TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mr8bittripper Archive

View 1 post and 58 comments by Mr8bittripper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
86

GeneralMr8bittripper/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:24 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It took a lot of learning for me to be great at sex yeah but there’s a lot of women who think laying there is what guys want but then again some guys do I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 09:12 AM
5

I wish r/incels was still a sub so I didn’t have to see you here. This sub in general is full of a lot of pathetic incels. You know em when you see em
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 03:13 AM
-2

Transphobes suck including you. “End of discussion” my ass
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:44 AM
-1

You conflated me saying “cis” has a definition hundreds of years old with ’no one has called normal men ‘cis’ for hundreds of years.’ You built a strawman, transphobe!
/r/MensRights28/02/23 12:42 AM
-7

Fuck you transphobe
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:20 PM
2

You can’t say I’m being disingenuous if your argument is asking me to consider something I didn’t know. That being said, trans women are not men who want to be women. They are women! Do you agree?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:03 PM
-12

Lol you think the word cis shouldn’t be used even though it is perfectly applicable Wonder what kinds of ulterior motives you have
/r/MensRights27/02/23 05:28 PM
4

It has a definition: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender
/r/MensRights27/02/23 04:30 PM
-17

I’m cis, but I don’t play the fucking victim like you do. I support transgender people who are disproportionately victims of discrimination and violent crimes. Trans rights rule! The word cis has a fucking definition that has existed for hundreds of years
/r/MensRights27/02/23 04:28 PM
2

I’m cis and I don’t PLAY THE FUCKING VICTIM! Trans rights rule!
/r/MensRights27/02/23 04:27 PM
-24

Why not? It has a definition that has existed for hundreds of years. Are you transphobic by chance?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 04:25 PM
3

Transphobia sucks. Be better
/r/MensRights27/02/23 04:24 PM
0

And there’s the transphobia… Choosing something to get attention
/r/MensRights05/02/23 06:06 PM
3

I’m not an asshole but I have been very successful with women
/r/MensRights14/01/23 05:03 AM
1

I agree with you on that
/r/MensRights07/01/23 11:55 PM
-1

Yeah totally not a group people SELF-IDENTIFY with………..🤡
/r/MensRights07/01/23 11:54 PM
1

I’m a member of mensrights and have been for a long time. I believe in the cause
/r/MensRights07/01/23 06:46 PM
1

I think mensrights is getting super insular and bitter when we could be focusing on ways to build better inroads and be a more positive community. I remember when we didn’t need to fabricate women’s opinions to get our points across.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 05:49 PM
-1

I believe you are right. I think this sub is becoming too reactionary however thats my concern
/r/MensRights07/01/23 05:47 PM
1

Maybe I am wrong. Cause I do remember that time but now it feels like people are just mad instead of doing the best thing they can, building inroads to convince people of truth
/r/MensRights07/01/23 05:46 PM
-12

I’m making a comment about the sorry state of this sub as compared to a few years ago. There used to be solidarity now its hopelessness.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:26 PM
-17

I’m a man discussing things on the internet
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:14 PM
-44

Holy shit mens rights is becoming r/ incels i don’t remember this sub having such a high level of victim complex
/r/MensRights07/01/23 09:23 AM
-15

Fuck yourself transphobe
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:14 PM
-21

Fuck religion and fuck transphobes
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:13 PM
-10

I don’t understand how its sexist to say ONE man has a small dick
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:06 AM
-13

I legit do not know what this subreddit has become. Obviously Andrew Tate makes his whole thing about how men should be strong and act tough, wouldn’t that involve being able to take that kind of insult?? Also, projection is a thing. But why are people defending andrew tate here? He’s a prime example of toxic masculinity at its worst. Don’t we all want to be positive role models for other men? Don’t we want to lift each other up and expose societal inequality against men? Andrew tate doesn’t do …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:05 AM
-4

Since when was mensrights anti-trans? I mean really? If you’re mad I said this please say it’s not true instead of proving my point
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:16 PM
12

Thats more fanatic than funny
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:15 PM
5

True I guess at that point take it upon yourself to do whatever you’re doing to get back at them if you really believe in revenge that much personally I’m just out of there
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:39 AM
9

Consider the fact that her boyfriend may not of cheated
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:21 AM
2

Glad he couldn’t create them the way he wanted to originally and now has to rely on us to make them right except many people still have foreskin would you call that not “in good condition?”
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:16 PM
1

I would try to defeat him in combat; if he was real he’d be evil.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:15 PM
3

Does the foreskin have nerve endings in it? The answer to that question will help you.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:04 AM
1

God cannot effectively be empirically proven to exist
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:01 AM
8

Wow. You disgust me
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:59 AM
-2

I’m atheist and vegan and I’m not better, my ideology is.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:48 AM
2

People like you give me hope. Thank you so much for caring enough to think about it
/r/MensRights27/02/19 09:05 AM
2

I see what you are saying... but why pick this hill to die on? Whatever benefits that you talk of are stupidly outweighed by the other benefits of keeping it. I would even argue that because you are taking away benefits of a different incomparable aspect, saying that there are benefits of another aspect is misleading enough to serve no purpose, and most importantly ignores the entire issue.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:50 PM
5

Good job trying to change the definition of mutilation! You failed.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:35 PM
3

It’s not meaningless; it has function and people enjoy it! You are an idiot.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:30 PM
5

So is it a net loss or not?
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:31 PM
2

They used logic and reason to disprove your argument; namely that if a certain (ANY) part of the body benefited (has a function) it in any way and it was healthy, there are no benefits to be gained from removing it. Foreskin is not a detriment to the body! If it has a function, which it does (many) and it’s healthy, yeah... it would be just like cutting away any other tissue that qualifies as that. The act and justification for the act are morally wrong! Fuck off
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:24 PM
5

So you are anti-circumcision but you don’t think it’s a net loss?? What the hell are you saying then? Why play both sides?
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:16 PM
1

It’s amazing you think he’s being sarcastic, he’s just showing studies that should ideally have never been done with conclusions that are subjective and ultimately apologist.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:14 PM
4

Excuse me? What the flying fuck is “Real genital mutilation?” You probably can’t even answer me because you are so wrapped in your own facetiously disgusting justification. How would women feel if a prosecutor told them: “Sorry, we can’t press charges; it’s not real genital mutilation.” You are an insult to humanity itself!
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:09 PM
6

He didn’t twist your words, he used the exact same ones you used. It helps his case just fine! You will not diminish this. Removing nerve endings from one of the most sensitive areas of the male body is barbarically unnecessary and should be the choice of the person inside the body. You claim it’s meaningless?? Why sit here and discuss it? Obviously you feel strongly about it and obviously it’s not meaningless to you!
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:05 PM
5

It isn’t even medically necessary: http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/dewan/
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:15 AM
25

Here’s a downvote. By definition it is.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 07:04 AM
13

Care to elaborate or would you prefer to stick to your kneejerk response?
/r/MensRights26/12/18 07:03 AM
36

Oh boy here we go... Yes there is. It is literally missing nerve endings on one of the most sensitive areas of the male body, all done for stupid reasons! How could there be nothing wrong with it; people feel violated as they should! How dare you say it is not wrong; it is a human rights violation!
/r/MensRights26/12/18 05:07 AM
2

Oh my goodness you love to take what I say out of context! It’s not communistic to say that people shouldn’t hurt each other! Idiot!
/r/MensRights24/07/18 03:15 AM
1

Parents have no right to mutilate their child. To say this is to defend circumcision. You are enabling circumcision! Just because something is similar to communism doesn’t mean it is bad. Violating the rights of a human for no reason is wrong no matter what and indefensible. Your solution is akin to letting people do it to their innocent kid “if they want.” Get the fuck out of here with that disgusting bullshit! No one gives a fuck about “education” if they think their religion tells them it’s r…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:41 AM
3

I said nothing about government or communism at all. Parents do not have the right to raise their children “as they see fit;” it is immoral and wrong to harm someone for no reason! This has nothing to do with communism at all. It has to do with human rights. Again, how can circumcision be anything but harm?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 09:50 AM
4

Stripping parents of their rights?? No parent has the right to harm their child whatsoever! How can circumcision be any different than harm?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 09:33 AM
–

You cannot make someone a victim of a crime you did not commit. It should be obvious that condoning circumcision in any way is a detriment to the cause, and is a very shallow-minded thing to do. Morally wrong.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:02 PM
17

I just want to point out that I have never posted or commented at r/rape. but yet they indirectly accuse me of undermining their cause, just because I'm subscribed to r/mensrights. The moderators are claiming I deserve a ban, and banning me in the same moment, because a subreddit I'm subscribed to has "harassed" them.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:46 PM
–

Giving credence to people who prefer circumcised men assists in a worldview that will never end circumcision; most people in the U.S. (where the problem of male genital mutilation is most prevalent) seem to agree with/have no qualms with/are already circumcised themselves. Here is a question for you: If talking about the human rights violation "also harms circumcised men," to you, then you really need to re-evaluate what "harm" really means. Babies are harmed each day when a huge portion of thei…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter