those have a healthy sex life, not to mention that 30 % not having any sex is a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:11 AM
2

Makeup and high heels. Lol. Srsly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:10 AM
5

Yes, some of them even think their genetics are good.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 09:04 AM
2

Lol. It is better to ignore trash like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 08:48 AM
6

Notice how she does not talk about the dude with the anger issues. He probably was a lot better looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 08:41 AM
9

You are literally femsplaining here and you are also making it all about you you you. Pretty ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 08:30 AM
2

It’s honestly crazy how sympathetic women can be... unless it involves a man’s sex life. You sure you are talking about actual sympathy, and not just "social" performance?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 07:48 AM
1

You’re forgetting charisma, which is the most important part. Depends on what you mean by charisma. Here is how I see it: Lots of someone's "charisma" comes from what people think of them due to the "second-hand knowledge" they have +/ infer, and then there are their looks, height, physical frame and even voice timbre etc etc giving various halo +/ horn effects while potentially adding memorability. Many people considered charismatic are not much different – besides their "better" physical attri…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 07:09 AM
1

You cannot even tell them apart from other ideologues. You know next to nothing about trp.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 07:02 AM
1

What did she write?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 06:56 AM
5

This very often gets ignored completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 06:44 AM
1

I think a guy who is educated, white collar, making 6 figures, living in safety and comfort Because that is most incels, right? And not short, poor "ethnics". because he can’t have random NSA hookups with young attractive women Or rather virtually cannot get any woman. Edit: It’s what I see of most incels on Reddit. From what I have seen the opposite is true, and women here just like to make up ridiculous stuff to...? The hell I know why all random incels have to be demonized and ridiculed to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 06:43 AM
1

So I used to be pretty fat at one point in my life, and I definitely wasn't getting any attention from the guys I was interested in Not comparable to many incel's situation. You were fat most likely because you were dumb/+ lazy, and you could have just lost that fat, and even while being a literal blob of fat you still got some attention. but that experience from the fat times was the gift that means I don't need a man for fulfillment. Pretty sure you would see this differently if that "gift" ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 06:39 AM
15

Op is weirdly obsessed with this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 06:37 AM
4

Racism in America is a unique No.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 06:36 AM
2

Better stop all these silly initiatives "artificially" boosting women's status in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 06:34 AM
2

Female dining strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 02:38 PM
0

Such ****. If you act like it and this becomes your new way of being, then that is what you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 02:30 PM
0

You still did not read the sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 02:16 PM
-1

It is pretty funny how often women do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 02:11 PM
1

Yeah sry, I wrote some incoherent drivel and just send it off. Might be interference from doing sth in a different language right now. Anyways: Yes, fame might be a minus, unless it is other famous people she would go for (which is probably the most likely "case" anyways). I saw many men express that having a famous partner would probably be stressful and bothersome. Yes, at least most men, and especially men who have some status and money, care about the status and money of their partners. Yes,…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 02:04 PM
-4

Many women produce "retards" because they mostly care about physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 01:54 PM
0

Imo for relationships high-value men generally care about money and status. Fame, I do not know. Might be a minus. But honestly, for long-term stuff, as a man having money, status and fame as primary sources of your attractiveness is probably not that great. And unless you pay for it in the case of money, your status and fame are better pretty high at least locally if you want to get laid significantly more often due to that stuff. Edit: Changed my google-translate level drivel to something more…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 01:50 PM
0

If it is not about social skills etc what is even left? Women can do sports too, can groom well etc etc. And generally have to deal with less "god-given" deal-breakers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 01:47 PM
0

So if women find men less attractive but they are getting into relationships with them (1:1 in heterosexual relationships someone has to be with someone), wouldn’t that mean they are less shallow? Women want providers who engage in lots of emotional labour for them. The really attractive men generally do not do this during their youth and later have decently high standards. Women age and become less attractive and want someone to take care of them so they settle with someone they are less attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 01:45 PM
1

Picky - overly selective, shallow - only selecting for superficial characteristics. Lol so add in some strong personality aspects and your hyperfocus on some deal breaking physical treats suddenly does not make you shallow anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 01:43 PM
0

LOl. Most women just do not want to put in the work to acquire an attractive character.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 01:41 PM
-3

But that's not how biology works. Women SHOULD be picky, that's literally just nature at play. Women and female animals are responsible for culling the weak males by not reproducing with them. Bullshit. This is not how "nature" works. Also women produce tons of retards all the time. That's why you never see female animals in the wild mating with weak/sick/small males. Except you can see that all the time, and rape too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 01:35 PM
1

Yes, but - to the point the other guy was saying - he hasn’t been convicted He is a rich dude with high status. So that should not be surprising. It is also a big part of why many women would just choose to ignore obvious redflags when dealing with him. It’s really easy to convince a girl who likes you that rumors are wrong Yes. If you are rich and have high status, and/or are physically attractive enough, many women will decide to brainwash themselves into ignoring your red flags. But that is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 03:30 AM
5

Again if these traits are inherently masculine why are so many cultures struggling with “weak men?” Because masculinity is acquired? Masculinity is not the same as "maleness". The same can be said about femininity and "femaleness". Masculinities etc emerge as responses to biological, physical, etc givens. If those change then the behaviors, attributes etc of the relevant groups change too. If that means that a given group is now significantly less suited to fullfil functions which are essential …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 03:11 AM
2

This is Marilyn fucking Manson, a multimillionaire whose terrible behavior has long been known to plenty of people Pretty sure if you go for someone like that you get exposed to the relevant information quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 03:02 AM
2

Do you honestly think abusive people lead with abuse? Do you honestly think those women do not know what they are doing? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 02:24 AM
2

This is obviously a cultural difference here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 02:19 AM
1

Lol, that this is a thing. Edit: Seems like it basically is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 08:39 AM
2

He is 6'3'', which is certainly not average and which by itself should be enough to make him attractive to many women. Also: "Peter Michael Davidson (born November 16, 1993) is an American comedian, actor, writer and producer." So I really do not see your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 08:24 AM
1

It is also not what I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 06:10 AM
1

But they would still reject the 500 lb ginger right? So by your standards they should specify “not fat”. No? There are tons of ways for a woman to pull of "being a ginger" (lol), including being an average woman (already fat in the West). The same cannot be said for an average man trying to be physically attractive to women while being skinny. Such men generally have to be lanky or whatever. And plenty of women go Gaga for conventionally unattractive skater types Never saw this happen for averag…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 03:35 AM
-1

Yeah no. When men say they like gingers, they generally mean that they like gingers, even average ones. With that "attribute" making them hotter, or at least more attractive. Furthermore, there are plenty of ways in which average dudes can look attractive (who are btw not the equivalent of someone like a "500 lb 55 year old ginger single mom"), but the skinny look is generally not one of them. Lastly, not all men, nor women, think that you absolutely have to be tall to be hot. If some specific t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 03:20 AM
1

Ok, what do they/ we get wrong most often?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 02:45 AM
5

And when men say they like thick women they should specify big boobs and butt and not a big stomach. Bullshit. Those things are not comparable. They said thick, not totally fat. Meanwhile you can be a skinny skater type regardless of height, which is not strongly associated with that. You just might not be attractive. Anyways, many men do not know that skinniness in men is generally not attractive to women, but most women know that men prefer women to not be very fat. Men will say they rather ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 02:27 AM
3

Yes, so they should specify that you have to be tall. Which most men are not. Meanwhile the other men are better of being muscular, and maybe even those men for whom that would work would still be better of being more muscular. Anyways. For the former at least being a "skinny skater type" is really not going to cut it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 02:04 AM
1

Romantic and sexual content geared at women shows you what women’s preferences are. That stuff would just leave most dudes needlessly black pilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 01:56 AM
5

A lot of women do like the skinny skater type tho. If you are handsome and tall, and maybe still young then that can work decently well. For the men needing advice this generally would not work. Why are k pop boys not muscular despite women and girls everywhere worshiping them? The vast majority of at least Western women do not give a fuck about those dudes. Plus they are very often tall, got plastic surgery for their faces, and are obviously displaying talent, status, and indirectly even wealth…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 01:52 AM
1

I got constantly told by women on other forums on the internet that women don't like muscles. They like skinny guys and dad bods. Lol. Not bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 01:50 AM
2

I haven't met a lot of black men but a common issue of the ones i have met was hardships of getting laid. I was surprised because black men presented in mainstream media are tall, masculine charismatic successful men. Yet, the ones i met wasn't even close to that idea of black men. Yeah, when people here pretend that virtually all black dudes are so magically great at all this stuff I always have to laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/21 01:39 AM
4

Nothing wrong with this. This shaming of male sexuality is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:54 AM
6

20 dollar meal to get a mediocre gf they can smash everyday Yeah, because that is a realistic expectation for people who are mostly basically incels. LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:52 AM
20

Why would men want a cheap bitch?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:48 AM
4

Not paying is a good vetting mechanism for men. Gets rid of all those sexist leeches.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:47 AM
0

I think “back then” “sexual desire” wasn’t the focus of marriage. Neither is it today. Else AF/BB would not be such a big thing in this context. Men didn’t marry to be sexually desired — it was a bonus for the lucky. I disagree with this part. Women's standards are highly dependent on their environment and past experiences. Did all those women experience consistent arousal forever with one partner? Of course not. Iirc this is not even the case for modern women who strongly vet their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:44 AM
1

So? The environment has changed, and now women's conditions for virtually all kinds of desire are harsher. This bs narrative of all those poor, poor women who were never physically attracted to their husbands back then is just bs that is used to shield modern women from criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:29 AM
0

Women often strongly desire whatever is opportune.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:25 AM
-3

When he’s considering whether to get into a LTR or not, he shouldn’t Why only then? Pumping and dumping make sense too. Because it’s his kid, and he’s responsible for it. And yet women are free to abandon their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:24 AM
-6

Women can still rape their husbands and that would not even be classified as rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:22 AM
2

Happened to a friend of mine (the threat).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 03:00 AM
2

No, I’m talking guys who only date those types. So, like a big chunk of women. The ones who used to threaten to dump me if I ever colored my hair Saw this happen to people of either sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:50 AM
12

Only works for a minority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:43 AM
2

I’ve seen them literally swipe no one women who have never been married LOL, pretty sure that is only typical of your bubble and age group. LOL, experienced men know that women who are virgins - unless they’re 16 - generally have something wrong with them Yeah no. Seems more like some bs that Feminism has pushed in English speaking countries. Look up the history of prostitution Guess I will have to read up on it. Though most of those men have probably been total losers. Edit: Changed 'Lol' to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:37 AM
1

Imagine if saying that you prefer blondes over brunettes would result in comparing you to Hitler. Read about this happening once on some tv show.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:24 AM
2

They're not telling you they will be sad if you don't want to date them, they are telling you that you are making yourself undateable Which is a total lie. Women cannot magically sense your beliefs and you can easily avoid sluts for anything more serious without suffering significant consequences. because you see women as things to own, What a disgusting lie. not humans with their autonomy. Nobody denies your autonomy. You are free to be as slutty as you want to be, and men judging you according…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:22 AM
2

Guys who have a hair color fetish are creepy, too. Preferences are not creepy fetishes. And if they were, the vast majority of women would be creeps.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:19 AM
3

Not as many as you think Really? Maybe they are just not as honest with you as you think they are. Though of course, the vast majority only wants a low n-count partner. Back in the day, even prostitutes commonly had husbands Really? Sources maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 02:15 AM
1

Partially because (as Atlas said) it has to do with a foreign influence online It makes evolutionary sense and there were always lots of Americans that thought like this. Also, foreign influence is not automatically bad, lol (tbh look at how moronic your country is in general).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 01:51 AM
1

It’s dehumanizing Not anymore than most other standards or preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 01:49 AM
1

although historically this was not true, Historically people cared even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 01:47 AM
1

Why would a man need a "low n" woman? For commitment? Because they are generally better suited for that. Especially a man who isn't a "virgin" or "low n" himself? What is your point? The genders are different. If women do not like this, tough luck (just like how men have to suck up all kinds of stuff like this).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 01:46 AM
1

Women I grew up with never cared about a man's "body count" / "ho-fax, So they did not care if that count was very low?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 01:43 AM
1

If women can gender all kinds of bs, we can do that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 09:43 AM
1

At least when I was young this much seemed obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 09:42 AM
3

Fds is mostly femcel bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 01:25 AM
9

Women who think men do not like strong women often mistake being strong for being obnoxious and/or a bully.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 12:47 AM
10

They were always pretty questionable.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 12:46 AM
9

So many people seem to want a man that's emotionally available but has no problems of his own outside of minor stresses. That is, someone who's eternally available to process someone else's stress and trauma, but has none of their own. It's frustrating, because I get the feeling that people don't even want me to be a person. They want me to be a response to them: a reactionary plot device in their life. That hurts a lot, but rarely do I see someone wanting men with all the actual feelings being …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/21 12:42 AM
2

Yeah. Fucking ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 12:35 AM
1

Is it, if the average man in the U.S. is on average 4 inches taller than the average women in the U.S.? Yes? It is a significant difference, statistically. 1 inch could be enough for lots of women. In practice it is not. meaning that very short men (a minority) do struggle with women. If by very short you mean 5'7'' in a country where the average is only 5'9''. (a minority) So? We went over that already. They are a minority of men though and lots of women don't consider them. And? This literally…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 09:44 AM
1

Men tend to see femininity as inherently lesser which is why being compared to a woman is the ultimate insult. Nah, it means you as a man are accused of failing to fulfill your gender roles. --> social ostracism and inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 09:04 AM
1

I don't think this happens as often in real life. Well, it does happen pretty often, which is all that matters. It's not unrealistic for women to want something that the majority of men have Your point? I never said anything against this? the preferences/standards come from something that is associated with masculinity (being at least taller than them) 3 inches ++, and often than other men. Or the man has to be at least similar enough to most men. and even short men are tall to some women Women …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 08:43 AM
1

? Women outright reject based on height in real life. My point is that preferring someone taller than them is not an unrealistic standard for most women. Never said this? Your point? I simply pointed out that men who are taller than most women are in the minority, What? Shorter you mean? Still, a dude 1-2 inches taller than you is taller not shorter than you. And yeah, obviously short dudes are in the minority? So what? I disagree that women "require" 3 inches plus. Well, most women do. It is al…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 08:20 AM
1

Isn't that the same for anyone who isn't attractive? We were talking about a specific dynamic, which adds a lot to this. It's not like all tall women look like supermodels, so they're obviously insecure about something that makes them stand out in a not so common way for women. Most of them are probably not even that insecure. Most tall women I knew and know did not / do not seem that insecure. At least not due to their height. I really don't believe so. I don't think we'll agree on this. Statis…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 08:17 AM
5

Finally, a nonhypergamous female. Not guaranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 08:00 AM
5

Feminists will just downplay the importance of female pedophilia and even promote it if they have to So disgusting. That ideology needs to go.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/21 07:52 AM
1

I know, but I was thinking online dating is the only place where people actually list heights and outright reject based on it That is obviously false. Yeah, but the average height for men in the U.S. is 5'9 whereas for women it's 5'4. This varies all over the world, but it's pretty constant overall that men are taller than women. Your point? Short men are not of average height, that right there is most of their problems in dating. Even 1 inch would be taller, but women require generally 3 inches…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 07:39 AM
1

In a relationship, though? Yes? The less attractive you are as a man, the harder your relationships are. Tall women who don't appear as waif-like white supermodels (or: a beauty standard), are definitely insecure about being feminine because most women aren't taller than most men. They are still less insecure about that. Which makes sense. I don't see many men attracted to women taller than them. What do you base this on? Most men care way less about this than women. Not really, imo. 3 inches is…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 07:37 AM
1

Online dating is much more shallow and looks-based I was talking in general. Just that, oh, he's taller than me, Meaning 3 inches plus.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 07:30 AM
0

Why did you make me eat downvotes?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 07:13 AM
0

And eating.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 07:07 AM
1

What hobbies are you then talking about? Eating?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:54 AM
0

So you are saying women are inferior? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:50 AM
3

It is like prostitution without putting out. Nothing deranged about pointing that out. Going on a date with such entitled, backwards women is like paying for the pleasure of being judged by some random escort who then can do whatever the fuck she wants. A waste of money and time.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:44 AM
6

Men expect orgasms every time—and get them. Not true. People in this thread here already told you that much. But when women want pleasure, they're entitled You expect to starfish and expect the man to do all the work. And that after he has paid for the "pleasure" of being with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:41 AM
6

You sound entitled as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:37 AM
4

And their victims often have to pay child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:37 AM
2

and women go for beta guys below their league Who says those dudes are below her leaque? Lol at women flattering themselves like that. money Iirc studies show that women have more orgasms when their partner is rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:35 AM
3

and paying for dates isn't the same as paying for SEX Yes, it is way dumber. It's not sexist to ask men to pay for VOLUNTARY dates It is. You are trying to enforce and defend sexist gender roles. If you do not want to go on a date, just say no. If you have to be paid for your time for something like this, you are not much different from a whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:30 AM
17

Emotional: men actually have emotions as well. This seems to be such a foreign concept to sooooo many women. Confirms "the red pill" too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 06:28 AM
1

I'd argue that most short men would feel threatened by a much taller woman themselves Because of how women treat short/er men some of those men do not want to risk having to deal with this bullshit. and tall women are just as insecure about their height. Bullshit. Also, tall women have it way better than short men. (but I know some who aren't handsome will take what they can get, but I'm talking attraction), Nah, many men can easily be attracted to a taller woman. Most of them are on average ~3-…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 05:58 AM
1

I think the requirement for the majority of women is just “be taller than me”. It doesn’t matter by how much. Nah, it has to be a few inches.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 05:57 AM
3

Well, obviously a woman's posture, movements, gestures, etc etc all significantly influence how a man perceives said woman. That so many people here downplay this... lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/21 06:17 AM
1

1 in 10 men. I asked if it was common, so it is not. That is all I got from that statistic. Sounds literally like you were aiming to belittle the issue from the beginning. What number btw would you need to consider it common? though under further inspection, at least in the United States, nearly 1 in 5 women have been raped at some point in their lives. That statistic includes alleged attempts and sexual assault, based on the ''research'' of someone who does not believe that men can be raped by …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 09:38 PM
1

Comparatively low social status and basically guaranteed inceldom. And he had some of the best social skills I have seen, too (those who have a huge burden of performance often develop some of the best skills and ideas etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 08:15 PM
1

What did I say that made you make that remark about women and the empathetic gender? The way you hand-waved this huge issue away. Yes, it’s more common than rape according to that statistic, but that does not make it “worse than rape”. What did I say to make you believe that this is the reason I think it is worse than rape? Just reading my comment alone would tell you that this is not the case. If you are so worried and mistrustful, first of all, demand a paternity test. Most men are naive about…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 08:15 PM
2

For their entire life, they were doing something wrong. I knew a redhead dude who was facially unattractive and like 5'1'' here in Germany. The way he was treated was not his fault. With all of that being said, hating women won't help. We had an AMA here with an expert incel. He described very well how this stuff can help a lot with coping with your life, and how changing these attitudes often does not make much sense for really ugly etc incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 08:01 PM
1

For some people neither are realistically feasible. The same goes for when you are too short. Also, there comes a point where investments and returns are just ridiculously loop-sided. And then it might make more sense to vent your frustrations on the internet ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:57 PM
3

Reddit does not work properly and your comment there got posted twice. I was just being "funny".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:56 PM
2

Yeah, and this is a huge problem. Tons of people not getting their deserved punishments and instead repeating their garbage behaviors, while others have to suffer for it unnecessarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:54 PM
3

Once was enough to make this known.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:52 PM
2

Some of the relevant, very important aspects of ourselves are not changeable. No need to gaslight those less fortunate than us.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:52 PM
0

Yeah, most men do not report rapes committed by women because they are not going to be taken seriously. Also, they might come under attack by Feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:49 PM
3

You really went all out there, Mr. Lawyer ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:48 PM
1

On the other hand that lots of exculpatory evidence is left to rot too. Which causes e.g. "random" black men to get basically imprisoned for their skin color.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:47 PM
6

I also heard softer versions. Men claiming things like that in the past, if you acted like a man you would have to have been able to back it up accordingly. Meaning some of the disrespects women engage in would have gotten them beaten just like they have gotten weaker men beaten. The latter still happens today in many scenarios.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:42 PM
1

If he is thinking of the same user as I do, they were just saying that every man has a capacity for these things given the right conditions. I certainly think virtually everyone is capable of at least the second two. For rape itself, the conditions might amount to them being forced to do it, which could be considered to be meaningfully different from a "capacity" of forcing oneself onto someone unwilling out of one's own volition.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:41 PM
2

There are even women who claim to be sexually attracted to intelligence. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:29 PM
2

That is extremely common. It is basically worse than rape, and more common too. Lol @ women being the empathic gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:22 PM
6

Not possible. Not with that attitude. I'm someone who know women who have an Asian guy fetish thanks to the influx of Asian entertainment. Lol. So how many of those women exist compared to the amount of Asian dudes we got, and how many of them go for average Asian dudes? All this kind of reminds me of those women who like tall Hispanics, which does not do much to help the average Mexican. Lastly, how many of them are actually in relationships with average Asian dudes? The truth is supply and dem…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 07:13 PM
2

Why else would they find it? Because some people demonize "the redpill" causing others to go to their subreddit and then see that it makes a lot of sense to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 06:44 PM
2

Ok, lol. Tbh I think you should work on that attitude of yours. It is not healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 06:42 PM
2

There are people here who say that they base their entire self worth on their sexual or romantic appeal, and assets like family and friendships and careers have no importance to them unless they aid towards the aforementioned. Never saw this sentiment expressed this extremely.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 05:48 AM
2

I am not who you think I am!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 05:33 AM
2

Being dark triad is part of those men's charisma.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 04:44 AM
4

Meanwhile nerdy, introverted assholes (yes Reddit they do in fact exist) Majority of reddit users.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 04:42 AM
2

They are too weak. That is why their bloodlines will vanish!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 04:42 AM
0

You know (you don't), I know plenty of people who say this kind of stuff. And then you validate them a bit and it is pretty obvious that it impacts them, and that it -over time- even influences their behavior. Edit: Downvoting is against the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 04:09 AM
–

Well, I addressed most of what you wrote already in this thread, so you will hopefully forgive me if I do not address it again. just as a man could be good looking/attractive despite not being necessarily tall Funny way to phrase this. OP is saying that less shallow women exist. She claimed that the majority of women is not shallow. And that is just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 04:01 AM
–

Nah, plenty of women pretend not to be shallow. We literally have women here in this subreddit who try to redefine basic words like "shallow".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 03:57 AM
3

And downvote me, which is against the sub's rules :) and no replies countering my point, just downvotes :) lol. They are being pretty red-pilled here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 03:13 AM
1

Virtually everybody does it now and then, and for attractive men there is a subset of women that will basically throw this kind of validation at them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 03:05 AM
3

Pretty sure that is a human universal. At least here in Europe it is common too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 02:58 AM
2

Well, she mentioned the hair color thing. Most women do not like it when men color their hair (notice her reaction when that other user mentioned it as being under men's control, comparing it to getting plastic surgery lol). Men are supposed to be as "natural" as possible so women can judge them, while women can literally wear 5 kg of makeup and 4 inch ++ heels and then delude themselves into thinking that the outcome of that is their actual value. Also, she probably did not mention height becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 02:56 AM
1

They look like misformed dwarfs Sounds like most fds users, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 01:23 AM
1

There are degrees of insecurity. And depending on the degree of insecurity it might make no sense to call them "insecure". Especially given that we were talking about attractive men. I suppose the vast majority of them is not very insecure. In other words, "all cheaters (or most, because you have to account for sociopaths and other oddities) are insecure" does not imply "all insecure people are cheaters" Did I claim anything like that? I just doubt that most men (including more averageish ones) …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 01:20 AM
2

Or men and women are different? Highly attractive women often have high standards and are in relationships with highly attractive men. Most men around them are probably not even an option to them, and cheating with somebody less attractive than your main partner generally (I am simplifying a bit here) does not make much sense evolutionary from a "female's" perspective, whereas generally the opposite is true for "males". I think it's something else, like insecurity or social conditioning of some …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 01:18 AM
0

Why is this about me and my level of security? I'm secure enough to not debase myself, but not so secure that external validation means nothing to me. So why is this possible for you, but not for cheating men? And inb4 you claim that them cheating means they are debasing themselves, that is obviously not necessarily true. They might like the validation without being insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 01:06 AM
1

You do not like it when people "affirm your value"?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 12:58 AM
2

The attractive men. So it makes sense that they might be more likely to cheat, all else being equal. Also, while we are at it, unattractive women probably perceive more men to be attractive enough to sleep with, so they too have more options.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 12:55 AM
5

Nah, that would be shallow (I care more about other shallow things). Nothing wrong with admitting that. And it would not be a preference, but a requirement. Nothing wrong with admitting that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 12:37 AM
10

They just want to maintain the illusions of male hyper-agency and female "moral superiority" so they grasp at whatever straws are available to them. Edit: Also, those women who are into k poop are basically into men that are very different from average Asian dudes to begin with. Tall, often with faces changed by plastic surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 12:30 AM
–

How many average women is he going after? Multiple thousands. Yes there are. Tons? Yeah no. Time for him to get into anime, Kpop, and K-Dramas. Especially the korean stuff. Are you an Asian man who tried this? If yes, how old are you? Also, sounds like some nice guy covert contract bullshit pretending to like something just so that you maybe able to sleep with a few women that would like to objectify you in a very specific, and weird, way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 12:19 AM
-3

You might like validation regardless of whether you are insecure. Also, what therapists? Lots of therapy is gynocentric bs. Literally worthless to many men (and if you have to go make sure to see a non-feminist man).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 12:09 AM
–

There's tons of white girls who fuck asian dudes Yeah no. Especially not exclusively. and men make those racial preferences too. Like with almost everything else, men care less about this than women, on average. I just go find people who think I'm attractive. Easy to say for a woman. Not easy if you are an averageish Asian dude in the West.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 12:06 AM
0

To put things in perspective, average men never, ever experience the flirtatious curiosity of average women You are slightly exaggerating here. If you are within average range, some women will perceive you to be better than average because you fit their type etc. There's no evidence that women are open to interacting with men they perceive to be equals What do you mean by interacting?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:58 PM
–

Another reason why unattractive men absolutely should be "red-pilled".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:54 PM
2

Their requirements are also generally lower, so more acceptable partners around.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:53 PM
–

I do think insecurity is a huge piece of it though. Sounds like female projection. Not saying it never happens, but this seems to be more a thing for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:53 PM
–

They have more options.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:50 PM
–

female circle jerkers avert their eyes at once
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:50 PM
–

If you rule out the majority of men based on "shallow" criteria alone, leading you to find up to ~ 80 % of men to be unattractive or something like that, then requiring a little bit more of something else does not make you any less shallow. It only makes you look picky, and maybe entitled. We just claim that we require a bit more than just being hot. In reality most women have no issues sleeping with men for their looks alone. At best, AWALT is It is similar to assuming that all guns are always …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:33 PM
30

Many women just redefine "shallowness" according to their convenience. Just like how they leave out all kinds of stuff from their n-count.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:31 PM
–

Men are shallow too then. Pretty sure that is well-known. It is virtually always women who pretend to not be shallow, and who exaggerate the degree of men's shallowness (prob partially due to projection).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:29 PM
–

Everyone who judges based on anything except personality alone is shallow? At least to some degree. How I would "judge" this also depends on how important those shallow things are to the person in question. Then it shouldn't be seen as a bad thing. It really depends. But yeah, I do not think that shallowness is always bad. Also I never said that women should exclude men automatically based on height. That is shallow, as is excluding automatically based on tit size Sounds different from: Women wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter