TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrLuthor Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by MrLuthor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You also said that it was a fallacy to do a bad thing if someone else has done a bad thing to you. That implies that Self defense is not justified and if self defense isnt justified then violence cant be either. Regardless of the above your scenario is that someone weaker hits someone stronger and they retaliate by hitting them back? I suppose I could see that but first the smaller person would have to hit the other first. At that point you are at worst inviting them to hit you back. You have th…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:45 AM
1

I came to a similar conclusion.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:15 AM
1

Surprise is what if not the unexpected? Therefore the negative of surprise would be expectation. Admittedly I do like your wording better. As far as reciprocity goes I would say this. If you make the choice to hit someone who hasnt hit you and they can hit back harder, you have made a poor decision. Your premise is that violence is never justified. I find it fallacious because acting in defense of your self is justifiable. Violence should be your last option but its still an option. The entire a…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:43 AM
3

Except I had already used consequence in that sentence and would have had to restructure it again. I think I was giving up on fine tuning my response at that point they got progressively less eloquent afterwards.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:27 PM
1

I suppose you have a point in that hypothetical situation. Fights without weapons are really what Im referring to here. Anything more and Ill have to explain my ideas on self defense in all situations and that would be time consuming.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:25 PM
1

Indeed that clears up a lot and I find we are in agreement.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:21 PM
2

We are kind of getting into the minutiae here but, I think I get the gist of what you are saying. So in your eyes you should attempt to restrain over striking back correct? If that is the case then you are entering into a physical altercation with the other person. During that time they may hit you freely and cause you further injury. How are you going to restrain them? A hold of some kind? Those can injure someone just as easily as striking them. If you can restrain someone without getting hurt…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:20 PM
3

Oh god yes if some pro fighter goes out and starts shit then yeah fuck that guy. That however, was not my point. I was saying that he has every right to defend himself despite being attacked by someone who is weaker. That weaker person shouldnt go and pick fights expecting the other person not to retaliate because the other person is stronger that makes no sense.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 08:59 PM
2

God I wish I couldve thought of a better word or phrasing. Im thinking I should have subbed in something about karma.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 08:54 PM
4

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:21 PM
91

Ugh I had a conversation with someone like this just yesterday over in /r/pussypassdenied . This person equated women to children asking if we would fight a child. They also said that a because a man is so much bigger than a woman that its like a pro fighter going against an average guy and that their hands and feet could be considered deadly weapons. It was a meandering mess of a conversation but I think I made my point. Edit: Heres the post I made that I think best sums up my stance Fight a ch…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:45 PM
3

Indeed I would say he used sufficient force to stop her from attacking him. He did not continue to hit her as she was on the floor. I wouldnt call it excessive as that would be continuing to beat her after she was complacent. According to Chief of Police James Powers “The instant compliance is obtained, anything beyond that becomes excessive " found in this article. He also says that physical force is whats used to respond to physical force.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/16 10:54 PM
5

Okay so a trained fighters appendages can be considered deadly weapons. What has that got to do with the price of fish? Is he no longer entitled to defend himself? I really dont think so and that is what you are implying. Also are you saying that men are considered to be deadly weapons if they hit a woman? At this point Im fairly certain you are trolling me but either way I do no feel I will change your mind on this subject. So we will have to agree to disagree.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/16 10:19 PM
5

Lets see if I got this right. Average Dude vs Woman = Pro fighter vs Average Dude An interesting assumption but I'll run with it. As a hypothetical lets say an average dude goes about yelling, screaming, and hitting a professional fighter/military warrior. Now theres two real options in this scenario. Option one your option he stands there and takes it because he's tough. Option two he lays a beatdown on average dude. Now in the first scenario our deadliest warrior while being a trained professi…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/16 08:48 PM
6

Fight a child? No. Fight an adult? Yes. Women are not children they are adults and should act accordingly. This is the reason we tell children not to hit each other, because as adults we can seriously hurt another person and in doing so may cause that person to seriously hurt them in turn. Now Im not endorsing the Chris Brown type of beatdown on women. I am simply stating that if an adult hits another adult, then you can expect that other adult to hit back. Seems fairly reasonable doesn't it? No…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/16 08:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter