TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrAnalog Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by MrAnalog on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Meg Jay does give good advice, but the dead silence from the audience when she starts sharing some hard facts tells you everything about how well it goes over. Lead balloons, anyone?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/19 09:25 PM
64

Men are "dropping out" of society for two reasons. First, many of the roads that led to the middle class have been closed. Entire industries have been crated up and shipped overseas. Second, marriage has been gutted to the point that a spouse can be better described as "a roommate you have to pay a fortune to have evicted." As far as the decline goes, reflect on the following: The overwhelming majority of government revenue is collected from men. The overwhelming majority of government benefits …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:54 PM
12

I disagree. A few months after Two X became a default subreddit, one of the top comments was a plea for women who posted their abortion stories to avoid mentioning how they became pregnant in the first place. The moderators agreed and made the necessary rule changes. Why? Well, most of the abortion stories from users began with some version of "I always use birth control, except when I don't." Even worse, a majority of the "exceptions" were when the woman was cheating on her partner. The users a…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:00 PM
5

The point of destroying the nuclear family is to split men and women into separate voting blocs. Thanks to no-fault divorce, the repeal of adultery laws, lopsided family courts, and the insane notion that sex and marriage have nothing to do with each other, the modern "husband" has been reduced to a mere roommate. Why should a modern wife bother to vote for her husband's interests? If she's unsatisfied, she can just find another man, have an affair, throw her husband away like trash, and walk aw…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:55 AM
2

As to how Trump happened, this two and a half minute long cartoon explains most of it. The two main takeaways from the video: 1 The org chart that gets sawn in half. In the original HD, you can see that the removed section includes labels like "OSHA," "child labor laws," and "40 hour work week." 2 The video was made in 2005. Eleven full years before Trump. Anyone acting shocked that a nationalist could be elected is either not paying attention or trying to bullshit someone. The rest of Trump is …
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:05 AM
19

Given how many "by women, for women" articles on sex and relationships I've seen that read like something straight out of the Red Pill, I'm not sure if I would call TRP "Cosmo for Men." In fact, I recall reading something like marrying your bofriend vs. marrying your husband that captured nearly all of TRP concepts. The only real difference is that the boyfriend section was written like erotic fan fiction. Hell, even devout feminist Sheryl Sandberg's statement on dating sounds like something you…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:24 AM
25

It's just one more example of the left taking their collective moral compass and smashing it with a sledgehammer. For decades, the left condemned "you have no rights on private property" as the epitome of psychotic libertarianism. But in the wake of an election loss, they have embraced no-platforming with a religious fervor. And that's not all. Pop in to a leftist echo chamber like the politics sub and be shocked by the discussions of what needs to happen after 2020 to "destroy the fascists." Yo…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:01 AM
2

Almost every man has had a woman talk down to him because he was a man, whether it was in a kitchen, a laundry room or elsewhere. Therefore if "mansplaining" exists, then "womansplaining" must also exist. As an example from my own life, I worked my way through college as a line cook. By the time I graduated, I had earned the title of chef. But that has certainly not stopped most of the women I've dated from trying to kick me out of my own kitchen on the basis of "everyone knows men can't cook." …
/r/MensRights07/09/17 09:22 PM
1

The word you were looking for is "effect," and you are completely off base concerning the magnitude thereof. From Wikipedia again: A statistically significant correlation has been found between the usage rate of leaded gasoline and violent crime: taking into account a 22-year time lag, the violent crime curve virtually tracks the lead exposure curve. Indeed, the ban on leaded gasoline is believed to be responsible for a nearly 60 percent drop in crime from 1992 to 2002. Not to mention a consider…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 11:03 PM
1

The addition of tetraethyllead to gasoline as an anti knock agent began to be phased out in 1973. Lead is a toxic metal that accumulates in the body and is associated with subtle and insidious neurotoxic effects especially at low exposure levels, such as low IQ and antisocial behavior. It has particularly harmful effects on children. These concerns eventually led to the ban on TEL in automobile gasoline in many countries. -- Wikipedia
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 10:27 PM
4

Alternative title: "Canadian Liberals initiate changes to sexual-assault laws to bar exculpatory evidence from criminal trials."
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:23 PM
11

Controlling for hours worked would flip the pay gap around in favor of women.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 02:04 PM
4

It's not even opinion, it's outright fabrication. The entire article is "things that totally for certain happened" material.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:18 AM
2

Doing away with the presumption of innocence will make our society worse, not better. And it would not be a change that helps women, but rather one that harms them.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 01:50 AM
1

So, you want to replace the court system with something out of The Scarlet Letter?
/r/MensRights13/03/16 01:40 AM
3

What you and your cohorts are doing is not progress. It is authoritarianism. The excuses are different, but the goal is unchanged. And yes, the ignorance on display in your posting is risible. The principle behind Blackstone's Formulation, that "All presumptive evidence of felony should be admitted cautiously; for the law holds it better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent party suffer," is ancient. The same sentiment can be found in the Bible and the Koran. It has been a foun…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 01:36 AM
3

This is a result of the fact that civics is no longer a required class in high school. An entire generation of snot-nosed little shits who have no knowledge of Blackstone's Formulation, have never read The Federalist Papers, can't enumerate the first ten Amendments, and believe that rights are granted at the whim of the government. Is it any wonder that feminist discourse is so far removed from reality? These risible imbeciles lack even the most basic understanding of the foundation our society …
/r/MensRights13/03/16 01:14 AM
11

I think it's worth noting that the judge in this case, Gregory Woods, was appointed by Barack Obama on the recommendation of Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY). It is hardly surprising that he would rule that Title IX is essentially a law to benefit women. Current "it girl" feminist Rebecca Traister, author of All the Single Ladies, has brazenly asserted that the American left is aggressively courting the women's vote in order to impose their political agenda. The leaders of the Democratic party una…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 12:25 AM
9

From the "article:" Women should have 50 percent of power in every area of life, if not more (reparations!). In other words, we want everything to be equal, except for those things we already get the better deal on. All of feminism explained in a single sentence.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 11:32 PM
17

The writer clearly doesn't remember the days when the soap aisle was home to nothing but products for women, save for a few unisex and "brand x" products. I hate to be that guy, but "back in my day," you were lucky to find more than a handful of items that didn't smell like a florist's garbage can. It still amazes me that it took so long for manufacturers to realize that most men didn't want to walk around smelling like "strawberry-lilac-baby powder" all day.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:43 PM
13

A lot of pop culture feminism can be summed up as "blame someone else for the choices you regret." Go to a party half naked and fully drunk looking to hook up with your crush, but somehow wake up with the wrong guy? Obviously, you were raped. It's not your fault. Spend five years in college partying towards your totally awesome and not at all useless degree, and then don't get a fantastic white collar job right after graduation? That's because the industry is a boy's club. You're not to blame. F…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:34 PM
13

You forgot: who pays the lion's share of taxes. As I have stated before, the left uses feminism to persuade women to vote themselves the benefits they would otherwise get from marriage. The implication underlying the article is that the (democrat) government will solve all of these "problems." Presumably by giving women free shit, and having men foot the bill.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:09 PM
1

I disagree that having all of your expenses paid by someone else is a sacrifice. Something feminists - and many women - tend to overlook while bleating that they haven't been compensated for things like housework and childcare is that they have indeed been paid for that. Rent, utilities, internet, cell phones, clothing, food, transportation, insurance, entertainment... None of that is free, and having someone else foot the bill is actually a massive benefit. Calling it a sacrifice is disingenuou…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:53 PM
9

From the linked article, emphasis mine: Case 1: Wife married at 19, husband at 26. They have been married 20 years, and have three kids. The husband gets custody. Husband has 7 years more education than the wife, and they live in a fault state. Wife is white. Probability that wife files = .095. However, if the wife got custody, the probability that she would file increases to .69. Case 2: They married when they were both 26, and have been married 5 years. They have two children, and the wife wil…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:40 PM
3

The stupid in that article is so dangerous, the State of California would put a warning label on it.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:58 AM
2

Is there a reason you are so opposed to single marriage and the nuclear family?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:50 AM
-1

We do.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:41 AM
4

That does make a useful metric for deciding which group you belong to, doesn't it? Everything's fine... Men's Lib Everything is not burning, yet... Men's Rights Everything is on fire... Men Going Their Own Way Everything is on fire, let's roast some marshmallows... The Red Pill
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:39 AM
0

Perhaps so. Or perhaps a system similar to the one outlined in Starship Troopers, where full citizenship must be earned with service. But again, my point was that the institutions feminism is trying to destroy actually work better than their proposed alternatives. Can the nuclear family be improved? Maybe. Replaced? No.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:34 AM
0

Enlightenment Ideals.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:26 AM
0

I am using "democracy" in its strict classical sense as a method of government....not in its broad modern sense as a euphemism for a free society That's fine, but Churchill clearly was not, and neither was I. My point was that while many of our enduring social institutions are flawed in some way, they have proven to work better than anything else we have tried. And given the number of alternatives we have tried, I find it unlikely that we shall find better any time soon.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:17 AM
1

Our government was founded in line with Enlightenment ideals, which can be summed as "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Democracy, individual rights, private property, limitation on government power, and the system of checks and balances were all put forth by Enlightenment thinkers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment#Politics
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:01 AM
1

No offense, but claiming that capitalism does not exist because it has never been seen in an abstract, theoretically pure form is akin to claiming that the United States is not a democracy because citizens do not directly vote on policy. Would it help if I had said "free market" or "market driven" economy instead? As far as plural marriage goes, it is different from homosexuality in kind and in scale. Homosexuals make up a tiny fraction of the total population, and generally partner with each ot…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:54 AM
4

The United States is a constitutional republic and representative democracy. The fact that citizens do not vote on policy directly does not mean that the country was not founded on democratic ideals.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 12:42 AM
9

While not perfect for everyone, in the context of our society, single marriage is better than the alternative. Polygamy, and specifically polygyny, tends to result in a lot of single men who have no hope of marriage. That is clearly a problem.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:05 PM
3

The destruction of the nuclear family in favor of the state as parent has been a primary goal of feminism since Engels published The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State back in 1884. Given that Engels was the co-founder of Marxism, I would call that left wing.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 10:41 PM
10

Churchill once said that ""Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." And he was correct. Democracy is an imperfect system. Not everyone is satisfied with the decisions of the majority, and many feel under served. Even Locke and Hobbes recognized that democracy has limitations. And yet, it is still the best we have. And just like democracy, capitalism, the nuclear family, single marriage, the gendered division of labor, an…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 10:35 PM
32

The list of demands in the original article perfectly illustrate why feminism is the darling ideology of the political left. Feminism pressures women to remain single by advocating laws and policies that hobble men, in the hope that women will vote themselves the benefits that usually come from marriage. And as we all know, a government that can give you everything you want can take everything you have. And the sad truth is that most women have no idea of what is really happening. A common refra…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 09:11 PM
4

The time frame is wrong, but your description of the contents sounds remarkably like Hit Him Where It Hurts by Sherri Donovan. Which is a nasty little book catering to women who want to completely eviscerate their soon-to-be former husbands. To give you an idea, it uses the metaphor of divorce as boxing match. Sadly, there are an enormous number of books out there like the one you are looking for. A quick search for "divorce guides for women" on Amazon returned thousands of results. And a distur…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:16 AM
23

It's as if the women asking "where all the good men have gone," didn't read The Ant and the Grasshopper. Many women want to end up with a successful man but don't want to share the effort involved in getting there. Whatever happened to the notion of building a life with your partner together? ...a twenty year old woman meets a man. He is not very well dressed, lives with roommates, doesn't own his own car, and works as a wage slave to help with expenses while he attends school. Her reaction? She…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:09 AM
4

No, she was banned for re-introducing complexity into a flattened narrative. It is an unfortunate truth that many of the facts feminists point to in order to justify their claims of patriarchy or oppression have been completely stripped of detail and context. Pointing out that the real world is far more complicated than feminists often portray it as is strictly forbidden. The claim was "best female athlete refused sponsorship for not being pretty enough," and Gronk replied "maybe it's not that s…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 10:13 PM
17

The destruction of the nuclear family has been a goal of the authoritarian left since Engels published The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, if not before. It is no coincidence that a leftist movement such as feminism seeks to destroy the notion of "father" in favor of relegating men to sperm donors and wallets. Shaming men for being involved with their children is part and parcel of the movement.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 09:43 PM
6

I think this is a good illustration of the fact that what feminists call "patriarchy" is created and enforced entirely by women. Complaining that men earn more, on average, than women while the overwhelming majority of women would refuse to date or marry men who earn less money is disingenuous, to say the least. To be blunt, if women want to rid the world of "toxic masculinity," they should stop rewarding men who are "toxic" with sex and marriage.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 06:31 PM
32

They already do, but their version of a mid-life crisis is waking up one day and suddenly realizing that they do want children, and have to have them right now. So, instead of buying a fast car, they begin hunting for a husband. And complaining that all of the "good men" are gone, and it's just so unfair. Like this gem from TwoX.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 06:10 PM
81

This is exactly the case. In fact, there is a thread on the front page of TwoX right now titled "I'm turning 40... no relationship, no children, no hope" The thread is the embodiment of "Where have all the good men gone?" Why is this so hard? I'm funny, smart, objectively cute, am in shape and look younger than my age. What can I do differently? My birthday is approaching and I feel like a door is closing to a room that I've never been allowed to visit. She makes it clear that she is unwilling t…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 06:06 PM
5

I had to relocate for work, and she understood that before we started the relationship. It was, unfortunately, something we both knew would never be permanent. And yes, it was frightening. But more than that, it was deeply insulting. The thought process is just insane. Oh, look at this guy lying on the exam table while his pretty blonde girlfriend holds his hand. He's going to need about thirty stitches, and he'll have a black eye for weeks. I bet he hits her. Let's find out! This is why we don'…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:32 AM
6

The situation is even worse than you might think. When a man walks into a hospital with a bloody face, no one asks "Who did this to you?" they just ask, "What happened?" and will take whatever bullshit answer the man gives. Story time. A few years ago, my ex girlfriend and I were helping some friends move into their new apartment. I was helping carry a dresser upstairs when the idiot on the other end lost his grip, and I got my face clocked hard. The skin above my temple split, and I obviously n…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:07 AM
8

And Marsha McLeod would like to bring The Scarlet Letter to this century. When leftists speak of "restorative justice", they mean public shaming, shunning, and excommunication. The difference is that it would be endorsed by the government, rather than simply plastered all over the currently trendy social media sites. Just imagine being forced to wear a large capital letter - or perhaps a star - in order to warn the rest of society that you are one of the untouchables. Or better yet, imagine the …
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter