~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Wife Who Burned Husband to Death Says, 'I Just Wanted To Burn His Penis So It Belongs To Me And No One Else'So... You're saying that trying to burn his penis off isn't a terrible thing... I suppose this was an attempt to be humorous. Now she pays for that for the rest of her life. She should. Had the poor man lived, he would have paid worse; it's a good thing he died. remember that in her culture, women are burned alive every day simply because the husband no longer wants to be married to her. First of all, she's not living in some cave; she's in Australia. Secondly, culture is one of the poorest excu… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/09 12:48 AM |
| 5 | Wife Who Burned Husband to Death Says, 'I Just Wanted To Burn His Penis So It Belongs To Me And No One Else'I know she did a terrible thing, but she didn't intend for him to die His penis would have been burned off! WTF is wrong with you? | /r/MensRights | 20/01/09 12:19 AM |
| 2 | a girl can claim that you did something to her four years ago, and you can be arrested out of the blue and thrown in prison on a bail they know you have no way of making.Interestingly, I've read that a man can only file a suit against his circumciser within 3 years of becoming 18 years old. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/09 12:05 AM |
| 1 | "I have never forgiven you for the way you looked at me the first time I hit you."young boy with a foreskin that doesn't retract Actually, phimosis and paraphimosis are generally caused by forced retraction of the foreskin. It is perfectly normal for a boy (even up into late adolescence) not to be able to retract his foreskin fully: The fused mucosa of the glans penis and the inner lining of the prepuce separates gradually over years, as a spontaneous biological process. Topical steroid [14-16] and nonsteroidal [17] anti-inflammatory ointments are known to accelerate the glan… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/09 10:03 PM |
| 1 | Men are expected to be grateful for the excellent medical care, thankful we live in a country whose government will have part of our dick cut off when we're too young to consent or fight back.I found it offensive to discuss a serious and important issue using slang. I just don't understand this hang up you and BinaryShadow have. However, I'm glad to have come across it and I will definitely be sure to avoid unnecessary slang in my posts. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/09 09:24 PM |
| 1 | Men are expected to be grateful for the excellent medical care, thankful we live in a country whose government will have part of our dick cut off when we're too young to consent or fight back.You have a point; I suppose most people are too dimwitted to look past 'immature words'. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/09 06:02 PM |
| 3 | Men are expected to be grateful for the excellent medical care, thankful we live in a country whose government will have part of our dick cut off when we're too young to consent or fight back.Couldn't she just use the term "penis" ? I don't see how slang was appropriate here. It makes people realize that it's personal. Penis is that thing you learn about in anatomy. Dick is what you use to fuck and enjoy your sex life. Your reaction alone confirms this. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/09 06:28 AM |
| 0 | Male Circumcision Ineffective in HIV Battle According to Future HIV Therapy ReportVery recently, HIV/AIDS has replaced UTIs as the scare-tactic for promoting amputation of the foreskin. However, safe sexual practices are not only essential, but they are the only reliable and effective means for controlling and avoiding sexually transmitted diseases; even though the UN's recent (U.S.-led) studies suggest that circumcision reduces the incidence of HIV infection, the UN still acknowledges that only sex education and sexually responsible behavior (such as using condoms) are effec… | /r/MensRights | 09/01/09 10:59 AM |
| 1 | Rotating Polyandry (or, Why Women have Affairs) (pdf)The greatest threat to proper parenting in our time is divorce, overwhelmingly initiated by the wife (70-75 percent of the time, according to Langley). I wonder if that's related to this. ;-) Of course, I should be careful. 70%-75% of men (worldwide, though) are not circumcised... | /r/MensRights | 28/12/08 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.The most important factor is technique. So... my favourite is the Asian guy. Was the Asian guy's penis actually shorter? I recall having read that the shorter penis actually stimulates the G-spot more directly (in women that have an appreciable G-spot). However, I have really not read much on this subject, so I may be spewing FUD. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/08 07:50 AM |
| 3 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.So sad and so true. The world is pretty fucked up, isn't it? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 10:22 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.Yes I did realize, but I misinterpreted your last reference to orgasm. However, the foreskin does increase girth, which is the dimension that is most important for stimulating a woman (other than clitoral impact). EDIT: Also, the foreskin doesn't have a particular 'spot' per se, as it is extremely mobile along the shaft. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 09:20 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.The area that produces orgasm is not really anywhere around where the foreskin would be and thusly wouldn't be directly responsible for orgasm. However, the reduction in irritation can help make it easier to orgasm. Orgasm is not synonymous with ejaculation. The intensity of the orgasm has a lot to do with the stimulation during the entire sex act. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 07:16 PM |
| 2 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.Or cause lasting damage. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 07:13 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.In the context of reducing friction during sex, the simulated foreskin has potential of being an effective replacement. No doubt, but it's dangerous to let people think that the foreskin can be grown back, because it can't. More importantly, many men can't even attempt to grow extra tissue for lack of tissue to stretch. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 07:23 AM |
| 4 | Dr. Benjamin Spock does not support circumcision.What's even more sad is that the AAP already called for a end to medically unnecessary circumcision in the 1970s. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 07:19 AM |
| 2 | Circumcision leads to increased risk of MRSA (warning - graphic pics)I cried. I am so upset. And that could have been avoided! | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 07:16 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.You're absolutely correct, but what can be done but apologize to current generations? Current generations should take heart in knowing that they can positively affect the future by refusing to propagate this needless amputation. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 07:08 AM |
| 2 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.Incidentally, you can stretch the skin on your shaft so it grows and simulates foreskin. This is not a valid solution, because there are very specialized structures, muscles, veins, and nerves that can never be grown back. At most, foreskin restoration gives you some of the mechanical function back, though it's not nearly the same. Worse, many men (especially in the U.S.) are circumcised 'tight', so that they don't even have enough skin to contemplate stretching it out. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 06:45 AM |
| 2 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.Sex has always been great for me My vision has always been great, except that I'm colorblind, and I had no idea that this is the case until I got to college and someone posted a joke similar to this one. It was then that I new and came to grips with the fact that there are colors and color combinations I will never be able to enjoy. I think good sex has more of a mental thing anyway so I'm a bit skeptical. I wish that colorblindness were more of a mental thing. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 06:43 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.Indeed, consider this. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 06:38 AM |
| 4 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.I think this decision should be left to the parents. How can medically unnecessary, cosmetic, elective, damaging surgery be a decision parents are allowed to make? Do you not see the irrationality of circumcision? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 06:37 AM |
| 2 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.This is not really a funny issue. Neonatal circumcision is a slight against the human rights, dignity, respect, and personal liberty of our new generations of men. Bugcoder was trying to obfuscate this discussion. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 06:36 AM |
| 0 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.And this says otherwise. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 06:34 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.He's being sarcastic, in case you didn't catch it. The link is to some guy, who was trying to obfuscate this discussion. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 06:34 AM |
| 4 | Circumcision: baby boy screams himself hoarse. He's under anesthesia. Dad gets weak and asks for help.This is not really a funny issue. I imagine this is your coping mechanism. Neonatal circumcision is a slight against the human rights, dignity, respect, and personal liberty of our new generations of men. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/08 06:32 AM |
| 7 | young mother discusses circumcisionAnd whether she did or not, is irrelevant. nails and hairs do not contain nerves; they are dead tissue. More importantly, they grow back fully. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/08 10:50 AM |
| 1 | Yahoo Answers: What feels better circumcised or uncircumcised?Well, actually, you have no idea. Unless you perhaps got circumcised after having sex with a few women first? This is ridiculous. I am red-green colorblind, but do I not know that I'm missing something? The visual test isn't even necessary; you can tell whether somebody has too few or deficient cone cells by just looking at the DNA or by observing in an autopsy. This isn't a matter of personal belief. The body is a machine that we understand fairly well, and we understand that the foreskin is co… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/08 03:49 AM |
| 1 | Yahoo Answers: What feels better circumcised or uncircumcised?Also, It was through the Frenum, type Prince Albert in google. The frenulum of the circumcised penis is either very underdeveloped or absent (though they avoid removing it these days). | /r/MensRights | 09/12/08 11:42 PM |
| 2 | Yahoo Answers: What feels better circumcised or uncircumcised?Anyway, when I think about it, if I had become Jewish the need for a circumcision wouldn't be an issue. That's plainly a rationalization. After all that, now I have a piercing so I guess I can't hold it against my parent for messing up my junk. You're lucky you had enough skin to do that; so called 'tight' circumcisions are the norm in the U.S. and some men don't have nearly enough skin even to understand how someone might get a piercing (anywhere but the scrotum maybe). | /r/MensRights | 09/12/08 11:14 PM |
| 0 | Yahoo Answers: What feels better circumcised or uncircumcised?My comments may be of service. Here are some: this This This This This This This This This This This This This This This Also, American parents should be wary of ignorant medical practitioners. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/08 10:43 PM |
| 3 | Mr. Foreskin, where are you?Fear not! I have come to the rescue! | /r/MensRights | 06/12/08 07:55 AM |
| 2 | 1 in 6 boys are sexually abused before the age of 16. Here's the evidence.Thank you. I appreciate your encouragement; I've been losing my strength to continue battling this issue, and your comment shows me that not all people are insane. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/08 05:49 AM |
| 1 | Feminist myths 'are making equality laws unfair to men' - Dr. Catherine HakimI think always bringing up circumcision like this will undermine the goal, too . . . If people who already think the circumcision debate is absurd see it being brought up randomly, they'd just use it to confirm their belief on the matter. You make a good point, but I truly find it hard to see another way, as circumcised men want to believe they have the better deal and intact men don't give a shit. Perhaps I will leave the public domain on this subject, and seek to bring medical schools into mod… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/08 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Feminist myths 'are making equality laws unfair to men' - Dr. Catherine HakimHow about feminists, who support circumcision to dull the sexual drive of men, or the feminists, who support circumcision, because they (wrongly) think a circumcised penis satisfies women better? | /r/MensRights | 04/12/08 08:00 PM |
| 1 | Feminist myths 'are making equality laws unfair to men' - Dr. Catherine HakimThis is a crowd in which there are members of the choir. I would hope the choir would join me in singing a song they know. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/08 04:32 PM |
| 1 | Feminist myths 'are making equality laws unfair to men' - Dr. Catherine HakimYou're not the one that needs the information; I would certainly hope that when parents are confronted with the papers to authorize circumcision for their child, they will just roll their eyes. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/08 02:54 PM |
| -6 | Feminist myths 'are making equality laws unfair to men' - Dr. Catherine HakimOne of those myths is that it's better to have a mutilated penis. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/08 03:40 AM |
| 1 | 1 in 6 boys are sexually abused before the age of 16. Here's the evidence.Who would down vote this comment? One day your son will not just be "your child"---he will be an independent adult man. If you forcefully circumcise your son, then you are forcefully circumcising a random adult man. The foreskin has been scientifically, medically, and statistically shown to be composed of a number of specialized tissues and tens of thousands of specialized erogenous nerve endings. Medically unnecessary ("preventive") circumcision constitutes the amputation of healthy, functional… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/08 05:52 AM |
| 2 | The Gilgal Society: Purported publisher of medical materials for education, but specializes in male circumcision. Oh, Gilgal is where Joshua orders men to be circumcised in Jewish tradition.One day your son will not just be "your child"---he will be an independent adult man. If you forcefully circumcise your son, then you are forcefully circumcising a random adult man. The foreskin has been scientifically, medically, and statistically shown to be composed of a number of specialized tissues and tens of thousands of specialized erogenous nerve endings. Medically unnecessary ("preventive") circumcision constitutes the amputation of healthy, functional, valuable tissue---and there are … | /r/MensRights | 30/11/08 03:51 AM |
| 4 | Researchers estimate that 1 in 6 men have experienced unwanted or abusive sexual experiences before age 16.In the United States, I would estimate that 4 in 5 men have suffered an unwanted or abusive sexual experience: Circumcision. One day your son will not just be "your child"---he will be an independent adult man. If you forcefully circumcise your son, then you are forcefully circumcising a random adult man. The foreskin has been scientifically, medically, and statistically shown to be composed of a number of specialized tissues and tens of thousands of specialized erogenous nerve endings. Medicall… | /r/MensRights | 28/11/08 05:29 PM |
| 1 | Women have an evolutionary goal of of marrying nice, resourceful men, and cuckolding them with handsome, masculine men with higher levels of testosterone.You are very correct. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/08 05:23 PM |
| 0 | Babysitting while white (and male) nets a three - officer responseWhat do you expect from a society that greedily mutilates its boys' penises? dunk71: When my son was born, in a Catholic hospital (because it was the best, closest hospital), they almost circumcised him without our consent. In fact, totally against our wishes. Three different nurses asked us, over the course of a few hours, if we wanted him circumcised, to which we politely said "no, thank you" and were met with looks of surprise bordering on shock. Then another nurse turned up and started fussi… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/08 04:51 PM |
| 1 | study finds that the glans of the uncircumcized penis is more sensitive than that of the curcumcized one.You might want to discuss this with sylvan though: "Additionally, many women report that the prolonged and harder thrusting circumcised men use in order to achieve orgasm..." Yes indeed, but you're misinterpreting. This only states that the circumcised man achieves orgasm with a bout of prolonged and hard thrusting, not that he can last longer in order to please his partner and himself better. Because the shaft glides within the foreskin, there is a level of indirection between the sexual stimul… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/08 01:54 AM |
| 1 | study finds that the glans of the uncircumcized penis is more sensitive than that of the curcumcized one.Thank you very much for the link. I will add it in the "How did the American medical community allow circumcision to become so pervasive?" section. Here is also a good link. EDIT: Hmmmm.... It turns out I've maxed out the comment length. I'll have to be careful about how I work these in. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/08 01:39 AM |
| -2 | study finds that the glans of the uncircumcized penis is more sensitive than that of the curcumcized one.If you're circumcised or have circumcised boys, you shouldn't just support it blindly. Please open your mind and do some reading. There is a lot more to the foreskin than this comment provides. Virtually all men in the world are intact (not circumcised), including animals. The foreskin is not an anomaly that must be removed. Anybody (male or female) that is circumcised is abnormal in all but a handful of countries that still perpetuate this backward, barbaric, irrational practice. Millions of ye… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/08 12:38 AM |
| 1 | study finds that the glans of the uncircumcized penis is more sensitive than that of the curcumcized one.Circys last longer. I assume you mean that those, who are circumcised, don't suffer as much from premature ejaculation. This is simply not true. The foreskin provides not just more sensitivity to the brain, but enhanced sensitivity. With more information, the man has more control. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/08 12:37 AM |
| -5 | Women have an evolutionary goal of of marrying nice, resourceful men, and cuckolding them with handsome, masculine men with higher levels of testosterone.What's worse is that many women in the U.S. support mutilating boys by having their foreskins forcefully removed. You may have been circumcised and have no idea what was taken from you; you're not normal. Read about the foreskin and see this and read about the foreskin. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/08 05:24 PM |
| 2 | If you support forcefully cutting up a defenseless kid's dick, then you support cutting up a defenseless adult's dick. This is a Man's Rights issue!But you're already in the 'tell me what to do' club, because you support parents, who randomly choose a man and then circumcise him. This man is their adult child. You act like raising a child is the same as owning a chair. You know, you were a child once. What if your parents had decided to remove one of your testicles to reduce the risk of testicular cancer. You're comment suggests you'd be fine with that. Now extrapolate... Can you truly be serious, bustlinSlug? Surely you realize the degree … | /r/MensRights | 24/11/08 03:45 AM |
| 3 | "I have never forgiven you for the way you looked at me the first time I hit you."In modern times, I think many American men want their boys circumcised simply because they think: (1) it's normal (2) it's healthier/cleaner We have plenty of statistics that show both are false; we just need to disabuse the public of these myths and rationalizations (coping mechanisms more likely). | /r/MensRights | 24/11/08 02:42 AM |
| 3 | "I have never forgiven you for the way you looked at me the first time I hit you."It is irrational and detrimental to future generations to be so closed-minded, simply because you don't want to face the fact that you might be wrong. In my lengthy and tiring discussions of circumcision, I've come to find that people don't want to be on the losing team. Eventually, the sole reason for promoting circumcision boils down to "A lot of people that surround me do it" and "It's all I know". This is particularly frustrating when it comes from women. I suppose women don't want to upset … | /r/MensRights | 24/11/08 02:31 AM |
| 2 | Study: Fine-touch pressure threshold (sensitivity) is reduced in the circumcised male glans and the 5 most sentivive parts of the penis are removed by circumcision [pdf]More interesting is the fact that the foreskin provides more information to the brain, giving the man more control. The foreskin provides not just more sensitivity, but enhanced sensitivity. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/08 01:58 AM |
| 0 | If you support forcefully cutting up a defenseless kid's dick, then you support cutting up a defenseless adult's dick. This is a Man's Rights issue!If you're circumcised or have circumcised boys, you shouldn't just support it blindly. Please open your mind and do some reading. There is a lot more to the foreskin than this comment provides. Virtually all men in the world are intact (not circumcised), including animals. The foreskin is not an anomaly that must be removed. Anybody (male or female) that is circumcised is abnormal in all but a handful of countries that still perpetuate this backward, barbaric, irrational practice. Millions of ye… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/08 01:50 AM |
| 3 | "I have never forgiven you for the way you looked at me the first time I hit you."Your hatred is misdirected. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/08 12:05 AM |
| -3 | "I have never forgiven you for the way you looked at me the first time I hit you."She flew into a rage. She started yelling at me in front of the class and attacked me for even suggesting that the answer sheet could possibly be wrong. She said that every teacher who used the same text book we used would be using the same answer sheets we were using and that "they" would never allow an error on an answer sheet which is so widely used in schools. Sounds like the response people have for anti-circumcision arguments. Please read about the foreskin and it's function; don't mutilat… | /r/MensRights | 23/11/08 07:57 PM |
| 1 | We call on members of Congress to pass the MGM bill into law without delay so that boys may enjoy the same protection from circumcision as girls."If you never knew, it's new to you! If you're circumcised or have circumcised boys, you shouldn't just support it blindly. Please open your mind and do some reading. There is a lot more to the foreskin than this comment provides. Millions of years of evolution no doubt resulted in the selection of the sexual mechanism that maximizes sexual pleasure. Hence, it is understandable that circumcision (genital mutilation) increases the risk of sexual dysfunction. It is without doubt that circumcision i… | /r/MensRights | 22/11/08 04:53 AM |
| 1 | Mutilating for God -- Some children are forced into bloody riteLet's not forget circumcision! Millions of years of evolution no doubt resulted in the selection of the sexual mechanism that maximizes sexual pleasure. Hence, it is understandable that circumcision (genital mutilation) increases the risk of sexual dysfunction, such as premature ejaculation. It is without doubt that circumcision increases the risk of psychological sexual dysfunction. A man, who is unhappy with his foreskin, can elect to undergo a circumcision. A man, who was forcefully circumcis… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/08 10:56 AM |
| 1 | FGM is absolutely evil, but let's take the foreskins of boys and use them to make ourselves prettier and more youthful.Take a look at this. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/08 09:11 AM |
| 1 | Legislation for boys same as girls: No more genital mutilationMillions of years of evolution no doubt resulted in the selection of the sexual mechanism that maximizes sexual pleasure. Hence, it is understandable that circumcision (genital mutilation) increases the risk of sexual dysfunction, such as premature ejaculation. It is without doubt that circumcision increases the risk of psychological sexual dysfunction. A man, who is unhappy with his foreskin, can elect to undergo a circumcision. A man, who was forcefully circumcised as a child, has no physical … | /r/MensRights | 20/11/08 08:05 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter