TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrDoradus Archive

View 0 posts and 381 comments by MrDoradus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

"You have a 75% higher chance at getting a higher up job" "Qualifications make you have a higher chance at a job" It really isn't as much about the junk that is or isn't dangling in your southern parts and much more about who you know.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 08:51 AM
0

The thinking less of someone part is a bit subjective. Personally, I couldn't care less if a woman sleeps around and it wouldn't change in any way how I'd interact with her as a friend or colleague. But at the same time someone like that surely wouldn't be on my potential partner list. So someone could still technically claim I think less of women who "hoe out" because of that, even though my opinion of them wouldn't change in any other way than my partner preference.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:17 PM
8

Maybe you should take that tone with your GF and not randoms on the internet trying to point out your making excuses for your GF. ETA: to be a bit more constructive, having visible marks of being hit and her not hurting you are mutually exclusive statements. It was your choice to drive drunk, so you're at fault. But she played a major role in your decision and her attitude towards you was completely unacceptable. Make all the excuses you want, but what you described was toxic af. The sooner you …
/r/MensRights18/10/21 11:46 AM
14

Maybe you should take that tone with your GF and not randoms on the internet trying to point out your making excuses for your GF.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 09:00 AM
9

it does not concern them in the slightest. While I agree that the woman should have a majority vote on what happens to the baby it really shouldn't be a 100 - 0 vote like it is now. A man's role in deciding if the baby should be brought to full term is completely ignored; when there's a difference in opinion the man has to either: a.) pay child support, even if he wanted nothing to do with the child. Imho, it's a scummy mentality that you'd want nothing to do with your child, but keeping fathers…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:12 AM
53

People often forget that not wanting to be executed is a basic human instinct and isn't exclusive to one sex. And if you can pull trigger you can "stand and fight", so limiting that to men is also a double standard. And yeah, I've also seen a few hot takes on the topic. Most egregious one was a news anchor chiming in with "And this video Anna, makes it terrifying to think about what leaving Afganistan is going to mean for women. You know historically marginalised, now the concerns about their sa…
/r/MensRights17/08/21 10:14 PM
25

It's clear who's doing the real hard work keeping the household going. One load of laundry and dishes a day just isn't the same thing. Hopefully you realise you're taking a quite similar, but opposing, stance to that of the feminist moms. If you had in mind a couple where only the husband was working and the wife was a stay at home mom, I could see your point, but in a scenario where both are working the tasks that you listed are pretty much equal in keeping the household going.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 03:36 PM
5

The middle ground is being slowly but surely eroded in most public discussions. If you don't completely agree with the narrative of any given side you're very likely to be attacked. Since almost nothing is white and black that results in bad arguments that overplay one and completely downplay the other side of any given issue. That leaves people with either the circle jerk arguments or with attacking opposing views, no matter their merit. The more complex an issue is the more likely your view is…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 12:57 PM
77

"Men have had no oppression", "Stop acting like men are oppressed bruh" Wonder if people that hold this opinion never actually heard of conscription or they don't think that it was/is a big deal.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 12:46 PM
85

Something similar happened to me in my literary class. A professor refused any other interpretation of a particular work than the "official" one that was pretty much a feminist manifesto. I got flunked twice and a single failing grade during the whole year would have meant I'd have to repeat it. Regurgitating the crap we were taught left an extremely poor taste in my mouth and the professor was so petty that she wrote "it's nice that you finally read the book" when she graded the essay. Their po…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 09:29 PM
28

Googled the actual Tweet and the teacher professor is named, with reviews of her teaching being available online that support this level of stupidity.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 09:15 PM
3

"STOP SEXISM" It wouldn't be a good feminist poster without a touch of "unintentional irony".
/r/MensRights13/01/17 12:38 PM
3

We're all intrinsically biased, meaning we all have existing predispositions and when evaluating certain topics we will mostly look for evidence which confirms our doubts about something we doubt or mostly look for confirmation of something we believe in, completely missing the objective truth on many occasions. That's why open, both sides presented, discussions are very important when evaluating just about any issue, because it's hard to see it really objectively without open discussion. Even l…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 12:44 PM
24

"Aren't they preaching hate?" Isn't trying to get something banned also preaching hate? Especially when that something's biggest offense is having a different view on the current sociopolitical atmosphere in most of 1st world countries. So shouldn't she also think that feminists who banned the movie need to be banned too, if she used the same kind of logic?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:51 AM
7

Just because someone has a handicap doesnt exempt them from a certain behavior, it merely gives a reason that makes it understandable, but does not make it ok. It does, period. People like him can still be functioning members of our society but when they do something that isn't socially acceptable and can't read that they're making people uncomfortable, other individuals need to remind them that what they're doing isn't right. You just don't stay silent, let your imagination do laps in your head…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 12:19 PM
237

"1. That man is not autistic." Good thing she's educated and has a degree in a medical/psychological field so that she was able to give the man a medical evaluation. It'd be a completely douchebag move from her if she was simply pulling this out of her arse, wouldn't it. I mean she does belong to a group that has individuals that go bananas when people don't call them by their preferred pronoun. It'd be very, very hypocritical if she intentionally mislabelled someone with an actual medical condi…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 11:59 AM
4

That might be the easiest way out for her but her publicly admitting she made it all up will bring her victims most peace imho, it would clear up their name once and for all. And that's why they probably offered this deal to begin with, couple that with the probability she'll never be able to pay it off anyway and it makes perfect sense. And though it sets a dangerous precedent this was a unique example (she was probably heavily influenced by those politicians to come up with the lie), so I hope…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 07:44 AM
22

Video posted: 20. nov. 2014 Comment posted: two months ago says I havent got custody of my kids back yet. I had court yesterday to address that my daughter madison who is 8 years old is being punched in the face by a 14 year old boy and the mother wont stop it from happening. all the judge did was gave her a warning telling her if she does not stop it then she has a chance of having the kids return home to me How does one live with this hanging over his head? I can't even imagine how powerless t…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 06:45 PM
6

It's not the first result but it is on the first page. Not sure what a 6 hour old highly opinionated article is doing on the first page, but I guess it was promoted or something like that. So I guess that's working as it should. All in all, it's just another article fixating on "the women in third world countries" and "we once couldn't vote" trump cards, which yet again apparently suffice for the author to justify all her biased and uninformed views. The only thing that can be said is that I've …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 12:10 AM
41

A gang of four vigilantes murderers battered a man to death with a hammer after getting involved with a street argument he was having with his girlfriend, a court heard today. Russell Peachey, 35, was allegedly found lying in a pool of his own blood in Grangetown, Cardiff, after a ‘brutal and merciless’ attack that followed a row with his partner Tracey Gill. Christopher Smith, 41, Dean Beasley, 37, Shamander Singh, 35, and James Williams, 31, are all said to have murdered a man intervened after…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:54 PM
2

It was, and if one reads the initials of every sentence, they'll see what the defense will be.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 07:42 AM
5

Volumes of records can be found that testify there's nothing a mother wouldn't do out of love for her children. As that probably was the cause for her actions in this case also, the mother obviously thought she was doing something in the best interest of her child. Great moms that would do anything for their children shouldn't be taken away from them, or serve time when their children need them the most. If you ask any random person, he'll tell you a child needs his mother. No one can deny she d…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:48 PM
2

I really dislike the whole current notion of what the term gender means. It gets even worse when both sex and gender are translated into the same single world in my language. I'll never forget having spent a whole night arguing with a guy who kept claiming we have 48 sexes, wholeheartedly meaning we have 48 different biological sexes. It could be a wrong interpretation on my part stemming from different translations in my mother language but I always have and always will define gender as one's s…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:31 PM
5

He/she did go too far banning you just because of these comments and the mod's biases do show. That being said the thread you were commenting in was very supportive of the guy, at least that was nice.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:47 AM
13

How was that not first degree murder? Someone hiding a gun in her crotch to smuggle it into a strip club is not enough for a premeditated murder charge if it's a woman that that's getting charged it seems.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:36 PM
5

I think it'd be hard for the author of the article to miss the point of the study more than he already did. He even misinterpreted a direct quote of the author of the study: “There is an idea that women are allowed to bask in the reflected glory of her male partner and to be the ‘woman behind the successful man,’ but the reverse is not true for men”, to which he replies: "So wait, society has an entrenched idea that it’s OK for women to stand behind a more successful man but not the other way ar…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:13 PM
2

Implicit self-esteem: they took the results and "worked" on them with a certain equation to "find out" what the participant really meant when they answered the questions. Explicit self esteem: exact responses the participants gave. A fun fact, there is no difference between explicit self-esteem of men and women in regards to their partner's success. Meaning that men evaluated their self-esteem in the same manner women did in regards to their partner's success. So the only difference between the …
/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:13 PM
3

Not to derail the topic but Americans have an extremely delusional view of socialism and they're bad mouthing Sanders way too much because of that. To imply free college education would be on par with giving everyone a pony is very uninformed. But from this individual's writing it's easy to conclude it wouldn't even matter if Sanders had an election program that she would agree with completely, even then she'd still be voting for Hilary only because of her sex. One of the worst reasons to vote f…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:12 PM
2

She feels no remorse for her actions and probably still somehow feels like she was the victim here. She even laughs about what she did while saying that she realises how bad it was and how sorry she is. Those two sentiments just don't go together and I'm inclined to believe the laughing part is how she really feels about it. Jerry (the husband) said it quite nicely in the ending and I do agree that she seems to be an excellent manipulator and probably hasn't stopped with her obsession yet. A com…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:53 PM
24

It's weird how a superimposed and quite frankly very inappropriate photo can completely change the feeling an article should give to an average reader just skimming through. "They have to marry two women or face life in jail? Damn, that's not that bad I'd love to marry these two women in the photo" is apparently the first thought many readers had judging by the comment section, in great part because of the photo used. Change the photo from two fairly attractive women to two troglodytes and the f…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:11 AM
17

These writers can more easily peddle outrage to their consumer-base, which mostly consists of angry feminists, than they can positive articles. It's no wonder they are constantly outraged about something, it's what their target demographic want so hear to continue fuelling their constant anger at the world, or better yet men. A simple, quite possibly Machiavellian, supply demand oriented opinion piece, but I could be wrong and the original author could indeed be suffering from a serious case of …
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:48 PM
12

It's not about the purchase, it's about your willingness to keep living in a relationship with a control freak that's apparently smothering you. I personally can't even entertain the notion of someone telling me what I can and can't buy, so I can't give you any unbiased advice. It just wouldn't work for me. You have to consider for yourself if you're willing to keep sacrificing your "desires" to maintain the status quo of your relationship because you fear what might happen if you don't listen t…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:33 PM
263

The guy supposedly didn't press any charges against her and settled with the woman for a small sum of money. She was said to have cried crocodile tears after being arrested and begged him not to press charges, saying it would negatively affect/ruin her career and she'd get fired. I'm sure the guy was put in an awkward situation and didn't want to ruin someone's life (or so he believed), so I'll reserve my judgement on him. I just hope he didn't go easy on her because of his white-knight-ism and …
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:05 PM
2

Not at all. Even I was operating under the assumption this subreddit as a whole classifies cuckolding as OP does, which would mean it's not the same as cheating, despite it being only that by standard definition. If that's not the case, even my comment only further confused the issue at hand, because mixing up terms or giving them "personalized" definitions can only lead to confusion.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:45 PM
1

I haven't seen the term cuckold to mean the act of a woman deceiving her partner into believing a child is his*, when it isn't, outside this subreddit either. OP presented it as such and I have seen at least one other post using the term cuckolding as lying to a man about being the biological father of the child. It makes sense and it does actually mean that from a biological perspective too. Outside of the subreddit it's almost universally used to simply mean female adultery, yes, though it is …
/r/MensRights20/01/16 04:30 PM
19

You have to be more clear on your definitions here, cuckolding isn't simply cheating and shouldn't be used interchangeably with that term. Both men and women cheat on their partners and it does have a negative social stigma in general public. Every single friend of mine, men and women alike, were told to dump their partners after they even "only" (compared to cuckolding) cheated on them. It's a breach of one of the most important trusts in a relationship. If you saw any sentiments that made wome…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 01:48 PM
3

I really don't understand what happened, the title doesn't match the description. Who was arguing with whom? From what I gathered Bonello was talking to another man, possibly one of his friends, about salaries in tennis, the girlfriend sat down next to him said "I'm a woman, what's your point?" and signalled to her boyfriend who then sucker-punched an older man. I see no arguing in this, just eavesdropping and a sucker punch without any prior indication. And I just love how the author tries to p…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:22 PM
1

I don't know, I think that he and you are looking at this from the wrong perspective. My personal opinion on the matter is that every individual deserves praise for keeping his/her home clean, not just men but women too. Even if they are neat freaks and have no problems with doing so. So I see no reason to argue semantics when someone compliments a guy for "doing his part", the main problem is that people don't compliment women as much and come to expect it from them. So if the author would comp…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 04:50 PM
1

Which wording would that be, helps around the house? I don't know, I personally do a lion's share of all household chores, both cleaning and a lot of maintenance and I still wouldn't be "offended" by someone saying helps around the house. Because most of my male friends, family members too, do next to nothing when it comes to cleaning and some even when it comes to maintenance. From this, albeit small, sample group I can honestly say women still do the most of the household chores which we can s…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 09:50 AM
0

I saw this video mentioned before but never actually watched it. Is this what people label as objectifying? A few quick glances, with maybe one being a bit on the "turned-on side". While I agree that even if she did longingly stare at them it wouldn't be anything to scowl about (these are some prime examples of male fitness she would be attracted to, who could blame her), I argue that she wasn't even objectifying anyone in the first place. It's just another example of people being over-sensitive…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:10 AM
46

“There is just no place for that sort of behaviour. The Melbourne Renegades club is all about its appeal to kids, families and females,” That means it's a "no men" club? Hopefully all male supporters of this club, in any shape or form, take note and back someone else up. They'll see how much support they actually get from listed groups. And I do hope he doesn't apologise, it will set a dangerous precedent for any and all future "incidents" like. I'm with Piers on this one, outraged at the outrag…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 08:59 PM
3

Why they say that statement is sexist? Because it's an easy way for them to dismiss your argument and appear to have won the debate, in the eyes of like-minded individuals, by assuming the "moral high ground". It's basically a plea to emotions in others to garner support for your argument, a very bad way of debating which seems to work because people tend to just gloss over things and might actually agree it's "sexist" because of that. The same goes for cries of racism, sexism, misogyny,... whic…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 08:39 AM
1

All my comments and opinions are from the perspective of the guy. Because I wouldn't do the same in his shoes it doesn't mean I think she's a child and can't make decisions for herself, she can. And again, if you don't agree with me and think the guy is completely in the right, go ahead, I ain't stopping you. You're entitled to your opinion on this topic and no one is universally right. PS; anyone misinterpreting my comments and calling me dumb in the process really should take a step back and s…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:40 AM
1

Sure, be mad a the world. You'll grow out of it someday and understand what grown-ups are talking about.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:21 AM
4

You are mixing two very different terms, let me write it out so it's perfectly clear: responsibility/agency =/= maturity. Your whole argument is based on your misinterpretation of my comment... Nowhere did I mention that the girl has no agency (though legally she isn't even an adult yet and can't do anything without the permission of her parents), my only point is that it's a bit distasteful (distasteful to me, I won't get all pissy if you don't feel the same and want to date 40 year old women/m…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 11:54 PM
5

No, I was speaking from personal experiences and how me and my peers behaved in our teens, but I took a minute out of my time to look for a source for you. I personally can't understand how anyone would think young adults (or in this case a 17 yo) are as mature as people in their forties, but hey, it is a highly subjective topic and some might think they were completely mature already when 17 and think everyone was like them. That's just not the case.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 09:56 PM
11

As much as I'd like to argue these articles were written by different authors with possibly completely different outlooks on life, we can safely say they both report to the same bosses, who approve of the take on the story or not. And I doubt they would ever, in a million years, approve an author to run an article on Jennifer Lawrence and her nudes with similar outlook/message as the Hulk Hogan's article had. Who knows, it's possible John and A.J. would take the same stance on the nude photos as…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 05:55 PM
10

I'm not shaming anyone, I just don't think a 17 year old is mature enough to have a healthy relationship with an older individual, man or a woman. And any grown-up entering in such a relationship is being a bit selfish, that's why it's a grey area to me. Feel free to disagree, it's a subjective topic. You have drunk the Kool-Aid and are sex shaming him. Are you being sarcastic and mockingly trying to support your views like a feminist would hers, or was this a genuine statement?
/r/MensRights31/12/15 05:01 PM
8

17 is a bit of a grey area imo, especially for a 49 yo. But saying it's ironic because he worked with children is just intentionally dishonest and tries to paint a different picture than what actually happened. He is not a paedophile and she isn't a child. Ruin a man's life and get more of the public to outright condemn his actions, which they otherwise might not if the reporting was unbiased? No problem, just as long if it gets us more clicks.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 04:22 PM
1

Depends greatly on your friend in question. I also have a few "extremist" liberal friends which aren't completely consumed by feminism but they also, very uncritically I must say, gobbled up all the feminist propaganda and perceive it as great injustice that women are paid less and have to suffer other daily disadvantages feminist claim to be the case. On the second issue, daily life interactions, you simply can't convince anyone who doesn't differentiate between their own anecdotal (and often e…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 03:27 PM
15

I'll do everyone a favour and sum this up in two words: "citation needed". Other than that, it's a black woman projecting her experiences (real or mostly made up/blown out of proportion, we'll never know) on the school system as a whole. Most listed "ways" don't even have to do with the curriculum or teaching, but rather revolve around how she felt when experiencing micro-aggressions.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 02:53 PM
6

Didn't even know that subreddit existed. And it was what exactly like I expected it to be, only low hanging fruit (questionable posts and comments, even by MRM standards) on there by which everyone in the comments are simply "outraged". No discussions to be had on there, just a echoey "wow, these MRAs are so dum dum". Just let them be, I doubt you'd achieve anything if you wanted to start a discussion on there. But if we return on topic here, only very biased people, like those who frequent the …
/r/MensRights31/12/15 11:16 AM
7

Starting the page on the topic of MRM by quoting a feminist and her thoughts about MRM is the one of the least rational and most biased things one can do. This gives any actually rationally thinking individual a clear indication as to what the rest of the "entry" has in store for the reader. I hope no one takes this 7th grade level reasoning seriously.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 11:39 AM
8

One of Thunderf00t's videos comes to mind and though he was only joking in that video, which was a satirical way of mocking feminism, he did mention a term called "male disposability". Though he was joking it does seem that some people do actually view the world from that perspective and only notice female suffering while ignoring equal, even greater actually, suffering of men, making men completely disposable in the process. Saying there's misogyny in a movie which dishes out to both sexes equa…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 10:18 AM
16

No. Odds are that no one at the bar would be able to say anything of significance. Do you pay attention to when random strangers leave a bar? If it's a club the odds are low. If it's a bar I can say from personal experience, with all my local bars in mind, that people would absolutely notice if a man was forcing himself on a woman as it was described and would probably kick him out already. The Lyft car driver would also notice if the women told the guy to go away and he didn't listen. The girls…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:21 PM
84

That's some half assed reporting, to be honest. What did the driver say, did the roommate corroborate the story? Don't just give a simple she said, he said recap, because if the case was dropped we can be certain neither the driver, nor the roommate, nor anyone at the bar for that matter gave the same account of the story as the accuser. And if that's the case, people have the right to know about it so that no doubt remains over the false accusation.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:22 PM
75

This is frightening. We all know how the police and the court would treat the guy if he didn't have any proof. As to why she's yelling these ridiculous statements (he's not letting me leave) and making such noise, my guess is that she's trying to make it sound like she was indeed attacked to every other tenant, who might have been within the earshot. That way she has plenty of witnesses who will support her account of the story. And we can see that both guys in the video already believe her and …
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:40 PM
12

Because it seems you have a different definition of the term, I'll just leave this here: Cuckold (ˈkʌkəld), [n], 1. a man whose wife has committed adultery, often regarded as an object of scorn
/r/MensRights20/12/15 05:06 PM
50

I wonder how the police would react if a certain gallery for example decided it's for men only and call them to kick a woman who visited it out, the only reason being that she's a woman. I'd like to see them handle that situation. I guess the answer would be: "you can't kick people out or deny them service just because of their sex, we have no jurisdiction here" coupled with nasty and judgemental looks at the owner of the gallery. For me a big problem with very real consequences in daily interac…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:55 PM
3

And how do you personally feel when other women label you a creep just because you're a man? This kind of segregation is one of the most bigoted things I've seen actually enforced in developed world. It basically says all men are potential rapists and harassers, so back to the bus with you lot. This is repeating the history, just with another oppressed group, men. Though I can't deny the hardship some women are going through, your gf included, in dealing with pervs and lunatics I'll never apolog…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:26 PM
58

Wait, you actually have "compartments" for women only? Is this an enforced rule, with the conductor having the right to throw you off, or a "suggestion"? It's bad even to suggest but you being kicked off for opposing it would be basically going back into the 50's.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:41 PM
2

Though replying to such lovely comments is counter-productive, if you're actually interested in reading a shorter article confirming she was not lying, then here you go.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:20 PM
1

And present it as a legitimate one, with a "shocking conclusion" of it actually being a false one in the end.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:16 PM
0

I think that the intention of this post was to point out how easy "we" throw away rape accusations by providing this unique example, which frankly can't be applied to many other real life cases. You also make a fair point and I do think the "underlying" message of this post and OP is probably to believe all the other accusations without anything else to go on, just their words in case this happens again. Basically extrapolating this one in a million case on every single other rape accusation, th…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:14 PM
-1

If you're doing this as a "social experiment" I can tell you it has little to no bearing. This wasn't an article but en e-book, very few people will take their time and actually read through. In this case, you're also posting in a subreddit on which legitimate false accusation are posted daily, with lives of many men actually being ruined even after they're completely absolved. So there is obviously going to be a confirmation bias in relation to similar stories which are intentionally misreprese…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:30 PM
16

I don't blame anyone for not reading this all the way through, but the fact here is that she was raped. She was apparently gaslighted by the police officers when she couldn't give a clear recap of the events. Edit: Well actually I do think it's ridiculous to jump to conclusions, at least skim through the story next time.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:06 PM
9

Police officers themselves could assume the standpoint of treating other criminals as victims too at the very least. No additional funding needed for that change in their behaviour.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 01:39 PM
30

Falsely accusing someone of rape is a crime. And while I don't necessarily oppose to providing psychological support to these individuals why are they pretending it isn't a crime? And when we're on the subject why aren't other criminals provided this support and viewed in this victim-hood light? Why don't they focus on providing help to other criminals instead of focusing on the crime they committed? I'm not sure if a man's mental state and motivation would have been questioned in an exonerating…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 01:22 PM
32

Not sure how I'd feel about this if this was their only product, but seeing how they also have a version that's targeted at girls, Girls are Weirdos but They Smell Pretty, that is nowhere near as offensive, it's obvious they don't afford the same kind of humour/treatment to all the groups so they don't deserve to use it on any group.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 06:17 PM
7

Oh, didn't think about that one, that's fairly likely too. But after OP linked another article which says that this wasn't her only offence of this nature, at least one was document of her video taping a woman, I think there are other explanations possible, like a personal fetish/thrill seeking or her selling these photos/videos online.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:06 PM
18

Not saying that she deserves more charges, not in the least, but I'm really not sure if a man who did the same thing would get only charges relating to unlawful "surveillance". My guess is that he'd get a few sexual assault charges thrown in the mix too. And as to people asking why she did it, the only a* reasonable explanation is that the man was so well endowed that she just had to share it with her friends. Even good looking women aren't immune to that kind of behaviour. The real question I'm…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:35 PM
45

And yet she's still considered as the victim by the court and the judge, while being presented as one by the media too: 'He did lead her to believe he would leave his wife and then live with her in Sri Lanka. That was a foolish dream. 'It was a demand for money so that she could be free. 'He had made threats to her family that he would make their lives difficult in Sri Lanka and Mrs Mendis was told she was: 'One of many women in his life' and was a 'prostitute'.' If she made up the rape allegati…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:12 PM
23

"It is so because I think and say so" that's a rock solid argument you got there lady, you're such a magnificent thinker. I love that your views are getting attention and are parroted by like-minded individuals and presented as facts. The school of feminist thought in action.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 12:21 AM
34

"I bought [the shorts] thinking they were pretty professional," she added. "They didn't show anything other than my legs, which I don't think is too provocative." Yes, very professional indeed. Not sure what's funnier here, her viewpoint on what's professional or that a news station actually decided they'll publish this story. The teen said she's fed up with dress codes that target women, and she's not the first to speak up about it — many young women have voiced concerns that school and work dr…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:20 AM
6

Any single standpoint that becomes socially unacceptable when you reverse the sexes/races/whatever is so bafflingly unjust that I simply can't imagine how people can be so dumb to actually fail to realize the apparent double standard. And I'm guessing this guy is some high ranking, high-paid employee. With that kind of incapability to recognize his biases and double standards we can only imagine how well he performs in other aspects of his job.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:06 AM
4

On that we agree, I don't like her methods either and the guy who's on* her right seems very uncomfortable. But if we're talking only about her personal opinion on what is beautiful and what she does to her body, then she can think whatever she wants. But yeah, things get questionable when people do such provocative things and force their opinions down other people's throats.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:29 PM
10

While I do agree with your reasoning and you having her health in mind, I think it's a bit totalitarian to enforce any kind of lifestyle on her as long as she's only hurting herself. Just out curiosity, what's your stance on smoking and drinking? Would you say the same to people doing that to damage their health?
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:05 PM
19

I don't have any problems with individuals having different standards of beauty than I have. And while media are over-reporting exclusively on better self-image focused solely on women, while ignoring that of men, she and anyone else for that matter can think anything is beautiful as much as they want. Though I don't exactly condone her exposing herself like that in the public.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:53 PM
82

I found the guy who posted this random image and added that description and I do have high suspicions he's a troll. Though it's really hard to know because most leading feminists could easily fall into that category too. Here's his tweet that gives it away the most: I'm not a moron. I spent 5 years at a liberal arts college AND I received an A+ in my sociology class. Top that. The image on the other hand is of Denise Jolly who took it during her "project" of accepting her body image as beautiful…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:30 PM
-1

Men and women are not very similar, at least not when it comes to being emotional, which goes hand in hand with the dating scene. If we look at the issue of finding the opposite sex attractive it's there because of the evolutionary aspect of spreading your genetic material. A single man can impregnate 100s of women, so he doesn't need to choose his partners wisely. If a more "suitable" partner comes along it's easy to switch to her. This might play a role in men finding women generally more attr…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:15 PM
8

Ah the internet, giving us global access to personal ramblings that would otherwise be trapped in the head of that individual or at least her diary. I hate a random (possibly made up) man that did random (possibly made up, or exaggerated) things I didn't like, therefore I can conclude that I justifiably hate all men. #FeministLogic
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:53 PM
-1

So... you agree that it is easier for women to be attractive... But you don't agree that people find women more attractive than men? Men are the group that finds women attractive, men are naturally more easily pleased. A woman doesn't need to be a beauty queen to please an average man. Women are the group that finds men attractive, they are the pickier sex with more standards and are less easily pleased. A man needs to be more attractive to please an average woman. There's a fundamental biologic…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:46 PM
-1

All baseless hypotheses that would need to be tested, before you could invalidate the OKCupid data, to be frank. I'm not trying to invalidate, nor do I have desire to do so, the data from OKCupid. I don't even know why they claim male attractiveness is underrated, because you didn't provide any links, so I can't even evaluate if I agree or not, all my arguments are extremely general. I'm just saying that even if their conclusions are completely legitimate, your extrapolation of those conclusions…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:18 PM
1

Some actually do get none (the ones described being highly likely to fall into this category), but those are definitely extremes and in general less is indeed more accurate than none, I agree with that.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:05 PM
-4

OKCupid is a dating service if I'm not mistaken, I think that it's conclusions are possibly a bit distorted by women valuing a man's financial/social status more than his appearance, but only when looking for a long-term relationship. Or they might be simply trying to appear less vain in their answers by claiming "I don't really care about looks", while the reality is a bit different. While men are more frank and admit looks do matter. That aside, I am speaking from my personal experience, boys …
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:27 PM
13

Yeah, I totally agree, there's a huge bias towards how women are treated on a daily basis when they fit certain social standards (which are indeed broader than with men). I'm talking about the very things she mentioned here like strangers giving up their seat to you, holding the door for you, treat women nicely, etc while even good looking men aren't afforded that kind of special treatment. But if we go into the more important (well at least for me) aspects of our social lives like making friend…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:51 PM
38

Here we were, a bunch of highly educated, well paid, successful women sitting in a theatre moaning about how women are being held back by sexism. Cue the irony klaxon. This is the most obvious counter-argument to the "women are oppressed and have limited options in life" theory that feminists repeat ad nauseam. Every single panel on how women are oppressed includes successful women, which are proof that if women make the right choices in the right circumstances (non-sex specific, rather their fi…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:06 PM
38

She raises great points about how the legal system punishes men more, how men are the majority of victims in almost all crimes and that there has been a push in STEM fields to a preference of* hiring women over men lately. But talking about the daily "social-interaction" benefits she's reaping now I think those mostly stem from her looks alone. She was an outsider man/boy (skinny, non-masculine) and now she's a fairly attractive woman who does reap benefits from her physical appearance. To go in…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:03 PM
8

Shared by the same person?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:58 PM
40

... and by prison inmates against other inmates to establish power hierarchies. If it's only done by men to women (which most certainly is very much implied in the first few sentences) then how can it be done in prisons? Those certainly aren't unisex and don't provide that scenario to possibly happen. I feel bad for you having to attend a class with such "quality" study material. And I doubt this is the only instance of this text-book minimizing men's problems.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:40 PM
3

Can't find any studies that are recent and take race/sex into consideration and compare conviction rates, that aren't behind a pay wall. Even older ones are. But speaking out of my arse, excuse the expression, I'd have to say it's highly likely that judges convict both males at higher conviction rates than females in these crimes, as they do black/hispanic offenders compared to white offenders. Taking that into consideration, white females are indeed more likely to not get convicted, especially …
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:31 PM
19

Yep, already said on a different post that I'll be keeping my eyes on this case to see if she was only smiling because she knew she'll be walking away from this and how far her daddy's influence reaches. All in all, my take on the reasons of her being released pre-trial are 5% white, 45% woman, 50% daughter of a high ranking official. And my money is on her not seeing prison from the inside, even though the odds in normal circumstances would be 200:1.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:09 AM
17

They have an already made excuse for this double standard (idiocy) and they have used it numerous times before. So pointing this out to a feminist will do no good. The "key", or so they see it, is the word "marginalised". Both women (the 3 billion minority) and Muslims are marginalised groups and they can indeed hate the privileged group that marginalises them because this hate has no "real power". While this isn't a two way street and men (preferably white) can't hate a whole group back, becaus…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:16 PM
11

How many female feminist comedians does it take to screw in a light-bulb? There aren't any.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:38 PM
3

I just got so sick of all of these dismissive little shit-pokes that feminism is coming up with to grab the attention of imbecilic teenage girls with, ... so I decided that we should come up with a dismissive little shit-pokes to grab the attention of imbecilic teenage boys with too. That is what you're saying here.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:18 PM
1

I really don't think there was a deeper meaning, designed to break stereotypes, to the hair dryer as the chosen house-hold item. Everyone uses it. Imo it was simply chosen as the "hackable item" because it gives more possibilities than any other house-hold item that comes to my mind atm. It creates heat, it creates air current and is small enough to be adapted to different scenarios. But if there was a message behind it, yours does make sense actually, even then I see nothing wrong with it for i…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:40 PM
10

Watched the video and nothing is even remotely offensive/sexist about it, it's actually pretty well made and interesting. Seeing sexism in every single thing is one of the most tiring aspects of the feminist movement. And great job bashing on people who are trying to do you a favour, hope they learn their lesson and start spending funds on people who'll actually appreciate it. Saying hair dryer is a "woman's thing" and bitching about using it as a promotional tool to get women involved in techno…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:10 PM
11

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/17/one-in-five-women-in-college-sexually-assaulted-an-update/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNsJ1DhqQ-s (Edit: just make the claims dr. Hoff Sommers made, if nothing else works for you) http://time.com/3633903/campus-rape-1-in-5-sexual-assault-setting-record-straight/ First link actually includes the recap of the study (I think that's the one), read it up and find your own arguments against it. First thing that I see and would want an…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 11:06 PM
10

Oh, I'm sure they have had at least one of those in the past, only to cover their arses of course. What I'd like to know is if they also ban women from those events.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:13 PM
0

Recidivism (/rɨˈsɪdɨvɪzəm/; from recidive and ism, from Latin recidīvus "recurring", from re- "back" and cedō "I fall") is the act of a person repeating an undesirable behavior after they had either experienced negative consequences of that behavior, or had been trained to extinguish that behavior. It is also used to refer to the percentage of former prisoners who are rearrested for a similar offense. That is the definition of repeat offending, if he hasn't been charged and sentenced for the sam…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:07 PM
1

No worries, was just curious because you raised a valid point. And I do agree that I too would probably pass a harsher judgement on an accused with priors, because of my personal biases, but that would make me a bad and unfair legal judge.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:22 PM
3

Frankly, I'm not familiar with US sentencing practices but I have a hard time understanding why priors would count even if they were totally unrelated offences. So my question is do they take anything in account, even absolutely unrelated offences, or do only similar offences matter? If he already had public lewdness offences, that would show the accused is likely to do it again, which would in turn justify a longer sentence. Him dealing drugs does not matter in this particular case, imho. If th…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:03 PM
6

Look, in no way will anyone defend what they did. But the way this was handled is ridiculous. The article doesn't even address the difference in the sentences, "he had priors, so it's K" is the only thing on that account. I would support them both getting the sentence she got. And the line the prosecutor gave: “We gave them a reasonable offer, what we felt was reasonable, and they decided it wasn’t something they wanted to accept responsibility for,” "Reasonable" is very subjective, you nitwit. …
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:54 PM
2

We can only hope your information is more accurate, because it being mandatory would indeed be a very bad joke. Even for feminist standards.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:00 PM
12

That's extremely bad news. Worse than any other coming from Australia, imo, and there were plenty of bad (insane) ones. Don't want to be overly dramatic, but this is simply put systematic brain-washing. The curriculum is pure garbage too, in the chapter "What about boys" they just had to take up space with the key-word privilege and it's explanation is about half the chapter. They'll probably "debate" the privilege boys have 80 minutes of the allocated 90 minutes.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:05 PM
16

Is this a mandatory class? From personal experience I can foresee a lot of frustrated boys coming from these lessons, no dialogue will be had, no questions will be answered, problems of boys and men will be minimised. Basically different views or opinions that aren't pro-feminist will be thrown out of the window, even regarding extremely subjective matters that vary greatly from individual to individual. I still have flashbacks to the high school literature teacher which I loathed. She didn't al…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:41 PM
3

In short Canadian men's only choice is to strap on a GoPro and keep it turned on 24/7. This really is disturbing and it does shine a light on a lot of weird cases I've seen coming from Canada, it makes sense now.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 11:09 PM
2

He's too young to realise the fight against men's centres, spaces, groups or simply support of any kind is not because of fear but because the feminists want to keep the sole control of that "social aspect" that is heavily funded, or donated to. Especially under the guise they have of "helping men" too and being "for equality", but they do so only when it suits their agenda, while still getting funds to do so. All in all, this whole campaigning against men's "anything" and shutting down the atte…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:54 PM
20

What can these MR organisations even do if the heads of charity organisations, or at least people that hold deciding power in them, are such obvious misandrists? "I decided your organisation is anti-feminist, won't support that claim with any data because I don't need to and I refuse to offer you what is readily extended to any feminist organisation, on the grounds of some bullshit guideline we put into effect to further our feminist agenda." I hope that he doesn't stop there and continues his i…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:40 PM
2

http://www.imdb.com/search/keyword?keywords=male-rape Edit: oh and this category is bound to be played as a joke more: http://www.imdb.com/search/keyword?keywords=non-statutory-female-on-male-rape Here, pick good examples from this list. Most dramas will probably portrait it as a serious offence, though some might not. I don't personally remember a single movie in which rape of a man was played as a joke, but almost every prison movie at leasts jokes about prison soap if it doesn't actually have…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 04:29 PM
1

I might have come off a bit more defensive, seeing how you were basically accusing me of unnecessarily bringing religion into this post/discussion, when the post itself is partly about religion. Implying it was brought up as an unrelated topic (making me the one that's ridiculous and "inferior" and other people superior because they don't derail the topic). It seemed a bit unfair to single me out given the circumstances. No hard feelings, just wanted to clear things up.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:50 PM
5

Why did you click on this post and watched the video then? It's clearly about religion. Just so you could get "angry about it" and appear morally superior? I mean, I get your sentiment, neither do I feel the need to bring religion into every discussion. But it is what was party discussed in this video and what at least some people feel the need to discuss even within this subreddit. I don't see why not, it's not like it's drowning in religion/atheism related posts. If it brings you such discomfo…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:32 PM
4

Oh boy, how did you misinterpret my comment in such a spectacular fashion. I am not generalising here and putting Thunderf00t and atheists (me included) in the same category as those on that panel... Those atheists on that panel exhibit personal tendencies to act on emotions and believe in something simply because they were told so, to belong to a group. A religious person of any mainstream religion and feminists have that in common, they refute any kind of evidence and act simply on their belie…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 02:23 PM
5

A bunch of people with a high tendency to blindly believe what they're told and defend those foundation beliefs no matter what (referring to that New Atheism panel in the video, because how they refer to themselves shows a high level of indoctrination into feminist thought)*. Feminism gave plenty of atheists (that panel included, Thunderf00t and any rational atheist excluded)* a cause for which they became deeply "religious". Edit: added explanations in the brackets, to avoid further confusion a…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 01:21 PM
1

It does, but not universally. Look, I understand the standpoint you're arguing from and I agree with it. The original comment was just a question as to how handling of young boys and girls in very specific relationships (no manipulation, no coercion, no extortion, no abusing of authoritative power over them, just consensual relationship that the teenagers enjoy) as if they were the victims of an extremely more sinister type of statutory rape (one involving actual mental abuse and forcing the kid…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 11:28 PM
1

Yes, some other, deeper issues on top of that. Having her daughter call said kid "dad" and actually expecting them all to have an adult relationship would be two of them. It went from falling in love with a possibly mature teenager (this doesn't make it right on her part, don't take it the wrong way), to some serious issues that point to a huge discord with how society works.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 11:15 PM
2

Thanks for understanding the point I was making, especially with first hand experience. From this article it really did seem like the boy actually enjoyed the relationship and from his point of view, it shouldn't have been a traumatic experience. If that was the case his sudden change of mind could only be caused by well-meaning but damaging counselling, imho. But reading additional info, I also got a feeling something was really off with that woman and we can only imagine what she did to him, m…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:33 PM
3

Thanks. And I do admit that's quite anti-climactic, I expected something more to come out of this when they mentioned a judge will take a look into the case. Disappointing that it was left at that.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:01 PM
2

The only gender specific data I was able to find was that 4166 patients had a vasectomy done. link That's the only specific number they have that quantifies men patients, but they do offer STI tests for both sexes (which make for half their services). If we're generous to the extreme and assume that services provided to both men and women are provided to them equally, 50:50 (which I doubt is the case and that those too are primarily used by women), the ratio between female and male patients is 4…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:30 PM
5

Oh boy, thanks for that info, neither of the articles that I read on the case mentioned that, that's some shoddy reporting. The third one that I found now mentioned she indeed became pregnant by him but terminated the pregnancy, though she does have a child from a previous relationship. She might indeed have been more of a lunatic and acted more abusively towards the boy than he previously realised and counselling brought it all out. In any case, it's hard to tell for sure what affected the boy …
/r/MensRights01/12/15 06:25 PM
9

I really dislike how they put lenient in quotation marks. It was lenient, no matter the circumstances. But something bothers me about this case, the boy describes this relationship as a normal one and his feelings as reciprocal, having been forced by his parents to end it. He said: "I just started by just going there talking, watching TV, chilling out. Then I started going four or five days a week." Asked if (he) had a 'crush' on the teaching assistant at first, he said: "At the time, yeah. She …
/r/MensRights01/12/15 06:08 PM
2

It is sad indeed, well it would be if she had no power or effect over other people. But she's apparently capable of trolling people to the level of them out-bursting and aiming insults at her (I don't doubt that he replied to one of her misandrist posts), because of which she can then have them fired because she has support of media and their employer not wanting any bad media. Then it turns from sad to infuriating. What's even sadder/more infuriating is that I think she found this guy to be att…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:17 PM
0

While I get that this might not seem as a MRM issue at first glance and that the guy did step out of bounds big time, especially because it was work-related therefore should have been handled professionally. And I do know that disagreeing with this article might seem like taking his side, but it's definitely not. If we take a step back and analyse this, we can assume that this guy possibly read a few body sings wrong, maybe he thought she liked him and he was dumb enough to think he'll come off …
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:02 PM
12

It's been almost half a year, any updates on what that judge they mentioned had to say on this case?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:51 PM
18

She's a misandrist, that much I can tell just from going on her social media for 30 seconds. That she is given a media platform to share her story, that she is congratulated for ruining, or at least highly damaging a life of a man that made a simple comment, that's just absurd. Is Australia really such a feminist country? A woman that has a choking Joffrey (from GoT) with a caption "Not all men", probably implying something incredibly twisted she wanted to regurgitate to her viewers should not b…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:01 AM
9

The image is making a claim to the point you're trying to tell me, which is not the claim feminists are making, because that'd just be irrational to be upset about. OK, I think we're all on the same page here, hopefully. You just misinterpreted what this post was about. This is a well known rational thinking feminist dr. H. Summers that makes fun of the many misinterpretations current mainstream feminism has. With this, she implied that if women made better career choices, there'd be no more wag…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:55 PM
27

You seem to have missed the point of the statistics regarding wages, in a spectacular manner no less. Statistics do show that there is indeed wage gap between sexes, no one is denying that and no one can argue it doesn't exist. It just doesn't mean what feminists want us to mean, what you repeated just now: that women make less for the SAME job. That's very far from the truth and already illegal. The fact that all wages men make and all wages women make are so different is because of choices peo…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:27 PM
1

What? That information really is a bit confusing. Not what I would've expected.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 09:44 PM
2

5 bucks on reverse roles being the first pitch with a man telling his girlfriend to get him beer. A funny way of show-casing the new voice commands, "if only your girlfriend was as cool as an Xbox", but it didn't go through too well either with the executives or the control group. Yet the ones in charge liked the pitch enough to swap the sexes and still go through with he ad. Losing appeal to the main demographic, but not enraging the sleeping dragon that is "anti-misogynist"/"anti-sexist" hive …
/r/MensRights29/11/15 09:19 PM
7

With circumcision you need to take into account that it's supported by people who take an absolute, almost exclusively religious stand on it. It's clearly the same in this article, a circumcised man projecting his views by quoting religious texts, there's nothing more to be said about it before completely dismissing it. There's really nothing to be gained by debating circumcision with people who practice it for religious reasons. But on to your point, you do raise a fair question here. I must ad…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 08:35 PM
5

Didn't know that, was referring to the fact that New Zealand was the first country to give women the voting rights. But having read this and a few other articles, it does indeed seem the country is not for equality, but for feminism. Saying otherwise was apparently a mistake on my part, thanks for correcting me.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:30 PM
-2

New Zealand really is a trailblazer in all things regarding equality of sexes. Hope the rest of the world follows suit.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:18 PM
22

So, biological fathers had absolutely no rights regarding their children and the only way they could donate sperm was if they gave them all away. Now that children would like to know who their fathers are, the rights fathers had are being thrown away, yet it seems they still can't contact their children if the children don't want that. That seems like an extremely raw deal for fathers any way you look at it.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 01:20 PM
3

Which answer do you find to be a good, concise one, though? The one where the reporter says "it's an issue we agree exists and should be studied, but we chose something else because it's catchier and appeals to us more"? Or the answer a random Redditor put forward which implies we already know what men die from, police killing and other violence, so no research needed? Neither answer really explains why the issue of violence against indigenous women is so important it needs addressing specifical…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 12:24 AM
3

And I am also grateful to every single man I saw this year who is usually clean shaven, or just random men in public, who are sporting a beard (no shave November) or a moustache in the month of November. This year I met plenty of bearded men with whom I exchanged this look, well it was on my part mostly, but still. I guess the movement is getting at least some traction.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:19 PM
77

Teacher gives some pretty specific "one on one girl talk" statements to a local paper. Among others this one stands out: “I always tell the boys, ‘You’re going to have a turn’ — and I’m like, ‘Yeah, when hell freezes over’ in my head,” she said. “I tell them, ‘You’ll have a turn’ because I don’t want them to feel bad.” It implies that she has a very warped view on her classroom equality and that she probably enforces it regularly. The school tries to put out fires caused by the teacher's stupidi…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:02 PM
3

Can you actually get shadowbanned from Reddit by a regular mod on an obscure subreddit? Or does that shadowban only take hold on that subreddit? In any case, yeah feminists don't take kindly to different opinions, you'll get bombarded for putting one toe out of line. But that doesn't stop feminists from coming to this subreddit and spewing their warped views here too. I guess you could call it karmic justice if they got banned from this subreddit too, but that's not what free speech is about. So…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:19 PM
1

When is the last time you called your friends to let them know you got home alright? When was the last time you called your friends after driving anywhere with your car, even to the mall, to let them know you survived the ride? There are plenty of car accidents daily, some of them cause deaths, do you think about those excessively too, do you and your friends wear helmets in cars? Why do you deem something a more important issue than the other, when the numbers are comparable? Rape is one of the…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:57 PM
17

This was quite an infuriating read actually. The whole article is riddled with links to other Telegraph "articles" that portrait him as the world's biggest idiot, mocking him, calling him naive: Calling this naive student a 'rapist' ain't helping anyone A mangina writes that he will rape George while wearing his face and the author doesn't outright condemn the guy issuing that threat, simply says "it's sad this has generated hate"... that's just wrong. And I would really like to know how serious…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:01 PM
6

I'm sure a professor whose career is summed up by keywords: "sociology of law, violence against women, feminism, criminal justice, gender, violence prevention, public policy, media" is very likely to present findings of such a "study" in an incredibly unbiased manner. But I guess a journal with an impact factor of 0.941 really can't be that picky. It's only sad that certain groups tend to gobble these "studies" up like they were holy scripts and additionally misinterpret already biased results a…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:00 AM
69

Not sure why, but these manginas are a pet Peeve of mine, sometimes even more so than the feminists. Ganging up on a single guy six on one in hopes of impressing women. Despicable. Instead of consent courses for men, I'd have these stupid PC morons watch this season of South Park to see what they act like in real life. Now that would be a proper learning experience that would indeed fill "a hole in curriculum", teaching them about the subject of self-awareness.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:29 AM
3

Seems like there's indeed a powerful lobby behind this discrimination, keeping laws like they are to suit their agenda. Because let's face it, national wide paternity claim shouldn't be a difficult right for fathers to achieve. And any adoptive family probably has all the support they can get from this particular adoption agencies lobby, when a father decides to go to court. In any case, thanks for linking this.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 03:36 PM
31

There are a lot of people in the world who would trade your slight risk of prostate cancer for their serious risk of being raped, being killed, starving to death, or dying of preventable diseases. Prostate cancer is a hallmark of privilege. Deal with it. I can overlook someone with a warped up view comparing and belittling certain health problem when they are compared to others, which he/she deems "more important". But I can't overlook extreme stupidity which implying that those listed other hea…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 03:30 PM
4

Accurately guess which State a woman will give birth in. Please don't tell me this means that a father that successfully registers as the father of the child in Florida for example has no legal right over that same child if the mother gave birth to him/her in the state of Utah. That would be just beyond twisted. In any case, thanks for providing us additional and frankly most crucial information. Sadly even reporters trying to shed light on the issue usually miss these most important pieces of i…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:26 PM
20

Reading this and some other articles describing this incomprehensibly discriminatory legal practice regarding unwed fathers, this is the most important part: Under Florida law, and that of other states, an unmarried father has no right to withhold consent for adoption unless he has registered with the state putative father registry before an adoption petition is filed. source Utah being a state that is especially notorious for women being able to take away all rights from the fathers, many of th…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 01:58 PM
47

This case is one of the more infuriating examples of grief caused by feminists. The levels of hypocrisy they exhibit really are baffling, the only coping mechanism is indeed to label their behaviour with a funny phrase such as crybullying, or better yet quantum superstate feminism, and find at least a bit of solace in humour, or you risk insanity. I mean how can one label some tweets mean and get so offended by them to see it is a just punishment to completely ruin the life of the person that tw…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:03 AM
1

That explains why your response might seem a bit over the top to us who only have this to go on. Oh well, let's hope she leaves you alone now.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:51 AM
1

I don't see anything that warranted such an angry response to her. I don't know if you two had a few falling outs before on the subreddit you both post to, but she does seems like a well intended, but misguided person. I have a hard time holding it against them, you can only point out this subreddit to her and hope she'll start putting one and one together and see men don't have it all that great as she seems to think. It's easy for feminists to blame their shortcomings in life on some boogeyman…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:47 AM
6

Feminism, seeking new recruits: only mental gymnasts need apply.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 08:43 PM
15

Worst thing about dishonest, falsely presented and misleading documentaries? People whose agenda it enforces will still treat it like a holy cow and use it's points as valid arguments. I can already predict an influx of infuriating articles which will cite this documentary as a religious text and a myriad of Tumblr posts treating it as such too.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:46 AM
16

Don't question yourself and what you did OP, you did well. Not many parents would have kept their cool like that. Were it me, I would have shoved her aside the second she decided to block my way and that'd be the single biggest mistake one could make in a situation like this. You should focus on that and congratulate yourself for not escalating the situation and not on what you could have done better. It's not hard to see that you love your daughters dearly, so don't let this incident prevent yo…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:28 AM
1

You two are a match made in heaven then, maybe you should contact her.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 11:44 PM
12

No, I don't believe things are harder or easier for an individual just because of his/her sex. Things are harder on an individual because she/he lacks finance, connections, or work motivation. The article that you linked explains absolutely nothing, it's just a metaphor trying to explain that "leg up" you were talking about by comparing it to a video game. A single opinion of a single man, without any data behind it. I'm as convinced by it, as I was by you saying there was discrimination. From m…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:58 PM
1

I don't think you'll understand it second time around, but here goes: a.) Writer says "jokes and humour are basically the only things worth living for" b.) Writer points to a "feminist killjoy" phone cases. Which is more than apparently a "fun" way of self-congratulating themselves on being such fighters against micro-aggressions people might have when having fun in short being feminist killjoys. Conclusion: Writer is a self-proclaimed comedian who ruins fun for everyone around her who isn't "PC…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:29 PM
12

Her problem? She's hanging around the crowd of wealthy, extremely good looking guys, who can have basically any woman they want. If they hear excessive whining, well if you have an option to upgrade (in their opinion) to another woman, well being a wealthy good-looking man, of course they have that option and of course they'll upgrade. She should give a regular guy a go. That being said, I can pretend to be that Baghdad guy she's searching for. Hopefully I won't sign any prenups, last long enoug…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 08:30 PM
35

It's always so very confusing reading random writings of an insanely privileged woman, who is telling the world how unprivileged women are. I would go with unintelligent, lacking self-awareness and logic to describe the writer of this article, but thick feminazi it is, if you so please. And you can chuck the "not me but an average woman" argument in the bin where it belongs. If you made it any woman can, there is no hidden gender agenda, just choices people make and connections they have. Go spo…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 05:27 PM
3

This being posted on IMD is the whole point, sadly. They wanted to "send a message" on how they feel about a men's day. And the number 4 is such an unfortunate unintended irony. Life would be a miserable puddle of cruel sadness if it weren't for a bit of humor. Lighten the mood with this phone case. Phone case says "feminist killjoy" which is the exact opposite of being humorous, probably bitching about innocent jokes people make and ruining the mood for everyone. Good job on your self-awareness…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 05:03 PM
2

Oh wow, you're getting shit talked because of that... that's just sad. Even if it wasn't satire, which it is quite apparently, I still wouldn't understand anyone getting offended over it. But that happens when people get away with "safe spacing" everything and successfully demanding censorship. Like people have said gather all the information you can and ask someone who has been in the same position in your uni before. Because if the people who hold the most power over this case have previously …
/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:51 PM
1

It's hard to evaluate your description and if satire was obvious enough for a normal user to recognize if we don't see it. If you don't feel good about sharing the whole description, I understand, but it's harder for us to advise. In any case from examples of what an average student who based his/hers whole identity around LGBT or feminist movements, safe spaces and trigger warnings it's safe to say that they will not accept satire regarding anything they deem offensive. Nor will they tolerate a…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:11 PM
2

The individual is always the one at blame. Agreed, but the blame should not lie with the individual alone. Because even if we deem the individual solely responsible for their actions in the end, you still can't expect to not have a higher number of young women with warped views on human relations if they were in fact subject to a certain type of propaganda ("if you had a few drinks, you were raped", "if you changed your mind, you were raped"). So, as is with crimes, feminist propaganda can be se…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 10:25 AM
1

There were two posts regarding this particular documentary that I read. I even searched for others as per your suggestion, though I'm not sure if you were serious, and didn't find any. Valid points were raised, it does explain away the violence of their main subjects in a manner that doesn't stand any kind of scrutiny and in concluding remarks extrapolates these excuses on women as a whole. But in no way was it misandric as your title suggests, not a single example of female on male violence was…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:50 AM
16

It's safe to blame this wide-spread of false accusations on the brainwashing girls and young women face from their feminist "educators". If they constantly hear about how absolutely every single interaction between a man and a woman can be interpreted as sexual assault or how every intercourse has the potential to be rape, it's no wonder we now have a generation of young women with victim-complex, who can twist a simple consensual act into a PTSD inducing event when egged on by peers and counsel…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 09:23 PM
1

Have you asked him why they let them on first already and what they were told? I think there's a difference if they say to the boys to explicitly "let the girls go first" or if they sugar coat it into being an act of "letting someone go ahead" which is labelled as a polite thing to do. Then they have them practice "being nice" by letting all the girls go first, not because they're boys and they are girls but because it's a nice thing to do to someone else in general. I don't want to sound insens…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:27 PM
-1

It's funny alright how such a special treatment, we could even call it sexism if we wanted, flies under the radar despite it being so blatant. Though I must say, this kind of behaviour could be more hurtful to the girls, making them think that the world owes them something and making them entitled (we can see that in the average feminist thought). While the effect it has on the boys depends on how it was worded and how they interpret it, they could think they're just doing it because it's nice t…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:04 PM
22

I like the quality of your nerves. I doubt many fathers would be able to keep their cool when faced with such obvious unmasked sexism. Especially after the person acting it out would react in such a way after being defeated with an argument. There's no winning with these "men are sexual predators" type of school workers, but you are making it a bit better for all dads in that particular school. Hopefully your words will inspire other fathers on here to stand up in a similar manner for themselves…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:51 PM
1

No problem, man. A lot of "arguments", online or otherwise, come from people misunderstanding each-other and semantics.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:01 AM
1

You're twisting my comment then. I wasn't generalising when saying I would prefer a man to be the one to rescue people. That part of the comment was based solely on the photo, from those 5 firemen in the photograph, men are all towering over the woman. That is no way to be misinterpreted as an insult to the lady in the picture, she probably also tried her damn best to become a firewoman and does a good job to. But when it comes down to strength she simply can't compete with the four men in the p…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:38 AM
1

17,6% (a very specific offence, within a broader statistical group) > 15% (broader all-inclusive term, within a specific group, that slightly overlaps with the first one). There are 2,6% more people reporting a specific offence, than there were people reporting an offence in the broadest term imaginable (the 25% statistic includes assault that was non-physical and is misleading at best). There is where the discord lies. What this is implying is that rape is more prevalent within the overall age …
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:06 AM
1

It's silly that I have to explain this in the easiest fashion imaginable, but here goes. Example: we have 16 candidates, 8 men, 8 women and they will fill 8 job positions. Because of the quota it'll be 4 men, 4 women in those positions. 4 out of these 8 women complete the test, so they all get the job. Only one the woman is completely equal to the men in all regards, she can carry the same weight, has the same endurance. While the other 3 of them passed the tests but are lagging behind the avera…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 09:27 AM
1

I don't know if you know how studies or statistics work and how to decide if they are credible or not, but these that are linked here are all very bad. The one that I had full access to, had 6/10 of questions answered only by girls, while the boys section was n/a. Some of the answers given by girls only were the highest statistic. You do realize how that effects the results, right? You still stand behind such a "good", "heavily cited" study? Link. Not to mention that almost all of these referenc…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 09:04 AM
1

If only more women were like you, we could have real equality in those work places.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:56 PM
1

Out of curiosity I watched the violent women one and it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. They were very apologetic towards the main violent women who were portrayed, though. But at least they pointed out that women get convicted significantly fewer times, which should be addressed in courts. And that that might change in the future, because judges won't see women as innocent any more, while more and more women will get convicted as a consequence. And their often repeated social experiment…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:45 PM
7

Save the "biggest victims of false rape accusations are women" comment, I was actually very pleasantly surprised with this panel. I hope more of these false accusations get covered in a similar manner.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:11 PM
7

These movies make confused as hell. I saw it as an actual portrayal of their real life projections on the word and blaming everything on patriarchy. This is what they actually look like in real life, no parody needed, just reverse the sexes. But I really doubt that's what they had in mind making it. Is this their way of devaluing international men's day, saying women are the ones actually needing it? Newsflash, you already have it. And I do hope these women realize this is exactly how feminists …
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:01 PM
3

I'm not sure I understand what you disagree with exactly. I also know of women who are not just capable of "beating me" with better technique but outright outperform me in any physical strength exercise, I know that perfectly well. But I must admit that thinking about it, I personally don't know any woman who would fit that criteria, so they are rare. And on top of that I'm your average Joe while firemen usually aren't, so women who would be capable of competing with them physically are even rar…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:43 PM
84

Call me a sexist, retarded, turd for brains nitwit all you want, but this is one of the rare cases where I would much rather see any of the men in the picture come and carry my passed out dead body weight out of a burning building, because I do not think the woman could do it. So no in this specific regard these men and that woman are not and never will be equal. What this recruitment quota means is that any woman who will apply and pass the tests will probably get the job, because there won't b…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 11:11 AM
2

To that I have no good answer I can honestly stand behind, it's a big risk indeed and I share your view. I just hope even people outside MRM would notice such an obvious double-standard. And together we might just have enough pull to stop their censorship, if it comes to it.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:01 AM
1

This can't be right. I apparently unsubscribed from there already so something fishy must have been happening before, though I don't remember it. Is there a function where we can inquire about why threads are being locked and why comments are being deleted, or is it a complete and utter power-tripping sort of authority mods have now? Edit: and what kind of bullshit answer is that men simply succeed more and that's that. While secretly implying women are still the disadvantaged sex because there …
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:01 PM
11

Mooney was given a two year prison sentence suspended for two years. So she wasn't given a prison sentence... and yeah this is how media and courts view female perpetrators if they fit a certain criteria, even the article is an apologetic piece saying how she had a sad childhood. Sadly we all know how the laws regarding rape/sexual assault are written in favour of women. Even if they did have sex, she could not have raped him. I even went and checked out the legal definition of rape in UK law an…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:17 PM
13

At least they have this rule for both sides of the coin, I hope they'll stick to enforcing them both. And no this can't be applied to some smaller subreddits, because they would have no front page left, including this one probably. And I especially hope /r/science will have this rule, btw, I have had some unpleasant experiences on there regarding bogus social studies in relation to all things feminism. It's a quite horribly biased subreddit (admittedly in my own biased opinion), not deserving of…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:07 PM
169

I'm already tired of this womyn card she keeps pulling out and it's only just begun. And yeah, no, it's not because of the mutual benefits and you supporting their interests down the line. It's because you both respect each other outside the political sphere. Gotcha. wink, wink
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:22 PM
217

"So when two drunk people have sex they are raping each other?" :') I'm sure you were banned because they were stumped and didn't have a ready made mental gymnastic that wouldn't seem too skewed in favour of one sex (guess which one), nor could they make one up on the spot. But yeah, going into such echo-chambers trying to break their circlejerks is not very productive, so no harm done by banning you. Sure the same could be said for this subreddit, but I never saw anyone banned for calmly arguin…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 09:13 PM
2

Feminism is largely responsible for introducing safe space into our cultural vernacular as a means of fostering open, productive dialogue. I'm not sure she knows the meaning of the word open. Open is the last word I would use to describe any debate within a "safe space." Open but not for everyone is an oxymoron. And tell me guys, the way I've been reading about the atmosphere on college campuses described in the past week as being racist on just about every step, is there even an inkling of trut…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 06:41 PM
1

You seriously questioning whether Jon Kay won this debate? In my opinion he did so in a spectacular fashion. How would a viewer not yet decided on this issue think, seeing how Kay was in a minority being ridiculed, I do not know. That is the point I was making. Sure, those 2 might strut around like they've won... but everyone watching knows they haven't. They look like idiots. You know so, because you have insight on MRA and it's motivation, I know so too. But I doubt they look like idiots to an…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:36 PM
14

"There is a move on university campuses to support younger men too, but it's controversial. Here's why." No controversies were mentioned just some idiots protesting it without any explanation. That's as stupid as saying "here's a weather report for tomorrow" and then showing a few cows grazing on a field for 3 minutes... In any case I applaud this man, he absolutely destroyed the three of them with his arguments. But you can't argue ideologues, one projects his views and spews blatant idiocy, wh…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:50 PM
1

Implying you need to be a feminist to give up traditional definitions of masculinity, great. As much as I hate to be that one who stoops to using ad hominems and playing a "wannabe" psychiatrist, but it seems to me he has (or had) some personal issues with his own "gender identity" and is only projecting from his personal "ordeal". He's seems like an individual who was trapped in a "man's world", playing college football and was hiding his real sexual orientation to fit in until some self-procla…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:26 PM
40

The fun part? She wasn't even convicted, but let of scot-free after a short evaluation in a psychiatry. And he was later put in jail after striking another woman (though it was a short stay, he was convicted). So I guess a woman can cut a man's penis off and receive less punishment than a man who strikes a woman. During the trial she made claims he was abusive, raped her, etc. The jury believed her and all the experts did too, describing this act as a temporary insanity caused by his treatment o…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:13 AM
11

Fuck that jury, seriously. I just watched the video there was no way that should have been interpreted as reaching for a weapon. "I feel relief right now, but it's going to take a little bit for me to get back to my normal self," she told reporters. "This has taken a toll on me that nobody understands." Yeah, sure let's throw you a self-pity party while the man you killed lies cold in the ground. Fuck. Edit: just watch the video in which the jury foreman explains the situation, the thought proce…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:27 PM
8

Lost good public image and credibility have no price, but I do hope they get at least some compensation for the defamation they suffered.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:16 PM
3

I would love if he asked her is she also considers herself an MRA, she apparently does still identify as a feminist. Not sure why she wouldn't want to disclose that information, but it's her call. Any segments that stood out? Sadly, I don't have the time to watch the whole 2 hours.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:47 PM
20

This kind of campaigning is blood-boiling. Sure Malala has plenty of reasons to be a feminist, so do all the women in 3rd world countries. It's not even a gendered issue, all people in 3rd world countries need a shit ton of extra rights and life opportunities. Most of the issues they face aren't gender exclusive, while some are affecting only boys and men. That's just how shitty they all have it. Edit: Disclaimer; if we take religion out of the picture But Watson needs to stop falsely equivalenc…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:56 PM
68

I'm sorry man, I really am. I hope that letting go of those ghosts and telling it like it is to your mother will help you in moving on. I have to say not all women are like your mother, though every relationship has a possibility to end in that way in addition to the odds being stacked against you financially and legally when it does. But you should give having a girlfriend a try if that's what you want, usually you can tell by how they behave and what views they have if they are capable of doin…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:44 AM
2

In every group there's bound to be people who take their beliefs to extreme and become ideologues, not even wanting to have a rational debate. It's the same in MRA, but I have to say, it is not nearly as bad as in feminism. Mostly the topics I see on here are related to legal (or legally related) disadvantages men face, all easily quantifiable by peer reviewed studies and real life examples. People who join this group can be critical thinking individuals who have taken their time and looked into…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:41 AM
14

Funnily, all self-proclaimed feminists (edit: that I personally know IRL), neither extremist nor man-hating just regular women who identify as such, also hold this view that man should pay "for at least the first few dates". They can list and vilify many other social expectations, some less trivial than others, that are not in their favour, but seem to be perfectly fine with the ones that are. PS: I seem to have come to the show a bit late, so if there were some funny examples she listed, feel f…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:15 PM
13

My guess is that they will be portrayed in good light, special snowflakes "fighting against oppression from societal roles and expectations." And at least one time the reporter will chuckle when one of them will explain how their boyfriend deserved it and how she was actually the real victim.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:58 PM
2

If that is the case she managed to only get 109 upvotes in all her answers. Seeing how there are 19 of them, she had about roughly 5 supporters (probably her research team) that upvoted every single answer. I know it's a huge assumption, but I'll stick to it. This actually makes me feel better about the whole fiasco.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:48 PM
1

That's a solid argument, which really* could apply to some people having difficulties deciding the intent of the article. I personally didn't take the fact that it was posted by The Guardian into consideration, but I can see how someone could actually question the real meaning behind it keeping in mind their track record.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:48 PM
29

Not sure why it's even needed to be said, but this is "satire" (well at least her warped up attempt at it). She's mocking the perceived societal standard that man shouldn't cry, let's just get that one out of the way. She's not actually mocking men who cry. But then on the other hand, it's only feminists who seem that the society has some warped standards on men who cry, probably just projecting their own experiences of being told not to show her emotion so publicly because people don't want to …
/r/MensRights08/11/15 12:45 PM
2

Can someone with first-hand experience (in any country) describe to me what such a charge costs you, if you get conditionally-discharged in the end? How much money gets spent for attorneys, how much for court fees if there are any and if such a conditional discharge can, or has cost you your job and if it can negatively affect your job-hunting? In this case on the surface, it seems that he didn't suffer any other punishment than the £400 that he has to pay to the ex and the conditions he has to …
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:52 AM
13

No real discrimination took place, though. Only one bigot trying to monger fear and epically failing at that. The man got the job, the bigot was terminated as a friend and the comment section is overwhelmingly on the man's side. This was actually quite pleasant to read, so thanks for linking it.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 09:03 AM
10

Let's make a check list: a.) a woman, check b.) good looking, check c.) wealthy, check Sentence will be extremely lenient, something along the lines of "the defendant feels great remorse for the incident and remained on the scene of the crash, yadda, yadda, yadda. No jail time." We've seen it a hundred times over.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 01:16 AM
9

I guess that if they used any credible statistic they'd fill that room to the fullest and it certainly wouldn't look as good. So they at least have a valid, aesthetic reason to cherry pick their sources. And after all who cares if truth gets lost somewhere in the message, as long as it's a catchy one.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:52 PM
7

Even if you argued like the most intelligent person that ever lived, you would not have convinced this ideologue. But I still prefer him over plenty of other self-proclaimed feminists just because of his "I don't want to force you, you have a right to not like feminism" mentality.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:35 AM
110

Man divorces wife, gets his children taken away for punishment, can only see them on weekends if lucky. Woman stabs and kills husband, she needs to be let out early so she can take care of the children. To hell with this legal system and these biased judges who couldn't even do a proper job as a cashier at Walmart and yet they are still entrusted with serious decision making.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:45 PM
4

Thanks, I got to this site now and it's much more clear what his mo is. His Twitter was way more ambiguous because of the bad sarcasm. I really couldn't tell if he was serious or sarcastic without knowing what he's supposed to be peddling. Edit: so yeah, an anti-MRM (feminist, if you need to label that too), who mines for and misrepresents out-of context quotes would be my description of him so far.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:33 PM
2

I guess I am not in the "gender debate" then. And yeah, had a feeling that was the case, but his sarcasm needs some work.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:10 PM
17

How do they know "who" the backers are? Is there a "what do you identify as: a.) feminist b.) MRA c.) neither" questionnaire when supporting through Kickstarter? But knowing the nature of both radical feminists and MRAs it was to be expected that she will receive backlash. Luckily, these accusations really are extremely mild, imho, but I do not know how she feels about them. And admittedly mixing the festivals thinking she won the Cannes film festival award is probably a mistake many of us did, …
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:49 PM
1

Maybe she did use a fax-machine after all... /s
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:07 PM
2

"I'll show people that I drink beer, so that they'll know I'm cool like that." That tells me a lot about this person. Not to mention his starting of the reasoning with "I would guess" and then firmly standing behind those "guesses" and building his arguments on them like they're scientifically proven universal truths. All said and done, it's just another biased person with a personality akin to a religious person, latching on to everything feminism teaches as it is the word of a higher power and…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 10:07 PM
3

even a footnote linking to an author’s local hard drive. And here I was, terribly ashamed if I even misspelled a single word in any of my projects/works. I guess I should start writing reports for UN and throw those worries away.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:35 PM
2

Because I have zero first hand information on this project. Trusting myself over someone who apparently does have said information and has in the past proven to be reliable on his MRM views would be unwise.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:46 PM
3

The real double standards and most important one will come when we'll find out if the charges (assaulting an officer) against her will stick in court. If I were stupid enough to do that, I'd rather be tackled and beaten up, but having the charges against me dropped afterwards. And yeah, this woman is an idiot, she did it for shits and giggles apparently. Here is all the context there is to it.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:42 PM
1

Indeed, all these listed points aside, the biggest one I personally have to go on in believing her intent is genuine is Milo backing her up and risking his own reputation in doing so. He probably knows how the finished work will look like, or how it'll be presented and he agrees with it to the point of risking his own readership and calling for support.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:33 PM
1

Sorry man, but it seems you've become smitten by her, which in turned made you think everything she does is magic. I mean I guess that most of the points you listed can be verified but saying: "I got an offer of a million dollars and turned it down because of my integrity" seems quite far-fetched to me. All we can do now is wait and see, the documentary got funded and it will see the light of day. I'm glad it did, because I too admit that she seems like a decent person, without a hidden agenda. …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:34 PM
13

That was just painful to read, someone is having a mid-life crisis and wants everything to go their way, creating a paradox of having the cake and eating it too in the process. I couldn't remain in a relationship with an entitled, self-centred and egoistic person like the one that's been described here. I hope the guy won't stick around for too long if she doesn't change, it's just not worth it in the end, not even for the kids. Edit: but I am glad that most best rated comments were on his side.…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:03 PM
9

My first prediction came true, now let's see if my second will to, that one being that she'll decide to sue the country for causing her unjust psychological harm. After all she has enough other things to deal with being an "ethnic" woman in a white man's world and these charges were just uncalled for. /s And on a more serious notice, has anyone else ever been exempt from his/hers online hate speech, because they were not operating with fax-machines? This has got to be one of the most retarded th…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:16 PM
3

Excellent, didn't know about this. Definitely going to use it from now on. Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 11:32 PM
14

I feel remorse every time I click on such a shitty article, witch such shitty and biased TV anchors, which glorifies shitty women for doing shitty stuff, because what I'm really doing is generating views for them. And they'll keep on being shitty if they'll keep getting views. Sure the guy is a douche for his speech that was mentioned, but that has absolutely nothing to with debating international men's day in parliament. And the amount of contempt in her expression when he's listing the men's i…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 11:06 PM
3

No, no. Lose the "only" and replace it with potentially marrying up, if chance makes it so. My, personal primary question when finding a partner is not how much she makes, but other more important factors. And I do not speak on behalf of men on Reddit in general, nor for all the users of this subreddit. I just haven't came across any sentiment of looking down upon being in a relationship with a woman that out-earns you in this particular subreddit, that's all that I am saying.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:28 PM
2

It's not a theory, it's more of a pessimistic state of mind, with a little bit of personal logic attached, not supported by any peer reviewed research on feminist movement in video games. But let's be honest, many other walks of life exhibit worse sexism than most video games. But most established feminists don't give a rat's arse about it, because there's not enough money to be made petitioning for change there. They like-wise don't attack some small games which are inherently more sexist and g…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:23 PM
6

You've been hanging in the wrong crowd. No one on here would scold you for having a partner that makes more than you. If I could be a house man, be supported by a woman, while doing the house work and doing my hobbies all day, I would do so gladly. Wouldn't give a rat's arse what other people think about it. And the wage gap IS a myth, women DO get paid the same for the same work already. So your fight is already over, grab a cold one, run around the world and relax.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:15 PM
8

Firstly, you need to know that feminists talk about perceived sexism in games and want to butt in "into gaming industry" because it's a big one in which there's a lot of money circulating from already established supply/demand. They only do this kind of butting in out of financial reasons. That's why they choose a big industry in which they think they will get enough traction and support from other people, or get funded by big companies (gaming journalist sites, bigger developers, simple donatio…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:54 PM
15

Wanted to inquire about some examples of hatred of men in these books (not having read any myself), but this dunce of a reporter included one already and described it as "one of the best opening lines of any non-fiction work". “Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and …
/r/MensRights02/11/15 04:42 PM
2

You have a great point, only people who know who Red Pillers are and what they stand for will make that connection, while the others will make a connection with Matrix. And the metaphorical taking of the red pill, as in the Matrix, by the film maker while seeking the truth about men's issues and anti-feminism is indeed quite symbolic. I just hope people without any background won't search for Red Pill after seeing the documentary, stumble upon their subreddit and think that's what MRM is about. …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:44 PM
20

Sadly, no. From my experience RP is almost exclusively about self-image, dating and social problems. Those are all subjective to the highest degree, I don't like discussing those subjects as universal truths. It's more of a self-help program than anything else, which is great for men to have, come together and share their problems. Even if they do also fight for legal rights, it's more of a lifestyle than anything else, which I have a feeling tries to exclude women. While MRM on the other hand d…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:53 PM
24

The only critique, or better yet credible concern, that I've seen about this documentary is that Red Pill ain't exactly Men's Rights movement. So I'm really in the dark about anyone actively trying to ruin this project.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:26 PM
234

If this article titled "Feminists are Trying To Shut Down A Documentary on Mens Rights" would actually talk about how feminists are trying to shut it down, that'd be great... I get it, it might be an excellent, not to mention highly needed documentary, but at least give us an example or two of how feminists are trying to censor it if you're writing an article about it.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:12 PM
6

In other words Bernie found out, even later than expected imho, that ad hominem fallacy is one of the favourite tools in a feminist's weak argumentation process. They also tend to use every other cheap trick in the bag.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 09:54 PM
7

That "he assaulted me" line she gave the emergency call centre over the phone made my blood boil. What a stupid, deceitful individual. She knew she fucked up, so she made it up that he assaulted her.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 09:42 PM
2

If your thoughts wander to such "dark places", it's hard for me to imagine you're in a really happy relationship, but I'll still take your word for it. I think that the only part of the "combined wealth" that is divided by these laws after a long term non-marriage relationship falls apart is that which you can not prove was brought by you into the relationship. So if for instance you're the primary bread earner, buy the house/apartment yourself, maintain the house yourself, etc and you can prove…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 04:50 PM
1

That funding site reads as if the woman wrote it and only used the husbands name to get more funds as he's the innocent bystander here, to get more sympathy. I'm really saddened to hear that he whole-heartedly believes her side of the story and parrots it the video. I do feel bad for him, but if he'd only inform himself and take a better stand on this issue, consequentially make better videos, the people would leave his company alone. Probable delete some of those reviews too.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 02:32 PM
31

If that actually happened: "Today in news: Men cover up a Florida woman after she starts dancing on a bar." Jennifer: "These men are such disgusting fat-shamers. If the woman was fit they would probably cheer her on. They should be arrested for what they did." TL/DR: damned if you do, damned if you don't.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 02:22 PM
5

It is a man's issue, two of them. Firstly Thunderfoot who was defamed in this video, he had no part in her data being leaked, she did that to herself. He only showed how she shot herself in the foot to support his argument when she tried to have his videos removed from Youtube. He showed her showing her data after the negative reviews already came in, I'm not sure how this "news report" managed to portrait that so badly. It's a shame they did such a one sided report, this won't help anyone. I th…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:01 AM
2

We should also pay the reserve team player for a third league football club the same as we pay Messi. That will teach us a great deal about equality.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:06 PM
8

I have no problem with the tea analogy, I'm not really sure how many people need to hear it though. Because what percentage of the population is not innately aware of these simple facts? And is it really justifiable to force it down our throats at every opportunity and label us all rapists.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 07:04 PM
14

And here's a short video coverage from this "protest". I really respect those men for not retaliating, well at least from what I've seen in the video. I don't think I could have peacefully handled such primitive, monkey like, shit throwing behaviour. But I think that this wasn't a protest against "sexism", it was a "protest" (riot, more likely) against religion. But I wouldn't be surprised if it really was organised by a feminist group. Because that's all I see there, crazy women.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:24 PM
5

About this incident, prior to his response she attacked him personally and his political views. In his response he did not get personal, but addressed the issue. And shortly after there was another passionate candidate opposing him, to whom he replied: "But here is the point, we can raise our voices, but I come from a rural state. The view on gun control is different there. We must come together." Guess what, the person he also "accused" of raising his voice was a man. So by Clinton's logic Sand…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:38 PM
-2

Well, it's a personal thing to me, so I can't list any good reasons why I would prefer my co-workers not to know, I simply feel that way and know others don't. All I can give you is a metaphor in saying that there is no real downside to people knowing your penis size, but you'd still rather it remained only known to you. I'm not strictly against it and probably wouldn't fight to keep my salary a secret, if my company decided to publish it too, but I still wouldn't feel too good about it.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:12 PM
19

And I completely agree with your point, but if your (or any sane person's) reasoning would be correct then the "wage-gap myth" would have been debunked the first time anyone brought it up. Because the data they are asking for is already known (well mostly), the laws are already there, everything that points against the myth is already known and it didn't help so far. But we can still hope and I personally welcome this idea, I just don't think it'll do anything to discourage the wage-gap advocate…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 02:49 PM
52

You have a prime example here, no need for twisting. They'll just take the IT department OP presented and say the women earn less for "comparable jobs". Then leave out the "non-important factors" like education, experience, dedication to work and time-off. In general, the only numbers they will present to media or focus on will be the ones that are in their agenda's advantage (or women salary disadvantage). The rest they'll make up some excuses for or say that women do earn more in some cases, b…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 01:50 PM
6

I personally wouldn't want my salary be known to all my co-workers, was this anonymous (save the sex, education and position) or was it full disclosure, names included? And yeah, I'm sick and tired of this wage-gap myth. It's been debunked so many times, it's almost like debating the existence of a deity with a religious person. And some people, feminists, will simply choose to believe the "wage gap" exists (the way they explain it) for all eternity to come. So let's move on and stop giving them…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 01:37 PM
11

They have so many ways to set the tone of the article. For example I can't remember ever reading an article on female paedophiles in which they used the word "child" to describe the victim, it's always simply "a boy", or even a "teenager". Boys apparently aren't children. And not to mention that all recent female paedophile examples also included grooming (messages, etc.) and not once did I see it mentioned as a circumstance of legal importance, making them deserve jail time even more so. I gues…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 10:11 PM
281

"In news today, a biased woman remains biased and continues with her double standards, while trying to maintain a façade of equality and compassion towards men."
/r/MensRights24/10/15 12:26 PM
9

Just out of morbid curiosity, does anyone have any links he could provide for at least a short description of what this "consent class" includes as study material? If there is a uni/college that put the whole course worth of slides online, free for anyone to see, that'd be even better. Because I really don't know what they could talk about to fill a whole class worth of study material. Or is this just a few hours of a quick course? And I guess it's not just these classes but the whole feminist m…
/r/MensRights23/10/15 10:04 PM
2

Confusing is the word I would use to sum up and describe this. If /u/tonysobrando is right and the first few seconds were what got them so pissed, then this is retarded. He was simply filming two "actresses" doing what they probably naturally do when going out (it really seemed like a normal night out). I would wager that a few drinks in that woman, who wants so be offended no matter what, acts similarly when she has a good time drinking out. But that bickering between the two guys, the edits, e…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 03:00 PM
7

I don't agree completely, I've read articles before about false accusations that portrayed men in similar positive fashion if they too were the victims of people with such vivid imaginations. We all know already that the police procedures and laws are ridiculous in these cases, but I am surprised that her town's lynch mob mentality showed this woman no mercy just because of her sex. I guess "simple-minded" (or better yet, dumb) people jump at any opportunity to pull out and sharpen their pitchfo…
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:57 AM
1

For now, Mr. Anderson will remain on the sex offender registry in Indiana, where he lives. For now he is on the list, so it's not wrong. His lawyer will have to challenge that.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:58 AM
22

So if I'm reading this correctly, he's only allowed to use internet for anything that is school related work? How long does this "ban" last? They basically know she lied and he still has to live like a hermit and be on his state's sex offender registry? This can only be classified as a "win" compared to his first sentencing. It still remains ridiculous otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:16 PM
3

I agree with you, but some people have harder time wrapping their heads around this idea. If it'd be OK for them personally to have sex with their hot teacher, then it absolutely must be the same for everyone else and they have difficulties understanding how others would think differently. Can't say with complete certainty that's true, but this could explain what/how these idiots are thinking when writing those stupid comments and dismissing the severity of the crime. Edit: oh and they don't eve…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:48 PM
1

They only look at one side of the equation and think how they would have felt in the situation if they were the boy and conclude that "it'd feel great". Well at least I hope that's the case and they're not all paedophiles. And if I'm completely honest I wouldn't mind having "an affair" with some of my teachers when I was young. But that's the most trivial side of these story here. Even if the boy liked it all, the teacher is the one having sex with a minor (10-yo even, for crying out loud). She …
/r/MensRights19/10/15 01:16 PM
6

I really hope she's not good-looking (if they'll even allow for her to be named publicly), because we'll only hear "nice" and "what a lucky boy" comments thrown around.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:49 AM
11

So, it's been almost 6 years and a half since this article was posted. Are these facilities unisex by now or did the feminist claim another victory in the name of "equality" and kept these refuges women's only?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:36 PM
6

Can you give us an example of what she said that you found to be hate speech? Because the top reviews are either delusional or her friends to miss the hate speech in there and praise it. Edit: though the title "Misandry hour" is indeed self-explanatory of what content a person can find in there.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:43 AM
11

I agree with the guy, any time I tried having a rational discussion with a feminist on the crazy spectrum (sadly they appear to be the majority from my experience also, as biased as it might be) they never ever wanted to even think about the point you're making or give a second thought to the arguments you present, as valid and real as they might be. They just want to force their opinion on others without giving you an inch. It's an ideology with followers that have personalities and behaviour i…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:15 PM
5

Helping more women into the workplace - by offering flexible working and support with childcare - would also generate huge economic benefits for the country. That's a delusional point that doesn't work in profit oriented businesses, I find it quite funny indeed. Our schools and universities would not only keep girls on the path to academic success, but play a significant role in challenging gender stereotypes - not least on the subjects they take - and in shaping the values and attitudes of all …
/r/MensRights12/10/15 11:38 AM
2

Ah well, at least they didn't say women are paid less for the same job. Just look at this this way, it's just another way a few individuals thought would help them earn some money. They created a "party/group" and are hoping like-minded, or better yet with the same agenda, companies and people will donate to them. In the end it's all about the money.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 11:25 AM
2

Just your run-of-the-mill feminist mental gymnastic. Anyone giving this "thought excrement" any credence at all will not listen to reason and counter arguments. They have their minds made up and you can't convince an ideologue of anything not fitting into their narrow scope of reality.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 04:11 PM
4

I'm getting a bad feeling that she didn't say anything to the guy in person and had to "vent" about it later on her FB, even more so because she was mad about herself not speaking out. I don't agree with what the man said, but to blow it out of proportions like this is as much of a damaging behaviour example to the little girl as what that guy said/did. Because being a drama queen is also not a really desirable trait for a person to have. But then again, I kind of see why the mother did all this…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:41 PM
10

Does anyone know what happens to these feminists that just want to ruin people's lives? I'm absolutely sure they were reported to the authorities before, what did they do about it? This is disgusting. I'd like to think I wouldn't give a fuck about what people thought about me, but I really don't know. I think that regardless what we think, such treatment would ruin just about anyone who doesn't get a platform to express his feeling and bottles everything up.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:30 PM
1

Wait, are they implying the woman got raped or the man? How can they even say to someone that he/she got raped, it's for them to decide if they wanted it or not. Sure they can suspend the fraternity for alcohol and hazing, but this was not rape. Unless the man says he was forced to do so, then he was indeed sexually assaulted/"raped". Edit: and if anyone is implying the woman got raped, they're a certified moron.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:02 PM
3

I gotta say Shoeonhead seemed much more reasonable on her videos, which I loved, where she's flying solo, but it seems that the "pack mentality" has a bad influence on her. They practically had a "who's cooler" contest by making fun out of other people, not with arguments but personal attacks. Don't know who the dude is, but that horseshoe metaphor was quite off. They had their "personal definitions" of feminists and MRAs in mind when they talked about it. They extrapolated the most radical femi…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 06:58 PM
13

Only noticed this wasn't a /r/TheOnion content after realising feminist mental gymnastics were involved. And yeah, we've seen it all from them, this ridiculousness sadly doesn't surprise me any more, seeing which "camp" it comes from.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 03:04 PM
7

Did they really simply take percentage of jailed female TV licence fee evaders and divided it by the percentage of overall female prison population? And concluded from that that they are "6 times more likely to be sent to prison"? Oh, the stupidity... I just hope that the feminists won't gobble this up and use it as yet another rallying point for their agenda and utterly fail to realise it's another crystal clear example of a fallacy.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:22 PM
2

Great, now the dead woman* nr.3 will have greater legal rights to sue the 20th Century Fox for paying Hugh Jackman more than they paid her* for appearing in X-Men: Days of Future Past. But I too think only people profiting from this will be the lawyers, regardless of their sex. Edit: I also just realised, what if a women is earning more than another woman at the same company for the same work? Does this law still apply if the sexes are not different, or, as other already asked, reversed?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 09:16 PM
3

"Kill all men" is not difficult to label as and definitely is hate speech. Don't generalise and wash down this slogan's importance because of other less distinct examples of hate speech.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:02 PM
4

I'm all for free speech, but hate speech is another matter. Kill all men falls into the latter category.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:29 PM
5

I'm glad that she's facing these charges, but before we get too happy about it all let's wait and see if any of them sticks. Or better yet, let's wait and see for how much she'll sue the country, for causing her unjust emotional trauma, after she's acquitted. And given the track record, she has high chances of winning that lawsuit.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 04:12 PM
3

I've been in the same spot, though luckily not yet professionally. And every time I try to bring some facts into the discussion of this fallacy I instantly get disapproving looks, people don't even listen to what I have to say and yeah they just come back with insults of sexism. The hivemind circlejerk can be very strong when discussing this topic in certain settings and it's disheartening to say the very least.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:18 PM
1

It's not a statue, but we're getting there, I like it. Thanks for sharing. :)
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:12 PM
4

I was flabbergasted to see a talk show on which the gender and race wage gaps were discussed. Feminists and the host claimed women earn less for the same job and Thomas Sowell presented evidence that that just isn't the case and made all the same arguments you see repeated today. It's surreal, I felt like I was watching a 2015 video. Here's the Youtube link.* So this has been going on since at least the 70's (that's the only date stated in this Youtube video, but it could be wrong) and I really …
/r/MensRights05/10/15 09:08 PM
12

The wage gap, oh how I dislike debating it with anyone. Even the statement "the "wage gap" is a myth" can be rightfully classified as a lie when arguing semantics, because there is an overall wage gap. It just doesn't mean what feminists want people to believe it means. I had arguments with friends about the wage gap that got heated when they claimed it existed and I claimed that it didn't. Only after a rather too long period of time we realised that what that friend was arguing for was that "co…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:35 PM
11

Seeing how popular or well received this person, who is also a woman, is compared to Ronda, how would you rate those factors in terms of importance? I agree with you, it helped Rousey out, probably significantly, that she was a woman in a male dominated world sport so she stood out even more. But my opinion is that her personality and abilities played a far greater role, seeing how there are plenty of other women in UFC and none is getting even close to as much attention. But I must admit that I…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 03:25 PM
64

Rousey is getting so much attention not because she's a woman, but because she's a person with a likeable personality, who is a good fighter who happens to be a woman, which is a quite rare combination. Julianna more than apparently lacks the most important factor on that list, a likeable personality. So she can only dream about getting paid more if she's going to continue with similar, delusional public statements, riddled with personal bias and, frankly, stupidity.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 03:09 PM
7

She also has a loyal (mainly male but almost cult like) following. You know that a person lacks any kind of introspection when it's a feminist accusing other groups/people of having a cult like following... The only "cult like following" I've seen in the gender related issues is the feminist one. When opposed and asked for "non-feminist" data to back their claims up, they scream patriarchy or oppression and censor the debate. That's the cult mentality right there. While on the other hand MRAs ha…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 09:50 AM
2

The protest that happened before this lecture makes me more and more afraid for the mental well-being of frankly quite a lot of young people. Saying or implying that this speaker, Cathy Young, and everyone else involved are rape apologists should have been taken as a serious offence and not just shrugged off. This kind of delusional hate speech these radical feminists are spewing all around shouldn't be taken so lightly. Sorry for derailing the topic, but it got on my nerves.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 11:22 PM
66

I expected something hugely different, was positively surprised. They summed it up nicely, nothing much left to say. And really, the most prevalent response to this issue is the most superficial one "gun control" and further vilification. Yeah, let's not try tackling this issue by being nicer to these individuals, just take the guns away and continue kicking them. They won't be able to wreak enough havoc this way when they break. Only when there's men involved there doesn't need to be a politica…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:27 PM
17

I haven't seen any anti-women mentality on this subreddit that was even nearly as toxic as the anti-men mentality I've seen on basically any feminist platform. So I don't think you'll get down-voted at all. Censoring anything they even remotely don't like is the feminist modus operandi though. So you will not get anything that goes against their narrative posted on their subreddit. You could post that article on this subreddit, as it does have an effect on men too. As for your other question, if…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:28 AM
3

A woman who has never been attacked/harassed before in her life, though she claims she's been a reporter for a while now, almost starts crying because she is somehow still afraid that she will be harassed, though that seems against all odds according to her experience. Then she proceeds to ask for braveness, from these speakers she proclaims incredibly brave... This individual should be on medication if she isn't already. There is something fundamentally wrong with her. How can one expect someth…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:28 PM
1

Two strangers at a random bar: "Oh, you're John Smith aren't you? I saw that you have a 5-star rating and that you once saved a child from drowning, so I just have to ask, do you want to have a drink or two?" "Sure, why not." "Wait, there's been an update... YOU EAT CEREAL WITH WATER?! YOU MONSTER! I'm out of here." I imagine a lot of similar superficial stuff coming from this "app".
/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:08 AM
-4

I've personally noticed a discrepancy between the quality of male and female characters in many movies. I'm speaking from anecdotal experience, because I have nothing else to cite than feminist biased propaganda that additionally skew these facts and I don't agree with at all. Just imagine how many strong male leads you can name and then do the same for females, or how many men are there just to be an eye candy, or how many women. That discrepancy can be interpreted as sexism and enforcing of st…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:10 PM
-5

Well now I at least know you're not denying the wage gaps between certain actors, or that she's getting paid less than some of her male colleagues. And I am not crying you a river, I don't know how you misconstrued my comment in such a fashion. But I think that we all agree that if there are certain sexist stereotypes still being enforced, they're being enforced in everything Hollywood related. That's just a price they have to pay for their millions of dollars, so they're certainly not "victims"…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:55 PM
-1

At least one person got the message I was getting across.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:40 PM
-1

Huh? I'm not following you. Do explain what you want to discuss about that part of my comment and I'll try to back up my claims.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 03:07 PM
37

Considering that men have been getting screwed over in these divorce and alimony settlements and nothing has changed for centuries, we apparently really do need a few women to get screwed over too to finally make some changes to these ridiculous laws.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 02:46 PM
-4

Though I know it's terribly wrong, I must admit that I find it a bit karmic for such "early stage feminists", who know little about how radical feminism has become, experience such a strong and delusional backlash from the people "they're fighting for". I hope this opens her eyes a little to the ever increasing problem that is third-wave feminism. I know she earns less money than her male co-stars and experiences sexism on a daily basis, but Hollywood is one of the most corrupted, supply-demand …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 02:36 PM
1

Yeah and this wasn't the first time, that's their usual modus operandi. Wait I'll search for a clip that got me even angrier than this one, in which he got ganged up on by more than one feminist at a "round table debate." Edit: here.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:17 AM
1

I don't know, from what I've seen him do he did a well enough job in the time he had. Especially in this clip he made his points clear enough. Though he is usually just talked over or his statistics simply disregarded and his "opponents" tend to resort to insults and arguing semantics, like this interviewer did. But yeah there's always room for improvement and I'm not sure I support "the biggest feminist liar of the month award", but at least it got him/them some attention from the media and let…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:14 AM
6

Someone in the Youtube comment section suggested she might have had that kind of approach to achieve a better interview "dynamic", but it seemed just too sincere to me. Imho, she simply couldn't care less what he has to say because she whole-heartedly disagrees with him. And because she has no arguments to back her disagreement with the only thing left to her is ridicule of his points. So I'm really not surprised by your discovery, her bias shows from a plane.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:57 AM
13

I really disliked her mocking tone of voice, it made me feel like she simply didn't believe anything he was saying. And I must say, this guy has put himself into so many situations where he was ridiculed by feminists who ganged up on him and in some other interviews they also completely disregard what he has to say and laugh at his statistics. I don't know how he can put up with this kind of behaviour, but kudos, sir, kudos.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:35 AM
1

Uhm, I'm not familiar with this case but hugging is not molestation. If a male teacher would be charged with molestation for hugging his pupil this sub wouldn't accept it either. So this isn't the best example of a double standard.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:11 AM
6

I agree with you, but to be honest your examples of "non-universal gynocentrism" are lacking, imho, for I would much rather have the courts be in my favour in most cases and have to look harder for the games that I like. I know that this was an example off the top of your head, but games won't make me feel better once a court screws me over just for being a man. The two listed areas of our life, entertainment and law, just aren't comparable. But yes, I perfectly agree with your sentiment and con…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 11:45 AM
5

Just took a quick glance into how alimony works, the TL/DR version is that it doesn't matter if the wife molested and abused a minor and the husband will most likely still have to pay her alimony. Based on how long they've been married it won't be a small one, based on their prior living standards it will most likely be what she asked for and the husband will most likely have to pay the alimony for a longer period of time. Source and the most important part of the article: You may have noticed t…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 11:26 AM
10

I have only ever ventured into that subreddit because a few posts were linked too on this subreddit. There are plenty of crazy women on there who are projecting their personal issues on other relationships to validate their beliefs. I'm glad that even in this thread the most upvoted comment is not a crazy one, but I must say there are plenty of comments that got way too much "support", imho. If you want to get silly, just wrap your Willy, no need for a vasectomy. And though I can see why the wom…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:31 PM
1

I understand, I know there's a fundamental difference between these two instances and I agree with you. But if there's at least one red piller who claims he's an MRA too, their comparison "stands". And believe me, there's more than one in there probably. There are always a few on the a bit more outlandish side.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 09:50 PM
2

And by criticizing those feminists that are on the radical side, even if they are self-proclaimed feminists, we tend to extrapolate their behaviour on the feminist movement as a whole, some accusations less justifiable than the others. So I think there is still a parallel to be drawn.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 09:01 PM
1

gender is a mix between anxiety and a hippopotamus Gender fluid* otherkins are on the rise, the future is here.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 07:44 PM
3

Even if we say we do not view them as MRA, nor hold their views, they'll just throw the no true Scotsman fallacy right back at us. "We've" used it plenty of times against feminists, tbh. Unless you want to petition to ban that Facebook page, you'll sadly just have to deal with these low blows (anti-feminists have used similar tactics before, now that I think of it) and hope people will realise this is really a tiny minority of people labelling themselves MRA that hold this twisted view. This act…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:29 PM
8

Generalisations on both sides should be avoided, just as not all men are rapists, neither do all women have this psychopathic need to falsely accuse men of rape. There are real victims on both sides and as much as I hate their exaggerated statistics (1 in 5 statistic in the Gaga video) and demeaning of real rape victims by washing down the definition of rape, there are still real rape victims out there and they deserve all the support they can get. Just not by letting these false accusations sli…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 01:05 PM
1

I would wager that every single woman that does show at their doorstep not remembering the night before will be brainwashed into believing she was raped, even if that wasn't the case and she didn't think so herself beforehand. That's the most messed up thing about this whole double standard they are enforcing. Edit: by brainwashing these women, they turn them into victims, in some cases unnecessarily, and main witnesses of the "crime", because if the woman simply thinks she was raped it's enough…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:38 PM
2

Do not take anything any political candidate says right before elections as true. They themselves don't believe it when they utter it, this is pure Machiavellism at work. This is just his way of fighting for the votes of females, a demographic in which him and his staff presume that he is the most lacking in.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:50 AM
9

Does anyone from the UK know if this received any feminist backlash already? But on a more important notice, congratulations and kudos to all the people involved in this project. This is an exemplary thing you're doing.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:23 AM
2

I might have exaggerated a bit, because I haven't come across many, if any, completely biased users to the point of not realising their hypocrisy on this sub. I think all still admit it and not outright deny it or simply aren't even able to perceive it. And I'm sure plenty users have faced the most hurtful double standards and already feel strongly about many topics but they kept their level headedness. But the fear of creating an echo-chamber in which we'll reinforce our biggest social gripes w…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:14 AM
12

I'm on the opposite side of the fence here, for if we prioritize user commentary, or user created content, this would probably become a men's version of Tumblr. Lots of unprofessional content on topics that affect users most and about which they/we are consequentially most biased about, to the point of blatant hypocrisy. That kind of content is one of the biggest reasons I greatly dislike today's feminism. On the other hand I actually enjoy simple links to the most important articles for men's r…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 11:35 PM
25

That feel when you pretty much tread on eggshells just to be absolutely sure not a single person, not even the most prone to being butthurt one, can take your comment the wrong way and you still get down-voted. I personally can't even imagine how or why anyone could disagree with this comment. Some people are simply psychopaths, because no sane person can support a woman forcing a child on someone that's not the father of the child. That's so fundamentally wrong I can't even wrap my head around …
/r/MensRights19/09/15 07:02 PM
2

Or women who can't have children also. I agree, it is an "all but men" type of thing, unethical. Not to mention there have also been reports and pleas for addressing the disparity in men's and women's health prior to 2015 which apparently went unheard.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 01:23 AM
2

You're right, this being the official strategy of UN is indeed an injustice on a larger scale than that which my original comment suggests. This might interest you as well. People pointed out that even prior to 2015 there was a disparity between men's and women's health, which needed larger attention and hoped the new strategy would see to this disparity where men are getting the raw deal. But I guess they didn't decide to go with their suggestions, this is getting worse by the minute.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 01:20 AM
3

Technically if the woman mentioned in this article was asleep, she didn't ask for his consent either, so she was the one raping him too. I hope he reports the rape to the authorities. /s (edit: though I need to admit that even I think that was indeed sexual assault what he did, so it's not a joking matter, sorry) Or is it only on men to ask for consent even if the woman is the instigator of the sexual activity? I need to know that so the next time I'm on the receiving end of such advances I know…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 12:59 AM
1

This seems like a support organisation that focuses on everything "pregnancy" related, that is women and children. I personally don't see anything completely wrong about it. It's unethical to exclude men for sure, because it has such a general goal, but overall there's nothing wrong with picking* a demographic and working* for it's improvement, imho. That's why we have cancer awareness organisations that don't work on ASL disease also, but granted they are very specific. But on the other hand I …
/r/MensRights18/09/15 12:37 AM
4

"The power of Anita compels us." feminist Borg collective
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:30 AM
9

Maybe ask her as to why "Title IX" and it's enforcement doesn't focus on promoting education and equal rights for men since they are now the minority in college and higher level education in plenty of states. Or maybe women are still perceived as the disadvantaged sex despite this statistic. Edit: I haven't done any legitimate research about this, nor am I a US citizen with personal experience regarding this topic, so I would suggest you to support your questions with data you found to support i…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:51 PM
2

the bill would clarify that individuals women* can take back their consent at any time This is what they should write for the sake of honesty. I would really like to know if these men standing there ask their wives to explicitly say yes every time. But it doesn't even matter if they say yes, if they can retroactively take that consent back... This is becoming an alarmingly serious trend and I feel for any of you college attending US guys. The environment you're in must be quite toxic towards you…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:00 PM
8

I bet that if she has children they believe the "nice guy" she chose is the real daddy, while it's really some "bad guy" fling she had way back. And all she's doing is projecting her irrational fears of her partner ever finding out about it.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:23 PM
1

Indeed. But everyone on here is diminishing the seriousness of how badly this case was handled (who knows maybe there are more than just this one case) because the open letter read very much like the feminist propaganda. I doubt most of the ridiculing commentators even took the time to read into the case and realise a boy was the real victim of this case, who got sent to "jail", or that's how the judge put it. Edit: though I do need to say the only lie in this letter was implication that the fam…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 12:44 PM
-1

https://jailingchildrenfordivorce.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/transcript_here.pdf Read this, it tells you everything you need to know about this judge, no need for psychic powers. The judge is an abuser, a crazy self-righteous one.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:13 AM
1

Here, it's the link that's in this article: https://jailingchildrenfordivorce.wordpress.com/2015/08/17/hello-world/ And this is the court transcript: https://jailingchildrenfordivorce.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/transcript_here.pdf "TL/DR" version: mom and dad got a divorce, apparently the dad was violent, hit her on at least one occasion, but didn't get charged with anything, not sure if his wife reported him or not. So after the divorce children want nothing to do with the father, this judge (…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:30 AM
1

Did any of you even read the freaking article? What this judge did was monstrous and borderline sociopathic behaviour. She forced children to "spend time and connect" with a documented abusive father based on some bogus study, just so her lawyer friend that represents the father could collect a fat pay-check. When they (children) refused to have anything to do with the father she had them locked up. This man was indeed privileged, not because of his genitalia, but his money, which bought the obv…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 09:14 PM
0

Yeah, it got watered down to just about everything that you don't like being able to "trigger" you. It's not limited to personal insecurities, but they use it a lot in "anti-fat-shaming" circle-jerks. But basically everyone uses it for anything themselves find offensive. Just yesterday I started watching a video of a fit woman on the verge of tears saying she got triggered by someone else "fat shaming" people. So she got triggered in the name of other people. It's such an universally applied "ca…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:11 PM
1

If you're wondering what a "trigger" actually is, it's referring to something (action, event*, topic) that makes them feel uncomfortable, angry. Someone can be "triggered" by a racist joke for example, if they hate racism. And yeah, it's used as an argument stopper often. When you try to prove some of their arguments wrong, or explain why their statistics are deceitful they'll just say you're mansplaining to them and claim they're triggered, effectively ending the discussion then and there.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:22 AM
15

"Why does gender neutral clothing always mean 'boy' clothes for girls?" What most of these feminists label "gender neutral clothes" are still women's clothes. They get them in women's part of the stores, they don't go into men's clothing stores and shop there. That's why I never saw any logic behind this argument, there is a demand for a certain type of women's clothing and the industry provides it, no sexism or men's privilege involved. But to touch on your "Maybe I am so indoctrinated that I d…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:58 PM
6

This is quite a loaded question, let's just get out of the way that we all interpret masculinity and femininity slightly differently, so it makes debating this quite more riddled with personal bias. But even suggesting, or desiring, that men should be more feminine implies femininity is by definition overall superior to masculinity, because why would be want to change something for the worse? I personally don't agree that a masculine person is somehow worse than a feminine one, so I see no reaso…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:39 PM
12

His employer was given evidence? I hope they don't classify the bodyguard making a statement like "he done grabbed her" and Swift's "I guess I did feel something" affirmation as "evidence". I just can't fathom why someone would willingly grab her ass in front of cameras, so without any actual evidence to confirm it, I'd have to say it was blown out of proportion. But yeah, we'll have to wait and see, but I think we all agree that this lawsuit will likely not go in his favour regardless of the re…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 12:02 PM
12

"Women are toddlers in this modern world", what? I feel like these women (her included) just don't feel like they fit within the normal social standards, get annoyed by it because they lack confidence to do their own thing, live their life like they want to, and because of that they want all other people to conform to their views, so they wouldn't feel so alone. As a result we get their tendency towards enforcing feministic reform of the world. I'm a man and I don't like how "the society" would …
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:18 AM
20

This seems like a clear case of the prosecutor deciding to botch up the case and see her walk free, if he presented the evidence to contradict her story she would be found guilty without a doubt. I'm sure the judge knew the prosecutor was doing a shit job, why he, or anyone else who could've intervened, played along with the charade alludes me.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:09 AM
1

You're right, not sure why I even asked such a question.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:51 PM
2

Tell me guys is it even worth the read, I really hate to be biased and a bit hypocritical but every time I see such a title and a female author I just know what the conclusion will be. And I'm guessing the punchline is along the chewed up lines of "men can't be objectified because there's no societal sexualisation of men like there is of women" and some other mind gymnastics to support their double standards. If I'm wrong, I'll gladly give it a read.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:58 PM
3

I thought that the irony OP was referring to was that the original poster of that "thought" implied women "have no right to choose", while the men have the right to choose and leave the woman. But we know the reality is the exact opposite. But I could be wrong and you could be right. But to come back to your thought, is there really a portion of men who believe abortions should be illegal on this subreddit? I haven't come across a single user expressing that view.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:43 PM
9

It's only irony if it's intended, this is just plain old stupidity. And to the first commenter abortions are not illegal, at least not in 1st world countries. While it is illegal for a man to financially back out of pregnancy, he'll have to pay for child support no matter what, no choice whatsoever just the obligation to heed the will of the woman.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:31 PM
30

Great, according to this article they will ban all feminist groups that protested against men's rights groups. They will also need to allow men's rights groups, no questions asked, or risk being intolerant. What? This will not be the case? They have other interpretations of being inclusive and "being free from expressions of intolerance" as us normal people do? Well shucks, who would've thought...
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:22 PM
1

Thanks, because if I follow the link in the title it just redirects me to http://radaronline.com/. Edit: it must be a geolocation thing, because I can't even access the nationalenquirer main site without being redirected. Edit nr2: wait what, Hillary is lesbian and has been out for years? I must have been living under a rock... Her being lesbian news to anyone else besides me?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 12:54 PM
2

Did they already delete the article? Because the link seems to be broken for me.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 12:42 PM
1

Erin Pizzey, I don't think I have seen many other similarly level headed individuals. Her insight on the feminist movement is quite invaluable. I feel very sorry for what she had to go through because of lunatics that didn't like her study on domestic violence. Edit: here is her take on domestic violence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnUwxxijr3g
/r/MensRights11/09/15 11:06 AM
2

OK, then we're on the same page. And this really is a frightening statistic if true. This even furthers, as you've already said, the amount of sexist bias regarding rape accusations on campuses. And thanks for pointing this one out, I have never thought about this side of the story.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:12 AM
2

Even if rape really is so prevalent in lesbian couples (I would really like to see the numbers and methods used behind these points, though) I haven't ever seen a case of a woman being falsely* accused of raping another woman on campus (not even outside of the college setting). If you know of any cases, please do link them. I am really not sure what your point was, that these instances of rape are severely under-reported and almost never put on trial or that what I said is wrong and that it's al…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:57 AM
19

There was a guy in UK who faced the exact same discrimination, sued and settled out of court. You can probably to do the same. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2311098/Peter-Lloyd-Why-Im-suing-gym-sexist-women-hours.html Edit: he offered these solutions to the gym first, but they refused them all: A) maintain a women’s hour but introduce a men's alternative for fairness, B) keep women’s hour (and only women’s hour) but annually charge men less, or C) scrap single-gender sessions altoget…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:12 PM
51

I'm surprised every single time I read about what kind of twisted individuals are given platform to spew their malicious thoughts in the name of "equality", or as she better put it women's superiority. She belongs in a mental institution and shouldn't be roaming free, much less should she be a writer for anything. Jeez, how do people fail to realize her lunacy?
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:15 PM
22

Sadly, under their (campus/college) current interpretation of the law it's basically impossible for a woman to get accused of rape, unless she penetrates a drunk guy (or girl)* with an object. Other than that, regular sex between a man and a woman can never end up in the woman being accused of rape, because if the guy got his erection he was not incapacitated according to their guidelines for drunken sexual intercourse. Not sure how it's interpreted if there was no drinking involved but I'm pret…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:33 PM
3

I know, I too have seen a lot of hypocrisy on this issue and I agree with you. But if we too were to attempt to ban comedic material (in general, not this ad) just because we got offended by it, we'd lower to their (feminist*) level of censorship, which I always disliked greatly and opposed. That's my biggest gripe with this issue. But /u/Wargame4life pointed out that this is an ad and it doesn't follow the guidelines in UK, so attempts to get it removed would be justifiable. Edit: added a word …
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:24 PM
1

Yeah, that is different, I guess my point was more hypothetical for comedy in general. You did raise a valid point though and a complaint against this add should be on a basis that the ad is going against advertising guidelines in UK, not simply that someone got offended by it. Like we've seen plenty of attempts of censoring from the feminist movement, just because they deemed something offensive.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:18 PM
43

I'm not sure if my view on this go down well in this sub, but if we expect women to accept rape jokes as "only comedy", we should also accept this kind of humour. I didn't laugh, didn't even think it was funny, but I accept this as someone's attempt at comedy. So to answer your "would it be allowed if it was a girl", I say that if they attempted censoring it, their reason to do so would come from the same place as your disgust. I think we should give comedy a bit of a slack, "sex-blind slack".
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:37 PM
35

These people must all have their degrees in "mind gymnastics with intention to explain why our hypocrisy is justified and therefore not hypocrisy". Slogan of this university is "Look it up!but only in university approved feminist material".
/r/MensRights08/09/15 10:04 AM
11

Why? Because political correctness and ever increasing influence over young minds by gender equality (feminist) lobby. They are mind-washed to believe they are oppressed on their every step and given a platform (twitter and other social media) to easily express how they got triggered by something trivial. They are given the status of victims in any matter most matters* by general media (reporters take their side, harass and portrait the men's rights side as the oppressor) which then in turn enfo…
/r/MensRights08/09/15 09:46 AM
3

This is one of those issues that are quite clearly unfair for men and even though the woman could easily pay for the date too, it's always been so incredibly awkward for me to not pay. And out of the women I took on first dates only one was adamant on paying the bill. Even she said it was to pay me back for a favour I did her beforehand. So yeah, my anecdotal experience supports that the majority of women hold the "man should pay" view and us men hold the "we should pay" view too. For me persona…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 11:52 PM
1

I haven't read anything scientific or actually informative on this site. It's apparently just a bunch of soccer moms saving the Earth by saying no, on a personal level, to energy derived from fossil fuels. But hey, there are worse things they could be doing with their free time. I just hope they wouldn't just scratch the surface of greenhouse gases problematic and wouldn't bring sexism into it.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:24 AM
12

Double standard? Of course. The same kind of logic can be applied to women too and crudely say "if she got "wet", she wasn't incapacitated". What this boils down to is if a drunk man and a drunk woman have regular sex, the man was definitely not intoxicated, while he can still get accused of rape on a whim of the coordinator and based on how well they brain wash the woman, that she was indeed the victim of sexual assault. Just do yourself a favour and don't engage in any kind of sexual activity,…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:59 PM
31

If you want some information about why that isn't bigotry you should totally buy her e-book. Maybe you'll see the light then.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:40 AM
322

“I was completely confused,” she said. “Chic CEO does not discriminate against men.” No, no, of course they would never discriminate against men, that's ridiculous. They just don't allow them to participate in the event, that's different. /s I guess that's the kind of mentality you develop when you subscribe to the "you can't discriminate against "privileged" people" theory.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:18 AM
4

I support her action, I mean he did try to rob her, maybe that will teach him a lifetime lesson not to do it again. But on the other hand, I do agree that the public at hand wouldn't be so supportive of a guy that performed a similar leg lock on a woman, who then pleaded to be let go. I don't think the bystanders would laugh at her face. But yeah, this was far from rape, nor was he a "robber" in quotation marks, he was just a plain robber. :)
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:51 PM
24

I'm a white man and I have absolutely zero access to any platform for me to express myself publicly which this individual claims I have. And please don't tell me she is a thriving, at least she's given quite a public platform to express her views, student of Oxford University. That would be quite sad.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 05:16 PM
11

Lesson 1: got physically assaulted by feminist classmates, for bringing logic into the discussion. Abandoning the project due to high risk of further bodily harm.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:22 AM
73

What kind of a retarded, biased and blinded by hate person do you have to be to withhold evidence that points to the innocence of the guy you're putting behind bars? I really don't know if the police officers and the prosecutor involved were all sociopaths, or they just convinced themselves they have "the right guy" and no evidence would convince them otherwise. Fuck.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 05:32 PM
1

Yet women are the end users of said service, so it's only logical they pander to their desires on every step of the process. Men usually don't seek sperm, in a cup or any other form, to impregnate themselves. Edit: just to clarify, women are the paying end users of this service (or couples, but with the woman being the one that is focused), so what's why they do this. While they actually pay men for their sperm, which is motivation enough apparently for most of them. This is not an industry that…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:55 PM
4

Well, now it all makes sense, thanks.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:50 AM
107

Not sure if pussy pass or connections pass.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:44 AM
13

I might actually think she feels some remorse if that was the only photo I saw and didn't read the texts. Let's face it, that's how much time an average person puts into the article, read the title, look at the photos, skim through it. A person like that might think she really is at least remorseful if not innocent. But to put things into perspective they could have used this photo, from the same court hearing: link. And her body language does indeed seem more frank in this one and that's the re…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:06 AM
14

I guess a woman would be running it because women are "the customers" of these sperm banks. Men just provide the traded goods. So a female director would be more approachable, I guess. Likewise would a sperm bank with such slogan make a good impression on the customers (females) that what they're offering is "good stuff". They don't care about the men.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:26 PM
165

I hate how they keep using the remorseful puppy eyes court photo. I just hope no one is dumb enough to fall for it, especially the judge or the jury.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:53 PM
50

Talking about the issue with a person like she is would likely result in this dialogue: Teresa: "My hands were tied, I am not to blame." Reporter: "Why didn't you at least speak out about the injustice and suggested a change in the system?" Teresa: "You're triggering me." I can not even begin to imagine how it must feel to be falsely accused of rape, with the whole world, your family included, believing the accusations. Most people will never even stop believing this false accusation and still p…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:23 PM
4

Would very sexy and physically smaller men also be able to ride this special train, if they too feared sexual assault? /s And boy, oh boy, do I hate this argument "it shouldn't be on women, to change their behaviour and adapt it should be on men to change theirs" and label anything else victim blaming. So, we normal functioning majority of men should avoid women to make them feel more at ease, because they are suffering from a state of paranoia inflicted upon them by these crazy feminists. How a…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 07:38 PM
4

This is just your typical run of the mill feminist propaganda, a lot of talk about the famous "gender equality" in the recommendations to avoid blatantly favouring women and not sound too hypocritical. But every single example it provides as to how to go about achieving "gender equality" is in favour of women: more females on education governing boards, more female teachers in STEM studies to provide better role models (I guess men can not be good role models for women). But no mention of a majo…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:19 AM
4

I know, it isn't a black white issue, but the fact remains he is propagating this misinterpretation of data even further and giving it credence in the eyes of the public. And if he's willing to lie about this, who knows what else of what he's "standing for" he personally doesn't believe in and is just doing it for the affection of the public.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:46 PM
39

Oh my, I actually liked this guy. Any time someone I thought was honest and intellectual takes such a stand it makes me rethink everything else he/she ever said and the motivation behind those stands. Because you must be an advanced level of dumb, which I doubt in this case, or simply pushing an agenda (probably just fishing for votes) to even utter this hundred times debunked fallacy, which is continuously being revived these past few decades.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 09:50 PM
2

I have a very different view on the term friendzone and how it's used and I do believe it wasn't used in this context at first. For instance, I've mostly seen it used by other men to jokingly describe a friendship their friend, or any other man, has with a woman friend in which he obviously wants something more out of it and the woman views him as a friend only. The guy sticks around and does many things for this girl, gives her gifts, pays her attention in hopes that she'll view him as somethin…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:26 PM
3

Indeed, your new figures are accurate if we do not stop at 1.0, but their way of calculating this is so wrong, as you've said already. Comparing apples to oranges if we talk figuratively. But you just showed us to do "statistics" to suit your message. By simply tweaking one method of calculation you get quite a different result. Just imagine if you tweak your whole process to suit the message you're trying to get across. And not to mention the whole political representation again. Women make up …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:37 AM
6

I love how they* grey out the over 1.0 "equality ratio" and still label the country completely gender equal by giving it a score of 1.0, even if* said score is in favour of women by a high margin (1.5+ in plenty of cases). What I also love is the little statistic called "Wage equality for similar work (survey)" where the definition of similar can be skewed to fit any narrative and the survey written in a way to potentiate reporter bias. This is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:46 AM
5

Screw The Guardian, or any other bigger "media" for that matter, for providing a platform for this kind of utterly biased drivel.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:34 PM
34

Just look at the stark difference between the court photos of her. In the first one she's looking like she doesn't regret anything and clearly thinks she didn't do anything wrong. But when the time comes to pretend to be sorry and innocent we get photo number 2. And guess which one any media will use to try and portrait her as innocent. This boy just wanted to be loved and she denied him that by pretending and pushing him over the edge. Just despicable. She's a sociopath in my book.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:25 PM
9

"...so I definitely won this battle" she said after she put down her giant purse which by itself took up a whole seat. Feminism trumped over logic yet again and another battle was won.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:50 PM
5

I'm having flashbacks to university. There I encountered quite a few men and women who thought they were geniuses and felt the need to express their opinions about every single thing, mostly the ones they were completely biased* about. Sadly, she seems to fall into that category. Their biggest argument and "proof" that you are wrong is simply them saying "you are wrong" or in this case "you are a troll" and strut around with a victorious smirk on their face. May god have mercy on anyone's blood …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:22 PM
2

What can I say, this happens when you create a safe and easy place for people to do things they normally probably wouldn't. This site promoted adultery and made people think: "If so many people are doing it, it can't be that bad/unacceptable right? And it's with utmost privacy so I'll never get caught." I think that people that think their lives are over now and are committing suicide over it, wouldn't have cheated in the first place, if not for this site. If they perceive the negative social st…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:18 PM
6

We view rape as a despicable word, and any action that we label rape as despicable too, because we as a society have attributed to it a very negative social stigma. The same should be done for the word used to define female on male rape. But yes, I do agree with your argument. I even said that it shouldn't be downplayed in significance.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:56 PM
22

No one should be too surprised by her stance on this issue. I haven't met many feminists known for their unbiased way of thinking. I personally don't care if they label female on male rape as sexual assault, or invent a whole new expression. Just as long they don't down play the seriousness of the offence and keep sentences and conviction rates equal to those of male on female rape. Edit: I also think that a new word to describe the female on male forced sexual intercourse, without penetration f…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:27 PM
123

Anecdotally, I've never seen more physically very fit men, to the point that they seem like they just walked off a photo session, at the beach. So I think this is more about our ever increasing perception of ourselves and worrying about how we look, rather than the actual physical fitness. I mean, the fittest man who looks like he was photoshopped could still answer that he doesn't like his physique still and needs to improve. Edit: hmm, maybe these fit men everywhere are the ones seeding the se…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:11 PM
1

It's 1 hour 14 minutes, it repeats itself.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:56 PM
4

Much obliged. One more thing, was there anything special these "gender equalists" were censoring ("protesting") or was it just the show in general without any explanation behind it? Because I was already sold on the bias of the field after the 180:10 gender equality professors in Germany ratio was mentioned. That's just absurd. Edit: my German isn't that great but I got to the part where they are petitioning to change Studentenwerk into Studierendenwerk, please tell me this is laughed out of the…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 03:25 PM
7

Any links to this particular episode? I'd really love to see what was so offensive, or at least know what they talked about specifically. I presume we are talking about a single episode and not an entire talk show that has to purged? If it's the latter this is an even more absurd incident. This kind of power and censorship feminists are displaying all around the world is getting quite frustrating.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:17 PM
4

OK, Google did a worse job of translating than you did. And to be perfectly honest it does sound a bit more reasonable this way. Still, the end result is the same and just ridiculous for a gender equality group. And let's not forget to mention that the same kind of logic she has can be applied to any male dominated field they want to "gender equalize", by saying: "we interviewed women too, but men were simply better qualified for the job". But I guess that's not a stance these groups would accep…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:02 AM
11

You place a person in charge for hiring new people for a "gender equality group". Said person is also the leader of said "gender equality group". This person then hires exclusively women, admits she probably interviewed more women than men and stands behind her decisions (if Google translator did his job correctly, that's the gist of the article, with some passive aggressive people not trying to speak too openly about how silly it is, probably because of fear of feminist backlash). It's clear to…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 07:57 AM
7

Not sure why the downvotes, could be some people are biased because they like Colbert's other work. And yes, they grossly misrepresented facts, probably intentionally, and only put the focus on the girls who are out of school, when the number of boys out of school is almost equal. That's just appalling. You just can not say stuff like "education for all" if you label your cause "education for girls". This gives the impression that only girls face this discrimination which is far from the truth a…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:37 PM
-3

Though I agree with their decision, it is after all wrong to give people preferential treatment based on their sex or race, it think it's only fair that all affirmative action is prohibited. It is reverse sexism and racism after all, I can't even comprehend how it was introduced in the first place. It really is not the right way to go about diversifying the working fields.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 08:16 PM
2

Out of curiosity I read a stance of professor Cynthia Grant Bowma on this issue (first hit on Google search for "legal consent and alcohol"). Though I do not know if her stance is an accurate representation of the law regarding this issue too, or just her trying to push a certain narrative, I was quite shocked how elegantly they really did push (or are actively trying) a lot of blame on the men when coming to drunk sex. Here's the link: https://share.cornell.edu/education-engagement/sex-alcohol-…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:54 PM

"Give me a thank, give me a thank you for feminists for getting you a right to vote. Otherwise stop voting and go make me a ham sandwich" this is where I lost all my respect for Cenk. Frankly he seemed positively dumb in this video, operating only on an emotional level, not to mention personal bias regarding circumcision, while dismissing most facts Karen presented. This was indeed quite infuriating as he stated bot not because of Karen.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter