TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrConventional Archive

View 0 posts and 141 comments by MrConventional on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Ironically this script will be flipped in the next 15-25 years as men's education falls through the basement.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:30 PM
1

This is a community of people who seek to foster an atmosphere of thoughtfulness, empowerment, diversity, inspiration, and positivity in the societal progression of men. No one here cares for the ramblings you regurgitate from headlines of conspiracy theory extremists. Your attempts to lie and pretend only fool yourself. You have made it extremely apparent you possess no knowledgeable of any topical social movement. Your failed attempts to argue on any point outright betray your total ignorance.…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 09:23 PM
2

Your analytic incapability will continue to plague you until you begin an effort to grasp the basic fundamentals of logic.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:53 PM
-1

Your concession is accepted.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:50 PM
–

Logic should be formally taught in public schools. Perhaps then people could learn to present arguments while sparing themselves such embarassment
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:48 PM
–

Your complete ignorance on the topics you attempt to engage in are nothing more than a stereotypical embarassment for everyone here. Until you mature to the point you're able to part your head from your ass and present a logical argument, your input will continue to negatively impact everything everyone here stands for. Grow up, kid.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:44 PM
–

You are an embarassment to this sub.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:37 PM
–

Confusing extremist sects of any social construct as representing anyone other than its own extremist threat is nothing more than willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:34 PM
-5

Wrong. Feminism supports mens rights. See third generation oof the mainstream movement, early 1990's.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:28 PM
1

I agree. I looked up some statistics myself in check of the figure given and this is what I found: Of all people in the US prison system, the Bureau of Justice Statistics states states: 22% are hispanic, 37% are white, and 40% are black. (July, 2013: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p12ac.pdf)
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:38 PM
2

You listed two studies by the same professor. To help strengthen the argument you're making, have you found other supporting sources or peer review remarks?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:05 PM
2

Dude, you have issues. This is an objective conversation, no reason to flip shit about people discussing the validity of an arguement's wording. Take some time to talk to someone and get your head straight before you hurt yourself or someone else.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:57 PM
1

Fallacious Ignorance, meet Logic.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:04 PM
–

You're confusing [anything/anyone] with being a tool using fallacious arguments. Equally, "Feminists" and "MRAs" are just as capable of being tools using fallacious arguments as [anything you want to make such fallacious generalizations about].
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:51 PM
2

Comparatively, it's astounding how bizarre the social structures are in American prisons.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:25 PM
14

Here is an easily digestible wiki on abortion as it concerns the United States. Once you familiarize yourself with the topic, you may experience better success with your red herring attempt in the future.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:08 AM
3

I'll... allow it.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 01:04 PM
1

Others needn't assume what you readily showcase. Presenting strawmen does not benefit your position or education. No excuse is needed for what you readily admit you possess no understanding of. There is no misandry present in context, there is extremely legitimate concern here for real environmental threats of the culture. Pursuing education in this matter will help ease your severe confusion in this instance.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 01:43 AM
1

Knowledge prerequisites for understanding material is not an experience limited to school. Your continued willful ignorance is not the fault of this author.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:50 PM
0

When you educate yourself in the greater cultural situation specific matter that I am informing you of, you will understand why you are wrong.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:34 PM
0

This is not a male gaze issue, this is a far more specific cultural matter of the particular environment.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:14 PM
2

Bitched you out for leaving a bucket out after cleaning her car? Commonly treated you with abusive behavior? Congratulations on escaping that horrifically abusive scenario. You have an infinitely brighter future ahead of you with that out of your way. I wish you well in finding someone who treats you with as much love and respect you're willing to treat them.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:48 PM
2

No, moron, check your ignorance.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:37 PM
-2

That is in no way indicative or reflective of feminism.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 02:35 PM
0

That is completely incorrect. Please familiarize yourself with the topic being discussed. Protip: the topic is not "every random girl in America".
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:34 AM
0

Read that again. Swallow the self embarrassment. If you still do not understand, familiarize yourself with the topic being discussed. Repeat ad nauseum.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 07:17 PM
0

Everyone missed the boat here, entirely. Ripping this out of context is really poor taste. Of these victims who are gang raped in cultures as those in context, they are seen as scum worth less than nothing. Pariahs. They are looked at morbidly like monsters from a horror show.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:48 AM
1

I was thinking potential of equal gender protection, but psychopathy knows no bounds.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:54 PM
1

Everything has the possibility for it to be used offensively. Ballpoint pens have the possibility to be used offensively with great effect. Much like any knife or rifle, the tools themselves do not magically harm people. Owning and/or employing such biotechnology might claim some injuries if employed before properly developed. Imagine deploying some like minded technology in parts of the world where rape is so excessively prevalent.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:52 PM
-3

THE BOY WAS NOT LABELED A PREDATOR. The boy's father is referencing the 5 year old girl student who has done sexual activities to multiple 4-5 year old boy students.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:40 PM
-2

Imagine acid punishment for rapists. Imagine a rape fail safe you could somehow apply to oneself for self-defense. I question if that sort of specific biotechnology is available or even feasibly possible. Edit: I was opening discussion about a "Minority Report" consequential future, not suggesting the punishment. Additionally, I was unaware people were so against biotechnology here.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:38 AM
0

You asked for the federal government to provide free condoms: they do. If you want the federal government to increase taxes to pay for increased budgets supporting more services, you are requesting something far more encompassing. Certainly both men and women would benefit from better accessible health care & information; something all relative social movements can agree on.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:28 AM
0

If you live in the United States, your "feminism" is reflected in the federal government providing condoms. Go to your local Department of Health clinic facility, get checked, and practice safe sex.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:24 AM
3

most historical figures have skeletons in the closet, but it does not negate their accomplishments. FTFY
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:27 AM
1

Incorrect. Showing you the flaw of your arguments does not mean that I subscribe to your arguments. Your attempts at defining "legitimate need" are without the slightest logical foundation. Your failure to recognize these factors repeatedly puts everyone in a position to question your ability to consider the variables of importance by which you are attempting to denounce while simultaneously denying their value.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:53 AM
1

I am entertained by your attempts at straw-men and red herrings, but you may have better luck elsewhere. If you think for a moment that you know you have the best team in the nation before they ever play, then you're trapped by your own density. Without the funding in the first place, there is no opportunity for these athletes to be realized. There is no room for your confusion.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 01:32 PM
–

If they deserve it. "Oh, you've got a great competitive athletic team? Sorry, you're not a man playing football. We only give money to the majority of a single sport. Your the best female basketball team in the nation? Too bad, you don't deserve it."
/r/MensRights21/11/12 10:28 AM
–

None of that has any bearing whatsoever on the topic at hand: funding for active athletes. We're not discussing social clubs who sit and admire sports, we're talking funding for teams of people athletically participating. Those are two extremely different things; regardless if your best friend or your mother "likes" sports or not has no bearing on your chosen participation or performance as an athlete. To cut funding by the premise that "some basement dwelling boy/girl doesn't even like sports" …
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:50 PM
0

I am interested in the position of the topic and incredibly displeased in discovering that the one hint of quantitative data in this thread was just bullshit. I'm sorry you have no comprehension of statistics or the importance of quantitative information to support our claims as MRAs, but running around spouting out imaginary statistics is only going to mislead ourselves.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:42 PM
–

Completely incorrect in every imaginable facet further complicated by a slew of logical fallacies; none of which you seem to be aware of. Attempting to reference imaginary statistics that are not related to the topic being discussed does not support your statement whatsoever. When discussing matters of money paid towards athletic programs for active athletes, your statements sadly make no sense. In fact, your guess of these imaginary statistics are not all that well thought out. If one were to a…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:06 PM
–

Do you understand how this difference has no bearing on the women who are athletically active that are interested in sports?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:43 PM
–

Women are as interested in sports as much as any man may be interested in sports. Please rephrase what you are trying to say.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 11:54 AM
1

Women are abused more domestically. Not in the United States.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:13 AM
1

Incorrect. You fail to understand what you've yet to read, but continue to blatantly assume. Additionally, you continue to fail to understand the significance of tremendously greater male victimization numbers while the reality of the matter is that the majority of men do not even report violent crimes committed against them. The fact that you continue to ignore the sources provided to you directly tied to this information and continue to refuse to educate yourself in the matter only reflects yo…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:16 PM
1

I understand you are ignorant and unwilling to consider information presented to you. I understand you are ignorant and unwilling to educate yourself in this matter. I understand you are ignorant and unwilling. Your behavior does only serves to continue your own ignorance. That is the full extent of what your comments present. This point served the end of the conversation many comments ago, but you may continue to embarrass yourself at your leisure. As you come to understand the reality of the s…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:04 PM
-2

Read. You will learn and come to understand reality. This will help you experience less cognitive dissonance as you are faced with reality, resulting in having a nice day :) Good luck. You need it.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:39 AM
-2

Read.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:32 AM
-2

Read.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:22 AM
-2

You are confused. No one is insulting you. I am letting you know.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:12 AM
-1

No, no. That's okay. You've already proven your level of inability to analyze data directly linked to a claim. There's no need to embarrass yourself further in the eyes of being spoon fed information. Your inability to utilize an incredibly popular academic search engine is hilarious in itself. Better trolling next time :) Sleep well, kid
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:03 AM
-2

Click on it. Then go here: Google Scholar. Educate yourself :)
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:52 AM
-2

The information was directly linked. This has been repeatedly told to you time and time again. You're red herrings and inability to analyze information does not offer you grounds to stand on. I am sorry you are continuing to struggle with this, but ignoring the evidence and data is not helping you refrain from embarrassing yourself. If you are still confused, use Google as instructed. Have a nice day :)
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:39 AM
-2

I am sorry you cannot analyze data or read information clearly presented to you. Have a nice day all the same :)
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:32 AM
–

I am sorry you did not read any of the articles or data presented. The last link is in fact not regarding prison rape, it discounts the myth entirely. Please try again. Then pull up Google Scholar and educate yourself on the issue of interest. Have a nice day :)
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:19 AM
–

Please check your browser. You have yet to click on the link supporting the comment with statistics immediately tied to that statement. Have a nice day :)
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:08 AM
–

Less red herrings, more reading the data and awareness presented. Have a good day :)
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:57 AM
–

Read my post. Then read the source. usdoj.gov Specifically and clearly defines males as such. The other sources were matters pertaining directly to what they were linked to; do not waste my time with red herrings. I'm sorry you're divorced of reality and I hope you begin to recognize this is a serious male issue. Please adjust your perception of reality to include male victims of violence.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:40 AM
–

I understand that is a facet of the martial schools, but was told this does not define them. My knowledge is limited only by what I've asked. I've trained with women who have been trained in those schools, but those women and I weren't training Bujinkan at that time.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:51 PM
–

Actually, the reality is much more severe than that in America. Contrary to what many people understand, men are predominately the victims of domestic violence in America. [ Violent victimization rates by gender, 1973-2009 ]. If a man comes to you and confides information to you, take him seriously. If you witness domestic violence, support him as best you can for it is likely he will not report it or appropriately contact help. If you are unfamiliar with the many signs of domestic violence, con…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:21 PM
–

+1, I lol'd Interestingly, there are actually two schools of martial arts incorporated in Bujinkan strictly for women ninja only. Surprisingly well protected and the seminars for those are rarely taught, as finding those trained in those schools is a task in itself. Men are forbidden, but everyone is really pretty cool with it. Of course, we do not pretend whatsoever that men and women are identical - the kinesthetics make it self-apparent from day 1. They're no worse off for it, but even the ro…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:16 PM
–

America.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:37 PM
0

Aecidiaceae, I understand your frustration and am actively working on an answer to the frustration you share in the form of a new self-defense organization. In the meantime, recognize that the RAD program does offer courses for men. Additionally, you can even become a certified RAD trainer and I encourage you to apply for that opportunity. There are a few primary reasons why I would encourage you to look elsewhere instead of a RAD program designed for women defending against men if you desire to…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:50 PM
0

Are you familiar with the United States Department of Justice?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:34 PM
5

The following definition is used by the FBI. Rape is: “The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:23 PM
2

"Wooowwwwwwwww." Dude, that... that is awful. Complete shit.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 01:17 AM
1

It gives me anxiety to get hot girls, and it gives me anxiety to not have them. That’s why I’ve never been in a meaningful relationship before. While wrong, you've hit an interesting mark. You still think of women as objects, objects that you don't have, and this serves a massive barrier of entry to you. Women are so foreign to you that you can't relate to them. Hot women, ugly women, the girl next door, or whomever: you're not on their level and it's eating at you to the point of self-defeating…
/r/seduction30/07/12 01:23 PM
0

Picasso might have scribbled on a napkin, but that would not necessarily make it his best work. The Game, on the other hand, I can only hope might serve as the antithesis for any argument concerning the quality of his writing. I have had no exposure to Strauss outside of the disappointing "work" in question.
/r/seduction16/07/12 04:05 PM
0

it certainly was well written Did we read the same book?
/r/seduction16/07/12 07:11 AM
0

I never have understood people's infatuation with Neil Strauss' horrible material. Sadly, I am all to familiar with wannabe Strauess-etes. Why do people subscribe to such awful advice?
/r/seduction15/07/12 09:47 PM
3

I love to see breakthroughs in this sub-reddit. It's such a beautiful moment and a calm relaxing breather from the wannabe-"pua" wannbe-"alpha" bull shit. Congratulations.
/r/seduction03/07/12 05:17 PM
5

What?! You can tell a *person** to not put oneself in a possibly bad situation; that's called common sense!
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:01 PM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 09:59 PM
3

NATURAL CHEMISTRY ALWAYS TOPS SCRIPTS
/r/seduction02/06/12 04:15 AM
17

I wish more people here understood this.
/r/seduction07/05/12 08:39 PM
0

You are right. Additionally, the environment influences the subconscious mind. This is likely what OP is referencing. If you're already the motha'fuckin'man ~ swag out
/r/seduction29/04/12 07:46 AM
18

BEAT HIM
/r/seduction18/04/12 05:40 PM
3

Take note of the lesson in OP's post. This is not just a female-gender matter, it applies to you and the people you interact with as well. Take note of this and start expanding your philosophy with your instinct. The people you are talking to are no different from you in this respect. If you want to fuck with trash, you can bait it with trash. If you want to step up to anything worth talking about, realize that the only valuable shit in your treasure chest are the epiphanies that take place in y…
/r/seduction04/04/12 10:56 PM
-1

Did you read my comment? Have you read this thread? Stop words in my mouth, it is a silly behavior. Stop with the straw man attacks. No is making any argument of "respectful" or "honorable" mentions of aborting fetuses or killing babies. Please read a comment before you respond to a comment. Thank you.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 08:24 PM
-1

Defense of a straw man attack with another straw man attack. I value your commitment to the strategy. Stop wasting my time with arguments in your head that you are truly the only participant in.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:59 PM
–

I don't know what happened to my comment, but I pointed out you're making straw man argument. Trying to relay what I have said in the context I have said them into a misrepresented position is not a case of reductio ad absurdum. Read the comment again. Read the context. Thank you participating in our community, but don't waste my time chasing my own tail with a message I am not relaying at all within a different context than matters I did not address whatsoever in my comment. Thank you.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:38 PM
–

You're wrong: that is what I said. Your straw man argument is a waste of our time. Maybe you are legitimately confused about what is being discussed, so I'll clarify for the valued sake of your participation in our community. We are not discussing any immaturity or lack of parental ability by some generic woman. We are discussing men's rights. There are two scenarios: (1) an instance where men and women could facilitate an agreement of what to do with an expected child or (2) walking away from o…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:23 PM
0

It is that easy. Stop over complicating what has been going on all throughout human history.
/r/seduction03/04/12 07:14 PM
-1

That's a lot of excuses for not being successful. No one cares when you fail. Failure is an important part of life. All that occurred over the last month is that whatever you based your battle plan on became painful obvious it is flawed. This is not your fault for material selection, it is merely reflecting how shitty most material in this community is on average. Let go of the material and be human. Your success rate can only improve.
/r/seduction03/04/12 06:02 PM
–

That is exactly what I was said. Complaining that the complete opposite should be true is not sensible.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:58 PM
0

Doesn't getting 4 failures out of about 240 approaches shows this is basically a numbers game? No, it shows that this community is going to hell in a hand basket. When you have guys coming in saying that they consider that 98% of women were not even willing to give him the time of day "success", then it is because of something we are doing wrong in relaying this information. When you go 0/240, it's a sure sign you are shooting yourself in the foot nonstop. Instead of objectifying women into 240 …
/r/seduction03/04/12 09:12 AM
1

0/200 may signal that you should consider switching up your act.
/r/seduction03/04/12 09:03 AM
0

What women already have. Which is the fucking issue. Stop trying to play favorites and settle the shit even.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:00 AM
–

What if a man wants to abort the child and the mother wants to keep it? One party desires to keep the child. Should he be able to legally force her to get an abortion? That is insane. Enduring an abortion is not a fucking cakewalk on any level. If the child is kept, does the MRM believe the man should be able to opt out of child support payments? Sadly, now we have entered a completely different discussion. I am very against "child support payments" and the system, but at that point in time you'…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 01:00 AM
2

7 guys for every 1 girl Stopped reading there.
/r/seduction04/03/12 02:40 AM
9

Sometimes someone challenges me to push-ups. I don't know why. It happens. Because you talk about your work out.
/r/seduction21/02/12 08:00 PM
7

getting out of a 2.5 year relationship that had turned me into a punk bitch. Truth.
/r/seduction21/02/12 07:56 PM
8

This one hurt, because I thought it was going somewhere. Whoa, buddy. You didn't make a mistake. Completely different scenario, man. Don't be so hard on yourself. If things are going in the right direction, then things are going in the right direction. She just wasn't that into you as she got to know you, but that's just her. Leave it be and try not to ruminate over it. Confusing developing relationships you're locking in with the chum we throw the sharks can have disastrous results.
/r/seduction21/02/12 04:05 PM
1

No one suggested anything that you are saying clifton and no one is suggesting the propagated mentality. Work on essential communication skills and further develop an understanding of the dynamics of interpersonal relationships. It's best to own up to what you want instead of trying to trick people, one way or another. A person doesn't have to rip off their testicles to be upfront with what one wants out of one's relationships as they further develop. Being manipulative and deceiving will only e…
/r/seduction31/01/12 02:47 AM
1

There is confusion between the framing of posts in this subreddit and your expressed window of application.
/r/seduction31/01/12 02:42 AM
1

Not at all. What we are talking about here are life skills applicable to all.
/r/seduction30/01/12 09:31 PM
1

You're attempting to bring a subjective perspective to an objective question.
/r/seduction30/01/12 10:02 AM
0

You can't expect people to not fuck each other before there is a 100% chance that both of them want to be in a long-term relationship with each other. What are you talking about?
/r/seduction30/01/12 10:01 AM
3

I have strict parents so this was my first time out late I am 20 I don't understand.
/r/seduction30/01/12 08:35 AM
4

No. No. We're not something you turn on or off, dabble in on the weekends, or meet up with your team to practice. Every day. All the time.
/r/seduction30/01/12 08:33 AM
3

Pegging. Lots of pegging.
/r/seduction30/01/12 08:28 AM
2

She had been into OP previously. She was the hunter. The combo-breaker was super effective at keeping him from going home with another girl. She got laid like she wanted without strutting around or taking any shit from competition. She won, no questions about it.
/r/seduction30/01/12 08:27 AM
2

She's my house mate DANGER
/r/seduction30/01/12 08:24 AM
9

chick liked me, we had sex, i told her im not looking for anything serious. She cried, she said she will wait for me. 1 A woman was really into you. 3 You had sex. 2 THEN you told her she was just a one night stand. Getting 2 and 3 out of order was your problem. If you want to avoid these problem in the future, be straight up before you have sex that you aren't looking for anything serious.
/r/seduction30/01/12 08:22 AM
4

Fuck if I do the chasing, girls come to me. Edit: No one will ever appreciate the amount of time I put into failing to make this witty with all the gifs.
/r/seduction29/01/12 10:11 PM
0

What kind of woman doesn't love long walks on the beach during a full moon?! New: You're too overdressed.
/r/seduction25/01/12 12:17 AM
1

Why do facts of some kid matter to anyone here? What the fuck is this subreddit becoming, a Tribunal? Mean Girls? Forget it.
/r/seduction09/01/12 07:52 PM
6

Chill on it. Lean back and smile. You do not want her to know that you know that she is crazy by any means whatsoever. She may actually just be having a momentary blip of lust mixed with a lot of excitement [don't sell yourself short, bro]. The important thing here is to easily let the screen fade to black, don't fuck this chick because your social scene will get wrecked, and if you are going to risk everything you've got going for you anyway then make sure to pay attention to the following: "I …
/r/seduction08/01/12 03:39 AM
2

In all actuality, if you can coach a man to believe he possess value you can basically throw him into a pack of women and watch the carnage start. I understand what the OP is getting at, but the idea that we would at all undercut the power of individual-to-individual interactions is weak form.
/r/seduction03/01/12 10:05 AM
1

Yup! :D
/r/seduction21/12/11 10:45 AM
1

Mirror neurons are great like that.
/r/seduction21/12/11 09:24 AM
1

Were you successful in being calm, cool, and confident when you wanted to be calm, cool, and confident?
/r/seduction21/12/11 08:43 AM
3

calm, cool, and collected This is all that need be said. It's simple and accessible to live by. No need to fake it. :)
/r/seduction21/12/11 08:32 AM
1

Yes, to participate in a conversation it is important to digest the information that is being presented so you can participate progressively. Repeating your whining about how lying, faking, and dehumanizing people should be an acceptable success equation to the person who is telling you "that's not the case" and expecting to get some other response than "that's not the case, stop making excuses for it" is naive. I have actively presented you as much new material as you've asked for or triggered …
/r/seduction15/12/11 10:02 PM
0

You don't read in the first place. That's why you continue to post and embarrass yourself with each entry. You're just repeating this "uughhhh, it should be okay to dehumanize people because people are different and I don't know how to talk to people or listen without turning them into a number or doing a trick uuuhhhhh" and I'm going to consistently tell you to stop whining like a bitch, it's not going to change the fact that being a fake ass creep is never acceptable for any reason at all. We …
/r/seduction15/12/11 08:45 PM
0

You should really try and read -> Then comment. It will help you not look like a complete idiot when you talk, but also help you understand what it is you are trying to talk about. You must have missed the point where lying only hurts social anxiety in every way because it builds more anxiety. Stop being fake. Stop lying. Stop encouraging others to do what you do in being fake and lying. Stop whining like a bitch. Stop making excuses. Grow up past your need to attach your ego to behaving this wa…
/r/seduction15/12/11 08:31 PM
0

Nope. You're lying again and referencing posts in the exact opposite manner of what they say. We are all telling you to stop being fake. You're arguing and whining that being fake is acceptable. Stop being fake. Stop lying. Grow up. Then stop being a whiny bitch when you get shut down for running your mouth. :)
/r/seduction15/12/11 08:29 PM
1

Wrong. Again. Stop whining like a bitch. Stop lying. We do not care about you. You cannot comprehend the idea of being genuine. Refusing to dehumanize people is completely the opposite of why you're talking. Go read a book of the social psychology variety, it may help your game and general ability to comprehend these conversations. :)
/r/seduction15/12/11 08:24 PM
1

Wrong. It is your promotion of lying that brings people further away from self-actualization than anything. You do not know me, but let me help you relate and stop bitch-whining like a douche. I know what it's like to have crushing social anxiety. I know what it's like to go through anxiety attacks in general. I recognize trauma from first hand events, it's called empathy, and can relate directly through personal events. I recognize depression and relate to too many variations. Self-sabotage is …
/r/seduction15/12/11 08:12 PM
0

I quoted you in full and broke down to exactly the narrative you're pushing. You asked for it. I delivered. Stop being fake. Stop lying. Stop promoting this horrific misinterpretation to others.
/r/seduction15/12/11 07:54 PM
1

This entire argument boils down to this: Some people can't be genuine at first. people can't be genuine You are wrong. You do not need to lie to yourself or to people just to get laid. You are selling yourself out. You are selling others out by promoting this. Even on the most basic level PUA culture is not about lying to yourself, at all; it's about stepping up to who you are. You do not need to be a liar. You do not need to be fake. PUA culture is not about being fake. PUA culture is about ove…
/r/seduction15/12/11 07:47 PM
1

Not at all. You don't have to invest energy and effort into lying to people, dehumanizing people, or otherwise presenting a bunch of fake bullshit just to get laid. Stop selling yourself out. There is no need to be a liar day in and day out to hook up with people, we're all horny by nature. Let sexuality express itself naturally.
/r/seduction15/12/11 07:29 PM
1

Stop lying. It's really that simple. This is the only universal rule we are talking about. Being a fake ass creep is directly spawned of lying to yourself and others. Informing you that "lying and being fake is not a good idea" is not a matter of knowing others at any level whatsoever; your whining is completely invalid. Stop whining like a bitch to the only one giving you the pro-tip that being genuine is the way to go. I can't help but express my lack of giving a fuck about your excuses throug…
/r/seduction15/12/11 07:18 AM
0

You are way too emotionally attached to the idea that you and others must be fake. Some people can't be genuine at first. Stop perpetuating the idea that people aren't good enough. Some people lock up with anxiety when they come in contact with another person. That is why it is important to learn to talk to people, to be who you are, and learn that you are good enough to be worth someone's time without pretending to be someone else. That's the difference between being a fake creeper and expressi…
/r/seduction14/12/11 07:48 PM
-1

Your inability to read or comprehend the concept of simply "being genuine" amuses me.
/r/seduction14/12/11 07:05 PM
-1

No.
/r/seduction14/12/11 07:02 PM
-1

No one is. You only make yourself look worse by perpetuating the behavior spoken about in this thread. No one cares about you, especially when your ego blinds you into such vanity. You are not a unique snowflake, but you don't have to act like a clown. Now go forth and learn the ways of being a human being and treating other people like human beings instead of whining like a bitch! :D YOU CAN DO IT!
/r/seduction14/12/11 06:54 PM
-1

Please read before replying to posts in the future and you may come to better understand why you're only perpetuating your own silliness.
/r/seduction14/12/11 06:51 PM
-1

Keep the excuses coming for why being fake and dehumanizing people is cool, it's awesome!
/r/seduction14/12/11 06:32 PM
0

Please, continue your whining.
/r/seduction14/12/11 03:48 AM
-1

Others are far better at explaining this than I objectively as you are requesting, but there are redditors in this subreddit that have done a very strong job. I wish I had links ready on hand. (A) Be human. (B) Live passionately. Stop stressing out. (C) Let go of your social insecurities. Abandon the "a->d...->?" scripts. They are all inherently designed to fail by merit of their fabrication. Most tools don't realize the texts and strategies they swear by are not actual instruction manual. The e…
/r/seduction13/12/11 07:31 PM
-1

You're wrong, entirely. I will not accept your misplaced accusations and so your words are yours alone to own. I'm not better or worse than you in relation to you lighting yourself on fire. You're only hurting yourself and yourself alone. The rest of the population is not negatively impacted beyond direct interaction with those who dehumanize others. Stop shitting on yourself with the stale narratives being discussed; no one wants to put up with the smell. tl;dr: You don't have to be a clown to …
/r/seduction13/12/11 07:06 PM
0

Telling someone not to light themselves on fire because it is a bad idea that damages your ability to function is not condescension. Sure, suicidal individuals may find it's a really painful way to die or monks may use it as a powerful form of off putting people from an idea, but it's generally not advisable in accomplishing day to day tasks like interacting with other human beings. You don't need to sound intellectual to pick up women. You don't have to pretend to be the lost cast member from T…
/r/seduction13/12/11 01:43 AM
1

You are completely right, there is nothing wrong with trying to hook up with people for the sake of hooking up with someone. Or you can stop trying to force it with following the silly script and start exploring sexuality naturally. Thing is, so many children and immature boys get caught up with these scripts and ignore why their failure rate is astronomical. While learning to get out there in the first place is incredibly important, do not perpetuate the same immaturity that makes people buy in…
/r/seduction13/12/11 12:36 AM
2

That's because adults do not talk or think anything like what so much of this silly shit leads you to believe. When you've actually got it figured out, you don't need to obsess with this retarded shit tools mentally masturbate with. When did we lose sight that women are not robots and men are not tools? You are a human being. Anyone you are going to be interested in are human beings. If you are just looking to score with whatever you can manage, then you're wasting your time and everyone else's.…
/r/seduction12/12/11 09:07 AM
12

Nope, just time to leave.
/r/seduction22/11/11 08:22 PM
2

This was not a case of oneitis. This was an attempt at a legitimate relationship. Too many people get caught up thinking life is always a game; protip: not everyone is looking for casual sex all the time. People fail to see when people are being serious or otherwise cannot imagine mature personal interaction beyond the word of whichever subscription they swear by. People who make those mistakes do not actually possess any understanding of what takes place between people whatsoever. Whomever conv…
/r/seduction16/11/11 07:08 AM
3

Sounds like OP is more of the bulbasaur type.
/r/seduction15/11/11 08:51 PM
4

Dude, it wasn't that she was hot that you felt the way you did; there are countless hot women in the world who are lonely and want to be held [etc. etc.]. What strikes here is who you thought she was and who you turned out to be in a contrasting way that made this one seem different. It's a great lesson, but it just goes to show that any person is accessible and yet still may not be your ideal. Someone can seem perfect, but no one is perfect, much less two people together. tl;dr Pikachu, we real…
/r/seduction15/11/11 08:18 PM
1

What if you have a sensory deprivation device on?
/r/seduction26/10/11 09:34 PM
1

Rape?
/r/seduction26/10/11 05:40 PM
2

Remember, the scientific method describes all things as [improbable] not [impossible], as probabilities possess a margin of error.
/r/seduction26/10/11 05:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter