TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MrSmigick Archive

View 8 posts and 146 comments by MrSmigick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

There's far more to this issue than one can reasonably fit into a single comment, and a TL;DR wouldn't be able describe the nuance this issue deserves. But if you want to learn more, I recommend watching Sex and Circumcision: An American Love Story by Eric Clopper. Alternatively, you can read the stickied post on r/Intactivism Everyone deserves bodily integrity. Genital mutilation is a human rights violation.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 10:20 PM
7

So you're too dumb to read, huh? Sorry your parents didn't love you enough to keep you in school. Go fuck yourself, mutilation apologist.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/22 12:24 PM
6

The foreskin is not extra or optional. It is an important, functioning, integral part of a man's penis. The functions of the foreskin and the adverse effects of circumcision The foreskin has several functions and accounts for most of the sensitivity of the penis. A comparison of the sensitivity of an uncircumcised penis and a circumcised one. The normal glans is an internal structure, only exposed briefly during urination, washing, and sexual arousal. Its surface is moist and is not keratinised.…
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/22 12:17 PM
50

The foreskin is not extra or optional. It is an important, functioning, integral part of a man's penis. The functions of the foreskin and the adverse effects of circumcision The foreskin has several functions and accounts for most of the sensitivity of the penis. A comparison of the sensitivity of an uncircumcised penis and a circumcised one. The normal glans is an internal structure, only exposed briefly during urination, washing, and sexual arousal. Its surface is moist and is not keratinised.…
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 04:25 AM
2

I've heard about all the benefits of circumcision before. I still want my foreskin back. Listing "benefits" to try and convince genital mutilation victims that it's not a big deal after violating their consent and bodies seems to me like soft gaslighting. I mean, imagine talking about "benefits" of FGM to female victims while ignoring consent issues. Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01550.…
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/21 04:50 PM
4

Before some smooth brained cuck comes along to say "oh, but circumcision is no big deal" I'd like to refute that. Circumcision is genital mutilation. The functions of the foreskin and the adverse effects of circumcision The foreskin has several functions and accounts for most of the sensitivity of the penis. A comparison of the sensitivity of an uncircumcised penis and a circumcised one. The normal glans is an internal structure, only exposed briefly during urination, washing, and sexual arousal…
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/21 04:08 PM
1

Pleasure and Orgasm in Women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) https://www.jsm.jsexmed.org/article/S1743-6095(15)31699-4/fulltext Lucrezia Catania, Omar Abdulcadir, Vincenzo Puppo, Jole Baldaro Verde, Jasmine Abdulcadir, Dalmar Abdulcadir "The group of 137 women, affected by different types of FGM/C, reported orgasm in almost 86%, always 69.23%; 58 mutilated young women reported orgasm in 91.43%, always 8.57%; after defibulation 14 out of 15 infibulated women reported orgasm; the gr…
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/21 06:58 AM
1

Female, intersex, and male genital mutilation are comparable Genital mutilation is unnecessary, painful, and causes physical and psychological harm. It can lead to death. Minors, who are incapable of providing informed consent, are usually the ones who are subject to it. People who support it are grossly ignorant of important facts pertaining to the genitalia. They believe that it has no significant adverse effects, and that it improves their sex lives. It is defended with reasons involving trad…
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/21 06:57 AM
3

I'm ex-Jew myself because my faith started to fall apart once I questioned circ. In my opinion, you're right that Jews have a strange relationship with circ. Jews don't even seem to like circ, and yet they still do it. I strongly suspect that the reason for the big Brit Milah parties is a coping mechanism. If you're eating good food and celebrating with family members, it kinda emotionally distances you from the fact that a baby is being tortured and mutilated. How can circumcision be some horri…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 07:37 PM
6

I do not know if I actually received metzitzah b'peh or not because I never asked any family members about it, and I doubt they'd remember when it's been decades. However, I'm not going to throw that away as a possibility. That's why I used the word "possibly." If it did happen, however, I would be several leagues less mad about that than the circumcision itself. If you think I'm being melodramatic, that's on you. There've been dudes who've been so furious about this that they've killed themselv…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 03:47 AM
13

How Do you Feel About Society - As a Man? I feel alienated from society. I'm an American who was born into a Jewish family who has since renounced his faith. I was never into politics. I just wanted to work, come home, and play video games. However, there is nothing that sets my brain on fire more than circumcision. As an infant, I was held down like a damn farm animal by a family member while a mohel cut part of my penis off, threw it in the trash, and quite possibly sucked on my penis (google …
/r/MensRights10/12/20 02:22 AM
70

In the United States, female genital cutting is rightfully criminally prohibited, but male genital cutting is sanctioned by the government. The US government does not care about upholding the law and social contract in order to protect defenseless baby boys from being strapped down like farm animals and having functional, erogenous tissues needlessly ablated off their penises. While this may not be the government "controlling" male bodies in the explicit sense, they are still permissive of males…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:30 AM
12

Look at profile. Look at /r/CircumcisionGrief I'm in the opposite situation as your husband. I hate my parents for circumcising me and refuse to have any sort of relationship with them. If you leave your son intact, he can get circumcised as an adult if he wants to (unlikely). If he wants his foreskin back as an adult, then he'll spend the rest of his life trapped in a scarred body that he abhors. Circumcision is genital mutilation and is absolutely NOTHING to play around with. If your husband d…
/r/MensRights29/10/20 10:15 PM
27

Cool, dude. Let me know how it goes, please.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 05:49 AM
709

The commonly claimed benefits of circumcision are that it reduces the risk of getting UTIs, penile cancer, and prevents STDs. These claims are based on reports made by the American Association of Pediatrics. But there is a lot of criticism regarding their research. The important points are mentioned below: It takes around 100 circumcisions to prevent a single UTI, and UTIs can be treated easily by other less invasive ways, like antibiotics. Not to mention, it is easily prevented with basic hygie…
/r/MensRights08/10/20 02:55 AM
3

I get all my anger over this issue out on discord. 😏
/r/MensRights06/10/20 06:16 AM
29

Circumcision is genital mutilation. The functions of the foreskin and the adverse effects of circumcision The foreskin has several functions and accounts for most of the sensitivity of the penis. A comparison of the sensitivity of an uncircumcised penis and a circumcised one. The normal glans is an internal structure, only exposed briefly during urination, washing, and sexual arousal. Its surface is moist and is not keratinised. However, circumcision converts the glans into an external organ. Im…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 11:32 PM
2

The functions of the foreskin and the adverse effects of circumcision The foreskin has several functions and accounts for most of the sensitivity of the penis. A comparison of the sensitivity of an uncircumcised penis and a circumcised one. The normal glans is an internal structure, only exposed briefly during urination, washing, and sexual arousal. Its surface is moist and is not keratinised. However, circumcision converts the glans into an external organ. Immediately after the operation, it re…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 05:15 PM
2

The commonly claimed benefits of circumcision are that it reduces the risk of getting UTIs, penile cancer, and prevents STDs. These claims are based on reports made by the American Association of Pediatrics. But there is a lot of criticism regarding their research. The important points are mentioned below: It takes around 100 circumcisions to prevent a single UTI, and UTIs can be treated easily by other less invasive ways, like antibiotics. Not to mention, it is easily prevented with basic hygie…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 05:13 PM
23

These people are literally pedophiles with a fetish for infant cock and ball torture. It's so fucking absurd sounding, but that's not an exaggeration in the slightest. These freaks promote genital mutilation on social media to fuel their perverted, pedophilic genital mutilation fetish. When I was first getting into intactivism, I thought at first "No, this can't possibly be real, right?" But no. It's 100% real. The more I learn about circumcision, the more I realize that the truth is impossibly …
/r/MensRights20/09/20 04:50 AM
1

Death penalty (in Minecraft) for child mutilators when?
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/20 02:54 AM
3

Death penalty (in Minecraft) for child mutilators when?
/r/MensRights31/07/20 03:17 PM
23

Sometimes I like to think that the world really did end in 2012 and now we're all just living in hell.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/20 10:30 PM
21

Ah, yes, the "land of the free" where a very pleasurable part of your dick gets cut off when you're a baby, leaving you permanently cucked for life. 🤡
/r/MensRights08/01/20 11:38 PM
19

be me get home from my vasectomy hear moaning and slapping coming from my wife's room must be Chad again know they would want privacy, sit down at my computer log onto reddit and open /r/MensRights read a post from le intactivists laugh at all those funny intactivists who actually wash their cocks i don't have to wash my cock because mom cut part of it off for me when i was a baby try to think of a funny way to own all the intactivists le epic Ben Shapiro style suck the cheeto dust off my finger…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 08:51 AM
27

Your mom cut off part of your penis when you were a baby, and the only way you know how to cope is calling people pus cock lmaooooo
/r/MensRights01/01/20 08:31 AM
32

She's doing God's work. :)
/r/MensRights01/01/20 03:50 AM
6

They KNOW their time to cut children's private parts is running short, which is why proponents of male infant circ are pushing for legal FGM. It's a buffer. Circumcision is so blatantly unethical, and so obviously an act of extreme sexual violence if you ever watch a video of one, that I feel it would be remiss to not have some sort of retroactive punishment and justice for the victims in the form of stem cell based tissue regeneration like r/Foregen is trying to do. ALL forms of female genital …
/r/MensRights01/01/20 12:33 AM
7

Galatians 5:2 has some pretty spicy things to say about circumcision. I have an intactivist friend who is a Christian that could explain it way better than a nonbeliever like myself could, but Christianity BANNED circumcision because the sacrifice of Jesus was suppose to be the last blood sacrifice to end the prescriptions of the Old Testament and in their place the sacraments of the New Testament were instituted. Whoever, after the Crucifixion, places his hope in the Mosaic Law's requirements u…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 12:15 AM
6

I totally agree. I also know people within intactivism who are ethnically Jewish but are only loosely religious who HATE being circumcised. It blows people's minds and they completely lose their marbles when I point out that it is anti-semitic to subject a boy to excruciatingly painful penis torture/genital mutilation just because he was born ethnically Jewish.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 12:00 AM
8

I've seen many proponents of male genital cutting like her resort to supporting a person's religious "right" for FGM when pressured on the ethics of male infant circumcision. Brian Earp has a pretty good explanation of the whole phenomenon. People will support all manner of disgusting behavior if it is to defend male infant genital cutting.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 10:18 PM
18

I always get a bit of a laugh when circumcisers screech about "muh cleanliness" and then in the same breath downplay the horrors of non consensual genital cutting by saying "iT's JuSt A fLaP oF sKiN bRo. WhY aRe YoU sO mAd?" Foreskin can't simultaneously be a superfluous piece of skin and also be an impossible to clean enigma. Though being cut myself, I don't have any first hand experience. Circumcision is genital mutilation, and it should be illegal to cut a minor's genitals in absence of a med…
/r/MensRights31/12/19 10:12 PM
10

Note that this doctor was suspended and arrested along with the boy's grandparents not because the boy was circumcised despite not being able to give informed consent, but because the mother didn't provide consent to the procedure. The individual who is being cut is given no consideration. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:53 PM
7

I'm surprised more feminists aren't all over the issue of infant circumcision. No one has a problem recognizing that touching a person's genitals without their consent (unless in cases of hygienic cleaning purposes or medical need where doing so will preserve a person's future bodily integrity when someone is not capable of providing consent for some reason) is an act of sexual violence. Yet for some reason, people have cultural blinders on that stops them from recognizing that touching a child'…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:11 AM
11

I'm also a teen and am having a really hard time understanding why you'd think it's easier to masturbate without a foreskin. I don't have one, so I can't give first hand experience, but foreskin is basically a continuation of shaft skin with a mucosal lining on the inner tissue. Basically, inner foreskin has a texture sort of like your mouth or the inside of a woman's vagina. Because it's a continuous, loose sleeve, foreskin rolls over the head of the penis during masturbation. If you ever see l…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 04:29 AM
6

I'd highly recommend you watch Sex And Circumcision: An American Love Story by Eric Clopper. Also try this video by bioethicist Brian Earp. There's honestly a lot more to this subject than a person can reasonably be expected to type out in a single comment, hence why those videos are on the longer side. If you truly are interested and watch each of these videos all the way through, I think you'll find them quite enlightening.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:59 AM
4

What's the story about you getting circumcised as a kid and not as an infant, if you don't mind me asking?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:15 AM
12

I HIGHLY recommend watching the play Sex and Circumcision by ex-Harvard professor Eric Clopper. He got fired for spreading the truth about circumcision at Harvard. It's funny, informative, and is a good place to start when taking the foreskin red pill. The rabbit hole goes pretty deep, and this will get you fairly deep. This will explain the anti-circ stance quite clearly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:09 AM
23

I'm pretty active on the anti-circ scene outside of reddit, and this objectification of men starting with circumcision is unbelievably fucked up. Check out this cringe. I've seen tons of these pro-circ mothers talk about how "no woman wants to suck on an anteater anyway" and other dumb shit. If you think that's bad, though, go check out some of the people who call themselves circumsexuals. Yes. This is a real thing. When I was first dipping my toes into intactivism, I thought circumsexuals were …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:50 AM
1

"I'm glad that someone cut off part of my penis and threw it in the trash." Horrible cope, bro. Enjoy your dysfunctional cock, tho. http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:42 AM
2

If you aren't aware of them, check our r/Foregen. They're a non-profit trying to use regenerative medicine to regenerate foreskin for circumcised men. They're currently preparing for animal trials. They're underfunded and could use the help. I give them 25$ a month. Currently, surgical foreskin restoration has godawful results. Manual, tension restoration to create a "fauxskin" is far closer to the real thing than a surgical solution. This is done by using different devices to put tension on you…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:28 AM
1

Yeah, what HandOverYourCummies said. There are pedophiles who are aroused by seeing circumcisions and advocate for circumcision to feed their grotesque fetish. https://imgur.com/a/jjMETsx
/r/MensRights15/07/19 06:54 AM
37

Literally genital mutilation and object rape of a baby. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 01:37 AM
1

Will it outlaw MGM (routine infant circumcision) the same way all forms of FGM are outlawed?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 07:27 PM
2

I have some idea of what foreskin feels like because I still have a tiny bit of my frenulum. If you don't know what that is, the frenulum is a long strip of skin that anchors the foreskin to the glans of the penis. I've often heard people call it the male g-spot. It is either totally or partially removed during circumcision. The physical feeling on my frenulum is a LOT different than the rest of my penis. It's more "ticklish" for lack of a better word. Take your pointer finger and gently brush t…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:21 PM
2

I think the best place you can start is by learning about MGM/routine infant circumcision. Contrary to popular belief, foreskin is not "extra skin" or optional. Rather, it is an integral, important part of a man's penis. If trans issues are something you're interested in, circumcision directly impacts the trans community. IIRC, surgeons have a more difficult time constructing neo-vaginas from circumcised penises because of the lack of highly specialized mucosal tissue to work with. Circumcision …
/r/MensRights05/06/19 06:37 PM
12

I would argue that it's more comparable to dehooding (removal of clitoral hood) than clitorectomy, but I've heard other intactivists say otherwise. The clitoral hood and foreskin are each the genital prepuce, but the foreskin and all of its supporting structures are more pleasurable and more functional than the female clitoral hood. It does diminish enjoyment of sex. This is both backed up by science and by some men who were circumcised as adults. http://www.circumstitions.com/regret.html#men ht…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:11 AM
14

You're more likely to get certain STDs during unprotected sex if you're circumcised. Source It takes 100 circumcisions to prevent 1 UTI. Source Circumcision reduces your odds of getting penile cancer by 70%. Seeing as how penile cancer is one of the rarest malignancies in the world, however, it's hardly worth taking drastic action against. Source You wouldn't cut off your infant daughter's breast buds to prevent breast cancer, why would anyone cut off their son's foreskin to prevent penile cance…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:13 AM
22

First off is the loss of or diminishing of the "gliding mechanism" which is how the foreskin glides back and forth during intercourse and masturbation. The foreskin will stimulate the glans by gliding over it, and the loose skin means that the woman's natural lubrication is not drawn out and evaporated, making sex easier without the need for artificial lubrication. The covering over the glans also protects the glans from abrasions and friction from harsh fabrics. If you are circumcised, you don'…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:02 AM
8

It's true. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis. The circumcision scar is the most sensitive part of the circumcised penis. All the parts taken during circumcision are more sensitive than the most sensitive part of the circumcised penis. The glans of the circumcised penis are also less sensitive. For men like you and I, there is an exquisite form of sexual pleasure that we cannot experience because part of our penises were cut off. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/173788…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 03:07 AM
2

Videos of the "procedure" are a great tool for changing someone's mind on circumcision. Some of those videos are fucking brutal. I'd sooner watch an internet shocker video like 2Girls1Cup or 3Guys1Hammer than another circumcision video.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:35 AM
3

There was a case where a mother was jailed for trying to protect her four year old son from genital mutilation, and she was eventually forced to sign the consent forms to circumcise her son. These fucking pedophiles will stop at nothing to object rape and genitally mutilate kids and they need to be brought to justice. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/fl-circumcision-mother-court-hearing-20150522-story.html Circumcision already is ILLEGAL! We have a double standard in our law, and it…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:29 PM
10

Think again. For the circumcised man, on every out-stroke during sex, the penis head is shoveling vaginal lubricant out of her vagina. "Also, since more of the loose skin of the penis remains inside the vagina, the woman's natural lubrication is not drawn out to evaporate to a great extent, which makes sex easier without using artificial lubricants." http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/ "O'Hara and O'Hara reported that women who had experienced coitus with bo…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 08:54 AM
13

It makes a difference because cleaning a circumcised penis is harder when you have to put globs of petroleum jelly over the wound and also his bleeding, exposed glans. That, or you have to be very, very careful to not dislodge the plastic ring covering the circumcision wound if the doctor did the circumcision using a plastibell. I'm not a parent, but even I can tell you that it's easier to clean an intact penis. Parents of circumcised sons are constantly confronted with horrifying shit like this…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 08:36 AM
42

It's easier to care for an intact penis than one with a feces and urine filled open wound. Ignorance is no excuse for cutting off part of a baby's penis. https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-parents/care-of-the-intact-penis/
/r/MensRights27/04/19 07:42 AM
18

My first piece of advice is to sit her down and talk with her. When you do this, remind yourself that YOU are the one in control of the conversation. Dominate everything about the conversation. Be confrontational. Do not relent. Make her life impossible to live without you bothering her constantly about circumcision. Show her this NSFW video of an infant circumcision. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f2HtnfhFyM&t=4s Next, show her this list of men who RESENT that they were mutilated at birth. Ha…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 07:35 AM
9

Foreskin won't give you AIDs, but reading what she wrote definitely gave me something. Cannot wait until every object child rapist who does this "procedure" without consent or medical need is brought to justice.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 04:03 AM
6

Question. Do you believe parents should be allowed to circumcise their daughters?
/r/MensRights11/04/19 01:55 AM
21

Absolutely disgusting. These object child rapists deserve to be punished to the full extent of the law.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 10:39 PM
6

Fuckin' gross.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 07:30 PM
4

"my husband helped hold him down." That's fucking disgusting. Cannot wait until this barbaric shit is illegal, and every object child rapist who does this "procedure" without medical justification is sued into oblivion, forced to register as a sex offender, and thrown in prison where they belong.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:12 AM
3

Show her an unedited video of a circumcision without anesthetic being done on a baby and porn of intact men getting blowjobs. She won't be laughing then.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 03:39 AM
10

Bullshit. While feminists may oppose circumcision, it's never something they discuss nor care about unless promted to by MRAs. It's just a talking point they use to win brownie points with men. They only oppose it superficially. I've never seen a feminist donate to Foregen, tweet with the hashtag #i2, or start a thread about intactivism. Any time anyone tries to bring up male circumcision in a feminist context, the response is "muh FGM!" There's all sorts of forms of FGM. Some are more extreme t…
/r/MensRights06/03/19 09:51 AM
30

Sexism.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 04:55 AM
26

Not an argument. Just thought I'd let you know.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 04:52 AM
14

Holy fuck, this is cringe.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:47 AM
8

Am American and have never heard of circumcising to match cousins. Absolutely degenerate. And, no, there's no penis matching family events aside from the mutilation itself. Americans are just fucking stupid. Cannot wait until this disgusting shit is illegal and every single child rapist who does this "procedure" is thrown in prison and sued into oblivion.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 08:52 AM
6

Mine was "sO hE'lL lOoK lIkE hIs DaD aNd It LoOkS bEtTeR." Fucking disgusting. I can't imagine anything more perverted than cutting off part of someone's genitals to make them match their father. Cannot wait for Foregen to succeed and for every single degenerate who does this "procedure" to be thrown in prison for initiating sexual violence against children. We're gonna win one day.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 08:45 AM
2

I've answered this question in a previous post, and I've sourced all my claims. The answer to that question is here.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 10:24 PM
11

Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:46 AM
1

I know exactly how it feels, bro. I remember when i started learning about circumcision was when so many things began making sense. I thought chafing was just a normal thing to deal with. Feels horrible physically. But now the chafing feels horrible mentally, too. Foregen can't get here fast enough.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 04:11 AM
4

Can't wait for the site to launch. Fuck circumcision.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:54 PM
1

This comment deserves more upvotes.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 12:36 PM
4

I knew it. I've been saying for ages now that soon we're going to see a generation of very angry young men who feel enraged and violated by their circumcisions. I am one of them. Unfortunately, there may be nothing this mother can do. I know I have no desire to ever have a relationship with my parents because I can't look at them or speak to them without feeling gross and violated. I know my parents were duped. I don't care. That doesn't take away the violation of my consent at the most vulnerab…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 10:57 AM
1

Bro, if you haven't already heard, check out r/Foregen. Foregen is a nonprofit researching regenerative medicine for the purpose of foreskin regeneration. They haven't carried out human clinical trials yet, but they recently released a paper detailing the development of a decellularized foreskin scaffold for the purpose of foreskin regeneration. Check them out.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 11:01 PM
7

I know, bro. I know. The catharsis would be nice. I know where the doctor who cut me practices, too. His practice is only about a 30 minute drive from where I live. Fortunately, I'll be far the fuck away soon. How far exactly, I can't say. But far.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:45 AM
12

Awesome. I can't wait until this barbaric shit is illegal. Fewer boys are being mutilated at birth every year, and soon circ'd will be what's considered weird. I suspect intactivism will one day see a great surge in numbers and popularity when circ'd men and boys are in the minority, and we'll see lots of very, very angry young men.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 04:54 AM
12

Absolutely. I cannot wait until this barbaric shit is illegal and every single child rapist who does this "procedure" is thrown in prison alongside the parents for by-proxy initiating sexual violence against their children.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 01:19 AM
26

Because most Americans have been brainwashed into the misandrist belief by their culture that foreskin is "dirty," not dissimilar how women who've had their clitoral hoods removed will tell you that intact female genitalia is "dirty." Circumcision started in America because Dr.Kellogg (yes, the Cornflakes guy) believed circumcising boys as punishment for masturbation would "cure" masturbation. He also believed in using acid to burn the clitoris off girls as punishment for masturbation. Circumcis…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 01:12 AM
6

Yep. Non-consensual circumcision is absolutely disgusting. I cannot wait for this barbaric shit to be outlawed and for every single child rapist who performs this "procedure" to be thrown in prison.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 09:59 AM
22

It's ruined my relationship with my parents. Can't look at them without feeling violated. Also, I'm just gonna pimp for Foregen real quick. They recently released a cool paper about the decellularization of foreskin scaffolds for the purpose of foreskin regeneration. I give 'em 15 bucks a month. Definitely worth checking out if you hate being circumcised.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 08:00 AM
3

It's always nice to see someone opposing circumcision. It is disturbing that it's still socially acceptable for parents to by proxy commit sexual violence against their children in this way. I wouldn't label myself feminist, but I'd gladly call anyone who wants to help end genital mutilation my friend. Also, if you want to know what men generally think about this, I'd say most men are sorta in denial about circumcision being genital mutilation. Or they've been brainwashed by their culture to bel…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:29 AM
3

It might not be the source dunesfrank had in mind, but I found this. https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/boyhood-studies/4/1/bhs040106.xml?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:42 AM
10

Lots of Americans don't even know how a foreskin is suppose to look or what it's functions are. "MuH fLaP oF sKiN" is the only thing they know about foreskin because it's all they've ever heard. I think a lot of guys who've been circumcised since birth hear the thing about 20k nerve endings and get really uncomfortable, so they tend to avoid learning about circumcision and foreskin to protect themselves from the truth. It's easier for them to melt back into arrogant indifference and laugh at unc…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:05 AM
4

Definitely abolish both. There are types of MGM other than circumcision, too, like glandectomy and castration that are more comparable to more advanced forms of FGM, but I figured male circumcision is probably more comparable to type 1A. If ending male circumcision and preventing future boys from being circumcised without their consent is something you're interested in, check out r/Foregen. Foregen is a non-profit aiming to use regenerative medicine to regenerate foreskin and it's supporting str…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:51 AM
5

There are a range of practices in regards to FGM, and I believe the type OP refers to is type 1A, removal of the clitoral hood, which male circumcision is absolutely comparable to. They are each the genital prepuce. I suspect you're probably thinking of excision of the clitoris, clitoral hood, and sewing of the vaginal canal. But correct me if you're referring to something different. Okay so how would we feel if circumcision made sex painful for us, Well, technically, it does for some. If enough…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:52 AM
1

Link plz. I want the sweet cringe.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:59 AM
7

So I get to live feeling upset that my consent was violated and that the functions of the prepuce were robbed from me, but at least some bourgeois sloots can get dick facials to hide their insecurity over aging, and that's what's really important here. /s
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:11 AM
1

Hey, brother. In case you aren't already aware, r/Foregen
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:51 PM
3

Wow, I just don't even know what to say to this. No empathy. Pure psychopathy. I'm so fucking tired of my pain being dismissed just because so few understand it. I'm so tired of my body being viewed as someone else's plaything. She is so smugly self-assured of her worldview that she would never engage with ideas opposing hers. She is scum. I checked her twitter. It's filled with lots of feminist bullshit and SJW type of stuff.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:14 PM
6

It is. They have it at the top of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 08:27 AM
3

Yes, I think it is fair to say that I'm both passionate about this and that I have bones to pick about having been circumcised. To be perfectly honest, I have a hard time understanding why someone wouldn't be annoyed by being circ'd as an infant. Even if one would prefer to not have foreskin, it seems weird to me that they wouldn't be annoyed about having been denied the opportunity to choose for themselves. I just think it's a choice that should be made at the age of consent by the one who will…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 12:33 AM
4

No, this seems more like you trying to push a personal believe and using science as a basis for something to lean on. Precisely. I form my views based on the scientific reality and then argue for why I believe my views are correct. I never really thought much about circumcision before I decided to read about it. Sex is great, no loss of feeling that's for sure Did you even read the comment I linked to? "The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis was the circumcision scar on the ventral…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:49 PM
2

I hate how I will never know what having a whole intact penis is like. In case you didn't know, there is still hope, brother. r/Foregen
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:09 PM
3

I literally just linked to a comment with a list of the affects circumcision has with sources for all the claims. here's a fucking redditor trying to tell me that I now apparently do have problems. I'm not the one telling you that you have problems. It's the science that is. You can tell yourself all you want that it doesn't affect you, but that won't make it true. Science doesn't give two fucks about your feelings.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:09 PM
7

Yep. They cut their own children to sublimate their own subconscious grief, and leaving the child intact would surely make the father realize he was genitally mutilated and that his consent was violated. But by mutilating his child, he can reinforce his bulwark of denial. Thanks, dad. :/
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:57 PM
3

It's never effected my health Here's a giant list of ways circumcision has affected your health.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:48 PM
1

If you want some sources, I suggest you take a look at the comment I made in a previous post here.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:42 PM
4

I just said that it's not like the difference is so huge you lose much. I already sourced that you lose 10k-20k nerve endings and that the parts lost as a result of circumcision are all more sensitive than the most sensitive part of the circumcised penis and that the glans of the circumcised penis are less sensitive. In comparison, the female clitoris has about 8k nerve endings. So yes, it is totally fair to say that you lose a great deal of sensitivity and pleasure. But since you seem to like a…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 04:07 AM
5

Anecdotal evidence < Scientific papers In your original comment you asked, for people who think circumcisions are awful, why? And I gave credible sources for all my claims of the problems circumcision causes. The loss of the gliding mechanics from the foreskin, decrease in sensitivity, decrease in size, increased pain and abrasions during sex for female partners, decreased lubrication, and increased likelihood of sexual dysfunction are my answers. I'd imagine you don't go around talking with you…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:46 AM
6

That being said the only man in my entire family to not be Circumcised is literally on oxygen as we speak, while everybody else is perfectly fine. Irrelevant. That has nothing to do with the state of his foreskin. You even admitted this earlier in the thread. and the one person who didn't is my grandpa currently on oxygen. (For reasons unrelated but still the point is there.) Sound familiar? You don't lose all ability to feel pleasure. Your reading comprehension ability is that of a 5th grader. …
/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:25 AM
6

Have you ever felt your glans chafe against a harsh pair of underwear just like every other circumcised man has? Yes? Then you've noticed it. Ever had sex with a woman without a condom and needed an artificial lubricant either for hers or your own comfort? Yes? Then you've noticed it. Can't stimulate your glans during masturbation without a lubricant? Yes? Then you've noticed it. Do your glans look dried out and cracked like the ones on the right as opposed to the ones on the left? NSFW Yes? The…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:11 AM
6

Bruh, I already provided sources showing that the so called health benefits are completely negligible and sourced tons of the harms. I don't think preventing 1 out of every 100 UTIs and reducing your likelihood for developing one of the rarest malignancies in the world is worth trading the most erogenous zone of your body for. Also, I already sourced that circumcised men are more likely to contract certain types of STDs compared to their intact counter parts.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:49 AM
1

I don't know. I'm on PC, but I've never tried copying links that way. Also, don't have a smart phone.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:34 AM
1

Nah, you'd have to source each of them individually. Bit of a pain, I know. :/
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:32 AM
1

Maybe I will, brother. Maybe I will. 😎👌
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:22 AM
11

So you're circumcised and fine with it? Good for you. But some of us feel violated in the knowledge that our sexual experience has been altered without our consent. It's difficult putting into the words the pain and anger of being circumcised and genuinely wishing you weren't and despising that this was done without your consent. For some of us, being branded with a religious symbol we don't identify with can be frustrating. To be absolutely clear, I don't want adult circumcision outlawed. I jus…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:04 AM
5

Wait, it is? Where is it being outlawed? Genuinely curious, because I haven't heard about this.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:16 AM
20

People get upset because something is "oFfEnSiVe" but isn't that the point of the documentary? To offend the perpetuation of this vile tradition? To offend the pro-cut crowd? I don't trust people who complain about something being offensive. We can never form a fully accurate, honest opinion if we hide ourselves from the full truth in all its visceral, graphic form. The same can be applied elsewhere. Netflix's main goal is to make money, and what makes them money? Bold, strong arguments that cha…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:13 AM
1

If they say there is no proof circumcision ablates sensitivity, show them this study. I'm cut, and I have difficulty putting into words the pain of being cut, not wanting to be, and being aware of the damage and the functions stolen from me. Funnily enough, denial is perhaps the most natural response when confronted with a truth so horrifying, because denial protects one from that pain. Additionally, a man circumcises his son to sublimate the grief of what has been stolen from him. If he were to…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:38 AM
1

Trying showing them this NSFW picture. I'm a straight, circumcised bro and even I can admit uncirc'd looks better. But more importantly, we have to put more effort into people who are willing to listen. The stronger one's denial is, the more people telling the truth it takes to destroy their lies. People willing to listen are more susceptible to accepting the truth. When it comes to people with weaker bulwarks of denial, we can get them to listen simply by repeating the truth again and again. Ev…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 11:57 PM
3

Good. Hopefully awareness about this procedure will rise, meaning fewer infant boys will be mutilated, greater pressure to outlaw the procedure, and an increase in Foregen supporters. I can't wait for the day I am whole again. However, that's being optimistic. Accepting the truth that male circumcision is mutilation is one for Americans that comes with horrifying implications about yourself (especially if you're a circumcised male), society, medicine, and even your own parents. Many people are s…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 11:19 PM
2

Yes, I have some theories about (((who))) is responsible. Also, I'd just like to add that it's really refreshing whenever I see a woman who is into intactivism. Hell, it's refreshing seeing anyone talk about this stuff, but you get the idea. Hopefully Foregen will succeed and (((they))) won't do anything to sabotage it.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 08:14 AM
3

Am American and can confirm. My anatomy textbooks in elementary and high school only ever showed circumcised penises. I remember growing up thinking the anatomy and mechanics of my dick felt inconvenient and uncomfortable and thought that's just how it was. I had heard the word circumcision before, but because both my parents are atheists, and because I knew it was something Jews did, I figured I was safe. I wouldn't learn about circumcision or that I was circumcised until after high school. How…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 11:58 PM
5

That feminist journalist who mutilated her son for political reasons and said it was like a potato being peeled Of course this exists. It's so unsurprising that this exists. What an absolute psychopath. Do you have a link I can read? Waris Dirie, anti-FGM activist who bragged about mutilating her son and how "pretty" his penis was Oh, cool, another pedo parent sexualizing their infant son. Nothing unusual here. That woman who wrote a paper about how circumcision is a form of genital mutilation a…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 12:04 AM
11

The son will grow up and may one day feel violated that his estranged parents forced this mutilation upon him, enraged he will probably never receive justice, saddened by the side effects of this procedure, and betrayed, but at least his parents think he has a pretty weewee, and that's what's really important here. /s
/r/MensRights09/12/18 12:20 PM
17

Oh, that's because it's a parent sexualizing their own infant child. Nothing weird to see here. /s
/r/MensRights09/12/18 12:11 PM
2

Two wrongs don't make a right. The only thing in the world that matters is results, so I'd rather just have the same protections girls have extended to boys. For men who were already circumcised as infants and who don't like it, I'd like them to be able to sue their parents and the doctor who did this for the cost of Foregen once it comes out.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:35 PM
6

Whatever helps you sleep at night, bud.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:08 PM
3

"bUt MuH hUuLy BuUk! mUh ReLiGoOsE fReDuHm!" I guess this idiot never stopped to consider the freedom of the one being circumcised who will one day become an adult and may feel violated in the knowledge that this has been done to him. Apparently, fairy tails with no basis in reality are a worthy guidepost for making medical decisions according to her. So would she have no problem with parents amputating hands of their child to please Allah if he is caught stealing? After all, Islam teaches to ch…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:45 AM
3

According to the New Zealand Medical Journal, Volume 116, Number 1181 pages 595-596 "O'Hara reported that women who had experienced coitus with both intact and circumcised men preferred intact partners by a ratio of 8.6 to one." "Participants completed a 35-item sexual awareness survey. Women reported they were significantly more likely to have experienced vaginal dryness during intercourse with circumcised than with genitally intact men." Looks like plenty of women like uncut cocks, buddy.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:58 AM
1

Hit me up with the link.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:23 AM
2

Bruh, that hashtag name is genius. I don't use twitter much or really have any followers, but I'm gonna send out a tweet or two right now.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:32 AM
9

Ending male infant genital mutilation and promoting Foregen ought to be the top concerns of the men's rights movement. Sadly, people are simply uneducated about the effects of circumcision and what is lost. They don't understand how huge in scope the negative effects of this mutilation are. As a man who is cut and who has done extensive reading on this subject, I understand, though, why it is talked about so infrequently. Accepting the premise of having been mutilated comes with some uncomfortab…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:11 AM
2

Of course. I'm not sure which things in particular you're looking for sources on, though, so let me know if I miss anything. A lot of the pages I link to will be NSFW Here's a page from the Circumcision Information and Resources Pages that describes in detail the anatomy of the penis and the differences between a circumcised and uncircumcised penis' anatomy. You'll find diagrams that demonstrate and explain the "gliding mechanism" quite well. CIRP is filled with resources and pages, and if this …
/r/MensRights05/12/18 07:42 AM
8

Sorry if this is all irrelevant, but I'm a little confused by the wording of your post and what it is you're trying to do. Would it be possible for you to do your project on the effects of non-consensual male circumcision/intactivism? I see little talk on that issue which I care about greatly. The negative side effects of this procedure are rarely talked about, and I think it is wrong to perform this procedure on non-consenting infants and constitutes sexual assault and genital mutilation. Some …
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:50 PM
2

Modern birth control for women is possibly the most important invention of the last century Really? I mean, I'm glad it exists too, but THE MOST IMPORTANT invention of the last century? Nothing else comes to mind? The internet? MRI scanners? Video recording? No? What about penicillin or chemotherapy? None of those come to mind? I don't know why, but this line irks me so much. Though our society tends to villainize female pleasure When has this ever happened outside the middle east? Also, I don't…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 11:44 AM
3

Feminists are misogynists and they don't even realize it. A woman can be the sluttiest slut in the entire world, she can love having orgasms all day and all night long, and she will never find herself with an unwanted pregnancy unless a man shows up and ejaculates irresponsibly. I didn't realize enjoying having regular orgasms=slutty. Weird. Feminists have adopted the very ideology they once fought against.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 11:27 AM
1

A great place to start would be Samantha bees hit comedy show full frontal This fucking CAN'T be real.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 11:03 AM
314

A WORRYING new trend these worrying videos You know, just gotta let the audience know how they're suppose to think.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 07:00 AM
8

So I get to live feeling upset that I was cut without my consent, but at least some bourgeois sloots get to have young looking skin so they can hide their insecurity about aging, and that's what's really important here. /s
/r/MensRights25/11/18 10:46 PM
41

I'd like to comment something, but I really don't know what to say aside from that BOTH are evil. You're fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 11:55 AM
9

There are many functions of the foreskin you may not know about, including protecting the glans, reducing friction, and thus the need for artificial lubrication during sex, and providing pleasure. Source From a moral standpoint, I'm against circumcising infants at birth because it denies them the ability to make that decision themself upon reaching adulthood, along with robbing them the opportunity to experience what having a foreskin is like. Cutting it off is like cutting off a woman's clitora…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 09:25 AM
3

Imagine if a dad gave his infant daughter breast implants because he likes big tits. Jesus Christ, my fucking sides. It's weird how insanely ridiculous that sounds to anyone in America, but a mother wanting her son's dick cut isn't. Neither are acceptable, but still there's an alternate universe out there somewhere... Anyway if "Personal Reasons" really just is "I prefer the look and feel of a circ'd dick" then that's gross. That's a mother sexualizing her infant son. I also doubt it was the dee…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:30 PM
3

"bUt iT's mUh cHilD sO It'S mUh cHoIcE" Some people need to remember that parents aren't infallible beings when making choices for their children. It's a parent's responsibility to protect their child by making choices on their behalf. In other words, house them, educate them, and make them eat their vegetables, etc. That's it, not deciding how their future adult son should live his life, not deciding their future adult son will feel about his genitalia. There are some things parents don't and s…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:14 PM
2

Do you know if he circumcised his son before or after his own circumcision? No excuse either way, but if he was already circumcised when he inflicted this on his son, I can't help but wonder if he passed this barbaric tradition on as a way to sublimate his own grief about his own stupid choice, to help convince himself that nothing is wrong with him in his mutilated state. If that's the case as I suspect it to be, then what a weak, jealous, pathetic, perverted, and sad individual this man is.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:56 AM
5

If the hypothetical immunized baby grows up and decides he doesn't like immunization, he can choose not to get vaccinated in adulthood. In other words, immunization is a process that continues year after year that any adult can choose to halt if they wish. There is nothing, however, he can do to undo unnecessary genital mutilation. Unlike immunization, once it's done it's done. Immunization =/= infant sexual mutilation.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:46 AM
2

I'm new to intactivism, so I'm still trying to wrestle with the implications and emotions of the belief that circumcision is mutilation. I'd love to make a blog, but between work, studying, and extracurriculars, it's hard to find the time. I've been meaning to sit down and write a post to this sub for a while now about intactivism as it relates to the media, the psychological implications of joining the movement, and the future of the movement, but I just haven't been able to find the time. I gu…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:21 AM
3

You're the moron in this situation you have to correct it, not me. If you don't explain why you think I'm a moron, how can I correct it? I can't read minds. I first suggest you are advocating a situation that does not exist. What does this sentence mean? I'm not trying to be a dick, but I genuinely don't understand what you're trying to say with this sentence. They fo not get to argue the merit of immunizations, language, or religion since those things fall to the default of their parents. Of co…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 04:11 AM
6

That's not an argument. If I'm so wrong, then prove it.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:14 AM
3

"But you guys are genuine idiots and disgusting perverts." Don't care, virgin. "You are completely out of place trying to attack peoples religious practices." The right to practice religion ought to end where someone else's human rights begin, and freedom from genital cutting should be a human right extended to boys and not just girls. America rightfully doesn't tolerate non-consensual female genital cutting as a religious practice, and it shouldn't tolerate male genital cutting fore religion, e…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:46 AM
4

By attacking intact males and intactivists, they can reinforce their bulwark denial protecting them from the harsh truth. I know this because I used to be one of these people. Being confronted by intactivists or an intact male is a signal that they have been mutilated, and accepting the premise of having been mutilated comes with some horrifying implications about yourself, about your parents, society, medicine, and the culture's view of men. Typically, wrestling with these implications will sti…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:20 PM
6

Don't do it. She's body-shaming you for having a penis the way nature intended it to be, and that's really uncool of her. I'm circumcised and and wish I wasn't, but there is NO way to undo the damage done, and although "tugging" restoration gets you back a "fauxskin" it won't restore all the functions a natural foreskin provides. It isn't worth it. Tell her to either learn to live with it, or she can take a hike.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:32 AM
7

Not an argument.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:12 AM
2

Totally on the same page. Even if Foregen succeeds (I'm optimistic) I doubt it'll undo the feelings of betrayal and violation or mend my relationship with my parents. I should clarify that I don't forgive my parents, I just tolerate them. Results are the only thing in the world that matters. But I like to be an optimist-realist. I really believe that one day, you and me will be whole again, brother. One day.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 04:00 AM
1

I'm an intactivist (although I hesitate to use that word because I have autism which makes it hard to do any boots on the ground activism outside of the internet), and my mother is (sorta) a regret parent. She doesn't like talking about it. She gets all uncomfortable and wants to change the subject. I remember lightly telling her about Foregen and how I wish I had my foreskin, and she started apologizing over and over again. Do I forgive her? I don't know. Although I told her I wish this was nev…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 09:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter