TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrMagick2104 Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by MrMagick2104 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The problem with being a housewife is that it's boring as fuck work. Perhaps literally one of the most boring jobs out there. And there's no career, no change, no anything. It's gonna be all the same for all the years. The only thing that makes it less boring is kids - that if you actually enjoy caring for them.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 07:12 PM
0

Obviously, I was referring to the fact that if laws based on an image of a democratic society don't lead to such, then it's an obvious choice to try out a totalitarian one. It's sarcasm. So hard to get? > Laws based on an ideal world don't lead to creation of an ideal world. It's actually a great thought. Such a shame though, that you bring it up it to defend the regarded argument that the government should decide the result of the votes, not the people, so that a democratic society is possible.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 03:19 PM
1

> Why should policies be based on a fake reality? Yeah, of course. Nobody wants to live in an egalitarian society where everyone is equal, and it's such a dumb idea to base your policies in such a way that would try to create an ideal, yet fake image of equal, fair, just society. What nonsense. It's clear that we should base politics solely on the hard and cold reality of, for example, 1938's USSR. Democracy is for pussies.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 03:08 PM
7

Yeah, conceptually, true. But, for example, a left-wing woman might feel herself more represented by Bernie Sanders, who is a man, than Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is a woman (no emphasis on persona or who is running for what, just theoretical example). Imagine being a woman, voting for a man to represent you, and then getting a woman representative whose views may not only be directly contrary to yours, they might as well harm your further representation. If anything, in a truly feminist/egalit…
/r/MensRights25/11/23 11:28 AM
0

I was making a point that having both women's day and men's day is all right. They're paid holidays too. Not a point about "military good/bad". > if not this is not the sub for you my friend Imagine trying to turn any subreddit that you visit into a toxic shithole echo chamber though 🤮🤮🤮
/r/MensRights03/06/23 10:01 PM
0

> and women's day is just... what? Well, in Russia there's also a "soldier's day" which basicly means men's day, because all healthy men must serve at least 1 year in the military when they turn 18. A lot of people don't even care if you actually served the term.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 09:47 PM
3

> So by that logic if the teacher is a white nationalist or stormed the capital on Jan 6th they should keep their job no matter what? I don't think it should matter, though. Imagine if someone got fired for being at a BLM protest that turned into looting. Or if someone tried to, say, to partake in a work-related rally. If the employer can fire you for behaviour in personal time, all union activity instantly vaporizes - you will be fired instantly.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/23 10:49 PM
-6

> Actually it can simply show that mothers get fathers to discipline children - i.e. the mothers act out their anger by proxy, something that is backed up by other research showing women perpetrate more violence-by-proxy than men do. Yeah, this sounds plausible. However, the point of the post is a divorced family, where there is only one mother or one father. Could you please explain how is that related to the subject, because I can't see the connection? This post shows that mothers abuse their …
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:08 PM
-4

> excuses How's that excusing? Excusing is for individual people. I think that if the roles were reversed, like literally, abuse would happen the same, alongside with stuff like homicides, suicide rates, other stuff. > a lot of More like one logical statement? Bad education/wealth -> failing marriage with unwanted kids -> divorce -> mother gets unwanted custody -> mother is doing the abuse. On the other hand: Bad education/wealth -> failing marriage with unwanted kids -> divorce -> father is act…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 09:04 PM
-27

> Children in mother-only households are 4 times more likely to be fatally abused than children in father-only households. Children in mother-only households are much more likely to be a product of a failed marriage, whereas children in father-only households are there because the mother died, or the father is a much better parent than the mother (because the court defaults to the mother's custody). Also, failed marriages is very often correlated with bad education/social status, which are thing…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 06:05 PM
3

> So, I'm way smarter than most people. That's just objectively true. But now I have to say something bad about myself to not get seen as arrogant, right? Bruh.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 06:21 PM
0

> women aren't attracted to that [effeminate] kind of man. Either this is a way too broad generalization, or a way too broad use of "effeminate", because surely there are women that are attracted to femine personas.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:37 PM
0

By doing that you are making a direct comparison between the lot of women and the lot of slaves. ​ By using an analogue, I've meant to show what oppression is, because you have troubles understanding that when your freedom is limited by the government or whatever you are oppressed. Thus, my point is not about women being slaves. Obviously, they aren't (well, again, most of them). ​ You then doubled-down by following with "However, sadly, slavery still exists nowadays". I've meant actual slavery,…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 04:46 PM
-1

> If your point is based on women being slaves, questioning whether women are slaves is a valid point. It is not. My point was in the next paragraph, which, I suppose, you haven't read. > just not in the west I did none comments about the situation in the West. I did so with sole reasoning that I`m not from the west and have zero moral right to comment on the men of west. > By doing so, you are claiming that western men are morally superior to every other kind of man, as western men don't oppres…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:29 PM
-1

> Are non-western women slaves to men? Are you proposing that non-western men are morally inferior to western men? Surely, you can ignore my main point to that matter and only react to a flashy sentence. > Are non-western women slaves to men? Most of them - I don`t think so. However, sadly, slavery still exists nowadays. > Are you proposing that non-western men are morally inferior to western men? There are no 'non-western men'`s culture. Non-west implies dozens of countries, e.g. African ones, …
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:56 PM
-1

> Are women in the middle east oppressed by the social and legal obligation put on men to protect and provide for their wellbeing? They certainly don't choose that privilege. Is a slave oppressed because of his master's obligation to provide food and housing for his wellbeing? He certainly didn't choose that privilege. If someone takes something from you without your consent, even if they give you something else in return - you are being oppressed, as you have no control over what is going with …
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:38 PM
-2

> Having privileges not enjoyed by one gender while not having the rights that gender needs to carry out it's obligations isn't oppression It depends whether you can choose if you can have those privileges & obligations yourself, not depending on your sex. If you can't, that can be called oppression, I think. Because, well, your freedoms to do as you want are oppressed. (Oppression is malicious or unjust treatment or exercise of power, often under the guise of governmental authority or cultural …
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:02 AM
0

> I would certainly love to hear the justification for that. No offense, but it is very likely that you were underpaid and the situation would be so no matter the sex. The employer didn`t want to give you a raise because it would lower his profits. However, when he tried to hire a new worker with your old salary, he couldn`t succeed and was ought to hire somebody with that significantly higher demands of payment. It is a common thing when the employer is dumb and/or greedy.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:15 PM
6

> If a man can’t control his anger enough not to punch a wall and destroy someone’s property he’s still a boy. Men have control of their emotions. Nah, it`s fine for men or women to be angry in some situations.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 01:44 PM
2

Domestic violence? Isn`t that homicide?
/r/MensRights06/09/20 09:59 AM
41

Why half though?
/r/MensRights04/09/20 05:14 PM
1

Either you do male/female/disabled (splitted by m/f too or located in m/f) bathrooms or you do unisex bathrooms + disabled. Because there is no reason of making one female and one unisex bathroom, because making unisex (no urinals)+unisex would be completely the same for women, but without discrimination for men. And this is r/MensRights , a sub literally against discrimination for men.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 10:26 AM
1

Put it on previously women`s bathroom, of course, where the urinals do not exist, while men`s bathroom can get usual unisex plate.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 10:09 AM
2

Because stuff was already built and you have to work with what the building has. No one wants to force people to spend 10s of thousands of dollars remodeling bathrooms. Put unisex plate saying no urinals, problem solved. What if there a movie session main auditory of which is women? So, there would be like 50 women and 15 men. Women already have right to go to male bathroom (in the past) in this case, so no problem here. And, also, if there were two unisex bathrooms, it would be fine for both ge…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 10:01 AM
3

Maybe because it makes sense and you agree, but just pretend to be outraged out this totally benign thing. Idea is good, but realisation is bullshit. Either you do male/female/disabled (splitted by m/f too or located in m/f) bathrooms or you do unisex bathrooms + disabled. What if there a movie session main auditory of which is men? So, there would be like 50 men and 15 women. If every man would want to go to male bathrooms they would overflow it too, like women can, but they cant use F bathroom…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 09:41 AM
5

Never heard of using term Marxism and classes that way, but ok, thanks.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 10:18 AM
-6

Marxist How the hell the Marxism is correlated with hating men?
/r/MensRights26/11/19 09:23 AM
8

Speaking about abortions, not only unprotected sex can lead to unwanted child. Even simple failure of protection may result in that consequence. Isn`t that sub created for discussion of increasing of men rights, rather that decreasing women rights? P.S. No support for anyone, who`s killing their (and not their) born child.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:55 PM
0

If you want to pass your DNA forward can`t you just donate semen? We are living in a modern world, aren`t we?
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:02 PM
4

Lion being incapable of being domesticated Lion are pretty chill though. I think that`s clear that is a troll, isn`t it?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter