TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrBensBusiness Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by MrBensBusiness on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

The main flaw is treating cold approach like it's supposed to be your primary strategy. It isn't an all-or-nothing choice. It's one tool. The conversion rate is low, but so is online dating for most men. A low success rate doesn't automatically make something ineffective if the cost of trying is small and the skill improves over time. The "ruining your image" point is also overstated. Unless you're repeatedly approaching women in the same small social circle, most people will never know. In larg…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 05:34 PM
1

I'd be fine with less pressure to follow rigid gender roles, but not with erasing sex altogether. Men and women are biologically different, and I don't see a benefit in pretending those differences don't matter. Equal rights doesn't require making everyone the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:27 AM

The inconsistency comes from treating the exact same age gap differently depending on who is expressing the preference. If a 22-year-old woman says she prefers older men, people often emphasize her autonomy and say she's an adult who can make her own choices. If a man says he prefers younger adult women, the discussion often shifts away from her autonomy and toward questioning his motives. A consistent standard would either respect the choices of consenting adults regardless of who initiated the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 10:26 AM
1

A big reason is that people tend to assume men's jealousy is about controlling women, while women's jealousy is framed as protecting the relationship. The exact same emotion gets interpreted through two completely different lenses depending on who's expressing it. There are also different expectations placed on each sex. A woman getting upset over her boyfriend giving attention to another woman is often treated as a normal emotional reaction. A man setting boundaries around behavior that openly …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 06:29 PM

Closeness alone doesn't override sexual orientation. Strong platonic bonds can form under extreme circumstances without becoming sexual. Some individuals might adapt due to isolation, but it isn't inevitable, and you can't assume someone will abandon their orientation simply because they're stranded. Sexual orientation still matters, even when companionship becomes essential.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 09:16 PM

I think "social skills" gets used too broadly. Some of it is real, like holding a conversation and reading social cues, but a lot of it is also influenced by attraction and context. The same behavior can be seen as charming or awkward depending on who's doing it. Dating also expects men to carry much more of the social burden, so it's not surprising they're the ones most often criticized for lacking "social skills." The standard isn't always as objective or consistent as people make it sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 05:18 PM
2

I don't think this is even controversial. Women having challenges doesn't mean the challenges are equivalent. If one side is deciding between dozens of matches while the other is hoping to get one, those are fundamentally different positions. Filtering through options is a problem created by abundance. Struggling to get noticed is a problem created by scarcity. They aren't the same problem. People also underestimate how abundance changes behavior. When there is always another profile one swipe a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 06:27 AM
1

People say they only want the bare minimum, then describe a man who is attractive, financially stable, confident, emotionally intelligent, funny, ambitious, loyal, attentive, socially skilled, shares their values, and has no major flaws. That's not the bare minimum. That's an above-average man with a very specific set of traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 06:34 AM
1

That assumes women who are partnered today are actually in better relationships, which hasn't really been established. Being more selective only improves outcomes if people are selecting for traits that lead to better long-term relationships. You're also treating attraction as if it's the only thing that matters. A relationship can fail because of poor attraction, though it can also fail because people prioritize attraction over compatibility, character, stability, or shared goals. The other iss…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 05:46 PM
1

I think there's some truth to it. Once you tell men that women can stay in relationships for security, status, convenience, or other benefits rather than pure love, you can't be surprised when some men become more cautious and skeptical. The image of women as inherently more virtuous or less self-interested than men has largely disappeared, and many men now view women as equally capable of both good and bad behavior. That doesn't mean distrust is always justified, but it does mean the old assump…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 06:17 PM
1

That view is too extreme. Improving yourself makes sense, but sacrificing your mental health, stability, and self-respect for casual sex is not discipline; it is obsession. A man should build his looks, confidence, money, and social skills because it improves his life overall, not because he has to destroy himself chasing validation. Casual sex is not worth “sacrificing everything” for.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:27 PM
1

If the end goal is still validation, then the direction never really changed. It just looks more productive on the surface. A stronger position is building a life that holds up on its own. When your habits, money, health, and mindset are solid, you’re not dependent on anyone reacting to it. Women can be part of your life, but they’re not the scoreboard.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 02:02 PM

That is basically right. A lot of men did not start with a label and then build their worldview from it. They lived through certain dating experiences first, noticed the same patterns over and over, then found communities where other men were describing what they had already seen. The label came after the observation, not before it. That is why dismissing it like men were just recruited into some belief system is incorrect. Most of the time it was pattern recognition first, community second.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 02:45 PM

It sounds good in theory, but it’s too rigid for how relationships actually work. Trust and vulnerability usually build with connection, not all at once up front. Waiting until there’s some real investment to talk about heavier issues is not a hostage situation, it’s just normal progression. You should be honest about major dealbreakers before things get serious, sure, but trying to lay every card on the table too early turns dating into an interview and kills natural chemistry. Transparency mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 02:42 AM

Being a functioning adult does not make gender roles outdated. A man knowing how to cook and clean, and a woman being able to pay her own bills, is just basic life competence. Gender roles are about the relationship dynamic, and those still matter because men and women usually do not want or thrive in the exact same role.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:34 AM
1

Nah, I would not say that is true for a lot of men. Some men, sure. But saying “a lot” makes it sound way more common than it really is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:41 AM
1

To give up that privilege, they have to really like the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:49 AM
1

Nah, it can actually be great when done right, just like with most things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter