TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrAwesomo92 Archive

View 2 posts and 191 comments by MrAwesomo92 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
993

MrAwesomo92/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/16 10:59 PM
5

re: FeminismMrAwesomo92/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:33 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You do realize Robin Williams went into severe depression because he had to pay child support based on one of his highest earning years and he could make payments later on due to difficulty finding work. Robin Williams wasnt the only one affected by this level of fuckery.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 01:24 PM
1

A child might be a responsibility, but you shouldnt need to give up more than is needed to raise the child, because it is "child support" not "mom support"
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 12:39 PM
1

If this was the case, it would be absolutely insane. You are basically saying that every time someone rich wants to have sex, they should be prepared to give up half their fortune so that the potential kid doesn't choose them over the poorer parent. That is absolutely absurd. Gold diggers dont need protection.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 03:07 AM
1

I highly doubt that a kid chooses their parent solely based on income. If that is the case, the kid needs some counselling and someone to teach them some values. Not for the other parent to be able to legally steal.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 02:47 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKfm723mISo Well, I dont know so much about the US case and your cases sound quite sad. However, here is a case where a son wants to live with his father. His mother got custody regardless. Pussypass, maybe
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 01:55 PM
2

Because a child's quality of life should not suffer or be degraded You think that a child will suffer or be degraded if their parents dont spend 100k or more per year on them? Who do you think that much money will be spent on, the kid or the mom? There should definately be a cap You also don't want to encourage a child to always pick the wealthiest parent Since when do kids pick their parents? And courts determine custody rights, whether joint or sole custody, not children being bribed by toys..…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 11:15 AM
8

Why does child support need to be income based. Kids dont need millions, or even hundreds of thousands a year to live off of.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 09:02 AM
19

It is still bullshit. You dont have to be a stay at home mom, that is quite a privilege. And after the divorce, sure maybe it would be ok to get alimony for several years in order to be able to get back on their feet, but not for the rest of their life. Nobody should be entitled to someone else's labor and be able to freeride. ...and these two had no kids
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 08:55 AM
3

He's a white male, get him!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 05:06 PM
25

Trolling people that get offended easily is just about my favorite thing in the world. It makes me soo happy.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/16 11:15 AM
1

Cool story bro, tell it again
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/16 06:40 AM
3

Think how much more cool stuff we would have if all humans contributed to the economy and were educated from the start and not just men. If you dont realize, women havent been attending schools for too long in the course of history. And why do you care which "group" fares better. You are not nearly as smart as, for example Janet Yellen, not nearly as influencial as Margret Thatcher, not nearly as hard of a worker as Marissa Meyer, etc, yet you lump yourself into the same group as Einstein and Bi…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 11:47 PM
2

What is going on?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 02:23 PM
2

Are you 6? Because I remember the last time I had a debate about boys being better than girls/girls being better than boys, I was in kindergarden.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 08:57 AM
6

Then dont watch it
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/16 04:14 PM
1

Can you see it for individual comments?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/16 08:21 PM
1

How do you see what percentage is downvotes?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/16 08:03 PM
10

FreeKeene.com features audio, video, and blogs chronicaling the transition to a voluntary society. What in the hell is a voluntary society? And I cringed at that pic of #YOLO SWAG 420 BLAZE IT
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/16 11:51 AM
2

The people who say these things wont see reason, but everyone listening will. If you stoop down to their level, you wont get many people on your side and people will view you as childish. I really like the way Mitch handled the situation here.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/16 09:17 PM
7

I would say that according to some definitions of the word, it basically qualifies as rape /s
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/16 09:54 AM
2

I dont think that you should stoop down to their level...
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/16 09:06 AM
1

That was the funniest thing I have ever seen :D Why go to a comedy show, or even out at all for that matter, if you get offended about everything?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/16 06:04 PM
2

Pepper spray can kill as well if the person has allergies. As for which is more lethal, it is difficult to say.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/12/15 06:08 PM
2

It was military grade I guess, I didnt think that they had different strength ones. In Finland, pepper spray is illegalfor civillians
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/15 09:20 PM
0

You shouldnt be trigger happy. If you can diffuse the situation by pushing the other person away, punching them back, that should always be the first course of action, not a pepper spray, assuming that the other person is smaller than you. It is like if I could taser someone for 5 seconds to incapacitate that person, but I choose to taser them for 25 seconds because I want revenge. It is like a 200lb police officer could take an unarmed 100lb 15 year old down, but instead he chooses to pepper sp…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/15 07:48 PM
-3

It isnt waterboarding, but it is in an entirely different league than a slap/punch. Maybe you should try it out first before using it on others...
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/15 06:59 PM
-3

If someone punches you, it doesnt mean they deserve to be waterboarded or shot in the leg to stop it from happening in the future. Pepper spray and tasers are not a fucking toy. Pepper spray was the worst 30 minutes of my life and I had water with me. The only reason you should use it is if you are in danger, not to get revenge on someone for some wrongdoing that was hurtful. It is excessive force.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/15 06:33 PM
-5

Well, I disagree. Unless someone is coming at you with a knife, the person attacking you is a lot bigger than you, or you are in danger, please do not use pepper spray. It is not a toy. It is basically torture for 30-45 minutes. Fucking horrible stuff.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/15 03:52 PM
109

If you dont mind getting killed by white knights...
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/15 12:10 AM
112

Always remember, if a girl is being a bitch at a public place and lays a finger on you, you always have the option to throw your drink on her.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/15 10:52 PM
5

Jesus...
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/15 10:01 AM
22

Lee argued that she had the right to change the agreement That would kind of defeat the purpose of the agreement in the first place. I dont understand people sometimes...
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/15 09:44 AM
6

This one never gets old :D
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 09:19 PM
162

That one idiot woman talking about women's feelings that they interviewed on the street is super ignorant. I believe the last time that her argument was being used was in the 1960's when segregation was still a thing. "I dont feel comfortable around black people, therefore black people shouldnt be allowed to go to this gym." (Btw, I am not saying that men are being discriminated against to the same extent that black people were, I am just pointing out the retardedness of her argument).
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/15 06:04 PM
4

I have to admit, at the start when Shami started her speech, I was about to click away when she started her whole "It sounds so good to be able to say madame president" bit. But I'm glad that I listened further and realized that the rest of what she had to say was actually quite reasonable. And then after thinking about it a bit, I realized that maybe the reason that she started the way she did wasnt because she prefers to see women on the top and men on the bottom, but because the fact that a w…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 05:09 PM
34

Shami's portion of the debate was also pretty good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya2nUm6UqLM I cant remember the last time I heard a feminist debating something reasonable.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 07:25 AM
55

If the guy is in that condition, all you can really do is try to keep them calm by completely lieing about the most optimistic situation. Freaking out wont help at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/15 10:25 PM
1

I would personally consider it more of like an spacial fume ionizer but I do see your point about the atomization process as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/15 10:05 PM
2

It reminds me of those women complaining that they are poor managers because society views women as bossy. I know so many fucking talented female managers who instead of bossing people around, inspire their workers and are seriously good mentors/managers. It is the same thing with guys, the best manager isnt the bossy one it is the one who motivates the workers effectively and efficiently. Incompetent female managers get to blame the patriarchy for viewing women as bossy without trying to better…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/15 02:48 PM
4

Nobody is denying that rape is a terrible crime and that rapists shouldnt be punished. That said, in the cases where it is 100% proven that a rape did happen, the rapist goes to prison (which everybody agrees with is correct). However, what MRA's are pissed off about is how when it is 100% proven that a women falsely accused a man of rape, most of the time the damage has already been done and still haunts the man for the rest of his life AND the woman gets a slap on the wrist as punishment. I ha…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 09:57 PM
3

I wasnt saying that rapes dont happen or that rapists shouldnt be punished. Where did you see that? I am pissed off that they think that it is ok to take someone else's civil rights away because they are just "privileged white men". I am pissed off because they think that it is ok to ignore due process to solve their problems and get their justice when in reality it is just creating another monstrous problem in society. People are innocent until proven guilty. And do you think that rape victims …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 09:44 PM
7

She thinks that it is ok for everybody else to have rights except for priveleged white men. It kind of reminds me of how the nazi's hated the jews because a lot of them were in debt to jews. Jews where the privileged rich people. I have a feeling that first on their agenda is taking away all white men's civil rights, then comes the pitchforks.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 12:27 PM
10

Hahaa, true :D
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 10:11 AM
2

There is no such thing as pressured someone into an affair. It is either rape or not. If it wasnt rape, then it was your own goddamn decision and you should take full responsibility for your actions. But this bitch cant do that because she is in her victim complex, so she twists the words into saying she was "pressured" into an affair.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 02:20 AM
8

If a woman ends up being a bad manager, it is because of sexism. If a man is not effective at being a manager, it is because he is incompetent. It is ridiculous how a lot of women blame all of their failures on sexism. Everything is someone else's fault and they did everything correctly. It is an insult to the manager women that I know that are actually damn good leaders. Your job as a manager is to find out a way to manage that doesnt come across as being bitchy. If you cant do it, it is your f…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 02:14 AM
17

Exactly
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 01:39 AM
47

Wow, that group of people wearing those shirts really pissed me off. Instead of any logical arguments, they just spouted out words like misogynism and rape apology. Her argument was that she was fearful of telling about her rape because she thought she wouldnt be believed. Well then stop fucking complaining. If you dont have the balls to tell anyone, it doesnt matter what the system is, you still wont tell anyone because there is still the same likelihood of you not being believed you fucking id…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/15 01:21 AM
3

does anybody know what happened to the case?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/15 10:58 PM
7

You are basically saying that because of the off chance that this might deter some woman from filing a police report for an actual rape, people should not be punished for knowingly trying to imprison another person for a crime that they didnt commit. First off, if a woman was actually raped, she wouldnt have to fear this because nobody will be able to prove that she wasnt raped (It would be impossible because of the fact that she actually was raped). Secondly, if a person is scared to file a pol…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/15 04:08 PM
7

It isnt a reasonable comment at all. She says that because of the off chance that this might deter some woman from filing a police report for an actual rape, people should not be punished for knowingly trying to imprison another person for a crime that they didnt commit. It is utter ridiculousness. First off, if a woman was actually raped, she wouldnt have to fear this because nobody will be able to prove that she wasnt raped (It would be impossible because of the fact that she actually was rape…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/15 04:07 PM
11

Relax bro, it was just a prank!
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/15 09:44 PM
1

No, it wasnt. What is wrong with you? She was mentally disturbed and this is an incredibly sad ending to a sad video.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/15 01:29 AM
3

No means yes, yes means anal.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 05:46 AM
1

Maybe
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:58 AM
1

You saying that it is a problem with some women makes the argument seem as though it is only a female problem. It is not only a problem with females but of everybody. You could have just as easily changed it to people or feminists and your statement's point would have been exactly the same without it being sexist. Then, when I ask you to change it because Im tired of stereotypes, you say that you wont because in your experience mostly women are guilty of it. Then I correct you and state cases wh…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:40 AM
1

I think that you are wrong. It was probably a small group of trolls or something. I doubt that many womens groups are actually supporting those statements. Its a group of misandrists.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:18 AM
4

Just because you grew up baptist doesnt mean that my aforementioned sentence was wrong in any way. And I was just making an assumption because you seem to be an MRA and claim not to have seen men doing the same thing. It could of course very well be wrong. I dont understand why you got so offended.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:45 PM
6

Men change their arguments constantly as well. It is a problem with people arguing against logic and not only women. You have only seen it from women probably because you mostly debate female feminists. Male feminists are also guilty of it, male bible preachers are guilty of it, etc. I think it has more to do with what you preach rather than whether you are a man or woman.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:29 PM
8

I agree with your statement, but I think you should change women to people. Men are guilty of that too sometimes.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 10:50 PM
13

So the man is an abuser until proven otherwise? And because he hasn't been proven to not be an abuser, it is ok for the woman to continue cheating on him and lieing to him behind his back. Just wow.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 10:19 PM
0

It almost completely dissappears when you take into account only college educated individuals from those races
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:14 PM
2

True, you have a point.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:01 AM
-1

But if both men and women want it and both benefit from it, WHY? Its like if a billionaire wants to give away a ton of money so he gives every woman $1.00 for free and he gives every man $0.50 for free. Everybody wins. The billionaire wanted to give away money, the women get a free $1 and men get a free $0.50. Then, somebody is so spoiled that he complains about it.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:51 PM
1

But you havent really presented any counterargument other than capitalism is shit. If capitalism causes a win win win situation for all parties then yes, it is ok. If it for instance made men pay more so that women wouldnt have to pay, it would be a win-win-lose situation and then it would be clearly not ok. In the case of womens night, a nash equilibrium is established. The economy is about bringing the greatest happiness to the greatest amount of people.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:27 PM
1

And ask your girlfriend what she thinks about the above comment because I really am curious as to why there is controversy over objectification.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:33 PM
3

You are a genius. That was really good thinking from the business's standpoint. You're boss must have been happy.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:49 PM
1

Yea, I agree, it might be a reason for making it illegal. But I bet that the clubs (whom are the only losers of this scenario) would have already lobbied for it to be illegal if it was truly hurting their profits. I am still on the fence about this one.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:40 PM
5

So you think that because parents cannot teach their children healthy living habits, companies shouldn't be able to advertise their products with visually and sexually appealing people? I agree that eating disorders are no joke but dont you think that public education would be the solution rather than telling people to stop enjoying beautiful people's bodies? When I see David Beckham, I think damn, I should go work out more and get healthier. Do you know why I think this way? Because my parents …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:21 PM
2

I dont understand the whole controversy of objectifying a woman. Why cant the clubs use their massive female parties as a promotional tool? If a woman wants to attend the party, so be it. Why does that concern anybody else in any way? Models constantly use their good looks to gain income. Does this mean that models are objectified for their good looks only? Yes! But I doubt that the models mind and neither do the businesses. And an advertisement of David Beckham without a shirt doesnt influence …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:40 PM
1

My reasoning doesnt fail. On the demand side, the law of demand states that if the price falls, demand rises. I can relate to this because, I have stayed home on several occasions because I couldnt afford to go out. If the prices had been cheaper, I would have gone out more often. So, therefore, it attracts women who otherwise wouldn't have been able to afford to go to the club (by no means am I implying that only men can afford to go to clubs). Also, if a woman has the choice between going to t…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:31 PM
2

hahaa, the best part is at 2.35 when someone says, "that was totally uncalled for" and the guy responds, "shut the fuck up, get the fuck out of here" :D
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/14 02:22 PM
9

I'm quite on the fence about this one. On one hand, I can see how this is discriminatory and not ok. On the other hand, ladies night helps draw a ton of women out to night clubs especially in Asia where ladies drink for free. Guys want to go to the clubs with lots of women in them so they go to the clubs that have ladies night. Guys drink a lot more than women and therefore are a bigger source of profit for the clubs. Without ladies night, not as many girls would go out and guys wouldn't have as…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 11:52 AM
2

Despite Finland's strong feminist movement, we still have mandatory unpaid 6, 9, or 12 months military for men or unpaid 12 months of civil service. Many women are against removing this or applying it to them so we still have it.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:40 AM
10

Just the hours worked alone would compensate for the pay gap. 56/44=1.272727 1/1.272727=78% (Edit: faster and simpler way to calculate: 44/56= 78%) Women work 78% as much as men. Therefore, a total pay gap of 22% is to be expected in a fair society where people get compensated equally for the number of hours worked.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:55 AM
1

Woops, I didnt really read the article and I just realized that you are correct. My bad. I was thinking that this guy had a 61% control of the company through shares and after the divorce the wife (who wasnt CEO for over 3 decades) would now have or the money accumulated from the selling of the shares. Now, the CEO would have 30.5% and either a wife who wasnt as competent making as important decisions as him thus depleting the value of the shares, OR, the CEO would have a non-controlling amount,…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:47 PM
2

He doesnt have 7 billion dollars, he has 7 billion dollars worth of stock in the company. That means that the company, if it is run well, is expected to generate cash flows in the future worth a current value of 7 billion for his percentage of the company. If he had to sell his shares, he would lose an incredible amount of control in his company that he started and grew. The share prices would fall a ton from a massive sale OR in the case that the wife kept the shares, the share prices would fal…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:37 PM
2

Hell even Finland, one of the worlds most "egalitarian" countries according to feminists, systematically oppresses men by a forced, payless year of civil service, or 6, 9, or 12 months of payless labor in the army, or a year in prison. What I mean by payless is the 5 euros a day that we get for 24 hour service.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 02:31 PM
1

Woops, I misunderstood completely.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:06 PM
1

To be honest, that does look a little bit staged.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:39 AM
2

And everybody takes a shit next to the toilet.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:47 AM
1

I think that people are often absolute retards. A transgendered individual is like 1 in 10, 000 people. So because this one person out of ten thousand cant feel comfortable in his/her designated bathroom, all of the rules have to be changed and molded to their preference. After this, nobody is comfortable using the restrooms. Hell, with nongendered bathrooms, that transgendered person still has to use the restroom with both genders now, including the gender he/she was whining about.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:32 AM
8

If colbert gets the reputation that he makes his interviewees look bad, not many celebrities would want to go on the show. If no celebrities go on the show, the show would be cancelled.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:02 AM
-1

But there is gender bias in society because men and women are not exactly the same. Shouldnt the goal, be that this was ridiculous behavior from that guys side, dont behave like that guy instead of "women wont ever have this happen to them" and then crying about it. Im glad that it wont happen to women.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:44 AM
4

This! Why on earth are people upvoting that guy. I thought people here were smarter. This is the same reason why I dont like feminism. People manage to find every possible way to victimize themselves.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:53 AM
1

And to be honest, it isnt common sense that the shirt needs to be taken completely off. It was just a misunderstanding due to someones ignorance. A misunderstanding doesnt justify not giving first aid in a situation that requires it. I doubt the guy would have called the cops if he had known or someone would have explained it to him. But I still call him a retard for presuming that in the event of serious injury, he believes that someone will just use it as an opportunity to see boobs. What an i…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:46 AM
1

How can you make the claim that these stories pop up a lot? This is the first time I have ever heard of it. The police dropped the matter when the guy explained himself. The police had to question him because someone called the cops. This guy was nowhere near going to jail.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:26 PM
1

Why get angry over whether it would have happened to a woman as well? Why does it matter at all?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:23 PM
11

That is not what happened, though. The police dropped it when they heard his statement. Do you have any reason to believe that they wont drop it next time as well? Because I didnt read anything about that.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:19 PM
-20

Oh come on. One retard getting offended is not enough to justify not helping in a critical situation. Retards get offended from everything, that is already a universal constant. For example, there are very few youtube videos without dislikes, does that mean we should stop making youtube videos?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:42 PM
2

Just write something that is non-insulting that disagrees with her. In facebook, you cannot dislike so I'm sure you'll get a few likes. If she starts insulting you, call her out on being disrespectful and as long as you were not insulting, she will be the one who looks like an ass.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 07:35 PM
2

Not only equal that but double it. 1x for all the time the guy spent and 2x for punishment.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:51 PM
2

But the biggest discrimination in Finland is the one year of slave labor (in some cases 6 or 9 months) in the form of military service or civil service that rids a man of one year of his working life. We men lose our highest paying year's salary due to this and one year of interest; effectively ridding us of 3-5% of our earning potential. And finland is supposedly one of the most equal countries in the world (I guess if the definition of equality is that women should have 3-5% more money from ca…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:18 AM
1

Education from LGBT perspective? I understand if they want some sort of tolerance class once or something, or if sexual education also taught about tolerance in this aspect but it is a little bit crazy to educate kids and in every subject have the homosexual perspective brought up. SRS for underaged individuals? Underaged individuals are not mature enough to be able to consent to a life changing surgery that will have lifelong consequences. When I was a 16, I thought that I was so cool because I…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:57 PM
1

Like what for instance?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:20 PM
1

One of the environmental parties made an angry rant against men for eating meat, flying far for business trips, and other ways in which we use more CO2 and that men have no inclination to change their ways as opposed to women. Thus, men ruin the world for women. Feminist Initiative isnt the only party where man hatred is percieved as ok. But I guess this reeducation might have something to do with the same topic as well.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 05:36 AM
6

They believe that the information obligation for HIV positive individuals should be abolished (HIV patients shouldnt have to tell their sexual partners of their diagnosis) because it is discriminatory against HIV positive individuals and everyone should have the right to reproduce. Source: http://feministisktinitiativ.se/politik/sexualpolitik/sakrare-sex/
/r/MensRights15/09/14 07:00 PM
8

Here are some more examples on the level of crazy of the party. They support the following: -HIV positive individuals shouldn't have to disclose their condition to sexual partners. Their justification is that the information disclosure requirement is discriminatory against HIV-positive individuals because everyone should have the right to reproduce. -Underaged individuals should have the right to choose for themselves if they want to undergo gender-changing surgery -The law on freedom of choice …
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:53 PM
1

Damn
/r/MensRights11/09/14 09:04 AM
1

Wow, I cant believe people are still supporting this kind of bullshit. Its like nobody learned anything from Hitler. Same shit in a different package with a nice feminist bowtie and love as the propaganda message.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 07:54 AM
1

Did this monster raving looney party have such a huge backing?
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:37 AM
1

Thanks for the translation! For larger regional development projects half of the money will be assigned to women. (Wasn't aware this was supposed to be an issue) Doesn't it say that at least half of the money? They are completely fine if men dont get half but women must get at least half. Also, HBTQ is LGBT in English Why do you agree that prison sentencing should be abolished?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:13 PM
2

That would be so great! Thanks!
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:09 PM
5

If you want a reason to become even more anti-feminist, read about the Feminist Initiative party in Sweden. It is so scary what kind of things they are trying to promote in the name of equality. They literally want women to get lower interest rates than men when applying for funding for startup companies. They want three bathrooms to be required for all establishments (men, women, and transgender). They want it to be legal for underage people to be able to choose themselves if they want gender c…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:28 PM
1

http://feministisktinitiativ.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/For_en_feministisk_politik_2013.pdf Everything from the site is found on here.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:35 PM
3

It is because this is an article written by a critic of the party, Fredrik Nielsen. The sad part is that he didn't distort any of the information and cited every single one of the claims from the Feminist Initiative party's website and they can all be found from a simple search of the party's website. My guess is that most people voting for it, probably only vote for it because the party name is feminist initiative. They probably didn't even read the party's agenda but just assumed that because …
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:20 PM
2

https://tanketornet.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/hej-alla-som-rostade-pa-fi-men-glomde-lasa-partiprogrammet/ This article will truly frighten you as it does me. And it is so scary that such bigots have such a huge backing in Sweden.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:26 PM
3

https://tanketornet.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/hej-alla-som-rostade-pa-fi-men-glomde-lasa-partiprogrammet/ It will scare you to read some of these points. They are so discriminatory against men and claim to be anti-discrimination. And it is so amazing that they have such a huge backing in Sweden.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:24 PM
8

I am an MR activist and I completely disagree with you. I have not seen many feminists ever that want men to buy them shit. Dont spread this kind of bullshit because it reflects upon the MRM movement in a bad way because of your individual ignorance.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:03 AM
11

Read about the Feminist Initiative party in Sweden. It is so scary what kind of things they are trying to promote in the name of equality. They literally want women to get lower interest rates than men when applying for funding for startup companies. They want three bathrooms to be required for all establishments (men, women, and transgender). They want it to be legal for underage people to be able to choose themselves if they want gender changing surgery. They want HIV positive people to have t…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:58 AM
1

And the sad thing is that had the time stamps not been found or if she had done this while he would have been living in the house, she likely would have gotten away with it too. I wonder what amount of people this has happened to.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:44 AM
1

I have to say one more thing. I think that if people use him as an example of how the courts are unfair towards men and use it to better the system, it doesnt mean that Robin Williams will only be remembered as the guy who commited suicide. I think that people would still remember him as the funny guy who brought joy to the lives of others, and not just disregard his memory and only remember how he ended his life the way he did.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 08:21 PM
2

I think that we will just have to agree to disagree. How many Robin Williamses need to die before we can talk about an issue without it being regarded as using a posterchild. I cannot speak for Mr. Williams but if there was a clear legal inequality in society causing me so much pain that I end up killing myself for it, I dont think I would be too unhappy if people used my name to fight for fixing the system that caused me to be in this depression in the first place. I cant imagine what he would …
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:50 AM
1

Did you know that society has a thing where every guy should "man up" whenever they have problems. No guy should complain because their supposed to just deal with the problem instead of being a whiney little bitch. Robin Williams is a great example of victim of this. And I refuse to not talk about someone's problems not just for Robin Williams but for every guy in his position that cant/wont get help from anywhere. If it happened to Williams, it sure as hell happens to many other divorced men an…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:04 AM
2

Elliot Rodgers killed several people and feminists used this to their advantage and wrongly demonized MRAs. They didn't "respect the recently passed". (not saying that we should start acting like feminists) But anyways, divorces and a fucked up legal system rewarding divorced women caused the depression and subsequent suicide of a well-known, liked celebrity. Shouldn't we highlight how fucked up the system causing his depression is?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:17 PM
3

You think the divorce just came up all of a sudden. The first divorce was 26 years ago.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:14 AM
8

Robin Williams was known to being in a financial wreck. He accepted a role in "The Crazy Ones" that he did not want to act in just in order to have stable source of income to pay his financial obligations. When "The Crazy Ones" was cancelled after only one season, Robin went into severe depression because he lost his source of income. Shortly after, he was back to drinking and committed suicide. Let's look at the reason he was in a financial wreck. He owed 30 million dollars to his ex-wives. The…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:34 AM
1

blaming his suicide on just divorce is disingenuous to Robin's memory. Why?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:23 AM
1

If I was to die, I would be happy that people use my name to bring forth good change in the world. I dont understand this argument that someone just died, lets ignore why he died for a couple of months.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:18 AM
2

And that is only talking about suicide statistics. Increased depression is also an important part (which the increased suicide signifies).
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:08 AM
3

Remember what feminists did with Elliot Rodgers #YesAllWomen
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:00 AM
1

But in these fights, most of the time women and children are innocent and not fighting or politically being responsible for the wars (I understand that it doesnt say much about the innocent male civillians who also die). Maybe using the phrasing "# of civillians have been killed" would be better and more egalitarian but then again, most of America really doesnt see the fight for equality so important that they would start adapting their phrases.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:10 AM
2

Fire someone who already quit? Sounds very much cleverly smart.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:10 AM
1

She should have made better decisions on drinking alcohol? More like the adults in the room should have acted like adults and not given her the alcohol and then take advantage of the drunk minor afterwards. I am commenting on the situation presented. Not the true situation which might very well be different.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:02 AM
1

I am not arguing that the 16 year olds werent child molesters but the 21 year old IN THE STORY was (if the story is true). And did you even watch the video? The video clearly states that some of the men are not covered by Romeo and Juliet laws. And she didn't go there to have group sex, she went there to have sex with one or two guys and said that she doesn't want to have sex with anymore at which point the adults provided her with more drinks. The only reason I am stripping her of her agency is…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 10:07 PM
0

Ok, but imagine that you allow one man to have sex with your anus while sober but then 5 people do it. You had already previously while more sober told them that you don't want to have sex with 5 guys. Then, you got too drunk because they pressured an underaged you into drinking more drinks knowing that they will manipulate you when you are more drunk. Having sex with someone who is too drunk to consent is rape. This girl didnt go around and actively search for dick to fuck, the guys saw a drunk…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:10 PM
4

I do understand your point but she did drive there, under influence, with wanting to go wild on the party. She drove there under the influence and, therefore, she deserves whatever punishment the state holds appropriate for that crime. She did not deserve to be taken advantage of, though. And juat because she wanted to go wild and have sex with one guy at a party doesnt mean that she deserved to have 5 guys taking advantage of her drunken state. She went there, chugged half a bottle herself and …
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:01 PM
3

According to the story, the girl at first didnt want to have sex with more than one guy so the guys gave her more alcohol and then she consented. If the story is true, clearly the guys took advantage of a drunk, underage girl and at least the 21 year old that was involved and the adults that made the child pornography and distributed it were at fault.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:49 PM
12

I'm normally for most of the things in Men's Rights but this time I have to say, that girl was raped. She didnt want to sleep with 5 guys so the guys gave her more drinks until she wanted to. She was also underage and one of the boys was 5 years older than her. Clearly the guys took advantage of a drunk, underage girl and they should be punished. To top it all off they made and distributed child pornography. At least several of those guys are criminals if the story is true
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:44 PM
5

This is why we need feminism. To dismantle all statistics by an emotional rampage except the ones in their favor. Happened with equal pay statistics as well. #YesAllWomen
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:37 AM
-1

A hot girl with a skin tight short skirt that cant be any shorter is angry because guys look at her while she walks down the street in a poor neighborhood.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:40 AM
-1

The woman said that she likes to dress provocatively. What else is provocative? An airhorn. It is, thus, a great analogy.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:22 AM
3

Hahaa, great analogy. I should have the right to sound my airhorn without being harassed :D
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:30 AM
1

It's not a hypothesis, its theory. All liberal arts function on theory, which people come up with, study, think about, write papers on, do studies on, ask people for personal opinions, do ethnographies etc etc and come up with new theory based on that. Its still rigorous, but studying people is not scientific. Not everything that is useful is science. It is more like a highly funded conspiracy theory. There is so much money being spent to research female problems as opposed to gender problems on…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:30 PM
1

Kill bill does not feature mainstream characters, and neither does gta 5. Nobody is watching kill bill thinking "yeah i get into epic sword fights with dudes" or playing gta 5 thinking "man all these dudes i'm shooting plays out so much like my everyday morning". However, people do watch porn thinking they could find themselves in that situation. You are making quite a strong claim here without any backup evidence. How did you come to this conclusion? The truth is that you dont have any supporti…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:19 PM
1

The whole concept of patriarchy is a bullshit hypothesis that feminists claim as fact. I have actually read the feminist definition on the wikipedia page. You cannot accept a hypothesis as fact. That is like accepting that God is real because it would support your arguments.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 08:44 AM
1

I however, choose to believe that those powers that have excluded women in the past, although legally a non-issue today, continue to exclude women now, and sexist attitudes remain engrained in the general population. There is a very important distinction between what you choose to believe and what is fact. If you choose to believe that the melting of glaciers in Antarctica is an act of god instead of global warming, you are 100% allowed to continue to be retarded. Patriarchy is the most ridiculo…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 08:37 AM
2

If X is less than Y, you cannot conclude that Y is positive, is basically what he is saying.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:29 AM
2

Oh ok, I guess I was wrong.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:24 AM
3

If a man hits a woman BACK, the man is the victim not the aggressor #stopvictimblaming
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:42 PM
1

Look at how women's problems are at the forefront of all of societies issues. Use Finland as a great example. Feminists argue for equal pay => everybodies' salary info gets released on a public document each year. Feminists argue for equal opportunity in jobs => feminists get laws protecting women from any potential discrimination. Maternity leave is making women less favorable in job markets => Give men paternity leave. Men have an obligatory 6, 9, or 12 month military or 12 month civilian serv…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:03 PM
2

If you agreed that his logic is correct, you wouldnt give a shit about what constitutes as the X in the equation of logic and what constitutes as Y. Yet, you care about what he used in his example for X and Y (by asking what he classifies as mild and what is violent), therefore it leads me to believe that you do not understand what he was teaching, similarily as the emotionally-thinking feminists going anal about the same thing.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:45 PM
2

You did miss the point and you do not understand. If you understood the logic of the argument, you wouldnt care what he substitutes as X or Y for the example.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:35 PM
1

I think that it is actually a pretty good idea. It sounds like before this, there was a situation where no word was describing someone who's gender was unknown or trans. I dont see why it would take seven years of lobbying to come up with a solution to the problem.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:31 PM
2

You are missing the WHOLE point. He said that if someone believes that X is worse than Y, it doesnt endorse Y. It doesnt matter what constitutes as mild and what doesnt. If he said that stealing is worse than lieing, it doesnt mean that he is endorsing lieing. If he said that lieing is worse than stealing, it doesnt endorse stealing. It doesnt matter what counts as mild and what doesnt because of the logic in the argument.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:20 PM
4

Then the universities should be 100% liable for any damages to the reputations and education of the falsely punished men. This is intolerable and I hope the men get nice reparations for the damages.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:56 PM
1

While this video is pretty funny, it isn't a men's rights issue at all. It is an issue about people getting married without prenups. All rich and successful people lose money through divorce, man or woman. We just hear about it more often because men usually make up the richest people in the world. When Kevin Federline and Britney Spears divorced, Kevin Federline took half of Britney's shit.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:54 PM
11

Why is it that these cases have so much evidence against them and none supporting them, other than an insane girl crying about her problems, and they still get found guilty? I thought that in the U.S., the policy is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. How can anyone with a sane mind let alone an institution of education get away with this absurdity?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:02 PM
2

You should post this story to TwoXChromosomes, just to experiment what would happen.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:25 PM
7

For me, the worst part of getting hit by a woman isnt the physically getting punched part, it is the utter embarrassment and helpless feeling that you get afterwards. My worst experience at a bar was after I was hitting on a girl (I'll call her Susan) and Susan's friend came over super angry at Susan over $20. She tells me to fuck off before I even say a word to her. I told her to relax a little because she was making a huge scene. She then punched me in the face. It didnt really hurt much physi…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:45 AM
1

I seriously cannot stand this article. It uses the argument that all of male's problems are a result of the patriarchy. It basically blames men for having problems. And it states that feminism isn't against 50/50 custodial right but in that case, how in the hell did NOW successfully lobby against it? This article is absolute garbage. It makes false statements like everything is a part of the patriarchy and rape culture. I have never in my life seen this rape culture which feminists constantly sa…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:07 AM
1

Yea, its kind of like a hidden tax that most people in Finland dont realize unfortunately.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:47 AM
1

Yes, you are right but that doesnt change anything. Net income is salary minus taxes. I lose one year of salary and one of taxes, therefore I lose my highest earning year's net income. This results in the wealth loss of 3-4% as in my analysis. Therefore, I pay 3-4% more taxes than women because the whole loss of income went to service of the state.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:00 PM
4

Actually, never mind, I repeal my last comment stating that this is a rational argument. It really is not. All adults should be responsible for their own actions. If a cunning salesman sells an adult a car that is too expensive for the person, the person buying the car is the only one that is responsible for that decision. If adult women are so easily manipulated that they cannot be held responsible for giving consent, that is a similar argument as saying that women shouldnt be given the right t…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:22 AM
1

Your answer is the first reasonable response I have come across. I understand your argument very well and it is a very good one. But there is one major difficulty with making the definition of rape broader. Where does it cross the line? If a movie star wants to have casual sex with a girl who wants a relationship, after intercourse did the movie star emotionally manipulate and rape this girl that wanted to have a relationship? If there is a natural ladiesman and he convinces a girl to have sex w…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:36 AM
7

That is exactly the point. It might be morally wrong but it doesnt make the guy a rapist. I dont have much pity for guys who beg for sex but I will not classify them as a rapist. If they were a rapist they wouldnt ask in the first place. If a person gives in due to this emotional manipulation, they are still responsible for their own actions. You cannot just withdraw consent after the fact because you feel guilty of your actions. There are, however, many feminists that want to make it so that yo…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:19 AM
2

What do you think about male unemployment rates, young women earning more than men, women earning a majority of all college degrees, women only scholarships, women initiating most of domestic violence cases, women get 63% shorter sentences for the same crimes as men, men are 74% of all homeless, men make up 93% of all workplace deaths, less funding for male health issues, women have longer life expectancies than men by years, countless feminist politicians while males rights are demonized by a l…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:58 AM
11

If the active portion of the movement is only comprised of people such as in NOW, than in my opinion, those are the representatives the movement. If NOW was just a small proportion of crazy feminists, how in the hell did they have the power to successfully lobby against 50/50 custody for men and women? Think about it for two seconds, if you are a silent feminist in your own mind and not a crazy one, tell me, how have you influenced the actions of the feminist movement?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:46 AM
12

When you are an active MRA, 99.9% of the feminists reply in a similar manner. They almost always use the same fallacy of logic arguments/ insults to get their point across. MRA's often make fun of these arguments that feminists use because they are sometimes absolutely retarded and almost everybody has experienced the same retarded argumentation during debate. For example, this post makes fun of the no means no principle. While no does mean no, feminists often argue that once a woman has said no…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:41 AM
2

I dont think that the answer is making the military or civil service compulsory for everybody. The biggest problem with our current army are the nonmotivated soldiers not that it doesnt have enough of a quantity of soldiers. Because of the Army, I end up paying more than 3% more taxes throughout my lifetime in finland than women. I finish university at the age of 25 whereas if I was a woman, I would finish at 24. If I want to retire at 64, I would get only 39 years of work to generate income as …
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:35 PM
5

Because of the Army, I end up paying more than 3% more taxes throughout my lifetime in finland than women. I finish university at the age of 25 whereas if I was a woman, I would finish at 24. If I want to retire at 64, I would get only 39 years of work to generate income as opposed to women who can work 40 years. 1/40=2.5% and because I lose my 40th year, I lose my highest paying year AND one year of interest which ends up bringing the total to 3-4% of total income loss during my lifetime becaus…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:26 PM
8

Because of the Army, I end up paying more than 3% more taxes throughout my lifetime in finland than women. I finish university at the age of 25 whereas if I was a woman, I would finish at 24. If I want to retire at 64, I would get only 39 years of work to generate income as opposed to women who can work 40 years. 1/40=2.5% and because I lose my 40th year, I lose my highest paying year AND one year of interest which ends up bringing the total to 3-4% of total income loss during my lifetime becaus…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:22 PM
8

Hahaa, the tumblr about men taking up too much space on subways because they feel empowered is such hilarious garbage :D
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:22 AM
9

I think that you are the one that doesnt know what feminism or Men's Rights is.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:23 AM
9

Tell me, what is feminism? Is it the so called arbitrary 'definition' about equality of all genders that you people always insist on but never support or the actions of the movement?
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:12 AM
15

We have 15 in Finland. If you do any crime before the age of 15, you cannot be held criminally responsible. If you cause damages in the crime, your parents will have to pay for those but there is no criminal repercussions for the acts.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:11 AM
3

I think that she is a bitch and is just trying to fuck with OP. Why would she tell OP that she might be pregnant and not tell him later if it was actually the case? She already said that she will abort if she is pregnant. And also, why would she go to a blood test when she could just get a simple urine test before? I think that she already knows that she isnt pregnant and is trying to fuck with OP's mind or then just being an attention whore.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:57 PM
2

Google isnt trying to help humanity with this stunt. They have a lot of analysts crunching numbers to determine which plan of action will be the most profitable. Corporations care only about and this investment was made to keep some stakeholder's happy and it will end up giving Google returns on its investment. Google isnt an activist. Smart companies remain quite neutral with all issues and try to keep as many stakeholders happy as possible. If their action made a few MRAs upset, they get retur…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:26 PM
2

I just realized, I think we are arguing the same thing using different words :D
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:41 PM
1

It isnt an either invest in women's coding or calico debate. Google has enough to invest in both. On top of that, adding 50 million dollars excess to calico's investment might not even add enough value to calico where it would be profitable. Trust me, google isnt trying to help humanity with this stunt. They have a lot of analysts crunching numbers to determine which plan of action will be the most profitable. Corporations care only about money and this investment was made to keep some stakehold…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:28 PM
2

That, in itself, is corporate social responsibility. They are basically advertising that they are a company that supports women because women's issues are the hot topic currently. It is not a bad business plan. And also, google benefits from teaching coding to women. It will make computer science a more competitive program and, thus, in 10 years Google will have smarter computer science majors to recruit. 50 million dollars for Google is not a lot of money at all.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:19 PM
2

This stunt isnt about equality at all. It is a way for google to make more money by the commercials that they put onto the products and it is also cheap advertising (because feminist organizations will spread the word for free in their joy) and a display of corporate social responsibility as many people think that it is a huge problem that such few women are interested in computer sciences. It is, actually, not a bad business idea. If I was the head of google, I would also do something similar e…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:46 PM
7

There is no such thing as a systematic misogeny. No such thing as society holding back women because it is being controlled by men.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:07 PM
8

I sometimes do. It feels like my attempts at arguing are completely useless. I spend hours and hours typing simple, flawless responses so that even the simplest of minds could follow the logic. Then, I place the comment onto a discussion with a feminist and the feminist completely disregards what I have said by name-calling and using fallacy of logic arguments to continue being retards. I see powerful people like Cherie Blair (Tony Blair's idiot wife), Christine Lagarde (director at the IMF), Sh…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:28 PM
3

And beer. Dont forget, lots and lots of tasty beer.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:17 PM
8

There is no such thing as the patriarchy of how feminists describe it.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:12 PM
4

Not only this, but a woman who has been proven to have committed a false rape accusation and, thus, knowingly wasted police resources and jepardized an innocent man to be punished and classified as a rapist, should recieve AT LEAST the same sentence that she knowingly jepardized the man with. They should get at least the same punishment as a rapist.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:56 PM
4

The whole concept of dismissing or discrediting feminists stems from the fact that feminists, very often jump to illogical conclusions and completely terrible solutions to their illogical problems. A recent example of this is when there was the "study" about hurricane namings being female causing more deaths because men dont take women seriously. The study had major flaws, for example, the most evident being that it examined two different time periods. Another person made a new study that made j…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:45 PM
3

Please, dont twist my words. I never claimed to be an awesome person. I said that I was a better, more social and funnier person than I was before. Without PUA, I would still be the confused virgin nice guy that I used to be, drying up women's vaginas within a one mile radius of me. I dont understand why it is such a terrible thing to learn how to turn girls on. If nothing else, at least my girlfriend appreciates it and thats good enough for me.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 02:48 PM
5

An uneducated man has the choice of working in walmart or mcdonalds. An uneducated woman has the choice to work at walmart, mcdonalds or Playboy. Playboy isnt a company that engages in human trafficing and sex slavery, the women go there on their own free will and would rather work there than mcdonalds. PUAs can not only get young, insecure girls, they can get stable girls of any age. I learned the techniques that turn women on without routines and have a smoking hot, smart girlfriend of one and…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:19 AM
2

What is TRP?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:48 AM
3

The thing is, even when you havent made a single mistake in your argumentation when arguing with a feminist, they say I dont believe that that one argument/source of one of the factors discussed is credible and then dismisses the entire argument. They just dont believe one source because they choose not to and then are able to discredit everything you say. I have stopped arguing with the idiots on TwoXChromosomes because of it. They arent willing to look at anything even slightly from an open pe…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:43 AM
1

NAICE!!
/r/MensRights20/06/14 07:18 PM
1

This stunt isnt about equality at all. It is a way for google to make more money by the commercials that they put onto the products and it is also free advertising from feminist organizations. It is, actually, not a bad business idea. If I was the head of google, I would also do something similar even though I am quite an active MRA.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 06:53 PM
1

When I read this article the first time, this is what infuriated me the most: "40-45% of the degrees in Math, Statistics, and the Physical Sciences were conferred to women in 2012. Even better, a majority of Biology degrees in 2012 (58%) were earned by women." So for some reason it is "better" when women have 58% of Biology degrees than when men have 40-45% of the degrees in Math, Statistics, and physical sciences. To me, both situations are quite equal and neither is "even better" than the othe…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:26 PM
2

You said that a lot of feminists are opposed to it. Don't you think that it is the other way around. Some feminists oppose it and a lot of feminists are for it. Otherwise, how could a bill like this get passed if a small minority was getting their voices heard and unchallenged.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:19 PM
6

Well, isn't that factor clearly what is happening with the quotas that some are trying to impose on businesses and politics. And these aren't just "some" random people, these are very prominent known people. People like Cherie Blair (Tony Blairs idiot wife). People like Christine Lagarde (director of the IMF). People like Sheryl Sandberg (COO at Facebook). Quotas make it so that if a man and a woman have equal or even unequal qualifications as in work performance, experience, fit, etc. one will …
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:06 PM
3

You have a very rapey attitude!
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:25 PM
4

But in that case, feminists would argue about the inequality of males being upgraded to first class flights at higher rates than females. They will demand quotas be set!
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:22 PM
2

If it is so important for the child to live a luxuriously as possible, then put him in the care of the father instead of giving the mother all of the fathers cash because she has maternal priviledge over custody issues.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:27 PM
5

Who cares how much he is worth, HE earned the money and it is his not the woman's whom he fucked. 1k a month on CHILD support is clearly enough to support a CHILD. I am a student living on 600 euros a month. Embarrasing or not child support is making sure that the kid is taken care of. Not to cover the kid's mom's luxuries.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:17 PM
2

male privilege is being called a sexist for wanting equal rights by radical feminists
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter